Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Orthop Surg ; 13(2): 395-401, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33506615

ABSTRACT

Over the past two decades, computer assistance has revolutionalized surgery and has enabled enormous advancements in knee prosthesis surgery. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a hot topic of orthopaedic research. Reflecting population dynamics, its use continues to increase, especially in high demand populations. Therefore, efforts to achieve the best fit and precise alignment in TKA continue. Computer assistance is valuable for knee prosthesis surgeons in this regard. This manuscript investigated the use of computer assistance in knee prosthesis surgery. The effects of computer use on important facets of knee prosthesis surgery, such as precision, clinical aspects, and costs, were examined. Moreover, an overall review of the recent literature on the navigation and personalized cutting guides was conducted.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Knee Prosthesis , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Humans , Patient-Specific Modeling , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/economics
2.
Prosthet Orthot Int ; 42(3): 318-327, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29119860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In principle, lower limb bone-anchored prostheses could alleviate expenditure associated with typical socket manufacturing and residuum treatments due to socket-suspended prostheses. OBJECTIVE: This study reports (a) the incremental costs and (b) heath gain as well as (c) cost-effectiveness of bone-anchored prostheses compared to socket-suspended prostheses. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective individual case-controlled observations and systematic review. METHODS: Actual costs were extracted from financial records and completed by typical costs when needed over 6-year time horizon for a cohort of 16 individuals. Health gains corresponding to quality-adjusted life-year were calculated using health-related quality-of-life data presented in the literature. RESULTS: The provision of bone-anchored prostheses costed 21% ± 41% more but increased quality-adjusted life-years by 17% ± 5% compared to socket-suspended prostheses. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranged between -$25,700 per quality-adjusted life-year and $53,500 per quality-adjusted life-year with indicative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately $17,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Bone-anchored prosthesis was cost-saving and cost-effective for 19% and 88% of the participants, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that bone-anchored prostheses might be an acceptable alternative to socket-suspended prostheses at least from a prosthetic care perspective in Australian context. Altogether, this initial evidence-based economic evaluation provided a working approach for decision makers responsible for policies around care of individuals with lower limb amputation worldwide. Clinical relevance For the first time, this study provided evidence-based health economic benefits of lower limb bone-anchored prostheses compared to typical socket-suspended prostheses from a prosthetic care perspective that is essential to clinicians and decision makers responsible for policies.


Subject(s)
Amputees/rehabilitation , Artificial Limbs/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Osseointegration/physiology , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Suture Anchors/economics , Adult , Aged , Amputation, Surgical/methods , Case-Control Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design/economics , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Queensland , Retrospective Studies
3.
Z Orthop Unfall ; 155(1): 52-60, 2017 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27716867

ABSTRACT

Background: In total hip arthroplasty (THA), femoral head diameter has not been regarded as a key parameter which should be restored when reconstructing joint biomechanics and geometry. Apart from the controversial discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of using larger diameter heads, their higher cost is another important reason that they have only been used to a limited extent. The goal of this study was to analyse the price structure of prosthetic heads in comparison to other components used in THA. A large group of patients with hip endoprostheses were evaluated with respect to the implanted socket diameter and thus the theoretically attainable head diameter. Materials and Methods: The relative prices of various THA components (cups, inserts, stems and ball heads) distributed by two leading German manufacturers were determined and analysed. Special attention was paid to different sizes and varieties in a series of components. A large patient population treated with THA was evaluated with respect to the implanted cup diameter and therefore the theoretically attainable head diameter. Results: The pricing analysis of the THA components of two manufacturers showed identical prices for cups, inserts and stems in a series. In contrast to this, the prices for prosthetic heads with a diameter of 36-44 mm were 11-50 % higher than for 28 mm heads. Identical prices for larger heads were the exception. The distribution of the head diameter in 2719 THA cases showed significant differences between the actually implanted and the theoretically attainable heads. Conclusion: There are proven advantages in using larger diameter ball heads in THA and the remaining problems can be solved. It is therefore desirable to correct the current pricing practice of charging higher prices for larger components. Instead, identical prices should be charged for all head diameters in a series, as is currently established practice for all other THA components. Thus when reconstructing biomechanics and joint geometry in THA, it should be possible to recover not only leg length, femoral offset and antetorsion of the femoral neck, but also to approximately restore the diameter of the femoral head and thereby optimise the functional outcome.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hip Dislocation/economics , Hip Dislocation/prevention & control , Hip Prosthesis/economics , Computer Simulation , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Equipment Failure Analysis , Germany/epidemiology , Hip Prosthesis/classification , Hip Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Models, Economic , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Reoperation/economics , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
5.
HNO ; 63(12): 850-6, 2015 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the effect that doubling the standard rate for hearing aid fitting which is covered by statutory insurance has had on the size of excess payments and compliance, as well as on benefits for patients and their satisfaction. METHODS: In April 2014, 859 members of a statutory insurance scheme (hkk) who received hearing aids in the 6 months prior to the reform were questioned on the timing and financial details of their hearing aid fitting, as well as on treatment compliance and quality of the results using a standardized questionnaire. In October 2014, the same questionnaire was used to collect these data from a further 622 insurance holders who had received hearing aids in the 8 months following introduction of the new regulation. Most of the questions concerning hearing quality corresponded to those of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire. RESULTS: The project revealed a statistically significant decrease of 6 percent points in the proportion of hearing aid users who had to pay any excess whatsoever; from 80.6% to 74.1%. However, 40% of the insured persons continued to pay an excess of 1000 euros and more. The subjective hearing quality remained practically unimproved by the reform and was statistically, almost without exception, independent of whether hearing aid users wore expensive devices associated with a large excess, or devices available at the standard rate. Finally, the study confirmed a previously recognized usage pattern characterized by noncompliance. For example, approximately 40% of hearing aid users did not wear their device in the everyday environment. This observation was independent of the size of the excess and the timing of the most recent visit to the hearing aid acoustician. CONCLUSION: Despite doubling of the standard rate, three quarters of patients pay an excess--sometimes a substantial one. The subjective hearing quality was not improved by doubling the standard rate; the majority of patients continue to complain of considerable problems with hearing in difficult situations (environments with background or reverberant noise). Satisfaction with hearing quality is neither dependent on the doubling of the standard rate, nor on whether or not an excess was paid. Compliance may possibly be improved by structured follow-up, which should involve the prescribing otorhinolaryngologists, as well as phoniatrists, pedaudiologists, and hearing aid acousticians.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Guideline Adherence/economics , Hearing Aids/economics , Hearing Loss/economics , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , National Health Programs/economics , Aged , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Aids/standards , Hearing Aids/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Humans , Male , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Prosthesis Fitting/standards
6.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 473(9): 2848-55, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26028596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Personal protection equipment, improved early medical care, and rapid extraction of the casualty have resulted in more injured service members who served in Afghanistan surviving after severe military trauma. Many of those who survive the initial trauma are faced with complex wounds such as multiple amputations. Although costs of care can be high, they have not been well quantified before. This is required to budget for the needs of the injured beyond their service in the armed forces. QUESTION/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to quantify and describe the extent and nature of traumatic amputations of British service personnel from Afghanistan; and (2) to calculate an estimate of the projected long-term cost of this cohort. METHODS: A four-stage methodology was used: (1) systematic literature search of previous studies of amputee care cost; (2) retrospective analysis of the UK Joint Theatre Trauma and prosthetic database; (3) Markov economic algorithm for healthcare cost and sensitivity analysis of results; and (4) statistical cost comparison between our cohort and the identified literature. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2014, 265 casualties sustained 416 amputations. The average number of limbs lost per casualty was 1.6. The most common type of amputation was a transfemoral amputation (153 patients); the next most common amputation type was unilateral transtibial (143 patients). Using a Markov model of healthcare economics, it is estimated that the total 40-year cost of the UK Afghanistan lower limb amputee cohort is £288 million (USD 444 million); this figure estimates cost of trauma care, rehabilitation, and prosthetic costs. A sensitivity analysis on our model demonstrated a potential ± 6.19% variation in costs. CONCLUSIONS: The conflict in Afghanistan resulted in high numbers of complex injuries. Our findings suggest that a long-term facility to budget for veterans' health care is necessary. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Estimates here should be taken as the start of a challenge to develop sustained rehabilitation and recovery funding and provision.


Subject(s)
Afghan Campaign 2001- , Amputation, Surgical/economics , Amputation, Surgical/rehabilitation , Amputees/rehabilitation , Health Care Costs , Long-Term Care/economics , Military Medicine/economics , Military Personnel , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Algorithms , Artificial Limbs/economics , Databases, Factual , Humans , Markov Chains , Models, Economic , Models, Statistical , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
7.
J Rehabil Res Dev ; 51(1): 101-10, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24805897

ABSTRACT

This study investigated a low-cost and low-skill dependent pressure casting technique (PCAST) to fabricate and fit transtibial (TT) prosthetic sockets in a developing country. Thirteen adult volunteers (average age 47 yr) with unilateral TT amputation participated. After fitting, five participants were lost to follow-up (four rejected the prosthesis and one died). The eight remaining participants used the prosthesis for an average of 167 +/- 1 d and indicated regular use throughout this period. Success was evaluated by measures of satisfaction (Satisfaction with Prosthesis Questionnaire [SATPRO]), physical function, and gait recorded after fitting and following the usage period. SATPRO results showed high levels of satisfaction on both occasions. After the usage period, the timed up-and-go and six-minute walk performances increased by 1.7 +/- 2.0 s and 60 +/- 29 m (p = 0.001), respectively, whereas gait speed, cadence, step and stride length, support base, and percent gait cycle times remained unchanged. The results show that a TT PCAST socket (with some minor modifications) was successfully fitted to eight of the participants (success rate of 62%). It is reasonable to conclude that this technique may assist people with TT amputation in a developing country where there is a lack of trained personnel. Importantly, this technique may reduce TT prosthetic costs and increase fitting opportunity in a developing country.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/rehabilitation , Artificial Limbs/economics , Gait , Prosthesis Design/economics , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Adult , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Satisfaction , Population Surveillance , Recovery of Function , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tibia/surgery
9.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 37(5): 414-7, 2012 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22392268

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively evaluated the costs/frequency of explanted instrumentation (devices implanted but removed prior to closure) for all single-level anterior diskectomy (1-ADF) procedures performed in 2010 at a single institution before and after surgeon education. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgeon education would reduce the costs/frequency of explantation for 1-ADF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In 2009, we reported that the cost of explanted devices was 9.2% of the cost of implanted devices. METHODS: The costs/frequencies of explantation for 1-ADF performed in 2010 at the same institution by the same surgeons were analyzed before and after surgeon education. From January through April, surgeons were unaware of concerns regarding explantation. At the end of April 2010, spinal surgeons were educated about explantation costs/frequency at 2 meetings. Explantation costs/frequencies for the first 4 months of 2010 were compared with those for the last 8 months as well as with the results from 2009. RESULTS: Prior to surgeon education, instrumentation was explanted in 45.5% of the cases, whereas after education explantation occurred in 16% of the cases. The explantation rate (the number of explanted devices as a percentage of implanted devices) was lower after education for screws (12.5% vs. 7.7%), plates (9.4% vs. 0%), and allograft spacers (7.1% vs. 2.9%), and lower than for rates from 2009. In 2010, the overall cost of explanted devices as a percentage of implanted devices was also lower after surgeon education (5.8%) than before surgeon education in 2010 (20.0%) or 2009 (9.2%). CONCLUSION: The frequency and cost of explanted instrumentation used to perform 1-ADF were reduced through surgeon education.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy/economics , Diskectomy/education , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Spinal Fusion/economics , Spinal Fusion/education , Spondylosis/surgery , Bone Plates/economics , Bone Screws/economics , Cost Savings/economics , Cost Savings/methods , Diskectomy/instrumentation , Education, Medical, Continuing/economics , Education, Medical, Continuing/trends , Health Care Costs/trends , Humans , Internal Fixators/economics , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/economics , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Implantation/economics , Prosthesis Implantation/education , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spondylosis/economics
10.
Prosthet Orthot Int ; 35(1): 76-80, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21515892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Using the new modular socket system (MSS) to produce a prosthetic socket directly on the patient has the potential of being easier and quicker to manufacture but also incurring higher costs. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to compare the costs of manufacturing a transtibial prosthetic socket using either a MSS or a standard laminated socket (PC). STUDY DESIGN: Concurrent controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 20 patients at two orthopaedic facilities were followed with regards to the cost of manufacturing a prosthetic socket using either MSS or PC. Time aspects and material costs were considered in the cost analysis. Other factors studied include delivery time and number of visits. For the cost analysis, only direct costs pertaining to the prosthetic socket were considered. RESULTS: The total cost of MSS was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.01) compared to PC. However, the production and time cost was significantly lower. Delivery time to the patient was 1 day for MSS compared to 17 days for PC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the direct prosthetic cost of treating a patient using MSS is significantly higher than treating a patient using PC. However, the MSS prosthesis can be delivered significantly faster and with fewer visits. Further studies taking the full societal costs of MSS into account should therefore be performed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study shows that the direct prosthetic cost of treating a patient with Modular Socket System is significantly higher than treating a patient with plastercasting with standard laminated socket. However, the Modular Socket System prosthesis can be delivered significantly faster and with fewer visits.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/economics , Amputation, Surgical/rehabilitation , Artificial Limbs/economics , Prosthesis Design/economics , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Casts, Surgical , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design/methods , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Silicones , Sweden , Tibia
11.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 40(11 Suppl): 9-12, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22263216

ABSTRACT

Individual physicians are challenged to decrease their operating costs at the same time they are expected to reduce complication rates. For the orthopedic surgeon who performs total knee arthroplasty (TKA), one way to address operating costs is to increase efficiency in the operating room. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has not delivered efficiency the way it was once hoped. Customized patient instrumentation (CPI) takes advantage of computer-based technology but, unlike CAS, does not increase surgical time, does not require a computer in the operating room, and allows critical alignment decisions to be made before entering the operating room. In this article, the preoperative preferences and intraoperative techniques in using CPI technology are described. Keeping in mind key components of the intraoperative technique when using CPI, such as soft tissue removal, especially at cutting block contact points, will ensure successful procedures for both the surgeon and patient.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Intraoperative Care/methods , Knee Prosthesis , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Efficiency, Organizational/economics , Humans , Intraoperative Care/economics , Patient-Centered Care/economics , Practice Management, Medical , Preoperative Care/economics , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , United States
12.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 40(11 Suppl): 13-6, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22263217

ABSTRACT

Because of the significant risks associated with component malalignment, considerable resources are being utilized to develop technology to improve alignment and decrease outliers in knee replacement surgery. While computer-assisted surgery is more accurate and allows for decreased outliers when compared to traditional instrumentation, it is not a technology that can be utilized by all surgeons who perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to increased operative times and cost. Recently, the creation and use of patient-customized cutting guides has been applied to TKA. Published studies and results from practice have shown customized patient instrumentation technology to have comparable or better implant alignment than traditional instrumentation and increased efficiency with regard to surgical preparation time, the amount of surgical instrumentation needed, and cost savings. For lower-volume/inexperienced surgeons, these advantages can be significant.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Knee Prosthesis , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Bone Malalignment/prevention & control , Humans , Patient-Centered Care/economics , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prosthesis Fitting/economics
14.
Disabil Rehabil ; 29(11-12): 863-72, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17577721

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three alignment systems based on two alignment theories that can be utilized in the fabrication of monolimb prostheses that have acceptable alignment. A second goal was to assess the feasibility of technology transfer for providing prosthetic services to remote areas of landmine-affected countries. METHOD: Five prosthetists and five healthy transtibial amputees participated in the study. Each prosthetist was trained and then used each of the three systems to capture alignment measurements for one subject. Three monolimbs identified as X, Y and Z were fabricated for each subject and assessed during clinical static and dynamic gait conditions. Training materials and methods were also evaluated. RESULTS: All three systems captured acceptable alignments fairly well, although the two systems that incorporated weight-bearing into the alignment process had slightly better outcomes. Each system has its own advantages in terms of ease of use, required equipment, and ease of technology transfer. CONCLUSION: All three systems have the potential for application in outreach prosthetic services and warrant continued evaluation. Minor changes need to be incorporated into the alignment systems and procedures to make them easier to use and more effective.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Artificial Limbs , International Cooperation , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Technology Transfer , Adult , Blast Injuries/rehabilitation , Cost Control , Developing Countries , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gait , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , United States
17.
Prosthet Orthot Int ; 28(2): 115-20, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15382805

ABSTRACT

The ICEX system (Ossur, Iceland), allows a socket to be manufactured directly onto the stump and is thought to provide improved comfort due to better pressure distribution whilst being easier to fit and manufacture. The aims of this project were to a) compare gait performance by measuring several gait characteristics, b) compare production and fitting times, c) investigate financial implications and d) attempt to gauge the amputees' subjective opinions of socket comfort. A randomised, controlled trial was conducted on 27 trans-tibial amputees with an existing patellar tendon bearing (PTB) socket on the Endolite system (Chas A. Blatchford, UK). Twenty one (21) subjects completed the study. Of these, 10 in the control group received new PTB sockets while 11 in the experimental group received ICEX. Gait analysis wearing existing sockets was performed and kinetic data obtained from a force plate. This was repeated with the new sockets after a 6 week period of adjustment. Mann-Whitney tests were used in statistical evaluations with a significance level of 5%. Subjects were asked to score their prosthesis for comfort using the Socket Comfort Score (Hanspal et al., 2003) and the frequency of visits for socket adjustments over a three-month period post-delivery of the sockets was recorded. This study demonstrates no significant difference in any of the gait parameters measured. Though the time required to manufacture a PTB prosthesis was found to be considerably longer than the ICEX, the overall cost for producing the ICEX was significantly greater. Subjects showed only minor comfort preference for the ICEX design and there was no significant difference in the mean number of visits for socket adjustments. In view of the considerable additional cost of providing ICEX and the lack of evidence of improvement in any parameter tested, the routine provision of ICEX prostheses to unselected trans-tibial amputees cannot be recommended.


Subject(s)
Artificial Limbs/economics , Direct Service Costs , Gait/physiology , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Amputation Stumps/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Leg , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prosthesis Design , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...