Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26
Filter
1.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 22(11): 2032-2040, 2020 10 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32531063

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The burden of disease attributable to tobacco use in Latin America is very high. Our objective was to evaluate the 10-year potential impact of current legislation related to cigarette packaging and warnings and expected effects of moving to a higher level of strategies implementing cigarette plain packaging on health and cost outcomes in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru, using a microsimulation model. AIMS AND METHODS: We used a probabilistic state-transition microsimulation model, considering natural history, costs, and quality of life losses associated with main tobacco-related diseases. We followed up individuals in hypothetical cohorts and calculated health outcomes annually to obtain aggregated long-term population health outcomes and costs. We performed a literature review to estimate effects and analyzed studies and information from ministries, relevant organizations, and national surveys. We calibrated the model comparing the predicted disease-specific mortality rates with local statistics. RESULTS: Current graphic warnings already in place in each country could avert, during 10 years, 69 369 deaths and 638 295 disease events, adding 1.2 million years of healthy life and saving USD 5.3 billion in the seven countries. If these countries implemented plain packaging strategies, additional 155 857 premature deaths and 4 133 858 events could be averted, adding 4.1 million healthy years of life and saving USD 13.6 billion in direct health care expenses of diseases attributable to smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Latin American countries should not delay the implementation of this strategy that will alleviate part of the enormous health and financial burden that tobacco poses on their economies and health care systems. IMPLICATIONS: Tobacco smoking is the single most preventable and premature mortality cause in the world. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, supported by the World Health Organization, introduced a package of evidence-based measures for tobacco control. This study adds evidence on the potential health effects and savings of implementing cigarette plain packaging in countries representing almost 80% of the Latin American population; findings are valuable resources for policy makers in the region.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Models, Economic , Product Labeling/standards , Product Packaging/standards , Quality of Life , Tobacco Products/economics , Tobacco Smoking/economics , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Latin America/epidemiology , Product Labeling/economics , Product Packaging/economics , Tobacco Smoking/epidemiology
2.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs ; 81(2): 238-248, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359055

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evidence-informed alcohol warning labels (AWLs) are a promising, well-targeted strategy to increase consumer awareness of health risks. We assessed consumers' baseline knowledge of alcohol-related cancer risk, standard drinks, and low-risk drinking guidelines as well as levels of support for AWLs. We further assessed associations with sociodemographic factors. METHOD: Forming part of a larger study testing new evidence-informed AWLs in a northern Canadian territory compared with a neighboring territory, baseline surveys were completed among liquor store patrons systematically selected in both sites. Chi-square and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 836 liquor store patrons (47.8% female) completed baseline surveys across both sites. Overall, there was low knowledge of alcohol-related cancer risk (24.5%), limited ability to calculate a standard drink (29.5%), and low knowledge of daily (49.5%) and weekly (48.2%) low-risk drinking guideline limits. There was moderate support for AWLs with a health warning (55.9%) and standard drink information (51.4%), and lower support for low-risk drinking guideline labels (38.7%). No sociodemographic characteristics were associated with cancer knowledge. Identifying as female and having adequate health literacy were associated with support for all three AWLs; high alcohol use was associated with not supporting standard drink (adjusted odds ratio = 0.60, 95% CI [0.40, 0.88]) and low-risk drinking guideline (adjusted odds ratio = 0.57, 95% CI [0.38, 0.87]) labels. CONCLUSIONS: Few consumers in this study had key alcohol-related health knowledge; however, there was moderate support for AWLs as a tool to raise awareness. Implementation of information-based interventions such as evidence-informed AWLs with health messages including alcohol-related cancer risk, standard drink information, and national drinking guidelines is warranted.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcoholic Beverages/adverse effects , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Product Labeling/standards , Socioeconomic Factors , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/economics , Alcoholic Beverages/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Northwest Territories/epidemiology , Product Labeling/economics , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Yukon Territory/epidemiology
4.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 21(7): 933-939, 2019 06 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29529277

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The US Tobacco Control Act restricts advertising or labeling that suggests one tobacco product is less harmful than another. We sought to examine how "organic," "natural," and "additive-free" advertising claims and corresponding disclaimers affect perceptions of cigarettes' harm. METHODS: Participants were a national probability sample of adults in the United States (n = 1114, including 344 smokers). We conducted a 5 (claim) × 2 (disclaimer) between-subjects factorial experiment. Participants viewed a Natural American Spirit cigarettes ad claiming they were "organic," "natural," "additive-free," "light," or "regular;" and with or without a corresponding disclaimer. The outcome was perceived harm of the advertised cigarettes. Among smokers, we also assessed interest in switching within their current brand to cigarettes with this characteristic (eg, "additive-free"). RESULTS: Claims in the ad had a large effect on perceived harm (Cohen's d = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.47 to 1.29). Claims of cigarettes being "organic," "natural," or "additive-free" reduced perceived harm from the advertised cigarettes, as compared with "regular" and "light" claims. Disclaimers had a small effect, increasing perceived harm (d = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.41). The problematic claims also increased smokers' interest in switching. Disclaimers had no effect on smokers' interest in switching. CONCLUSIONS: "Organic," "natural," and "additive-free" claims may mislead people into thinking that the advertised cigarettes are less harmful than other cigarettes. Disclaimers did not offset misperceptions of harm created by false claims. The US Food and Drug Administration should restrict the use of these misleading claims in tobacco advertising. IMPLICATIONS: "Organic," "natural," and "additive-free" cigarette advertising claims decrease perceptions of harm among the public and increase interest in switching to such cigarettes among smokers. Disclaimers do not counteract the reduced perceptions of harm or increased interest in switching to these cigarettes. The US Food and Drug Administration should restrict the use of "organic," "natural," and "additive-free" claims in tobacco marketing.


Subject(s)
Advertising/methods , Cigarette Smoking/psychology , Perception , Product Labeling/methods , Smokers/psychology , Tobacco Products/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Advertising/economics , Aged , Cigarette Smoking/economics , Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Product Labeling/economics , Tobacco Products/economics , Tobacco Products/standards , United States/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult
5.
Int J Dermatol ; 58(7): 788-794, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168846

ABSTRACT

The term "off-label drug use" involves the prescription of medications for unapproved indications or in unapproved dosage, dosage form, or route of administration. Off-label medications are common in the management of dermatologic diseases. In the recent years, new indications for botulinum toxin, biologics, spironolactone, topical calcineurin, and topical vitamin D analogues emerged, and these drugs are being used off-label to treat a variety of conditions. The high cost and long time required for the approval discourage pharmaceutical companies from developing studies and pursuing the approval by regulatory agencies. Patients and physicians may have a different perspective regarding the off-label use of medications. The ethical discussion is based on the different opinions concerning the need for informed consent by the patient and how this could be applicable in the clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Dermatology/ethics , Drug Industry/ethics , Off-Label Use/ethics , Patient Safety , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Dermatology/economics , Dermatology/methods , Drug Approval , Drug Industry/economics , Humans , Off-Label Use/economics , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/ethics , Skin Diseases/economics , Treatment Outcome
6.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 18(2): 221-6, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25744967

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Single cigarettes, which are sold without warning labels and often evade taxes, can serve as a gateway for youth smoking. The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 gives the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to regulate the manufacture, distribution, and marketing of tobacco products, including prohibiting the sale of single cigarettes. To enforce these regulations, the FDA conducted over 335,661 inspections between 2010 and September 30, 2014, and allocated over $115 million toward state inspections contracts. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in single cigarette violations across states and determine if likely correlates of single cigarette sales predict single cigarette violations at the state level. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of publicly available FDA warning letters from January 1 to July 31, 2014. SETTING: All 50 states and the District of Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: Tobacco retailer inspections conducted by FDA (n = 33 543). EXPOSURES FOR OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES: State cigarette tax, youth smoking prevalence, poverty, and tobacco production. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: State proportion of FDA warning letters issued for single cigarette violations. RESULTS: There are striking differences in the number of single cigarette violations found by state, with 38 states producing no warning letters for selling single cigarettes even as state policymakers developed legislation to address retailer sales of single cigarettes. The state proportion of warning letters issued for single cigarettes is not predicted by state cigarette tax, youth smoking, poverty, or tobacco production, P = .12. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Substantial, unexplained variation exists in violations of single cigarette sales among states. These data suggest the possibility of differences in implementation of FDA inspections and the need for stronger quality monitoring processes across states implementing FDA inspections.


Subject(s)
Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Products , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Advertising/economics , Commerce/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Marketing/economics , Marketing/legislation & jurisprudence , Product Labeling/economics , Smoking/epidemiology , Taxes/economics , Taxes/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/economics , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Products/economics , United States/epidemiology
7.
Tob Control ; 24(2): 112-9, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25550419

ABSTRACT

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 gave the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory authority over cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products and authorised it to assert jurisdiction over other tobacco products. As with other Federal agencies, FDA is required to assess the costs and benefits of its significant regulatory actions. To date, FDA has issued economic impact analyses of one proposed and one final rule requiring graphic warning labels (GWLs) on cigarette packaging and, most recently, of a proposed rule that would assert FDA's authority over tobacco products other than cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Given the controversy over the FDA's approach to assessing net economic benefits in its proposed and final rules on GWLs and the importance of having economic impact analyses prepared in accordance with sound economic analysis, a group of prominent economists met in early 2014 to review that approach and, where indicated, to offer suggestions for an improved analysis. We concluded that the analysis of the impact of GWLs on smoking substantially underestimated the benefits and overestimated the costs, leading the FDA to substantially underestimate the net benefits of the GWLs. We hope that the FDA will find our evaluation useful in subsequent analyses, not only of GWLs but also of other regulations regarding tobacco products. Most of what we discuss applies to all instances of evaluating the costs and benefits of tobacco product regulation and, we believe, should be considered in FDA's future analyses of proposed rules.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Government Regulation , Product Labeling , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Products/adverse effects , United States Food and Drug Administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis/standards , Drug Labeling , Humans , Pleasure , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Product Labeling/methods , United States
8.
BMJ Open ; 4(8): e005873, 2014 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25168041

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To test for early evidence whether, following the standardisation of tobacco packaging, smokers in Australia were--as predicted by the tobacco industry--less likely to purchase from small mixed business retailers, more likely to purchase cheap brands imported from Asia and more likely to use illicit tobacco. DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional population telephone surveys in November 2011 (a year prior to implementation), 2012 (during roll-out) and 2013 (a year after implementation). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Smokers aged 18 years and over identified in an annual population survey in the Australian state of Victoria (2011: n=754; 2012: n=590; 2013: n=601). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes between 2011 and 2013 in: proportions of current smokers who purchased their last cigarette from discount outlets such as supermarkets compared with small mixed business retail outlets; prevalence of regular use of low-cost brands imported from Asia and use of unbranded tobacco. RESULTS: The proportion of smokers purchasing from supermarkets did not increase between 2011 (65.4%) and 2013 (65.7%; p=0.98), and the percentage purchasing from small mixed business outlets did not decline (2011: 9.2%; 2012: 11.2%; p=0.32). The prevalence of low-cost Asian brands was low and did not increase between 2011 (1.1%) and 2013 (0.9%; p=0.98). The proportion reporting current use of unbranded illicit tobacco was 2.3% in 2011 and 1.9% in 2013 (p=0.46). In 2013, 2.6% of cigarette smokers reported having purchased one or more packets of cigarettes in non-compliant packaging in the past 3 months; 1.7% had purchased one or more packets from an informal seller in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: One year after implementation, this study found no evidence of the major unintended consequences concerning loss of smoker patrons from small retail outlets, flooding of the market by cheap Asian brands and use of illicit tobacco predicted by opponents of plain packaging in Australia.


Subject(s)
Commerce , Drug Packaging/economics , Product Labeling/economics , Smoking/economics , Tobacco Industry/economics , Tobacco Products/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Asia , Costs and Cost Analysis , Crime , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Drug Packaging/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Packaging/standards , Female , Humans , Intention , Male , Middle Aged , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Product Labeling/standards , Product Packaging , Reference Standards , Small Business/economics , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Victoria , Young Adult
9.
Support Care Cancer ; 22(12): 3153-63, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24912857

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in US cancer care declined amidst post-marketing evidence of adverse effects and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) addition of a "black-box" warning to product labeling in March 2007. Because reduced ESA use may have led to more transfusions or increased anemia-related health care needs, we measured the policy's impact on health care costs of lung and colon cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study of 13,630 lung and 3,198 colon cancer patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) between 2002 and 2008, we calculated anemia treatment (ESA and transfusion), cancer- and non-cancer-related, and total health care costs for the chemotherapy episode of care. We used multivariable regression to examine health care costs and utilization between patients whose chemotherapy was administered before (PRE) or after (POST) March 1, 2007. RESULTS: ESA costs declined and transfusion costs were similar, resulting in lower overall POST-period anemia treatment costs (lung, $526 lower, P < 0.01; colon, $504 lower, P < 0.01). Other cancer-related health care costs increased, resulting in markedly higher POST-period total health care costs (lung, $4,706 higher, P < 0.01; colon, $11,414 higher, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although chemotherapy episode anemia treatment costs declined after the black-box warning, the savings were offset by increases in other cancer-related costs. Those increases were mainly in outpatient services and pharmacy, suggesting that likely drivers include adoption of new high-cost diagnostic approaches and therapeutic modalities. Additional research is needed to determine the effects of anemia management changes on patient outcomes and to more fully understand cost-benefit relationships in cancer treatment.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hematinics , Adult , Aged , Anemia/drug therapy , Anemia/economics , Anemia/etiology , Blood Transfusion/economics , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/economics , Female , Hematinics/economics , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Policy Making , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/methods , Retrospective Studies , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
10.
Tob Control ; 23(1): 70-6, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23712769

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess change in cigarette pack retrieval time in small retail outlets following the introduction of plain packaging in Australia in 1 December 2012. METHODS: A sample of 303 milk bars, convenience stores, petrol stations and newsagents was selected in four capital cities, stratified by area socioeconomic status. In June and September (baseline months), the first 2 weeks of December 2012, and February 2013, stores were visited by trained fieldworkers who requested a cigarette pack of a pre-determined brand, variant and pack size, unobtrusively recording the time from the end of the request to when the pack was scanned or placed on the counter. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, December retrieval time (12.43 s) did not differ from June (10.91 s; p=0.410) or February (10.37 s; p=0.382), but was slower than September (9.84 s; p=0.024). In December, retrieval time declined as days after plain packaging implementation increased (ß=-0.21, p=0.011), returning to the baseline range by the second week of implementation. This pattern was not observed in baseline months or in February. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were robust to the variability in purchasing circumstances in tobacco retail outlets. CONCLUSIONS: Retailers quickly gained experience with the new plain packaging legislation, evidenced by retrieval time having returned to the baseline range by the second week of implementation and remaining so several months later. The long retrieval times predicted by tobacco industry-funded retailer groups and the consequent costs they predicted would fall upon small retailers from plain packaging are unlikely to eventuate.


Subject(s)
Commerce , Product Labeling , Public Policy , Smoking Cessation , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Industry , Tobacco Products , Adult , Australia , Commerce/economics , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Male , Marketing , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Product Packaging/economics , Product Packaging/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/economics , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Young Adult
11.
J Arthroplasty ; 29(1): 132-6, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23618749

ABSTRACT

Implant related errors and wasted arthroplasty implants represent a significant problem in the healthcare system. Studies estimate that an implant is wasted in two to five percent of total joint replacement procedures. After the introduction of a standardized time-out procedure, our institution still had a wasted implant in one out of every 20 arthroplasty surgeries. We then implemented a computer based, e.Label and compatibility system which standardized the implant labeling, confirmed correct size and side, and ensured compatibility within implant systems. Use of this system decreased wasted implants from 5.7% to 0.8% of total knee arthroplasty cases. This translated to an annualized cost savings of over $75,000 over our study period which could extrapolate to over $82 million per year in savings to the US healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Hospital Information Systems , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Knee Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Product Labeling , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data , Cost Control , Costs and Cost Analysis , Decision Making, Computer-Assisted , Efficiency, Organizational/economics , Humans , Knee Prosthesis/economics , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/methods , Prosthesis Design
12.
Health Econ ; 23(7): 776-91, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23765734

ABSTRACT

Labels such as 'Large' or 'Super-size' are often used to describe portion sizes. How do these normative labels influence consumer choice and how much they ultimately either consume or waste? Although one might believe that firms use normative labels to impact choice behavior through loss aversion, a field experiment shows consumer's willingness to pay is inconsistent with a loss aversion explanation. Although portions were clearly visible, individuals appeared to use the labels as objective information about their size. Importantly, a second study showed these labels also led people to eat less when food was given a larger sounding name than a smaller name (double vs. regular; regular vs. half-size). If labels are used as size information, policies governing normative names could help reduce food consumption or reduce waste.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Portion Size/economics , Product Labeling/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Energy Intake , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic
13.
Drug Alcohol Rev ; 32(1): 5-10, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22716074

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Since 2010, members of the World Trade Organization (WTO), including Australia, have opposed Thailand's proposal for graphic warnings on alcohol containers. This paper aims to provide an account of the arguments for/against Thailand and to examine the arguments' legal and political validity. DESIGN AND METHODS: This paper reviews primary WTO records in relation to Thailand's proposal to reveal the arguments for/against Thailand's proposal. The paper analyses these arguments in light of WTO cases to identify the legal strengths and weaknesses of Thailand's position. The paper then considers whether the attacks on Thailand by Australia are justified in light of the Australian Government's position on (i) alcohol warning labels in Australia and (ii) tobacco plain packaging. RESULTS: The legal arguments against Thailand are: only harmful alcohol consumption should be prevented; there is no evidence that graphic warning labels can reduce alcohol-related harm; the labels unnecessarily restrict international trade. There are some legal weaknesses in Thailand's proposal. Yet, Australia's opposition to Thailand cannot be justified whilst Australia is (i) mandating pregnancy-related alcohol warnings in Australia and (ii) defending its plain packaging law against similar WTO attacks. DISCUSSION: No WTO member is obliged to challenge another member for being non-compliant. The case tests the willingness of WTO members like Australia to respect the autonomy of other countries to pursue their public health goals and trial novel interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Australia's actions suggest it is willing to protect its alcohol industry at the expense of public health in Thailand.


Subject(s)
Alcoholic Beverages/standards , Product Labeling/standards , Public Health/standards , Alcohol Drinking/economics , Alcohol Drinking/legislation & jurisprudence , Alcoholic Beverages/economics , Australia , Commerce/economics , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce/standards , Humans , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health/economics , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Thailand
14.
Salud Publica Mex ; 54(3): 254-63, 2012 Jun.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22689163

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of the first pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) on cigarette packs in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 1 765 adult smokers from Guadalajara, Mexico, 2010. Logistic regression models were estimated to determine the association between recall of having purchased a pack with a pictorial HWL and psychosocial variables indicating their impact. RESULTS: 58% reported having purchased a pack with one of the pictorial HWLs, and these were considered the exposed population. Exposed smokers reported a greater frequency of thinking about smoking-related risks (34 vs. 25% p=0.003), and thinking about quitting smoking (23 vs. 14% p=0.001). Exposure to pictorial HWLs was also associated with a greater acceptability of HWLs as a means of communicating with smokers (93 vs. 87% p<0.001), as was the perception that the government communicates well about tobacco-related health risks (68 vs. 55% p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pictorial HWLs have made smokers think more about these risks and about quitting smoking. This policy should continue to be exploited as a cost-effective educational intervention.


Subject(s)
Advertising , Health Promotion , Product Labeling , Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Industry , Adolescent , Adult , Advertising/economics , Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Educational Status , Female , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Product Labeling/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Tobacco Industry/economics , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Urban Population , Young Adult
15.
Salud pública Méx ; 54(3): 254-263, mayo-jun. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-626697

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Mostrar el efecto de las primeras advertencias sanitarias (AS) con pictogramas en México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Encuesta transversal en una muestra representativa de 1 765 adultos fumadores de Guadalajara, México (2010). Se estimaron modelos logísticos para determinar la asociación entre el reconocimiento de las AS con pictogramas y las variables que indican el impacto de las mismas. RESULTADOS: 58% de la población indicó haber comprado una cajetilla con AS con pictogramas. Estos fumadores expuestos reportaron pensar con mayor frecuencia en los daños que causa fumar (34 contra 25% p=0.003) y pensar en dejar de fumar (23 contra 14% p=0.001). Se observó una mayor aceptación de las AS como medio para comunicar información importante al fumador (93 contra 87% p<0.001) así como mayor aceptación de que el gobierno comunica bien sobre los daños a la salud por fumar (68 contra 55% p<0.001). CONCLUSIÓN: Las AS con pictogramas han logrado aumentar el conocimiento sobre los daños que provoca el tabaco. La recomendación es seguir desarrollando y mejorando esta intervención para coadyuvar a lograr una población informada de los riesgos del tabaco.


OBJETIVE: Evaluate the impact of the first pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) on cigarette packs in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 1 765 adult smokers from Guadalajara, Mexico, 2010. Logistic regression models were estimated to determine the association between recall of having purchased a pack with a pictorial HWL and psychosocial variables indicating their impact. RESULTS: 58% reported having purchased a pack with one of the pictorial HWLs, and these were considered the exposed population. Exposed smokers reported a greater frequency of thinking about smoking-related risks (34 vs. 25% p=0.003), and thinking about quitting smoking (23 vs. 14% p=0.001). Exposure to pictorial HWLs was also associated with a greater acceptability of HWLs as a means of communicating with smokers (93 vs. 87% p<0.001), as was the perception that the government communicates well about tobacco-related health risks (68 vs. 55% p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pictorial HWLs have made smokers think more about these risks and about quitting smoking. This policy should continue to be exploited as a cost-effective educational intervention.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Advertising , Health Promotion , Product Labeling , Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Industry , Advertising/economics , Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Educational Status , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Mexico/epidemiology , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Product Labeling/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Industry/economics , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Urban Population
17.
Eur J Public Health ; 22(2): 251-3, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21441554

ABSTRACT

Plain (unbranded) packaging for cigarettes is at the top of the tobacco control agenda in both Australia and Europe. The evidence suggests that it will benefit public health by decreasing the appeal of tobacco products and increasing the power of the health warning. The tobacco industry instead argues that plain packaging would make it easier to counterfeit cigarettes, which would both confuse consumers and reduce price; thereby increasing consumption. Using focus group research we examined young adult smokers (N = 54) perceptions of, and ability to recognize, illicit tobacco and the possible impact of plain packaging on illicit tobacco purchasing behaviour. We found that the pack has no impact on the decision to buy illicit tobacco. Smokers were easily able to identify counterfeit cigarettes, not least by the pack, and buy it knowingly and in the full expectation that it will be inferior in quality. Illicit tobacco purchase, including that for counterfeit tobacco, was instead driven by availability and price. Given the extremely low manufacturing cost, per pack, of certain types of illicit cigarettes, it is difficult to envisage how plain packaging would alter the price of illicit tobacco in any meaningful way. The findings therefore suggest that a move to plain packaging would have no impact on young adult smokers' purchase behaviour.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Product Packaging/methods , Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Products/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude to Health , Australia , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/methods , Product Packaging/economics , Tobacco Products/economics , Young Adult
18.
J Environ Manage ; 90(11): 3561-73, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19595499

ABSTRACT

In this paper we conducted a hypothetical choice experiment in Shanghai, China, to examine whether the China Energy Efficiency Label influences consumers' choices of air conditioners and refrigerators. A latent class approach was applied to observe both heterogeneities among the respondents and product brands. Our results suggested that consumers in Shanghai were well aware of the China Energy Efficiency Label and tended to pay more attention to products with such labels. In addition, air conditioners and refrigerators affixed with a hypothetical label that indicates saving in electricity bills compared with a standard model received significant preferences, which suggested that the more information manufacturers provide, the more their products would be preferred by consumers. Finally, weighted by class probability, the willingness to pay values for more energy efficient refrigerators were higher than those for more energy efficient air conditioners, implying that Shanghai consumers have greater incentive to pay more for appliances they use more frequently.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Consumer Behavior , Financing, Personal , Product Labeling/economics , China , Humans
19.
Vox Sang ; 97(1): 61-8, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19490581

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Large-scale genotyping of blood donors for red blood cell and platelet antigens has been predicted to replace phenotyping assays in the screening of compatible blood components for alloimmunized patients. Although several genotyping platforms have been described, novel procedures and processes are needed to perform genotyping efficiently and to maximize its benefits for blood banks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we describe the processes and procedures developed to introduce large-scale genotyping in our routine operations. RESULTS: Preliminary cost-benefit analysis indicated that genotyping must target frequent blood donors (> 3 donations/year) to be efficiently used. A custom-designed computer application was developed to manage the whole project. It selects frequent donors among recent donations, prints coded labels to identify blood samples sent to the external genotyping laboratory, and stores genotyping results. It can search for donors compatible for any combination of the 22 genotyped antigens as well as consult the current inventory for the presence of the corresponding blood components. The phenotype of recovered components is confirmed by standard serology techniques prior to shipment to hospitals. CONCLUSION: Since October 2007, 10 555 blood donors have been genotyped. The database is used on a regular basis to find compatible blood components with a genotype-phenotype concordance of 99.6%.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion/economics , Blood Donors , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching/economics , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching/methods , Databases, Factual/economics , Donor Selection/economics , Donor Selection/methods , Computers , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Product Labeling/economics , Product Labeling/methods
20.
Vox Sang ; 97(1): 50-60, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19320963

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Radio frequency identification (RFID) can be a key enabler for enhancing productivity and safety of the blood product supply chain. This article describes a systematic approach developed by the RFID Blood Consortium for a comprehensive feasibility and impact assessment of RFID application in blood centre operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our comprehensive assessment approach incorporates process-orientated and technological perspectives as well as impact analysis. Assessment of RFID-enabled process redesign is based on generic core processes derived from the three participating blood centres. The technological assessment includes RFID tag readability and performance evaluation, testing of temperature and biological effects of RF energy on blood products, and RFID system architecture design and standards. The scope of this article is limited to blood centre processes (from donation to manufacturing/distribution) for selected mainstream blood products (red blood cells and platelets). RESULTS: Radio frequency identification can help overcome a number of common challenges and process inefficiencies associated with identification and tracking of blood products. High frequency-based RFID technology performs adequately and safely for red blood cell and platelet products. Productivity and quality improvements in RFID-enabled blood centre processes can recoup investment cost in a 4-year payback period. CONCLUSION: Radio frequency identification application has significant process-orientated and technological implications. It is feasible and economically justifiable to incorporate RFID into blood centre processes.


Subject(s)
Blood Banking/methods , Blood Platelets/cytology , Erythrocytes/cytology , Product Labeling/methods , Radio Waves , Radio , Blood Banks/economics , Blood Component Transfusion , Humans , Product Labeling/economics , Safety/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...