Gene fusions in poroma, porocarcinoma and related adnexal skin tumours: An update.

Poroma is a benign sweat gland tumour showing morphological features recapitulating the superficial portion of the eccrine sweat coil. A subset of poromas may transform into porocarcinoma, its malignant counterpart. Poroma and porocarcinoma are characterised by recurrent gene fusions involving YAP1, a transcriptional co-activator, which is controlled by the Hippo signalling pathway. The fusion genes frequently involve MAML2 and NUTM1, which are also rearranged in other cutaneous and extracutaneous neoplasms. We aimed to review the clinical, morphological and molecular features of this category of adnexal neoplasms with a special focus upon emerging differential diagnoses, and discuss how their systematic molecular characterisation may contribute to a standardisation of diagnosis, more accurate classification and, ultimately, refinement of their prognosis and therapeutic modalities.

Distinct regulations driving YAP1 expression loss in poroma, porocarcinoma and RB1-deficient skin carcinoma.

AIMS: Recently, YAP1 fusion genes have been demonstrated in eccrine poroma and porocarcinoma, and the diagnostic use of YAP1 immunohistochemistry has been highlighted in this setting. In other organs, loss of YAP1 expression can reflect YAP1 rearrangement or transcriptional repression, notably through RB1 inactivation. In this context, our objective was to re-evaluate the performance of YAP1 immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of poroma and porocarcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: The expression of the C-terminal part of the YAP1 protein was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 543 cutaneous epithelial tumours, including 27 poromas, 14 porocarcinomas and 502 other cutaneous tumours. Tumours that showed a lack of expression of YAP1 were further investigated for Rb by immunohistochemistry and for fusion transcripts by real-time PCR (YAP1::MAML2 and YAP1::NUTM1). The absence of YAP1 expression was observed in 24 cases of poroma (89%), 10 porocarcinoma (72%), 162 Merkel cell carcinoma (98%), 14 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (15%), one trichoblastoma and one sebaceoma. Fusions of YAP1 were detected in only 16 cases of poroma (n = 66%), 10 porocarcinoma (71%) all lacking YAP1 expression, and in one sebaceoma. The loss of Rb expression was detected in all cases except one of YAP1-deficient SCC (n = 14), such tumours showing significant morphological overlap with porocarcinoma. In-vitro experiments in HaCat cells showed that RB1 knockdown resulted in repression of YAP1 protein expression. CONCLUSION: In addition to gene fusion, we report that transcriptional repression of YAP1 can be observed in skin tumours with RB1 inactivation, including MCC and a subset of SCC.

NUT Is a Specific Immunohistochemical Marker for the Diagnosis of YAP1-NUTM1-rearranged Cutaneous Poroid Neoplasms.

YAP1-NUTM1 fusion transcripts have been recently reported in poroma and porocarcinoma. NUTM1 translocation can be screened by nuclear protein in testis (NUT) immunohistochemistry in various malignancies, but its diagnostic performance has not been thoroughly validated on a large cohort of cutaneous epithelial neoplasms. We have evaluated NUT immunohistochemical expression in a large cohort encompassing 835 cases of various cutaneous epidermal or adnexal epithelial neoplasms. NUT expression was specific to eccrine poromas and porocarcinoma, with 32% of cases showing NUT expression. All other cutaneous tumors tested lacked NUT expression, including mimickers such as seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, nodular hidradenoma, and all other adnexal tumors tested. Remarkably, NUT expression was more frequent in a distinct morphologic subgroup. Indeed, 93% of poroid hidradenoma (dermal/subcutaneous nodular poroma, 13/14) and 80% of poroid hidradenocarcinoma cases (malignant poroid hidradenoma, 4/5) showed NUT expression, in contrast to 17% and 11% of classic poroma (4/23) and porocarcinoma cases (4/35), respectively. RNA sequencing of 12 NUT-positive neoplasms further confirmed the presence of a YAP1-NUTM1 fusion transcript in all cases, and also an EMC7-NUTM1 gene fusion in a single case. In the setting of a cutaneous adnexal neoplasm, nuclear expression of NUT accurately and specifically diagnosed a specific subgroup of benign and malignant poroid tumors, all associated with a NUTM1 fusion, which frequently harbored a poroid hidradenoma morphology.

Recurrent YAP1-MAML2 and YAP1-NUTM1 fusions in poroma and porocarcinoma.

Poroma is a benign skin tumor exhibiting terminal sweat gland duct differentiation. The present study aimed to explore the potential role of gene fusions in the tumorigenesis of poromas. RNA sequencing and reverse transcription PCR identified highly recurrent YAP1-MAML2 and YAP1-NUTM1 fusions in poromas (92/104 lesions, 88.5%) and their rare malignant counterpart, porocarcinomas (7/11 lesions, 63.6%). A WWTR1-NUTM1 fusion was identified in a single lesion of poroma. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization confirmed genomic rearrangements involving these genetic loci. Immunohistochemical staining could readily identify the YAP1 fusion products as nuclear expression of the N-terminal portion of YAP1 with a lack of the C-terminal portion. YAP1 and WWTR1, also known as YAP and TAZ, respectively, encode paralogous transcriptional activators of TEAD, which are negatively regulated by the Hippo signaling pathway. The YAP1 and WWTR1 fusions strongly transactivated a TEAD reporter and promoted anchorage-independent growth, confirming their tumorigenic roles. Our results demonstrate the frequent presence of transforming YAP1 fusions in poromas and porocarcinomas and suggest YAP1/TEAD-dependent transcription as a candidate therapeutic target against porocarcinoma.

Altered Rb, p16, and p53 expression is specific for porocarcinoma relative to poroma.

BACKGROUND: Porocarcinomas are rare aggressive carcinomas that harbor tumor suppressor mutations and must be distinguished from benign entities such as poromas. METHODS: To determine whether altered expression of these genes was diagnostically informative, we examined p53, Rb, and p16 staining patterns in 15 poromas and 16 porocarcinomas. RESULTS: Poromas consistently displayed diffuse strong expression of Rb in all but one case that displayed focal loss (1/15, 7%), and no evidence of aberrancy in p53 or p16. Porocarcinomas displayed diffuse or focal loss of Rb expression in 9/16 (56%) cases, diffuse loss or overexpression of p53 in 8/15 (53%), and diffuse loss or overexpression of p16 in 6/14 (43%). Diffuse aberrancy in p53 and Rb expression correlated with tumor mutations in TP53 and RB1, respectively, whereas focal Rb loss was associated with wild type RB1. Diffuse p16 overexpression correlated with Rb loss rather than CDKN2A mutation. For porocarcinomas with all three stains evaluable, 10/13 (77%) displayed aberrancy in at least one marker. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that altered p53, p16, and/or Rb expression is relatively specific to porocarcinoma in comparison with poroma. Technical limitations of this panel, including possible focal Rb loss, must be kept in mind, especially in limited samples.

Intraepidermal benign sebaceous neoplasm: apocrine poroma (hidroacanthoma simplex type) with extensive sebaceous differentiation with sebaceoma-like features.

We herein report a patient who clinically presented with a yellowish, flat plaque that histopathologically showed a benign lesion mainly composed of intraepidermal basaloid nests with sebaceous differentiation. This lesion was considered to be fundamentally apocrine poroma (hidroacanthoma simplex type) with sebaceous differentiation. Nests composed of typical poroid cells were seen, and the results of immunostaining for lumican supported this diagnosis and excluded the possibility of clonal seborrheic keratosis. The sebaceous differentiation in apocrine poromas mostly occurs in Pinkus type lesions, and is usually seen in only part of the lesions, as solitary, mature sebocytes within the poroma nests. However, our apocrine poroma case was unique not only in that sebaceous differentiation occurred in the hidroacanthoma simplex type, but also in that it was observed extensively (approximately 60% of the nests). We therefore called this lesion an 'intraepidermal benign sebaceous neoplasm'. Although it may be hard to differentiate sebaceous germinative cells (seen in sebaceoma) from poroid cells, in this case, some poroma nests could be judged to neighbor or contain the sebaceoma-like areas. Therefore, the presented apocrine poroma was considered to have some features of (intraepidermal and dermal) sebaceoma.

Multiple apocrine poromas: a new case report.

Apocrine poromas are rare and distinctive benign adnexal neoplasms featuring tumor cells differentiating toward folliculosebaceous-apocrine units. We report an extremely rare case with multiple apocrine poromas in a single patient. Fifteen tumors were distributed on the head, neck, forearm and axilla of a 74-year-old man. All tumors were mostly composed of poroid cells that surrounded variably sized duct spaces, some of which exhibited decapitation secretion. The poroid cells were continuous with infundibulum-like structures that contained aggregates of mature sebocytes. The patient had no family history of similar tumors and no history of immunosuppressive therapy. This is the first report of multiple apocrine poromas, suggesting that predisposing genetic factors might play a part in the development of the tumors.

Merkel cell carcinoma arising within a poroma: report of two cases.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has been reported in association with other types of cutaneous neoplasms within the same lesion, including squamous cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease, actinic keratosis, follicular cysts, trichoblastoma and lentigo maligna, among others. However, the association of MCC and sweat gland tumors has never been described in the literature. We report two unique cases of MCC that developed within cutaneous poromas. A 56-year-old male (Patient 1) and an 81-year-old female (Patient 2) presented with nodules on the upper arm and lower back, respectively. Histopathologic study of both cases revealed a tumor in the dermis composed of poroid and cuticular cells intermingled with a proliferation of small round cells that showed characteristic histopathological and immunohistochemical features of MCC. In both cases, the two neoplasms were tightly admixed and distinct, suggesting that the MCC could have developed within a previously existing poroma. No morphological features of transition between the two tumors were seen. Neoplastic cells of MCC expressed immunoreactivity for chromogranin, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase, CAM 5.2 and cytokeratin 20, the last two markers showing the characteristic paranuclear dot-like pattern. In contrast, the poroma cells only expressed cytokeratin MNF116. Metastatic deposits were not identified in the regional lymph nodes or distantly.

Poroma: a review of eccrine, apocrine, and malignant forms.

Poroma is a benign adnexal neoplasm of the terminal sweat gland duct. Although poromas have traditionally been thought to originate from the eccrine sweat gland, there have been cases of apocrine etiology as well. Eccrine and apocrine poromas typically present as erythematous or flesh-colored nodules on the palms and soles. As these features overlap with a multitude of differential diagnoses, it is imperative to have a firm understanding of the characteristics that make the diagnosis of poroma. In addition, the malignant counterpart to the poroma, the eccrine porocarcinoma, manifests in a similar nonspecific fashion. Case studies and literature reviews have contributed immensely to our present knowledge of poroma and porocarcinoma. Given the rarity of these neoplasms, however, there remains a relative paucity of information on atypical presentations and rates of malignant transformation. In this article, the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of poroma and porocarcinoma will be reviewed. This systematic approach may serve as a guide in navigating the diagnostic dilemma of these rare cutaneous lesions.

A case of porocarcinoma arising in pigmented hidroacanthoma simplex with multiple lymph node, liver and bone metastases.

Porocarcinoma is a rare skin appendage carcinoma that may arise de novo or be associated with pre-existing poroma and hidroacanthoma simplex (HAS). Here, we report a case of porocarcinoma arising in pigmented HAS, which led to death from multiple lymph node, liver and bone metastases. A 72-year-old Japanese man presented with a brown to focal black flat plaque, measuring 17 × 12 mm, on the posterior region of his right thigh. Histopathological study of the tumor revealed that there was intraepidermal proliferation of small-sized basaloid cells, and it exhibited the 'Jadassohn phenomenon', with dendritic melanocytes, and a few ductal structures were observed. Continuing to the intraepidermal nests, the invasive proliferation of large polygonal cells with occasional intracytoplasmic ductal structures was observed. Carcinoembryonic antigen and epithelial membrane antigen were expressed in some carcinoma cells and they highlighted the intracytoplasmic ductal structures. Multiple lymph node, liver and bone metastases were observed, and the patient died 8 months after the initial surgery. Clinical diagnosis of HAS is extremely rare. Porocarcinoma may be associated with pre-existing HAS and sometimes shows aggressive behavior. Therefore, pigmented HAS must be included in the differential diagnosis of brown or black lesions. Ishida M, Hotta M, Kushima R, Okabe H. A case of porocarcinoma arising in pigmented hidroacanthoma simplex with multiple lymph node, liver and bone metastases.