The role of three-dimensional MRI in the differentiation between angular pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice it is an ongoing challenge to distinguish between angular pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy. With the three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being increasingly used, it is worth exploring its role in differentiating angular pregnancy from interstitial pregnancy. This study aims to investigate how 3D MRI can help reveal the differences between these two special pregnancies in the early diagnosis. METHODS: We reviewed and analyzed the 3D MRI images of 50 patients with interstitial pregnancy and 55 patients with angular pregnancy retrospectively. Imaging features were identified to compare these two special pregnancies, and the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic performance. RESULTS: The significant differences of the 3D MRI imaging features between interstitial pregnancy and angular pregnancy were found in the outline of uterus cavity (p < 0.001), involvement of junctional zone (p < 0.001), the signal of surroundings (p = 0.005), the relationship with round ligament (p = 0.042), and the overlying myometrial thickness (p = 0.041). Furthermore, the multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a series of significant indicators for angular pregnancy, including the junctional zone involvement, being-surrounded by hyper/iso-intensity on 3D images, and the asymmetric outline of uterus cavity. Combining these three imaging features, the AUC (Area under the Curve) of ROC curve was 0.87 in distinguishing interstitial pregnancy from angular pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that 3D MRI can help distinguish angular pregnancy from interstitial pregnancy in clinical practice, with the advantages that conventional MRI or ultrasound does not have. Through the significant image features, 3D MRI plays an important role in improving the timing of diagnosis, avoiding unnecessary interventions, and preventing hemorrhage in clinical practice.

Two cases of angular pregnancy with incomplete abortion treated with hysteroscopy: a case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Angular pregnancy is characterized as implant medial to the uterotubal junction in lateral angular of uterine. It was a rare obstetric complication with severe complications like uterine rupture and retained placenta. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of 2 incomplete aborted angular pregnancy that was diagnosed and treated with hysteroscopy. In this case, both of patient were performed operative hysteroscopy for incomplete abortion, and with the assistance of hysteroscopy, the angular pregnancy was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopy can more intuitively display the conditions inside the uterine cavity, reduce the intraoperative and postoperative complications, and shorten the hospitalization time of patients. During hysteroscopy, angular pregnancy can be visualized in the upper lateral side of the uterine cavity. Based on the investigation results of clinical cases, this is the first case report of hysteroscopy in the treatment of incomplete aborted angular pregnancy.

O papel da ressonância magnética na distinção das gestações intersticial, cornual e angular / The role of magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing interstitial, cornual and angular pregnancies

Apesar da melhora no diagnóstico e tratamento, a gravidez ectópica ainda é a principal causa de mortalidade materna no primeiro trimestre da gravidez. Formas raras podem apresentar um desafio diagnóstico e, sem um diagnóstico adequado, a incidência de complicações e a mortalidade materna estão relacionadas a aumento de seus índices. Os termos "gravidez cornual" e "gravidez intersticial" têm sido utilizados de forma inconsistente na literatura, sendo frequentemente usados como sinônimos do termo "gravidez angular". Uma distinção estrita entre essas entidades pode ter implicações clínicas importantes, porque o curso natural, a propedêutica e os resultados diferem entre eles. A ressonância magnética não é o padrão-ouro para o diagnóstico de gravidez ectópica, no entanto possui relevância significativa no diagnóstico de possíveis complicações decorrentes dessa afecção. Nesse contexto, esta revisão aborda a importância da ressonância magnética na distinção dos tipos de gravidez mencionados, ilustrados por meio de casos do nosso serviço.(AU)

Despite the improvement in diagnostics and treatment, ectopic pregnancies are still the main cause of maternal mortality in the first trimester of pregnancy. Rare forms may present a diagnostic challenge and without adequate diagnosis, the incidence of complications and maternal mortality is greatly increased. The terms "cornual pregnancy" and "interstitial pregnancy" have been used inconsistently in the literature, frequently been used as synonyms and even used interchangeably with the term "angular pregnancy". A strict distinction among these entities can have important clinical implications because the natural course, management and outcomes differ among them. Magnetic resonance imaging is not the gold standard for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, however, it can be useful in the diagnosis of complicated presentations of such ailment. In this context, this review highlights the importance of MRI in distinguishing the aforementioned types of pregnancies, illustrated with few cases from our service.(AU)

Refining Angular Pregnancy Diagnosis in the First Trimester: A Case Series of Expectant Management.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the natural history and outcomes of a large cohort of expectantly managed angular pregnancies diagnosed in the first trimester by specific ultrasound criteria. METHODS: We conducted a prospective case series of women with prenatally diagnosed angular pregnancy at a single academic tertiary care center from March 2017 to February 2019. Participants were identified at first-trimester ultrasound scan using specifically proposed diagnostic criteria for angular pregnancy and followed prospectively. Maternal and fetal data were gathered from the medical record. RESULTS: Forty-two cases of angular pregnancy were identified at first-trimester ultrasound scan. At presentation, 33 patients (79%) were asymptomatic, eight (19%) had vaginal bleeding, and two (5%) had pain. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 7.4±1.0 weeks; the mean myometrial thickness was 5.1±1.6 mm (95% CI 4.6-5.6). At initial follow-up about 2 weeks later, 23 patients (55%) had ultrasound scans that normalized, 13 (31%) cases persisted as angular pregnancies, and six (14%) resulted in early pregnancy loss. After each gestation had been followed until completion, 33 (80%) pregnancies resulted in live birth and eight (20%) in early pregnancy loss. One patient was lost to follow-up. Of the 33 live births, 24 (73%) were vaginal deliveries, nine (27%) were cesarean deliveries, 27 (82%) were term deliveries, and six (18%) were preterm deliveries. There were no cases of uterine rupture, maternal death, abnormal placentation, or hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In 42 cases of angular pregnancy diagnosed by first-trimester ultrasound examination, outcomes were largely positive, with an 80% live-birth rate and a 20% early pregnancy loss rate. Early diagnosis of angular pregnancy using the described criteria may represent an entity that more closely resembles a normal, noneccentric intrauterine pregnancy rather than an ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, most cases can be closely observed and efforts made to expectantly manage pregnancies while awaiting viability.

Hysteroscopic Intact Removal of an Angular Pregnancy with a 5Fr Electrode.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Angular pregnancy is a rare and life-threatening condition in which the embryo is implanted in the lateral angle of the uterine cavity, medial to the uterotubal junction and round ligament. Angular pregnancy is associated with a high risk of uterine rupture of about 23% [1]. No consensus has been achieved regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of angular pregnancy [2]. Thus, the aim of this study was to report a case of hysteroscopic treatment of an angular pregnancy in a 34-year-old women. DESIGN: Step-by-step video presentation of the surgical treatment (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. PATIENT: A 34-year-old woman. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient. INTERVENTION: Hysteroscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A 34-year-old woman was admitted to our Department with pelvic pain at 6 weeks of gestation. ß-Human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) was 5331 mIU/mL. The transvaginal ultrasound showed a gestational sac of 15 × 11 mm in the left uterine angle of an embryo without cardiac activity. The woman opted for a conservative approach with multiple-dose methotrexate [3]. Five days later the ß-hCG increased to 7589 mIU/mL with no regression of pregnancy at the transvaginal ultrasound. Therefore, a surgical approach was offered to the patient [4,5]. Laparoscopy showed normal salpinges, whereas hysteroscopy identified the gestational sac in the left uterine angle. A 5Fr bipolar electrode was used to open the gestational capsular decidua. The chorionic villi were progressively separated from the implantation site. Using grasping forceps we removed the specimen for histologic examination. Histologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of angular pregnancy. On the second postoperative day ß-hCG was 1131 mIU/mL, and the patient was discharged the day after. At the 1-month follow-up visit, ß-hCG and transvaginal ultrasound were negative for pregnancy. The office hysteroscopy showed an empty uterine cavity at 3-months' follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our case shows that hysteroscopy may be used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for angular pregnancy, providing a unique image of the intact removal of the gestational sac.

A Novel Approach to Management of Angular Pregnancies: A Case Series.

Cornual, interstitial, and angular pregnancies are terms that are often used interchangeably in both the literature and clinical setting to describe various ectopic pregnancies. The diagnosis of these pregnancies can be difficult, and fear of disrupting an intrauterine pregnancy can cause hesitation during evaluation and management. In our 2 cases, a combination of transvaginal and 3-dimensional ultrasound images provided assistance in the accurate diagnosis of angular ectopic pregnancies. Traditional management of these pregnancies includes a wedge resection for pregnancy resolution. In this set of 2 cases, we describe a unique surgical approach to resolve these pregnancies using operative hysteroscopy.

Distinguishing between interstitial and angular pregnancies: Is there a role for saline infusion sonohysterography?

OBJECTIVE: Interstitial pregnancy occurs in the intramural segment of the Fallopian tubes, while angular pregnancy is one that is located in one of the lateral angles of the uterine cavity. The differential diagnosis and treatment of these conditions are important. We have used saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) to help in differential diagnosis. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old female with a case of suspected left interstitial ectopic pregnancy was admitted. Her diagnostic laparoscopy showed no tubal ectopic pregnancy, and D&C demonstrated no villi. She underwent SIS which showed a sac in the interstitial part but close to the tubal ostium. The second case involves a 21-year-old female who was 9-weeks pregnant. Ultrasonography could not differentiate between interstitial and angular pregnancy. SIS clearly demonstrated angular pregnancy with a missed abortion, and therapeutic D&C was done smoothly. CONCLUSION: From reviewing past literature, SIS does not appear to have any proven adverse effect on the pregnancy although it is not widely accepted. This article highlights the benefits of using SIS to aid in the differential diagnosis between the two conditions, especially in unusual cases like ours.

Interstitial and angular pregnancies: Case reports and differential diagnosis.

Interstitial and angular pregnancies are rare and have high rates of morbidity and mortality. These terms continue to create confusion and are frequently misused. The standardization of terminology and differentiation of cases is necessary to distinguish between different outcomes. This article aims to report one case of angular and another case of interstitial pregnancies and to discuss clinical and radiological characteristics, prognosis and treatment. These pathologies continue to be confused with each other and with ectopic pregnancy tubal. Therefore, correct diagnosis facilitates appropriate management.

Can the Presence of a Surrounding Endometrium Differentiate Eccentrically Located Intrauterine Pregnancy from Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancy?

OBJECTIVES: Differentiation of an eccentric intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) from an interstitial ectopic pregnancy (EP) is challenging. No sign for differentiation is reported. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the presence of surrounding endometrium (SE) can distinguish eccentric IUP from interstitial EP. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional ethics board; consent acquisition was waived. Cases were identified using ultrasound (US) reports that included the words "interstitial," "cornual," and "angular." Blinded to official reports, one reviewer reviewed US examinations retrospectively for the presence of SE, defined as the extension of endometrial lining around the gestational sac (GS) as an indication of an eccentric IUP. US examinations without SE on the retrospective review were diagnosed as interstitial EP. RESULTS: Forty-four cases were identified from 2007 to 2015. On retrospective review, 20 cases were labeled as eccentric IUP and 24 as interstitial EP. Ten of the 20 cases retrospectively labeled as eccentric IUP had been reported and managed as eccentric IUP prospectively: four followed to a viable second trimester, and six had spontaneous abortion/termination. The remaining 10 cases retrospectively labeled eccentric IUPs because of the presence of SE had been reported and managed as interstitial EP on the official prospective report. There was follow-up suggestion of eccentric IUP in six of the latter discordant pregnancies with non-concordant retrospective and prospective diagnosis: three had hysteroscopy/curettage demonstrating retained products, two had US follow-up showing the GS moving farther down in the uterine cavity, and in one patient, the GS was shown to pass per vagina. Twenty-four of the 44 cases were called interstitial EP both on the retrospective and prospective reviews and were managed as interstitial EP. None of these patients (without SE) had follow-up suggestive of eccentric IUP. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the presence of surrounding endometrium around the GS allows for differentiation of eccentric IUP from interstitial EP.

Right angular pregnancy at seven weeks' gestation: a case report treated by laparoscopic approach.

Angular pregnancy (AP) or implantation of the embryo in the lateral angle of the uterine cavity close to the internal ostium of the fallopian tube is a very rare event. In fact, angular pregnancy refers to implantation of the embryo just medial to the uterotubal junction, in the lateral angle of the uterine cavity. AP must be distinguished, anatomically, from interstitial pregnancy by its position in relation to the round ligament, which crosses the Müllerian duct at the side of the uterotubal junction. AP is associated with a high rate of complications such as bleeding and ruptured uterus due to delayed diagnosis. The authors present a clinical report of AP at seven weeks' gestation without uterine rupture. They performed directly operative laparoscopy because of acute intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Laparoscopy was useful in the treatment of early angular pregnancy and could avoid the need for invasive surgery or hysterectomy.

Anterior placental location influences onset and progress of labor and postpartum outcome.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether placental location at term is associated with delivery outcome. METHODS: A prospective study including 2354 patients with singleton pregnancy at term admitted for vaginal delivery was conducted. Placental position was determined before delivery by ultrasonographic examination performed transabdominally with women in the supine position. Maternal characteristics and delivery outcome such as premature rupture of membranes, induction of labor, mode and gestational age at delivery, indication for cesarean section, duration of the third stage, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and manual removal of placenta were correlated with anterior, posterior or fundal placental locations. RESULTS: Among women enrolled: i) 1164 had an anterior placenta, ii) 1087 a posterior placenta, iii) 103 a fundal placenta. Women with anterior placenta showed: i) a higher incidence of induction of labor (p = 0.0001), especially for postdate pregnancies and prolonged prelabor rupture of membranes (p < 0.0001), ii) a higher rate of cesarean section rate for failure to progress in labor (p = 0.02), iii) a prolonged third stage (p = 0.01), iv) a higher incidence of manual removal of placenta (p = 0.003) and a higher rate of PPH in vaginal deliveries (p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: The present study showed the influence of anterior placental location on the course of labor, with a later onset of labor, a higher rate of induction and cesarean section and postpartum complications. The reason for this influence on labor and delivery complications remains to be elucidated.