Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 584
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2414599, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833251

ABSTRACT

Importance: It is uncertain to what extent watchful waiting (WW) in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and a life expectancy of less than 10 years is associated with adverse consequences. Objective: To report transitions to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), death from PCa, or death from other causes in men treated with a WW strategy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, population-based cohort study included men with nonmetastatic PCa diagnosed since 2007 and registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden with WW as the primary treatment strategy and with life expectancy less than 10 years. Life expectancy was calculated based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and a drug comorbidity index. Observed state transition models complemented observed data to extend follow-up to more than 20 years. Analyses were performed between 2022 and 2023. Exposure: Nonmetastatic PCa. Main Outcomes and Measures: Transitions to ADT, CRPC, death from PCa, and death from other causes were measured using state transition modeling. Results: The sample included 5234 men (median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 81 [79-84] years). After 5 years, 954 men with low-risk PCa (66.2%) and 740 with high-risk PCa (36.1%) were still alive and not receiving ADT. At 10 years, the corresponding proportions were 25.5% (n = 367) and 10.4% (n = 213), respectively. After 10 years, 59 men with low-risk PCa (4.1%) and 221 with high-risk PCa (10.8%) had transitioned to CRPC. Ten years after diagnosis, 1330 deaths in the low-risk group (92.3%) and 1724 in the high-risk group (84.1%) were from causes other than PCa. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the WW management strategy is appropriate for minimizing adverse consequences of PCa in men with a baseline life expectancy of less than 10 years.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Prostatic Neoplasms , Watchful Waiting , Humans , Male , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Sweden/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Life Expectancy , Registries , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Disease Progression
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(10)2024 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791557

ABSTRACT

A promising de novo approach for the treatment of Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) exploits cell-mediated enzyme prodrug therapy comprising cytosine deaminase (CD) and fluorouracil (5-FC). The aim of this study was to determine the potential of bacterial CD-overexpressing hTERT-immortalized human adipose stem cells (hTERT-ADSC.CD) to suppress CRPC. A lentiviral vector encoding a bacterial CD gene was used to transfect and to generate the hTERT-ADSC.CD line. The ability of the cells to migrate selectively towards malignant cells was investigated in vitro. PC3 and hTERT-ADSC.CD cells were co-cultured. hTERT-ADSC.CD and 1 × 106 PC3 cells were administered to nude mice via intracardiac and subcutaneous injections, respectively, and 5-FC was given for 14 days. hTERT-ADSC.CD were successfully engineered. Enhanced in vitro hTERT-ADSC.CD cytotoxicity and suicide effect were evident following administration of 5 µM 5-FC. hTERT-ADSC.CD, together with 5-FC, augmented the numbers of PC3 cells undergoing apoptosis. In comparison to controls administered hTERT-ADSC.CD monotherapy, hTERT-ADSC.CD in combination with 5-FC demonstrated a greater suppressive effect on tumor. In CPRC-bearing mice, tumor suppression was enhanced by the combination of CD-overexpressing ADSC and the prodrug 5-FC. Stem cells exhibiting CD gene expression are a potential novel approach to treatment for CRPC.


Subject(s)
Cytosine Deaminase , Flucytosine , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Telomerase , Humans , Male , Animals , Telomerase/genetics , Telomerase/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Mice , Flucytosine/pharmacology , Cytosine Deaminase/genetics , Cytosine Deaminase/metabolism , Mice, Nude , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Stem Cells/metabolism , Stem Cells/drug effects , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Adipose Tissue/cytology , PC-3 Cells
3.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 197: 104348, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588967

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common health threat to men worldwide, and castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) is the leading cause of PCa-related deaths. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bilayer compartments secreted by living cells that are important mediators of intercellular communication. EVs regulate the biological processes of recipient cells by transmitting heterogeneous cargoes, contributing to CRPC occurrence, progression, and drug resistance. These EVs originate not only from malignant cells, but also from various cell types within the tumor microenvironment. EVs are widely dispersed throughout diverse biological fluids and are attractive biomarkers derived from noninvasive liquid biopsy techniques. EV quantities and cargoes have been tested as potential biomarkers for CRPC diagnosis, progression, drug resistance, and prognosis; however, technical barriers to their clinical application continue to exist. Furthermore, exogenous EVs may provide tools for new therapies for CRPC. This review summarizes the current evidence on the role of EVs in CRPC.


Subject(s)
Extracellular Vesicles , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Humans , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Male , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Tumor Microenvironment , Animals
4.
Oncogene ; 43(22): 1655-1668, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658776

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer (CaP) remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in western men. CaP mortality results from diverse molecular mechanisms that mediate resistance to the standard of care treatments for metastatic disease. Recently, alternative splicing has been recognized as a hallmark of CaP aggressiveness. Alternative splicing events cause treatment resistance and aggressive CaP behavior and are determinants of the emergence of the two major types of late-stage treatment-resistant CaP, namely castration-resistant CaP (CRPC) and neuroendocrine CaP (NEPC). Here, we review recent multi-omics data that are uncovering the complicated landscape of alternative splicing events during CaP progression and the impact that different gene transcript isoforms can have on CaP cell biology and behavior. We discuss renewed insights in the molecular machinery by which alternative splicing occurs and contributes to the failure of systemic CaP therapies. The potential for alternative splicing events to serve as diagnostic markers and/or therapeutic targets is explored. We conclude by considering current challenges and promises associated with splicing-modulating therapies, and their potential for clinical translation into CaP patient care.


Subject(s)
Alternative Splicing , Disease Progression , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Alternative Splicing/genetics , Male , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Animals
5.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 26(5): 488-495, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592590

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to explore the evolving landscape of treatments available for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients. RECENT FINDINGS: In less than a decade, evidence was chronologically provided that (1) systemic treatment intensification with docetaxel improves outcomes, including survival, in men with mCSPC, (2) then that these outcomes are also improved when a second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) is combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and (3) using a "triplet systemic therapy," which consists in the combination of ADT, an ARPI and docetaxel, further improves outcomes, including survival. Radiotherapy to the prostate combined with ADT alone is now recommended in men with low-volume mCSPC. Combining prostate radiotherapy and intensified systemic treatment including abiraterone may be synergistic as suggested in the PEACE-1 trial. Also, the role of metastases-directed local therapies (mostly stereotactic radiotherapy) is currently being assessed in phase 3 trials. Finally, the integration of biomarkers (e.g. BRCA2 gene alterations, PTEN loss, PSMA expression) for decision making is not currently established, though trials are also currently underway. Importantly, most evidence currently available was obtained in men with de novo metastases, while for those with metastatic relapse after definitive local treatment, the role of treatment intensification is less well established. Treatment intensification is nowadays the standard of care for patients with de novo mCSPC as it leads to outcomes improvement, including survival, and the standard of care is evolving almost on a yearly basis.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Metastasis , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use
6.
Cancer Immunol Res ; 12(5): 559-574, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38407894

ABSTRACT

Sipuleucel-T (sip-T) is the only FDA-approved autologous cellular immunotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To elucidate parameters of the response profile to this therapy, we report high-dimensional analyses of sip-T using cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) and show a lymphoid predominance, with CD3+ T cells constituting the highest proportion (median ∼60%) of sip-T, followed by B cells, and natural killer (NK) and NKT cells. We hypothesized that treatment of sip-T with homeostatic cytokines known to activate/expand effector lymphocytes could augment efficacy against prostate tumors. Of the cytokines tested, IL15 was the most effective at enhancing activation and proliferation of effector lymphocytes, as well as augmenting tumor cytotoxicity in vitro. Co-culture of sip-T with IL15 and control or prostate-relevant antigens showed substantial activation and expansion of CD8+ T cells and NKT cells in an antigen-specific manner. Adoptive transfer of IL15-treated sip-T into NSG mice resulted in more potent prostate tumor growth inhibition compared with control sip-T. Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes revealed a 2- to 14-fold higher influx of sip-T and a significant increase in IFNγ producing CD8+ T cells and NKT cells within the tumor microenvironment in the IL15 group. In conclusion, we put forward evidence that IL15 treatment can enhance the functional antitumor immunity of sip-T, providing rationale for combining IL15 or IL15 agonists with sip-T to treat patients with mCRPC.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-15 , Lymphocyte Activation , Tissue Extracts , Interleukin-15/pharmacology , Animals , Male , Tissue Extracts/pharmacology , Humans , Mice , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods
7.
Int J Urol ; 31(6): 590-597, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345202

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy has achieved significant success in treating prostate cancer through strategies centered on the androgen receptor. However, the emergence of castration-resistant prostate cancer highlights this therapy limitation, underscoring the need to elucidate the mechanisms of treatment resistance. This review aimed to focus on multifaceted resistance mechanisms, including androgen receptor overexpression, splice variants, missense mutations, the involvement of the glucocorticoid receptor, and alterations in coregulators and transcription factors, revealing their roles in castration-resistant prostate cancer progression. These mechanisms promote cell survival and proliferation, depending on the androgen receptor signaling pathway, leading to resistance to conventional therapies. Amplification and mutations in the androgen receptor gene facilitate selective adaptation in treatment-resistant cells, consequently diminishing therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, the activation of glucocorticoid receptors and aberrant regulation of specific coregulators and transcription factors contribute to the activation of androgen receptor-independent signaling pathways, promoting cell survival and proliferation. These findings hold promise for identifying new targets for treating castration-resistant prostate cancer and developing personalized treatment strategies. The development of future therapies will hinge on precisely targeting the androgen receptor signaling pathway, necessitating a deeper understanding of the molecular targets unique to castration-resistant prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Receptors, Androgen , Signal Transduction , Humans , Male , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Cell Proliferation , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics
8.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(2): 380-384, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38185609

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-targeted radionucleotide therapy has been shown to cause dry mouth, but the oral manifestations of PSMA-targeted immunotherapy have not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to describe and quantify the oral manifestations of PSMA-targeted immunotherapies (bispecific antibodies or Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell therapies) in the management of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the oral toxicities of PSMA-targeted immunotherapies of the patients seen at a single institution's cancer center between 2020 and 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: In a total of 19 patients treated with PSMA-targeted immunotherapies between 2020 and 2023, 9 patients (47%) experienced the following oral toxicities: xerostomia (n = 6; 32%), mucositis (n = 2; 10%), dysgeusia, dry throat and teeth sensitivity in (n = 1 each; 5%), respectively. Oral infections, such as candidiasis and herpes simplex, were not observed in any patients. Mucositis was managed with salt rinses and resolved within few months from onset. Xerostomia persisted in all the patients (median: 306 days, range: 98-484 days) among those who reported dry mouth at the time of data collection, despite treatment with salivary stimulants (n = 5; 83%). Dysgeusia was also persistent, although it was not specifically treated. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with PSMA-targeted immunotherapies for prostate cancer can present with various short-term and long-term off-tumor on-target oral toxicities including xerostomia and dysgeusia that may affect quality of life. This study serves as a foundation to future prospective studies with a larger sample size and also helps oncologists managing prostate cancer patients with targeted immunotherapies to familiarize common oral toxicities. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of oral medicine consultation for a comprehensive oral examination and management of oral complications.


Subject(s)
Mucositis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Xerostomia , Male , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Mucositis/chemically induced , Retrospective Studies , Dysgeusia/chemically induced , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Radiopharmaceuticals , Dipeptides , Xerostomia/chemically induced , Immunotherapy/adverse effects
9.
Prostate ; 84(5): 426-440, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although most patients with prostate cancer (PC) respond to initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), castration-resistant disease invariably develops. Progression to treatment-emergent neuroendocrine PC (t-NEPC) represents a unique mechanism of resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy in which lineage plasticity and neuroendocrine differentiation induce a phenotypic switch from an AR-driven adenocarcinoma to an AR-independent NEPC. t-NEPC is characterized by an aggressive clinical course, increased resistance to AR-targeted therapies, and a poor overall prognosis. METHODS: This review provides an overview of our current knowledge of NEPC, with a focus on the unmet needs, diagnosis, and clinical management of t-NEPC. RESULTS: Evidence extrapolated from the literature on small cell lung cancer or data from metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) cohorts enriched for t-NEPC suggests an increased sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. However, optimal strategies for managing t-NEPC have not been established, and prospective clinical trial data are limited. Intertumoral heterogeneity within a given patient, as well as the lack of robust molecular or clinical biomarkers for early detection, often lead to delays in diagnosis and prolonged treatment with suboptimal strategies (i.e., conventional chemohormonal therapies for mCRPC), which may further contribute to poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances in genomic and molecular classification of NEPC and the development of novel biomarkers may facilitate an early diagnosis, help to identify promising therapeutic targets, and improve the selection of patients most likely to benefit from NEPC-targeted therapies.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Biomarkers , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/therapy , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/genetics
10.
Cancer Gene Ther ; 31(2): 250-258, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38072969

ABSTRACT

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is challenging to treat. Virus-like particles (VLPs), originating from JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) and carrying a suicide gene driven by the PSA promoter (PSAtk-VLPs), can inhibit tumor growth in animal models of human prostate cancer. However, the efficacy of suppression of orthotopic PCa growth and metastasis by PSAtk-VLPs remains undetermined. Here, we established an iRFP stable expression CRPC cell line suitable for deep-tissue observation using fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT). These cells were implanted into murine prostate tissue, and PSAtk-VLPs were systemically administered via the tail vein along with the prodrug ganciclovir (GCV), allowing for the real-time observation of orthotopic prostate tumor growth and CRPC tumor metastasis. Our findings demonstrated that systemic PSAtk-VLPs administration with GCV and subsequent FMT scanning facilitated real-time observation of the suppressed growth in mouse iRFP CRPC orthotopic tumors, which further revealed a notable metastasis rate reduction. Systemic PSAtk-VLPs and GCV administration effectively inhibited orthotopic prostate cancer growth and metastasis. These findings suggest the potential of JCPyV VLPs as a promising vector for mCRPC gene therapy. Conclusively, systemically administered JCPyV VLPs carrying a tissue-specific promoter, JCPyV VLPs can protect genes within the bloodstream to be specifically expressed in specific organs.


Subject(s)
JC Virus , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Humans , Mice , Animals , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Genetic Therapy/methods , Cell Line, Tumor
11.
Aktuelle Urol ; 55(2): 107-115, 2024 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37748510

ABSTRACT

The systemic treatment of prostate cancer nowadays is predominantly carried out with combination therapies. A range of aspects should be respected in older and comorbid patients, in order to avoid toxicities and to achieve a successful therapy alongside good quality of life. The definition of geriatric patients is not primarily based on chronological age but rather on the overall health condition and life expectancy. Comorbid patients > 70 years should undergo a three-step geriatric screening before treatment initiation. If the G8 screening and/or mini-COG shows abnormalities (taking into account nutrition, comorbidity/medication, mobility, and cognition), a simplified geriatric assessment is recommended. Patients can then be stratified into three groups (fit, vulnerable, frail). Only a few cases warrant a complete geriatric assessment. Treatable deficits in the above mentioned domains should be improved if possible. When choosing a systemic therapy, fit patients can be treated the same as non-geriatric patients. Vulnerable and frail patients are under a higher risk for toxicities, so special care should be taken. While the diverse substances of hormonal therapy are usually well tolerated (even though some substance-specific toxicities can occur), haematotoxic substances such as taxanes or olaparib can only be recommended in select cases. As falls - especially under hormonal therapy - are a common problem, osteoprotective therapy should especially be considered. Upon progression of the tumour disease, there should not be a reflex to simply switch to the next line of treatment, but an individual concept should be established together with the patient and his relatives, taking into account aspects of palliative care and patient needs and focussing on quality of life and also setting therapy limitations.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Aged , Humans , Quality of Life , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Comorbidity , Taxoids
13.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 50(10): 1038-1042, 2023 Oct.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38035830

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is basically hormone sensitive tumor. However, once it turns to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer(mCRPC), it is hard to suppress tumor growth and metastasis. Despite chemotherapy and novel androgen-receptor signalling inhibitors, mCRPC remains a lethal disease with poor clinical outcomes. Immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor T(CAR-T)cells redirects a patient's immune cells against the tumor antigen. CAR-T cell therapy has demonstrated promise in treating patients with several haematological malignancies. On the other hand, solid tumors impose immunologic and physical barriers to the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy. As a new strategy to mCRPC, CAR-T cells with targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen(PSMA)has been developed. Several clinical trials using anti PSMA-CAR-T cells against mCRPC are going on overseas. A few of the trials showed promising results on the safety and efficacy of this therapy in mCRPC. Herein, we review strategies of constructing CAR-T cells to mCRPC, and the latest reports of international clinical trials of anti PSMA-CAR-T therapy.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Immunotherapy , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Treatment Outcome
14.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 7: e2300085, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37862671

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Several novel therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) have been approved with randomized phase III studies with continuing observational research either planned or ongoing. Accurately identifying patients with CRPC in electronic health care data is critical for quality observational research, resource allocation, and quality improvement. Previous work in this area has relied on either structured laboratory results and medication data or natural language processing (NLP) methods. However, a computable phenotype using both structured data and NLP identifies these patients with more accuracy. METHODS: The Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) was used to collect PCa diagnoses, prostate-specific antigen test results, and information regarding patient characteristics and medication use. The final system used for validation and subsequent analysis combined the NLP system and an algorithm of structured laboratory and medication data to identify patients as being diagnosed with CRPC. Patients with both a documented diagnosis of CRPC and a documented diagnosis of metastatic PCa were classified as having mCRPC by this system. RESULTS: Among 1.2 million veterans with PCa, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis code for CRPC (Z19.2) identifies 3,791 patients from 2016 when the code was created until 2022, compared with the combined algorithm which identifies 14,103, 10,312 more than ICD-10 codes alone, from 2016 to 2022. The combined algorithm showed a sensitivity of 97.9% and a specificity of 99.2%. CONCLUSION: ICD-10 codes proved to be insufficient for capturing CRPC in the VHA CDW data. Using both structured and unstructured data identified more than double the number of patients compared with ICD-10 codes alone. Application of this combined approach drastically improved identification of real-world patients and enables high-quality observational research in mCRPC.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Natural Language Processing
15.
Future Oncol ; 19(30): 2055-2073, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823367

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy is a common treatment method for metastatic prostate cancer through lowering androgen levels; however, this therapy frequently leads to the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This is attributed to the activation of the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway. Current treatments targeting AR are often ineffective mostly due to AR gene overexpression and mutations, as well as the presence of splice variants that accelerate CRPC progression. Thus there is a critical need for more specific medication to treat CRPC. Small interfering RNAs have shown great potential as a targeted therapy. This review discusses prostate cancer progression and the role of AR signaling in CRPC, and proposes siRNA-based targeted therapy as a promising strategy for CRPC.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Androgens , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/therapeutic use , Signal Transduction
16.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 21(10): 1067-1096, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856213

ABSTRACT

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer provide a framework on which to base decisions regarding the workup of patients with prostate cancer, risk stratification and management of localized disease, post-treatment monitoring, and treatment of recurrence and advanced disease. The Guidelines sections included in this article focus on the management of metastatic castration-sensitive disease, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and metastatic CRPC (mCRPC). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with treatment intensification is strongly recommended for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. For patients with nonmetastatic CRPC, ADT is continued with or without the addition of certain secondary hormone therapies depending on prostate-specific antigen doubling time. In the mCRPC setting, ADT is continued with the sequential addition of certain secondary hormone therapies, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, radiopharmaceuticals, and/or targeted therapies. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel emphasizes a shared decision-making approach in all disease settings based on patient preferences, prior treatment exposures, the presence or absence of visceral disease, symptoms, and potential side effects.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Hormones/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy
17.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(9): e2334208, 2023 09 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37721753

ABSTRACT

Importance: Black men have higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer. Whether precision oncology disparities affect Black men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. Objective: To compare precision medicine data and outcomes between Black and White men with mCRPC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data collected by the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) consortium, a multi-institutional registry with linked clinicogenomic data, from April 2020 to December 2021. Participants included Black and White patients with mCRPC with molecular data. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to May 2023. Exposures: Database-reported race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the frequency of actionable molecular data, defined as the presence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), homologous recombination repair deficiency, or tumor mutational burden of 10 mutations per megabase or greater. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of other alterations, the type and timing of genomic testing performed, and use of targeted therapy. Efficacy outcomes were prostate-specific antigen response rate, site-reported radiographic response, and overall survival. Results: A total of 962 eligible patients with mCRPC were identified, including 204 Black patients (21.2%; median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 61 [55-67] years; 131 patients [64.2%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 92 patients [45.1%] with de novo metastatic disease) and 758 White patients (78.8%; median [IQR] age, 63 [57-69] years; 445 patients [58.7%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 310 patients [40.9%] with de novo metastatic disease). Median (IQR) follow-up from mCRPC was 26.6 (14.2-44.7) months. Blood-based molecular testing was more common in Black men (111 men [48.7%]) than White men (317 men [36.4%]; P < .001). Rates of actionable alterations were similar between groups (65 Black men [32.8%]; 215 White men [29.1%]; P = .35), but MMRD or MSI-H was more common in Black men (18 men [9.1]) than White men (36 men [4.9%]; P = .04). PTEN alterations were less frequent in Black men than White men (31 men [15.7%] vs 194 men [26.3%]; P = .003), as were TMPRSS alterations (14 men [7.1%] vs 155 men [21.0%]; P < .001). No other differences were seen in the 15 most frequently altered genes, including TP53, AR, CDK12, RB1, and PIK3CA. Matched targeted therapy was given less frequently in Black men than White men (22 men [33.5%] vs 115 men [53.5%]; P = .008). There were no differences in response to targeted therapy or survival between the two cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of men with mCRPC found higher frequency of MMRD or MSI-H and lower frequency of PTEN and TMPRSS alterations in Black men compared with White men. Although Black men received targeted therapy less frequently than White men, no differences were observed in clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Precision Medicine , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/ethnology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Retrospective Studies , White People/genetics , Black or African American/genetics , Neoplasm Metastasis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
18.
Curr Opin Urol ; 33(6): 458-471, 2023 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37603022

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising antitumor activity in various malignant diseases. This narrative review provides an update on ongoing clinical studies investigating the only FDA-approved ICI programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab in mono- and combination therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). RECENT FINDINGS: Although most clinical trials investigating pembrolizumab as mono- or combinational therapy did not meet their primary endpoints, there exist subgroups of patients that demonstrate impressive responses rates justifying further investigation of ICI in prostate cancer. Beside combination of pembrolizumab with approved mCRPC agents, innovative approaches, like combining pembrolizumab with radioligands, deoxyribonucleic acid vaccines or innovative immunotherapeutic agents (i.e., ONC-392, AMG160, BXCL701) are ongoing exerting promising preliminary findings. SUMMARY: ICI monotherapy seems to be effective in a small biomarker-preselected population, however, there is evidence that especially novel ICI combination approaches can improve patient survival, which could ultimately refocus and revolutionize the treatment of mCRPC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
19.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 7: e2300057, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37490642

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine prognostic and predictive clinical outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) on the basis of a combination of plasma-derived genomic alterations and lipid features in a longitudinal cohort of patients with advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: A multifeature classifier was constructed to predict clinical outcomes using plasma-based genomic alterations detected in 120 genes and 772 lipidomic species as informative features in a cohort of 71 patients with mHSPC and 144 patients with mCRPC. Outcomes of interest were collected over 11 years of follow-up. These included in mHSPC state early failure of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and exceptional responders to ADT; early death (poor prognosis) and long-term survivors in mCRPC state. The approach was to build binary classification models that identified discriminative candidates with optimal weights to predict outcomes. To achieve this, we built multi-omic feature-based classifiers using traditional machine learning (ML) methods, including logistic regression with sparse regularization, multi-kernel Gaussian process regression, and support vector machines. RESULTS: The levels of specific ceramides (d18:1/14:0 and d18:1/17:0), and the presence of CHEK2 mutations, AR amplification, and RB1 deletion were identified as the most crucial factors associated with clinical outcomes. Using ML models, the optimal multi-omics feature combination determined resulted in AUC scores of 0.751 for predicting mHSPC survival and 0.638 for predicting ADT failure; and in mCRPC state, 0.687 for prognostication and 0.727 for exceptional survival. The models were observed to be superior than using a limited candidate number of features for developing multi-omic prognostic and predictive signatures. CONCLUSION: Using a ML approach that incorporates multiple omic features improves the prediction accuracy for metastatic prostate cancer outcomes significantly. Validation of these models will be needed in independent data sets in future.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Lipidomics , Multiomics , Retrospective Studies , Genomics
20.
Biochem Pharmacol ; 214: 115669, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37364622

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the most common tumor among men. Although the prognosis for early-stage prostate cancer is good, patients with advanced disease often progress to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which usually leads to death owing to resistance to existing treatments and lack of long-term effective therapy. In recent years, immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has made great progress in the treatment of various solid tumors, including prostate cancer. However, the ICIs have only shown modest outcomes in mCRPC compared with other tumors. Previous studies have suggested that the suppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of prostate cancer leads to poor anti-tumor immune response and tumor resistance to immunotherapy. It has been reported that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are capable of regulating upstream signaling at the transcriptional level, leading to a "cascade of changes" in downstream molecules. As a result, ncRNAs have been identified as an ideal class of molecules for cancer treatment. The discovery of ncRNAs provides a new perspective on TIME regulation in prostate cancer. ncRNAs have been associated with establishing an immunosuppressive microenvironment in prostate cancer through multiple pathways to modulate the immune escape of tumor cells which can promote resistance of prostate cancer to immunotherapy. Targeting these related ncRNAs presents an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Immunotherapy , Prostate/pathology , Prognosis , Tumor Microenvironment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...