Association between clinical phenotypes of dermatomyositis and polymyositis with myositis-specific antibodies and overlap systemic autoimmune diseases.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between clinical phenotypes of dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) with myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs), and overlap diagnosis of systemic autoimmune diseases.This cross-sectional study was conducted on 67 patients with DM and 27 patients with PM recruited from a regional hospital in southern Taiwan. Clinical phenotypes of DM and PM were assessed and MSAs were measured using a commercial line blot assay. The association of clinical phenotypes of DM and PM with MSAs and overlap diagnosis of systemic autoimmune diseases was performed using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses.Clinically, patients with DM and PM and overlap diagnosis of systemic sclerosis were associated with a higher risk of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) (odds ratio [OR] = 6.73; P = .048), Raynaud phenomenon (OR = 7.30; P = .034), and malignancy (OR = 350.77; P = .013). The risk of malignancy was also associated with older age (OR 1.31; P = .012), and male patients were associated with a higher risk of fever. For MSAs, anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibodies were associated with ILD, antinuclear antibody were associated with a lower risk of arthritis, anti-transcription intermediary factor 1-gamma antibodies were associated with milder symptoms of muscle weakness, anti-Ku antibodies were associated with overlap diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and anti-Ro52 antibodies were associated with the development of Raynaud phenomenon and Sjögren syndrome.MSAs and overlap diagnosis of systemic sclerosis were significantly associated with clinical phenotypes of DM and PM. Physicians should be vigilant for malignancy in older DM and PM patients with overlap diagnosis of systeic sclerosis. The possibility of developing ILD in patients with overlap diagnosis of systemic sclerosis or serum positivity of anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibodies should be considered.

[Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies]. / Idiopathische inflammatorische Myopathien.

Myositis is a rare and an extremely heterogeneous autoimmune disease, that causes muscle weakness. Currently, "idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM)" is the preferred umbrella-term used to describe the disease complexity within individuals. IIM include dermatomyositis, polymyositis, inclusion body myositis, autoimmune necrotizing myopathy, overlap myositis and antisynthetase syndrome. Research activity concerning myositis was very intense over the past ten years and led to new diagnostic approach as well as to novel therapeutic strategies. Correct classification is the key for successful management. One single treatment regime for every possible organ involvement in all different forms of IIM is still not existing.

Overlap myositis, a distinct entity beyond primary inflammatory myositis: A retrospective analysis of a large cohort from the REMICAM registry.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory idiopathic myositis (IIM) comprises a heterogeneous group of systemic muscular diseases that can occur together with other connective tissue diseases (CTD), named overlap myositis (OM). The question of whether OM is a distinct entity still remains controversial. AIM: The present study was conducted to assess the clinical and prognostic differences between patients diagnosed with OM, primary polymyositis (PM) and primary dermatomyositis (DM). METHOD: The study consists of a retrospective longitudinal and multicenter series of IIM patients. Patients were classified as OM, PM and DM. Overlap myositis was defined as patients fulfilling criteria for IIM plus criteria for other CTD (namely systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease, rheumatoid arthritis and primary Sjögren's syndrome). RESULT: A total of 342 patients were included (98 OM, 137 PM and 107 DM). Overlap myositis patients, in comparison with PM and DM, showed significant differences, with more extramuscular involvement, particularly more arthritis (66%, 34.6% and 48.1%, respectively), puffy fingers (49.5%, 11.1% and 24.3%), sclerodactyly (45.4%, 2.2% and 2%), dysphagia (41.8%, 18.2% and 26.4%), Raynaud phenomenon (65.3%, 16.9% and 19.8%), leucopenia (28.9%, 2.2% and 8.4%), thrombocytopenia (8.2%, 2.2% and 1.9%), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (48%, 35% and 30.8%), renal manifestations (13.4%, 3.7% and 1.9%), and more severe infections (41.3%, 26.7% and 21%). No significant differences were found in survival between groups in log rank test (P = 0.106). Multivariate adjusted survival analyses revealed a worse prognosis for severe infections, ILD and baseline elevation of acute phase reactants. CONCLUSION: Overlap myositis stands out as a distinct entity as compared to PM and DM, featuring more extramuscular involvement and more severe infections. Close monitoring is recommended in this subset for early detection and treatment of possible complications.

Current Classification and Management of Inflammatory Myopathies.

Inflammatory disorders of the skeletal muscle include polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), (immune mediated) necrotizing myopathy (NM), overlap syndrome with myositis (overlap myositis, OM) including anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Whereas DM occurs in children and adults, all other forms of myositis mostly develop in middle aged individuals. Apart from a slowly progressive, chronic disease course in IBM, patients with myositis typically present with a subacute onset of weakness of arms and legs, often associated with pain and clearly elevated creatine kinase in the serum. PM, DM and most patients with NM and OM usually respond to immunosuppressive therapy, whereas IBM is largely refractory to treatment. The diagnosis of myositis requires careful and combinatorial assessment of (1) clinical symptoms including pattern of weakness and paraclinical tests such as MRI of the muscle and electromyography (EMG), (2) broad analysis of auto-antibodies associated with myositis, and (3) detailed histopathological work-up of a skeletal muscle biopsy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current classification, diagnostic pathway, treatment regimen and pathomechanistic understanding of myositis.

The diagnosis and classification of polymyositis.

Polymyositis is classified as a separate entity among idiopathic inflammatory myopathies but it is considered as the least common since it is an exclusion diagnosis. This myopathy usually presents with subacute-chronic symmetric proximal limb weakness, although some extramuscular manifestations are common. Creatine kinase values may be increased up to 50-fold in active disease. Muscle biopsy is characterized by endomysial inflammatory infiltrate consisting predominantly of CD8+ T cells that invade healthy muscle fibres expressing the MHC-I antigen. Although serum autoantibodies, EMG and imaging techniques can help in diagnosis, muscle histopathology is a pivotal value. The clinical picture together with the pathological findings confers the also called PM pattern. A broad differential diagnosis is needed before concluding a diagnosis of pure PM. Sporadic inclusion-body myositis, toxic, endocrine and metabolic myopathies as well as muscular dystrophies are the major categories to be ruled out. Finally, a diagnostic algorithm for suspected cases of PM is also proposed.

The diagnosis and classification of mixed connective tissue disease.

The term "mixed connective tissue disease" (MCTD) concerns a systemic autoimmune disease typified by overlapping features between two or more systemic autoimmune diseases and the presence of antibodies against the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein autoantigen (U1snRNP). Since the first description of this condition in 1972, the understanding of clinical manifestations and long-term outcome of MCTD have significantly advanced. Polyarthritis, Raynaud's phenomenon, puffy fingers, lung involvement and esophageal dysmotility are the most frequently reported symptoms among the different cohorts during the course of the disease. Moreover, in recent years a growing interest has been focused on severe organ involvement such as pulmonary arterial hypertension and interstitial lung disease which can accrue during the long-term follow-up and can still significantly influence disease prognosis. Over the last years, significant advances have been made also in disease pathogenesis understanding and a central pathogenetic role of anti-U1RNP autoantibodies has clearly emerged. Although controversies on disease definition and classification still persist, MCTD identifies a group of patients in whom increased surveillance for specific manifestations and prognostic stratification became mandatory to improve patient's outcomes.

Smoldering multiple myeloma requiring treatment: time for a new definition?

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) bridges the gap between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (a mostly premalignant disorder) and active multiple myeloma (MM). Until recently, no interventional study in patients with SMM showed improved overall survival (OS) with therapy as compared with observation. A report from the PETHEMA-GEM (Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematologica) group described both fewer myeloma-related events and better OS among patients with high-risk SMM who were treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This unique study prompted us to review current knowledge about SMM and address the following questions: (1) Are there patients currently defined as SMM who should be treated routinely? (2) Should the definitions of SMM and MM be reconsidered? (3) Has the time come when not treating is more dangerous than treating? (4) Could unintended medical harm result from overzealous intervention? Our conclusion is that those patients with the highest-risk SMM (extreme bone marrow plasmacytosis, extremely abnormal serum immunoglobulin free light chain ratio, and multiple bone lesions detected only by modern imaging) should be reclassified as active MM so that they can receive MM-appropriate therapy and the paradigm of careful observation for patients with SMM can be preserved.

Classifying idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: comparing the performance of six existing criteria.

OBJECTIVES: Various criteria have been proposed to classify the inflammatory myositides (IIMs) polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM). However, none have received universal acceptance. Our aim was to assess the performance of the main criteria used to classify IIM. Specialist consultant diagnosis was considered the gold standard. METHODS: Patients attending King's College Hospital (KCH) or Reggio Emilia Hospital (REH) since 1990 with a diagnosis of IIM or non-inflammatory myopathy were identified, and their records and laboratory investigations retrospectively reviewed. Where the complete data required for the classification criteria or a final physician diagnosis was unavailable, patients were excluded. 52 patients with a specialist diagnosis of PM, DM, inclusion body myositis (IBM) or non-inflammatory myopathy were included. Agreement between specialist consultant diagnosis and classification criteria was measured using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics. Sensitivity and specificity were also calculated. RESULTS: The Dalakas (2003) criteria demonstrated substantial agreement with specialist diagnosis: κ=0.69, sensitivity 77%, specificity 99%. The European Neuromuscular Centre criteria (ENMC) demonstrated fair agreement: κ=0.49, sensitivity 71%, specificity 82%. Other criteria performed less well. In particular, the Bohan and Peter criteria demonstrated a specificity of only 29%. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria of Dalakas (2003) agreed best with specialist consultant diagnosis. The criteria of Bohan and Peter demonstrated very poor specificity. Prospective studies are required to develop improved classification criteria.

Classification, diagnosis, and management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

The detection and characterization of a large array of autoantibodies, including at least 8 different antisynthetase, anti-SRP, -200/100 (HMGCR), -Mi-2, -CADM-140 (MDA5), -SAE, -p155, -MJ (NXP-2), and -PMS1, frequently associated with distinct and well-defined clinicopathological features, allowed for significant improvement in the definition and diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Classification remains difficult, with lingering divergence between the different specialties involved in IIM care, but several categories clearly stand out, including dermatomyositis (DM), overlap myositis (OM), polymyositis, necrotizing myositis, and sporadic inclusion body myositis (s-IBM). Biopsy and histological analysis remain crucial, particularly in the absence of autoantibodies, to accurately specify the diagnosis and rule out mimics such as muscular dystrophies and metabolic myopathies. Numerous infectious agents (in particular human immunodeficiency virus and human T cell lymphotrophic virus-1) and drugs (statins, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, and proton pump inhibitors) can cause mimic IIM that must also be excluded. Pharmacological treatment, in addition to glucocorticoids and immunoglobulins, now includes mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab, which proved helpful in resistant cases, particularly rituximab in DM and OM. Exercise, initially seen as potentially deleterious, recently was shown to be efficacious and safe. IIM can thus be reasonably well controlled in most cases, although aggressive disease remains refractory to treatment, including some cases of necrotizing myopathy. Sporadic IBM still seems resistant to all medications tested to date.

Polymyositis with cytochrome C oxidase negative fibers--a pathological and clinical challenge.

Polymyositis (PM) with cytochrome C oxidase negative fibers also referred to as PM with mitochondrial pathology (PM-Mito) is characterized by the symptoms of inclusion body myositis (IBM) and by the myopathological findings of PM except for an increase of muscle fibers with insufficient mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase activity. Few PM-Mito cases are published; mitochondrial ultrastructure has not been studied in these patients. We report 2 PM-Mito patients with later onset than usually seen in IBM and poor responsiveness to glucocorticoids. Electron microscopy of muscle fibers showed irregular mitochondrial ultrastructure. Sjögren syndrome related antinuclear antibodies (Anti-Ro and Anti-La) were found in one of the two patients but the typical clinical symptoms of Sjögren syndrome such as xerostomia and keratoconjunctivitis were absent in this patient. Taken together, our observations, viewed in conjunction with the current literature, suggest that PM-Mito is an underdiagnosed disease with a multifactorial pathogenesis that should be elucidated in further studies. We want to encourage clinicians and pathologists to consider the possibility of PM-Mito in patients with atypical PM or sIBM.

Polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and autoimmune necrotizing myopathy: clinical features.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders predominantly affecting skeletal muscles, resulting in muscle inflammation and weakness. The 3 most common inflammatory myopathies are polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), and inclusion body myositis. This review details the clinical findings noted in PM, DM, and the emerging entity of autoimmune necrotizing myopathy.

Myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies in overlap myositis in comparison to primary dermatopolymyositis: Relevance for clinical classification: retrospective study of 169 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The current study was performed in order to determine the prevalence of different myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies, as well as their association with clinical characteristics, disease course and response to therapy in 169 Hungarian patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. METHODS: Sera of 130 primary and 39 overlap myositis including systemic sclerosis (13), rheumatoid arthritis (12), systemic lupus erythematosus (5) and Sjögren's syndrome (9) cases were analyzed. Antinuclear antibody, scleroderma-associated antibodies (anti-centromere, anti-topoisomerase I), anti-Jo-1, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-Mi-2, anti-SRP and anti-PM-Scl, anti-Ku, anti-SS-A, anti-SS-B, anti-U1snRNP were tested. Autoantibody results were compared with clinical characteristics, disease course of overlap versus primary myositis patients, as well as with response to therapy. RESULTS: Associated connective tissue disease occurred in 23.1% of the patients. Myositis-associated antibodies were found in 8.5% of primary myositis patients, indicating that 11 additional primary myositis patients (23% vs. 29.6%) can be classified as overlap in all cohort according to the newly proposed diagnostic criteria. Polymyositis was found to be the most common myositis form in overlap myositis (87.2%), while scleroderma was the most common disease associated (33.3%). ANA was positive in 25.4% of primary and in 61.5% of overlap myositis cases. Altogether 39.6% of myositis patients (n=67) had autoantibodies, most commonly anti Jo-1 (18.3%) correlating with a polycyclic disease course. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of myositis-specific and associated antibodies into the newly proposed diagnostic criteria for inflammatory myopathies is of great importance in order to determine subclasses and to introduce adequate therapy in time.

Malignancy is associated with dermatomyositis but not polymyositis in Northern New England, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the association of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and malignancy in patients seen at 1 academic center over a 23-year period. METHODS: Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) codes and diagnoses, then confirmed by chart review. Population cancer statistics obtained from the US Centers for Disease Control for Vermont and New Hampshire were used for comparison. RESULTS: Chart review confirmed IIM in 198 of 483 patients initially identified by ICD-9 codes. Within 5 years of diagnosis with IIM, malignancy developed in 32 patients (16.2%), 24 of whom (75%) had dermatomyositis (DM). Malignancy and DM developed within 1 year in 75%. The cancer risk associated with DM was much greater than the risk associated with other IIM. The most frequent tumor types were breast, lung, pancreas, and colon. DM patients with cancer were more frequently male and >or= 45 years of age than those without cancer. There were no cases of interstitial lung disease among patients with cancer and any form of IIM. The incidence of cancer was increased in patients with DM compared to age- and sex-matched population controls, both over a 5-year interval surrounding the diagnosis of DM and over the lifetime interval following diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The risk of cancer in IIM is concentrated among patients with DM. The association between DM and cancer was enhanced by its temporal relationship (< 1 year) in 87.5% of these cases. Patients with malignancy-associated DM were more frequently male and over age 45 and less likely to have interstitial lung disease.

[Myositides]. / Myositiden.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are diseases that are potentially amenable to immunomodulatory therapy. The challenge for the neuropathologist consists in distinguishing these myopathies from secondary inflammatory myopathies, especially in the context of some muscular dystrophies and metabolic diseases that may also show inflammatory infiltrates. There are generalized IIMs (dermatomyositis, polymyositis, sporadic inclusion body myositis) and focal ones (e.g., proliferative myositis, macrophagic myofasciitis). This review provides diagnostic criteria for each of these and includes pathogenetic mechanisms where available.

Novel classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies based on overlap syndrome features and autoantibodies: analysis of 100 French Canadian patients.

Our objective was to improve the currently imperfect classifications of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). In clinical practice, overlap features are common in IIM. This provided a rationale for positioning overlap clinical features at the core of a new classification system. We conducted a longitudinal study of 100 consecutive adult French Canadian patients with IIM. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained by retrospective chart review. Sera were analyzed for autoantibodies (aAbs) by protein A-assisted immunoprecipitation and double immunodiffusion. Overlap aAbs encompassed aAbs to synthetases, systemic sclerosis-associated aAbs, anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti-nucleoporins. Patients were classified both at IIM diagnosis, based on data at presentation, and at the end of follow-up, based on cumulative findings. Three classifications were used: 1) the Bohan and Peter original classification, 2) a new version of that classification as modified by us, and 3) a novel clinicoserologic classification. As investigators were blinded to aAb results, the modified classification is strictly a clinical classification. Its core concept is the attribution of diagnostic significance to the presence of overlap features, that is, their presence resulted in a diagnosis of overlap myositis (OM). This approach allowed direct comparison with the original Bohan and Peter classification. By integrating aAb results to the modified classification, we also defined the clinicoserologic classification, which allowed to examine the added value of aAbs to diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic stratification. Whereas polymyositis (PM) was the most common IIM according to the original classification, accounting for 45% of the cohort at diagnosis, its frequency fell to 14% with the modified classification. Conversely, while the frequency of myositis associated with connective tissue disease was 24% according to the original classification, the frequency of OM was 60% when using the modified classification. At last follow-up, the frequency of PM fell further to only 9%, while the frequency of OM rose to 67%. Systemic sclerosis was the most common connective tissue disease associated with IIM, accounting for 42.6% of OM patients and 29% of the cohort. The frequencies of overlap aAbs in the cohort and in OM patients were 48% and 70.5% (n =48/68), respectively. The presence of overlap aAbs at IIM diagnosis identified additional OM patients unrecognized by the modified classification. The sensitivity of the modified classification for OM at diagnosis was 87%, suggesting that clinicians may rely on the modified classification for identification of most OM patients, while awaiting results of aAb assays. The new classifications predicted the response to prednisone and IIM course. Using stringent definitions, IIM was classified as responsive or refractory after an adequate initial corticosteroid therapy, and the disease course as monophasic or chronic after a single adequate trial of prednisone. PM was always chronic and was associated with the highest rate (50%) of refractoriness to initial corticosteroid treatment. Dermatomyositis was almost always chronic (92% rate); however, its responsiveness to initial corticosteroid treatment was high (87%). OM was almost always responsive to corticosteroids (89%-100% rates). When OM patients were divided according to aAb subsets, anti-synthetase, SRP, or nucleoporin aAbs were markers for chronic myositis, whereas aAbs to U1RNP, Pm-Scl, or Ku were markers for monophasic myositis. We conclude that the original Bohan and Peter classification should be abandoned as it leads to misclassification of patients. Much of IIM is composed of OM. The proposed modified and clinicoserologic classifications have diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value.

Carcinoma de ovario y dermatomiositis / Ovarian carcinoma and dermatomyositis

Referimos el caso de una mujer en la que se diagnosticó de forma simultánea la presencia de dermatomiositis y un carcinoma de ovario en estadio avanzado. Comentamos la relación de la dermatomiositis y el cáncer, en especial su asociación con el cáncer ginecológico (AU)