Impact of hospital and surgeon volumes in the management of complicated portal hypertension: review of a statewide database in Florida.

Mortality after complex surgical procedures has been shown to be inversely related to hospital volume. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these findings are applicable to radiologic and surgical procedures for complicated portal hypertension. The Agency for Healthcare Administration for the State of Florida database was queried to determine outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic stent shunts (TIPS) or surgical shunts from 2000 to 2003. A total of 1486 patients underwent either TIPS (1321) or surgical shunts (165). Natural breakpoints occurred at two and six procedures per year were correlated with survival for surgical shunts but not TIPS. Overall mortality was not different between TIPS and surgical shunts (11.0 vs. 12.7%, P = 0.51); however, the cost of TIPS was significantly lower (62,000 +/- 58.5 vs. 107,000 +/- 97.8, P < 0.001) as well as the length of hospitalization (9 +/- 9.0 days vs. 15 days +/- 12.6 days, P < 0.001). Surgical procedures for complicated portal hypertension are rapidly being replaced by TIPS. Like with other complex procedures, outcomes are related to hospital volume.

Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt vs surgical shunt in good-risk cirrhotic patients: a case-control comparison.

HYPOTHESIS: In good-risk patients with variceal bleeding undergoing portal decompression, surgical shunt is more effective, more durable, and less costly than angiographic shunt (transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt [TIPS]). DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Academic referral center for liver disease. PATIENTS: Patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis with at least 1 prior episode of bleeding from portal hypertension (gastroesophageal varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy). INTERVENTION: Portal decompression by angiographic (TIPS) or surgical (portacaval, distal splenorenal) shunt. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day and long-term mortality, postintervention diagnostic procedures (endoscopic, ultrasonographic, and angiographic studies), hospital readmissions, variceal rebleeding episodes, blood transfusions, shunt revisions, and hospital and professional charges. RESULTS: Patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis undergoing TIPS (n = 20) or surgical shunt (n = 20) were followed up for 385 and 456 patient-months, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was greater following TIPS compared with surgical shunt (20% vs 0%; P =.20); long-term mortality did not differ. Significantly more rebleeding episodes (P<.001); rehospitalizations (P<.05); diagnostic studies of all types (P<.001); shunt revisions (P<.001); and hospital (P<.005), professional (P<.05), and total (P<. 005) charges occurred following TIPS compared with surgical shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Operative portal decompression is more effective, more durable, and less costly than TIPS in Child-Pugh class A and B cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding. Good-risk patients with portal hypertensive bleeding should be referred for surgical shunt.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus H-graft portacaval shunt in the management of bleeding varices: a cost-benefit analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is popular in treating portal hypertension because of its perceived efficacy and cost benefits, although it has never been compared with surgical shunting in a cost-benefit analysis. This study was undertaken to determine the cost benefit of TIPS versus small-diameter prosthetic H-graft portacaval shunt (HGPCS). METHODS: Cost of care was determined in 80 patients prospectively randomized to receive TIPS or HGPCS as definitive treatment for bleeding varices, beginning with shunt placement and including subsequent admissions for complications or follow-up related to shunting. RESULTS: Patients were similar in age, gender, severity of illness/liver dysfunction, and urgency of shunting. After TIPS or HGPCS, variceal rehemorrhage (8 versus O, respectively; p = 0.03), shunt occlusion (13 versus 4; p = 0.03), shunt revision (16 versus 4; p < 0.005), and shunt failure (18 versus 10; p = 0.10) were compared; all were more common after TIPS. Through the index admission, TIPS cost $48,188 +/- $43,355 whereas HGPCS cost $61,552 +/- $47,615. With follow-up, TIPS cost $69,276 +/- $52,712 and HGPCS cost $66,034 +/- $49,118. CONCLUSIONS: Early cost of TIPS was less than, though not different from, cost of HGPCS. With follow-up, costs after TIPS mounted. The initially lower cost of TIPS is offset by higher rates of subsequent occlusion and rehemorrhage.

The cost of dying of end-stage liver disease.

BACKGROUND: The high cost of liver transplantation is well known. The cost of dying of complications of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) without transplant, however, has not been well documented. METHODS: For a 5-year period (1991-1995), in 153 patients, mean inpatient hospital charges and length of stay were analyzed in 6 groups of patients: (1) patients admitted with the primary diagnosis of esophageal varices, (1a) the subset of group 1 patients who died on this admission, (2) patients admitted to the liver team who died of complications from ESLD, (3) patients who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, (4) patients who underwent surgical shunt for bleeding varices, and (5) patients who underwent liver transplantation. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients with esophageal varices were hospitalized 13.7 days with a mean charge of $30,980 for each of 202 admissions. Of these, 38 died after 24 days with a mean charge of $67,091. Seven patients admitted to the liver team died of complications of ESLD at $110,576 per admission. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was performed in 17 patients with a mean charge of $43,209. Six patients underwent surgical shunt for $53,994. Mean charge for 7 liver transplantations was $222,968. During the study period, 36.7% of all charges were for patients who died. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to estimate the total cost of ESLD; however, in evaluating inpatient costs, we see that it is expensive and significant amounts are spent on patients who die. Further study is necessary to determine which factors can optimize the cost of ESLD.

Cost of treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.

We examined the cost of four methods of treatment of bleeding esophageal varices--medical treatment, sclerotherapy, variceal ligation operations, and portal systemic shunts--in 49 consecutive patients from 1977 to 1979, and correlated the two-year outcome with cost. We found that, despite bias imposed by selection, the cost per patient and cost per survivor at two years was lowest in patients who received sclerotherapy, even though they were more seriously ill than patients who received other treatments. Patients treated with sclerotherapy also had the lowest mortality during primary hospitalization and the lowest readmission rate during a two-year period.