Diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography does not predict survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac dysfunction is frequently observed in patients with cirrhosis. There remains a paucity of data from routine clinical practice regarding the role of echocardiography in the pre-assessment of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt. AIM: Our study aimed to investigate if echocardiography parameters predict outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion in cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients who underwent echocardiography and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion at the liver unit (Birmingham, UK) between 1999 and 2016 were included. All echocardiography measures (including left ventricle ejection fraction; early maximal ventricular filling/late filling velocity ratio, diastolic dysfunction as per British Society of Echocardiography guidelines) were independently reviewed by a cardiologist. Predictors of 30-day and overall transplant free-survival were assessed. RESULTS: One Hundred and Seventeen patients with cirrhosis (median age 56 years; 54% alcohol; Child-Pugh B/C 71/14.5%; Model For End-Stage Liver Disease 12) underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt for ascites (n = 78) and variceal haemorrhage (n = 39). Thirty-day and overall transplant-free survival was 90% (n = 105) and 31% (n = 36), respectively, over a median 663 (IQR 385-2368) days follow-up. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (P < 0.001) and Child-Pugh Score (P = 0.002) significantly predicted 30-day and overall transplant-free survival. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease ≥15 implied three-fold risk of death. Six per cent (n = 7) of patients pre-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt had a history of ischaemic heart disease and 34% (n = 40) had 1 or more cardiovascular disease risk factors. Fifty per cent (n = 59) had an abnormal echocardiogram and 33% (n = 39) had grade 1-3 diastolic dysfunction. On univariate analysis none of the echocardiography measures pre-intervention were related to 30-day or overall transplant-free survival post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular, in particular diastolic dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis does not predict survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Child-Pugh scores remain the best predictors of survival. Further prospective study is required to clarify the role of routine echocardiography prior to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion.

Surgical portosystemic shunts versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal haemorrhage in people with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Variceal haemorrhage that is refractory or recurs after pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy requires a portal decompression shunt (either surgical shunts or radiologic shunt, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)). TIPS has become the shunt of choice; however, is it the preferred option? This review assesses evidence for the comparisons of surgical portosystemic shunts versus TIPS for variceal haemorrhage in people with cirrhotic portal hypertension. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of surgical portosystemic shunts versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for treatment of refractory or recurrent variceal haemorrhage in people with cirrhotic portal hypertension. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science. We also searched on-line trial registries, reference lists of relevant articles, and proceedings of relevant associations for trials that met the inclusion criteria for this review (date of search 8 March 2018). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing surgical portosystemic shunts versus TIPS for the treatment of refractory or recurrent variceal haemorrhage in people with cirrhotic portal hypertension. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials and extracted data using methodological standards expected by Cochrane. We assessed risk of bias according to domains and risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We found four randomised clinical trials including 496 adult participants diagnosed with variceal haemorrhage due to cirrhotic portal hypertension. The overall risk of bias in all the trials was judged at high risk. All the trials were conducted in the United States of America (USA). Two of the trials randomised participants to selective surgical shunts versus TIPS. The other two trials randomised participants to non-selective surgical shunts versus TIPS. The diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was by clinical and laboratory findings. We are uncertain whether there is a difference in all-cause mortality at 30 days between surgical portosystemic shunts compared with TIPS (risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 1.99; participants = 496; studies = 4). We are uncertain whether there is a difference in encephalopathy between surgical shunts compared with TIPS (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.16; participants = 496; studies = 4). We found evidence suggesting an increase in the occurrence of the following harms in the TIPS group compared with surgical shunts: all-cause mortality at five years (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.90; participants = 496; studies = 4); variceal rebleeding (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; participants = 496; studies = 4); reinterventions (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.28; participants = 496; studies = 4); and shunt occlusion (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.51; participants = 496; studies = 4). We could not perform an analysis of health-related quality of life but available evidence appear to suggest improved health-related quality of life in people who received surgical shunt compared with TIPS. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for all-cause mortality at 30 days and five years, irreversible shunt occlusion, and encephalopathy to very low because of high risk of bias (due to lack of blinding); inconsistency (due to heterogeneity); imprecision (due to small sample sizes of the individual trials and few events); and publication bias (few trials reporting outcomes). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for variceal rebleeding and reintervention to very low because of high risk of bias (due to lack of blinding); imprecision (due to small sample sizes of the individual trials and few events); and publication bias (few trials reporting outcomes). The small sample sizes and few events did not allow us to produce meaningful trial sequential monitoring boundaries, suggesting plausible random errors in our estimates. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence suggesting that surgical portosystemic shunts may have benefit over TIPS for treatment of refractory or recurrent variceal haemorrhage in people with cirrhotic portal hypertension. Given the very low-certainty of the available evidence and risks of random errors in our analyses, we have very little confidence in our review findings.

Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND Expanded clinical and surgical techniques in liver transplantation can markedly improve patient and graft survival. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative portocaval shunts in liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Searches were conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, and updated in January 2018. The following specific outcomes of interest were defined and evaluated separated using 2 different reviews and meta-analyses for 1) hemi-portocaval shunt (HPCS) and 2) temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS). Comparative studies were analyzed separately for both surgical portocaval shunt modalities. RESULTS Only 1 well-designed randomized controlled trial was found. Most studies were retrospective or prospective. Initially, we found 1479 articles. Of those selected, 853 were from PubMed/MEDLINE, 32 were from Cochrane and 594 were from EMBASE. Our meta-analysis included a total of 3232 patients for all the included studies. Results found that 41 patients with HPCS experienced increased 1-year patient survival (OR 16.33; P=0.02) and increased 1-year graft survival (OR 17.67; P=0.01). The TPCS analysis with 1633 patients found patients had significantly shorter intensive care unit length of stay (days) (P=0.006) and hospital length of stay (P=0.02) and had decreased primary nonfunction (PNF) (OR 0.30, P=0.02) and mortality rates (OR 0.52, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative surgical portosystemic shunt in relation to liver transplantation with TPCS was able to prevent PNF, decrease hospital length of stay and unit care length of stay. Furthermore, in analyzing data for patients with HPCS, we observed increases in the 1-year graft and patient survival rates. More prospective randomized trials are needed to arrive at a more precise conclusion.

[Standardization of intensive therapy tactics for acute hepatic insufficiency in patients with liver cirrhosis after portosystem shunting]. / Standartizatsiia taktiki intensivnoi terapii pri ostroi pechenochnoi nedostatochnosti u patsientov s tsirrozom pecheni posle portosistemnogo shuntirovaniia.

AIM: Here we analyze efficiency of the algorithm for intensive therapy of acute hepatic insufficiency in patients with cirrhosis after portosystemic shunting, based on the experience of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after academician V.V. Vakhidov and considering recommendations of the world's leading hepatology schools. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Algorithm efficiency was analyzed based on the results of portosystemic shunting of 556 patients with cirrhosis and acute liver insufficiency. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by presence and severity of postoperative complications, such as hepatic insufficiency and hepatic encephalopathy. Initial decompensation of liver cirrhosis significantly increases the risk of postoperative complications of portosystemic shunting due to edematous ascites syndrome - liver insufficiency (13.5% vs 6.9% in patients without ascites p≥0.05) and hepatic encephalopathy (64.9% vs. 51,7%, respectively, p≥0.05). In group of patients with preoperative ascites syndrome mortality rate was 3.8% (10 patients) and in the group without ascites - 2.3% (6 patients). The main cause of early postoperative lethality was anastomotic thrombosis development with recurrence of bleeding from esophagus and stomach varicose veins. To reduce the risk of postoperative complications and lethality, a therapeutic-tactical algorithm was developed which was effective in combination with a complex of conservative and biophysical methods of treatment and aimed at eliminating the 'resolving factors' of their developmen. RESULTS: One of the most important components of this algorithm is pharmacotherapy with hepatoprotective drugs use in patients with liver cirrhosis in the postoperative period to maintain liver functional state. Considering the antihypoxic, detoxifying and antioxidant properties of active components of remaxol and revealed positive effect of its use in patients (decrease in bilirubin level, increase in albumin fraction of total blood protein and decrease in activity of ALAT and ASAT in 2 times), this drug can be recommended for inclusion in the postoperative pathogenetic standard therapy in this category of patients.

Outcomes of surgical shunts and transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic stent shunts for complicated portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic stent shunt (TIPSS), instead of surgical shunt, has become the standard treatment for patients with complicated portal hypertension. This study compared outcomes in patients who underwent TIPSS or surgical shunting for complicated portal hypertension. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all consecutive patients who received portasystemic shunts from 1994 to 2014 at a single institution. Patients who underwent surgical shunting were compared with those who had a TIPSS procedure following one-to-one propensity score matching. The primary study endpoints were overall survival and shunt failure, defined as major variceal rebleeding, relapse of refractory ascites, irreversible shunt occlusion, liver failure requiring liver transplantation, or death. RESULTS: A total of 471 patients received either a surgical shunt or TIPSS. Of these, 334 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who underwent elective surgical shunting (34) or TIPSS (300) for repeated variceal bleeding or refractory ascites were evaluated. Propensity score matching yielded 31 pairs of patients. There were no between-group differences in morbidity and 30-day mortality rates. However, shunt failure was less frequent after surgical shunting than TIPSS (6 of 31 versus 16 of 31; P = 0·016). The 5-year shunt failure-free survival (77 versus 15 per cent; P = 0·008) and overall survival (93 versus 42 per cent; P = 0·037) rates were higher for patients with surgical shunts. Multivariable analysis revealed that a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score exceeding14 and TIPSS were independently associated with shunt failure. In patients with MELD scores of 14 or less, the 5-year overall survival rate remained higher after surgical shunting than TIPSS (100 versus 40 per cent; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Surgical shunting achieved better results than TIPSS in patients with complicated portal hypertension and low MELD scores.

Polyvinyl alcohol terminal chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic arteriovenous shunts: Safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) terminal chemoembolization and to identify the prognostic factors associated with survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatic arteriovenous shunts (HAVS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 133 patients' managements were retrospectively analyzed. HAVS was classified into three types: slow-flow, intermediate-flow and high-flow. The size of the PVA used was determined following the scheme: slow-flow HAVS: 300-500µm PVA; intermediate-flow HAVS: 500-710µm PVA; high-flow HAVS: 710-1000µm PVA. The HCCs with slow-flow and intermediate-flow HAVS were embolized by PVA plus chemotherapeutic agents lipiodol emulsion, while the high-flow HAVS were treated by PVA with chemotherapeutic agents. Survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. The influence of possible prognostic factors on survival were analyzed by multivariate Cox proportional-hazards method. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) of 133 patients was 9.1 months. The median OS of the slow-flow type, intermediate-flow type and high-flow type patients were 10.8, 9.1 and 7.3 months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference among different HAVS types (P=0.239). The 30-day mortality was 3.8%. Cox multivariate survival analysis revealed that initial preoperative AFP value≥400ng/ml (HR=2.105, P=0.006) was an independent risk factor. While multiple embolization (HR=0.482, P=0.011), tumor remission (HR=0.431, P=0.041) and multimodality therapy (HR=0.416, P=0.004) were independent protection factors. CONCLUSION: It is safe and effective for HCCs with HAVS treated by terminal chemoembolization therapy with PVA plus chemotherapeutic agents lipiodol emulsion (or PVA plus chemotherapeutic agents). The HCCs with HAVS achieves good prognosis with multiple embolization, tumor remission and multimodality therapy, while achieves poor prognosis with inital preoperative high AFP value (≥400ng/ml).

Surgical portosystemic shunts in the era of TIPS and liver transplantation are still relevant.

BACKGROUND: The surgical portosystemic shunts (PSS) are a time-proven modality for treating portal hypertension. Recently, in the era of liver transplantation and the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), use of the PSS has declined. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate changes in practice, referral patterns, and short- and longterm outcomes of the use of the surgical PSS before and after the introduction of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 47 patients undergoing PSS between 1996 and 2011 in a single university hospital was conducted. RESULTS: Subgroups of patients with cirrhosis (53%), Budd-Chiari syndrome (13%), portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (26%), and other pathologies (9%) differed significantly with respect to shunt type, Child-Pugh class, MELD score and perioperative mortality. Perioperative mortality at 60 days was 15%. Five-year survival was 68% (median: 70 months); 5-year shunt patency was 97%. Survival was best in patients with PVT and worst in those with Budd-Chiari syndrome compared to other subgroups. Patency was better in the subgroups of patients with cirrhosis and other pathologies compared with the PVT subgroup. Substantial changes in referral patterns coincided with the adoption of the MELD in 2002, with decreases in the incidence of cirrhosis and variceal bleeding, and increases in non-cirrhotics and hypercoagulopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the spectrum of diseases benefiting from surgical PSS has changed, surgical shunts continue to constitute an important addition to the surgical armamentarium. Selected subgroups with variceal bleeding in well-compensated cirrhosis and PVT benefit from the excellent longterm patency offered by the surgical PSS.

Endovascular treatment for nonacute symptomatic portal venous thrombosis through intrahepatic portosystemic shunt approach.

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of nonacute symptomatic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) treated by mechanical thrombectomy combined with pharmacologic thrombolysis through an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (IPS) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with nonacute symptomatic PVT were included in this study: five women and eight men, with a mean age of 48.9 y. Indications for therapy were variceal bleeding (n = 7) and abdominal pain, distension, or intermittent melena (n = 6). Through an IPS approach, balloon angioplasty, sheath-directed thrombus aspiration, and continuous infusion of urokinase were performed. Clinical follow-up was performed in all patients. RESULTS: An IPS was successfully created in all patients. After therapy, recanalization of all thrombosed main PVs was achieved. A majority of thrombus was removed and lysed. The overall rate of clinical improvement was 92.3%. One patient died of intraperitoneal bleeding the second day after the procedure, and another two patients experienced minor complications after therapy and recovered completely after conservative medical management. During a mean of 14.9 months of follow-up, two patients experienced recurrent variceal bleeding as a result of shunt dysfunction. Hemostasis was achieved after shunt revision. No other complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Through an IPS approach, mechanical thrombectomy combined with pharmacologic thrombolysis was possible as a therapeutic option for patients with nonacute symptomatic PVT.

Impact of hospital and surgeon volumes in the management of complicated portal hypertension: review of a statewide database in Florida.

Mortality after complex surgical procedures has been shown to be inversely related to hospital volume. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these findings are applicable to radiologic and surgical procedures for complicated portal hypertension. The Agency for Healthcare Administration for the State of Florida database was queried to determine outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic stent shunts (TIPS) or surgical shunts from 2000 to 2003. A total of 1486 patients underwent either TIPS (1321) or surgical shunts (165). Natural breakpoints occurred at two and six procedures per year were correlated with survival for surgical shunts but not TIPS. Overall mortality was not different between TIPS and surgical shunts (11.0 vs. 12.7%, P = 0.51); however, the cost of TIPS was significantly lower (62,000 +/- 58.5 vs. 107,000 +/- 97.8, P < 0.001) as well as the length of hospitalization (9 +/- 9.0 days vs. 15 days +/- 12.6 days, P < 0.001). Surgical procedures for complicated portal hypertension are rapidly being replaced by TIPS. Like with other complex procedures, outcomes are related to hospital volume.

Rotterdam score predicts early mortality in Budd-Chiari syndrome, and surgical shunting prolongs transplant-free survival.

BACKGROUND: Budd-Chiari syndrome carries significant mortality, but factors predicting this outcome are uncertain. AIM: To determine factors associated with 3-month mortality and compare outcomes after surgical shunting or liver transplantation. METHODS: From 1985 to 2008, 51 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome were identified. RESULTS: By logistic regression analysis, features associated with higher risk of 3-month mortality were Rotterdam class III, Clichy >6.6, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) >20 and Child-Pugh C. Rotterdam class III had the best performance to discriminate 3-month mortality with sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.63, whereas Clichy >6.60 had sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.69; MELD >20 had sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.75 and Child-Pugh C had sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.72. Eighteen patients underwent surgical shunts and 14 received liver transplantation with no significant differences in survival (median survival 10 +/- 3 vs. 8 +/- 2 years; log-rank, P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Rotterdam score is the best discrimination index for 3-month mortality in Budd-Chiari syndrome and should be used preferentially to determine treatment urgency. Surgical shunts constitute an important therapeutic modality that may help save liver grafts and prolong transplantation-free survival in a selected group of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Clinical analysis of surgical treatment of portal hypertension.

AIM: To review the experience in surgery for 508 patients with portal hypertension and to explore the selection of reasonable operation under different conditions. METHODS: The data of 508 patients with portal hypertension treated surgically in 1991-2001 in our centers were analyzed. Of the 508 patients, 256 were treated with portaazygous devascularization (PAD), 167 with portasystemic shunt (PSS), 62 with selective shunt (SS), 11 with combined portasystemic shunt and portaazygous devascularization (PSS+PAD), 9 with liver transplantation (LT), 3 with union operation for hepatic carcinoma and portal hypertension (HCC+PH). RESULTS: In the 167 patients treated with PSS, free portal pressure (FPP) was significantly higher in the patients with a longer diameter of the anastomotic stoma than in those with a shorter diameter before the operation (P < 0.01). After the operation, FPP in the former patients markedly decreased compared to the latter ones (P < 0.01). The incidence rate of hemorrhage in patients treated with PAD, PSS, SS, PSS+PAD, and HCC+PH was 21.09% (54/256), 13.77 (23/167), 11.29 (7/62), 36.36% (4/11), and 100% (3/3), respectively. The incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy was 3.91% (10/256), 9.58% (16/167), 4.84% (3/62), 9.09% (1/11), and 100% (3/3), respectively while the operative mortality was 5.49% (15/256), 4.22% (7/167), 4.84% (3/62), 9.09% (1/11), and 66.67% (2/3) respectively. The operative mortality of liver transplantation was 22.22% (2/9). CONCLUSION: Five kinds of operation in surgical treatment of portal hypertension have their advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the selection of operation should be based on the actual needs of the patients.

Determinants of survival and the effect of portosystemic shunting in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare disorder that is characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction. The aim of this study was to assess determinants of survival and to evaluate the effect of portosystemic shunting. In this international multicenter study, 237 patients with BCS, diagnosed between 1984 and 2001, were investigated. Univariate, multivariate, and time-dependent Cox regression analyses were performed. Overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 82% (95% CI, 77%-87%), 69% (95% CI, 62%-76%), and 62% (95% CI, 54%-70%), respectively. Encephalopathy, ascites, prothrombin time, and bilirubin were independent determinants of survival. A prognostic classification combining these factors could identify three classes of patients (classes I-III). The 5-year survival rate was 89% (95% CI, 79%-99%) for class I, 74% (95% CI, 65%-83%) for class II, and 42% (95% CI, 28%-56%) for class III. Anticoagulants were administered to 72%; only for patients in class I was this associated with a trend toward improved survival (relative risk [RR], 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-1.21). Portosystemic shunting was performed in 49% of the patients (n = 117); only for patients in class II, time-dependent analyses suggested an improved survival (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.26-1.49). In conclusion, at the time of diagnosis, patients with BCS can be classified into good (I), intermediate (II), and poor (III) prognostic classes, according to simple baseline clinical and laboratory parameters. Our results suggest an improved survival after surgical portosystemic shunting for patients with an intermediate prognosis (class II).

Budd-Chiari syndrome: current management options.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of current treatment strategies for Budd-Chiari syndrome. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Budd-Chiari syndrome, occlusion or obstruction of hepatic venous outflow, is a disease traditionally managed by portal or mesenteric-systemic shunting. The development of other treatment options, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis, transjugular portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and liver transplantation, has expanded the therapeutic algorithm. METHODS: The authors reviewed the medical records of all patients diagnosed with Budd-Chiari syndrome at the Johns Hopkins Hospital during the past 20 years. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were identified: 13 (24%) male patients and 41 (76%) female patients, ranging in age from 2 to 76 years (median 33 years). Twenty-one (39%) had polycythemia vera, 3 (5.6%) used estrogens, 11 (20%) had a myeloproliferative or coagulation disorder, and in 7 (13%) the cause remained unknown. Forty-three patients were treated with surgical shunting, 24 mesocaval and 19 mesoatrial. Actuarial survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after shunting were 83%, 78%, and 75%, respectively. Of 33 patients surviving more than 4 years, 28 (85%) had relief of clinical symptoms. Five patients required shunt revision and eight had radiologic procedures to maintain shunt patency. Primary and secondary shunt patency rates were 46% and 69% respectively for mesoatrial shunts and 70% and 85% respectively for mesocaval shunts. Clot lysis was successful as primary treatment in seven patients. TIPS was performed in three patients, one after a failed mesocaval shunt. During an average of 4 years of follow-up, these patients required multiple procedures to maintain TIPS patency. Six patients underwent liver transplantation. Of these, three had previous shunt procedures. Five of the transplant recipients are alive with follow-up of 2 to 9 years (median 6). CONCLUSIONS: Both shunting and transplantation can result in a 5-year survival rate of at least 75%, and other treatment modalities may be appropriate for highly selected patients. Optimal management requires that treatment be directed by the predominant clinical symptom (liver failure or portal hypertension) and anatomical considerations and be tempered by careful assessment of surgical risk.

Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt vs surgical shunt in good-risk cirrhotic patients: a case-control comparison.

HYPOTHESIS: In good-risk patients with variceal bleeding undergoing portal decompression, surgical shunt is more effective, more durable, and less costly than angiographic shunt (transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt [TIPS]). DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Academic referral center for liver disease. PATIENTS: Patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis with at least 1 prior episode of bleeding from portal hypertension (gastroesophageal varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy). INTERVENTION: Portal decompression by angiographic (TIPS) or surgical (portacaval, distal splenorenal) shunt. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day and long-term mortality, postintervention diagnostic procedures (endoscopic, ultrasonographic, and angiographic studies), hospital readmissions, variceal rebleeding episodes, blood transfusions, shunt revisions, and hospital and professional charges. RESULTS: Patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis undergoing TIPS (n = 20) or surgical shunt (n = 20) were followed up for 385 and 456 patient-months, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was greater following TIPS compared with surgical shunt (20% vs 0%; P =.20); long-term mortality did not differ. Significantly more rebleeding episodes (P<.001); rehospitalizations (P<.05); diagnostic studies of all types (P<.001); shunt revisions (P<.001); and hospital (P<.005), professional (P<.05), and total (P<. 005) charges occurred following TIPS compared with surgical shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Operative portal decompression is more effective, more durable, and less costly than TIPS in Child-Pugh class A and B cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding. Good-risk patients with portal hypertensive bleeding should be referred for surgical shunt.

[Small-diameter portosystemic shunts: indications and limitations]. / Derivaciones portosistémicas de bajo diámetro. Indicaciones y limitaciones.

Low diameter porto-systemic shunts for the treatment of portal hypertension bleeding have emerged as a consequence of the technical development of vascular grafts (PTFE) that allow the use of a narrow lumen. The experience with this kind of operation at the Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City during a 6-year period is reported. There were twenty-seven patients with good liver function (Child-Pugh A-B) were operated or electively, average Age 47.5 years (range 17-71), twenty three patients with liver cirrhosis, one with portal fibrosis and three with idiopathic portal hypertension. Operative mortality: 4%. Rebleeding: 14%. Postoperative encephalopathy was observed in 14 of 27, three of them being grade III-IV (11%). In the remaining 11 cases, it was mild and easily controlled. Postoperative angiography showed shunt patency in 81% of the cases; in 33% of the cases, portal vein diameter reduction was shown, as well as two cases with portal vein thrombosis. In 77% of the cases, adequate postoperative quality of life was observed. Survival (Kaplan-Meier): 86% at 12 months and 56% at 60 months. These kinds of shunts are a good alternate choice for patients considered for surgery, in which other portal blood flow preserving procedures (selective shunts, devascularization with transection) are not feasible.

Derivaciones portosistémicas de bajo diámetro. Indicaciones y limitaciones / Low diameter porto-systemic shunts. Indications & limitations

Las derivaciones portosistémicas de bajo diámetro (DPBD) para el tratamiento de la hipertensión portal hemorrágica, han surgido como consecuencia del desarrollo de prótesis vasculares (PTFE), que permiten la utilización de diámetros pequeños (8 a 10 milímitros). Se presenta la experiencia en un período de seis años, en la Clínica de Hipertención Portal del INNSZ, en pacientes con buena función hepática (Child-Pugh A-B) y que fueron operados electivamente (N = 31). Edad promedio 47.5 (margen 17.71). Veintisiete pacientes cirróticos, uno con fibrosis portal y tres con hipertensión idiopática. Veintidos en clase A de Child y cinco en clase B. Mortalidad operatoria: 4 por ciento. Recurrencia de hemorragia: 14 por ciento. Encefalopatía posoperatoria en 14 de 27, correspondiendo a grado 1 en 10 casos, controlada con facilidad. En tres casos se encontró encefalopatía grado III - IV (11 por ciento). El estudio angiográfico posoperatorio demostró permeabilidad de la derivación en 81 por ciento de los casos y disminución de diámetro de la porta en 33 por ciento, así como dos obstrucciones (7 por ciento). En 77 por ciento de los casos hubo adecuada calidad de vida posoperatoria. Sobrevida Kaplan-Meier). 86 por ciento al año y 56 por ciento a cinco años. Estas operaciones son una buena alternativa para los pacientes candidatos a cirugía en los cuales no es posible realizar una derivación selectiva o devascularización con transección esofágica

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus H-graft portacaval shunt in the management of bleeding varices: a cost-benefit analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is popular in treating portal hypertension because of its perceived efficacy and cost benefits, although it has never been compared with surgical shunting in a cost-benefit analysis. This study was undertaken to determine the cost benefit of TIPS versus small-diameter prosthetic H-graft portacaval shunt (HGPCS). METHODS: Cost of care was determined in 80 patients prospectively randomized to receive TIPS or HGPCS as definitive treatment for bleeding varices, beginning with shunt placement and including subsequent admissions for complications or follow-up related to shunting. RESULTS: Patients were similar in age, gender, severity of illness/liver dysfunction, and urgency of shunting. After TIPS or HGPCS, variceal rehemorrhage (8 versus O, respectively; p = 0.03), shunt occlusion (13 versus 4; p = 0.03), shunt revision (16 versus 4; p < 0.005), and shunt failure (18 versus 10; p = 0.10) were compared; all were more common after TIPS. Through the index admission, TIPS cost $48,188 +/- $43,355 whereas HGPCS cost $61,552 +/- $47,615. With follow-up, TIPS cost $69,276 +/- $52,712 and HGPCS cost $66,034 +/- $49,118. CONCLUSIONS: Early cost of TIPS was less than, though not different from, cost of HGPCS. With follow-up, costs after TIPS mounted. The initially lower cost of TIPS is offset by higher rates of subsequent occlusion and rehemorrhage.

Selective shunts for portal hypertension: current role of a 21-year experience.

The results of treatment of hemorrhagic portal hypertension with selective shunts over a 21-year period in a selected patient population are reported. Patients selected for surgical treatment had good cardiopulmonary and renal function, and most also had adequate liver function (141 Child-Pugh class A, 59 class B). Among 734 patients treated surgically for bleeding portal hypertension, 221 had selective shunts (168 distal splenorenal and 53 splenocaval shunts). Global operative mortality (in the 21-year period) was 14% and 12% for Child-Pugh A patients. Operative mortality in Child-Pugh A patients in the last 5 years was only 5%. The rate of rebleeding was 6%, rate of incapacitating encephalopathy was 5%, and rate of survival was 65% at 15 years (last 5 years: 88% at 1 year and 85% at 5 years). Good quality of life was demonstrated in 80% of surviving patients. Shunt patency was 94%. Postoperative portal blood flow changes occurred in 23% of cases (8% diameter reduction, 14% thrombosis). Compared with other forms of therapy (pharmacotherapy, sclerotherapy, and transjugular intrahepatic shunting), only liver transplantation offers similar results for these patients. In countries in which liver transplantation is not routinely performed, shunting with selective shunts is the treatment of choice for patients with good liver function.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for patients with active variceal hemorrhage unresponsive to sclerotherapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite urgent sclerotherapy, active variceal hemorrhage has a 70%-90% mortality rate in patients with advanced age, sepsis, renal or pulmonary compromise, tense ascites, or deep coma. The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) performed semiemergently and preceded by stabilization by balloon tamponade in such patients. METHODS: Patients with actively bleeding esophageal or contiguous gastric varices despite sclerotherapy were assessed for risk of dying after emergent portacaval shunt. Those considered to be at high risk were stabilized by balloon tamponade and vasopressin/nitroglycerin and TIPS placed semiurgently within 12 hours. Balloon tamponade and pharmacological therapy were discontinued within 24 hours after TIPS in all cases. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients met entry criteria, and 2 were excluded due to portal vein thrombosis. TIPS was successfully placed in 29 of 30 patients and achieved hemostasis in all. Thirty-day and 6-week survival rates were 63% and 60%, respectively; in those without aspiration, the 6-week survival rate was 90%. After a median follow-up period of 920 days, 46% of the original cohort was alive. Only 2 episodes of early rebleeding and 4 late rebleeds occurred. Eight patients developed encephalopathy. Stent stenosis requiring dilation occurred in 6 of 11 patients within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: TIPS is highly effective as salvage therapy in high-risk patients with active variceal hemorrhage despite endoscopic sclerotherapy.