Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.065
Filter
1.
Crit Care Explor ; 6(5): e1090, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of telementoring on caregiver performance during a high-fidelity medical simulation model (HFMSM) of a critically ill patient in a resource-limited setting. DESIGN: A two-center, randomized, controlled study using a HFMSM of a patient with community-acquired pneumonia complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome. SETTING: A notional clinic in a remote location staffed by a single clinician and nonmedical assistant. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians with limited experience managing critically ill patients. INTERVENTIONS: Telemedicine (TM) support. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was clinical performance as measured by accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of care. Secondary outcomes were patient survival, procedural quality, subjective assessment of the HFMSM, and perceived workload. MAIN RESULTS: TM participants (N = 11) performed better than non-TM (NTM, N = 12) in providing expected care (accuracy), delivering care more consistently (reliability), and without consistent differences in efficiency (timeliness of care). Accuracy: TM completed 91% and NTM 42% of expected tasks and procedures. Efficiency: groups did not differ in the mean (± sd) minutes it took to obtain an advanced airway successfully (TM 15.2 ± 10.5 vs. NTM 22.8 ± 8.4, p = 0.10) or decompress a tension pneumothorax with a needle (TM 0.7 ± 0.5 vs. NTM 0.6 ± 0.9, p = 0.65). TM was slower than NTM in completing thoracostomy (22.3 ± 10.2 vs. 12.3 ± 4.8, p = 0.03). Reliability: TM performed 13 of 17 (76%) tasks with more consistent timing than NTM. TM completed 68% and NTM 29% of procedural quality metrics. Eighty-two percent of the TM participants versus 17% of the NTM participants simulated patients survived (p = 0.003). The groups similarly perceived the HFMSM as realistic, managed their patients with personal ownership, and experienced comparable workload and stress. CONCLUSIONS: Remote expertise provided with TM to caregivers in resource-limited settings improves caregiver performance, quality of care, and potentially real patient survival. HFMSM can be used to study interventions in ways not possible with real patients.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Telemedicine , Humans , Telemedicine/methods , Caregivers/education , Caregivers/psychology , Male , Female , Adult , Clinical Competence , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Middle Aged , Critical Illness , Reproducibility of Results , Pneumonia/therapy
2.
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue ; 36(4): 364-368, 2024 Apr.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38813629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of prone position on the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The patients with severe pneumonia admitted to the ICU of Qingdao Municipal Hospital from May 2022 to August 2023 were enrolled. The general information, etiology, underlying diseases, vital signs and laboratory indicators at ICU admission, clinical treatment and prognosis during ICU hospitalization were collected. The above clinical data of patients with different prognosis were compared. Multifactorial Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the related factors affecting survival during ICU in patients with severe pneumonia. The change in oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) of patients with severe pneumonia were observed at 1 hour before the first prone position, 1 hour after the first prone position, and 1 hour after the end of the first prone position. The effect of prone position on oxygenation in patients with severe pneumonia was analyzed. Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation between the duration to first prone position and the change in the PaO2/FiO2 before and after prone position in patients with severe pneumonia. RESULTS: Finally, a total of 144 patients with severe pneumonia were enrolled, 45 survived and 99 died during ICU hospitalization, with a mortality of 68.8%. Compared with the survival group, the patients in the death group were older [years old: 81.00 (70.75, 86.00) vs. 71.00 (60.50, 81.50), P < 0.01], the proportion of pre-existing lung disease, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), blood lactic acid (Lac) and the ratio of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were higher [ratio of pre-existing lung disease: 23.2% (23/99) vs. 8.9% (4/45), HR (bpm): 99.61±22.47 vs. 91.49±18.76, RR (times/min): 22.50 (19.75, 29.25) vs. 20.00 (17.50, 24.50), Lac (mmol/L): 2.00 (1.55 , 3.25) vs. 1.60 (1.20, 1.95), CRRT ratio: 25.3% (25/99) vs. 6.7% (3/45), all P < 0.05], and the proportion of prone position was lower [41.4% (41/99) vs. 68.9% (31/45), P < 0.01]. Multifactorial Logistic regression analysis showed that age [odds ratio (OR) = 0.946, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.912-0.980, P = 0.002] and Lac (OR = 0.563, 95%CI was 0.340-0.930, P = 0.025) were negatively correlated with survival during ICU hospitalization in severe pneumonia patients, while prone position was positively correlated with survival (OR = 2.551, 95%CI was 1.067-6.095, P = 0.035), indicating that prone position was beneficial for improving ICU prognosis in severe pneumonia patients. The results of PaO2/FiO2 at different time points in prone position showed that PaO2/FiO2 at 1 hour of the first prone position in the patients with severe pneumonia was significantly higher than that at 1 hour before the first prone position [mmHg (1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 146.69 (113.92, 257.25) vs. 111.75 (70.15, 212.20), P < 0.01], indicating that the prone position had a relevant effect on the improvement of oxygenation in patients. Spearman correlation analysis showed that the duration of the first prone position in patients with severe pneumonia was significantly and positively correlated with the improvement of oxygenation at 1 hour of the first prone position (r = 0.565, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prone position is a therapeutic measure that can independently influence the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia during ICU hospitalization. The prone position effectively improves oxygenation in patients with severe pneumonia and the first change in oxygenation in patients is related to the duration of the prone position.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia , Humans , Prone Position , Retrospective Studies , Pneumonia/therapy , Prognosis , Male , Female
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(5): 959-961, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693426

ABSTRACT

Community-acquired pneumonia continues to be one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality due to infectious disease. The aetiologies, clinical presentations, diagnostic modalities and therapeutic options are changing and outpacing the creation of management guidelines. This educational article summarizes a roundtable activity sponsored by an unrestricted educational grant by Paratek that included US experts discussing these changes and identifying gaps in the current guidelines.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Pneumonia , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Humans , United States , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/therapy , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the successful conservative management of chemical pneumonitis and presumed acute respiratory distress syndrome in a cat secondary to inadvertent pulmonary polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) instillation. CASE SUMMARY: PEG-ELS is commonly used in small animals for bowel cleansing and to treat constipation. There have been several instances of aspiration or accidental instillation of this solution into the lungs of both people and dogs. PEG-ELS was inadvertently infused into the lungs of the cat in the current report. After 10 days in the ICU, during which time treatment with oxygen therapy, antibiosis, diuretics, and corticosteroids was provided, the cat was successfully discharged. NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of instillation of PEG-ELS in a cat resulting in chemical pneumonitis and lung injury. We describe the successful management of this condition with conservative management and without the need for invasive interventions such as bronchoscopy and lavage or mechanical ventilation.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Polyethylene Glycols , Cats , Animals , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Cat Diseases/chemically induced , Cat Diseases/therapy , Electrolytes/administration & dosage , Electrolytes/therapeutic use , Pneumonia/veterinary , Pneumonia/chemically induced , Pneumonia/therapy , Male , Female
5.
Crit Care Sci ; 36: e20240210en, 2024.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775567

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Driving pressure has been suggested to be the main driver of ventilator-induced lung injury and mortality in observational studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy can improve clinical outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan that will be used to test whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy including positive end-expiratory pressure titration according to the best respiratory compliance and reduction in tidal volume is superior to a standard strategy involving the use of the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in terms of increasing the number of ventilator-free days in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: The ventilator STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA (STAMINA) study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial that compares a driving pressure-limiting strategy to the ARDSnet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia admitted to intensive care units. We expect to recruit 500 patients from 20 Brazilian and 2 Colombian intensive care units. They will be randomized to a driving pressure-limiting strategy group or to a standard strategy using the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table. In the driving pressure-limiting strategy group, positive end-expiratory pressure will be titrated according to the best respiratory system compliance. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days. The secondary outcomes are in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality and the need for rescue therapies such as extracorporeal life support, recruitment maneuvers and inhaled nitric oxide. CONCLUSION: STAMINA is designed to provide evidence on whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy is superior to the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table strategy for increasing the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Prospective Studies , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Pneumonia/therapy , Brazil/epidemiology , Colombia/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Tidal Volume
6.
Malar J ; 23(1): 147, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750488

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Uganda, village health workers (VHWs) manage childhood illness under the integrated community case management (iCCM) strategy. Care is provided for malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhoea in a community setting. Currently, there is limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of iCCM in comparison to health facility-based management for childhood illnesses. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of the management of childhood illness using the VHW-led iCCM against health facility-based services in rural south-western Uganda. METHODS: Data on the costs and effectiveness of VHW-led iCCM versus health facility-based services for the management of childhood illness was collected in one sub-county in rural southwestern Uganda. Costing was performed using the ingredients approach. Effectiveness was measured as the number of under-five children appropriately treated. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated from the provider perspective. RESULTS: Based on the decision model for this study, the cost for 100 children treated was US$628.27 under the VHW led iCCM and US$87.19 for the health facility based services, while the effectiveness was 77 and 71 children treated for VHW led iCCM and health facility-based services, respectively. An ICER of US$6.67 per under five-year child treated appropriately for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea was derived for the provider perspective. CONCLUSION: The health facility based services are less costly when compared to the VHW led iCCM per child treated appropriately. The VHW led iCCM was however more effective with regard to the number of children treated appropriately for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea. Considering the public health expenditure per capita for Uganda as the willingness to pay threshold, VHW led iCCM is a cost-effective strategy. VHW led iCCM should, therefore, be enhanced and sustained as an option to complement the health facility-based services for treatment of childhood illness in rural contexts.


Subject(s)
Case Management , Community Health Workers , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Rural Population , Uganda , Humans , Community Health Workers/economics , Case Management/economics , Child, Preschool , Infant , Malaria/economics , Malaria/drug therapy , Diarrhea/therapy , Diarrhea/economics , Pneumonia/economics , Pneumonia/therapy , Health Facilities/economics , Health Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Male , Female , Community Health Services/economics
8.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 04 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675960

ABSTRACT

Reactivation and infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) are frequently observed in recipients of solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplants, and individuals with HIV infection. This presents an increasing risk of allograft rejection, opportunistic infection, graft failure, and patient mortality. Among immunocompromised hosts, interstitial pneumonia is the most critical clinical manifestation of CMV infection. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential therapeutic benefits of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC-exos) in preclinical models of acute lung injury, including pneumonia, ARDS, and sepsis. However, the role of MSC-exos in the pathogenesis of infectious viral diseases, such as CMV pneumonia, remains unclear. In a mouse model of murine CMV-induced pneumonia, we observed that intravenous administration of mouse MSC (mMSC)-exos reduced lung damage, decreased the hyperinflammatory response, and shifted macrophage polarization from the M1 to the M2 phenotype. Treatment with mMSC-exos also significantly reduced the infiltration of inflammatory cells and pulmonary fibrosis. Furthermore, in vitro studies revealed that mMSC-exos reversed the hyperinflammatory phenotype of bone marrow-derived macrophages infected with murine CMV. Mechanistically, mMSC-exos treatment decreased activation of the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway both in vivo and in vitro. In summary, our findings indicate that mMSC-exo treatment is effective in severe CMV pneumonia by reducing lung inflammation and fibrosis through the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway, thus providing promising therapeutic potential for clinical CMV infection.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Exosomes , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Muromegalovirus , NF-kappa B , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein , Signal Transduction , Animals , Exosomes/metabolism , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Mice , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/metabolism , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Muromegalovirus/physiology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Macrophages/immunology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Lung/virology , Lung/pathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Herpesviridae Infections/therapy , Herpesviridae Infections/virology , Herpesviridae Infections/immunology , Pneumonia/therapy , Pneumonia/virology
9.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 419, 2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644489

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the similarities and differences between patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and those with other community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), utilizing propensity score matching (PSM), regarding hospitalization expenses, treatment options, and prognostic outcomes, aiming to inform the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: Patients admitted to the ICU of the Third People's Hospital of Datong City, diagnosed with COVID-19 from December 2022 to February 2023, constituted the observation group, while those with other CAP admitted from January to November 2022 formed the control group. Basic information, clinical data at admission, and time from symptom onset to admission were matched using PSM. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included in the COVID-19 group and 119 in the CAP group. The patients were matched by the propensity matching method, and 37 patients were included in each of the last two groups. After matching, COVID-19 had a higher failure rate than CAP, but the difference was not statistically significant (73% vs. 51%, p = 0.055). The utilization rate of antiviral drugs (40% vs. 11%, p = 0.003), γ-globulin (19% vs. 0%, p = 0.011) and prone position ventilation (PPV) (27% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) in patients with COVID-19 were higher than those in the CAP, and the differences were statistically significant. The total hospitalization cost of COVID-19 patients was lower than that of CAP patients, and the difference was statistically significant (27889.5 vs. 50175.9, p = 0.007). The hospital stay for COVID-19 patients was shorter than for CAP patients, but the difference was not statistically significant (10.9 vs. 16.6, p = 0.071). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that limited medical resources influenced patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing substantial demands for ICU capacity and medications during this period could have potentially reduced the mortality rate among COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Community-Acquired Infections , Intensive Care Units , Propensity Score , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Male , Female , Community-Acquired Infections/mortality , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , China/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Prognosis , Pneumonia/mortality , Pneumonia/therapy
10.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 42(2): 231-247, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641389

ABSTRACT

Pneumonia is split into 3 diagnostic categories: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), health care-associated pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. This classification scheme is driven not only by the location of infection onset but also by the predominant associated causal microorganisms. Pneumonia is diagnosed in over 1.5 million US emergency department visits annually (1.2% of all visits), and most pneumonia diagnosed by emergency physicians is CAP.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Pneumonia , Humans , Pneumonia/therapy , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
12.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e082081, 2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684257

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe pneumonia (SP) stands as one of the most prevalent critical illnesses encountered in clinical practice, characterised by its rapid onset and progression, numerous complications and elevated mortality rates. While modern medical interventions primarily focus on symptomatic management such as anti-infective therapy and mechanical ventilation, challenges including high drug resistance and suboptimal therapeutic outcomes for certain patients persist. Dry cupping as an ancient practice with over a millennium of clinical use in China is renowned for its convenience and perceived clinical efficacy in various illnesses. Nevertheless, the lack of well-designed studies assessing its effects remains a notable gap in the literature. This protocol describes a placebo-controlled, randomised, single-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dry cupping as an adjuvant treatment for SP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 66 patients diagnosed with SP, aged 18-80 years, will be randomly divided into two groups: intervention group, receiving 10 times of dry cupping treatment; control group, receiving placebo dry cupping therapy. Both applications are used in bilateral Fei Shu (BL13), Pi Shu (BL21) and Shen Shu (BL22) cupping. The application will be conducted once a day for 10 days. Participants will be assessed before treatment (D0), after the first intervention (D1), after the fifth intervention (D5) and after treatment ended (D10). The assessments include blood oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, traditional Chinese medicine symptom score, inflammatory response, mechanical ventilation time and oxygen condition. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital (2023-7th-HIBR-070). The results of the study will be disseminated to participants through social networks and will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300076958.


Subject(s)
Cupping Therapy , Pneumonia , Humans , Single-Blind Method , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/therapy , Adult , Cupping Therapy/methods , Aged , Female , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Young Adult , Adolescent , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods , Aged, 80 and over , China , Treatment Outcome
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(6): 1718-1726, 2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of standard care (SoC) combined with supervised in-bed cycling (Bed-Cycle) or booklet exercises (Book-Exe) versus SoC in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 186 patients with CAP were assigned to SoC (n = 62), Bed-Cycle (n = 61), or Book-Exe (n = 63). Primary outcome length of stay (LOS) was analyzed with analysis of covariance. Secondary outcomes, 90-day readmission, and 180-day mortality were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard regression and readmission days with negative-binominal regression. RESULTS: LOS was -2% (95% CI: -24 to 25) and -1% (95% CI: -22 to 27) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe, compared with SoC. Ninety-day readmission was 35.6% for SoC, 27.6% for Bed-Cycle, and 21.3% for Book-Exe. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for 90-day readmission was 0.63 (95% CI: .33-1.21) and 0.54 (95% CI: .27-1.08) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC. aHR for 90-day readmission for combined exercise was 0.59 (95% CI: .33-1.03) compared with SoC. aHR for 180-day mortality was 0.84 (95% CI: .27-2.60) and 0.82 (95% CI: .26-2.55) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC. Number of readmission days was 226 for SoC, 161 for Bed-Cycle, and 179 for Book-Exe. Incidence rate ratio for readmission days was 0.73 (95% CI: .48-1.10) and 0.77 (95% CI: .51-1.15) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC. CONCLUSIONS: Although supervised exercise training during admission with CAP did not reduce LOS or mortality, this trial suggests its potential to reduce readmission risk and number of readmission days. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04094636.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Pneumonia , Humans , Community-Acquired Infections/mortality , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Male , Female , Aged , Pneumonia/mortality , Pneumonia/therapy , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Exercise Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Aged, 80 and over , Exercise/physiology
15.
Lancet Glob Health ; 12(5): e804-e814, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522443

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) for treatment of childhood severe pneumonia outside tertiary care hospitals is uncertain. We did a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial of locally made bCPAP compared with WHO-recommended low-flow oxygen therapy in children with severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia in general hospitals in Ethiopia. METHODS: This open, cluster-randomised trial was done in 12 general (secondary) hospitals in Ethiopia. We randomly assigned six hospitals to bCPAP as first-line respiratory support for children aged 1-59 months who presented with severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia and six hospitals to standard low-flow oxygen therapy. Cluster (hospital) randomisation was stratified by availability of mechanical ventilation. All children received treatment in paediatric wards (in a dedicated corner in front of a nursing station) with a similar level of facilities (equipment for oxygen therapy and medications) and staffing (overall, one nurse per six patients and one general practitioner per 18 patients) in all hospitals. All children received additional care according to WHO guidelines, supervised by paediatricians and general practitioners. The primary outcome was treatment failure (defined as any of the following: peripheral oxygen saturation <85% at any time after at least 1 h of intervention plus signs of respiratory distress; indication for mechanical ventilation; death during hospital stay or within 72 h of leaving hospital against medical advice; or leaving hospital against medical advice during intervention). The analysis included all children enrolled in the trial. We performed both unadjusted and adjusted analyses of the primary outcome, with the latter adjusted for the stratification variable and for the design effect of cluster randomisation, as well as selected potentially confounding variables, including age. We calculated effectiveness as the relative risk (RR) of the outcomes in the bCPAP group versus low-flow oxygen group. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03870243, and is completed. FINDINGS: From June 8, 2021, to July 27, 2022, 1240 children were enrolled (620 in hospitals allocated to bCPAP and 620 in hospitals allocated to low-flow oxygen). Cluster sizes ranged from 103 to 104 children. Five (0·8%) of 620 children in the bCPAP group had treatment failure compared with 21 (3·4%) of 620 children in the low-flow oxygen group (unadjusted RR 0·24, 95% CI 0·09-0·63, p=0·0015; adjusted RR 0·24, 0·07-0·87, p=0·030). Six children died during hospital stay, all of whom were in the low-flow oxygen group (p=0·031). No serious adverse events were attributable to bCPAP. INTERPRETATION: In Ethiopian general hospitals, introduction of locally made bCPAP, supervised by general practitioners and paediatricians, was associated with reduced risk of treatment failure and in-hospital mortality in children with severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia compared with use of standard low-flow oxygen therapy. Implementation research is required in higher mortality settings to consolidate our findings. FUNDING: SIDA Sweden and Grand Challenges Ethiopia.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia , Respiration Disorders , Humans , Child , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Ethiopia , Pneumonia/therapy , Hypoxia/therapy , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
17.
Intensive Care Med ; 50(4): 526-538, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546855

ABSTRACT

Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains one of the leading causes of admission to the intensive care unit, thus consuming a large share of resources and is associated with high mortality rates worldwide. The evidence generated by clinical studies in the last decade was translated into recommendations according to the first published guidelines focusing on severe community-acquired pneumonia. Despite the advances proposed by the present guidelines, several challenges preclude the prompt implementation of these diagnostic and therapeutic measures. The present article discusses the challenges for the broad implementation of the sCAP guidelines and proposes solutions when applicable.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Pneumonia , Humans , Pneumonia/therapy , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Intensive Care Units , Hospitalization
18.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 42(2): 338-346, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459974

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare management and documentation of vital signs, symptoms and infection severity in pneumonia patients seeking primary care and emergency care without referral. DESIGN: Medical record review of vital signs, examination findings and severity of pneumonia. SETTING: Primary and emergency care. SUBJECTS: Two hundred and forty patients diagnosed with pneumonia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vital signs, examination findings and severity of pneumonia. Assessments of pneumonia severity according to the reviewers, the traffic light score and CRB-65. RESULTS: Respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation were less often documented in primary care (p < .001). Chest X-ray was performed in 5% of primary care patients vs. 88% of emergency care patients (p < .01). Primary care patients had longer symptom duration, higher oxygen saturation and lower respiratory rate. In total, the reviewers assessed 63% of all pneumonias as mild and 9% as severe. The traffic light scoring model identified 11 patients (9%) in primary care and 53 patients (44%) in emergency care at high risk of severe infection. CONCLUSIONS: Vital signs were documented less often in primary care than in emergency care. Patients in primary care appear to have a less severe pneumonia, indicating attendance to the correct care level. The traffic light scoring model identified more patients at risk of severe infection than CRB-65, where the parameters were documented to a limited extent.


Pneumonia patients attending primary care have less affected vital signs than those attending emergency care.Vital signs were less documented in primary care than in emergency care.Patients with pneumonia seem to attend the correct level of care when they have the possibility to choose without a referral.CRB-65 was not possible to count in most primary care patients due to lack of documentation.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Pneumonia , Humans , Emergency Service, Hospital , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/therapy , Documentation , Referral and Consultation , Primary Health Care
19.
BMJ Open ; 14(3): e078404, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458789

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the prevalence and correlates of guideline non-adherence for common childhood illnesses in low-resource settings. DESIGN AND SETTING: We used secondary cross-sectional data from eight healthcare facilities in six Asian and African countries. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2796 children aged 2-23 months hospitalised between November 2016 and January 2019 with pneumonia, diarrhoea or severe malnutrition (SM) and without HIV infection were included in this study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We identified children treated with full, partial or non-adherent initial inpatient care according to site-specific standard-of-care guidelines for pneumonia, diarrhoea and SM within the first 24 hours of admission. Correlates of guideline non-adherence were identified using generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: Fully adherent care was delivered to 32% of children admitted with diarrhoea, 34% of children with pneumonia and 28% of children with SM when a strict definition of adherence was applied. Non-adherence to recommendations was most common for oxygen and antibiotics for pneumonia; fluid, zinc and antibiotics for diarrhoea; and vitamin A and zinc for SM. Non-adherence varied by site. Pneumonia guideline non-adherence was more likely among patients with severe disease (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.38, 2.34) compared with non-severe disease. Diarrhoea guideline non-adherence was more likely among lower asset quintile groups (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.01, 1.35), older children (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.06, 1.13) and children presenting with wasting (OR 6.44; 95% CI 4.33, 9.57) compared with those with higher assets, younger age and not wasted. CONCLUSIONS: Non-adherence to paediatric guidelines was common and associated with older age, disease severity, and comorbidities, and lower household economic status. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guidelines by adding clarity to specific recommendations.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Pneumonia , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Developing Countries , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals , Diarrhea/therapy , Diarrhea/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Pneumonia/therapy , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Zinc
20.
J Healthc Manag ; 69(2): 118-131, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467025

ABSTRACT

GOAL: Patients engaged in self-care through information technology can potentially improve the quality of healthcare they receive. This study aimed to examine how electronic health record (EHR) system functionalities help hospitals mediate the impact of patient engagement on quality outcomes-notably, readmission rates. METHODS: A pooled cross-sectional study design employed data containing 3,547 observations from general acute care hospitals (2014-2018). The breadth of patient engagement functionalities adopted by a hospital was used as the independent variable and the degree of EHR presence was used as the mediating variable. Mean time to readmission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pneumonia, and heart failure were the dependent variables. The Baron and Kenny method was used to test mediation. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Patient engagement was associated with reduced AMI readmission rates both directly and via EHR system presence. Mediation effects were present, in that a 1-unit increase in patient engagement through EHR system presence was associated with a 0.33% decrease in AMI readmission rates (p < .05). For other disease categories (heart failure and pneumonia), a significant effect was not found. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: For hospitals with a comprehensive EHR system, patient engagement through information technology can potentially reduce readmission rates for some diseases. More research is needed to determine which specific clinical conditions are amenable to quality improvement through patient engagement. Synergies between patient engagement functionalities and an EHR system positively affect quality outcomes. Therefore, practitioners and hospital managers should leverage hospital investments made in their EHR system infrastructure and use it to engage patients in self-care.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Myocardial Infarction , Pneumonia , Humans , United States , Patient Participation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Heart Failure/therapy , Pneumonia/therapy , Patient Readmission , Electronic Health Records
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...