Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.120
Filter
1.
Crit Care Explor ; 6(7): e1104, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957212

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) frequently occurs in patients with cardiac arrest. Diagnosis of VAP after cardiac arrest remains challenging, while the use of current biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin (PCT) is debated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate biomarkers' impact in helping VAP diagnosis after cardiac arrest. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a prospective ancillary study of the randomized, multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled ANtibiotherapy during Therapeutic HypothermiA to pRevenT Infectious Complications (ANTHARTIC) trial evaluating the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent VAP in out-of-hospital patients with cardiac arrest secondary to shockable rhythm and treated with therapeutic hypothermia. An adjudication committee blindly evaluated VAP according to predefined clinical, radiologic, and microbiological criteria. All patients with available biomarker(s), sample(s), and consent approval were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main endpoint was to evaluate the ability of biomarkers to correctly diagnose and predict VAP within 48 hours after sampling. The secondary endpoint was to study the combination of two biomarkers in discriminating VAP. Blood samples were collected at baseline on day 3. Routine and exploratory panel of inflammatory biomarkers measurements were blindly performed. Analyses were adjusted on the randomization group. RESULTS: Among 161 patients of the ANTHARTIC trial with available biological sample(s), patients with VAP (n = 33) had higher body mass index and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, more unwitnessed cardiac arrest, more catecholamines, and experienced more prolonged therapeutic hypothermia duration than patients without VAP (n = 121). In univariate analyses, biomarkers significantly associated with VAP and showing an area under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.70 were CRP (AUC = 0.76), interleukin (IL) 17A and 17C (IL17C) (0.74), macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 (0.73), PCT (0.72), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) (0.71). Multivariate analysis combining novel biomarkers revealed several pairs with p value of less than 0.001 and odds ratio greater than 1: VEGF-A + IL12 subunit beta (IL12B), Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligands (Flt3L) + C-C chemokine 20 (CCL20), Flt3L + IL17A, Flt3L + IL6, STAM-binding protein (STAMBP) + CCL20, STAMBP + IL6, CCL20 + 4EBP1, CCL20 + caspase-8 (CASP8), IL6 + 4EBP1, and IL6 + CASP8. Best AUCs were observed for CRP + IL6 (0.79), CRP + CCL20 (0.78), CRP + IL17A, and CRP + IL17C. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our exploratory study shows that specific biomarkers, especially CRP combined with IL6, could help to better diagnose or predict early VAP occurrence in cardiac arrest patients.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Hypothermia, Induced , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Procalcitonin , Humans , Biomarkers/blood , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/blood , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Male , Female , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , Prospective Studies , Procalcitonin/blood , Double-Blind Method , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Heart Arrest/blood , Predictive Value of Tests
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 64(1): 107190, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have been reported increasingly over the past few years. Many in-vivo and in-vitro studies have suggested a possible role of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of CRAB infections. METHODS: This multi-centre, retrospective study included patients treated with intravenous fosfomycin for severe infections caused by CRAB admitted consecutively to four hospitals in Italy from December 2017 to December 2022. The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in the study population. A propensity score matched analysis was added to the model. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with severe infections caused by CRAB treated with an intravenous fosfomycin-containing regimen were enrolled in this study. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was diagnosed in 59% of patients, primary bacteraemia in 22% of patients, and central-venous-catheter-related infection in 16% of patients. All patients were treated with a regimen containing intravenous fosfomycin, mainly in combination with cefiderocol (n=54), colistin (n=48) or ampicillin/sulbactam (n=18). Forty-eight (47%) patients died within 30 days. Fifty-eight (57%) patients experienced clinical therapeutic failure. Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes, primary bacteraemia and a colistin-containing regimen were independently associated with 30-day mortality, whereas adequate source control of infection, early 24-h active in-vitro therapy, and a cefiderocol-containing regimen were associated with survival. A colistin-based regimen, A. baumannii colonization and primary bacteraemia were independently associated with clinical failure. Conversely, adequate source control of infection, a cefiderocol-containing regimen, and early 24-h active in-vitro therapy were associated with clinical success. CONCLUSIONS: Different antibiotic regimens containing fosfomycin in combination can be used for treatment of severe infections caused by CRAB.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Administration, Intravenous , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carbapenems , Fosfomycin , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Sulbactam , Humans , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/mortality , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Aged , Middle Aged , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Sulbactam/therapeutic use , Sulbactam/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Colistin/therapeutic use , Colistin/administration & dosage , Italy , Ampicillin/therapeutic use , Ampicillin/administration & dosage , Cefiderocol , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Therapy, Combination , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
3.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1385118, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784576

ABSTRACT

Background: This study aimed to explore the risk factors for failed treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventilator-associated pneumonia (CRAB-VAP) with tigecycline and to establish a predictive model to predict the incidence of failed treatment and the prognosis of CRAB-VAP. Methods: A total of 189 CRAB-VAP patients were included in the safety analysis set from two Grade 3 A national-level hospitals between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022. The risk factors for failed treatment with CRAB-VAP were identified using univariate analysis, multivariate logistic analysis, and an independent nomogram to show the results. Results: Of the 189 patients, 106 (56.1%) patients were in the successful treatment group, and 83 (43.9%) patients were in the failed treatment group. The multivariate logistic model analysis showed that age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.07, p = 0.001), yes. of hypoproteinemia (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.20, 4.90, p = 0.013), the daily dose of 200 mg (OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.07, 5.00, p = 0.034), yes. of medication within 14 days prior to surgical intervention (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.19, 7.44, p = 0.019), and no. of microbial clearance (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.70, p = 0.005) were risk factors for the failure of tigecycline treatment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the AUC area of the prediction model was 0.745 (0.675-0.815), and the decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the model was effective in clinical practice. Conclusion: Age, hypoproteinemia, daily dose, medication within 14 days prior to surgical intervention, and microbial clearance are all significant risk factors for failed treatment with CRAB-VAP, with the nomogram model indicating that high age was the most important factor. Because the failure rate of CRAB-VAP treatment with tigecycline was high, this prediction model can help doctors correct or avoid risk factors during clinical treatment.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carbapenems , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Tigecycline , Treatment Failure , Humans , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Risk Factors , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Logistic Models , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Tigecycline/therapeutic use , Adult , Retrospective Studies , China , Drug Resistance, Bacterial
4.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 213, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698403

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) presents a significant challenge in intensive care units (ICUs). Nebulized antibiotics, particularly colistin and tobramycin, are commonly prescribed for VAP patients. However, the appropriateness of using inhaled antibiotics for VAP remains a subject of debate among experts. This study aims to provide updated insights on the efficacy of adjunctive inhaled colistin and tobramycin through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A thorough search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, COCHRANE Central, and clinical trials databases ( www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ) from inception to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting specific inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. These criteria included mechanically ventilated patients diagnosed with VAP, intervention with inhaled Colistin and Tobramycin compared to intravenous antibiotics, and reported outcomes such as clinical cure, microbiological eradication, mortality, or adverse events. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 106 records, from which only seven RCTs fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a higher likelihood of achieving both clinical and microbiological cure in the groups receiving tobramycin or colistin compared to the control group. The relative risk (RR) for clinical cure was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.45), and for microbiological cure, it was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.31, 2.06). However, there were no significant differences in mortality or the probability of adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive inhaled tobramycin or colistin may have a positive impact on the clinical and microbiological cure rates of VAP. However, the overall quality of evidence is low, indicating a high level of uncertainty. These findings underscore the need for further rigorous and well-designed studies to enhance the quality of evidence and provide more robust guidance for clinical decision-making in the management of VAP.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Colistin , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Tobramycin , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Tobramycin/administration & dosage , Colistin/administration & dosage , Administration, Inhalation , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Intensive Care Units , Treatment Outcome , Respiration, Artificial
5.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 43(8): 725-730, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired and nosocomial lower-respiratory-tract infections in critically ill pediatric patients require early appropriate antibiotic therapy to optimize outcomes. Using blind bronchial samples, we assessed the diagnostic performance of the rapid-multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay BioFire Pneumonia plus Panel vs. reference standard culturing with antimicrobial susceptibility testing. METHODS: For this prospective observational study in a single pediatric intensive care unit, we included consecutive patients younger than 18 years admitted for suspected community-, hospital- or ventilator-associated pneumonia in 2021-2022. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the multiplex PCR assay were determined. The kappa coefficient was computed to assess agreement, and univariate analyses were done to identify factors associated with discrepancies between the 2 diagnostic methods. RESULTS: Of the 36 included patients (median age, 1.4 years; interquartile range, 0.2-9.2), 41.7%, 27.8%, and 30.5% had community-, hospital- and ventilator-associated pneumonia, respectively. The overall κ was 0.74, indicating good agreement. Overall, the sensitivity of the multiplex PCR assay was 92% (95% CI: 77%-98%) and specificity 95% (95% CI: 92%-97%), with variations across microorganisms. The median time from sample collection to antimicrobial susceptibility test results was 3.9 (2.5-15) hours with the multiplex PCR assay and 60.5 (47.6-72.2) hours with the reference technique. CONCLUSION: The BioFire Pneumonia plus Panel used to test blind bronchial samples had satisfactory diagnostic performance in critically ill pediatric patients. The rapid results provided by this test may improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy and help minimize the use of antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Child , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Bronchi/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Adolescent
6.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 64(1): 107186, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688353

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and the development of new antibiotics have complicated the selection of optimal regimens. International guidelines are valuable tools, but are limited by the scarcity of high-quality randomized trials in many situations. METHODS: A panel of experts from the French and Italian Societies of Infectious Diseases aimed to address unresolved issues in clinical practice based on their experience, an updated literature review and open discussions. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus for the following 'first choices': (i) cefepime for ventilator-acquired pneumonia due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (ii) the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination most active in vitro, or cefiderocol combined with fosfomycin, and aerosolized colistin or aminoglycosides, for severe pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam; (iii) high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam (including loading dose and continuous infusion) for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L; (iv) high-dose cefepime for cUTIs due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales other than Enterobacter spp. if cefepime MIC ≤2 mg/L; (v) ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales; (vi) ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam plus metronidazole for IAIs due to metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (vii) ampicillin-sulbactam plus colistin for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; (viii) meropenem-vaborbactam for BSIs caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; and (ix) ceftazidime-avibactam plus fosfomycin for neurological infections caused by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: These expert choices were based on the necessary balance between antimicrobial stewardship principles and the need to provide optimal treatment for individual patients in each situation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Italy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Drug Combinations , France , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Cefepime/therapeutic use , Cefepime/pharmacology , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Colistin/therapeutic use , Colistin/pharmacology , Tazobactam , Ceftazidime , Azabicyclo Compounds
7.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 62(7): 339-344, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606856

ABSTRACT

High-dose tigecycline is gradually being introduced for the treatment of serious infectious diseases due to the increasing difficulty in treating pan-resistant bacterial infections. However, the safety of high-dose tigecycline is controversial. We report the case of a 76-year-old female patient with cerebral hemorrhage who received high-dose tigecycline (100 mg q12h) with other drugs for ventilator-associated pneumonia. 25 days after admission, she developed acute liver failure, mainly manifested by abnormally high bilirubin, coagulation dysfunction, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage with hemorrhagic shock. According to the updated Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method, the patient's acute liver injury was most likely caused by tigecycline.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Liver Failure, Acute , Tigecycline , Humans , Female , Aged , Tigecycline/administration & dosage , Tigecycline/adverse effects , Liver Failure, Acute/chemically induced , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Minocycline/adverse effects , Minocycline/administration & dosage , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy
8.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 43(6): 1149-1160, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634975

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We assessed the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol (CFDC) in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections (BSI). MATERIALS/METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adults with CRAB-BSI. Outcomes were mortality, clinical cure and adverse events during therapy. The average treatment effect of CFDC compared to COL was weighted with the inverse-probability treatment weight (IPTW). RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients were included (50 CFDC, 54 COL), median age 66.5 years, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 5, septic shock in 33.6% of patients. Primary BSI accounted for 43.3% of cases, followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (26%), catheter-related BSI (20.2%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (9.6%). Although not significantly, mortality at all time points was lower for CFDC than COL, while clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL (66% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.027). Adverse events were more frequent in COL than CFDC-group (38.8% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), primarily attributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in the COL group. Patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP treated with CFDC had a significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than COL (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0008, respectively). Increment of CCI (p = 0.005), ICU (p = 0.025), SARS-CoV2 (p = 0.006) and ECMO (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with 30-d mortality, while receiving CFDC was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: CFDC could represent an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteremia , COVID-19 , Carbapenems , Cefiderocol , Humans , Aged , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/mortality , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/mortality , Bacteremia/microbiology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/complications , Colistin/therapeutic use , Colistin/adverse effects , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Aged, 80 and over , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality
9.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e077428, 2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604633

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate all-cause mortality in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and determine whether antibiotic duration beyond 8 days is associated with reduction in all-cause mortality in patients admitted with VAP in the intensive care unit. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with VAP based on the National Healthcare Safety Network definition and clinical criteria. SETTING: Single tertiary care hospital in Southern India. PARTICIPANTS: 100 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with VAP were followed up for 28 days postdiagnosis or until discharge. OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of mortality at 28 days postdiagnosis was measured. Tests for association and predictors of mortality were determined using χ2 test and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included baseline clinical parameters such as age, underlying comorbidities as well as measuring total length of stay, number of ventilator-free days and antibiotic-free days. RESULTS: The overall case fatality rate due to VAP was 46%. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between those receiving shorter antibiotic duration (5-8 days) and those on longer therapy. Among those who survived until day 9, the observed risk difference was 15.1% between both groups, with an HR of 1.057 (95% CI 0.26 to 4.28). In 70.4% of isolates, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli were identified, of which the most common pathogen isolated was Acinetobacter baumannii (62%). CONCLUSION: In this hospital-based cohort study, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that prolonging antibiotic duration beyond 8 days in patients with VAP improves survival.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Adult , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Intensive Care Units , India/epidemiology , Critical Care
10.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 57(3): 480-489, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38471985

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for applying the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FAPP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains undefined, and there are limited data on its impact on antimicrobial stewardship. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a referral hospital in Taiwan from November 2019 to October 2022. Adult ICU patients with HAP/VAP who underwent FAPP testing were enrolled. Patient data, FAPP results, conventional microbiological testing results, and the real-world impact of FAPP results on antimicrobial therapy adjustments were assessed. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive factors for bacterial detection by FAPP. RESULTS: Among 592 respiratory specimens, including 564 (95.3%) endotracheal aspirate specimens, 19 (3.2%) expectorated sputum specimens and 9 (1.5%) bronchoalveolar lavage specimens, from 467 patients with HAP/VAP, FAPP testing yielded 368 (62.2%) positive results. Independent predictors for positive bacterial detection by FAPP included prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 3.14), recent admissions (OR, 1.59), elevated C-reactive protein levels (OR, 1.85), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (OR, 1.58), and septic shock (OR, 1.79). Approximately 50% of antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria and 58.4% for Gram-positive bacteria were adjusted or confirmed after obtaining FAPP results. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several factors predicting bacterial detection by FAPP in critically ill patients with HAP/VAP. More than 50% real-world clinical practices were adjusted or confirmed based on the FAPP results. Clinical algorithms for the use of FAPP and antimicrobial stewardship guidelines may further enhance its benefits.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Taiwan , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/drug therapy , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/microbiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Adult , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/genetics
12.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 25(3): 221-224, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466941

ABSTRACT

Background: Pneumonia is the most common intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infection and source of potential sepsis in ICU populations but can be difficult to diagnose in real-time. Despite limited data, rapid initiation of antibiotic agents is endorsed by society guidelines. We hypothesized that a post hoc analysis of a recent randomized pilot study would show no difference between two antibiotic initiation strategies. Patients and Methods: The recent Trial of Antibiotic Restraint in Presumed Pneumonia (TARPP) was a pragmatic cluster-randomized pilot of antibiotic initiation strategies for patients with suspected ICU-acquired pneumonia. Participating ICUs were cluster-randomized to either an immediate initiation protocol or a specimen-initiated protocol where a gram stain was required for initiation of antibiotics. Patients in the study were divided into one of seven mutually exclusive outcome rankings (desirability of outcome ranking; DOOR): (1) Survival, No Pneumonia, No adverse events; (2) Survival, Pneumonia, No adverse events; (3) Survival, No Pneumonia, ventilator-free-alive days ≤14; (4) Survival, Pneumonia, ventilator-free-alive days ≤14; (5) Survival, No Pneumonia, Subsequent episode of suspected pneumonia; (6) Survival, Pneumonia, Subsequent episode of suspected pneumonia; and (7) Death. These rankings were further refined using the duration of antibiotics prescribed for pneumonia (response adjusted for antibiotic risk; RADAR). Results: There were 186 patients enrolled in the study. After applying the DOOR analysis, a randomly selected patient was equally likely to have a better outcome in specimen-initiated arm as in the immediate initiation arm (DOOR probability: 50.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42.7%-58.9%). Outcome probabilities were similar after applying the RADAR analysis (52.5%; 95% CI, 44.2%-60.6%; p = 0.31). Conclusions: We found that patients for whom antibiotic agents were withheld until there was objective evidence (specimen-initiated group) had similar outcome rankings to patients for whom antibiotic agents were started immediately. This supports the findings of the TARPP pilot trial and provides further evidence for equipoise between these two treatment strategies.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Intensive Care Units
14.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 40, 2024 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317262

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) due to wild-type AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (wtAE) is frequent in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Despite a low level of evidence, definitive antimicrobial therapy (AMT) with third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) or piperacillin is discouraged. METHODS: Observational prospective study including consecutive wtAE VAP patients in 20 French ICUs. The primary objective was to assess the association of the choice of definitive AMT, i.e. piperacillin ± tazobactam (PTZ), 3GCs or other molecule (4GCs, carbapenems, quinolones, cotrimoxazole; control group), with treatment success at day-7. Recurrence of infection was collected as a secondary outcome, and analyzed accounting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: From February 2021 to June 2022, 274 patients were included. Enterobacter cloacae was the most prevalent specie (31%). Seventy-eight patients (28%) had PTZ as definitive AMT while 44 (16%) had 3GCs and 152 (56%) were classified in the control group. Day-7 success rate was similar between the 3 groups (74% vs. 73% vs. 68% respectively, p = 0.814). Recurrence probability at day-28 was 31% (95% CI 21-42), 40% (95% CI 26-55) and 21% (95% CI 15-28) for PTZ, 3GCs and control groups (p = 0.020). In multivariable analysis, choice of definitive AMT was not associated with clinical success, but definitive AMT with 3GCs was associated with recurrence at day-28 [csHR(95%CI) 10.9 (1.92-61.91)]. CONCLUSION: Choice of definitive antimicrobial therapy was not associated with treatment success at day 7. However, recurrence of pneumonia at day-28 was higher in patients treated with third generation cephalosporins with no differences in mortality or mechanical ventilation duration.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Critical Illness/therapy , Piperacillin/therapeutic use , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Intensive Care Units
15.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 49, 2024 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373973

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nebulisation of antibiotics is a promising treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. Ensuring effective antibiotic concentrations at the site of infection in the interstitial space fluid is crucial for clinical outcomes. Current assessment methods, such as epithelial lining fluid and tissue homogenates, have limitations in providing longitudinal pharmacokinetic data. MAIN BODY: Lung microdialysis, an invasive research technique predominantly used in animals, involves inserting probes into lung parenchyma to measure antibiotic concentrations in interstitial space fluid. Lung microdialysis offers unique advantages, such as continuous sampling, regional assessment of antibiotic lung concentrations and avoidance of bronchial contamination. However, it also has inherent limitations including the cost of probes and assay development, the need for probe calibration and limited applicability to certain antibiotics. As a research tool in VAP, lung microdialysis necessitates specialist techniques and resource-intensive experimental designs involving large animals undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, its potential impact on advancing our understanding of nebulised antibiotics for VAP is substantial. The technique may enable the investigation of various factors influencing antibiotic lung pharmacokinetics, including drug types, delivery devices, ventilator settings, interfaces and disease conditions. Combining in vivo pharmacokinetics with in vitro pharmacodynamic simulations can become feasible, providing insights to inform nebulised antibiotic dose optimisation regimens. Specifically, it may aid in understanding and optimising the nebulisation of polymyxins, effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, lung microdialysis holds promise in exploring novel nebulisation therapies, including repurposed antibiotic formulations, bacteriophages and immunomodulators. The technique's potential to monitor dynamic biochemical changes in pneumonia, such as cytokines, metabolites and inflammation/infection markers, opens avenues for developing theranostic tools tailored to critically ill patients with VAP. CONCLUSION: In summary, lung microdialysis can be a potential transformative tool, offering real-time insights into nebulised antibiotic pharmacokinetics. Its potential to inform optimal dosing regimen development based on precise target site concentrations and contribute to development of theranostic tools positions it as key player in advancing treatment strategies for VAP caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. The establishment of international research networks, exemplified by LUMINA (lung microdialysis applied to nebulised antibiotics), signifies a proactive step towards addressing complexities and promoting multicentre experimental studies in the future.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Animals , Humans , Microdialysis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Lung/metabolism , Respiration, Artificial
18.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 129: 111513, 2024 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301411

ABSTRACT

Interleukin-36 (IL-36) cytokine family members play an immunomodulatory function to immune cells through IL-36 receptor signaling pathway. However, the regulatory role of IL-36 exerted on T cells is not completely elucidated in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). For this purpose, this study enrolled 51 VAP patients and 27 controls. IL-36 levels were measured by ELISA. The mRNA levels of IL-36 receptor subunits were determined by real-time PCR. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were enriched, and stimulated with recombinant IL-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36RA). The influence of IL-36RA on transcription factors and cytokine secretions by CD4+ T cells was investigated. The modulatory function of IL-36RA on CD8+ T cells was assessed by measuring target cell death and cytokine secretions. There were no significant differences in serum IL-36 levels between VAP patients and controls. Only IL-36RA, but not IL-36α, IL-36ß, or IL-36γ, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was elevated in infection site of VAP patients. IL-36 receptor subunits in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were comparable between VAP patients and controls. 10 ng/mL of IL-36RA stimulation dampened peripheral effector CD4+ T cell response isolated from both VAP patients and controls. Target cell death mediated by CD8+ T cells isolated from BAFL of VAP patients was suppressed by 100 ng/mL of IL-36RA stimulation in vitro. The down-regulations of perforin, granzyme B, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, and Fas ligand following IL-36RA stimulation in vitro were responsible for reduced CD8+ T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. IL-36RA revealed an immunosuppressive property for T cell response in vitro, and may be involved in the protective mechanism in VAP patients.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Interleukins/metabolism , Cytokines , Lung/metabolism
19.
Future Microbiol ; 19(6): 465-480, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252038

ABSTRACT

Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are common healthcare-associated infections linked to high morbidity and mortality. Gram-negative pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, exhibit multidrug resistance and are recognized as major public health concerns, particularly among critically ill patients with HABP/VABP. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel combination antibacterial agent comprising ceftolozane (a potent antipseudomonal cephalosporin) and tazobactam (a ß-lactamase inhibitor). Phase III trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of ceftolozane/tazobactam to comparators, leading to the approval of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and nosocomial pneumonia. In this article, we review the clinical trial evidence and key real-world effectiveness data of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious healthcare-associated Gram-negative infections, focusing on patients with HABP/VABP.


Highlights from a review of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious infectionsSerious infections that can affect people in hospitals can cause serious illness or loss of life. Antibiotics are a type of medicine designed to kill the bacteria that cause these infections. However, bacteria have evolved over time, which means that antibiotics are not as effective at killing the bacteria and treating the infection. This is known as antibiotic resistance. To treat serious infections in hospital, there is a need for new antibiotics that can overcome this resistance and successfully fight off bacteria. This paper looks at an antibiotic known as ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), which can be used to treat people with serious infections that are picked up in hospitals. Clinical and laboratory studies have been reviewed to evaluate how effective, safe, and suitable C/T is for patients. The studies discussed in this paper highlight how well C/T works in people with serious infections, including those who are already ill and have been put on a ventilator to help with their breathing. Some of these studies showed that C/T worked well against lots of different types of bacteria that are known to cause serious infections in hospital and are linked to a high risk of death. Antibiotic resistance is a major problem all over the world. There is a need for effective antibiotics that can treat a range of infections caused by resistant bacteria. The results of this paper show that there is a lot of evidence to support the use of C/T in hospitals for people with serious bacterial infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cephalosporins , Tazobactam , Humans , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Tazobactam/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/drug therapy , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
20.
Lancet Respir Med ; 12(5): 399-408, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospitalisation, excessive antibiotic use and, consequently, increased antimicrobial resistance. In this phase 4, randomised trial, we aimed to establish whether a pragmatic, individualised, short-course antibiotic treatment strategy for VAP was non-inferior to usual care. METHODS: We did an individually randomised, open-label, hierarchical non-inferiority-superiority trial in 39 intensive care units in six hospitals in Nepal, Singapore, and Thailand. We enrolled adults (age ≥18 years) who met the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network criteria for VAP, had been mechanically ventilated for 48 h or longer, and were administered culture-directed antibiotics. In culture-negative cases, empirical antibiotic choices were made depending on local hospital antibiograms reported by the respective microbiology laboratories or prevailing local guidelines. Participants were assessed until fever resolution for 48 h and haemodynamic stability, then randomly assigned (1:1) to individualised short-course treatment (≤7 days and as short as 3-5 days) or usual care (≥8 days, with precise durations determined by the primary clinicians) via permuted blocks of variable sizes (8, 10, and 12), stratified by study site. Independent assessors for recurrent pneumonia and participants were masked to treatment allocation, but clinicians were not. The primary outcome was a 60-day composite endpoint of death or pneumonia recurrence. The non-inferiority margin was prespecified at 12% and had to be met by analyses based on both intention-to-treat (all study participants who were randomised) and per-protocol populations (all randomised study participants who fulfilled the eligibility criteria, met fitness criteria for antibiotic discontinuation, and who received antibiotics for the duration specified by their allocation group). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03382548. FINDINGS: Between May 25, 2018, and Dec 16, 2022, 461 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the short-course treatment group (n=232) or the usual care group (n=229). Median age was 64 years (IQR 51-74) and 181 (39%) participants were female. 460 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis after excluding one withdrawal (231 in the short-course group and 229 in the usual care group); 435 participants received the allocated treatment and fulfilled eligibility criteria, and were included in the per-protocol population. Median antibiotic treatment duration for the index episodes of VAP was 6 days (IQR 5-7) in the short-course group and 14 days (10-21) in the usual care group. 95 (41%) of 231 participants in the short-course group met the primary outcome, compared with 100 (44%) of 229 in the usual care group (risk difference -3% [one-sided 95% CI -∞ to 5%]). Results were similar in the per-protocol population. Non-inferiority of short-course antibiotic treatment was met in the analyses, although superiority compared with usual care was not established. In the per-protocol population, antibiotic side-effects occurred in 86 (38%) of 224 in the usual care group and 17 (8%) of 211 in the short-course group (risk difference -31% [95% CI -37 to -25%; p<0·0001]). INTERPRETATION: In this study of adults with VAP, individualised shortened antibiotic duration guided by clinical response was non-inferior to longer treatment durations in terms of 60-day mortality and pneumonia recurrence, and associated with substantially reduced antibiotic use and side-effects. Individualised, short-course antibiotic treatment for VAP could help to reduce the burden of side-effects and the risk of antibiotic resistance in high-resource and resource-limited settings. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council; Singapore National Medical Research Council. TRANSLATIONS: For the Thai and Nepali translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Singapore , Thailand , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...