Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.738
Filter
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 184, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783183

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The findings of pre-operative investigations help to identify risk factors that may affect the course of surgery or post-operative recovery by contributing to informed consent conversations between the surgical team and the patient, as well as guiding surgical and anesthetic planning. Certainly, preoperative tests are valuable when they offer additional information beyond what can be gathered from a patient's history and physical examination alone. Preoperative testing practices differ significantly among hospitals, and even within the same hospital, clinicians may have varying approaches to requesting tests. This study aimed to investigate preoperative testing practices and compare them with the latest guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). METHODS: This three-month institutionally based study was carried out at the Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from May 1 to July 30, 2023, including individuals aged 16 years and older who were not pregnant and had undergone elective surgery in the gynecological, orthopedic, and general units. Data on the sociodemographic characteristics, the existence of comorbidities, the invasiveness of surgery, and the tests taken into consideration by the guideline were gathered using a self-administered questionnaire. After rigorously analyzing and revising the results of preoperative investigation approaches, we compared them to the standard of recommendations. Moreover, the data was analyzed and graphically presented using Microsoft Excel 2013. RESULTS: During the data collection period, 247 elective patients underwent general, orthopedic, and gynecological operations. The majority of patients, 107 (43.32%), were between the ages of 16 and 40 and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class one (92.71%). 350 investigations were requested in total. Of these, 71 (20.28%) tests were ordered without a justified reason or in contravention of NICE recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In our hospital's surgical clinical practice, unnecessary preoperative testing is still common, especially when it comes to organ function tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and complete blood counts (FBCs). When deciding whether preoperative studies are required, it is critical to consider aspects including a complete patient history, a physical examination, and the invasiveness of the surgery.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures , Preoperative Care , Humans , Female , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Middle Aged , Male , Adult , Aged , Clinical Audit , Young Adult , Adolescent , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Crit Care Nurse ; 44(3): 36-44, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821528

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with anemia have poorer outcomes following cardiac surgery than do those without anemia. To improve outcomes, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery cardiac recommendations include optimizing patients' condition, including treating anemia, before surgery. LOCAL PROBLEM: Despite implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiatives, a midwestern cardiothoracic surgery group recognized a care gap in preoperative patients with anemia. No standardized protocol was in use. METHODS: An anemia optimization protocol was developed for perioperative care of patients with anemia. Data from retrospective medical record review were analyzed to determine relationships between protocol use and secondary outcomes. The protocol was created using best evidence and expert consensus. Cardiac surgery and hematology specialists revised the protocol and agreed on a final version. The protocol was integrated into the consultation process for cardiac surgery patients. RESULTS: During the implementation period, 23 of 55 patients with anemia (42%) received interventions via the anemia optimization protocol. The mean quantity of packed red blood cells transfused perioperatively per patient was 1.9 U in the protocol group and 3.5 U in the nonprotocol group. In the subgroup of patients experiencing postoperative acute kidney injury, the mean increase in creatinine level was 0.65 mg/dL in the protocol group and 1.52 mg/dL in the nonprotocol group. Four patients in the protocol group (17%) and 6 patients in the nonprotocol group (19%) experienced postoperative acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION: Preoperative anemia is associated with poorer cardiac surgical outcomes. Incorporating the anemia optimization protocol into practice may mitigate the risk of postoperative complications for patients with anemia. Continued use of the protocol is recommended.


Subject(s)
Anemia , Preoperative Care , Quality Improvement , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Preoperative Care/standards , Preoperative Care/methods , Clinical Protocols/standards , Aged, 80 and over , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/standards , Adult , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/standards , Critical Care Nursing/standards
3.
Anaesthesiologie ; 73(5): 294-323, 2024 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700730

ABSTRACT

The 70 recommendations summarize the current status of preoperative risk evaluation of adult patients prior to elective non-cardiothoracic surgery. Based on the joint publications of the German scientific societies for anesthesiology and intensive care medicine (DGAI), surgery (DGCH), and internal medicine (DGIM), which were first published in 2010 and updated in 2017, as well as the European guideline on preoperative cardiac risk evaluation published in 2022, a comprehensive re-evaluation of the recommendation takes place, taking into account new findings, the current literature, and current guidelines of international professional societies. The revised multidisciplinary recommendation is intended to facilitate a structured and common approach to the preoperative evaluation of patients. The aim is to ensure individualized preparation for the patient prior to surgery and thus to increase patient safety. Taking into account intervention- and patient-specific factors, which are indispensable in the preoperative risk evaluation, the perioperative risk for the patient should be minimized and safety increased. The recommendations for action are summarized under "General Principles (A)," "Advanced Diagnostics (B)," and the "Preoperative Management of Continuous Medication (C)." For the first time, a rating of the individual measures with regard to their clinical relevance has been given in the present recommendation. A joint and transparent agreement is intended to ensure a high level of patient orientation while avoiding unnecessary preliminary examinations, to shorten preoperative examination procedures, and ultimately to save costs. The joint recommendation of DGAI, DGCH and DGIM reflects the current state of knowledge as well as the opinion of experts. The recommendation does not replace the individualized decision between patient and physician about the best preoperative strategy and treatment.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , Critical Care , Elective Surgical Procedures , Preoperative Care , Humans , Preoperative Care/standards , Preoperative Care/methods , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Adult , Anesthesiology/standards , Germany , Critical Care/standards , Internal Medicine/standards , Risk Assessment , Societies, Medical , General Surgery/standards
4.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 45(6): e26662, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646998

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Accurate presurgical brain mapping enables preoperative risk assessment and intraoperative guidance. This cross-sectional study investigated whether constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) methods were more accurate than diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based methods for presurgical white matter mapping using intraoperative direct electrical stimulation (DES) as the ground truth. METHODS: Five different tractography methods were compared (three DTI-based and two CSD-based) in 22 preoperative neurosurgical patients undergoing surgery with DES mapping. The corticospinal tract (CST, N = 20) and arcuate fasciculus (AF, N = 7) bundles were reconstructed, then minimum distances between tractograms and DES coordinates were compared between tractography methods. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used for both bundles. For the CST, binary agreement, linear modeling, and posthoc testing were used to compare tractography methods while correcting for relative lesion and bundle volumes. RESULTS: Distance measures between 154 positive (functional response, pDES) and negative (no response, nDES) coordinates, and 134 tractograms resulted in 860 data points. Higher agreement was found between pDES coordinates and CSD-based compared to DTI-based tractograms. ROC curves showed overall higher sensitivity at shorter distance cutoffs for CSD (8.5 mm) compared to DTI (14.5 mm). CSD-based CST tractograms showed significantly higher agreement with pDES, which was confirmed by linear modeling and posthoc tests (PFWE < .05). CONCLUSIONS: CSD-based CST tractograms were more accurate than DTI-based ones when validated using DES-based assessment of motor and sensory function. This demonstrates the potential benefits of structural mapping using CSD in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Diffusion Tensor Imaging , Electric Stimulation , Humans , Diffusion Tensor Imaging/methods , Diffusion Tensor Imaging/standards , Adult , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electric Stimulation/methods , Brain Mapping/methods , Brain Mapping/standards , Pyramidal Tracts/diagnostic imaging , White Matter/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Aged
5.
Int J Cardiol ; 407: 132015, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609053

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend standard pre-operative cardiac screening in all liver transplantation (LT) recipients, despite the relatively low prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Most LT recipients often have non-gated computed tomography (CT) performed of the chest and abdomen. This study evaluated the ability of coronary artery calcification (CAC) assessment on consecutively available scans, to identify a selection of low-risk patients, in whom further cardiac imaging can be safely withheld. METHODS: LT recipients with prior non-gated CT chest-abdomen were included. CAC was visually scored on a semi-quantitative ordinal scale. Stress myocardial perfusion, coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were used as golden standard. The sensitivity and specificity of CAC to exclude and predict obstructive CAD were assessed. In addition, peri- and postoperative mortality and cardiac events were analyzed. RESULTS: 149 LT recipients (ranged 31-71 years) were included. In 75% of patients, no CAC and mild CAC could rule out obstructive CAD on CCTA and ICA with 100% certainty. The threshold of mild CAC had a sensitivity of 100% for both CCTA and ICA and a specificity of 91% and 68%, respectively. None of the patients with no or mild calcifications experienced peri- and post-operative cardiac events or died of cardiac causes. CONCLUSION: Visual evaluation of CAC on prior non-gated CT can accurately and safely exclude obstructive CAD in LT recipients. Incorporation of these already available data can optimize cardiac screening, by safely withholding or correctly allocating dedicated cardiac imaging in LT recipients. Thereby, reducing patients' test burden and save health care expenses.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Liver Transplantation , Preoperative Care , Vascular Calcification , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies
6.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 197: 104354, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38614268

ABSTRACT

Preoperative biopsy for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) enables appropriate multidisciplinary treatment planning. A systematic review of literature from 1990 to June 2022 was conducted using the population, intervention, comparison and outcome model to evaluate the local recurrence and overall survival of preoperative biopsy compared to those that had not. Of 3192 studies screened, five retrospective cohort studies were identified. Three reported on biopsy needle tract seeding, with only one study reporting biopsy site recurrence of 2 %. Two found no significant difference in local recurrence and one found higher 5-year local recurrence rates in those who had not been biopsied. Three studies reported overall survival, including one with propensity matching, did not show a difference in overall survival. In conclusion, preoperative core needle biopsy of RPS is not associated with increased local recurrence or adverse survival outcomes.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms , Sarcoma , Humans , Australia/epidemiology , Biopsy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , New Zealand/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preoperative Care/standards , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/mortality , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Sarcoma/mortality , Sarcoma/pathology , Sarcoma/diagnosis , Sarcoma/therapy
7.
World J Surg ; 48(5): 1014-1024, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) published guidelines recommending against routine preoperative laboratory testing for low-risk patients to reduce unnecessary medical expenditures. The aim of this study was to assess the change in routine preoperative laboratory testing in low-risk versus higher-risk patients before and after release of these guidelines. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database, 2005-2018, was separated into low-risk versus higher-risk patients based upon a previously published stratification. The guideline implementation date was defined as January 2013. Changes in preoperative laboratory testing over time were compared between low- and higher-risk patients. A difference-in-differences model was applied. The primary outcome included any laboratory test obtained ≤90 days prior to surgery. RESULTS: Of 7,507,991 patients, 972,431 (13.0%) were defined as low-risk and 6,535,560 (87.0%) higher-risk. Use of any preoperative laboratory test declined in low-risk patients from 66.5% before to 59.6% after guidelines, a 6.9 percentage point reduction, versus 93.0%-91.9% in higher-risk patients, a 1.1 percentage point reduction (p < 0.0001, comparing percentage point reductions). After risk-adjustment, the adjusted odds ratio for having any preoperative laboratory test after versus before the guidelines was 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.78) in low-risk versus 0.93 (0.92-0.94) in higher-risk patients. In low-risk patients, lack of any preoperative testing was not associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: While a majority of low-risk patients continue to receive preoperative laboratory testing not recommended by the ASA, there has been a decline after implementation of guidelines. Continued effort should be directed at the deimplementation of routine preoperative laboratory testing for low-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preoperative Care , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Preoperative Care/standards , Preoperative Care/methods , Societies, Medical , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards
8.
Urologie ; 62(10): 1025-1033, 2023 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37682348

ABSTRACT

Against the background of typical geriatric multimorbidity and with the particular vulnerability of geriatric patients, polypharmacy deserves special attention. In accordance with the guidelines, medication should not only be reviewed regularly, but also on an ad hoc basis and with each hospital stay-and also in the context of prehabilitation. Thus, not only substances that interfere with the currently planned intervention, anesthesia, or risk of bleeding should be considered, but any medication that increases common risks for geriatric patients. These include drugs that cause or increase a tendency to fall, induce delirium, or alter the comedication through potential drug-drug interactions. Measures to minimize the risk include the following: exact documentation of medications, structured and complete transfer of information, patient and family training about any side effects that may occur, a recall system for possible laboratory checks, and compliance with the instructions for taking the medication.


Subject(s)
Medication Review , Multimorbidity , Polypharmacy , Preoperative Care , Aged , Humans , Polypharmacy/prevention & control , Hospitalization , Drug Interactions , Preoperative Care/rehabilitation , Preoperative Care/standards
10.
World Neurosurg ; 157: e410-e416, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34673239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) in risk stratification for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and to investigate the diagnostic value of Caprini score combined with D-dimer in predicting DVT. METHODS: This study involved 429 patients with thoracolumbar fractures caused by high-energy injuries between October 2016 and November 2019. All patients were treated surgically and had a mean age of 45.3 ± 11.4 years. Patients were risk-stratified using the 2013 Caprini RAM. Mechanical and chemical prophylaxis were used for DVT. Duplex ultrasound of both lower extremities was performed before surgery. RESULTS: Of the 429 patients, 62 (14.45%) developed DVT. The incidence of preoperative DVT was correlated with Caprini score according to risk stratification(χ2 = 117.4, P < 0.001). Based on the original Caprini RAM, all the patients scored in the highest risk category (score ≥5). Further substratification showed that the majority (277 of 429, 64.57%) of the patients were in the Caprini score range 7-8 and the risk of preoperative DVT was significantly higher among patients with Caprini score >10. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of Caprini score and D-dimer was 0.816 and 0.769 when Caprini score >8 or D-dimer >1.81mg/L was considered the criterion of predicting the risk of DVT. When combining the 2 variables, the area under the ROC curve can increase to 0.846. CONCLUSIONS: The Caprini RAM is an effective and reliable DVT risk stratification tool in patients with thoracolumbar fractures caused by high-energy injuries. Caprini score >8 or D-dimer >1.81 mg/L may predict the occurrence of preoperative DVT and the Caprini score combined with D-dimer exhibit better diagnostic performance.


Subject(s)
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Preoperative Care/standards , Spinal Fractures/blood , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Venous Thrombosis/blood , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/standards , Spinal Fractures/diagnosis , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis , Venous Thrombosis/surgery
11.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 88(5): 380-389, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34636222

ABSTRACT

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Head injured patients may frequently require emergency neurosurgery. The perioperative TBI period is very important as many interventions done in this stage can have a profound effect on the long-term neurological outcome. This practical concise narrative review focused mainly on: 1) the management of severe TBI patients with neurosurgical lesions admitted to a spoke center (i.e. hospital without neurosurgery) and therefore needing a transfer to the hub center (i.e. hospital with neurosurgery); 2) the management of severe TBI patients with intracranial hypertension/brain herniation awaiting for neurosurgery; and 3) the neuromonitoring-oriented management in the immediate post-operative period. The proposals presented in this review mainly apply to severe TBI patients admitted to high-income countries.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Intracranial Hypertension/therapy , Neurosurgery , Brain/physiopathology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/surgery , Emergencies , Humans , Neurosurgery/methods , Neurosurgery/standards , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Care/standards , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards
12.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 51(1): 102236, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34592437

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the determination of presence and extent of DIE with special emphasis on effects of MRI reporting training MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 80 patients with clinically suspected DIE presented at our certified endometriosis center between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. For all patients an ENZIAN score (describing DIE related to individual anatomical localizations) was obtained based on the preoperative MRI findings. The intraoperatively determined ENZIAN score served as the reference for assessment of diagnostic performance of the MRI. RESULTS: Overall, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the diagnosis of DIE by MRI were 76.9%, 53.3%, 87.7% and 34.8%, respectively. Analysis by compartment revealed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 59.5%, 88.2%, 86.2% and 63.9%, respectively, for compartment A, with similar values for compartment B, and 50.0%, 88.9%, 64.7% and 81.4%, respectively, for the less often affected compartment C. Expert training (n = 32 before, n = 48 after) led to a considerable increase in sensitivities for the overall detection of DIE (84.6% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.071) and for the detection of DIE in compartment A (71.4% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.026), compartment B (66.7% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.057) and compartment C (75.0% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.010), without significant loss in specificity (all p > 0.50). DISCUSSION: After expert training, MRI has a good sensitivity with fair specificity regarding preoperative assessment of presence, location and extent of DIE.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Endometriosis/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Preoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
13.
Surgery ; 171(2): 267-274, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34465470

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative laboratory testing is not recommended for American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1 or 2 patients before low-risk ambulatory surgery. METHODS: The 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set was retrospectively queried for American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients who underwent low-risk, elective outpatient anorectal, breast, endocrine, gynecologic, hernia, otolaryngology, oral-maxillofacial, orthopedic, plastic/reconstructive, urologic, and vascular operations. Preoperative laboratory testing was defined as any chemistry, hematology, coagulation, or liver function studies obtained ≤30 days preoperatively. Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between those with and without testing. The numbers needed to test to prevent serious morbidity or any complication were calculated. Laboratory testing costs were estimated using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. RESULTS: Of 111,589 patients studied, 57,590 (51.6%) received preoperative laboratory testing; 26,709 (46.4%) had at least 1 abnormal result. Factors associated with receiving preoperative laboratory testing included increasing age, female sex, non-White race/ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2, diabetes, dyspnea, hypertension, obesity, and steroid use. Mortality did not differ between patients with and without testing. The complication rate was 2.5% among tested patients and 1.7% among patients without tests (P < .01). The numbers needed to test was 599 for serious morbidity and 133 for any complication. An estimated $373 million annually is spent on preoperative laboratory testing in this population. CONCLUSION: Despite American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines, a majority of American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients undergo preoperative laboratory testing before elective low-risk outpatient surgery. The differences in the rates of complications between patients with and without testing is low. Preoperative testing should be used more judiciously in this population, which may lead to cost savings.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Elective Surgical Procedures , Preoperative Care/standards , Quality Improvement , Adult , Cost Savings , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/economics , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preoperative Care/economics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Anesthesiology ; 136(2): 268-278, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frailty is increasingly being recognized as a public health issue, straining healthcare resources and increasing costs to care for these patients. Frailty is the decline in physical and cognitive reserves leading to increased vulnerability to stressors such as surgery or disease states. The goal of this pilot diagnostic accuracy study was to identify whether point-of-care ultrasound measurements of the quadriceps and rectus femoris muscles can be used to discriminate between frail and not-frail patients and predict postoperative outcomes. This study hypothesized that ultrasound could discriminate between frail and not-frail patients before surgery. METHODS: Preoperative ultrasound measurements of the quadriceps and rectus femoris were obtained in patients with previous computed tomography scans. Using the computed tomography scans, psoas muscle area was measured in all patients for comparative purposes. Frailty was identified using the Fried phenotype assessment. Postoperative outcomes included unplanned intensive care unit admission, delirium, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, unplanned skilled nursing facility admission, rehospitalization, falls within 30 days, and all-cause 30-day and 1-yr mortality. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients and 20 healthy volunteers were included. Frailty was identified in 18 of the 32 patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that quadriceps depth and psoas muscle area are able to identify frailty (area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.97] and 0.88 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.00], respectively), whereas the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris is less promising (area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.91]). Quadriceps depth was also associated with unplanned postoperative skilled nursing facility discharge disposition (area under the curve 0.81 [95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00]) and delirium (area under the curve 0.89 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.00]). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to computed tomography measurements of psoas muscle area, preoperative ultrasound measurements of quadriceps depth shows promise in discriminating between frail and not-frail patients before surgery. It was also associated with skilled nursing facility admission and postoperative delirium.


Subject(s)
Frailty/diagnostic imaging , Frailty/surgery , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Preoperative Care/standards , Ultrasonography, Interventional/standards , Aged , Female , Frailty/physiopathology , Hand Strength/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods
15.
AANA J ; 90(6): 12-14, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809184

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented significant patient and provider safety concerns, notably for clinicians involved in aerosol-generating procedures. Healthcare systems established new and innovative ways to function safely and maintain operations, including mandatory preoperative testing, changes to patient scheduling, infection control practices, staffing, surgical prioritization, environmental cleaning, and operating room processing. This article provides practice and policy considerations for preprocedure COVID-19 testing, taking into consideration the available evidence and variability in community prevalence, rate of vaccinations, and new COVID-19 variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Nurse Anesthetists , Infection Control/standards , Infection Control/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , United States
16.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 12: 795281, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34950109

ABSTRACT

In the past decade, the use of intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) in thyroid and parathyroid surgery has been widely accepted by surgeons as a useful technology for improving laryngeal nerve identification and voice outcomes, facilitating neurophysiological research, educating and training surgeons, and reducing surgical complications and malpractice litigation. Informing patients about IONM is not only good practice and helpful in promoting the efficient use of IONM resources but is indispensable for effective shared decision making between the patient and surgeon. The International Neural Monitoring Study Group (INMSG) feels complete discussion of IONM in the preoperative planning and patient consent process is important in all patients undergoing thyroid and parathyroid surgery. The purpose of this publication is to evaluate the impact of IONM on the informed consent process before thyroid and parathyroid surgery and to review the current INMSG consensus on evidence-based consent. The objective of this consensus statement, which outlines general and specific considerations as well as recommended criteria for informed consent for the use of IONM, is to assist surgeons and patients in the processes of informed consent and shared decision making before thyroid and parathyroid surgery.


Subject(s)
Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Informed Consent/standards , Internationality , Monitoring, Intraoperative/standards , Parathyroidectomy/standards , Thyroidectomy/standards , Humans , Monitoring, Intraoperative/adverse effects , Parathyroid Glands/surgery , Parathyroidectomy/adverse effects , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Thyroid Gland/surgery , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects
17.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 96(12): 3158-3177, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34736777

ABSTRACT

Perioperative medication management is integral to preoperative optimization but remains challenging because of a paucity of literature guidance. Published recommendations are based on the expert opinion of a small number of authors without collaboration from multiple specialties. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) recognized the need for consensus recommendations in this area as well as the unique opportunity for its multidisciplinary membership to fill this void. In a series of articles within this journal, SPAQI provides preoperative medication management guidance based on available literature and expert multidisciplinary consensus. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide practical guidance on the preoperative management of gastrointestinal and pulmonary medications. A panel of experts with anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, hospital medicine, general internal medicine, and medical specialty experience was drawn together and identified the common medications in each of these categories. The authors then used a modified Delphi approach to review the literature and to generate consensus recommendations.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/standards , Quality Improvement , Respiratory System Agents/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Perioperative Care/methods , Perioperative Care/standards , Preoperative Care/methods , Quality Improvement/standards , Respiratory System Agents/adverse effects
18.
BMC Urol ; 21(1): 150, 2021 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34742277

ABSTRACT

This Commentary is in response to the BMC Urology publication entitled "Infection-related hospitalization following ureteroscopic stone treatment: Results from a surgical collaborative". This study utilized a registry with prospectively recorded standardized data elements named Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones, part of the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, to identify risk factors of infection-related hospitalization after ureteroscopy for stone treatment. The study included 1817 primary URS procedures for urinary stones in 11 practices in Michigan. They found 43 patients (2.4%) were hospitalized with an infection-related complication and 3 patients died during their hospitalization (0.2% mortality rate). Just over 20% of patients did not have a pre-operative urinalysis or urine culture, representing a deviation from guideline recommendations. Also, in the hospitalized group, none of the 12 patients (27.9%) who had a positive pre-operative urinalysis or urine culture received pre-operative treatment. A multivariable analysis identified higher Charleston Comorbidity Index, history of recurrent urinary tract infection, increasing stone size, intraoperative complications, and fragments left in-situ as independent risk factors for hospitalization from an infection after ureteroscopy. This commentary discusses caveats to the data as well as short-comings of the study. It also reviews more broadly infection after ureteroscopy, includes findings from similar studies, and highlights guideline recommendations to reduce infection risk.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Kidney Calculi/urine , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preoperative Care/standards , Research Design , Risk Factors , Standard of Care
19.
Can J Surg ; 64(5): E491-E509, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34598927

ABSTRACT

Preoperative optimization has not been explored comprehensively in the surgical literature, as this responsibility has often been divided among surgery, anesthesia and medicine. We developed an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to summarize existing evidence and present diagnostic and treatment algorithms for use by surgeons caring for patients scheduled to undergo major elective surgery. We focus on 3 common comorbid conditions seen across surgical specialties - anemia, hyperglycemia and smoking - as these conditions increase complication rates in patients undergoing major surgery and can be optimized successfully as soon as 6-8 weeks before surgery. With the ability to address these conditions earlier in the patient journey, surgeons can positively affect patient outcomes. The aim of this guideline is to bring optimization in the preoperative period under the existing umbrella of evidence-based surgical care.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Anemia/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Hyperglycemia/therapy , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Preoperative Care/standards , Smoking/therapy , Anemia/diagnosis , Humans , Hyperglycemia/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...