Health status and quality of life in adult biliary atresia patients surviving with their native livers.

INTRODUCTION: Gaining an insight into the quality of life (QOL) in long-term biliary atresia (BA) survivors is becoming more important. Identifying patients with limitations might make tailor made interventions possible. This is the first study investigating the health status (HS) and QOL in adults surviving BA with their native livers, and comparing them with healthy peers. METHODS: BA patients surviving with their native liver were identified in the Netherlands Study Group on Biliary Atresia Registry database. The RAND-36 and the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument-100 (WHOQOL-100) were used to measure HS and QOL, respectively. Correlation between the RAND-36 and WHOQOL-100 was also assessed. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Impact Event Scale (IES) were also completed. RESULTS: In total, 25 (83%) of the 30 eligible patients after Kasai portoenterostomy completed the questionnaires (median age 23.2 years). A lower perceived level of general health in HS was found as compared with the reference group and a higher score on the social domain was reported in QOL. Correlations between HS and QOL questionnaires were moderate to good. For the group, overall HADS and IES scores were good, though individual patients did score above the cutoff of both the questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Adult BA patients surviving with their native liver have similar HS and QOL as compared with their healthy peers. RAND-36 and WHOQOL-100 questionnaires are not interchangeable, but complementary to assess the patients' outcomes. The overall scores did not point to increased levels of anxiety and depression. However, on an individual level, three and six patients had a score above the cutoff of the HADS subscales demonstrating clinically relevant levels of anxiety and depression, respectively.

Survival patterns in biliary atresia and comparison of quality of life of long-term survivors in Japan and England.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Portoenterostomy is an accepted method of achieving bile drainage in biliary atresia, but there is a paucity of data, including formal quality-of-life (QoL) studies, on long-term survivors. This report includes survival analysis and QoL studies from the world's largest series of cases treated in Japan (1951 to 1998). The Japanese QoL results are compared with a matched group of UK patients from King's College Hospital, London. METHODS: One hundred fifteen Japanese surviving portoenterostomy patients were studied and comparison of trends in survival calculated from 6-year period cohorts. Liver function and hematologic status in a group of 30 long-term survivors (14 to 24 years) were compared with 25 patients from England, (14 to 23 years). Twenty-five Japanese and 21 UK patients (SF-36) completed a QoL questionnaire. RESULTS: Median survival times in Japanese patients before 1975 were less than 1 year but increased to 18 years after 1975. Hematologic and liver function test results did not show any significant differences between the Japanese and UK patients. QoL studies in the UK patients showed no significant difference from normative, general population data. Japanese patients underperformed in general health (P = .01), role emotional (P = .05) and role physical (P = .07) but, overall, there was no significant difference between the Japanese and UK patients except for marginal differences in indices of general health and vitality (P = .06 and .04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival rate in the Japanese patients increased dramatically from 1 year to 17 years after 1975. The QoL of survivors was comparable in Japan and England. The satisfactory comparison with normative population data suggests that we should continue to use portoenterostomy as the primary treatment for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 36:892-897.

Current status of 21 patients who have survived more than 20 years since undergoing surgery for biliary atresia.

Between 1952 and 1993, 289 patients with biliary atresia underwent surgery at the authors' institution. Twenty-two of them survived more than 20 years; one has since died of hepatic failure (at age 28 years). Of the 21 current survivors (age range, 20 to 39 years), 13 underwent hepatic portoenterostomy; the others had hepaticoenterostomy. None of these patients has undergone liver transplantation. Sixteen patients have led near-normal lives. This includes three married women, one of whom has given birth to a healthy baby boy. Of the six patients who had portal hypertension, three underwent both splenectomy and proximal splenorenal shunting in or before 1985. None of these patients has required additional treatment for portal hypertension. The quality of life of one patient has been severely affected by an unrelated condition (Turner's syndrome). A 22-year-old man was diagnosed as having intrahepatic stones 3 years ago. In another 22-year-old man, hepatic dysfunction developed after frequent episodes of cholangitis. He is now being considered for liver transplantation. The majority of the long-term survivors have good quality of life. However, a few continue to suffer from complications including recurrent cholangitis. Close long-term postoperative follow-up is required for patients with biliary atresia.