Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.347
Filter
1.
JBJS Case Connect ; 14(2)2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758928

ABSTRACT

CASE: A 17-year-old adolescent boy with Gross Motor Function Classification System 5 cerebral palsy and neuromuscular scoliosis underwent posterior spinal fusion and segmental spinal instrumentation from T3 to the pelvis. He developed a right ischial pressure injury a few months postoperatively, which persisted despite nonoperative measures. He subsequently underwent an ipsilateral transiliac-shortening osteotomy 16 months after spinal surgery to treat his residual pelvic obliquity and the ischial pressure injury, which healed completely. At the 1-year follow-up visit, there were no further signs of pressure injury. CONCLUSION: This case report describes transiliac-shortening osteotomy as a viable treatment option for non-healing ischial pressure injuries secondary to fixed pelvic obliquity.


Subject(s)
Ischium , Osteotomy , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Osteotomy/methods , Ischium/injuries , Ischium/surgery , Pressure Ulcer/surgery , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Spinal Fusion/methods , Cerebral Palsy/surgery , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Scoliosis/surgery , Ilium/surgery
2.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 37(6): 329-335, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767425

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Urinary catheter-related meatal pressure injury (UCR-MPI) is a preventable and serious complication of indwelling urinary catheter use. This prospective study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of UCR-MPI in male critical care patients. METHODS: A total of 138 male patients 18 years and older using an indwelling urinary catheter were included in the study. Participants' perineal areas were assessed daily for the development of MPI. RESULTS: The UCR-MPI prevalence was 26.1% (n = 36/138). Most patients (61.1%) had a grade I UCR-MPI with intact skin and mucosa and nonblanchable erythema. Urinary catheter irrigation (P = .001), lower Braden Scale scores (P = .040), lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = .002), higher Itaki Fall Risk Scale score (P = .040), higher dependency level (P = .027), hypoalbuminemia (P = .002), and perineal edema (P = .001) were risk factors for UCR-MPI. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of UCR-MPI was high in this sample. Providers should take preventive measures to prevent UCR-MPI in patients with a penis including early and frequent risk assessment.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Urinary Catheterization , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Aged , Adult , Critical Care/methods , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Prevalence , Risk Assessment/methods
3.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 982024 Apr 23.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666583

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The administration of oxygen therapy (O2) in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) increases the risk of developing pressure injuries (PBI). The aims of the study were to describe the incidence of PBI associated with O2 devices in the NICU, to identify, analyze and relate risk factors and the application of their preventive measures. METHODS: A retrospective, observational and analytical study of hospitalized neonates who developed PPL secondary to O2 devices in the NICU of the Miguel Servet University Hospital of Zaragoza was carried out. Socio-demographical, clinical, type of cot, humidity, temperature, type of oxygen therapy, ventilation mode, device and presence of ulcer (number, degree, location), and preventive measures were recorded. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Autonomous Community of Aragon. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi 2.3.13®. RESULTS: A total of 191 neonates were included, of whom 158 (82.7%) received O2. Of those who received oxygen therapy, 64.10% (25) were infants, mean total age 5.20±8.46 days and mean weight 1,460.03±777.57 grams. 24.68% presented with device-associated PPL, with a mean number of days of admission at the time of onset of 3.98±5.03 days. 94.74% (36) of the lesions were grade I and 84.62% (33) were located in the nasal septum. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pressure injuries associated with different oxygen therapy devices increases with decreasing gestational age. The risk increases with hospital stay, with the presence of medical devices, in particular non-invasive mechanical ventilation, being the main causal relationship.


OBJETIVO: La administración de oxigenoterapia en las unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales (UCIN) supone un aumento del riesgo de desarrollar lesiones por presión (LPP). Los objetivos de este trabajo fueron describir la incidencia de LPP asociadas a dispositivos de oxigenoterapia, así como identificar, analizar y relacionar los factores de riesgo y sus medidas preventivas. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, observacional y analítico de neonatos hospitalizados que desarrollaran una LPP secundaria a dispositivos de O2 en la UCIN del Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet de Zaragoza. Las variables registradas fueron las sociodemográficas, las clínicas, el tipo de cuna, la humedad, la temperatura, el tipo de oxigenoterapia, el tipo de ventilación, el dispositivo utilizado, la presencia de úlcera (número, grado, localización) y las medidas preventivas aplicadas. El estudio fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética de la Investigación de la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón. El análisis estadístico se realizó mediante Jamovi 2.3.13®. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 191 neonatos, de los cuales 158 (82,7%) recibieron oxigenoterapia. El 64,10% de ellos fueron niños, la media de edad fue de 5,20±8,46 días y la de peso de 1.460,0±777,57 gramos. El 24,68% presentaron LPP asociada a dispositivo, con una media de días de ingreso en el momento de la aparición de 3,98±5,03 días. El 94,74% de las lesiones fueron de grado I y el 84,62% se localizaron en tabique nasal. CONCLUSIONES: La incidencia de LPP asociada a los diferentes dispositivos de oxigenoterapia aumenta a medida que disminuye la edad gestacional. El riesgo aumenta con la estancia hospitalaria, siendo la presencia de dispositivos médicos, en particular la ventilación mecánica no invasiva, la principal causa.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/therapy , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/adverse effects , Incidence , Male , Female , Risk Factors
4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9748, 2024 04 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679609

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of shear stress on surgery-related sacral pressure injury (PI) after laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed in the lithotomy position. We included 37 patients who underwent this procedure between November 2021 and October 2022. The primary outcome was average horizontal shear stress caused by the rotation of the operating table during the operation, and the secondary outcome was interface pressure over time. Sensors were used to measure shear stress and interface pressure in the sacral region. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of PI. PI had an incidence of 32.4%, and the primary outcome, average horizontal shear stress, was significantly higher in the PI group than in the no-PI group. The interface pressure increased over time in both groups. At 120 min, the interface pressure was two times higher in the PI group than in the no-PI group (PI group, 221.5 mmHg; no-PI group, 86.0 mmHg; p < 0.01). This study suggested that shear stress resulting from rotation of the operating table in the sacral region by laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed in the lithotomy position is the cause of PI. These results should contribute to the prevention of PI.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Pressure Ulcer/surgery , Stress, Mechanical , Rotation , Pressure , Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Sacrum/surgery , Operating Tables
5.
J Wound Care ; 33(Sup5): S10-S13, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683815

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case report is to investigate an uncommon presentation of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes (RDD) disease, and discuss possible differential diagnoses and treatment options for this pathology. RDD is a rare disorder of histiocytes that typically presents in patients as painless cervical lymphadenopathy. However, this case involves a patient with the central nervous system (CNS) type of RDD who later developed cutaneous lesions. METHOD: Several differential diagnoses were examined, including hidradenitis suppurativa, pilonidal cyst and pressure ulcers. It is important to be able to exclude these diagnoses based on the presentation, patient demographic and wound location. RESULTS: Biopsies verified the presence of RDD in the patient's suprasellar hypothalamic mass and skin lesions, confirming the patient had both CNS-RDD and cutaneous-RDD in the absence of lymphadenopathy. CONCLUSION: Recognising the unique manifestations of rare diseases such as RDD prevents delay of proper intervention and treatment.


Subject(s)
Histiocytosis, Sinus , Humans , Histiocytosis, Sinus/diagnosis , Histiocytosis, Sinus/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Male , Middle Aged , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Pressure Ulcer/pathology , Female , Adult
6.
NeuroRehabilitation ; 54(3): 457-472, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most studies focus on the risk factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers (PUs) during acute phase or community care for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to i) compare clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients after SCI with PUs acquired during rehabilitation vs inpatients without PUs and ii) evaluate an existing PU risk assessment tool iii) identify first PU predictors. METHODS: Individuals (n = 1,135) admitted between 2008 and 2022 to a rehabilitation institution within 60 days after SCI were included. Admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) and mEntal state, Mobility, Incontinence, Nutrition, Activity (EMINA) were assessed. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were fitted. RESULTS: Overall incidence of PUs was 8.9%. Of these, 40.6% occurred in the first 30 days, 47.5% were sacral, 66.3% were Stage II. Patients with PUs were older, mostly with traumatic injuries (67.3%), AIS A (54.5%), lower FIM motor (mFIM) score and mechanical ventilation. We identified specific mFIM items to increase EMINA specificity. Adjusted Cox model yielded sex (male), age at injury, AIS grade, mFIM and diabetes as PUs predictors (C-Index = 0.749). CONCLUSION: Inpatients can benefit from combined assessments (EMINA + mFIM) and clinical features scarcely addressed in previous studies to prevent PUs.


Subject(s)
Inpatients , Pressure Ulcer , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Risk Factors , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
7.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 37(5): 238-242, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648236

ABSTRACT

GENERAL PURPOSE: To present research investigating the incidence of and risk factors associated with intraoperative pressure injury in patients undergoing neurologic surgery at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University in China. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Identify the incidence of intraoperative pressure injuries (PIs) in patients undergoing neurologic surgery at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University in China.2. Describe risk factors for intraoperative PI.3. Outline strategies to help mitigate intraoperative PI risk.


Intraoperative pressure injury (PI) development is an adverse event that impacts thousands of patients globally and is associated with extended hospital stays and increased risk of mortality. To investigate the incidence of intraoperative PI in patients undergoing neurologic surgery and identify associated risk factors. A total of 1,728 patients who underwent neurosurgery in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between January 2021 and December 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The authors collected patients' demographic data and clinical characteristics and used univariate and multivariate regression to evaluate significant PI risk factors. Intraoperative PI was observed in 1.8% of all surgical cases (n = 31). Having a body mass index greater than 24 kg/m2 (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.62­9.23; P = .002), being in a lateral position (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.04­6.17; P = .042) or a prone position (odds ratio, 10.43; 95% CI, 3.37­32.23; P < .001), and having a longer operation time (cutoff point at 7.92 hours for increased risk of PI; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.21­1.53; P < .001) were significant risk factors for intraoperative PI. This study identified three independent risk factors for intraoperative PI development: body position, surgery duration, and high body mass index. These findings can help OR nurses identify patients who are vulnerable to intraoperative PI and provide appropriate preventive measures. For these patients, perioperative protection and frequent microrepositioning during surgery would be indispensable.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Risk Factors , Adult , China/epidemiology , Male , Female , Incidence , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods
9.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 38(3): 141-146, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625804

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the reliability and predictive validity of Norton and Braden scales in determining the risk of pressure injury in elderly patients. DESIGN: This research used a comparative design. One hundred thirty elderly patients participated in the study. METHODS: The daily pressure injury risk of participants was evaluated by a researcher using both the Norton and Braden scales in a consecutive manner. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 75.1 ± 8.5 years, and that for those without and with pressure injury development was 75.0 ± 8.3 years and 76.1 ± 9.7 years (P < .001), respectively. The reliability coefficients of the Norton and Braden scales were .82 and .89, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Norton Scale were 100%, 40.7%, 20.2%, and 100%, and those of the Braden Scale were 100%, 32.7%, 18.3%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of both scales for elderly patients was found to be high, and their ability to differentiate patients at risk was comparable. However, both scales had low specificity. Further research is needed to develop scales that have higher predictive validity for the elderly population, taking into account other risk factors that influence total scale scores.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Risk Assessment , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Predictive Value of Tests
10.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14879, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581264

ABSTRACT

Pressure injuries are a significant concern for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures due to prolonged immobility and the complexity of care. This study evaluates the efficacy of standardized pressure ulcer management protocols in preventing pressure injuries and enhancing patient care in a neurosurgical context. A comprehensive retrospective analysis was conducted at a single institution from December 2020 to December 2023, comparing 50 patients who received standardized pressure ulcer management (intervention group) with 50 patients who received conventional care (control group). The study assessed the incidence of pressure ulcers, patient comfort levels using the Kolcaba Comfort Scale and sleep quality using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 27.0, applying t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. The intervention group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of pressure ulcers at all measured time points post-surgery compared to the control group. Patient comfort levels in the intervention group were consistently higher across psychological, environmental, physiological and socio-cultural domains. Sleep quality metrics, including sleep depth, latency to sleep onset and overall sleep quality, were significantly improved in the intervention group. The implementation of standardized pressure ulcer management protocols in neurosurgical care significantly reduces the incidence of pressure injuries, enhances patient comfort and improves sleep quality. These findings highlight the importance of adopting structured care protocols to improve postoperative outcomes and patient well-being in neurosurgical settings.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Intensive Care Units , Research Design , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects
11.
Wound Manag Prev ; 70(1)2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608164

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries result from prolonged pressure and lead to tissue damage, infections, extended recovery times, and an economic burden. PURPOSE: To explore risk factors for pressure injuries in patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery at a regional educational hospital in southern Taiwan from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. RESULTS: A comprehensive multivariate analysis was used to identify the prominent risk factors for pressure injury among the 11 231 patients enrolled in this study. These risk factors were an age of ≥65 years; surgery duration of >120 minutes; diastolic blood pressure of <60 mm Hg for >30 minutes during surgery; intraoperative use of dopamine, norepinephrine, or epinephrine as vasopressors; American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification of III or higher; minimum intraoperative body temperature of ≤35°C; blood loss of >500 mL; and a supine or prone surgical position. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several pressure injury risk factors related to surgical conditions and patient characteristics. Surgical teams must monitor, control, and manage these factors, prioritize staff education, and adopt preventive protocols.


Subject(s)
Crush Injuries , Multiple Trauma , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Aged , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Body Temperature , Hospitals, Teaching
12.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14809, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613408

ABSTRACT

Surgery is a high risk factor for the occurrence of pressure injury (PI). On the basis of theoretical research, pressure and duration of pressure are key factors affecting PI. Pressure is affected by the individual pressure redistribution capacity. So our study aims to explore how the surgery time and pressure intensity affect the occurrence of PI and what are the risk factors. A prospective study. A total of 250 patients who underwent elective surgery in a grade-A general hospital from November 2021 to February 2023 were selected and divided into a group of 77 patients with IAPI (intraoperatively acquired pressure injury) and a group of 173 patients with no IAPI. Visual pressure inductive feedback system and body composition analysis technology were used to record the local pressure value and change of patients before and after anaesthesia. Relevant data of the patients were collected to explore the influencing factors. The maximum pressure and average pressure at the pressure site of the same patient changed before and after anaesthesia, and the pressure after anaesthesia was significantly higher than that before anaesthesia. There was no statistical difference in the average pressure after anaesthesia (p > 0.05), but the maximum pressure in the IAPI group was higher than that in the non-occurrence group (p < 0.05). The average pressure multiplied by the operation time in IAPI group is significantly higher than that in the non-IAPI group (p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis (stepwise regression) showed that fat-free weight, age, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI) and gender were taken as independent variables into the regression model, affecting the maximum pressure. In addition, operation time ≥4 h may be a high risk factor for IAPI. In future studies, more objective research tools can be applied to improve the accuracy of predicting the risk of IAPI. In addition to gender and BMI, follow-up studies may consider including measures such as waist circumference and fat-free body weight in IAPI risk assessment to guide the clinical nursing work more scientifically.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Prospective Studies , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Body Mass Index , Hospitals, General
13.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14855, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38562093

ABSTRACT

To explore the role of nutritional support in nursing practice on postoperative surgical site wound healing in patients undergoing surgery at risk for pressure ulcers. This study adopted a retrospective experimental design and included a total of 60 patients at risk of pressure ulcers, divided into a nutritional support group and a control group, with 30 people in each group. The nutritional support group implemented specific nutritional support measures after surgery, while the control group received standard postoperative care. Outcome measures included redness and swelling scores, edema scores, anxiety assessments, pain scores, bleeding volume, recovery time and incidence of pressure ulcers. The result indicates that patients who received nutritional support exhibited lower postoperative wound redness and swelling scores compared to the control group (3.11 ± 0.45 vs. 4.85 ± 0.74, p < 0.05). Additionally, the nutritional support group showed significantly lower edema scores (2.75 ± 0.37 vs. 3.53 ± 0.62, p < 0.05). Anxiety levels, as measured by the anxiety assessment scale (SAS), were also lower in the nutritional support group (6.52 ± 1.19 vs. 7.60 ± 1.62, p < 0.05). Moreover, the average healing time was shorter for the nutritional support group (7.27 ± 1.36 days) compared to the control group (9.71 ± 1.84 days, p < 0.05). Postoperative pain scores were lower in the nutritional support group (4.13 ± 0.72 vs. 5.43 ± 0.62, p < 0.05), and patient satisfaction scores were higher (9.42 ± 0.76 vs. 7.25 ± 0.81, p < 0.05). Nutritional support has a positive effect on postoperative wound healing at surgical sites in patients at risk of pressure ulcers in nursing practice. It can significantly reduce redness, swelling, edema, anxiety, and pain scores, reduce bleeding, shorten recovery time, and reduce pressure ulcers. incidence rate.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Nutritional Support , Wound Healing , Pain , Edema
14.
Int Wound J ; 21(3): e14829, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38494175

ABSTRACT

This review aims to systematically evaluate the association between hypertension and pressure ulcer (PU). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies from their inception until September 12, 2023. Literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently by two researchers. The random-effects model was used to calculate the combined odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of hypertension in patients with PU; subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of between-study heterogeneity; sensitivity analysis was used to test the robust of the combined result; and funnel plot and Egger's test were used to assess the publication bias. Finally, a total of 19 studies with 564 716 subjects were included; the overall pooled result showed no significant association between hypertension and risk of developing PU (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.90-1.47, p = 0.27); and the sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis showed robust of the combined result. Subgroup analysis indicated a significant association between hypertension and PU when the primary disease was COVID-19 (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.35-2.22, p < 0.0001). No association between hypertension and PU was seen in subgroup analysis on the patient source and study design. In sum, there is no significantly statistical association between hypertension and the occurrence of PU in most cases, while the risk of PU significantly elevates among COVID-19 patients combined with hypertension regardless of patient source and study design.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Research Design
15.
Int Wound J ; 21(3): e14690, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453139

ABSTRACT

The study explores the impact of predictive nursing interventions on pressure ulcers (PUs) in elderly bedridden patients. A total of 120 elderly bedridden patients from the Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture between August 2019 and August 2023 were selected as the subjects of the study and were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group using a random number table method. The control group received conventional nursing care, while the observation group received predictive nursing interventions. The study compared the incidence of PUs, Braden scale scores, the onset time of PUs, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores, self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores, and nursing satisfaction between the two groups. In elderly bedridden patients, the application of predictive nursing interventions significantly reduced the incidence of PUs (p < 0.001), significantly lowered the SAS and SDS scores (p < 0.001), and also significantly increased Braden scale scores (p < 0.001) and delayed the onset time of PUs (p < 0.001). Additionally, it improved patients' nursing satisfaction (p = 0.008). Predictive nursing interventions in elderly bedridden patients have good application effects, reducing the occurrence of PUs, delaying the time of onset in patients, improving patients' negative emotions and enhancing nursing satisfaction rates. It is worthy of widespread use.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Aged , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Bedridden Persons , Patients , Incidence , Suppuration/complications
16.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 92: 207-211, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38552404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The sudden increase of intensive care unit patients during the coronavirus pandemic led to an increase in the incidence of sacral pressure lesions. Despite being ambulating patients, in many cases the lesions were deep (Grade III and IV), mainly due to the long-term intubation and being bedridden during the pandemic. Most of these wounds necessitated surgical repair. OBJECTIVES: To measure the success and the rate of complications in reconstructions of grade III and IV hospital acquired sacral pressure lesions in ambulating patients after hospitalization for COVID-19. Developing a well-established protocol for surgical treatment of hospital acquired sacral pressure lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Prospective cohort involving ambulating patients with grades III and IV sacral pressure lesions developed after hospitalization for COVID-19 from May 2020 to August 2020 (4 months). All of them were submitted to reconstruction with fasciocutaneous flaps. Demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative laboratory tests were compared and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was made in order to identify risk factors for complications. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were submitted to fasciocutaneous flaps to repair sacral pressure lesions with a total complication rate of 36.0%. Hemoglobin levels lower than 9.0 mg/dl (p = 0,01), leukocyte levels higher than 11.000/mm3 (p = 0,1), and C Reactive protein levels higher than 142 mg/dl (p = 0,06) at the time of reconstruction and bilateral flaps were independent factors for complications. CONCLUSION: Specific preoperative laboratory tests and surgical techniques were associated with a statistically significant increased complication risk. It was established a protocol for surgical treatment of hospital-acquired sacral pressure lesions to diminish these risks, focusing on ambulating patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/surgery , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Clinical Protocols , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgical Flaps , Sacrococcygeal Region/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Sacrum/surgery , Adult
17.
J Tissue Viability ; 33(2): 275-283, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment and care of patients in intensive care units require the use of many medical and technological instruments. Pressure injuries occur when medical devices, which are used more in intensive care patients and are in direct or indirect contact with the skin, cause focal and localized forces on the superficial or deep tissues. OBJECTIVE: In this study, it was aimed to examine the risk factors, incidence and characteristics of medical device-related pressure injuries in intensive care patients. METHODS: This study has a prospective and descriptive design. The study was carried out in the adult intensive care unit of a healthcare institution located in the western Turkey. 138 intensive care patients treated in the level 3 adult intensive care unit were enrolled in the study. The first observations and evaluations of intensive care patients in terms of pressure injuries were made within the first 24 h after admission to the clinic. Observations continued daily during the hospitalization period of the patient. Data were collected with the Intensive Care Patient Information Form, Glasgow Coma Scale, Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale and Identification Form for Medical device-related Pressure Ulcers. Analysis of data was performed with descriptive statistical methods, Shapiro-Wilk Test, Mann-Whitney U Test and Chi-Square analysis. RESULTS: Medical device-related pressure injury developed in 11.6% (n = 16) of intensive care patients. Anatomically, pressure injury occurred most frequently on the lip (37.5%) and most frequently due to the intubation tube (37.5%). Most of the developed wounds (75.0%) were found to be stage 2. Multinominal logistic regression analysis, which was performed to determine the effect of independent variables on medical device-related pressure injuries in intensive care patients, was found to be statistically significant (X2 = 37.098, p < 0.001). When the regression coefficients were examined, it was found that total hospitalization time in the intensive care unit (ß = 0.948, p < 0.01) and PaCO2 level (ß = 0.923, p < 0.01) had a positive, and duration of aerobic respiration with nasal cannula or mask (ß = -0.920, p < 0.01) and Braden score (ß = -0.948, p < 0.01) had a negative and significant effect on medical device-related pressure injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In this study found that the MDRPIs development rate was lower than other studies. It was observed that pressure injuries due to medical devices developed more frequently in patients with longer hospitalization days, higher PaCO2 levels, shorter duration of oxygenated breathing with nasal cannula or mask, and lower Braden scores.


Subject(s)
Equipment and Supplies , Intensive Care Units , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Turkey/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Equipment and Supplies/adverse effects , Equipment and Supplies/standards , Equipment and Supplies/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Incidence , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over
18.
J Tissue Viability ; 33(2): 248-253, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493047

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study was carried out to determine the prevalence of pressure injury and risk factors in patients hospitalized in a university hospital's level 3 intensive care unit. DESIGN: It is a descriptive, prospective, observational type study. METHOD: The sample of the study consisted of 176 patients aged 18 and over who were admitted to the intensive care units of a University Hospital for at least 24 h. Patient Information Form and Braden Risk Assessment Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale were used to collect data. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 program was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Presence of chronic disease in the development of pressure injury (22.7%), high-risk patients according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (21%), high-risk patients according to the Braden Risk Assessment Scale (84.2%), low hemoglobin (31%), low albumin levels (32.4%) and duration of stay in the intensive care unit until the day of evaluation were found to be independent risk factors (p < 0.05). The prevalence of pressure injury was determined to be 32.4%, and the rate of pressure injury due to medical devices was 7.4%. CONCLUSION: Pressure injuries are still common in adult intensive care patients. In terms of patient safety, it is important to give more space to care standards and awareness-raising research and training to prevent pressure injuries.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Risk Factors , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Aged , Prevalence , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/standards , Adolescent , Glasgow Coma Scale/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over
19.
J Tissue Viability ; 33(2): 179-184, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553354

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs) are one of the leading potentially preventable hospital-acquired complications associated with prolonged hospital length, poor quality of life and financial burden. The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and PIs occurrence is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to further examine relationships between BMI and PIs occurrence in hospitalized patients. DESIGN: A multi-center prospective study. SETTING: 39 hospitals located in northwest China from April 2021 to July 2023. PARTICIPANTS: 175,960 hospitalized patients aged over 18 years were enrolled, and 170,800 patients were included in the final analysis. METHODS: BMI and clinical characteristics were assessed at baseline. PIs assessment were performed by trained nurses, with data recorded for the presence, the location and stage of each PI. For staging PIs, the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel(NPUAP) staging system were used. The multivariate logistic regressions analysis and restricted cubic splines (RCS) models were used to explore associations between BMI and PIs, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 175,960 participants, 5160 were excluded from analyses. The multivariate logistic regression model identified a positive relationship between under-weight BMI and risk of PIs occurrence (OR = 1.60, 95% CI:1.18-2.17). We also found U shaped association between BMI and PIs occurrence (non-linear P < 0.001). BMI less than 23 kg/m2 significantly increased risk of PIs, and there was a tendency to increase risk of PIs at BMI higher than 30 kg/m2. We stratified participants by sex to further investigate their association and found the risk of PIs increases substantially in women at BMI below 17 kg/m2 and in men at BMI below 23 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that there was an approximate U shaped relationship between BMI and PIs occurrence, and this association was potentially different between men and women.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , China/epidemiology , Aged , Adult , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Logistic Models
20.
J Tissue Viability ; 33(2): 243-247, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458956

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the prevalence, risk, and determinants of pressure ulcer risk in a large cohort of hospitalized patients. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional study with data collection in January 2023. METHODS: Registered nurses collected data from 798 patients admitted to 27 health care units of an Italian hospital. The pressure ulcer risk was assessed using the Braden scale. The presence of comorbidities was collected from clinical reports. Obesity was assessed according to international indicators (Body Mass Index). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of different Braden scores for identifying participants with pressure ulcers. RESULTS: The prevalence of pressure ulcers was 9.5%, and 57.4% of the sample were at risk of developing pressure ulcers. The area under the ROC curve was 0.88. The best sensitivity and specificity were found for a Braden cutoff score of 15.5 (sensibility = 0.76; specificity = 0.85). The determinants of lower Braden scores were older age (p < 0.001), comorbidities (p < 0.001), wounds of other nature (p = 0.001), urinary incontinence (p < 0.001), fecal incontinence (p < 0.001), and urinary catheterization (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several demographic factors and specific clinical indicators have been identified as determinants of the risk of developing pressure ulcers, which are easily ascertainable by healthcare providers; thus, they may routinely complement the Braden Scale in the assessment of pressure ulcer risk in order to reinforce and accelerate clinical judgment.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Male , Italy/epidemiology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/standards , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Risk Factors , Prevalence , Adult , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , ROC Curve
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...