Early supplemental parenteral nutrition is associated with reduced mortality in critically ill surgical patients with high nutritional risk.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Adequate nutritional provision is important for critically ill patients to improve clinical outcomes. Starting enteral nutrition (EN) as early as possible is recommended and preferred to parenteral nutrition (PN). However, patients who undergo emergency abdominal operations may have alterations in their intra-abdominal environment and gastrointestinal motility leading to limitation in starting an enteral diet. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the benefit of early supplemental PN to achieve adequate calorie and protein supply in critically ill patients undergoing surgery who are not eligible for early EN. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 317 patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) between January 2013 and December 2018. The nutritional data of the patients were collected for 7 days in maximum, starting on the day of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The patients were divided by low or high malnutrition risk using the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score and body mass index. The low- and high-risk groups were subdivided into the following two categories: those who received PN within 48 h ("early") and those who did not ("usual"). Data regarding the baseline characteristics, initial severity of illness, morbidity, and mortality rates were also obtained. The average calorie and protein supply per day were calculated in these groups. RESULTS: Patients in all groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics, initial status, and infectious complications. In terms of outcomes, patients with low malnutrition risk had no significant difference in mortality. However, among patients with high malnutrition risk, the "Early" group had lower rates of 30-day mortality (7.6% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.006) and in-hospital mortality (13.6% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.048) than those of the "Usual" group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for 30-day mortality in these groups also showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). The caloric adequacy of the "Early" group and the "Usual" group were 0.88 ± 0.34 and 0.6 ± 0.29, respectively. Amounts of protein received were 0.94 ± 0.39 g/kg in the "Early" group and 0.47 ± 0.34 g/kg in the "Usual" group, respectively. There was no significant difference in infectious complications between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in patients with high malnutrition risk who received early PN supply within 48 h after emergency surgery for cIAI was lower than those who did not receive PN earlier. PN may be necessary to fulfill the caloric and protein requirements for critically ill patients who cannot achieve their nutritional requirements to the fullest with EN alone.

Postoperative arginine-enriched immune modulating nutrition: Long-term survival results from a randomised clinical trial in patients with oesophagogastric and pancreaticobiliary cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Immune modulating nutrition (IMN) has been shown to reduce postoperative infectious complications and length of stay in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Two studies of IMN in patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer also suggested that this treatment might improve long-term survival and progression-free survival. In the present study, we analysed follow-up data from our previous randomised controlled trial of IMN, in patients undergoing surgery for oesophagogastric and pancreaticobiliary cancer, in order to evaluate the long-term impact on survival of postoperative IMN versus an isocaloric, isonitrogenous control feed. METHODS: This study included patients undergoing surgery for cancers of the pancreas, oesophagus and stomach, who had been randomised in a double-blind manner to receive postoperative jejunostomy feeding with IMN (Stresson, Nutricia Ltd.) or an isonitrogenous, isocaloric feed (Nutrison High Protein, Nutricia) for 10-15 days. The primary outcome was long-term overall survival. RESULTS: There was complete follow-up for all 108 patients, with 54 patients randomised to each group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups by demographics [(age, p = 0.63), sex (p = 0.49) or site of cancer (p = 0.25)]. 30-day mortality was 11.1% in both groups. Mortality in the intervention group was 13%, 31.5%, 70.4%, 85.2%, 88.9%, and 96.3% at 90 days, and 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years respectively. Corresponding mortality in the control group was 14.8%, 35.2%, 68.6%, 79.6%, 85.2% and 98.1% (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Early postoperative feeding with arginine-enriched IMN had no impact on long-term survival in patients undergoing surgery for oesophagogastric and pancreaticobiliary cancer.

The level of postoperative care influences mortality prediction by the POSPOM score: A retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) assesses the patients' individual risk for postsurgical intrahospital death based on preoperative parameters. We hypothesized that mortality predicted by the POSPOM varies depending on the level of postoperative care. METHODS: All patients age over 18 years undergoing inpatient surgery or interventions involving anesthesia at a German university hospital between January 2006, and December 2017, were assessed for eligibility for this retrospective study. Endpoint was death in hospital following surgery. Adaptation of the POSPOM to the German coding system was performed as previously described. The whole cohort was divided according to the level of postoperative care (normal ward vs. intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 24 h vs. later than 24 h, respectively). RESULTS: 199,258 patients were finally included. Observed intrahospital mortality was 2.0% (4,053 deaths). 9.6% of patients were transferred to ICU following surgery, and mortality of those patients was increased already at low POSPOM values of 15. 17,165 patients were admitted to ICU within 24 h, and these patients were older, had more comorbidities, or underwent more invasive surgery, reflected by a higher median POSPOM score compared to the normal-ward group (29 vs. 17, p <0.001). Mortality in that cohort was significantly increased to 8.7% (p <0.001). 2,043 patients were admitted to ICU later than 24 h following surgery (therefore denoted unscheduled admission), and the median POSPOM value of that group was 23. Observed mortality in this cohort was highest (13.5%, p <0.001 vs. ICU admission <24 h cohort). CONCLUSION: Increased mortality in patients transferred to high-care wards reflects the significance of, e.g., intra- or early postoperative events for the patients' outcome. Therefore, scoring systems considering only preoperative variables such as the POSPOM reveal limitations to predict the individual benefit of postoperative ICU admission.

The effects of early enteral nutrition on mortality after major emergency abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early oral or enteral nutrition (EEN) has been proven safe, tolerable, and beneficial in elective surgery. In emergency abdominal surgery no consensus exists regarding postoperative nutrition standard regimens. This review aimed to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of EEN compared to standard care after emergency abdominal surgery. METHODS: The review protocol was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook and reported according to PRISMA. Clinical outcomes included mortality, specific complication rates, length of stay, and serious adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane risk of bias tool and Downs and Black. GRADE assessment of each outcome was performed, and Trial Sequential Analysis was completed to obtain the Required Information Size (RIS) of each outcome. RESULTS: From a total of 4741 records screened, a total of five randomized controlled trials and two non-randomized controlled trials were included covering 1309 patients. The included studies reported no safety issues regarding the use of EEN. A significant reduction in the mortality rate of EEN compared with standard care was seen (OR 0.59 (CI 95% 0.34-1.00), I2 = 0%). Meta-analyses on sepsis and postoperative pulmonary complications showed non-significant tendencies in favor of EEN compared with standard care. GRADE assessment of all outcomes was evaluated 'low' or 'very low'. Trial Sequential Analysis revealed that all outcomes had insufficient RIS to confirm the effects of EEN. CONCLUSION: EEN after major emergency surgery is correlated with reduced mortality, however, more high-quality data regarding the optimal timing and composition of nutrition are needed before final conclusions regarding the effects of EEN can be made.

Disparities in guideline-concordant treatment for node-positive, non-small cell lung cancer following surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To examine guideline concordance across a national sample and determine the relationship between socioeconomic factors, use of recommended postoperative adjuvant therapy, and outcomes for patients with resected pN1 or pN2 non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: All margin-negative pT1-3 N1-2 M0 non-small cell lung cancers treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy without induction therapy in the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2013 were included. Use of guideline-concordant adjuvant treatment, defined as chemotherapy for pN1 disease and chemotherapy with or without radiation for pN2 disease, was examined. Multivariable regression models were developed to determine associations of clinical factors with guideline adherence. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: Of 13,462 patients, 10,113 had pN1 disease and 3349 had pN2 disease. Guideline-concordant adjuvant therapy was used in 6844 (67.7%) patients with pN1 disease and 2622 (78.3%) patients with pN2 disease. After multivariable adjustment, insurance status, older age, pneumonectomy, readmission, and longer postoperative stays were associated with lower likelihood of guideline concordance. Conversely, increased education level, later year of diagnosis, and greater nodal stage were associated with greater concordance. Overall, patients treated with guideline-concordant therapy had superior survival (5-year survival: 51.6 vs 36.0%; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.70, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors, including insurance status and geographic region, are associated with disparities in use of adjuvant therapy as recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. These disparities significantly impact patient survival. Future work should focus on improving access to appropriate adjuvant therapies among the under insured and socioeconomically disadvantaged.

Immortal Time Bias in National Cancer Database Studies.

PURPOSE: In studies evaluating the benefit of adjuvant therapies, immortal time bias (ITB) can affect the results by incorrectly reporting a survival advantage. It does so by including all deceased patients who may have been planned to receive adjuvant therapy within the observation cohort. Given the increase in National Cancer Database (NCDB) analyses evaluating postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) as an adjuvant therapy, we sought to examine how often such studies accounted and adjusted for ITB. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic review was undertaken to search MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2014 until May 2019 for NCDB studies evaluating PORT. After appropriate exclusion criteria were applied, 60 peer-reviewed manuscripts in which PORT was compared with postoperative observation or maintenance therapy were reviewed. The manuscripts were reviewed to evaluate whether ITB was accounted for, the method with which it was adjusted for, impact factor, year of publication, and whether PORT was beneficial. RESULTS: Of the 60 publications reviewed, 23 studies (38.3%) did not include an adjustment for ITB. Most studies that did adjust for ITB employed a single landmark (LM) time (n = 31), 4 used a sequential landmark analyses, and 2 used a time-dependent Cox model. In 23 of 31 studies (74.2%) that did adjust for ITB via a single LM time, the rationale behind why the specified LM time was chosen was not clearly explained. There was no relationship between adjusting for ITB and year of publication (P = .074) or whether the study was published in a high-impact journal (P = .55). CONCLUSIONS: Studies assessing adjuvant radiation therapy by analyzing the NCDB are susceptible to ITB, which overestimates the effect size of adjuvant therapies and can provide misleading results. Adjusting for this bias is essential for accurate data representation and to better quantify the impact of adjuvant therapies such as PORT.

The EMALT Score: An Improved Model for Prediction of Early Mortality in Liver Transplant Recipients.

PURPOSE: Needs, risks, and outcomes of patients admitted to a post liver transplant intensive care unit (POLTICU) differ in important ways from those admitted to pretransplant intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this study was to create the optimal model to risk stratify POLTICU patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent first deceased donor liver transplantation (LT) at a large United States center between 2008 and 2014 were followed from admission to LT and to discharge or death. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the value of various scores in predicting in-hospital mortality. A predictive model was developed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 697 patients underwent LT, and 3.2% died without leaving the hospital. A model for in-hospital mortality was derived from variables available within 24 hours of admission to the POLTICU. Key variables best predicting survival were white blood cell count, 24-hour urine output, and serum glucose. A model using these variables performed with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88, compared to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, which performed with AUCs of 0.74 and 0.60, respectively. CONCLUSION: An improved model, the early mortality after LT (EMALT) score, performs better than conventional models in predicting in-hospital mortality after LT.

Transfer of the care of patients with low risk of mortality in postoperative: experience report. / Transferência do cuidado de pacientes com baixo risco de mortalidade no pós-operatório: relato de experiência.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the implementation of care transfer flow chart in postoperative, based on a risk classification model. METHOD: Experience report on the implementation of a pilot project between the post-anesthetic recovery room and the surgical hospitalization unit, developed between December/2016 and March/2017, aimed at transferring s the care of patients with low risk of postoperative mortality, in a university hospital in the South of Brazil. RESULTS: The project made it possible to expedite the discharge of the patient from the Post-Anesthetic Recovery Room to the surgical hospitalization unit, to qualify the records regarding nursing care and to optimize the time of nurses in both units for care activities. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a care transfer flow chart from the risk classification for postoperative patients contributed to a more effective communication, culminating in improvements in patient safety.

Blood management in hip fractures; are we leaving it too late? A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia in hip fracture patients has been associated with increased risk of allogenic blood transfusion (ABT), poorer functional outcomes and increased mortality. Few studies have reported the prevalence of anaemia on admission or its progression prior to surgery in this cohort. We aimed to measure the prevalence of anaemia on admission in older persons who sustain a hip fracture, identify if anaemia develops or progresses prior to surgery, and to report associations with outcome. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was undertaken in a regional hospital. All patients aged 60 and over, admitted with a primary hip fracture resulting from a simple fall, in the 12 months of 2014 were included. The World Health Organization (WHO) definition of anaemia was used. Pathology databases and clinical records were reviewed to collect data. Repeated measures ANOVA's were used to quantify the progression of anaemia prior to surgery, and Chi square test were used to report associations with outcome variables. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one patients were identified, median age was 81 years. There were twice as many females as males and just over half the sample had extracapsular fractures. Anaemia was present on admission in 45% (n = 117), highest incidence of anaemia occurred in males 52.0% (n = 39), extracapsular fractures 41.9% (n = 78) and those aged over 80 years 49.7% (n = 91). Progression of anaemia prior to surgery was significant in all groups (p < 0.05), with the greatest reduction seen in extracapsular fractures. Pre-surgery reduction in Hb was recorded in 82.3% of patients between admission and day 1, and in 71.4% between admission and day 2. There was significant association between anaemia on admission and PRBC transfusion (p < 0.05), in hospital mortality (p < 0.05) however no association with the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication, nor LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate that pre-surgical anaemia in older hip fracture patients is associated with a PRBC transfusion and increased hospital mortality. Importantly, it also identified that patients continue to bleed after admission, leading to the development of or worsening anaemia. Thus, identification anaemia in the pre-surgical period provides an opportunity for treatment to avoid transfusions and improve patient outcomes.

Posttransplant Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients and Their Donors in Nigeria.

OBJECTIVES: Kidney transplantation is not readily available in low-resource settings because of poor health structure, dearth of experts, and pervading poverty. Although many centers now offer kidney transplant, patients still travel outside Nigeria for this service for many reasons and many return home without a detailed medical report. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of individuals who underwent kidney transplant in Nigeria and elsewhere and who were presently receiving posttransplant care or had received such care from 2002 to 2018 at 4 Nigerian hospitals were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 35 patients (30 males; 85.7%) analyzed (mean ages of 42 ± 16 and 47 ± 8 years for men and women, respectively; P = .54), common primary kidney diseases included hypertension (27.2%), glomerulonephritis (24.2%), and diabetes mellitus/hypertension (18.3%). Most patients received transplants in India (48.6%), with others in Nigeria (23.0%) and Pakistan (8.6%). Relationships to recipient were unrelated (28.5%), living related (22.9%), and unknown (48.6%). Less than 30% of recipients had care details in their hospital records. Almost all transplant patients were treated with prednisolone (81.8%); cyclosporine (40.0%), mycophenolate mofetil (31.4%), tacrolimus (20.0%), and azathioprine (9.1%) were also used. Complications were documented in 88.9%, with 57.0% due to bacterial infections/sepsis. Many (88.9%) had more than 2 complications. In follow-up, median first transplant duration was 24 months (interquartile range, 6-44). Of total patients, 25.7% were still alive, 17.1% had died, and 54.2% were lost to follow-up. Follow-up data for only 2 donors were available. CONCLUSIONS: Lapses in follow-up care of kidney transplant recipients and donors continue in lowresource settings where transplant tourism is still rife, resulting in poor graft/patient survival. Adherence to transplant guidelines is advocated. We propose a transplant stratification model according to level of development and resources of countries or regions. This model will encourage customizing strategies for improving patient outcomes.

Postoperative Low-Dose Heparin Infusion Does Not Change Complication Rates after Limb Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative subtherapeutic low-dose heparin infusion (LDHI) is sometimes administered in patients undergoing extremity arterial revascularization to maintain graft patency and decrease the risk of thrombosis. However, the safety of this management strategy is unknown. METHODS: From 2013 to 2015, we retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing upper and lower extremity arterial revascularization at a single university-affiliated medical center. Patients were grouped by receipt of LDHI within the first 24-hour postoperative period. Preoperative demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative measures, 30-day postoperative complications, arterial patency rates, and amputation rates were analyzed for each group. RESULTS: We identified 379 patients who received extremity revascularization, and 56 (14.8%) of them had received LDHI. Patients who received LDHI were less likely to have an elective admission on presentation (26.8% vs. 56%, P < 0.001) or an admission from home (69.6% vs. 81.7%, P = 0.04). They were more likely to have preoperative bleeding (44.6% vs. 22%, P < 0.01) and need for emergent operation (23.2% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.04). Postoperatively, although patients who received LDHI demonstrated a trend toward increased bleeding (48.2% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.053), they did not demonstrate an increase in 30-day mortality (1.79% vs. 1.24%, P = 0.55) or reoperation (19.7% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.21). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LDHI did not have a significant association with immediate postoperative bleeding (P = 0.99), survival (P = 0.13), primary patency (P = 0.872), and amputation-free survival (P = 0.387). CONCLUSIONS: Although LDHI was more likely to be administered in patients who received emergent operations, risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated that it was not associated with increased postoperative bleeding, mortality, short-term need for reintervention, or amputation after extremity arterial revascularization.

Sustainability of clinical pathway guided care in cardiac surgery ICU patients; 9-years experience in over 7500 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine trends over time regarding inclusion of post-operative cardiac surgery intensive care unit (ICU) patients in a clinical pathway (CP), and the association with clinical outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: ICU of an academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All cardiac surgery patients operated between 2007 and 2015. MEASURES AND RESULTS: A total of 7553 patients were operated. Three patient groups were identified: patients treated according to CP (n = 6567), patients excluded from the CP within the first 48 h (n = 633) and patients never included in CP (n = 353). Patients treated according to CP increased significantly over time from 74% to 95% and the median Log EuroSCORE (predicted mortality score) in this group increased significantly over time (P = 0.016). In-hospital length of stay (LOS) decreased in all groups, but significantly in CP group (P < 0.001). Overall, the in-hospital, and 1-year mortality decreased from 1.5 to 1.1% and 3.7 to 2.9%, respectively (both P < 0.05). Patients with a Log EuroSCORE >10 were more likely excluded from CP (P < 0.001), but, if included in CP, these patients had a significantly shorter Intensive Care stay and in-hospital stay compared to excluded patients with a Log EuroSCORE >10 (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a CP for all post-operative cardiac surgery patients in the ICU is sustainable. While more complex patients were treated according to the CP, clinical outcome improved in the CP group.

Transferência do cuidado de pacientes com baixo risco de mortalidade no pós-operatório: relato de experiência / Transferencia del cuidado de pacientes con bajo riesgo de mortalidad en el postoperatorio: relato de experiencia / Transfer of the care of patients with low risk of mortality in postoperative: experience report

Resumo OBJETIVO Descrever a implantação de um fluxograma de transferência do cuidado de pacientes em pós-operatório, a partir de um modelo de classificação de risco. MÉTODO Relato de experiência sobre a implantação de projeto piloto entre sala de recuperação pós-anestésica e unidade de internação cirúrgica, desenvolvido entre dezembro/2016 e março/2017, visando a transferências do cuidado de pacientes com baixo risco de mortalidade pós-operatória, em um hospital universitário do Sul do Brasil. RESULTADOS O projeto possibilitou agilizar a alta do paciente da Sala de Recuperação Pós-Anestésica para a unidade de internação cirúrgica, qualificar os registros quanto aos cuidados de enfermagem e otimizar o tempo dos enfermeiros, em ambas unidades, para as atividades assistenciais. CONCLUSÃO A implementação de um fluxograma de transferência do cuidado a partir da classificação de risco para pacientes em pós-operatório contribuiu para uma comunicação mais efetiva, culminando em melhorias na segurança do paciente.

Resumen OBJETIVO Describir la implantación de un diagrama de flujo de transferencia del cuidado de pacientes en postoperatorio a partir de un modelo de clasificación de riesgo. MÉTODO Relato de experiencia sobre la implantación de un proyecto piloto entre sala de recuperación postanestésica y unidad de internación quirúrgica, desarrollado entre diciembre/2016 y marzo/2017, con vistas a transferencias del cuidado de pacientes con bajo riesgo de mortalidad postoperatoria, en un hospital universitario del sur de Brasil. RESULTADOS El proyecto posibilitó mayor agilidad del alta del paciente para la unidad de internación quirúrgica, calificación de los registros y cuidados de enfermería referentes al cuadro clínico del paciente, y optimización del tiempo de los enfermeros, en ambas unidades, para las actividades asistenciales. CONCLUSIÓN La implementación de un diagrama de flujo de transferencia del cuidado a partir de la clasificación de riesgo para pacientes en postoperatorio contribuyó a una comunicación más efectiva, culminando en mejoras en la seguridad del paciente.

Abstract OBJECTIVE Describe the implementation of care transfer flow chart in postoperative, based on a risk classification model. METHOD Experience report on the implementation of a pilot project between the post-anesthetic recovery room and the surgical hospitalization unit, developed between December/2016 and March/2017, aimed at transferring s the care of patients with low risk of postoperative mortality, in a university hospital in the South of Brazil. RESULTS The project made it possible to expedite the discharge of the patient from the Post-Anesthetic Recovery Room to the surgical hospitalization unit, to qualify the records regarding nursing care and to optimize the time of nurses in both units for care activities. CONCLUSION The implementation of a care transfer flow chart from the risk classification for postoperative patients contributed to a more effective communication, culminating in improvements in patient safety.

Early post-operative serum albumin level predicts survival after curative nephrectomy for kidney cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that albumin-related systemic inflammation is associated with the long-term prognosis of cancer, but the clinical significance of an early (≤ 7 days) post-operative serum albumin level has not been well-documented as a prognostic factor in patients with renal cell cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients hospitalized for kidney cancer from January 2009 to May 2014. First, the receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to define the best cut-off of an early post-operative serum albumin level in determining the prognosis, from which survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were included. The median duration of follow-up was 54.8 months. Patients with an early post-operative serum albumin level < 32 g/L had a significantly shorter median recurrence-free survival (RFS; 49.1 versus 56.5 months, P = 0.001) and median overall survival (OS; 52.2 versus 57.0 months, P = 0.049) than patients with an early post-operative serum albumin level ≥ 32 g/L. After adjusting for age, BMI, tumor stage, post-operative hemoglobin concentration, and pre-operative albumin, globulin, and hemoglobin levels, multivariate Cox regression showed that an early post-operative serum albumin level < 32 g/L was an independent prognostic factor associated with a decreased RFS (HR = 3.60; 95% CI,1.05-12.42 [months], P = 0.042) and decreased OS (HR = 9.95; 95% CI, 1.81-54.80 [months], P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: An early post-operative serum albumin level < 32 g/L is an independent prognostic factor leading to an unfavorable RFS and OS. Prospective trials and further studies involving additional patients are warranted.

Low-molecular-weight heparin for hip fracture patients treated with osteosynthesis: should thromboprophylaxis start before or after surgery? An observational study of 45,913 hip fractures reported to the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.

Background and purpose - Controversies exist regarding thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. We studied whether the thromboprophylaxis in hip fracture patients treated with osteosynthesis should start preoperatively or postoperatively. Data were extracted from the nationwide Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR). The risks of postoperative deaths, reoperations, and intraoperative bleeding were studied within 6 months after surgery. Patients and methods - After each operation for hip fracture in Norway the surgeon reports information on the patient, the fracture, and the operation to the NHFR. Cox regression analyses were performed with adjustments for age group, ASA score, sex, duration of surgery, and year of surgery. During the period 2005-2016, 96,599 hip fractures were reported to the register. Only osteosyntheses where low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) were given and with known information on preoperative start of the prophylaxis were included in the analyses. Dalteparin and enoxaparin were used in 58% and 42% of the operations respectively (n = 45,913). Results - Mortality (RR =1.01, 95% CI 0.97-1.06) and risk of reoperation (RR =0.99, CI 0.90-1.08) were similar comparing preoperative and postoperative start of LMWH. Postoperative start reduced the risk of intraoperative bleeding complications compared with preoperative start (RR =0.67, CI 0.51-0.90). Interpretation - The initiation of LMWH did not influence the mortality or the risk of reoperation in hip fracture patients treated with osteosynthesis. Postoperative start of LMWH could possibly decrease the risk of intraoperative bleeding.

TRACE (Routine posTsuRgical Anesthesia visit to improve patient outComE): a prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative complications occur in 30-40% of non-cardiac surgical patients and are the leading cause of early postoperative morbidity and mortality. Regular visits by trained health professionals may decrease the incidence of complications and mortality through earlier detection and adequate treatment of complications. Until now, no studies have been performed on the impact of routine postsurgical anesthesia visits on the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. METHODS: TRACE is a prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized interventional study in academic and peripheral hospitals in the Netherlands. All hospitals start simultaneously with a control phase in which standard care is provided. Sequentially, in a randomized order, hospitals cross over to the intervention phase in which patients at risk are routinely followed up by an anesthesia professional at postoperative days 1 and 3, aiming to detect and prevent or treat postoperative complications. We aim to include 5600 adult patients who are at high risk of developing complications. The primary outcome variable is 30-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes include incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative quality of life up to one year following surgery. Statistical analyses will be performed to compare the control and intervention cohorts with multilevel linear and logistic regression models, adjusted for temporal trends and for clusters (hospitals). The time horizon of the economic (cost-effectiveness) evaluation will be 30 days and one year following surgery. DISCUSSION: TRACE is the first to study the effects of a routine postoperative visit by an anesthesia healthcare professional on mortality and cost-effectiveness of surgical patients. If the intervention proves to be beneficial for the patient and cost-effective, the stepped-wedge design ensures direct implementation in the participating hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register/Netherlands Trial Registration, NTR5506 . Registered on 02 December 2015.

Survival Patterns for Patients with Resected N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Prognostic Scoring Model and Heat Map Approach.

INTRODUCTION: The positive-to-resected lymph node ratio (LNR) predicts survival in many cancers, but little information is available on its value for patients with N2 NSCLC who receive postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after resection. We tested the applicability of prognostic scoring models and heat mapping to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with resected N2 NSCLC and PORT. METHODS: Our test cohort comprised patients identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with N2 NSCLC who received resection and PORT in 2000-2014. Prognostic scoring models were developed to predict OS and CSS using Cox regression; heat maps were constructed with corresponding survival probabilities. Recursive partitioning analysis was applied to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to identify the optimal LNR cutoff point. Models and cutoff points were further tested in 183 similar patients treated at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in 2000-2015. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses revealed that low LNR independently predicted better OS and CSS in patients with resected N2 NSCLC who received PORT. CONCLUSIONS: LNR can be used to predict survival of patients with resected N2 NSCLC followed by PORT. This approach, which to our knowledge is the first application of heat mapping of positive and negative lymph nodes, was effective in estimating 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS probabilities.

Postoperative Care Fragmentation Is Associated with Increased 30-Day Mortality after Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Compromised access following bariatric centers-or-excellence designations may have led to increased incidence of non-index readmissions and worsened care fragmentation. We seek to evaluate risk factors and impact of non-index readmissions on short-term mortality during readmission using a national bariatric registry data from 2015. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a national clinical database. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to quantify association between non-index readmissions and 30-day mortality among bariatric patients with 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 4704 patients were identified as undergoing bariatric surgery and readmitted within 30 days. Of these, 325 (6.9%) patients were readmitted to a non-index facility while the rest were hospitalized at the original hospital. Patient characteristics were largely similar between the two comparison groups, although patients with in-hospital complications and non-home disposition during the initial stay were more likely to experience non-index readmissions. Multivariate regression demonstrated that non-index readmission was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.4 for 30-day mortality (95% confidence interval 2.6-9.2, p < 0.01). The most common reason for mortality for both index and non-index readmissions was pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: Care fragmentation may lead to increased 30-day mortality during readmissions following bariatric surgery. Heightened vigilance and longitudinal follow-up planning is recommended for patients with elevated risk for venous thromboembolism.

The Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs and Their Application in Cardiothoracic Surgery.

The perioperative care of the surgical patient is undergoing a paradigm shift. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs are becoming the standard of care and best practice in many surgical specialties throughout the world. ERAS is a multimodal, multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach to care of the surgical patient that aims to optimize perioperative management and outcomes. Implementation, however, has been slow because it challenges traditional surgical doctrine. The key elements of ERAS Pathways strive to reduce the response to surgical stress, decrease insulin resistance, and maintain anabolic homeostasis to help the patient return to baseline function more quickly. Data suggest that these pathways have produced not only improvements in clinical outcome and quality of care but also significant cost savings. Large trials reveal an increase in 5-year survival and a decrease in immediate complication rates when strict compliance is maintained with all pathway components. Years of success using ERAS in colorectal surgery have helped to establish a body of evidence through a number of randomized controlled trials that encourage application of these pathways in other surgical specialties.

Effect of Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Lung Transplantation Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) has an expected median survival of 3 months. Lung transplantation is a potentially lifesaving therapy for AE-IPF. However, the current knowledge of transplantation outcomes during AE-IPF is limited to a few small retrospective studies, reporting only 1-year post-transplantation survival. METHODS: Study population included patients with IPF consecutively listed for lung transplantation at a single institution between the years 2012 and 2016. We collected lung allocation score (LAS), hospitalization, and survival data. The primary outcome was survival among patients transplanted during stable IPF vs during AE-IPF. RESULTS: Of 89 patients with IPF listed for lung transplantation, 52 were transplanted during stable IPF and 37 were hospitalized due to AE-IPF. Of these 37 patients, nine died before transplantation, and 28 were transplanted during AE-IPF. Fifty percent of patients transplanted during AE-IPF died in a mean follow-up of 1.6 ± 1.2 years compared with 12% of patients transplanted during stable IPF who died in a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.2 years. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves post-transplantation after 1 and 3 years for patients who were transplanted during stable IPF were 94% and 90% vs 71% and 60% in patients who were transplanted during AE-IPF (P = .0001). LAS above 80 conferred a 3-year hazard ratio for mortality of 5.7 vs LAS lower than 80 (95% CI, 2.33-14.0; P < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IPF transplanted during AE-IPF had significantly worse short-term and long-term survival compared with patients transplanted during stable IPF. Patients with AE-IPF and very high LAS may not experience the survival advantage expected from lung transplantation.