Early Allograft Dysfunction Increases Hospital Associated Costs After Liver Transplantation-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Concepts to ameliorate the continued mismatch between demand for liver allografts and supply include the acceptance of allografts that meet extended donor criteria (ECD). ECD grafts are generally associated with an increased rate of complications such as early allograft dysfunction (EAD). The costs of liver transplantation for the health care system with respect to specific risk factors remain unclear and are subject to change. We analyzed 317 liver transplant recipients from 2013 to 2018 for outcome after liver transplantation and hospital costs in a German transplant center. In our study period, 1-year survival after transplantation was 80.1% (95% confidence interval: 75.8%-84.6%) and median hospital stay was 33 days (interquartile rage: 24), with mean hospital costs of €115,924 (SD €113,347). There was a positive correlation between costs and laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (rs = 0.48, P < 0.001), and the development of EAD increased hospital costs by €26,229. ECD grafts were not associated with a higher risk of EAD in our cohort. When adjusting for recipient-associated risk factors such as laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, recipient age, and split liver transplantation with propensity score matching, only EAD and cold ischemia increased total costs. Conclusion: Our data show that EAD leads to significantly higher hospital costs for liver transplantation, which are primarily attributed to recipient health status. Strategies to reduce the incidence of EAD are needed to control costs in liver transplantation.

Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: Outcomes and resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: A unified definition of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after heart transplantation was adopted in 2014, with moderate and severe PGD defined as a need for mechanical circulatory support. While risk factors for PGD are well identified, outcomes and resource utilization have not been well-studied. We examined the resource utilization and associated costs with PGD. METHODS: All adult heart transplantations (2001-2016) from a statewide Society of Thoracic Surgery database were analyzed by dividing them into two groups-with PGD (requiring mechanical circulatory support) and without PGD. RESULTS: Of the 718 heart transplants, 110 (15.3%) patients developed PGD. Prevalence of PGD for the study duration ranged from 3.7% to 22.7% with no significant trend. The most frequently used mechanical circulatory support device was intra-aortic balloon pump (88%), followed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (17%), and catheter-based circulatory support devices (3%). There were no significant differences in demographics or preoperative variables between the two groups. Resource utilization such as total intensive care unit hours, ventilation hours, reoperation for bleeding, blood product transfusions, and length of stay were significantly higher in the PGD group. Postoperative complications were also higher in PGD group including operative mortality (31.8% vs 3.8%, P < .0001). The median cost of heart transplantation was significantly higher in the PGD group $229 482 ($126 044-$388 889) vs $101 788 ($72 638-$181 180) P < .0001. CONCLUSION: Primary graft dysfunction following heart transplantation developed in 15% of patients. Patients with PGD had significantly higher complications, resource utilization, and mortality. Preventive measures to address the development of PGD would reduce resource utilization and improve outcomes.

PREventing Delayed Graft Function by Driving Immunosuppressive InduCtion Treatment (PREDICT-DGF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation, the use of Anti-Thymocyte Globulins (ATG) as induction therapy has been described as a possible treatment for reducing the prevalence of Delayed Graft Function (DGF). ATG possesses pharmaceutical proprieties that could help control the lesions caused by ischemia reperfusion injury. However, other studies have questioned this potential protective effect. We hypothesized that the benefits related to ATG for reducing DGF prevalence may be higher and more consistently recognized if only patients with high DGF risk are considered. We recently proposed a scoring system entitled DGFS (Delayed Graft Function Score) for such stratification of kidney transplant recipients according to their risk of DGF. Using the DGFS calculation, we aim to determine whether a short course of ATG can decrease the incidence of DGF in comparison with Basiliximab in kidney transplant recipients with low immunological risk but high DGF risk. METHODS: We conduct a phase IV, open label, randomized, multicentric and prospective study, to compare ATG in parallel with a control group treated by Basiliximab. The 1:1 randomized allocation of patients between groups is stratified on the clinical center, and on the hypothermic machine-perfusion device. We aimed to include a total of 384 patients to achieve a statistical power at 0.80. The study was initiated at the Nantes University hospital in July 2014, with data collection continuing until April 2018, and publication of the results proposed for 2019. DISCUSSION: The main expected benefits of this study are i) the reduction of unjustified ATG over-prescriptions associated with serious adverse events, ii) the reduction of chance losses related to ATG under-prescription, iii) the decrease in the incidence of DGF which was described as a risk factor of graft failure and patient death, and iv) the reduction in hospitalization duration and number of post transplantation dialysis sessions, both being associated with reduced medical costs. In conclusion, the current study is innovative by proposing a more efficient and personalized induction therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry (# NCT02056938, February 5, 2014), and in the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT #2014-000332-42, January 30, 2014).