Negative regulation of plastidial isoprenoid pathway by herbivore-induced ß-cyclocitral in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Insect damage to plants is known to up-regulate defense and down-regulate growth processes. While there are frequent reports about up-regulation of defense signaling and production of defense metabolites in response to herbivory, much less is understood about the mechanisms by which growth and carbon assimilation are down-regulated. Here we demonstrate that insect herbivory down-regulates the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) pathway in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), a pathway making primarily metabolites for use in photosynthesis. Simulated feeding by the generalist herbivore Spodoptera littoralis suppressed flux through the MEP pathway and decreased steady-state levels of the intermediate 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP). Simulated herbivory also increased reactive oxygen species content which caused the conversion of ß-carotene to ß-cyclocitral (ßCC). This volatile oxidation product affected the MEP pathway by directly inhibiting DXP synthase (DXS), the rate-controlling enzyme of the MEP pathway in Arabidopsis and inducing plant resistance against S. littoralis ßCC inhibited both DXS transcript accumulation and DXS activity. Molecular models suggested that ßCC binds to DXS at the binding site for the thymine pyrophosphate cofactor and blocks catalysis, which was confirmed by direct assays of ßCC with the purified DXS protein in vitro. Another intermediate of the MEP pathway, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-2, 4-cyclodiphosphate, which is known to stimulate salicylate defense signaling, showed greater accumulation and enhanced export out of the plastid in response to simulated herbivory. Together, our work implicates ßCC as a signal of herbivore damage in Arabidopsis that increases defense and decreases flux through the MEP pathway, a pathway involved in growth and carbon assimilation.

Taxonomía y filogenética de Rhinosporidium seeberi, un patógeno para el ser humano y los animales: revisión crítica / The taxonomy and phylogenetics of the human and animal pathogen Rhinosporidium seeberi: a critical review

Rhinosporidum seeberi es el agente etiológico de la rinosporidiosis, una enfermedad de las membranas mucosas y, con menos frecuencia, de la piel y otros tejidos. Debido a que se resiste a crecer en los medios de cultivo desde hace más de 100 años, la identidad taxonómica de R. seeberi ha sido motivo de controversia. Tres nuevas hipótesis en una larga lista de puntos de vista similares han sido introducidas: 1) la cianobacteria Microcystis es el agente etiológico de la rinosporidiosis, 2) R. seeberi es un patógeno eucariota en los Mesomycetozoa, y 3) R. seeberi es un hongo. La literatura revisada sobre los estudios realizados con microscopia electrónica, los datos histopatológico y, más recientemente, los datos de varios estudios moleculares, apoyan fuertemente la idea de que R. seeberi es un patógeno eucariota, pero no un hongo. La semejanza morfológica propuesta por algunos de que R. seeberi es similar a los miembros de los géneros Microcystis (bacteria), Synchytrium y Colletotrichum (hongos) es meramente hipotética y no tiene el rigor científico necesario para validar el sistema propuesto. Un aspecto fundamental en contra de la teoría procariota es la presencia de núcleos descrita por numerosos autores y que actualizamos en esta revisión. Además, las características ultra-estructurales de los géneros Microcystis y Synchytrium y de sus ciclos celulares no han sido encontradas en la fase parasitaria de R. seeberi. La amplificación por PCR de una secuencia del rADN 16S típica de las cianobacterias en muestras de casos de rinosporidiosis, aunque interesante, será considerada en esta revisión como una anomalía debido a la contaminación con el medio ambiente (Microcystis) o tal vez como una adquisición endosimbiótica de plastidios a partir de cianobacterias ancestrales. Así pues, aunque R. seeberi podría poseer ADN procariota, esto no demuestra necesariamente que R. seeberi sea una cianobacteria. La clasificación de R. seeberi dentro de los hongos es insostenible. El aislamiento de un hongo, los análisis de ADN realizados, y la ausencia de controles apropiados son los problemas más importantes de esta teoría. Más estudios serán necesarios para validar la adquisición de plastidios procariotas en R. seeberi, y otros temas que requieren un cuidadoso escrutinio(AU)

Rhinosporidum seeberi is the etiologic agent of rhinosporidiosis, a disease of mucous membranes and infrequent of the skin and other tissues of humans and animals. Because it resists culture, for more than 100 years true taxonomic identity of R. seeberi has been controversial. Three hypotheses in a long list of related views have been recently introduced: 1) a prokaryote cyanobacterium in the genus Microcystis is the etiologic agent of rhinosporidiosis, 2) R. seeberi is a eukaryote pathogen in the Mesomycetozoa and 3) R. seeberi is a fungus. The reviewed literature on the electron microscopic, the histopathological and more recently the data from several molecular studies strongly support the view that R. seeberi is a eukaryote pathogen, but not a fungus. The suggested morphological resemblance of R. seeberi with the genera Microcystis (bacteria), Synchytrium and Colletotrichum (fungi) by different teams is merely hypothetical and lacked the scientific rigor needed to validate the proposed systems. A fundamental aspect against the prokaryote theory is the presence of nuclei reported by numerous authors and updated in this review. Moreover, Microcystis's and Synchytrium's ultra-structural and key cell cycle traits cannot be found in R. seeberi parasitic phase. The PCR amplification of a cyanobacteria 16S rDNA sequence from cases of rhinosporidiosis, while intriguing, will be viewed here as an anomaly due to contamination with environmental Microcystis or perhaps as an endosymbiotic acquisition of plastids from cyanobacteria ancestors. Thus, even if R. seeberi possesses prokaryote DNA, this does not prove that R. seeberi is a cyanobacterium. The placement of R. seeberi within the fungi is scientifically untenable. The isolation and the DNA analysis performed in a fungal strain, and the lack of appropriate controls are the main problems of this claim. Further studies are needed to validate R. seeberi's acquisition of prokaryote plastids and other issues that still need careful scrutiny(AU)

Pep1, a secreted effector protein of Ustilago maydis, is required for successful invasion of plant cells.

The basidiomycete Ustilago maydis causes smut disease in maize. Colonization of the host plant is initiated by direct penetration of cuticle and cell wall of maize epidermis cells. The invading hyphae are surrounded by the plant plasma membrane and proliferate within the plant tissue. We identified a novel secreted protein, termed Pep1, that is essential for penetration. Disruption mutants of pep1 are not affected in saprophytic growth and develop normal infection structures. However, Deltapep1 mutants arrest during penetration of the epidermal cell and elicit a strong plant defense response. Using Affymetrix maize arrays, we identified 116 plant genes which are differentially regulated in Deltapep1 compared to wild type infections. Most of these genes are related to plant defense. By in vivo immunolocalization, live-cell imaging and plasmolysis approaches, we detected Pep1 in the apoplastic space as well as its accumulation at sites of cell-to-cell passages. Site-directed mutagenesis identified two of the four cysteine residues in Pep1 as essential for function, suggesting that the formation of disulfide bridges is crucial for proper protein folding. The barley covered smut fungus Ustilago hordei contains an ortholog of pep1 which is needed for penetration of barley and which is able to complement the U. maydis Deltapep1 mutant. Based on these results, we conclude that Pep1 has a conserved function essential for establishing compatibility that is not restricted to the U. maydis / maize interaction.