Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 69
Filter
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 30(6): 1057-1060, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32303842

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the sagittal starting point and entry angle necessary for anatomic reduction in proximal tibial fractures and to compare reductions obtained using a standard versus modified sagittal entry angle. METHODS: Extra-articular proximal tibial fracture sawbone models were divided into three groups. The first group was used to determine the sagittal starting point and entry angle necessary for an anatomic reduction by inserting nails into the distal fragment and then reducing the proximal fragment over the nail. The second and third groups had nails inserted through the standard coronal and sagittal starting point using the standard sagittal entry angle (parallel to the anterior cortex) versus a more posteriorly directed modified sagittal entry angle (directed at the center of the tibia at the level of the tibia tubercle prominence). Fracture gapping and translation in the sagittal plane were measured for each group. RESULTS: Anatomic reduction was only possible with a sagittal starting point that was too posterior for actual use. The standard sagittal entry angle resulted in greater posterior fracture translation and less anterior fracture gapping then the modified sagittal entry angle, 10.6 ± 1.1 versus 1.6 ± 2.8 mm (p < 0.01) and 1.3 ± 0.5 versus 5.3 ± 2.5 mm (p = 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Anatomic reduction was not achieved with the standard sagittal starting point and entry angle. Considering these finding, surgeons should have a low threshold to utilize adjunct reduction methods for these injuries.


Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prosthesis Fitting , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Fluoroscopy/methods , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Humans , Materials Testing , Models, Anatomic , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Prosthesis Fitting/standards
2.
Am J Audiol ; 28(4): 877-894, 2019 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600460

ABSTRACT

Purpose This study examined the current pediatric amplification practice with an emphasis on hearing aid verification using probe microphone measurement (PMM), among audiologists in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Frequency of practice, access to PMM system, practiced protocols, barriers, and perception toward the benefits of PMM were identified through a survey. Method A questionnaire was distributed to and filled in by the audiologists who provided pediatric amplification service in Klang Valley, Malaysia. One hundred eight (N = 108) audiologists, composed of 90.3% women and 9.7% men (age range: 23-48 years), participated in the survey. Results PMM was not a clinical routine practiced by a majority of the audiologists, despite its recognition as the best clinical practice that should be incorporated into protocols for fitting hearing aids in children. Variations in practice existed warranting further steps to improve the current practice for children with hearing impairment. The lack of access to PMM equipment was 1 major barrier for the audiologists to practice real-ear verification. Practitioners' characteristics such as time constraints, low confidence, and knowledge levels were also identified as barriers that impede the uptake of the evidence-based practice. Conclusions The implementation of PMM in clinical practice remains a challenge to the audiology profession. A knowledge-transfer approach that takes into consideration the barriers and involves effective collaboration or engagement between the knowledge providers and potential stakeholders is required to promote the clinical application of evidence-based best practice.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Adult , Audiology/methods , Audiology/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Forecasting , Hearing Aids/trends , Hearing Loss/therapy , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Prosthesis Fitting/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
JBJS Case Connect ; 9(2): e0254, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31211748

ABSTRACT

CASE: Gollop-Wolfgang Complex (GWC) includes congenital absence of the tibia with ipsilateral distal femur bifurcation associated with hand/foot ectrodactyly. A 20-month-old male presented with GWC, including left bifid distal femur with ipsilateral tibial hemimelia and absent extensor mechanism, hypoplastic bilateral thumbs, and right foot tarsal-type preaxial polydactyly. Left through-knee amputation preserving growth and contralateral polydactyly reconstruction were performed. Complications of wound infection and dehiscence were successfully treated. Patient is 44 months old and ambulating with left knee disarticulation prosthesis and right supramalleolar orthosis. CONCLUSIONS: Through-knee amputation and prosthetic fitting provides limb function for GWC patients with tibial hemimelia lacking an extensor mechanism.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/surgery , Disarticulation/methods , Ectromelia/surgery , Femur/abnormalities , Hand Deformities, Congenital/surgery , Lower Extremity/surgery , Tibia/abnormalities , Abnormalities, Multiple/diagnostic imaging , Black or African American , Aftercare , Ectromelia/diagnostic imaging , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Foot Orthoses/standards , Hand Deformities, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Lower Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Male , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Radiography , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/surgery , Treatment Outcome
4.
Work ; 63(1): 125-135, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31127750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The main function of respiratory protective devices is to provide an intact physical barrier between the environment and the user. To ensure that, a leak-tight fit of the facepiece to the user's face is essential, regardless of the user's individual facial features. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to assess the possibilities of developing customized respirators well-fitting to the anthropometric dimensions of the user's face using 3D scanning and 3D printing techniques and to evaluate this custom-made device in terms of protective, usage and strength parameters. METHODS: Commercially available twin-filter half-mask type MP22/2 was selected as base model for customization. The 3D scans of the half-mask facepiece were performed using ATOS Core optical 3D scanner. Simultaneously anthropometric measurements of the test subject face were carried out with hand-held 3D scanner Artec EVA. Then digital model of the facepiece was matched to the shape of user's face using Geomagic Touch X haptic device. Customized facepieces were printed out with use of selective laser sintering technique from thermoplastic polyurethane. After assembling, respirators were tested for compliance with the requirements of the European standards. RESULTS: The developed respirators proved to be very well-fitted to the user's face, did not cause any imprints or skin irritations and were assessed positively in terms of protective, usage and strength parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The application of 3D scanning and 3D printing techniques for designing and fabricating customized half-mask facepieces constitutes a viable option for the future development of respiratory protective devices.


Subject(s)
Face/abnormalities , Masks/standards , Prosthesis Design/standards , Anthropometry/methods , Equipment Design/methods , Equipment Design/standards , Face/physiopathology , Humans , Pilot Projects , Printing, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Printing, Three-Dimensional/trends , Prosthesis Design/methods , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Respiratory Protective Devices/adverse effects , Respiratory Protective Devices/standards
5.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 34(2): 423­433, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30282085

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the mandibular incisive canal (MIC) studies using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PROSPERO-registered systematic review (#42017056619) was conducted following the PRISMA statements to summarize current knowledge on the CBCT aspects of the MIC. A search was performed in PubMed's Medline and Scopus databases, without date or language restrictions, using the algorithm {[(Interforaminal region) OR (mandibular incisive channel) OR (mandibular incisive nerve) OR (mental mandible) OR (anterior mandible) (cone beam computed tomography). Also, the references were crosschecked. The Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument and meta-analysis was used to evaluate the selected studies. RESULTS: A total of 410 articles were found, and 25 studies were selected after a two-step selection process. The CBCT systems differed regarding field of view (FOV) (large, n = 3; medium, n = 2; small, n = 4; not informed, n = 16) and voxel size (0.15 to 0.4 mm). Geographically, the studies were distributed across four continents (South America, North America, Asia, and Europe), and there was a statistical significance of studies from the American and Asian continents (P < .0001). From 3,421 CBCT exams, the number of female patients was slightly higher than male, and the mean age ranged from 29.8 to 59.1 years. The overall mean prevalence of MIC was 89.6% ± 15.08%, and bilateral occurrence was statistically significant (P < .0001). The studies using a voxel size lower than 0.3 mm showed the highest mean prevalence (93.88%) in comparison with voxel size described as ≥ 0.3 mm (89.33%). Diameter (0.45 to 4.12 mm) and length (6.6 to 40.3 mm) showed great variability among the included studies. CONCLUSION: In summary, the results of this systematic review evidenced a high worldwide prevalence of MIC. There was no prevalence of MIC in relation to sex, and its presence was mainly related to adults between the fourth and sixth decades of life. In addition, great heterogeneity of methodologies was observed.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Dental Abutments/standards , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Dental Prosthesis Design/methods , Dental Prosthesis Design/standards , Humans , Zirconium
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(7): e9907, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29443765

ABSTRACT

The trajectory of the pedicle screw perpendicular to the SAP (superior articular process) is consistent with the universal trajectory presented in the previous study of the entry point using computed tomography. The ideal entry point and trajectory of pedicle screw insertion have been a matter of considerable debate. We attempted to find the relationship between SAP and entry point and trajectory of the pedicle screw.Thoracic spine CT (computed tomography) scans of 9 volunteers were studied. A safe zone for the trajectory of the screw in the axial (MarginAx) and sagittal (MarginSag) was defined as the zone between lines perpendicular to the SAP along the medial and lateral cortex of the pedicle in the axial section, and the superior and inferior cortex in the sagittal section without violation of the pedicle walls. The midline of MarginAx and MarginSag was defined as the safe entry point of the trajectory in the axial and sagittal planes (TrajectoryAx and TrajectorySag), respectively.MarginAx and MarginSag were 4.14 ±â€Š0.99 and 9.03 ±â€Š2.01 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in TrajectoryAx between the upper and middle, and between the upper and lower (P = .0076 in both cases), but not between the middle and lower thoracic spine (P = .066). TrajectorySag was within 1 mm at the levels of T4, T8, T11 vertebrae and at 0 mm at the other levels. Thus, the midpoint of MarginSag was within 1 mm from the SAP base.There was a constant angular relationship with the SAP and the pedicle axis; the line perpendicular to the SAP can act as a trajectory. Therefore, we suggest that the SAP might be the only accurate and safe reference for pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic spine perpendicular to the SAP using freehand technique.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Spinal Fusion , Thoracic Vertebrae , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pedicle Screws , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prosthesis Failure/etiology , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Republic of Korea , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/methods , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
7.
Science ; 356(6344): 1280-1284, 2017 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28642437

ABSTRACT

Exoskeletons and active prostheses promise to enhance human mobility, but few have succeeded. Optimizing device characteristics on the basis of measured human performance could lead to improved designs. We have developed a method for identifying the exoskeleton assistance that minimizes human energy cost during walking. Optimized torque patterns from an exoskeleton worn on one ankle reduced metabolic energy consumption by 24.2 ± 7.4% compared to no torque. The approach was effective with exoskeletons worn on one or both ankles, during a variety of walking conditions, during running, and when optimizing muscle activity. Finding a good generic assistance pattern, customizing it to individual needs, and helping users learn to take advantage of the device all contributed to improved economy. Optimization methods with these features can substantially improve performance.


Subject(s)
Ankle , Exoskeleton Device/standards , Models, Biological , Prosthesis Fitting/instrumentation , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Walking/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Energy Metabolism , Humans , Machine Learning , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Torque
8.
PLoS One ; 11(12): e0167466, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27923050

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic alignment, positioning of a prosthetic foot relative to a socket, is an iterative process in which an amputee's gait is optimized through repetitive optical gait observation and induction of alignment adjustments when deviations are detected in spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters. An important limitation of the current prosthetic alignment approach is the subjectivity and the lack of standardized quantifiable baseline values. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate if an optimal alignment criterion can be derived from published articles. Moreover, we investigated the effect of alignment changes on spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic gait parameters. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included, two controlled before-and-after studies and nine-interrupted time series studies. DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that alignment changes have a predictable influence on the included kinetic parameters. However, the effect of alignment changes on spatio-temporal and kinematic gait parameters are generally unpredictable. These findings suggest that it is imperative to include kinetics in the process of dynamic prosthetic alignment. Partially this can be established by communication with the prosthetic user in terms of perceived socket comfort, but the use of measurement tools should also be considered. While current literature is not conclusive about an optimal alignment, future alignment research should focus on alignment optimisation based on kinetic outcomes.


Subject(s)
Gait/physiology , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Range of Motion, Articular , Amputees , Artificial Limbs , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Tibia
10.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 31(5): 1023-9, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27632256

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Misfit is a risk factor for rehabilitation with implants, and its detection is of fundamental importance to the success of treatment with implants. The use of appropriate radiographic imaging is key for a good prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of film and digital radiographs for the detection of misfit at the implant-abutment interface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital and conventional (manual and automatic processing) radiography was performed in seven test specimens, each one with a different vertical misfit between the abutment and the platform of the implant. Scanning electron microscopy was used to confirm the misfit and to measure it. Five dental radiologists independently and blindly evaluated the images. Cohen's kappa with linear weighting was calculated to determine interexaminer and intraexaminer concordance. Statistical analyses were performed using the Cochran's Q test and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). RESULTS: Interexaminer analysis showed that the kappa value was equal to 0.74, whereas the average kappa value in the intraexaminer evaluation was 0.90. Digital imaging showed the largest area on the ROC graph, and conventional images with manual processing showed the smallest area. The images obtained through conventional radiography with both manual and automatic processing showed statistically significant differences from the measurement of the gold standard (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Digital imaging can be used to evaluate misfit at the implant-abutment interface. Conventional systems of radiographic imaging do not provide sufficient information to evaluate misfit at the implant-abutment interface.


Subject(s)
Bone-Implant Interface/diagnostic imaging , Dental Abutments , Dental Implants , Dental Restoration Failure , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Radiography, Dental/methods , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Radiography, Dental/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 27(3): 188-203, 2016 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26967361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines and protocols for pediatric hearing aid fitting are necessary to meet the goals of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs. The American Academy of Audiology published an update to their Pediatric Amplification Guideline in 2013. Ontario's Infant Hearing Program (IHP) offers specific protocols that aim to fulfill recommended guidelines. It has recently been updated to align with the American Academy of Audiology Guideline and other evidence. PURPOSE: A summary of the updates to the Ontario IHP's Amplification Protocol is described. In addition, data illustrating hearing-related outcomes of the program are offered. RESEARCH DESIGN: The updated Ontario protocol is based on evidence, wherever possible. Where research is not yet available, clinical decision support has been described in a systematic way. Outcomes of the Ontario IHP were obtained through a longitudinal clinical observation study. STUDY SAMPLE: One hundred and fifteen children with hearing loss, who wore hearing aids, were included in the outcome analyses (mean = 28.6 mo; range = 1.3-115.3 mo). Hearing losses ranged from mild to profound, unilateral or bilateral sensorineural (pure-tone average = 52.3 dB HL). They were recruited from four IHP clinics within Ontario. Children with complexities in addition to hearing loss were included. INTERVENTION: The children were fitted with hearing aids following Ontario's Amplification Protocol. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSES: During routine clinical appointments, IHP Audiologists administered questionnaires to the parents of their pediatric patients using a systematic outcome measurement protocol (University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol). Hearing aid fitting details (e.g., speech intelligibility index) were also gathered to describe the quality of the hearing aid fittings in relation to the functional outcomes. Regression analyses were conducted to characterize scores on the questionnaires and the impact of important variables. Children with complexities were analyzed separately from those who were typically developing. RESULTS: Important updates to Ontario's Amplification Protocol offer new details about candidacy considerations as well as technical updates. Outcomes from the IHP reveal protocol elements can be executed clinically and when they are, typically developing children who wear hearing aids are meeting auditory development and performance milestones. CONCLUSIONS: Updates to Ontario's Amplification Protocol are necessary to support the evolution of EHDI programs and the evidence which sustains them. With advances in technology and additional research, pediatric hearing aid fitting will continue to progress and support systematic measurement of outcomes for children who wear hearing aids. The application of state-of-the-art hearing aid fitting practices to the pediatric population within EHDI programs supports good outcomes for infants and children with hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Audiology , Hearing Aids , Pediatrics , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Academies and Institutes , Hearing Loss/therapy , Hearing Tests , Humans , Infant , Ontario , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States
12.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 27(3): 204-218, 2016 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26967362

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Up to 15% of children with permanent hearing loss (HL) have auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD), which involves normal outer hair cell function and disordered afferent neural activity in the auditory nerve or brainstem. Given the varying presentations of ANSD in children, there is a need for more evidence-based research on appropriate clinical interventions for this population. PURPOSE: This study compared the speech production, speech perception, and language outcomes of children with ANSD, who are hard of hearing, to children with similar degrees of mild-to-moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), all of whom were fitted with bilateral hearing aids (HAs) based on the American Academy of Audiology pediatric amplification guidelines. RESEARCH DESIGN: Speech perception and communication outcomes data were gathered in a prospective accelerated longitudinal design, with entry into the study between six mo and seven yr of age. Three sites were involved in participant recruitment: Boys Town National Research Hospital, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the University of Iowa. STUDY SAMPLE: The sample consisted of 12 children with ANSD and 22 children with SNHL. The groups were matched based on better-ear pure-tone average, better-ear aided speech intelligibility index, gender, maternal education level, and newborn hearing screening result (i.e., pass or refer). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Children and their families participated in an initial baseline visit, followed by visits twice a year for children <2 yr of age and once a yr for children >2 yr of age. Paired-sample t-tests were used to compare children with ANSD to children with SNHL. RESULTS: Paired t-tests indicated no significant differences between the ANSD and SNHL groups on language and articulation measures. Children with ANSD displayed functional speech perception skills in quiet. Although the number of participants was too small to conduct statistical analyses for speech perception testing, there appeared to be a trend in which the ANSD group performed more poorly in background noise with HAs, compared to the SNHL group. CONCLUSIONS: The American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guidelines recommend that children with ANSD receive an HA trial if their behavioral thresholds are sufficiently high enough to impede speech perception at conversational levels. For children with ANSD in the mild-to-severe HL range, the current results support this recommendation, as children with ANSD can achieve functional outcomes similar to peers with SNHL.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Central/therapy , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Speech Perception , Academies and Institutes , Audiology , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Language , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Pediatrics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , United States
13.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 27(3): 219-236, 2016 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26967363

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines for fitting hearing aids for children are well developed and have strong basis in evidence, specific protocols for fitting and verifying technologies can supplement such guidelines. One such technology is frequency-lowering signal processing. Children require access to a broad bandwidth of speech to detect and use all phonemes including female /s/. When access through conventional amplification is not possible, the use of frequency-lowering signal processing may be considered as a means to overcome limitations. Fitting and verification protocols are needed to better define candidacy determination and options for assessing and fine tuning frequency-lowering signal processing for individuals. PURPOSE: This work aims to (1) describe a set of calibrated phonemes that can be used to characterize the variation in different brands of frequency-lowering processors in hearing aids and the verification with these signals and (2) determine whether verification with these signal are predictive of perceptual changes associated with changes in the strength of frequency-lowering signal processing. Finally, we aimed to develop a fitting protocol for use in pediatric clinical practice. STUDY SAMPLE: Study 1 used a sample of six hearing aids spanning four types of frequency lowering algorithms for an electroacoustic evaluation. Study 2 included 21 adults who had hearing loss (mean age 66 yr). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Simulated fricatives were designed to mimic the level and frequency shape of female fricatives extracted from two sources of speech. These signals were used to verify the frequency-lowering effects of four distinct types of frequency-lowering signal processors available in commercial hearing aids, and verification measures were compared to extracted fricatives made in a reference system. In a second study, the simulated fricatives were used within a probe microphone measurement system to verify a wide range of frequency compression settings in a commercial hearing aid, and 27 adult listeners were tested at each setting. The relation between the hearing aid verification measures and the listener's ability to detect and discriminate between fricatives was examined. RESULTS: Verification measures made with the simulated fricatives agreed to within 4 dB, on average, and tended to mimic the frequency response shape of fricatives presented in a running speech context. Some processors showed a greater aided response level for fricatives in running speech than fricatives presented in isolation. Results with listeners indicated that verified settings that provided a positive sensation level of /s/ and that maximized the frequency difference between /s/ and /∫/ tended to have the best performance. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency-lowering signal processors have measureable effects on the high-frequency fricative content of speech, particularly female /s/. It is possible to measure these effects either with a simple strategy that presents an isolated simulated fricative and measures the aided frequency response or with a more complex system that extracts fricatives from running speech. For some processors, a more accurate result may be achieved with a running speech system. In listeners, the aided frequency location and sensation level of fricatives may be helpful in predicting whether a specific hearing aid fitting, with or without frequency-lowering, will support access to the fricatives of speech.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids/standards , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Speech Perception , Academies and Institutes , Acoustics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiology , Calibration , Child , Female , Hearing Loss/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pediatrics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States
14.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 27(3): 237-251, 2016 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26967364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines for fitting hearing aids for children are well developed and have strong basis in evidence, specific protocols for fitting and verifying some technologies are not always available. One such technology is noise management in children's hearing aids. Children are frequently in high-level and/or noisy environments, and many options for noise management exist in modern hearing aids. Verification protocols are needed to define specific test signals and levels for use in clinical practice. PURPOSE: This work aims to (1) describe the variation in different brands of noise reduction processors in hearing aids and the verification of these processors and (2) determine whether these differences are perceived by 13 children who have hearing loss. Finally, we aimed to develop a verification protocol for use in pediatric clinical practice. STUDY SAMPLE: A set of hearing aids was tested using both clinically available test systems and a reference system, so that the impacts of noise reduction signal processing in hearing aids could be characterized for speech in a variety of background noises. A second set of hearing aids was tested across a range of audiograms and across two clinical verification systems to characterize the variance in clinical verification measurements. Finally, a set of hearing aid recordings that varied by type of noise reduction was rated for sound quality by children with hearing loss. RESULTS: Significant variation across makes and models of hearing aids was observed in both the speed of noise reduction activation and the magnitude of noise reduction. Reference measures indicate that noise-only testing may overestimate noise reduction magnitude compared to speech-in-noise testing. Variation across clinical test signals was also observed, indicating that some test signals may be more successful than others for characterization of hearing aid noise reduction. Children provided different sound quality ratings across hearing aids, and for one hearing aid rated the sound quality as higher with the noise reduction system activated. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for clinical verification systems may be that greater standardization and the use of speech-in-noise test signals may improve the quality and consistency of noise reduction verification cross clinics. A suggested clinical protocol for verification of noise management in children's hearing aids is suggested.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids/standards , Noise , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Adolescent , Audiology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Pediatrics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Speech Perception , United States , Young Adult
15.
Optom Vis Sci ; 93(3): 300-4, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26760582

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study examines the accuracy of neophyte clinicians' assessments of central corneal clearance (CCC) of a corneoscleral lens using lens center thickness (CT) as a biometric scale. METHODS: A normal participant was fit with a corneoscleral lens on both eyes. Observers (n = 34) from the final semester of their fourth year in optometric clinical training were instructed to estimate the amount of CCC through the approximate geometrical center of the lens using a standardized script which included a photograph identifying various zones. Observer estimates were then compared against anterior segment-OCT (AS-OCT) values obtained during calibration. RESULTS: Mean observer estimates of central corneal clearances were OD 220.5 ± 121.microns (range 50 to 480 microns) and OS 398.0 ± 159.1 microns (range 140 to 800 microns). The mean AS-OCT values were OD 105.5 ± 11.microns (range 84 to 121 microns) and OS 340.8 ± 15.2 microns (range 315 to 362 microns). Mann-Whitney test was statistically significant for comparison of median values OD (177.0; p = 0.001) and OS (260.0; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Neophyte clinicians in the final semester of their fourth year of optometric clinical training tend to significantly overestimate the amount of CCC in a normal subject with declining accuracy as the amount of clearance diminishes.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship/standards , Contact Lenses , Cornea/anatomy & histology , Optometry/education , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Sclera/anatomy & histology , Adult , Biometry , Corneal Topography , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Refractive Errors/rehabilitation
16.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 43(3): 217-28, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26654157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The methods to evaluate the efficacy of the adjusted hearing aid for a hearing-impaired person are fitting tests. The tests include those presently carried out for evaluating hearing aid fitting, and the methods of testing and evaluation have been published as "Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010)" by the Japan Audiological Society. METHODS: Guidelines for the following 8 test methods are presented. (1) Measurements of speech performance-intensity functions and speech recognition scores; (2) Assessment of hearing aid fitting from the aspect of tolerance of environmental noise; (3) Measurement of real-ear insertion gain (measurement of sound pressure levels at the eardrum); (4) Measurement of the hearing threshold level and the uncomfortable loudness level (UCL) in sound pressure level (SPL) with an inserted earphone; (5) Aided threshold test in a sound field (functional gain measurement); (6) Prediction of insertion gain and aided threshold from hearing aid characteristics and the pure tone audiogram; (7) Measurement of speech recognition in noise; (8) Assessment of hearing aid fitting using questionnaires. In the above tests, (1) and (2) are mandatory tests, and (3) to (8) are informative tests. RESULTS: By performing test combinations properly selected from the above 8 tests, the benefits of a hearing aid could be determined. CONCLUSION: The above test methods were useful and valuable in determining the efficacy of the adjusted hearing aid for a hearing-impaired person during clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Audiology , Auditory Threshold , Humans , Japan , Noise , Societies, Scientific , Speech Reception Threshold Test
17.
Z Orthop Unfall ; 153(6): 630-5, 2015 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After complex trauma of the foot, patients frequently need orthotic care. There have been no systematic studies on the quality of care or patient satisfaction. Therefore the goal of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and the quality of orthotic care. PATIENT AND METHODS: In a prospective non-randomized, cross-sectional intervention study, the quality of care and patient satisfaction with orthotic devices were evaluated clinically and pedographically. This was followed by a lengthy discussion and recommendation to improve the insoles or shoes. These improvements were followed up by a written/telephone survey. 39 of the 50 recruited patients with complex trauma of the foot (78 %) were supplied with orthotic devices (insoles, modifications of the sole and orthopaedic shoes). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Most patients (76 %) were content with their orthotic care. However, shortcomings were noted in 20 patients. These were: insufficient arch support/stabilization, inadequate support of roll-off and unsatisfactory unloading of the forefoot. 23 % of the patients did not use their orthotic devices. Compliance increased after counseling. However, half of the patients had problems in obtaining reimbursement for the modifications recommended. In conclusion, orthotic treatment of patients after complex trauma of the foot is demanding. Modifications of the devices are frequently needed. Interprofessional collaboration plays an important role.


Subject(s)
Foot Injuries/diagnosis , Foot Injuries/rehabilitation , Foot Orthoses/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Prosthesis Fitting/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Foot Orthoses/standards , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma , Prevalence , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Recovery of Function , Young Adult
18.
HNO ; 63(12): 850-6, 2015 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the effect that doubling the standard rate for hearing aid fitting which is covered by statutory insurance has had on the size of excess payments and compliance, as well as on benefits for patients and their satisfaction. METHODS: In April 2014, 859 members of a statutory insurance scheme (hkk) who received hearing aids in the 6 months prior to the reform were questioned on the timing and financial details of their hearing aid fitting, as well as on treatment compliance and quality of the results using a standardized questionnaire. In October 2014, the same questionnaire was used to collect these data from a further 622 insurance holders who had received hearing aids in the 8 months following introduction of the new regulation. Most of the questions concerning hearing quality corresponded to those of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire. RESULTS: The project revealed a statistically significant decrease of 6 percent points in the proportion of hearing aid users who had to pay any excess whatsoever; from 80.6% to 74.1%. However, 40% of the insured persons continued to pay an excess of 1000 euros and more. The subjective hearing quality remained practically unimproved by the reform and was statistically, almost without exception, independent of whether hearing aid users wore expensive devices associated with a large excess, or devices available at the standard rate. Finally, the study confirmed a previously recognized usage pattern characterized by noncompliance. For example, approximately 40% of hearing aid users did not wear their device in the everyday environment. This observation was independent of the size of the excess and the timing of the most recent visit to the hearing aid acoustician. CONCLUSION: Despite doubling of the standard rate, three quarters of patients pay an excess--sometimes a substantial one. The subjective hearing quality was not improved by doubling the standard rate; the majority of patients continue to complain of considerable problems with hearing in difficult situations (environments with background or reverberant noise). Satisfaction with hearing quality is neither dependent on the doubling of the standard rate, nor on whether or not an excess was paid. Compliance may possibly be improved by structured follow-up, which should involve the prescribing otorhinolaryngologists, as well as phoniatrists, pedaudiologists, and hearing aid acousticians.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Guideline Adherence/economics , Hearing Aids/economics , Hearing Loss/economics , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , National Health Programs/economics , Aged , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Aids/standards , Hearing Aids/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Humans , Male , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Prosthesis Fitting/economics , Prosthesis Fitting/standards
19.
J Prosthet Dent ; 114(3): 346-50, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26050027

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The recent literature underlines a correlation between plaque and the development of periimplantitis but neglects the importance of the prosthetic factors. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to appraise the available literature to evaluate the role played by cement excess and misfitting components on the development of periimplantitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search restricted to the English language was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register up to September 1, 2014, based on a selected search algorithm. Only cohort studies and case-control studies were included without additional restrictions. The presence of periimplantitis and implant failure were considered primary and secondary outcome variables. RESULTS: The search produced 275 potentially relevant titles, of which only 2 were found eligible. They showed a correlation in cemented implant prostheses between cement excess and the presence of periimplant disease, especially in patients with a history of periodontal disease. After cement excess removal by means of debridement, disease symptoms disappeared around most of the implants. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific articles on prosthetic risk factors for periimplantitis are scarce. Although the studies found on cement remnants have a high risk for bias, cement excess seems to be associated with mucositis and possibly with periimplantitis, especially in patients with a history of periodontal disease.


Subject(s)
Dental Cements , Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Dental Cements/adverse effects , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/epidemiology , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Risk Factors
20.
HNO ; 62(9): 667-81; quiz 682, 2014 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25185973

ABSTRACT

Upon review of the statutory health insurance reimbursement guidelines, a specific quality assurance questionnaire concerned with the provision of hearing aids was introduced that assesses elements of patient satisfaction within Germany's public healthcare system. APHAB questionnaire-based patient evaluation of the benefit of hearing aids represents the third pillar of audiological diagnostics, alongside classical pure-tone and speech audiometry. Another new aspect of the national guidelines is inclusion of free-field measurements in noise with and without hearing aids. Part 2 of this review describes new diagnostic aspects of speech audiometry. In addition to adaptive speech audiometry, a proposed method for applying the gold standard of speech audiometry - the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test - in noise is described. Finally, the quality assurance questionnaire will be explained as an appendix to template 15 of the regulations governing hearing aids.


Subject(s)
Audiometry/standards , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Prosthesis Fitting/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Speech Production Measurement/standards , Germany , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...