Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Invest Dermatol ; 141(4): 754-760.e1, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941916

ABSTRACT

Chronic pruritus (CP) has considerable implications for QOL. However, its impact on health-related QOL and economic burden is not fully characterized. We administered a cross-sectional survey on 132 patients with CP using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 instrument. Normative data from healthy adults (n = 4,187) were obtained from the Joint Canada/US Survey of Health. Quality-adjusted life-year loss and economic costs were estimated on the basis of Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores of patients with CP versus controls. Patients with CP had lower overall health performance than the control (0.56 ± 0.03 vs. 0.86 ± 0.003, P < 0.001). In multivariable regression, CP was associated with worse overall health performance (coefficient = -0.30, 95% confidence interval = -0.33 to -0.27), most accentuated in the domains of pain (coefficient = -0.24, confidence interval = -0.28 to -0.21) and emotion (coefficient = -0.11, confidence interval = -0.13 to -0.10). The reduced Health Utilities Index Mark 3 score correlated with 5.5 average lifetime quality-adjusted life-years lost per patient. Using conservative estimates for willingness to pay, the quality-adjusted life-year loss translated to an individual lifetime economic burden of $274,921 and a societal burden of $88.8 billion. CP is associated with significant QOL impairment. The economic burden of CP highlights the necessity for further research into management options.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Pain/economics , Pruritus/economics , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/economics , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/epidemiology , Pain/etiology , Pain/psychology , Pruritus/complications , Pruritus/epidemiology , Pruritus/psychology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 35(5): 332-338, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31063610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Narrowband UVB phototherapy is a common treatment modality in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, but evidence of its actual effect in clinical setting is sparse. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and costs of narrowband UVB phototherapy in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in clinical setting. METHODS: We observed 207 psoriasis patients and 144 atopic dermatitis patients in eight centers. SAPASI, PO-SCORAD, and VAS measures were used at baseline, at the end, and 3 months after the narrowband UVB phototherapy course. Quality of life was measured using Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and costs were assessed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: In both psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, the DLQI and Self-Administrated PASI (SAPASI)/Patient-Oriented SCORAD (PO-SCORAD) improved significantly and the results remained improved for at least 3 months in both groups. Alleviation of pruritus correlated with better quality of life in both patient groups. We reported slight redness and burning side effects which were due to lack of MED testing. Self-administered tools proved to be useful in evaluating pruritus and severity of the disease in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Mean patient costs were 310 € and 21 hours of time, and mean costs for the healthcare provider were 810 €. CONCLUSION: In psoriasis, narrowband UVB is a very efficient treatment in clinical setting, whereas in atopic dermatitis, more studies are needed to determine the best dosage.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Psoriasis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultraviolet Therapy/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Costs and Cost Analysis , Dermatitis, Atopic/economics , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pruritus/economics , Pruritus/prevention & control , Psoriasis/economics , Psoriasis/therapy , Quality of Life
4.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 311(3): 221-230, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30788568

ABSTRACT

Pruritic dermatosis is a frequent and burdensome disease. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the willingness to pay (WTP) and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with pruritic dermatoses and (2) to compare the results with data on socio-demographic data, and clinical features/symptoms of the patients. One hundred and three patients with pruritic dermatosis had participated in a non-interventional, cross-sectional study. Socio-demographic data, clinical features/symptoms, a health-related quality of life (HRQoL)-based and a dermatology-specific instrument (SF-6D and DLQI, respectively), and two utility indicators such as rating scale (RS) and time-trade-off (TTO) as well as willingness to pay (WTP) were recorded. In our study, there was a significant correlation between DLQI scores and WTP (p < 0.001). Time-trade-off (TTO) was also statistically correlated with SF-6D (p = 0.001). Regression models showed that daily duration and pruritus intensity were associated with lower HRQoL. Furthermore, WTP was the only measure revealing demographic and socio-economic characteristics such as age, education level, family status and income as predicting factors. No significant differences between groups of varying skin diseases were observed. HRQoL and WTP proved to be valid tools to assess the burden of disease in patients with pruritic dermatosis. However, further research with a larger number of patients is needed to validate the present findings.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Patient Preference/economics , Pruritus/diagnosis , Pruritus/therapy , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Cost of Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pruritus/economics , Pruritus/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Young Adult
6.
Pain Pract ; 17(6): 738-746, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27611885

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia are known to have a profound effect on the patient's quality of life, but the incidence and severity of itch and its relation with pain and quality of life in the long term are still relatively unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the presence and severity of pain and itch and impact on quality of life in patients over 50 years old with HZ. METHODS: We enrolled 661 patients with HZ in this 12-month observational study. Patient data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. Outcomes were pain, itch, burden of illness, impact on patient's daily life, impact on quality of life, and healthcare costs. RESULTS: At inclusion, 94% of patients reported any pain, 74.3% significant pain, and 26% severe pain. After 3 months, 18.8% of patients suffered from postherpetic neuralgia. At inclusion, 70.8% of patients had any itch, 39.2% significant itch, and 7.3% severe itch. The occurrence of pain increases costs and has a high impact on the quality of life, lowering EQ-5D scores by an average of 18%. In contrast, itch has little effect on the quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and itch are highly prevalent months after HZ. Pain caused by HZ has a large impact on quality of life, burden of illness, impact on daily life, and health care costs for these patients. The impact of itch on quality of life is relatively small.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/epidemiology , Pruritus/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Herpes Zoster/diagnosis , Herpes Zoster/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/diagnosis , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/economics , Pruritus/diagnosis , Pruritus/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Br J Dermatol ; 158(5): 1013-21, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18363763

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Itch, a major symptom of many skin diseases, has a great impact on quality of life. The nursing programme 'Coping with itch' aims at reducing itch and at helping patients to cope with itch. OBJECTIVES: To explore costs and cost-effectiveness of the programme. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was carried out with 56 patients. Data were gathered on medical consumption, days off work and the frequency of itching and scratching. Differences between both groups, the cost-effectiveness ratio and the percentage of patients falling into the four quadrants of the cost-effectiveness analysis plane were determined. RESULTS: The intervention group experienced a gain of 6 days with little itching [95% confidence interval (CI) -16-28] at 3 months and a gain of 35 days (95% CI -33-96) at 9 months. They paid more visits to the dermatology nurse than the control group. The point estimate of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was euro129.91 and euro16.60 per day with little itching at 3 months and at 9 months, respectively. At 3 months, 70% of the patients experienced favourable results and 14% of them had lower costs. At 9 months, 87% had favourable results and 31% of them had lower costs. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the expenses associated with the 'Coping with itch' programme were incurred during the first 3 months, but the benefits in terms of days with little itch appeared to persist and increase beyond 3 months, thus leading to a more favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.


Subject(s)
Pruritus/economics , Aged , Chronic Disease , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Evaluation Research , Program Evaluation , Pruritus/nursing , Skin Diseases
8.
Ann Trop Med Parasitol ; 92 Suppl 1: S101-15, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9861275

ABSTRACT

The greatest burdens related to human onchocerciasis are the result of the eye and skin lesions and severe itching produced by the microfilariae. Although the major manifestations of the disease do show geographical variation (e.g. onchocercal blindness is not a common complication in all endemic countries), they are often sufficiently severe to prevent human use of the often very fertile land close to the rivers in which the vectors breed. Though for many years thought to be of relatively minor importance compared with onchocercal eye disease, the skin lesions of onchocerciasis have recently been shown to be a major socio-economic burden, in terms of disability-adjusted life-years. The demonstration of an excellent correlation between the prevalence of palpable nodules in a community and the community microfilarial load has led to the development of rapid, safe and non-invasive methods to assess and map the levels of endemicity across whole countries. This has enabled mass treatment with Mectizan (ivermectin, MSD) to be targeted first at hyperendemic communities. Estimates of the burden of onchocerciasis will continue to change as better means of measurement become available. It seems possible, however, that use of Mectizan will eliminate the disease before its true burden can be estimated accurately.


Subject(s)
Onchocerciasis, Ocular/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Microfilariae , Occupational Exposure , Onchocerca volvulus/isolation & purification , Onchocerciasis, Ocular/complications , Onchocerciasis, Ocular/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis, Ocular/immunology , Parasitology/methods , Pruritus/economics , Simuliidae/parasitology , Skin Diseases, Parasitic/complications , Skin Diseases, Parasitic/economics , Skin Diseases, Parasitic/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Topography, Medical
9.
Can J Anaesth ; 44(10): 1060-5, 1997 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9350364

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare both the efficacy and cost of nalbuphine and diphenhydramine in the treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus following Caesarean section. METHODS: Eighty patients, undergoing elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia, were randomized, in a prospective, double-blind trial, to receive either nalbuphine (Group NAL) or diphenhydramine (Group DIP) for the treatment of SAB morphine-induced pruritus. All patients received an intrathecal injection of 10-12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% and 200 micrograms preservative free morphine. Postoperative pruritus was assessed, using a visual analogue scale (VAS), for 24 hr. Pruritus treatment was administered upon patient request and by a nurse blinded to the treatment given. Patients who failed to respond to three doses of the study drug were deemed treatment failures. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire given 24 to 48 hr after surgery. Direct drug costs were calculated based on the pharmacy provision costs as of April 1996. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled and 45 requested treatment for pruritus. Patients treated with NAL (n = 24) were more likely to achieve a VAS score of zero with treatment (83% vs 43%, P < 0.01), had a higher delta VAS following treatment (4 +/- 2 vs 2 +/- 2, P < 0.003), and experienced fewer treatment failures (4% vs 29%, P < 0.04), than those treated with DIP (n = 21). Group NAL patients were also more likely to rate their pruritus treatment as being good to excellent (96% vs 57%, P < 0.004). Direct drug costs were higher for NAL than for DIP ($6.4 +/- 3.1 vs $1.7 +/- 0.7, respectively, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Nalbuphine is more effective than diphenhydramine in relieving pruritus caused by intrathecal morphine and the cost differences are small.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Cesarean Section , Morphine/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Pruritus/chemically induced , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/economics , Antipruritics/economics , Antipruritics/therapeutic use , Diphenhydramine/economics , Diphenhydramine/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Morphine/administration & dosage , Morphine/economics , Nalbuphine/economics , Nalbuphine/therapeutic use , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/economics , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Pruritus/economics
10.
Anesth Analg ; 82(3): 641-7, 1996 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8623975

ABSTRACT

This randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy of two mu-receptor antagonists, naloxone and nalbuphine, in the prophylactic management of pruritus in postcesarean section patients receiving epidural morphine. Dosages of study drugs were individualized by the use of a patient self-administration (PSA) device. All 51 patients were healthy women who received a uniform epidural anesthetic and epidural morphine (5 mg). Coded solutions were infused for 24 h, with 5-min PSA lockout times: Group A (n = 17), nalbuphine 2.5 mg/h, PSA nalbuphine 1 mg; Group B (n = 16), naloxone 50 micrograms/hr, PSA saline; Group C (n = 18), naloxone 50 micrograms/h, PSA naloxone 40 micrograms. Patients were assessed for pruritus and pain every 8 h for 24 h. Both naloxone and nalbuphine provided good relief for pruritus; median pain and pruritus scores were in the none-to-mild range (0-3) for all groups at all assessment intervals. The pruritus scores of the PSA saline group were higher during the 16- to 24-h period (P < 0.05) than the scores of either group receiving A-receptor antagonist by PSA. There was evidence of shortening of the duration of analgesia in patients receiving naloxone who required treatment for pruritus after 16 h. Patients who self-administered large doses of nalbuphine over the first 8 h also reported pain scores consistent with reversal of analgesia. The potency ratio for naloxone:nalbuphine for antagonism of the pruritic effects of epidural morphine was approximately 40:1. Intervention to treat either unrelieved pruritus or pain, respectively, was necessary in the following numbers of patients: Group A, 0/1; Group B, 1/1; Group C, 2/2. Prophylactic infusions offer the potential for labor cost savings by minimizing the need for episodic therapeutic interventions to treat pruritus.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Analgesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Morphine/adverse effects , Nalbuphine/therapeutic use , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Pruritus/prevention & control , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/instrumentation , Cesarean Section , Cost Savings , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Pruritus/economics , Receptors, Opioid, mu/antagonists & inhibitors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...