Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.933
Filter
1.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 23: 15330338241252622, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845139

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The aim of this matched-pair cohort study was to evaluate the potential of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for sparring of the pelvic bone marrow and thus reduction of hematotoxicity compared to intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) in the setting of postoperative irradiation of gynaecological malignancies. Secondary endpoint was the assessment of predictive parameters for the occurrence of sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF) when applying IMPT. Materials and Methods: Two cohorts were analyzed consisting of 25 patients each. Patients were treated with IMPT compared with IMRT and had uterine cervical (n = 8) or endometrial cancer (n = 17). Dose prescription, patient age, and diagnosis were matched. Dosimetric parameters delivered to the whole pelvic skeleton and subsites (ilium, lumbosacral, sacral, and lower pelvis) and hematological toxicity were evaluated. MRI follow-up for evaluation of SIF was only available for the IMPT group. Results: In the IMPT group, integral dose to the pelvic skeleton was significantly lower (23.4GyRBE vs 34.3Gy; p < 0.001), the average V5Gy, V10Gy, and V20Gy were reduced by 40%, 41%, and 28%, respectively, compared to the IMRT group (p < 0.001). In particular, for subsites ilium and lower pelvis, the low dose volume was significantly lower. Hematotoxicity was significantly more common in the IMRT group (80% vs 32%; p = 0009), especially hematotoxicity ≥ CTCAE II (36% vs 8%; p = 0.037). No patient in the IMPT group experienced hematotoxicity > CTCAE II. In the IMPT cohort, 32% of patients experienced SIF. Overall SIF occurred more frequently with a total dose of 50.4 GyRBE (37.5%) compared to 45 GyRBE (22%). No significant predictive dose parameters regarding SIF could be detected aside from a trend regarding V50Gy to the lumbosacral subsite. Conclusion: Low-dose exposure to the pelvic skeleton and thus hematotoxicity can be significantly reduced by using IMPT compared to a matched photon cohort. Sacral insufficiency fracture rates appear similar to reported rates for IMRT in the literature.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow , Genital Neoplasms, Female , Proton Therapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Female , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Proton Therapy/methods , Bone Marrow/radiation effects , Bone Marrow/pathology , Middle Aged , Aged , Genital Neoplasms, Female/radiotherapy , Adult , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(19): e38089, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728501

ABSTRACT

Proton beam therapy (PBT) has great advantages as tumor radiotherapy and is progressively becoming a more prevalent choice for individuals undergoing radiation therapy. The objective of this review is to pinpoint collaborative efforts among countries and institutions, while also exploring the hot topics and future outlook in the field of PBT. Data from publications were downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace and Excel 2016 were used to conduct the bibliometric and knowledge map analysis. A total of 6516 publications were identified, with the total number of articles steadily increasing and the United States being the most productive country. Harvard University took the lead in contributing the highest number of publications. Paganetti Harald published the most articles and had the most cocitations. PHYS MED BIOL published the greatest number of PBT-related articles, while INT J RADIAT ONCOL received the most citations. Paganetti Harald, 2012, PHYS MED BIOL can be classified as classic literature due to its high citation rate. We believe that research on technology development, dose calculation and relative biological effectiveness were the knowledge bases in this field. Future research hotspots may include clinical trials, flash radiotherapy, and immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Proton Therapy , Proton Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Proton Therapy/methods , Humans , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/radiotherapy
3.
Bull Exp Biol Med ; 176(5): 626-630, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730109

ABSTRACT

We studied the antitumor activity of the combined use of local proton irradiation in two modes (10 and 31 Gy) with preliminary intra-tumoral injection of two types of bismuth nanoparticles differing in surface coating: coated with the amphiphilic molecule Pluronic-F127 or Silane-PEG (5 kDa)-COOH polymer. Nanoparticles were used in doses of 0.75 and 1.5 mg/mouse. In two independent series on experimental tumor model (solid Ehrlich carcinoma), bismuth nanoparticles of both modifications injected directly into the tumor enhanced the antitumor effects of proton therapy. Moreover, the radiosensitizing effect of bismuth nanoparticles administered via this route increased with the increasing the doses of nanoparticles and the doses of radiation exposure. In our opinion, these promising data obtained for the first time extend the possibilities of treating malignant neoplasms.


Subject(s)
Bismuth , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor , Poloxamer , Proton Therapy , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor/pathology , Animals , Bismuth/therapeutic use , Bismuth/chemistry , Mice , Proton Therapy/methods , Poloxamer/chemistry , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/chemistry , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , Metal Nanoparticles/therapeutic use , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Female
4.
Radiat Oncol ; 19(1): 56, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oncologic surgical resection is the standard of care for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS), often accompanied by the addition of pre- or postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT may decrease the risk of joint stiffness and fibrosis at the cost of higher rates of wound complications. Hypofractionated, preoperative RT has been shown to provide acceptable outcomes in prospective trials. Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides the means to decrease dose to surrounding organs at risk, such as the skin, bone, soft tissues, and adjacent joint(s), and has not yet been studied in patients with extremity and truncal sarcoma. METHODS: Our study titled "PROspective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated protoN therapy for extremity and Truncal soft tissue sarcOma (PRONTO)" is a non-randomized, prospective phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative, hypofractionated PBT for patients with STS of the extremity and trunk planned for surgical resection. Adult patients with Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status ≤ 2 with resectable extremity and truncal STS will be included, with the aim to accrue 40 patients. Treatment will consist of 30 Gy radiobiological equivalent of PBT in 5 fractions delivered every other day, followed by surgical resection 2-12 weeks later. The primary outcome is rate of major wound complications as defined according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada Sarcoma2 (NCIC-SR2) Multicenter Trial. Secondary objectives include rate of late grade ≥ 2 toxicity, local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival at 1- and 2-years, functional outcomes, quality of life, and pathologic response. DISCUSSION: PRONTO represents the first trial evaluating the use of hypofractionated PBT for STS. We aim to prove the safety and efficacy of this approach and to compare our results to historical outcomes established by previous trials. Given the low number of proton centers and limited availability, the short course of PBT may provide the opportunity to treat patients who would otherwise be limited when treating with daily RT over several weeks. We hope that this trial will lead to increased referral patterns, offer benefits towards patient convenience and clinic workflow efficiency, and provide evidence supporting the use of PBT in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05917301 (registered 23/6/2023).


Subject(s)
Extremities , Proton Therapy , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Sarcoma , Humans , Proton Therapy/methods , Sarcoma/radiotherapy , Sarcoma/pathology , Prospective Studies , Adult , Female , Male , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery , Preoperative Care , Torso
5.
Rev Med Liege ; 79(S1): 9-15, 2024 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778643

ABSTRACT

Most radiotherapy treatments are nowadays delivered with linear accelerators producing photons. This robust radiation technique improved outstandingly during the last three decades, allowing treatments for most tumoural indications with an exquisite accuracy, a formidable effectiveness, a low toxicity, and a very low cost for the society. Therefore, the reasons for using and developing the more expensive hadron therapy and more particularly proton therapy may seem futile. In the current article targeting the general practitioners readership, we look at the principles of this innovative technique, its inherent advantages and limitations, the current and future indications, the challenges and perspectives for the future. We conclude with an overview of the Belgian landscape in terms of installation, operation, access and reimbursement procedures.


L'essentiel des traitements de radiothérapie sont délivrés à l'aide d'accélérateurs linéaires produisant des photons. La technique est robuste et a connu une évolution fulgurante ces trois dernières décennies, apportant une efficacité redoutable et une extrême précision dans de nombreuses indications tumorales, avec les avantages d'un risque de toxicité réduit et d'un coût sociétal extrêmement faible. Dès lors, quel intérêt y aurait-il à utiliser et développer des traitements de radiothérapie par hadrons, et plus particulièrement par protons, sachant que les coûts d'installation et de production sont, au bas mot, décuplés par rapport aux photons ? Dans cet article destiné en première intention aux praticiens de santé généralistes, nous abordons les principes de fonctionnement, les avantages et limitations inhérents à la technique, les indications actuelles et celles qui se profilent, les défis et perspectives à venir. Nous terminons, enfin, par un tour d'horizon du paysage belge en termes d'installation, de fonctionnement, d'accès et de modalités de remboursement.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Proton Therapy , Humans , Belgium , Proton Therapy/methods , Neoplasms/radiotherapy
6.
Neurosurg Focus ; 56(5): E9, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691864

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chordomas are rare tumors of the skull base and spine believed to arise from the vestiges of the embryonic notochord. These tumors are locally aggressive and frequently recur following resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. Proton therapy has been introduced as a tissue-sparing option because of the higher level of precision that proton-beam techniques offer compared with traditional photon radiotherapy. This study aimed to compare recurrence in patients with chordomas receiving proton versus photon radiotherapy following resection by applying tree-based machine learning models. METHODS: The clinical records of all patients treated with resection followed by adjuvant proton or photon radiotherapy for chordoma at Mayo Clinic were reviewed. Patient demographics, type of surgery and radiotherapy, tumor recurrence, and other variables were extracted. Decision tree classifiers were trained and tested to predict long-term recurrence based on unseen data using an 80/20 split. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with a mean ± SD age of 55.2 ± 13.4 years receiving surgery and adjuvant proton or photon therapy to treat chordoma were identified; most patients were male. Gross-total resection was achieved in 54.7% of cases. Proton therapy was the most common adjuvant radiotherapy (84.9%), followed by conventional or external-beam radiation therapy (9.4%) and stereotactic radiosurgery (5.7%). Patients receiving proton therapy exhibited a 40% likelihood of having recurrence, significantly lower than the 88% likelihood observed in those treated with nonproton therapy. This was confirmed on logistic regression analysis adjusted for extent of tumor resection and tumor location, which revealed that proton adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01-0.71; p = 0.047) compared with photon therapy. The decision tree algorithm predicted recurrence with an accuracy of 90% (95% CI 55.5%-99.8%), with the lowest risk of recurrence observed in patients receiving gross-total resection with adjuvant proton therapy (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Following resection, adjuvant proton therapy was associated with a lower risk of chordoma recurrence compared with photon therapy. The described machine learning models were able to predict tumor progression based on the extent of tumor resection and adjuvant radiotherapy modality used.


Subject(s)
Chordoma , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Photons , Proton Therapy , Spinal Neoplasms , Humans , Chordoma/radiotherapy , Chordoma/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Adult , Aged , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Photons/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10637, 2024 05 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724569

ABSTRACT

Hadron therapy is an advanced radiation modality for treating cancer, which currently uses protons and carbon ions. Hadrons allow for a highly conformal dose distribution to the tumour, minimising the detrimental side-effects due to radiation received by healthy tissues. Treatment with hadrons requires sub-millimetre spatial resolution and high dosimetric accuracy. This paper discusses the design, fabrication and performance tests of a detector based on Gas Electron Multipliers (GEM) coupled to a matrix of thin-film transistors (TFT), with an active area of 60 × 80 mm2 and 200 ppi resolution. The experimental results show that this novel detector is able to detect low-energy (40 kVp X-rays), high-energy (6 MeV) photons used in conventional radiation therapy and protons and carbon ions of clinical energies used in hadron therapy. The GEM-TFT is a compact, fully scalable, radiation-hard detector that measures secondary electrons produced by the GEMs with sub-millimetre spatial resolution and a linear response for proton currents from 18 pA to 0.7 nA. Correcting known detector defects may aid in future studies on dose uniformity, LET dependence, and different gas mixture evaluation, improving the accuracy of QA in radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Radiometry , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/methods , Humans , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/standards , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Electrons , Radiotherapy Dosage , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Equipment Design , Proton Therapy/instrumentation , Proton Therapy/methods
8.
Phys Med Biol ; 69(12)2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729194

ABSTRACT

Objective. Propose a highly automated treatment plan re-optimization strategy suitable for online adaptive proton therapy. The strategy includes a rapid re-optimization method that generates quality replans and a novel solution that efficiently addresses the planning constraint infeasibility issue that can significantly prolong the re-optimization process.Approach. We propose a systematic reference point method (RPM) model that minimizes the l-infinity norm from the initial treatment plan in the daily objective space for online re-optimization. This model minimizes the largest objective value deviation among the objectives of the daily replan from their reference values, leading to a daily replan similar to the initial plan. Whether a set of planning constraints is feasible with respect to the daily anatomy cannot be known before solving the corresponding optimization problem. The conventional trial-and-error-based relaxation process can cost a significant amount of time. To that end, we propose an optimization problem that first estimates the magnitude of daily violation of each planning constraint. Guided by the violation magnitude and clinical importance of the constraints, the constraints are then iteratively converted into objectives based on their priority until the infeasibility issue is solved.Main results.The proposed RPM-based strategy generated replans similar to the offline manual replans within the online time requirement for six head and neck and four breast patients. The average targetD95and relevant organ at risk sparing parameter differences between the RPM replans and clinical offline replans were -0.23, -1.62 Gy for head and neck cases and 0.29, -0.39 Gy for breast cases. The proposed constraint relaxation solution made the RPM problem feasible after one round of relaxation for all four patients who encountered the infeasibility issue.Significance. We proposed a novel RPM-based re-optimization strategy and demonstrated its effectiveness on complex cases, regardless of whether constraint infeasibility is encountered.


Subject(s)
Proton Therapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11166, 2024 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750148

ABSTRACT

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in treatment planning due to its superior soft tissue contrast, which is useful for tumor and soft tissue delineation compared to computed tomography (CT). However, MRI cannot directly provide mass density or relative stopping power (RSP) maps, which are required for calculating proton radiotherapy doses. Therefore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into MRI-based treatment planning to estimate mass density and RSP directly from MRI has generated significant interest. A deep learning (DL) based framework was developed to establish a voxel-wise correlation between MR images and mass density as well as RSP. To facilitate the study, five tissue substitute phantoms were created, representing different tissues such as skin, muscle, adipose tissue, 45% hydroxyapatite (HA), and spongiosa bone. The composition of these phantoms was based on information from ICRP reports. Additionally, two animal tissue phantoms, simulating pig brain and liver, were prepared for DL training purposes. The phantom study involved the development of two DL models. The first model utilized clinical T1 and T2 MRI scans as input, while the second model incorporated zero echo time (ZTE) MRI scans. In the patient application study, two more DL models were trained: one using T1 and T2 MRI scans as input, and another model incorporating synthetic dual-energy computed tomography (sDECT) images to provide accurate bone tissue information. The DECT empirical model was used as a reference to evaluate the proposed models in both phantom and patient application studies. The DECT empirical model was selected as the reference for evaluating the proposed models in both phantom and patient application studies. In the phantom study, the DL model based on T1, and T2 MRI scans demonstrated higher accuracy in estimating mass density and RSP for skin, muscle, adipose tissue, brain, and liver. The mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) were 0.42%, 0.14%, 0.19%, 0.78%, and 0.26% for mass density, and 0.30%, 0.11%, 0.16%, 0.61%, and 0.23% for RSP, respectively. The DL model incorporating ZTE MRI further improved the accuracy of mass density and RSP estimation for 45% HA and spongiosa bone, with MAPE values of 0.23% and 0.09% for mass density, and 0.19% and 0.07% for RSP, respectively. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using an MRI-only approach combined with DL methods for mass density and RSP estimation in proton therapy treatment planning. By employing this approach, it is possible to obtain the necessary information for proton radiotherapy directly from MRI scans, eliminating the need for additional imaging modalities.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Proton Therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Proton Therapy/methods , Humans , Animals , Swine , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage
10.
Phys Med Biol ; 69(11)2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718814

ABSTRACT

Objective.To evaluate the feasibility of using a deep learning dose prediction approach to identify patients who could benefit most from proton therapy based on the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model.Approach.Two 3D UNets were established to predict photon and proton doses. A dataset of 95 patients with localized prostate cancer was randomly partitioned into 55, 10, and 30 for training, validation, and testing, respectively. We selected NTCP models for late rectum bleeding and acute urinary urgency of grade 2 or higher to quantify the benefit of proton therapy. Propagated uncertainties of predicted ΔNTCPs resulting from the dose prediction errors were calculated. Patient selection accuracies for a single endpoint and a composite evaluation were assessed under different ΔNTCP thresholds.Main results.Our deep learning-based dose prediction technique can reduce the time spent on plan comparison from approximately 2 days to as little as 5 seconds. The expanded uncertainty of predicted ΔNTCPs for rectum and bladder endpoints propagated from the dose prediction error were 0.0042 and 0.0016, respectively, which is less than one-third of the acceptable tolerance. The averaged selection accuracies for rectum bleeding, urinary urgency, and composite evaluation were 90%, 93.5%, and 93.5%, respectively.Significance.Our study demonstrates that deep learning dose prediction and NTCP evaluation scheme could distinguish the NTCP differences between photon and proton treatment modalities. In addition, the dose prediction uncertainty does not significantly influence the decision accuracy of NTCP-based patient selection for proton therapy. Therefore, automated deep learning dose prediction and NTCP evaluation schemes can potentially be used to screen large patient populations and to avoid unnecessary delays in the start of prostate cancer radiotherapy in the future.


Subject(s)
Automation , Deep Learning , Prostatic Neoplasms , Proton Therapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Probability , Uncertainty
11.
Phys Med Biol ; 69(11)2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759678

ABSTRACT

Objective.Hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy (RT) is a cancer treatment option to broaden access to proton RT. Additionally, with a refined treatment planning method, hybrid RT has the potential to offer superior plan quality compared to proton-only or photon-only RT, particularly in terms of target coverage and sparing organs-at-risk (OARs), when considering robustness to setup and range uncertainties. However, there is a concern regarding the underestimation of the biological effect of protons on OARs, especially those in close proximity to targets. This study seeks to develop a hybrid treatment planning method with biological dose optimization, suitable for clinical implementation on existing proton and photon machines, with each photon or proton treatment fraction delivering a uniform target dose.Approach.The proposed hybrid biological dose optimization method optimized proton and photon plan variables, along with the number of fractions for each modality, minimizing biological dose to the OARs and surrounding normal tissues. To mitigate underestimation of hot biological dose spots, proton biological dose was minimized within a ring structure surrounding the target. Hybrid plans were designed to be deliverable separately and robustly on existing proton and photon machines, with enforced uniform target dose constraints for the proton and photon fraction doses. A probabilistic formulation was utilized for robust optimization of setup and range uncertainties for protons and photons. The nonconvex optimization problem, arising from minimum monitor unit constraint and dose-volume histogram constraints, was solved using an iterative convex relaxation method.Main results.Hybrid planning with biological dose optimization effectively eliminated hot spots of biological dose, particularly in normal tissues surrounding the target, outperforming proton-only planning. It also provided superior overall plan quality and OAR sparing compared to proton-only or photon-only planning strategies.Significance.This study presents a novel hybrid biological treatment planning method capable of generating plans with reduced biological hot spots, superior plan quality to proton-only or photon-only plans, and clinical deliverability on existing proton and photon machines, separately and robustly.


Subject(s)
Organs at Risk , Photons , Proton Therapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Photons/therapeutic use , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Protons
12.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 23: 15330338241246653, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773763

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC) is a radioresistant tumor. Particle therapy, primarily proton beam therapy and carbon-ion radiation, is a potential radiotherapy treatment for radioresistant malignancies. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of charged particle radiation therapy on HNACC. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline until December 31, 2022. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included treatment-related toxicity. Version 17.0 of STATA was used for all analyses. Results: A total of 14 studies, involving 1297 patients, were included in the analysis. The pooled 5-year OS and PFS rates for primary HNACC were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 66-91%) and 62% (95% CI = 47-77%), respectively. For all patients included, the pooled 2-year and 5-year OS, LC, and PFS rates were as follows: 86.1% (95% CI = 95-100%) and 77% (95% CI = 73-82%), 92% (95% CI = 84-100%) and 73% (95% CI = 61-85%), and 76% (95% CI = 68-84%) and 55% (95% CI = 48-62%), respectively. The rates of grade 3 and above acute toxicity were 22% (95% CI = 13-32%), while late toxicity rates were 8% (95% CI = 3-13%). Conclusions: Particle therapy has the potential to improve treatment outcomes and raise the quality of life for HNACC patients. However, further research and optimization are needed due to the limited availability and cost considerations associated with this treatment modality.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Proton Therapy/methods , Heavy Ion Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Heavy Ion Radiotherapy/methods , Treatment Outcome
13.
Dokl Biochem Biophys ; 516(1): 111-114, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795244

ABSTRACT

Proton therapy can treat tumors located in radiation-sensitive tissues. This article demonstrates the possibility of enhancing the proton therapy with targeted gold nanoparticles that selectively recognize tumor cells. Au-PEG nanoparticles at concentrations above 25 mg/L and 4 Gy proton dose caused complete death of EMT6/P cells in vitro. Binary proton therapy using targeted Au-PEG-FA nanoparticles caused an 80% tumor growth inhibition effect in vivo. The use of targeted gold nanoparticles is promising for enhancing the proton irradiation effect on tumor cells and requires further research to increase the therapeutic index of the approach.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor , Gold , Metal Nanoparticles , Proton Therapy , Gold/chemistry , Gold/pharmacology , Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , Metal Nanoparticles/therapeutic use , Proton Therapy/methods , Animals , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor/pathology , Mice , Cell Line, Tumor , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry
14.
Phys Med Biol ; 69(12)2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776949

ABSTRACT

Objective. In-beam positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising technology for real-time monitoring of proton therapy. Random coincidences between prompt radiation events and positron annihilation photon pairs can deteriorate imaging quality during beam-on operation. This study aimed to improve the PET image quality by filtering out the prompt radiation events.Approach. We investigated a prompt radiation event filtering method based on the accelerator radio frequency phase and assessed its performance using various prompt gamma energy thresholds. An in-beam PET prototype was used to acquire the data when the 70 MeV proton beam irradiated a water phantom and a mouse. The signal-to-background ratio (SBR) indicator was utilized to evaluate the quality of the PET reconstruction image.Main results. The selection of the prompt gamma energy threshold will affect the quality of the reconstructed image. Using the optimal energy threshold of 580 keV can obtain a SBR of 1.6 times for the water phantom radiation experiment and 2.0 times for the mouse radiation experiment compared to those without background removal, respectively.Significance. Our results show that using this optimal threshold can reduce the prompt radiation events, enhancing the SBR of the reconstructed image. This advancement contributes to more accurate real-time range verification in subsequent steps.


Subject(s)
Phantoms, Imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Proton Therapy , Proton Therapy/methods , Mice , Animals , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Water
15.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11569, 2024 05 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773258

ABSTRACT

Combining radiation therapy with immunotherapy is a strategy to improve both treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare responses for two syngeneic head and neck cancer (HNC) tumor models in mice following X-ray or proton irradiation with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). MOC1 (immunogenic) and MOC2 (less immunogenic) tumors were inoculated in the right hind leg of each mouse (C57BL/6J, n = 398). Mice were injected with anti-PDL1 (10 mg/kg, twice weekly for 2 weeks), and tumors were treated with single-dose irradiation (5-30 Gy) with X-rays or protons. MOC2 tumors grew faster and were more radioresistant than MOC1 tumors, and all mice with MOC2 tumors developed metastases. Irradiation reduced the tumor volume in a dose-dependent manner. ICI alone reduced the tumor volume for MOC1 with 20% compared to controls, while no reduction was seen for MOC2. For MOC1, there was a clear treatment synergy when combining irradiation with ICI for radiation doses above 5 Gy and there was a tendency for X-rays being slightly more biologically effective compared to protons. For MOC2, there was a tendency of protons being more effective than X-rays, but both radiation types showed a small synergy when combined with ICI. Although the responses and magnitudes of the therapeutic effect varied, the optimal radiation dose for maximal synergy appeared to be in the order of 10-15 Gy, regardless of tumor model.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Proton Therapy , Animals , Mice , Proton Therapy/methods , Immunotherapy/methods , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Mouth Neoplasms/therapy , Mouth Neoplasms/immunology , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Cell Line, Tumor , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , X-Rays , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , X-Ray Therapy , Female , Disease Models, Animal
16.
Phys Med Biol ; 69(11)2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714191

ABSTRACT

Objective.This study aims to address the limitations of traditional methods for calculating linear energy transfer (LET), a critical component in assessing relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Currently, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, the gold-standard for accuracy, is resource-intensive and slow for dose optimization, while the speedier analytical approximation has compromised accuracy. Our objective was to prototype a deep-learning-based model for calculating dose-averaged LET (LETd) using patient anatomy and dose-to-water (DW) data, facilitating real-time biological dose evaluation and LET optimization within proton treatment planning systems.Approach. 275 4-field prostate proton Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy plans were analyzed, rendering a total of 1100 fields. Those were randomly split into 880, 110, and 110 fields for training, validation, and testing. A 3D Cascaded UNet model, along with data processing and inference pipelines, was developed to generate patient-specific LETddistributions from CT images and DW. The accuracy of the LETdof the test dataset was evaluated against MC-generated ground truth through voxel-based mean absolute error (MAE) and gamma analysis.Main results.The proposed model accurately inferred LETddistributions for each proton field in the test dataset. A single-field LETdcalculation took around 100 ms with trained models running on a NVidia A100 GPU. The selected model yielded an average MAE of 0.94 ± 0.14 MeV cm-1and a gamma passing rate of 97.4% ± 1.3% when applied to the test dataset, with the largest discrepancy at the edge of fields where the dose gradient was the largest and counting statistics was the lowest.Significance.This study demonstrates that deep-learning-based models can efficiently calculate LETdwith high accuracy as a fast-forward approach. The model shows great potential to be utilized for optimizing the RBE of proton treatment plans. Future efforts will focus on enhancing the model's performance and evaluating its adaptability to different clinical scenarios.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Linear Energy Transfer , Proton Therapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Proton Therapy/methods , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Monte Carlo Method , Radiotherapy Dosage , Male
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8193, 2024 04 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589544

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to determine the specific relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of various cells in the hippocampus following proton irradiation. Sixty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly allocated to 5 groups receiving 20 or 30 Gy of proton or photon irradiation. Pathomorphological neuronal damage in the hippocampus was assessed using Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The expression level of NeuN, Nestin, Caspase-3, Olig2, CD68 and CD45 were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The RBE range established by comparing the effects of proton and photon irradiation at equivalent biological outcomes. Proton20Gy induced more severe damage to neurons than photon20Gy, but showed no difference compared to photon30Gy. The RBE of neuron was determined to be 1.65. Similarly, both proton20Gy and proton30Gy resulted in more inhibition of oligodendrocytes and activation of microglia in the hippocampal regions than photon20Gy and photon30Gy. However, the expression of Olig2 was higher and CD68 was lower in the proton20Gy group than in the photon30Gy group. The RBE of oligodendrocyte and microglia was estimated to be between 1.1 to 1.65. For neural stem cells (NSCs) and immune cells, there were no significant difference in the expression of Nestin and CD45 between proton and photon irradiation (both 20 and 30 Gy). Therefore, the RBE for NSCs and immune cell was determined to be 1.1. These findings highlight the varying RBE values of different cells in the hippocampus in vivo. Moreover, the actual RBE of the hippocampus may be higher than 1.1, suggesting that using as RBE value of 1.1 in clinical practice may underestimate the toxicities induced by proton radiation.


Subject(s)
Proton Therapy , Protons , Rats , Animals , Proton Therapy/methods , Nestin , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Hippocampus
18.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 10(3)2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652667

ABSTRACT

Utilising Machine Learning (ML) models to predict dosimetric parameters in pencil beam scanning proton therapy presents a promising and practical approach. The study developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict proton beam spot size and relative positional errors using 9000 proton spot data. The irradiation log files as input variables and corresponding scintillation detector measurements as the label values. The ANN models were developed to predict six variables: spot size in thex-axis,y-axis, major axis, minor axis, and relative positional errors in thex-axis andy-axis. All ANN models used a Multi-layer perception (MLP) network using one input layer, three hidden layers, and one output layer. Model performance was validated using various statistical tools. The log file recorded spot size and relative positional errors, which were compared with scintillator-measured data. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values for the x-spot and y-spot sizes were 0.356 mm and 0.362 mm, respectively. Additionally, the maximum variation for the x-spot relative positional error was 0.910 mm, while for the y-spot, it was 1.610 mm. The ANN models exhibit lower prediction errors. Specifically, the RMSE values for spot size prediction in the x, y, major, and minor axes are 0.053 mm, 0.049 mm, 0.053 mm, and 0.052 mm, respectively. Additionally, the relative spot positional error prediction model for the x and y axes yielded maximum errors of 0.160 mm and 0.170 mm, respectively. The normality of models was validated using the residual histogram and Q-Q plot. The data over fit, and bias were tested using K (k = 5) fold cross-validation, and the maximum RMSE value of the K fold cross-validation among all the six ML models was less than 0.150 mm (R-Square 0.960). All the models showed excellent prediction accuracy. Accurately predicting beam spot size and positional errors enhances efficiency in routine dosimetric checks.


Subject(s)
Neural Networks, Computer , Proton Therapy , Radiometry , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiometry/methods , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Algorithms , Machine Learning , Reproducibility of Results , Protons
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8468, 2024 04 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605022

ABSTRACT

Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (SFRT) has demonstrated promising potential in cancer treatment, combining the advantages of reduced post-radiation effects and enhanced local control rates. Within this paradigm, proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) was suggested as a new treatment modality, possibly producing superior normal tissue sparing to conventional proton therapy, leading to improvements in patient outcomes. However, an effective and convenient beam generation method for pMBRT, capable of implementing various optimum dose profiles, is essential for its real-world application. Our study investigates the potential of utilizing the moiré effect in a dual collimator system (DCS) to generate pMBRT dose profiles with the flexibility to modify the center-to-center distance (CTC) of the dose distribution in a technically simple way.We employ the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations tool to demonstrate that the angle between the two collimators of a DCS can significantly impact the dose profile. Varying the DCS angle from 10 ∘ to 50 ∘ we could cover CTC ranging from 11.8 mm to 2.4 mm, respectively. Further investigations reveal the substantial influence of the multi-slit collimator's (MSC) physical parameters on the spatially fractionated dose profile, such as period (CTC), throughput, and spacing between MSCs. These findings highlight opportunities for precision dose profile adjustments tailored to specific clinical scenarios.The DCS capacity for rapid angle adjustments during the energy transition stages of a spot scanning system can facilitate dynamic alterations in the irradiation profile, enhancing dose contrast in normal tissues. Furthermore, its unique attribute of spatially fractionated doses in both lateral directions could potentially improve normal tissue sparing by minimizing irradiated volume. Beyond the realm of pMBRT, the dual MSC system exhibits remarkable versatility, showing compatibility with different types of beams (X-rays and electrons) and applicability across various SFRT modalities.Our study illuminates the dual MSC system's potential as an efficient and adaptable tool in the refinement of pMBRT techniques. By enabling meticulous control over irradiation profiles, this system may expedite advancements in clinical and experimental applications, thereby contributing to the evolution of SFRT strategies.


Subject(s)
Proton Therapy , Radiation Injuries , Humans , Proton Therapy/methods , Protons , Radiation, Ionizing , Monte Carlo Method , Etoposide , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
20.
Cancer Radiother ; 28(2): 195-201, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599941

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Preclinical data demonstrated that the use of proton minibeam radiotherapy reduces the risk of toxicity in healthy tissue. Ventricular tachycardia radioablation is an area under clinical investigation in proton beam therapy. We sought to simulate a ventricular tachycardia radioablation with proton minibeams and to demonstrate that it was possible to obtain a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone with this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An arrhythmogenic target volume was defined on the simulation CT scan of a patient, localized in the lateral wall of the left ventricle. A dose of 25Gy was planned to be delivered by proton minibeam radiotherapy, simulated using a Monte Carlo code (TOPAS v.3.7) with a collimator of 19 0.4 mm-wide slits spaced 3mm apart. The main objective of the study was to obtain a plan ensuring at least 93% of the prescription dose in 93% of the planning target volume without exceeding 110% of the prescribed dose in the planning target volume. RESULTS: The average dose in the planning treatment volume in proton minibeam radiotherapy was 25.12Gy. The percentage of the planning target volume receiving 93% (V93%), 110% (V110%), and 95% (V95%) of the prescribed dose was 94.25%, 0%, and 92.6% respectively. The lateral penumbra was 6.6mm. The mean value of the peak-to-valley-dose ratio in the planning target volume was 1.06. The mean heart dose was 2.54Gy versus 5.95Gy with stereotactic photon beam irradiation. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study shows that proton minibeam radiotherapy can achieve a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone, reducing the dose at the normal tissues. This technique, ensuring could theoretically reduce the risk of late pulmonary and breast fibrosis, as well as cardiac toxicity as seen in previous biological studies in proton minibeam radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Proton Therapy , Protons , Humans , Feasibility Studies , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiometry , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Monte Carlo Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...