Analysis of urinary retention after endoscopic prostate enucleation and its subsequent impact on surgical outcomes.

PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary retention (PUR) is a common complication after prostate enucleation, which leads to an increased length of hospital stay and decreased postoperative satisfaction. This study determined the predictive factors of postoperative urine retention within 1 month after prostate enucleation and investigated whether PUR influences surgical outcomes at the 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up time points. METHODS: Data were collected from the electronic medical records of 191 patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) during October 2018 to September 2021. Of them, 180 patients who underwent thulium laser or plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP, PKEP) were separated into the PUR group (n = 24) and the non-PUR (NPUR) group (n = 156). Uroflowmetry and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire were followed up at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The PUR group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) than the NPUR group. Postoperatively, compared with the NPUR group, the PUR group had significantly less improvement in changes in the IPSS Quality of Life scores at 2 weeks, the total IPSS(International Prostate Symptom Score) at all follow-up times, the IPSS-S(IPSS storage subscores) at 2 weeks and 3 months, and the IPSS-V(IPSS voiding subscores) at all follow-up times. Predictive factors for PUR include lower preoperative maximum urinary flow (Qmax), lower preoperative total IPSS, and higher operation time. CONCLUSION: Lower preoperative Qmax, lower IPSS scores, and longer operation time were risk factors for PUR. Furthermore, PUR could be a prognostic factor for prostatic enucleation surgical outcomes.

What happens to orgasmic function after surgical benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH) treatments?

INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of subjects with benign prostate obstruction (BPO) has become a worldwide concern. The sexual problem after benign prostate enlargement (BPE) surgery that has received the most attention in the literature is ejaculation disorder. However, there appears to be a change in orgasmic sensation independent of ejaculation retention. The objective of our study is to explore the influence of BPE surgery on orgasmic function. METHODS: We evaluated the prospective, multicenter clinical data of 104 patients undergoing BPE surgery who reported maintaining sexual activity from January 2016 to November 2020. The endpoint of this study was to decipher the percentage of patients with an orgasm disorder as assessed by the difference between pre-and-postoperative question 10 of the IIEF 15 questionnaire. RESULTS: Orgasm function was stable, improved, and degraded in 34% (n=35), 30% (n=31), and 36% (n=38) respectively. A deterioration in orgasm was statistically significant in men who maintained quality ejaculation with retained force preoperatively and a high IIEF15 scale values preoperative of orgasmic function, overall and intercourse patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: To enable the patient to maintain a satisfying and healthy sex life after any BPE surgery, urologist physicians should know the prevalence of orgasmic side effects after surgical treatment to provide appropriate counseling to patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.

Is there a best timing for benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery?

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has shifted over the last decades, with medical therapy becoming the primary treatment modality while surgery is being reserved mostly to patients who are not responding to medical treatment or presenting with complications from BPH. Here, we aim to to discuss the optimal timing of surgical management of LUTS/BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on Pub-Med/MEDLINE database to identify reports published from January 1990 until January 2022 by combining the following MeSH terms: "Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms"; "Prostatic Hyperplasia"; "Prostatic Hyperplasia/therapy"; "Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications"; "Treatment Outcome"; "Time-to-Treatment". Evidence supporting or not early surgical treatment of BPH was examined and reported in a pros and cons form. RESULTS: The "pro early surgery" highlighted the superior efficacy and cost-effectiveness of surgery over medical treatment for BPH, as well as the possibility of worse postoperative outcomes for delayed surgical treatment. The "con early surgery" considered that medical therapy is efficient in well-selected patients and can avoid the serious risks inherent to surgical treatment of BPH including important sexual side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials comparing the outcomes for prolonged medical therapy versus early surgical treatment could determine which approach is more beneficial in the long-term in context of the aging population. Until then, both approaches have their advantages and patients should be involved in the treatment decision.

Membranous urethral length is the single independent predictor of urinary continence recovery at 12 months following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

The influence of anatomical parameters on urinary continence (UC) after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) remains uncharted. Our objective was to evaluate their association with UC at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Data from patients who underwent RS-RARP were prospectively collected. Continence was defined as no pad use. Anatomic variables were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of UC at each time point. We included 158 patients with a median age of 60 years, most of whom had a localized tumor (≤ cT2). On multivariate analyses, at 3 months post-surgery, urinary incontinence (UI) rises with age, odds ratio (OR) 1.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.004-1.142] and with prostate volume (PV), OR 1.029 (95% CI 1.006-1.052); it reduces with longer membranous urethral length (MUL), OR 0.875 (95% CI 0.780-0.983) and with higher membranous urethral volume (MUV), OR 0.299 (95% CI 0.121-0.737). At 6 months, UI rises with PV, OR 1.033 (95% CI 1.011-1.056) and decreases with MUV, OR 0.1504 (95% CI 0.050-0.444). Significantly, at 12 months post-surgery, the only predictor of UI is MUL, OR 0.830 (95% CI 0.706-0.975), establishing a threshold associated with a risk of UI of 5% (MUL > 15 mm) in opposition to a risk of 25% (MUL < 10 mm). This single institutional study requires external validation. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective cohort study supporting MUL as the single independent predictor of UC at 12 months post-surgery. By establishing MUL thresholds, we enable precise patient counseling.

4-Aminopyridine treatment for nerve injury resulting from radical retro-pubic prostatectomy: a single-center double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in men and leads to the second most common cause of cancer related mortality in men. Early detection of PCa allows for a potentially curative intervention. Most men will live over a decade from the time of their PCa diagnosis. Thus, treatments must balance curative interventions with their impact on quality of life. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one such potentially curative intervention but often leads to erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI). Approximately 90,000 RPs are performed each year in the USA. Post-operative ED and UI is thought to occur in part from traumatic peripheral nerve injury (TPNI) to the neurovascular bundles that surround the prostate. Thus, patients undergoing RP may be a population that would benefit from clinical studies that look at TPNI. METHODS: The study is a single-institution, double-blinded placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in which patients immediately post-RP receive either 4-aminopyrdine (4AP) or placebo in a 1:1 fashion. The primary outcome is evaluation of the efficacy of 4AP in accelerating the early return of baseline erectile and urinary function post-radical prostatectomy. DISCUSSION: This study is critical as it could reduce the morbidity associated with RP, a commonly performed operation, and identify a patient population that may greatly benefit into further TPNI research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03701581. Prospectively registered on October 10, 2018.

A Comprehensive Review of the Current State of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Salvage Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Salvage robot assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) is performed for patients with biochemical or biopsy proven, localized prostate cancer recurrences after radiation or ablative therapies. Traditionally, sRARP has been avoided by lower volume surgeons due to technical demand and high complication rates. Post-radiation sRARP outcomes studies exist but remain few in number. With increasing use of whole gland and focal ablative therapies, updates on sRARP in this setting are needed. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of recently reviewed studies on the oncologic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications after post-radiation and post-ablative sRARP. Tips and tricks are provided to guide surgeons who may perform sRARP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE for the most relevant articles pertaining to the outlined topics from 2010-2022 without limitation on study design. Only case reports, editorial comments, letters, and manuscripts in non-English languages were excluded. Key Content and Findings: Salvage robotic radical prostatectomy is performed in cases of biochemical recurrence after radiation or ablative therapies. Oncologic outcomes after sRARP are worse compared to primary surgery (pRARP) though improvements have been made with the robotic approach when compared to open salvage prostatectomy. Higher pre-sRARP PSA levels and more advanced pathologic stage portend worse oncologic outcomes. Patients meeting low-risk, EAU-biochemical recurrence criteria have improved oncologic outcomes compared to those with high-risk BCR. While complication rates in sRARP are higher compared to pRARP, Retzius sparing approaches may reduce complication rates, particularly rectal injuries. In comparison to the traditional open approach, sRARP is associated with a lower rate of bladder neck contracture. In terms of functional outcomes, potency rates after sRARP are poor and continence rates are low, though Retzius sparing approaches demonstrate acceptable recovery of urinary continence by 1 year, post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in the robotic platform and improvement in robotic experience have resulted in acceptable complication rates after sRARP. However, oncologic and functional outcomes after sRARP in both the post-radiation and post-ablation settings are worse compared to pRARP. Thus, when engaging in shared decision making with patients regarding the initial management of localized prostate cancer, patients should be educated regarding oncologic and functional outcomes and complications in the case of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer that may require sRARP.

Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review of the current outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: One recent addition to different lasers used for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate is the thulium fiber laser (TFL). The purpose of this systematic review is to present the feasibility, safety and efficacy of TFL Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuFLEP). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed®, Scopus® and Cochrane® primary databases were systematically screened. The search strategy used the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) criteria. Patients should be adults with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) undergoing ThuFLEP. While comparative studies reporting comparison of ThuFLEP to other BPO treatments were included, cohort studies with no comparison group were also accepted. Outcomes including enucleation time and complication rates were reported. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twelve studies met all the predefined criteria and were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Mean operative time and enucleation time ranged from 46.6±10.2 to 104.5±33.6 and from 38.8±17.9 to 66.0±24.9 minutes, respectively. Most of the complications were Grade I or Grade II ones. Although TFL was found to present some advantages over older BPO treatments, its outcomes were comparable with other endoscopic enucleation approaches. CONCLUSIONS: ThuFLEP seems to be a feasible, safe and efficient approach for BPO symptoms management. Limited evidence showed that although ThuFLEP was associated with a reduced total operative time, it was also associated with worse IPSS improvement at 1-year follow-up, when compared with MOSESTM Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). These findings confirm the well-established opinion that the enucleation technique itself is more important than the technology which is used.

Anorectal function and symptoms 6 months after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center study.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is a common procedure for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Anorectal symptoms such as fecal incontinence (FI), rectal urgency or disturbed defecation have been reported after the operation. Anorectal function is dependent on the integrity of anal and pelvic nerves and muscles, rectal sensory function as well as rectal reservoir function. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential influence of RALP on anorectal physiological function and bowel symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this pilot study, 29 patients with localised prostate cancer scheduled for RALP were included. Anorectal physiology was used to measure rectal sensitivity and reservoir function as well as anal sphincter pressures. Bowel symptoms were measured by a bowel function questionnaire and a 2-week bowel function diary. Measurements were done before the operation and repeated at 6 months after the operation. RESULTS: The study observed a significant postoperative increase in rectal sensory threshold for rectal balloon distention, from 20 to 40 mmHg, P < 0.001. This change is indicative of a decrease in rectal sensation after RALP. There were no other statistical significant differences in any of the physiological tests performed. Importantly, there was no change in any of the bowel symptoms after surgery. CONCLUSION: This study showed that RALP may lead to impaired rectal sensory function. This finding did not, however, seem to have any influence on the patients´ postoperative clinical bowel function.

The impact of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy II: a prospective, randomized, double blinded trial.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze postoperative ileus rates and postoperative complications between the different pneumoperitoneum settings. The secondary objective was to evaluate narcotic use and intraoperative blood loss between the different pneumoperitoneum settings. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double blinded study was conducted at pneumoperitoneum pressures of either 12 mmHg or 15 mmHg for patients undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection by a single high volume surgeon. RESULTS: The risk of ileus in the 12 mmHg group was 1.9% (2/105) compared to 3.2% (3/93) in the 15 mmHg group (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.1-3.6). There was no difference in the risk of any complication with a complication rate of 4.8% (5/105) in the 12 mmHg arm compared to 4.3% (4/93) in the 15 mmHg arm (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.3 - 4.3). CONCLUSION: Pneumoperitoneum pressure setting of 12 mmHg has no significant difference to 15 mmHg in the rate of postoperative complications, narcotic use, and intraoperative bleeding. Additional research is warranted to understand the optimal.

Identifying risk factors for hypoxemia during emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has emerged as an effective treatment for prostate cancer with obvious advantages. This study aims to identify risk factors related to hypoxemia during the emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing RALP. A cohort of 316 patients undergoing RALP was divided into two groups: the hypoxemia group (N = 134) and the non-hypoxemia group (N = 182), based on their postoperative oxygen fraction. Comprehensive data were collected from the hospital information system, including preoperative baseline parameters, intraoperative data, and postoperative recovery profiles. Risk factors were examined using multiple logistic regression analysis. The study showed that 38.9% of patients had low preoperative partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) levels. Several clinical parameters showed significant differences between the hypoxemia group and the non-hypoxemia group, including weight (P < 0.0001), BMI (P < 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.044), history of emphysema and pulmonary alveoli (P < 0.0001), low preoperative PaO2 (P < 0.0001), preoperative white blood cell count (P = 0.012), preoperative albumin (P = 0.048), intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.043), intraoperative CO2 accumulation (P = 0.001), duration of surgery (P = 0.046), postoperative hemoglobin level (P = 0.002), postoperative hypoxemia (P = 0.002), and early postoperative fever (P = 0.006). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed BMI (adjusted odds ratio = 0.696, 95% confidence interval 0.612-0.719), low preoperative PaO2 (adjusted odds ratio = 9.119, 95% confidence interval 4.834-17.203), and history of emphysema and pulmonary alveoli (adjusted odds ratio = 2.804, 95% confidence interval 1.432-5.491) as independent factors significantly associated with hypoxemia on emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing RALP. Our results demonstrate that BMI, lower preoperative PaO2, and a history of emphysema and pulmonary alveolar disease are independent risk factors associated with hypoxemia on emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing RALP. These findings provide a theoretical framework for surgeons and anesthesiologists to facilitate strategies to mitigate postoperative hypoxemia in this unique patient population.

Feasibility and safety of dual-console telesurgery with the KangDuo Surgical Robot-1500 System using fifth-generation and wired networks: an animal experiment and sea-spanning clinical study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of dual-console telesurgery with the new KangDuo system in an animal experiment and clinical study. METHODS: Six canine models were performed radical prostatectomy with dual-console KanDuo surgical robot-1500 (KD-SR-1500-RARP). The perioperative outcomes, physical and mental workload of the surgeon were collected. Physical workload was evaluated with surface electromyography. Mental workload was evaluated with NASA-TLX. After conducting animal experiments to verify safety of dual-console KD-SR-1500-RARP, we conducted the clinical trial using 5G and wired networks. RESULTS: In the animal experiment, all surgeries were performed successfully. The operative time was 80.2±32.1 min. The docking time was 2.4±0.5 min. The console time was 49.7±25.3 min. There were no perioperative complications or equipment related adverse events. All dogs can micturate after catheter removal at one week postoperatively. The mental workload was at a low level (a scale ranging from 0 to 60), which scored 15.7±6.9. Among the eight recorded muscles, the fatigue degree of the right radial flexor and left biceps was the highest two (iEMG, resection, 299.8±344 uV, 109.9±16.9 uV; suture, 849.4±1252.5 uV, 423.1±621.3 uV, respectively). In the clinical study, the console time was 136 min. The mean latency time was ≤200 ms. The data pocket loss was <1%. The operation was successfully completed without malfunctions occurring throughout the entire process. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-console telesurgery with the KD-SR-1500 system was shown to be feasible and safe in radical prostatectomy using 5G and wired networks.

Enhancing continence post holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: assessment of novel technique through randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Transient urinary incontinence (UI) is distressing event following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Novel technique namely, veil sparing HoLEP (VS-HoLEP), was proposed to improve early continence outcome. In this trial (NCT03494049), VS-HoLEP was compared to standard HoLEP (St-HoLEP). METHODS: VS-HoLEP entails early apical separation with sparing of ventral apical mucosal veil proximal to the verumontanum. Eligible symptomatic BPH patients were randomly allocated to St-HoLEP (91) and VS-HoLEP (89). The primary outcome was UI as depicted by one-hour pad test at one month postoperatively. Other outcome measures include all perioperative parameters, complications, and urinary outcome measures at different follow-up points. RESULTS: Median preoperative prostate size was 138 (50:282) and 128 (50:228) mL in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively. At one month the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test was 21 (23.1%) and 10 (11.4%) in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P 0.047). The difference was significantly in favor of VS-HoLEP considering the number of patients reporting UI, the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test as well as the grade of UI reported at one and 4 months. The difference was not statistically significant at 12 months. The median time to patients' reported continence was 8 (1-52) and 1.5 (1-52) weeks in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P≤0.005). The technique independently predicted positive one-hour pad test at one and four months respectively. At twelve months presence of DM (diabetes mellitus) and more percent PSA reduction independently predicted positive one-hour pad test. CONCLUSIONS: Veil sparing HoLEP enhances significantly early postoperative urine continence both subjectively and objectively. Optimization of the surgical technique could cut short the number of leaking patients and reduce the degree as well as the duration of transient postoperative urine leak.

Urethral-sparing laparoscopic simple prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with asymptomatic urethral stricture after urethral stricture surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of urethral-sparing laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (US-LSP) for the treatment of large-volume (>80 ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with asymptomatic urethral stricture (urethral lumen > 16 Fr) after urethral stricture surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 39 large-volume BPH patients with asymptomatic urethral stricture after urethral stricture surgery who underwent US-LSP from January 2016 to October 2021. Postoperative follow-ups were scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: All patients affected by significant BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including 22 cases with asymptomatic anterior urethral stricture and 17 cases with asymptomatic posterior urethral stricture. Median operative time was 118 min (interquartile range [IQR]100-145). Median estimated blood loss was 224 ml (IQR: 190-255). 33 patients(84.6%) avoided continuous bladder irrigation. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (12.8%), including 4 cases with Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and grade 2 and 1 case with grade 3a. During follow-up, US-LSP presented statistically significant improvements in LUTS compared to baseline (P < 0.05). A total of 25 patients had normal ejaculation preoperatively and 3 patients (12%) complained retrograde ejaculation postoperatively. Two patients (5.1%) reported stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and no patient reported aggravated urethral stricture during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: US-LSP was safe and effective in treating large-volume BPH with asymptomatic urethral stricture after urethral stricture surgery. Meanwhile, US-LSP could reduce the risk of SUI in patients with asymptomatic posterior urethral stricture and maintain ejaculatory function in a high percentage of patients.

The effect of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block on postoperative analgesia in robot assisted prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain continues to represent an important problem even after minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, which results in discomfort in the postoperative period and sometimes prolongs hospital stays. Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are used in addition to systemic analgesics with the multimodal approach in postoperative pain management. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks are becoming increasingly important, especially in minimally invasive surgeries. Another important cause of discomfort is urinary catheter pain. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effect of rectus sheath block on postoperative pain and catheter-related bladder discomfort in robotic prostatectomy operations. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted from March to August 2022. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Approval for the study was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. All individuals provided written informed consent, and adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Condition classification I to III planned for robotic prostatectomy operations under general anesthesia were enrolled. Following computer-assisted randomization, patients were divided into 2 groups, and general anesthesia was induced in all cases. Rectus sheath block was performed under general anesthesia and at the end of the surgery. No fascial plane block was applied to the patients in the non-rectus sheath block (RSB) group.Postoperative pain and urinary catheter pain were assessed using a numerical rating scale. Fentanyl was planned as rescue analgesia in the recovery room. In case of numerical rating scale scores of 4 or more, patients were given 50 µg fentanyl IV, repeated if necessary. The total fentanyl dose administered was recorded in the recovery room. IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia was planned for all patients. All patients' pain (postoperative pain at surgical site and urethral catheter discomfort) scores and total morphine consumption in the recovery unit and during follow-ups on the ward (3, 6, 12, and 24 hours) in the postoperative period were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were evaluated. Total tramadol consumption during follow-up on the ward was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Fentanyl consumption in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Total morphine consumption was significantly lower in the RSB group at 0 to 12 hours and 12 to 24 hours. Total opioid consumption was 8.81 mg in the RSB group and 19.87 mg in the non-RSB group. A statistically significant decrease in urethral catheter pain was noted in the RSB group at all time points. CONCLUSION: RSB exhibits effective analgesia by significantly reducing postoperative opioid consumption in robotic prostatectomy operations.

Safety and complications of continuation of aspirin therapy in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy.

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of continued perioperative aspirin at the time of robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). We performed a retrospective review of our IRB approved institutional database of patients who underwent RASP between 2013 and 2022. Comparative groups included patients taking aspirin in the perioperative period and those not taking aspirin pre-operatively. The primary outcome was any post-operative bleeding related complication using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included the identification of risk factors for increased blood loss in the entire study population, operative time, and blood transfusion requirement. 143 patients underwent RASP of which 55 (38.5%) patients continued perioperative aspirin therapy and 88 (61.5%) patients did not. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Patients taking perioperative aspirin had a higher rate of hypertension (74.5% vs 58.0%, p = 0.04) and other cardiovascular disease (30.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.007). Postoperative complications were similar between the groups (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3; p = 0.43). Median blood loss (150 cc vs 150 cc, p = 0.38), percentage drop in hemoglobin (13.4 vs 13.2, p = 0.94) and blood transfusion rate (3.6 vs 1.1, p = 0.56) were also similar between groups. The median blood loss was 150 ml for the whole study population. On regression analysis, neither aspirin nor any other variable was associated with increased blood loss (> 150 ml). Aspirin can be safely continued perioperatively in patients undergoing RASP without any risk of bleeding related complications, blood loss, or increased transfusion rate.

Ten-year functional and oncological outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Among prostate cancer (PCa) treatment options, mini-invasive surgical approaches have gained a wide diffusion in the last decades. The aim of this study was to present oncological, functional, and quality of life data after 10 years of follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) (ISRCTN11552140) comparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) for the treatment of PCa. METHODS: Patients with localized PCa were randomized to undergo LRP or RARP between January 2010 and January 2011. Functional (continence and potency) and oncological (prostate-specific antigen, biochemical recurrence [BCR] and BCR-free survival [BCRFS]) variables were evaluated. BCRFS curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Machine learning partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to identify the variables characterizing more the patients who underwent RARP or LRP. RESULTS: Seventy-five of the originally enrolled 120 patients remained on follow-up for 10 years; 40 (53%) underwent RARP and 35 (47%) LRP. Continence and potency recovery rates did not show significant differences (p = 0.068 and p = 0.56, respectively), despite a Δ12% for continence and Δ8% for potency in favor of the robotic approach. However, the quality of continence (in terms of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form [ICIQ-SF] score) and erection (in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5] score) was significantly better after 10 years in the robotic group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). PLS-DA revealed that LRP was characterized by the worst functional-related outcomes analyzing the entire follow-up period. Four (10%) and six (17%) patients experienced BCR in RARP and LRP groups, respectively (p = 0.36), with an overall 10-year BCR-free survival of 88% and 78% (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable continence and potency rates were observed between RARP and LRP after a 10-year follow-up. However, the RARP group exhibited superior totally dry rate and erection quality. No difference in terms of oncological outcomes was found.

[Antibacterial prophylaxis with fosfomycin at the time of the urethral catheter removal after radical prostatectomy (prospective randomized trial)].

AIM: To evaluate the effect of antibacterial prophylaxis using oral fosfomycin during the removal of a urethral catheter after radical prostatectomy on the development of urinary tract infection, severity of leukocyturia and bacteriuria, as well as the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, non-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out. The main group included 40 patients, and the control group included 37 patients. In the group 1, patients received two doses of oral fosfomycin, 3 g, namely in the evening on the day of catheter removal (the first dose) and 48 hours after catheter removal (the second dose). In the group 2, patients did not receive any antibacterial prophylaxis after urethral catheter removal. The endpoints of the study were confirmed episodes of urinary tract infection within 1 month after removal of the urethral catheter, leukocyturia and bacteriuria in urinalysis/urine culture) and severity of the lower urinary tract symptoms assessed by IPSS questionnaire. RESULTS: In the group 2, urinary tract infection was noted in 17.1%, while in the group 2 only in 2.6% of patients (p=0.032). Leukocyturia and bacteriuria were significantly less common in the group receiving antibacterial prophylaxis with fosfomycin (18.4% vs. 48.6%, respectively; p=0.006). Positive urine culture was observed in 7.9% vs. 25.7%, respectively (p=0.035). Four weeks after removal of the urethral catheter, the average IPSS score was significantly higher in the group 2 (13.2 vs. 9.5 points; p=0.002). There were no cases of allergic reaction and pseudomembranous colitis associated with C. difficile in both groups. Diarrhea cured with sorbents was noted in 2 patients (5.2%) in fosfomycin group. CONCLUSION: Antibacterial prophylaxis using two oral doses of fosfomycin 3 g on the day of urethral catheter removal and 48 hours after catheter removal after radical prostatectomy appears to be an effective scheme that reduces the incidence of urinary tract infection and the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms, and is characterized by a minimal risk of adverse events. It is necessary to carried out further research and develop clear recommendations for antibacterial prevention in urological interventions requiring prolonged urethral catheterization.

Persistent Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After BPH Surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after surgical management for BPH pose a significant clinical challenge for urologists. Despite high success rates in relieving LUTS, there is a subset of patients who experience persistent symptoms after intervention. In this review article, we describe the management of patients with new or persistent LUTS after endoscopic bladder outlet surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Previously, the goal for BPH management was to remove as much adenomatous tissue as possible. While potentially effective, this may lead to unwanted side effects. There has been a recent paradigm shift for new minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) that strategically treat adenomatous tissue, adding potential complexity in managing patients with new or residual symptoms in the postoperative setting. There is a paucity of literature to guide optimal workup and care of patients with persistent LUTS after surgical management. We characterize patients into distinct groups, defined by types of symptoms, irritative versus obstructive, and timing of the symptomatology, short term versus long term. By embracing this patient-centered approach with shared decision management, clinicians can optimize outcomes efficiently improving their patients' quality of life.

Ejaculatory and erectile function outcomes following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

PURPOSE: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a surgical treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Many men develop retrograde ejaculation postprocedure, but there is conflicting evidence regarding sexual function outcomes post-HoLEP. We sought to examine significant variations in patient-reported erectile and ejaculatory function within 12 months post-HoLEP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study for patients who underwent HoLEP between Nov 2018 and Feb 2022. Of the reviewed patients, 277 patients met inclusion criteria and completed pre and postoperative questionnaires, which included the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire- Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EJD) and the International Index of Erectile Function/Sexual Health Inventory for Men (IIEF-5/SHIM). Surveys were provided to patients up to 12 months postprocedure. Demographics and comorbidities associated with sexual dysfunction were collected. Responses to each question were analyzed to detect sub-categorical variations in sexual function as the secondary objective. Data was analyzed by using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: There was a significant decline in total scores for the MSHQ-EJD (8.70 pre-HoLEP vs. 6.58 post HoLEP, p ≤ 0.001) including a significant decline (p < 0.005) in questions 1-3 which assess ejaculatory ability, strength, and volume. There was not a significant decline in question 4 which assesses bother (2.552 pre-HoLEP vs. 3.119 post-HoLEP, p = 0.526). There was not a significant decline in the IIEF-5/SHIM postoperatively (11.51 pre-HoLEP vs. 13.327 post-HoLEP, p = 0.498). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing HoLEP do not experience a decline in erectile function. Patients do experience a decline in ejaculatory function but did not find this bothersome.