Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.179
Filter
3.
RMD Open ; 10(2)2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-synovial inflammation as detected by MRI is characteristic in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) with potentially high diagnostic value. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to describe inflammatory MRI findings in the shoulder girdle of patients with PMR and discriminate from other causes of shoulder girdle pain. METHODS: Retrospective study of 496 contrast-enhanced MRI scans of the shoulder girdle from 122 PMR patients and 374 non-PMR cases. Two radiologists blinded to clinical and demographic information evaluated inflammation at six non-synovial plus three synovial sites for the presence or absence of inflammation. The prevalence of synovial and non-synovial inflammation, both alone and together with clinical information, was tested for its ability to differentiate PMR from non-PMR. RESULTS: A high prevalence of non-synovial inflammation was identified as striking imaging finding in PMR, in average 3.4±1.7, mean (M)±SD, out of the six predefined sites were inflamed compared with 1.1±1.4 (M±SD) in non-PMR group, p<0.001, with excellent discriminatory effect between PMR patients and non-PMR cases. The prevalence of synovitis also differed significantly between PMR patients and non-PMR cases, 2.5±0.8 (M±SD) vs 1.9±1.1 (M±SD) out of three predefined synovial sites, but with an inferior discriminatory effect. The detection of inflammation at three out of six predefined non-synovial sites differentiated PMR patients from controls with a sensitivity/specificity of 73.8%/85.8% and overall better performance than detection of synovitis alone (sensitivity/specificity of 86.1%/36.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the shoulder girdle is a reliable imaging tool with significant diagnostic value in the assessment of patients suffering from PMR and differentiation to other conditions for shoulder girdle pain.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Female , Male , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Synovitis/diagnostic imaging , Synovitis/diagnosis , Synovitis/etiology , Synovitis/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Inflammation/diagnostic imaging , Inflammation/diagnosis , Shoulder/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
RMD Open ; 10(1)2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The C reactive protein polymyalgia rheumatica activity score (CRP-PMR-AS) is a composite index that includes CRP levels and was developed specifically for PMR. As treatments such as interleukin-6 antagonists can normalise CRP levels, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of PMR-AS, the clinical (clin)-PMR-AS and the imputed-CRP (imp-CRP)-PMR-AS have been developed to avoid such bias. Our primary objective was to measure the correlation of these activity scores. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the concordance between different cutoffs of the PMR-ASs. METHOD: Data from the Safety and Efficacy of tocilizumab versus Placebo in Polymyalgia rHeumatica With glucocORticoid dEpendence (SEMAPHORE) trial, a superiority randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial, were subjected to post hoc analysis to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab versus placebo in patients with active PMR. The CRP-PMR-AS, ESR-PMR-AS, clin-PMR-AS and imp-CRP-PMR-AS were measured at every visit. The concordance and correlation between these scores were evaluated using kappa correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and scatter plots. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included in the SEMAPHORE trial, and 100 were analysed in this study. The correlation between the PMR-ASs was excellent, as the ICC and kappa were >0.85 from week 4 until week 24 (CRP-PMR-AS ≤10 or >10). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the differences between the CRP-PMR-AS and the other threescores were low. The cut-off values for the clin-PMR-AS were similar to those for the CRP-PMR-AS 86% of the time. CONCLUSION: The correlation between all the PMR-ASs was excellent, reflecting the low weight of CRP. In clinical trials using drugs that have an impact on CRP, the derived activity scores can be used. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTC02908217.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Blood Sedimentation
5.
Reumatismo ; 76(1)2024 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523578

ABSTRACT

The first description of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is generally attributed to Dr. Bruce. In an 1888 article entitled Senile rheumatic gout, he described five male patients aged from 60 to 74 years whom he had visited at the Strathpeffer spa in Scotland. In 1945, Dr. Holst and Dr. Johansen reported on five female patients examined over several months at the Medical Department of Roskilde County Hospital in Denmark. These patients suffered from hip, upper arms, and neck pain associated with elevated ESR and constitutional manifestations such as low-grade fever or loss of weight. In the same year, Meulengracht, another Danish physician, reported on two patients with shoulder pain and stiffness associated with fever, weight loss, and an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate. As in the five patients reported by Dr. Holst and Dr. Johansen, a prolonged recovery time was recorded. On reading and comparing these three accounts, we question whether it is correct to attribute the first description of PMR to Dr. Bruce and put forward shifting this accolade to the three Danish physicians.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Male , Female , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/complications , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Arm , Scotland , Fever , Denmark/epidemiology
6.
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs ; 29(1): 5-17, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180809

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: GCA (giant cell arteritis) and PMR (polymyalgia rheumatica) are two overlapping inflammatory rheumatic conditions that are seen exclusively in older adults, sharing some common features. GCA is a clinical syndrome characterized by inflammation of the medium and large arteries, with both cranial and extracranial symptoms. PMR is a clinical syndrome characterized by stiffness in the neck, shoulder, and pelvic girdle muscles. Both are associated with constitutional symptoms. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we assess the established and upcoming treatments for GCA and PMR. We review the current treatment landscape, completed trials, and upcoming trials in these conditions, to identify new and promising therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Early use of glucocorticoids (GC) remains integral to the immediate management of PMR and GCA but being aware of patient co-morbidities that may influence treatment toxicity is paramount. As such GC sparing agents are required in the treatment of PMR. Currently there are limited treatment options available for PMR and GCA, and significant unmet needs remain. Newer mechanisms of action, and hence therapeutic options being studied include CD4 T cell co-stimulation blockade, IL-17 inhibition, IL-12/23 inhibition, GM-CSF inhibition, IL-1ß inhibition, TNF-α antagonist and Jak inhibition, among others, which will be discussed in this review.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Aged , Giant Cell Arteritis/drug therapy , Giant Cell Arteritis/complications , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/complications , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Inflammation/drug therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
8.
Z Rheumatol ; 83(2): 112-121, 2024 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285216

ABSTRACT

Polymyalgia rheumatica is the second most frequent inflammatory rheumatic disease in people aged over 50 years, after rheumatoid arthritis. It is characterized by pain and morning stiffness in the region of the shoulders, hip girdle and neck. It can be associated with giant cell arteritis (CGA). Treatment with glucocorticoids is indispensable. The duration of treatment varies and often exceeds 1 year. The additive administration of methotrexate is an option for saving glucocorticoids. The biologicals tocilizumab or secukinumab are very promising alternatives. The course of treatment should be closely monitored for inflammation parameters, glucocorticoid side effects, pain, visual acuity, depression, activities of daily living and especially related to functions of the upper extremities. The geriatric assessment plays an important role in the management of this condition.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/drug therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Pain
9.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 224(1): 48-56, ene. 2024. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-EMG-530

ABSTRACT

La polimialgia reumática y la arteritis de células gigantes pueden suponer una emergencia médica en la que el retraso en su correcto diagnóstico y manejo terapéutico pueden asociar complicaciones graves. Con el objetivo de mejorar la atención de los pacientes con estas patologías en el entorno de la Comunidad de Madrid, se diseñó un estudio para identificar las causas y las posibles soluciones para hacer frente los problemas relacionados con el diagnóstico de estas patologías. Tras un análisis preliminar, se identificaron 11 áreas de mejora relacionadas con cuatro aspectos diferenciados del proceso asistencial: coordinación y protocolos, equipamientos, formación y concienciación sobre las patologías y experiencia del paciente. De todas ellas, se priorizó resolver aquellas relacionadas con la generación de protocolos de abordaje integral de las patologías y que contemplen todas las especialidades y niveles asistenciales implicados. Otro aspecto crucial es el incremento del grado de sospecha clínica de estas patologías. (AU)


Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis can be a medical emergency in which a delay in correct diagnosis and therapeutic management can cause serious complications. With the aim of improving the care of patients with these pathologies in the Community of Madrid, a study was designed to identify the causes and possible solutions to address the problems related to the diagnosis of these pathologies. After the analysis, 11 areas of improvement related to four different aspects of the care process were identified: coordination and protocols, equipment, training and awareness of pathologies, and patient experience. Of all the areas identified, it was considered a priority to resolve those related to the generation of protocols for the comprehensive management of the pathologies, which include all the specialties and levels of care involved. Another crucial aspect is the increase in the degree of clinical suspicion of these pathologies. (AU)


Subject(s)
Polymyalgia Rheumatica/complications , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/complications , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Patient Care
10.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 224(1): 48-56, ene. 2024. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-229912

ABSTRACT

La polimialgia reumática y la arteritis de células gigantes pueden suponer una emergencia médica en la que el retraso en su correcto diagnóstico y manejo terapéutico pueden asociar complicaciones graves. Con el objetivo de mejorar la atención de los pacientes con estas patologías en el entorno de la Comunidad de Madrid, se diseñó un estudio para identificar las causas y las posibles soluciones para hacer frente los problemas relacionados con el diagnóstico de estas patologías. Tras un análisis preliminar, se identificaron 11 áreas de mejora relacionadas con cuatro aspectos diferenciados del proceso asistencial: coordinación y protocolos, equipamientos, formación y concienciación sobre las patologías y experiencia del paciente. De todas ellas, se priorizó resolver aquellas relacionadas con la generación de protocolos de abordaje integral de las patologías y que contemplen todas las especialidades y niveles asistenciales implicados. Otro aspecto crucial es el incremento del grado de sospecha clínica de estas patologías. (AU)


Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis can be a medical emergency in which a delay in correct diagnosis and therapeutic management can cause serious complications. With the aim of improving the care of patients with these pathologies in the Community of Madrid, a study was designed to identify the causes and possible solutions to address the problems related to the diagnosis of these pathologies. After the analysis, 11 areas of improvement related to four different aspects of the care process were identified: coordination and protocols, equipment, training and awareness of pathologies, and patient experience. Of all the areas identified, it was considered a priority to resolve those related to the generation of protocols for the comprehensive management of the pathologies, which include all the specialties and levels of care involved. Another crucial aspect is the increase in the degree of clinical suspicion of these pathologies. (AU)


Subject(s)
Polymyalgia Rheumatica/complications , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/complications , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Patient Care
12.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 30(1): e34-e38, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37185203

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) relapses and long-term GC dependency are common. We assessed risk factors for higher relapse rate and/or prolonged glucocorticoid therapy in PMR patients. METHODS: A multicenter and observational study (chart review) of PMR patients seen between 2006 and 2021 who had at least a 3-month follow-up period after starting GCs was performed. Results were expressed as median and interquartile range 25th-75th or mean ± standard deviation for numerical variables and percentage for categorical ones. Relapse versus nonrelapse groups were compared using Cox proportional analysis. Hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. In all cases, a p value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: We included 185 patients (69.1% female). The median follow-up time was 17.1 months (interquartile range, 6.8-34.7). Incidence of relapses was 1.2 per 100 persons/month. In univariate analysis, PMR patients with a previous history of dyslipidemia had a lower risk of relapse (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.94; p = 0.03); high-dose GC (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.42-3.87; p = 0.001) and faster GC dose reduction had higher risk of relapse (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.77-5.21; p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a previous history of dyslipidemia had a lower risk of relapse (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.92; p = 0.023), and high dose of GC (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.49-4.08; p = 0.001) remained the only risk factors for relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Lower doses of corticosteroids and a slow rate of reduction are critical to avoid relapse in PMR. Risk factors for higher relapse rate rely on therapy more than clinical characteristics of the patients at the time of diagnosis of PMR.


Subject(s)
Dyslipidemias , Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Female , Male , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Recurrence , Dyslipidemias/chemically induced , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy
13.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 63(1): 158-164, 2024 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37129541

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to analyse the prevalence and characteristics of subclinical GCA in patients with PMR. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional multicentre international study of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed PMR without symptoms or signs suggestive of GCA. All patients underwent US of the temporal superficial, common carotid, subclavian and axillary arteries. Patients with halo signs in at least one examined artery were considered to have subclinical GCA. The clinical, demographic and laboratory characteristics of the PMR group without subclinical vasculitis were compared with subclinical GCA, and the pattern of vessel involvement was compared with that of a classical single-centre GCA cohort. RESULTS: We included 346 PMR patients, 267 (77.2%) without subclinical GCA and 79 (22.8%) with subclinical GCA. The PMR patients with subclinical GCA were significantly older, had a longer duration of morning stiffness and more frequently reported hip pain than PMR without subclinical GCA. PMR with subclinical GCA showed a predominant extracranial large vessel pattern of vasculitic involvement compared with classical GCA, where the cranial phenotype predominated. The patients with PMR in the classical GCA group showed a pattern of vessel involvement similar to classical GCA without PMR but different from PMR with subclinical involvement. CONCLUSION: More than a fifth of the pure PMR patients had US findings consistent with subclinical GCA. This specific subset of patients showed a predilection for extracranial artery involvement. The optimal screening strategy to assess the presence of vasculitis in PMR remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Giant Cell Arteritis/epidemiology , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/epidemiology , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pain
15.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 76(2): 259-264, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37563714

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study describes the demographics, comorbidities, and treatment patterns in a national cohort of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) who received care from rheumatology providers. METHODS: Patients with PMR were identified in the American College of Rheumatology Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry from 2016 to 2022. Use of glucocorticoids and immunomodulatory antirheumatic medications used as steroid-sparing agents were examined overall and in a subgroup of patients new to rheumatology practices, the majority with presumed new-onset PMR. In these new patients, multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with persistent glucocorticoid and steroid-sparing agent use at 12 to 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 26,102 patients with PMR were identified, of which 16,703 new patients were included in the main analysis. Patients were predominantly female (55.8%) and White (46.7%), with a mean age of 72.0 years. Hypertension (81.2%), congestive heart failure (52.4%), hyperlipidemia (41.3%), and ischemic heart disease (36.0%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. At baseline, 92.3% of patients were on glucocorticoids, and only 13.1% were on a steroid-sparing agent. At 12 to 24 months, most patients remained on glucocorticoids (63.8%). Although there was an increase in use through follow-up, antirheumatic medications were prescribed only to a minority (39.0%) of patients with PMR. CONCLUSION: In this large US-based study of patients with PMR receiving rheumatology care, only a minority of patients were prescribed steroid-sparing agents during the first 24 months of follow-up; most patients remained on glucocorticoids past one year. Further identification of patients who would benefit from steroid-sparing agents and the timing of steroid-sparing agent initiation is needed.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Rheumatology , Humans , Female , United States/epidemiology , Aged , Male , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/epidemiology , Giant Cell Arteritis/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Steroids
16.
Clin Rheumatol ; 43(3): 851-861, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37470883

ABSTRACT

Polymyalgia rheumatica is one of the most common inflammatory rheumatic conditions in older adults. The disease is characterized by pain and stiffness in the shoulder and pelvic girdle. Polymyalgia rheumatica is almost always observed in adults over the age of 50. The current article aimed to provide explanations for the age preference of polymyalgia rheumatica by reviewing the literature regarding disease etiology and pathogenesis. Potential factors related to the association between polymyalgia rheumatica and aging include immunosenescence/inflammaging, increased risk of infections by aging, endocrinosenescence, and age-related changes in gut microbiota. These factors and their potential contributions to immune-mediated inflammation will be discussed.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Aged , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Inflammation/complications , Pain/complications
18.
Autoimmun Rev ; 23(1): 103415, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37625672

ABSTRACT

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are common conditions in older adults. Their clinical connection has been recognized over time, with many patients experiencing both conditions separately, simultaneously or in temporal sequence to each other. Early GCA detection is essential to prevent vascular damage, but identifying subclinical GCA in PMR patients remains a challenge and routine screening is not standard practice. Subclinical GCA prevalence in newly diagnosed PMR patients ranges from 23 to 29%, depending on the screening method. Vessel wall imaging and temporal artery biopsy can detect subclinical GCA. Epidemiology and trigger factors show similarities between the two conditions, but PMR is more common than GCA. Genetic and pathogenesis studies reveal shared inflammatory mechanisms involving dendritic cells, pro-inflammatory macrophages, and an IL-6 signature. However, the inflammatory infiltrates differ, with extensive T cell infiltrates seen in GCA while PMR shows an incomplete profile of T cell and macrophage-derived cytokines. Glucocorticoid treatment is effective for both conditions, but the steroid requirements vary. PMR overall mortality might be similar to the general population, while GCA patients with aortic inflammatory aneurysms face increased mortality risk. The GCA-PMR association warrants further research. Considering their kinship, recently the term GCA-PMR Spectrum Disease (GPSD) has been proposed.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Aged , Giant Cell Arteritis/complications , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/epidemiology , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/complications , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use
19.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 64: 152298, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38000317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of self-reported giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) diagnoses in a large French population-based prospective cohort, and to devise algorithms to improve their accuracy. METHODS: The E3N-EPIC cohort study (Etude Epidémiologique auprès des femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale) includes 98,995 French women born between 1925 and 1950, recruited in 1990 to study risk factors of cancer and chronic diseases. They completed biennially mailed questionnaires to update their health-related information and lifestyle characteristics. In three questionnaires, women could self-report a diagnosis of GCA/PMR. Those women were additionally sent a specific questionnaire, designed to ascertain self-reported diagnoses of GCA/PMR. Four algorithms were then devised to improve their identification. Accuracies of self-reported diagnoses and of each algorithm were calculated by comparing the diagnoses with a blinded medical chart review. RESULTS: Among 98,995 participants, 1,392 women self-reported GCA/PMR. 830 women sent back the specific questionnaire, and 202 women provided medical charts. After independent review of the 202 medical charts, 87.6 % of the self-reported diagnoses of GCA/PMR were accurate. Using additional data from a specific questionnaire (diagnosis confirmation by a physician, and self-report of >3-month of glucocorticoids), and from a reimbursement database (at least two deliveries of glucocorticoids in less than 3 consecutive months) improved their accuracy (91.8 % to 92.8 %). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of self-reported diagnosis of GCA/PMR was high in the E3N-cohort but using additional data as a specific GCA/PMR questionnaire and/or corticosteroid reimbursement database further improved this accuracy. With nearly 600 detected cases of GCA/PMR, we will be able to investigate risk factors for GCA/PMR in women.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Female , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/epidemiology , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/complications , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/epidemiology , Giant Cell Arteritis/etiology , Self Report , Cohort Studies , Prospective Studies
20.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 224(1): 48-56, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142973

ABSTRACT

Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis can be a medical emergency in which a delay in correct diagnosis and therapeutic management can cause serious complications. With the aim of improving the care of patients with these pathologies in the Community of Madrid, a study was designed to identify the causes and possible solutions to address the problems related to the diagnosis of these pathologies. After the analysis, 11 areas of improvement related to four different aspects of the care process were identified: coordination and protocols, equipment, training and awareness of pathologies, and patient experience. Of all the areas identified, it was considered a priority to resolve those related to the generation of protocols for the comprehensive management of the pathologies, which include all the specialties and levels of care involved. Another crucial aspect is the increase in the degree of clinical suspicion of these pathologies.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/therapy , Giant Cell Arteritis/complications , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/therapy , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...