PIM1 inhibition attenuated endotoxin-induced acute lung injury through modulating ELK3/ICAM1 axis on pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells.

OBJECTIVE: The dysfunction of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (PMVECs) is one of the critical characteristics of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) induced by severe infection. PIM1 is a constitutively active serine/threonine kinase that is involved in multiple biological processes. However, the underlying correlation between PIM1 and PMVECs injury remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to reveal roles of PIM1 and explore the potential mechanisms during the development of endotoxin-induced ALI induced by intraperitoneal LPS administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PIM1 level in the lung tissues of endotoxin-induced ALI mice or plasma derived from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-induced ALI patients were measured. The protective roles of PIM1 specific inhibitor SMI-4a on endotoxin-induced lung injuries were evaluated through histological, permeability, neutrophil infiltration and survival assessment. The relationship between PIM1 and ELK3/ICAM-1 axis was validated in vivo and vitro. The correlation between plasma PIM1 and indicative vascular endothelium injury biomarkers (PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Ang-II, E-selectin and PAI-1) levels derived from CPB-induced ALI patient were analyzed. RESULTS: PIM1 expression in the lung tissues was increased in the mice of endotoxin-induced ALI. The PIM1 specific inhibitor SMI-4a administration relieved the severity of endotoxin-induced ALI. More importantly, PIM1 modulates ICAM1 expression through regulating transcription factor ELK3 expression in vitro. Eventually, plasma PIM1 level was positively correlated with Ang-II and PAI-1 levels but negatively correlated with SpO2/FiO2 ratio among CPB induced ALI patients. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that PIM1 inhibition carried a protective role against endotoxin-induced ALI by modulating the ELK3/ICAM1 axis on PMVECs. PIM1 may be a potential therapeutic target for endotoxin-induced ALI.

Elevated plasma Pim-1 and its clinical significance in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

This study was aimed to determine plasma Pim-1 levels in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and to estimate the clinical value of Pim-1 as a biomarker of PAH. This was a single-centre retrospective study in 111 patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) and idiopathic PAH (IPAH). Those CHD patients were divided into two groups: PAH associated with CHD (PAH-CHD) and CHD without PAH (nPAH-CHD). Plasma Pim-1 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. (a) Plasma Pim-1 levels were significantly increased in patients with PAH-CHD and IPAH compared with the healthy control group (27.81 ± 11.34 ng/mL vs 13.02 ± 5.30 ng/mL; 32.81 ± 12.28 ng/mL vs 13.02 ± 5.30 ng/mL, P < 0.05) and nPAH-CHD (27.81 ± 11.34 ng/mL vs 17.33 ± 7.99 ng/mL; 32.81 ± 12.28 ng/mL vs 17.33 ± 7.99 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Pim-1 levels were substantially increased in patients with severe PAH-CHD compared with mild-to-moderate PAH-CHD (19.12 ± 6.70 ng/mL vs 8.54 ± 3.71 ng/mL, P < 0.05). (b) Pim-1 levels were correlated positively with the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (r = 0.582, 0.516; P < 0.001, respectively), while negatively with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular plane systolic velocity (S') and right ventricular fractional area changes (RVFAC) (r = -0.375, -0.354, -0.507; P < 0.05, respectively). (c) PAH-CHD and severe PAH-CHD was identified by plasma Pim-1 with a cutoff value of 16.8 ng/mL (P < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 87.3% and a specificity of 65%, and a cutoff value of 20.53 ng/mL (P < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 87.3% and a specificity of 52%, respectively. Plasma Pim-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with PAH-CHD and IPAH. Plasma Pim-1 may represent an effectively biomarker in patients with PAH.

PIM-1 contributes to the malignancy of pancreatic cancer and displays diagnostic and prognostic value.

BACKGROUND: The effects of PIM-1 on the progression of pancreatic cancer remain unclear, and the prognostic value of PIM-1 levels in tissues is controversial. Additionally, the expression levels and clinical value of PIM-1 in plasma have not been reported. METHODS: The effects of PIM-1 on biological behaviours were analysed. PIM-1 levels in tissues and plasma were detected, and the clinical value was evaluated. RESULTS: We found that PIM-1 knockdown in pancreatic cancer cells suppressed proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest, enhanced apoptosis, resensitized cells to gemcitabine and erlotinib treatment, and inhibited ABCG2 and EZH2 mRNA expression. Our results indicated that PIM-1 and the EGFR pathway formed a positive feedback loop. We also found that PIM-1 expression in pancreatic cancer tissues was significantly upregulated and that a high level of expression was negatively associated with prognosis (P = 0.025, hazard ratio [HR] =2.113, 95 % confidence interval: 1.046-4.266). Additionally, we found that plasma PIM-1 levels in patients with pancreatic cancer were significantly increased and could be used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. High plasma PIM-1 expression was an independent adverse prognostic factor for pancreatic cancer (P = 0.037, HR = 1.87, 95 % CI: 1.04-3.35). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that PIM-1 contributes to malignancy and has diagnostic and prognostic value in pancreatic cancer.