Impact of trophoectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on serum ß-hCG levels, time of delivery and birthweight following frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Aim: This study investigated whether trophoectoderm (TE) biopsy adversely impacts serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level on the 15th day of embryo transfer (ET), delivery week and birthweight, between biopsied and unbiopsied embryo groups, in a cohort of women who delivered a singleton baby, following frozen-thawed ET.Methods: All women having had a live birth after blastocyst ETs following frozen ET cycles with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) were included. A control group was selected among women who had a live birth following single frozen blastocyst transfer without PGT-A at the same period in our clinicResults: One hundred fifteen and 173 cycles with- and without-PGT, respectively, were included. Serum ß-hCG level on the 15th day after ET was comparable between the groups (p = .336). Average birthweight of the babies born following biopsied embryos were significantly lower (3200 vs. 3380; p = .027). Women who received trophectoderm biopsied embryos had a significantly higher probability of having a baby weighing ≤1500 g and 1500-2500 g (p = .022) or ≤2500 g (p = .008). Proportion of preterm delivery was significantly higher in the biopsy group (p = .023). However, after adjusting for potential covariates, trophectoderm biopsy did not seem to increase the risk of preterm birth (OR 1.525; 95% CI, 0,644-3.611; p = .338)Conclusions: TE biopsy does not seem to impact serum ß-hCG level on the 15th day after ET. Average birthweight is lower when a biopsied embryo was transferred. After adjusting for potential covariates, trophectoderm biopsy does not seem to increase the risk of preterm birth.

Contemporary trends in PGD incidence, outcomes, and therapies.

BACKGROUND: We sought to describe trends in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, and define the impact on PGD incidence and early mortality in lung transplantation. METHODS: Patients were enrolled from August 2011 to June 2018 at 10 transplant centers in the multi-center Lung Transplant Outcomes Group prospective cohort study. PGD was defined as Grade 3 at 48 or 72 hours, based on the 2016 PGD ISHLT guidelines. Logistic regression and survival models were used to contrast between group effects for event (i.e., PGD and Death) and time-to-event (i.e., death, extubation, discharge) outcomes respectively. Both modeling frameworks accommodate the inclusion of potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1,528 subjects were enrolled with a 25.7% incidence of PGD. Annual PGD incidence (14.3%-38.2%, p = .0002), median LAS (38.0-47.7 p = .009) and the use of ECMO salvage for PGD (5.7%-20.9%, p = .007) increased over the course of the study. PGD was associated with increased 1 year mortality (OR 1.7 [95% C.I. 1.2, 2.3], p = .0001). Bridging strategies were not associated with increased mortality compared to non-bridged patients (p = .66); however, salvage ECMO for PGD was significantly associated with increased mortality (OR 1.9 [1.3, 2.7], p = .0007). Restricted mean survival time comparison at 1-year demonstrated 84.1 days lost in venoarterial salvaged recipients with PGD when compared to those without PGD (ratio 1.3 [1.1, 1.5]) and 27.2 days for venovenous with PGD (ratio 1.1 [1.0, 1.4]). CONCLUSIONS: PGD incidence continues to rise in modern transplant practice paralleled by significant increases in recipient severity of illness. Bridging strategies have increased but did not affect PGD incidence or mortality. PGD remains highly associated with mortality and is increasingly treated with salvage ECMO.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from preimplantation genetic testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) includes methods that allow embryos to be tested for severe inherited diseases or chromosomal abnormalities. In addition to IVF/ICSI and repeated freezing and thawing of the embryos, PGT requires a biopsy to obtain embryonic genetic material for analysis. However, the potential effects of PGT on obstetric and neonatal outcomes are currently uncertain. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This study aimed to investigate whether pregnancies conceived after PGT were associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with spontaneously conceived (SC) pregnancies or pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI. SEARCH METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library entries from January 1990 to January 2021 were searched. The primary outcomes in this study were low birth weight (LBW) and congenital malformations (CMs), and the secondary outcomes included gestational age, preterm delivery (PTD), very preterm delivery (VPTD), birth weight (BW), very low birth weight (VLBW), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes, placenta previa and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM). We further pooled the results of PGT singleton pregnancies. Subgroup analyses included preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), cleavage-stage biopsy combined with fresh embryo transfer (CB-ET) and blastocyst biopsy combined with frozen-thawed embryo transfer (BB-FET). OUTCOMES: This meta-analysis included 15 studies involving 3682 babies born from PGT pregnancies, 127 719 babies born from IVF/ICSI pregnancies and 915 222 babies born from SC pregnancies. The relative risk (RR) of LBW was higher in PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies (RR = 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.32-6.72), but the risk of CMs was not different between the two groups. The pooled results for the risks of LBW and CMs were similar in PGT and IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The risks of PTD (RR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.67-3.64) and HDP (RR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.18-4.47) were significantly higher in PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. Lower gestational age (mean difference [MD] = -0.76 weeks, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.34) and BW (MD = -163.80 g, 95% CI: -299.35 to -28.24) were also noted for PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. Nevertheless, compared with IVF/ICSI pregnancies, the risks of VPTD and VLBW in PGT pregnancies were significantly decreased by 41% and 30%, respectively, although the risk of HDP was still significantly increased by 50% in PGT pregnancies compared with IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The combined results of obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies were consistent with the overall results. Further subgroup analyses indicated that both PGD and PGS pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of PTD and a lower gestational age compared with SC pregnancies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: This meta-analysis showed that PGT pregnancies may be associated with increased risks of LBW, PTD and HDP compared with SC pregnancies. The overall obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT pregnancies are favourable compared with those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies, although PGT pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of HDP. However, because the number of studies that could be included was limited, more randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Impact of preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Pregnancies achieved after PGT or in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). INTERVENTION(S): Systematic search of databases until December 2020 with cross-checking of references from relevant articles in English. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after PGT and IVF/ICSI, including mean birth weight, low birth weight, very low birth weight (VLBW), mean gestational age at birth, preterm birth, very preterm birth, birth defects, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), sex ratio, cesarean section, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta disorder (placenta previa, placenta abruption, placenta accreta), and preterm premature rupture of membranes. RESULT(S): Ultimately, a total of 785,445 participants were enrolled in this meta-analysis, and these participants were divided into a PGT group (n = 54,294) and an IVF/ICSI group (n = 731,151). The PGT pregnancies had lower rates of low birth weight (risk ratio [RR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.98), VLBW (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.81), and very preterm births (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.70) than those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies. However, the PGT group had a higher rate of the obstetric outcome of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.57). The PGT did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, such as those associated with mean birth weight, mean gestational age at birth, birth defects, IUGR, sex ratio, cesarean section, gestational diabetes mellitus, placental disorder (placenta previa, placenta abruption, placenta accreta), or preterm premature rupture of membranes. We performed subgroup analysis with only blastocyst biopsies and found that PGT with blastocyst biopsies was associated with a lower rate of VLBW (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95). The PGT with blastocyst biopsies did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis with only frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, and we found that PGT pregnancies were associated with a lower rate of VLBW (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97), a lower rate of cesarean birth (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99), a higher rate of preterm birth (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18), and a higher rate of IUGR (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.38) than those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The PGT with frozen-thawed embryo transfer did not increase the risk of other adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION(S): The pooled analysis suggested that PGT did not increase the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes. The association between PGT and a higher risk of IUGR requires further investigation.

Gestational carrier pregnancy outcomes from frozen embryo transfer depending on the number of embryos transferred and preimplantation genetic testing: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare gestational age, birth weight (BW), and live birth rates in gestational carriers (GC) after the transfer of 1 or 2 frozen embryo(s) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), with the understanding that several social and economic factors may motivate intended parents to request the transfer of 2 embryos and/or PGT-A when using a GC. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SETTING: An assisted reproductive technology practice. PATIENT(S): All frozen blastocyst transfers with GCs from 2009-2018. INTERVENTION(S): One or 2 embryo frozen embryo transfers with and without PGT-A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth, preterm birth, and low BW. RESULTS: A total of 583 frozen embryo transfer cycles with vitrified high-grade blastocysts (grade BB or higher) to GCs were analyzed. Although the live birth rate was significantly greater in frozen embryo transfers with 2 embryos, after single embryo transfer (SET), the mean gestational age and BW of live births were statistically significantly greater than those of double embryo transfer (DET). The rate of multiple births was 1.9% for SET compared to 20.0% for DET per transfer. Only 3.8% of live births from SET experienced low BW and 0.6% had very low or extremely low BW. By comparison, 12.5% of DET live births were low BW and 5% were very low BW. After SET, 13.4% of live births were preterm, compared with 40% in DET. The analysis also included a total of 194 transfers with PGT-A compared to 389 cycles without. Overall, live births per transfer were not significantly different between these latter 2 subgroups. CONCLUSION: Frozen embryo transfer cycles in GCs with DET were associated with more preterm births and lower birth weights compared with those of SET. Intended parents and GCs should be counseled that DET is associated with greater risks of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes, which mitigates higher live birth rates. The use of PGT-A did not appear to improve the live birth rate.

Child health after preimplantation genetic testing.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Despite the increasing use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for aneuploidy and monogenic diseases, for children conceived using PGT there is limited follow-up beyond 2 years of age. This study examined the health, well-being and development of school-aged children (5-8 years old) conceived following PGT. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of children conceived after IVF with PGT (exposed cohort) and children conceived after IVF without PGT (unexposed cohort) at two IVF clinics in Melbourne, born between 2000 and 2008, recruited with a 1:2 ratio. Mothers of the children completed a questionnaire asking child-specific questions regarding health and well-being, mental health, development, educational achievement and family-specific questions regarding family functioning and parent-child attachment. RESULTS: A total of 155 participants were recruited to the PGT cohort and 303 participants to the IVF-only cohort. There were no differences between the two cohorts with regards to maternal characteristics, birth defect frequency and pregnancy characteristics, apart from delivery by Caesarean section, which was more frequent in PGT singletons (55%) compared with IVF-only singletons (36%). While no significant differences between the PGT and IVF-only cohorts were found for the majority of general health and psychological scales, there were differences when compared with population data. Children in the exposed cohort appeared to have more positive outcomes in many of the measures. CONCLUSION: The data from this study suggest that PGT does not cause adverse outcomes in children. However, the nature (self-report) and small sample size of the study must be taken into consideration when interpreting the data.

Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes? DESIGN: Patients undergoing IVF with homologous single embryo transfer, and who underwent trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between 2013 and 2017, were divided into three groups based on degree of embryonic micromanipulation: once-biopsied, once-cryopreserved (group BC, n = 2603), once-biopsied, twice-cryopreserved (group CBC, n = 95) and twice-biopsied, twice-cryopreserved (group BCBC, n = 15). The primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included positive serum pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage. RESULTS: Group CBC had a significantly lower chance of live birth (adjusted RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.79) and clinical pregnancy (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.85) compared with group BC. Miscarriage rates were similar between groups BC and CBC (adjusted RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.7). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes. Although PGT-A is thought to improve reproductive outcomes on a per transfer basis, caution must be exercised in counselling patients on the possibility of diminishing returns owing to further embryonic micromanipulation after an embryo has been cryopreserved.

Blastomere removal affects homeostatic control leading to obesity in male mice.

Preimplantation embryos are particularly vulnerable to environmental perturbations, including those related to assisted reproductive technologies. Invasive embryo manipulations, such as blastomere biopsy, are applied worldwide in clinical settings for preimplantation genetic testing. Mouse models have previously shown that blastomere biopsy may be associated with altered phenotypes in adult offspring. The aim of the present study was to investigate the specific contribution of blastomere removal to the physiological, behavioral, and molecular regulators of energy homeostasis, as compared to sham manipulation (re-introducing the blastomere into the embryo after its removal) and in vitro culture. Mice derived from 8-cell embryos subjected to blastomere removal displayed: (i) higher body weight and adiposity, (ii) increased food intake and sucrose preference, (iii) decreased time of immobility in the tail suspension test, and (iv) resistance to weight loss after social isolation or following 3 days of physical exercise - compared to mice derived from sham biopsy or from in vitro-cultured embryos. Mice generated after blastomere removal also had increased circulating leptin and leptin gene expression in adipose tissue, as well as increased ghrelin receptor gene expression in the hypothalamus, compared to control mice. The effects of blastomere biopsy on offspring phenotype were sexually dimorphic, with females not being affected. These results indicate that blastomere deprivation, rather than other perturbations of the blastomere biopsy procedure, programs male embryos to develop physiological, behavioral, and molecular dysregulation of energy homeostasis, leading to postnatal obesity.

Preimplantation genetic testing as a component of root cause analysis of errors and reassignment of embryos in IVF.

The risks of embryo/gamete mix-up are a threat to the integrity of the IVF process, with significant implications for affected families. The use of preimplantation genetic testing through single-nucleotide polymorphism array or next-generation sequencing technology can help to identify, characterize and ultimately help, in some cases, to find the root cause, and to mitigate the extent of these errors for a given patient or laboratory.

Integrative Review of Reproductive Decision Making of Women Who Are BRCA Positive.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize research findings about reproductive decision making among women who are BRCA positive. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and CINAHL. STUDY SELECTION: Articles published in English between 2000 and June 28, 2020, about the reproductive decision making of women with a confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted data about participants, study design, analysis, follow-up, and results. We used the modified Downs and Black checklist and Kennelly's qualitative data analysis to rate studies for quality and applicability by using. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included five of 257 screened articles in our synthesis. The total sample size of the five studies was 1,468 women. The most prevalent factors related to reproductive decision making were the impending decisions regarding childbearing and family choices, including decisions about biological children, preventive surgery, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and prenatal diagnosis to prevent further transmission of a BRCA mutation, and family planning. CONCLUSION: A lack of knowledge exists about the reproductive decision-making processes of women who are BRCA positive. A better understanding of this process would provide nurses and other clinicians with the knowledge needed to support these women through their reproductive life choices.

Clinical outcomes of Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) application in couples with chromosomal inversion, a study in the Chinese Han population.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal inversion was considered to have adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes through abnormal gametogenesis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate whether preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) improves pregnancy outcomes for couples with chromosomal inversion. METHODS: A total of 188 cycles from 165 couples with one chromosomal inversion carrier were divided into two groups: PGT (136 cycles, 125 couples) and non-PGT (52 cycles, 50 couples). Biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates of their first transfer cycles, as well as cumulative live birth rates of each cycle and euploidy rates, were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. The euploidy rate of pericentric inversion carriers was not higher than that of paracentric inversion carriers in PGT group (60.71% vs 50.54%, P = 0.073). Similarly, the euploid rate of male carriers was not higher than that of female carriers (61.2% vs 56.1%, P = 0.256). CONCLUSIONS: Due to limitation of retrospective study and small sample size, our current data showed that PGT cannot provide prominent benefits for inversion carriers in the Chinese Han population. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the effects of PGT.

Trophectoderm biopsy protocols can affect clinical outcomes: time to focus on the blastocyst biopsy technique.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two different blastocyst biopsy protocols. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center cohort study. SETTINGS: Private in vitro fertilization center. PATIENT(S): The study included 1,670 frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FETs) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Survival rate (SR) after thawing, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing implantation rate (IR), and live birth rate (LBR). RESULT(S): Eight hundred thirty-five FETs with PGT-A cycles including only embryos biopsied in the sequential blastocyst hatching and biopsy protocol paired with the ablation of one-fourth of the zona pellucida (ZP) were matched with 835 FETs with PGT-A cycles including only embryos biopsied in the day 3 prehatching protocol by female age (±1 year), number of embryos transferred, use of gestational carrier or egg donor, and day of blastocyst transfer. Only FETs with euploid blastocysts graded no lower than 4BB were included, and cycles with fewer than five oocytes were excluded. SR after thawing, CPR, ongoing IR, and LBR were significantly higher in the FET cycles with the embryos biopsied in the sequential hatching and biopsy protocol. Four cases of monozygotic twin pregnancies were reported with the day 3 prehatching protocol and none with the sequential hatching and biopsy protocol. CONCLUSION(S): Our results show, for the first time, that using different blastocyst biopsy protocols can affect clinical outcomes. Because the study was retrospective, our findings should be validated in a prospective trial.

Second-generation preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in assisted reproduction: a SWOT analysis.

Second-generation preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A 2.0) in patients with an unfavourable reproductive and IVF prognosis is becoming common practice, with the aim of improving reproductive outcomes. However, there is still no clear evidence on the possible advantages and drawbacks with regard to this procedure. In this discussion paper, based on a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis, the different aspects of this strategy are evaluated. Current evidence suggests that PGT-A 2.0 should not at present have an indiscriminate application, but it might be indicated in cases in which the risk of aneuploidy is increased.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether pregnancies achieved with trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) have different risks of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with pregnancies achieved with IVF without biopsy. DESIGN: Observational cohort. SETTING: University-affiliated fertility center. PATIENT(S): Pregnancies achieved via IVF with PGT (n = 177) and IVF without PGT (n = 180) that resulted in a live birth. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maternal outcomes including preeclampsia and placenta previa and neonatal outcomes including birth weight and birth defects. RESULT(S): There was a statistically significant increase in the risk of preeclampsia among IVF+PGT pregnancies compared with IVF without PGT pregnancies, with an incidence of 10.5% versus 4.1% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.02; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.10, 8.29). The incidence of placenta previa was 5.8% in IVF+PGT pregnancies versus 1.4% in IVF without PGT pregnancies (aOR = 4.56; 95% CI, 0.93, 22.44). Similar incidences of gestational diabetes, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and postpartum hemorrhage were observed. IVF+PGT and IVF without PGT neonates did not have a significantly different gestational age at delivery or rate of preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal morbidities, or birth defects. All trends, including the significantly increased risk of preeclampsia in IVF+PGT pregnancies, persisted upon stratification of analysis to only singleton live births. CONCLUSION(S): To date, this is the largest and most extensively controlled study examining maternal and neonatal outcomes after trophectoderm biopsy. There was a statistically significant three-fold increase in the odds of preeclampsia associated with trophectoderm biopsy. Given the rise in PGT use, further investigation is warranted.

Perinatal follow-up of children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis between 1995 and 2014.

PURPOSE: We aim to evaluate the safety of PGD. We focus on the congenital malformation rate and additionally report on adverse perinatal outcome. METHODS: We collated data from a large group of singletons and multiples born after PGD between 1995 and 2014. Data on congenital malformation rates in live born children and terminated pregnancies, misdiagnosis rate, birth parameters, perinatal mortality, and hospital admissions were prospectively collected by questionnaires. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-nine pregnancies in 381 women resulted in 364 live born children. Nine children (2.5%) had major malformations. This percentage is consistent with other PGD cohorts and comparable to the prevalence reported by the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT). We reported one misdiagnosis resulting in a spontaneous abortion of a fetus with an unbalanced chromosome pattern. 20% of the children were born premature (< 37 weeks) and less than 15% had a low birth weight. The incidence of hospital admissions is in line with prematurity and low birth weight rate. One child from a twin, one child from a triplet, and one singleton died at 23, 32, and 37 weeks of gestation respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that PGD treatment increases the risk on congenital malformations or adverse perinatal outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 2 149485.

Pregnancy outcomes from more than 1,800 in vitro fertilization cycles with the use of 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

OBJECTIVE: To measure in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes following 24-chromosome single‒nucleotide-polymorphism (SNP)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and euploid embryo transfer. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Fertility clinics and laboratory. PATIENT(S): Women 20-46 years of age undergoing IVF treatment. INTERVENTION(S): Twenty-four-chromosome SNP-based PGT-A of day 5/6 embryo biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maternal age-stratified implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates per embryo transfer; miscarriage rates; and number of embryo transfers per patient needed to achieve a live birth. RESULT(S): An implantation rate of 69.9%, clinical pregnancy rate per transfer of 70.6%, and live birth rate per transfer of 64.5% were observed in 1,621 nondonor frozen cycles with the use of SNP-based PGT-A. In addition, SNP-based PGT-A outcomes, when measured per cycle with transfer, remained relatively constant across all maternal ages; when measured per cycle initiated, they decreased as maternal age increased. Miscarriage rates were ∼5% in women ≤40 years old. No statistically significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were found for single-embryo transfers (SET) versus double-embryo transfers with SNP-based PGT-A. On average, 1.38 embryo transfers per patient were needed to achieve a live birth in nondonor cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Our findings that SNP-based PGT-A can mitigate the negative effects of maternal age on IVF outcomes in cycles with transfer, and that pregnancy outcomes from SET cycles are not significantly different from those of double-embryo transfer cycles, support the use of SET when transfers are combined with SNP-based PGT-A.

Optimal timing for blastomere biopsy of 8-cell embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the optimal timing for blastomere biopsy during the 8-cell stage, at which embryos will have the best implantation potential? SUMMARY ANSWER: Fast-cleaving embryos that are biopsied during the last quarter (Q4) of the 8-cell stage and are less affected by the biopsy procedure, and their implantation potential is better than that of embryos biopsied earlier during the 8-cell stage (Q1-Q3). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Blastomer biopsy from cleavage-stage embryos is usually performed on the morning of Day 3 when the embryos are at the 6- to 8-cell stage and is still the preferred biopsy method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for monogentic disorders or chromosomal translocations. Human embryos usually remain at the 8-cell stage for a relatively long 'arrest phase' in which cells grow, duplicate their DNA and synthesize various proteins in preparation for the subsequent division. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective cohort study. The study group (195 embryos) included all 8-cell stage embryos that underwent blastomere biopsy for PGD for monogenetic disorders and chromosomal translocations in our unit between 2012-2014 and cultured in the EmbryoScope until transfer. The control group (115 embryos) included all embryos that underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection without a biopsy during the same period. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The 8-cell stage was divided into four quarters: the first 5 h post-t8 (Q1), 5-10 h post-t8 (Q2), 10-15 h post-t8 (Q3) and at 15-20 h post-t8 (Q4). Non-biopsied control embryos were divided into four equivalent quarters. Embryos were evaluated for timing of developmental events following biopsy including timing of first cleavge after biopsy, timing of comapction (tM) and start of blastulation (tSB). Timing of these events were compared between PGD and control embryos, as well as with 56 PGD implanted embryos with Known Implantation Data (PGD-KID-positive embryos). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Embryos that were biopsied during Q3 (10-15 h from entry into 8-cell stage) were delayed in all three subsequent developmental events, including first cleavage after biopsy, compaction and start of blastulation. In contrast, these events occurred exactly at the same time as in the control group, in embryos that were biopsied during Q1, Q2 or Q4 of the 8-cell stage. The results show also that embryos that were biopsied during Q1, Q2 or Q3 of the 8-cell stage demonstrated a significant delay from the biopsied implanted embryos already in t8 as well as in tM and tSB. However, embryos that were biopsied during Q4 demonstrated dynamics similar to those of the biopsied implanted embryos in t8 and tM, and a delay was noticed only in the last stage of tSB. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a retrospective study that is limited to the timing of biopsy that is routinely performed in the IVF lab. A prospective study in which biopsy will be performed at a desired timing is needed in order to differ between the effect of biopsy itself and the cleavage rate of the embryo. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings showed that blastomere biopsy can be less harmful to further development if it is carried out during a critical period of embryonic growth, i.e during Q4 of the 8-cell stage. They also demonstrated the added value of time-lapse microscopy for determining the optimal timing for blastomere biopsy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by the routine budget of our IVF unit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Developmental outcome of 9-year-old children born after PGS: follow-up of a randomized trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does Day-3 cleavage-stage PGS affect neurodevelopment of 9-year-old IVF offspring? SUMMARY ANSWER: We did not find evidence of adverse consequences of Day-3 cleavage-stage PGS on neurodevelopment of 9-year-old IVF offspring, although children born after IVF with or without PGS often had a non-optimal neurological condition. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Knowledge on long-term sequelae for development and health of children born following PGS is lacking. This is striking as evidence accumulates that IVF itself is associated with increased risk for impaired health and development in the offspring. STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: This prospective, assessor-blinded, multicentre, follow-up study evaluated development and health of 9-year-old IVF children born to women who were randomly assigned to IVF with PGS (PGS group) or without PGS (control group). The follow-up examination at 9 years took place between March 2014 and May 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In total, 408 women were included and randomly assigned to IVF with or without Day-3 cleavage-stage PGS. This resulted in 52 ongoing pregnancies in the PGS group and 74 in the control group. In the PGS group, 59 children were born alive; in the control group, 85 children were born alive. At the age of 9 years, 43 children born after PGS and 56 control children participated in the study. Our primary outcome was the neurological optimality score, a sensitive measure of neurological condition assessed with a standardized, age-specific test (Touwen test). Secondary outcomes were adverse neurological condition (neurologically abnormal and the complex form of minor neurological dysfunction), cognitive development (intelligence quotient and specific domains), behaviour (parental and teacher's questionnaires), blood pressure and anthropometrics. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Neurodevelopmental outcome of PGS children did not differ from that of controls; the neurological optimality scores (mean values [(95% CI]: PGS children 51.5 [49.3; 53.7], control children 53.1 [50.5; 55.7]) were not significantly different. The prevalences of adverse neurological outcome (in all but one child implying the presence of the complex form of minor neurological dysfunction) did not differ between the groups (PGS group 17/43 [40%], control group 19/56 [34%]), although the prevalence of complex minor neurological dysfunction in both groups was rather high. Also intelligence quotient scores of the two groups were not significantly different (PGS group 114 [108; 120]); control group 117 [109; 125]), and the behaviour, blood pressure and anthropometrics of both groups did not differ. Mean blood pressures of both groups were above the 60th percentile. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The power analysis of the study was not based on the number of children needed for the follow-up study, but on the number of women who were needed to detect an increase in ongoing pregnancy rates after PGS. In addition, our study evaluated embryo biopsy in the form of PGS at cleavage stage (Day-3 embryo biopsy), while currently PGS at blastocyst stage (Day-5 embryo biopsy) is recommended and increasingly being used. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings indicate that PGS in cleavage stage embryos is not associated with adverse effects on neurological, cognitive and behavioural development, blood pressure and anthropometrics of offspring at 9 years. This is a reassuring finding as embryo biopsy in the forms of PGS and PGD is increasingly applied. However, both groups of IVF offspring showed high prevalences of the clinically relevant form of minor neurological dysfunction, which is a point of concern for the IVF community. In addition, our study confirms findings of others that IVF offspring may be at risk of an unfavourable cardiovascular outcome. These findings are alarming and highlight the importance of research on the underlying mechanisms of unfavourable neurodevelopmental and cardiovascular outcomes in IVF offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The randomized controlled trial was financially supported by the Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), The Netherlands (Grant number 945-03-013). The follow-up was financially supported by the University Medical Center Groningen (Grant number: 754510), the Cornelia Foundation, and the graduate schools BCN and Share, Groningen, The Netherlands. The sponsors of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. There are no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN76355836.