BCR/ABL1 and BCR are under the transcriptional control of the MYC oncogene.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) is caused by the BCR/ABL1 fusion gene. Both the presence and the levels of BCR/ABL1 expression seem to be critical for CML progression from chronic phase (CP) to blast crisis (BC). After the oncogenic translocation, the BCR/ABL1 gene is under the transcriptional control of BCR promoter but the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of oncogene expression are mostly unknown. METHODS: A region of 1443bp of the functional BCR promoter was studied for transcription factor binding sites through in-silico analysis and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation experiments. BCR and BCR/ABL1 expression levels were analysed in CML cell lines after over-expression or silencing of MYC transcription factor. A luciferase reporter assay was used to confirm its activity on BCR promoter. RESULTS: In the present study we demonstrate that MYC and its partner MAX bind to the BCR promoter, leading to up-regulation of BCR and BCR/ABL1 at both transcriptional and protein levels. Accordingly, silencing of MYC expression in various BCR/ABL1 positive cell lines causes significant downregulation of BCR and BCR/ABL1, which consequently leads to decreased proliferation and induction of cell death. CONCLUSIONS: Here we describe a regulatory pathway modulating BCR and BCR/ABL1 expression, showing that the BCR promoter is under the transcriptional control of the MYC/MAX heterodimer. Since MYC is frequently over-expressed in BC, this phenomenon could play a critical role in BCR/ABL1 up-regulation and blast aggressiveness acquired during CML evolution.

Regulation of dendritic arborization by BCR Rac1 GTPase-activating protein, a substrate of PTPRT.

Dendritic arborization is important for neuronal development as well as the formation of neural circuits. Rac1 is a member of the Rho GTPase family that serve as regulators of neuronal development. Breakpoint cluster region protein (BCR) is a Rac1 GTPase-activating protein that is abundantly expressed in the central nervous system. Here, we show that BCR plays a key role in neuronal development. Dendritic arborization and actin polymerization were attenuated by overexpression of BCR in hippocampal neurons. Knockdown of BCR using specific shRNAs increased the dendritic arborization as well as actin polymerization. The number of dendrites in null mutant BCR(-/-) mice was considerably increased compared with that in wild-type mice. We found that the function of the BCR GTPase-activating domain could be modulated by protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor T (PTPRT), which is expressed principally in the brain. We demonstrate that tyrosine 177 of BCR was the main target of PTPRT and the BCR mutant mimicking dephosphorylation of tyrosine 177 alleviated the attenuation of dendritic arborization. Additionally the attenuated dendritic arborization found upon BCR overexpression was relieved upon co-expression of PTPRT. When PTPRT was knocked down by a specific shRNA, the dendritic arborization was significantly reduced. The activity of the BCR GTPase-activating domain was modulated by means of conversions between the intra- and inter-molecular interactions, which are finely regulated through the dephosphorylation of a specific tyrosine residue by PTPRT. We thus show conclusively that BCR is a novel substrate of PTPRT and that BCR is involved in the regulation of neuronal development via control of the BCR GTPase-activating domain function by PTPRT.

Bcr is a substrate for Transglutaminase 2 cross-linking activity.

BACKGROUND: Breakpoint cluster region (Bcr) is a multi-domain protein that contains a C-terminal GTPase activating protein (GAP) domain for Rac. Transglutaminase 2 (TG2) regulates Bcr by direct binding to its GAP domain. Since TG2 has transglutaminase activity that has been implicated in the response to extreme stress, we investigated if Bcr can also act as a substrate for TG2. RESULTS: We here report that activation of TG2 by calcium caused the formation of covalently cross-linked Bcr. Abr, a protein related to Bcr but lacking its N-terminal oligomerization domain, was not cross-linked by TG2 even though it forms a complex with it. A Bcr mutant missing the first 62 amino acid residues remained monomeric in the presence of activated TG2, showing that this specific domain is necessary for the cross-linking reaction. Calcium influx induced by a calcium ionophore in primary human endothelial cells caused cross-linking of endogenous Bcr, which was inhibited by the TG2 inhibitor cystamine. Treatment of cells with cobalt chloride, a hypoxia-mimetic that causes cellular stress, also generated high molecular weight Bcr complexes. Cross-linked Bcr protein appeared in the TritonX-100-insoluble cell fraction and further accumulated in cells treated with a proteasome inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: Bcr thus represents both an interacting partner under non-stressed conditions and a target of transglutaminase activity for TG2 during extreme stress.

Immunocytochemical study of Bcr and Bcr-Abl localization in K562 cells.

AIM: To obtain polyclonal antibodies against recombinant proteins recognizing Bcr domain and fusion region of Bcr-Abl and analyze the patterns of intracellular distribution of Bcr and Bcr-Abl proteins in K562 cells of chronic myelogenous leukemia. METHODS: The coding sequences of DH and PH domains of Bcr-Abl were cloned, and the recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli. The rabbit polyclonal antibodies were produced and used for immunocytochemical study of Bcr and Bcr-Abl localization in K562 cells. RESULTS: The gene constructs containing sequences coding for DH and PH domains of Bcr-Abl have been obtained. The antibodies with relative specificity to corresponding recombinant proteins differ by the patterns of their intracellular reactivity with Bcr- and Bcr-Abl related structures. While Bcr protein is located predominantly perinuclearly, antibody against hybrid Bcr-Abl protein is reacted with the structures in cell periphery, namely on cell membranes. CONCLUSION: Antibodies against DH and PH domains of Bcr-Abl react with proteins located differently in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. The difference in intracellular localization of Bcr and Bcr-Abl may be attributable to the different domains interacting with different multiprotein complexes.

Activity of the Bcr GTPase-activating domain is regulated through direct protein/protein interaction with the Rho guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor.

The cycling of Rac GTPases, alternating between an active GTP- and an inactive GDP-bound state, is controlled by guanine nucleotide exchange factors, GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). Little is known about how these controlling activities are coordinated. Studies using null mutant mice have demonstrated that Bcr and Abr are two physiologically important GAPs for Rac. Here, we report that in the presence of RhoGDIalpha, Bcr is unable to convert Rac-GTP to Rac-GDP because RhoGDI forms a direct protein complex with Bcr. Interestingly, RhoGDIalpha binds to the GAP domain in Bcr and Abr, a domain that also binds to Rac-GTP and catalyzes conversion of the bound GTP to GDP on Rac. The presence of activated Rac diminished the Bcr/RhoGDIalpha interaction. Moreover, a Bcr mutant that lacks the ability to promote hydrolysis of Rac-GTP bound to its GAP domain did not bind to RhoGDIalpha in cell lysates, indicating that binding of RhoGDIalpha and Rac-GTP to the Bcr GAP domain is mutually exclusive. Our results provide the first identification of a protein that regulates BcrGAP activity.

The RhoGEF domain of p210 Bcr-Abl activates RhoA and is required for transformation.

The BCR-ABL oncogene encodes an in-frame fusion protein containing N-terminal sequences derived from Bcr and C-terminal sequences derived from Abl. Bcr contains a centrally located Rho-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RhoGEF) domain that is retained within p210 Bcr-Abl. Although this domain is subject to autoinhibition in the context of Bcr, here we show that it is constitutively activated in p210 Bcr-Abl. p210 Bcr-Abl can stimulate RhoA activation independently of its tyrosine kinase activity, and mutations within the RhoGEF domain that are predicted to eliminate RhoGEF activity inhibit RhoA activation. The RhoGEF mutant of p210 Bcr-Abl does not affect the tyrosine kinase activity of the molecule, nor the ability of p210 Bcr-Abl to interact with XPB through the RhoGEF domain. Despite retaining normal levels of tyrosine kinase activity, the RhoGEF mutant of p210 Bcr-Abl is impaired in transforming activity as measured by anchorage-independent growth. However, the mutant is still able to confer the phenotype of growth factor independence in myeloid cells, suggesting that some, but not all parameters of p210 Bcr-Abl transformation, are dependent upon a catalytically active RhoGEF domain. Collectively, these observations identify a gain-of-function activity attributable to the RhoGEF domain of p210 Bcr-Abl that is required to support the transformed phenotype.

Kinase domain mutants of Bcr enhance Bcr-Abl oncogenic effects.

Bcr-Abl acquires its transforming ability through its upregulated Abl tyrosine kinase activity. Bcr is a phosphoprotein with a novel serine/threonine kinase activity encoded by its first exon. In chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells, Bcr-Abl phosphorylates Bcr on tyrosine residues reducing its kinase activity. Overexpression of BCR in BCR-ABL+ cells produces a phosphoserine form of Bcr, which inhibits the oncogenic effects of BCR-ABL. To investigate the inhibitory effects of Bcr on Bcr-Abl, we expressed BCR/GFP in TonB210 cells, which contain a tetracycline-inducible BCR-ABL. In nude mice injected with cell clones of TonB210/BCR/GFP, tumor formation was delayed, and tumors were 50% smaller compared with the TonB210/GFP. In addition, TonB210/ BCR/GFP cells had little colony-forming ability in soft agar compared with TonB210/GFP cells. In contrast, a point mutant of BCR (Y360F), which disrupts its kinase activity, not only blocked Bcr's inhibitory effects but also enhanced the oncogenic effects of Bcr-Abl in a solid tumor model and in soft agar colony assays. Similar effects were observed with a second BCR kinase domain mutant, S354A. These results indicate that the inhibitory function of Bcr directed toward Bcr-Abl requires its kinase function.

Interesting structural and dynamical behaviors exhibited by the AF-6 PDZ domain upon Bcr peptide binding.

PDZ (postsynaptic density-95, disks large, zonula occludens-1) domains are small, protein-protein interaction modules that have multiple binding surfaces for the docking of diverse molecules. These domains can propagate signals from ligand-binding site to distal regions of the structure through allosteric communication. Recent works have revealed that picosecond to nanosecond time scale dynamics play a potential role in propagating long-range signals within a protein. Comparison of AF-6 PDZ domain structures in free and complex forms shows a conformation rearrangement of distal surface 2, which is far from the peptide binding groove. The relaxation dispersion experiments detected that the free AF-6 PDZ domain was sampling multiple conformations; millisecond dynamics mapped a network for allostery signal transmission throughout the AF-6 PDZ domain in the weak saturation state, and intramolecular motions were observed in distal surface 1 when the protein was saturated. These results provide evidence that the allosteric process in the AF-6 PDZ domain is not two-state; instead, the millisecond dynamic network provides a mechanism for the transmission of allosteric signals throughout a protein. Interestingly, the two distal surfaces of the AF-6 PDZ domain respond differently to peptide binding; distal surface 1 changes in millisecond dynamics, whereas distal surface 2 undergoes structural rearrangement. The significance of the different response patterns in the signaling pathway and its relevance to the function of the AF-6 PDZ domain should be studied further.

Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the AF-6 PDZ domain/Bcr peptide complex.

The human AF-6, a scaffold protein between cell membrane-associated proteins and the actin cytoskeleton, plays an important role in special cell-cell junctions and signal transduction. It can be phosphorylated by the protein kinase Bcr, which allows efficient binding of the C terminus of Bcr to the PDZ domain of AF-6 and consequently enhances the binding affinity of AF-6 to Ras. Formation of the AF-6, Bcr, and Ras ternary complex results in down-regulation of the Ras-mediated signal transduction pathway. To better understand the molecular basis for the recognition of the AF-6 PDZ domain and Bcr, we solve the solution structure of the AF-6 PDZ domain complexed with the C-terminal peptide of Bcr and explore the interactions between them in detail. Compared with previously reported structures, the complex exhibits a noncanonical binding mode of PDZ/peptide. Owing to the distinct residues involved in the AF-6 PDZ domain and Bcr peptide interaction, the interaction mode does not adapt to the existing classification rules that have been put forward, based on the ligand or the PDZ domain specificity. Furthermore, the PDZ domain of AF-6 can bind to the C terminus of Bcr efficiently after phosphorylation of AF-6 by the Bcr kinase. The phosphorylation may induce a conformational change of AF-6, which makes the binding surface on the PDZ domain accessible to Bcr for efficient binding. This study not only characterizes the structural details of the AF-6 PDZ/Bcr peptide complex, but also provides a potential target for future drug design and disease therapy.

Common chromatin structures at breakpoint cluster regions may lead to chromosomal translocations found in chronic and acute leukemias.

The t(9;22) BCR/ABL fusion is associated with over 90% of chronic myelogenous and 25% of acute lymphocytic leukemia. Chromosome 11q23 translocations in acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemia cells demonstrate myeloid lymphoid leukemia (MLL) fusions with over 40 gene partners, like AF9 and AF4 on chromosomes 9 and 4, respectively. Therapy-related leukemia is associated with the above gene rearrangements following the treatment with topoisomerase II (topo II) inhibitors. BCR, ABL, MLL, AF9 and AF4 have defined patient breakpoint cluster regions. Chromatin structural elements including topo II and DNase I cleavage sites and scaffold attachment sites have previously been shown to closely associate with the MLL and AF9 breakpoint cluster regions, implicating these elements in non-homologous recombination (NHR). In this report, using cell lines and primary cells, chromatin structural elements were analyzed in BCR, ABL and AF4 and, for comparison, in MLL2, which is a homolog to MLL, but not associated with chromosome translocations. Topo II and DNase I cleavage sites associated with all breakpoint cluster regions, whereas SARs associated with ABL and AF4, but not with BCR. No close breakpoint clustering with the topo II/DNase I sites were observed; however, a statistically significant 5' or 3' distribution of patient breakpoints to the topo II DNase I sites was found, implicating DNA repair and exonucleases. Although MLL2 was expressed in all cell lines tested, except for the presence of one DNAse I site in the promoter, no other structural elements were found in MLL2. A NHR model presented demonstrates the importance of chromatin structure in chromosome translocations involved with leukemia.