Chromatic aberration and spectral dependency of extended-range-of-vision intraocular lens technology.

This study compared the optical quality and chromatic performance of refractive-diffractive intraocular lenses (IOLs) that are designed to extend the range of vision of pseudophakic patients and alter chromatic aberration. Five IOLs were evaluated, Tecnis Synergy and Triumf POD L GF, both intended to compensate for eye's chromatism, as well as Acriva Trinova Pro C-a lens that increases chromatic aberration, and AT Lisa Tri and AcrySof IQ PanOptix. An optical setup composed of a corneal model inducing monochromatic and chromatic aberrations and incorporating various spectral conditions was employed. The two chromatic-aberration correcting IOLs demonstrated the lowest far-focus dispersion, but it was negative only, with the Synergy indicating its ability to reduce eye's chromatic aberration. Although the Trinova increased far-point chromatism, it was close to the level of the PanOptix, but higher than that of the AT Lisa. All the studied models demonstrated varying optical quality in response to light color. Still, the strongest spectral dependency was associated with achromatizing technology. Therefore, chromatic aberration and wavelength dependency should be considered in IOL optimization and predicting visual function, particularly in non-white spectral conditions.

One-year clinical evaluation of rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens with +1.5 diopters near addition.

We conducted a one-year prospective, multicenter study to assess clinical outcomes after implantation of segmented, rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with +1.5 diopters (D) near addition. In this phase III clinical trial, 120 eyes of 65 patients undergoing phacoemulsification and implantation of Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15 (Oculentis GmbH) were included. The ophthalmological examinations were performed before and 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, uncorrected (UIVA) and distance-corrected (DCIVA) intermediate visual acuity at 70 cm, and uncorrected (UNVA) and distance-corrected (DCNVA) near visual acuity at 30 cm were measured. A defocus curve was obtained and patients were asked about the severity of photic phenomena. Postoperative distance and intermediate visual acuity was excellent, with UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, and DCIVA of approximately 20/20, 20/16, 20/25, 20/25 were attained, respectively. The level of near visual acuity was lower; UNVA and DCNVA remained at around 20/60 and 20/70, respectively. The defocus curve indicated that postoperative uncorrected visual acuity of 20/25 and 20/40 was obtained at as close as 67 cm and 50 cm, respectively. Contrast sensitivity was within the normal range, with a minimal level of subjective symptoms and high patient satisfaction. The rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs with +1.5 D near addition provided excellent distance and intermediate vision, but near vision was not enough for reading small prints. Contrast sensitivity was high, with very low incidences of photic phenomena and a high level of patient satisfaction.

Patient outcomes following implantation with a trifocal toric IOL: twelve-month prospective multicentre study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes with a premium diffractive-refractive trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) over a 12-month period. METHODS: Multicentre prospective clinical trial including 227 eyes of 114 patients undergoing cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of the AT LISA tri toric 939MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). One patient was implanted unilaterally. Outcome measures were: visual acuity, manifest refraction, reading performance, contrast sensitivity, defocus curve, patient satisfaction and subjective quality of vision. Alpins vector analysis was used to evaluate astigmatic changes. RESULTS: 12-month follow up results of binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity were ≤0.3 logMAR in 99.0%, 98.10% and 91.40% of eyes, respectively. 79.7% of eyes had a cylinder value of ±0.50 D at 12 months post-surgery. Contrast sensitivity was in the normal range at 6 months post-surgery. The defocus curve exhibited a smooth transition between far and near foci. Vector analysis showed a mean magnitude of error of -0.16 ± 0.48 D. Mean binocular distance-corrected reading visual acuity was 0.15 ± 0.13 logRAD at 6 months postoperatively. 93.3%, 89.4% and 84.6% of patients expressed satisfaction (good or very good) with distance, intermediate and near vision, respectively, 12 months after surgery. Most (≥95%) patients felt that visual disturbances, including halos, glare, focusing difficulties and depth perception, caused little or no disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: The diffractive-refractive trifocal toric IOL, AT LISA tri toric 939MP, provides effective distance, intermediate and near visual acuity in eyes with corneal astigmatism. Patient satisfaction was high and 98.1% of patients expressed satisfaction with the IOL implanted.

Implantable Collamer Lens® for Management of Pseudophakic Ametropia in Eyes With a Spectrum of Previous Corneal Surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess the visual outcomes, predictability, and safety of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical, Inc., Monrovia, CA) for the management of residual pseudophakic refractive error. METHODS: Forty-nine pseudophakic eyes of 40 patients in which myopic, hyperopic, or toric ICLs were implanted were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-nine eyes had been implanted with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and 20 eyes had a multifocal IOL. All IOLs were implanted in the capsular bag. Of the 49 eyes included, 6 had residual refractive error after phacoemulsification without corneal pathology or surgical alteration (virgin cornea group), 12 had LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (excimer laser group), 8 had radial keratotomy, 5 had intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation, 11 had penetrating keratoplasty, and 7 had deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Uncorrected and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity and manifest refraction were evaluated. RESULTS: The efficacy/safety indices were 0.92/1.10, 0.98/1.13, 1.04/1.11, 0.90/1.13, 0.79/1.17, and 0.71/1.23 for the virgin cornea, excimer laser, radial keratotomy, ICRS, penetrating keratoplasty, and DALK groups, respectively. No eye lost one or more lines of CDVA. The virgin cornea, excimer laser, and radial keratotomy groups showed better predictability and accuracy, with 96.2% spherical equivalent within ±1.00 diopters (D). The ICRS, penetrating keratoplasty, and DALK groups demonstrated approximately 50% spherical equivalent within ±1.00 D. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Good refractive outcomes and a strong safety record support the use of the ICL for the correction of residual refractive error in pseudophakic eyes with previous corneal surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(10):654-663.].

Comparing visual acuity, range of vision and spectacle independence in the extended range of vision and monofocal intraocular lens.

IMPORTANCE: This study is the first to compare the extended range of vision (ERV) intraocular lens (IOL) targeted at micro-monovision to a monofocal targeted at binocular emmetropia. BACKGROUND: Compares visual acuity, range of vision and spectacle independence in monofocal and ERV IOLs. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight participants (176 eyes) with bilateral IOL implants at 5+ month postoperative review. METHODS: Regression analyses (general estimating equations and multiple linear regression) tested associations between IOL type (ZA9002 Tecnis 3-piece or Tecnis ZCT monofocal; and Tecnis Symfony ERV IOL) and visual acuity, adjusting for key confounders including residual astigmatism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Monocular and binocular visual acuity measured with and without distance refractive correction at distance (3.00 m), intermediate (1.00 and 0.63 m) and near (0.40 m) (logMAR units); near vision reading test used British 'N' notation; self-reported spectacle independence. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between ERV and monofocal groups in uncorrected binocular visual acuity at distance (P = 0.595). Binocular uncorrected visual acuity at intermediate (0.63 m: monofocal 0.24, ERV 0.09, P < 0.001) and near (0.40 m: monofocal 0.42, ERV 0.18, P < 0.001) were significantly better in the ERV group. Binocular uncorrected near vision: all the ERV group read N8 or better, compared to 36% in the monofocal group (P < 0.001); 93% of the ERV group reported spectacle independence at near compared to 33% in the monofocal group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ERV IOL, targeted to achieve micro-monovision, demonstrated superior range of visual acuity and spectacle independence compared to the monofocal targeted to achieve emmetropia.

Effects of Contact Lens Wear on Biometry Measurements for Intraocular Lens Calculations.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of contact lens (CL) wear on biometry measurements for cataract surgery and whether a CL hiatus can reduce the prediction error of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations. METHODS: Retrospective, interventional case series of eyes that received repeat biometry measurements for IOL calculations after discontinuing hard or soft CLs for at least 14 days. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: intersession change in axial length, average keratometry, astigmatism, and axis. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: change in recommended IOL power and toricity, postoperative refraction prediction error. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 16 patients had a mean duration of CL wear (12 hard and 20 soft) of 39.5 years (range, 29-55 years) and mean CL hiatus duration of 25 days (range, 14-56 days). Mean absolute intersession change in axial length was 0.016 mm (range, 0-0.05 mm), average keratometry 0.31 D (range, 0.02-1.01 D), astigmatism 0.41 D (range, 0.01-1.10 D), and axis 6.3° (range, 0-28°). The IOL power predicting the lowest postoperative spherical equivalent changed for 17 of 32 eyes (by 0.5 D for 12 eyes and 1.0 D for five eyes). Recommended IOL toricity changed for nine of 14 eyes (by 0.75 D for six eyes and 1.50 D for three eyes). The median absolute prediction error of IOL calculations was 0.69 D (range, 0.19-2.93 D) before and 0.57 D (range, 0.01-2.82 D) after the CL hiatus (P=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens wear may affect biometry measurements and subsequent IOL power and toricity selection. For some eyes, repeating biometry measurements after a CL hiatus may improve the accuracy of IOL calculations.

Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens.

BACKGROUND: Today, patients often expect to achieve spectacle independance after cataract surgery. New trifocal intraocular lenses have been developed to try and fullfill this demand. The purpose of this study is to report the short-term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens (AcrySof PanOptix™). METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of the study intraocular lens in a private practice clinic were considered for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were the presence of other ocular pathologies or preoperative astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D). Patients with intraoperative complications were excluded from analysis. One month after surgery patients underwent: monocular defocus curve; monocular and binocular uncorrected visual acuity in photopic and mesopic conditions, for far (4 m), intermediate (60 cm) and near (33 cm) distances and binocular contrast sensitivity. Patients completed a visual satisfaction questionnaire between 9 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen eyes of fifty-eight patients receiving bilateral implantation of the study intraocular lens were analysed. Mean binocular uncorrected visual acuity in photopic conditions was 0.03 LogMAR for far, 0.12 for intermediate and 0.02 for near distances. All patients achieved a binocular uncorrected visual acuity better than 0.3 LogMAR (20/40 Snellen equivalent) for distance and near vision and 94.8% of patients for intermediate vision. Mesopic binocular uncorrected visual acuity values were similar to photopic values. The monocular defocus curves showed that the best visual acuity was reached at a vergence of 0.00D. Visual acuity dropped slightly at -1.00D and peaked again at -2.00D. Visual acuities better than 0.2 LogMAR were maintained between -2.50D and +0.50D. Contrast sensitivity was high and similar in photopic and mesopic conditions. As regards patient-evaluated outcomes, only 2 patients (3.4%) were fairly dissatisfied with their sight after surgery. Three patients (5.1%) reported the need for spectacle correction for certain activities. All other patients (94.8%) reported never using spectacle correction. CONCLUSIONS: The PanOptix trifocal IOL provides good short-term visual outcomes, with good intermediate performance and excellent patient-reported satisfaction. The similar values achieved in mesopic and photopic conditions in binocular uncorrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity suggest low pupillary dependence for light distribution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN60143265 , retrospectively registered on the 24th of April 2017.

Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview.

Multifocal intraocular lenses are increasingly used in the management of pseudophakic presbyopia. After multifocal intraocular lens implantation, most patients do not need spectacles or contact lenses and are pleased with the result. Complications, however, may affect the patient's quality of life and level of satisfaction. Common problems with multifocal lenses are blurred vision and photic phenomena associated with residual ametropia, posterior capsule opacification, large pupil size, wavefront anomalies, dry eye, and lens decentration. The main reasons for these are failure to neuroadapt, lens dislocation, residual refractive error, and lens opacification. To avoid patient dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation, it is important to consider preoperatively the patient's lifestyle; perform an exhaustive examination including biometry, topography, and pupil reactivity; and explain the visual expectations and possible postoperative complications.

Management of subluxated capsular bag-fixated intraocular lenses using a capsular anchor.

UNLABELLED: We describe the use of the capsular anchor (AssiAnchor) to manage a subluxated intraocular lens (IOL) in the capsular bag. The anchor comprises 2 prongs that hold the anterior lens capsule and a central rod that is sutured to the scleral wall, enabling centration of the IOL-capsular bag complex. Six pseudophakic patients presenting with subluxated posterior chamber IOLs in the capsular bag were operated on using the device. The anchor was used successfully in all cases, although in 2 cases only 1 prong was placed under the capsulorhexis edge. In 1 eye, 2 anchors were used 1 month apart following repeated traumatic zonular injury. The capsular bag holding the IOL remained centered and stable throughout the follow-up period. The anchoring device, which was originally designed to preserve the lens capsule and stabilize subluxated crystalline lenses, can also be used to treat subluxation of a capsular bag-fixated IOL. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Assia is the inventor of the AssiAnchor, has a licensed patent of the anchor, and is consultant to Hanita Lenses. Dr. Lapid-Gortzak is a consultant to and speaker for Alcon Surgical, Inc., Hanita Lenses, Orca Surgical, and Sanoculis Ltd.; a speaker for Santen; and a consultant to Icon. Drs. Ton and Naftali have no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Opciones quirúrgicas en el cierre angular primario por iris en meseta / Surgical options for the primary angle closure in a plateau iris case

Se describen dos casos clínicos (hermanos), con el objetivo de mostrar diferentes opciones terapéuticas en el glaucoma por cierre angular primario por iris en meseta. El primer caso representa una paciente femenina con antecedentes de iris en meseta e iridectomía periférica quirúrgica, quien presentaba cifras de tensión intraocular elevadas y progresión del daño glaucomatoso, por lo que se decidió realizar trabeculectomía en ambos ojos, con evolución satisfactoria. El segundo caso se trata de un paciente masculino, con antecedentes de salud, quien acudió por molestias oculares. Tras examen físico oftalmológico se constató glaucoma por cierre angular por iris en meseta, con presión intraocular elevada y opacidad del cristalino asociada, por lo que se realizó trabeculectomía en ojo derecho más extracción del cristalino en ambos ojos. Como complicaciones posoperatorias presentó desprendimiento coroideo y edema macular, resueltos con tratamiento mÚdico. La trabeculectomía luego de la extracción del cristalino en ojo derecho falló, por lo que actualmente se encuentra compensado con tratamiento médico. La elección de la terapéutica adecuada debe tener en cuenta los factores fisiopatológicos involucrados y la forma de presentaciónAU)

Different therapeutic options for the primary angle closure glaucoma by plateau iris were described in two clinical cases. The first one was a female patient with a a history of plateau iris and peripheral iridectomy. Elevation of intraocular pressure and progression to glaucoma was confirmed, so it was decided to perform trabeculectomy in both eyes and the result was satisfactory. The second case was a male patient with history of health problems, who suffered with eye disturbances. After ophthalmological exam, a primary angle closure glaucoma caused by plateau iris was confirmed with marked eye hypertension and associated crystalline lens opacity. Trabeculectomy of right eye and lens extraction in both eyes was applied. Choroidal detachment and macular edema were the postoperative complications, but the medical treatment managed to solve this situation. After the lens extraction, trabeculectomy in the right eye failed and today it is compensated with medical treatment. The right therapeutic choice should take into consideration the physiopathologic factors and the form of presentation(AU)

Opciones quirúrgicas en el cierre angular primario por iris en meseta / Surgical options for the primary angle closure in a plateau iris case

Se describen dos casos clínicos (hermanos), con el objetivo de mostrar diferentes opciones terapéuticas en el glaucoma por cierre angular primario por iris en meseta. El primer caso representa una paciente femenina con antecedentes de iris en meseta e iridectomía periférica quirúrgica, quien presentaba cifras de tensión intraocular elevadas y progresión del daño glaucomatoso, por lo que se decidió realizar trabeculectomía en ambos ojos, con evolución satisfactoria. El segundo caso se trata de un paciente masculino, con antecedentes de salud, quien acudió por molestias oculares. Tras examen físico oftalmológico se constató glaucoma por cierre angular por iris en meseta, con presión intraocular elevada y opacidad del cristalino asociada, por lo que se realizó trabeculectomía en ojo derecho más extracción del cristalino en ambos ojos. Como complicaciones posoperatorias presentó desprendimiento coroideo y edema macular, resueltos con tratamiento médico. La trabeculectomía luego de la extracción del cristalino en ojo derecho falló, por lo que actualmente se encuentra compensado con tratamiento médico. La elección de la terapéutica adecuada debe tener en cuenta los factores fisiopatológicos involucrados y la forma de presentación(AU)

Different therapeutic options for the primary angle closure glaucoma by plateau iris were described in two clinical cases. The first one was a female patient with a a history of plateau iris and peripheral iridectomy. Elevation of intraocular pressure and progression to glaucoma was confirmed, so it was decided to perform trabeculectomy in both eyes and the result was satisfactory. The second case was a male patient with history of health problems, who suffered with eye disturbances. After ophthalmological exam, a primary angle closure glaucoma caused by plateau iris was confirmed with marked eye hypertension and associated crystalline lens opacity. Trabeculectomy of right eye and lens extraction in both eyes was applied. Choroidal detachment and macular edema were the postoperative complications, but the medical treatment managed to solve this situation. After the lens extraction, trabeculectomy in the right eye failed and today it is compensated with medical treatment. The right therapeutic choice should take into consideration the physiopathologic factors and the form of presentation(AU)

Positional accommodative intraocular lens power error induced by the estimation of the corneal power and the effective lens position.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictability of the refractive correction achieved with a positional accommodating intraocular lenses (IOL) and to develop a potential optimization of it by minimizing the error associated with the keratometric estimation of the corneal power and by developing a predictive formula for the effective lens position (ELP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data from 25 eyes of 14 patients (age range, 52-77 years) and undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of the accommodating IOL Crystalens HD (Bausch and Lomb) were retrospectively reviewed. In all cases, the calculation of an adjusted IOL power (P(IOLadj)) based on Gaussian optics considering the residual refractive error was done using a variable keratometric index value (n(kadj)) for corneal power estimation with and without using an estimation algorithm for ELP obtained by multiple regression analysis (ELP(adj)). P(IOLadj) was compared to the real IOL power implanted (P(IOLReal), calculated with the SRK-T formula) and also to the values estimated by the Haigis, HofferQ, and Holladay I formulas. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between P(IOLReal) and P(IOLadj) when ELP(adj) was used (P = 0.10), with a range of agreement between calculations of 1.23 D. In contrast, P(IOLReal) was significantly higher when compared to P(IOLadj) without using ELP(adj) and also compared to the values estimated by the other formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Predictable refractive outcomes can be obtained with the accommodating IOL Crystalens HD using a variable keratometric index for corneal power estimation and by estimating ELP with an algorithm dependent on anatomical factors and age.

Comparison of conventional versus crossed monovision in pseudophakia.

AIMS: To compare the visual performances and patient satisfactions of conventional monovision, which corrects the dominant eye for distance vision, and crossed monovision, which corrects the non-dominant eye for distance vision in patients with pseudophakia. METHODS: This prospective randomised study was conducted in 59 patients who underwent implantation of different targets of monofocal intraocular lens for each eye at Konkuk University Medical Center between November 2009 and August 2012. The following were examined before bilateral cataract surgery and 2 months after the surgery: refractive error, binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and stereopsis. Questionnaires to evaluate postoperative spectacle dependence and patient satisfaction were completed by all patients. RESULTS: The conventional monovision group and the crossed monovision group were composed of 28 and 31 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in postoperative UCDVA, UCNVA, BCVA and stereopsis between the two groups. In addition, patient satisfaction with near and distant vision and spectacle dependence were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of the crossed monovision were not significantly different from the results of conventional monovision. Therefore, crossed monovision can also be a valuable option for correcting postoperative presbyopia in patients considering bilateral cataract surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0001065.

Silicone oil pupil block glaucoma in a pseudophakic eye.

Intravitreal silicone oil achieves an effective endotamponade in patients with complex retinal detachments. Silicone oil displacement into the anterior chamber risks glaucoma and endothelial failure. We describe a 52-year-old patient with pseudophakia with silicone oil endotamponade presenting with visual loss and intraocular pressure of 60 mm Hg. Inferior YAG iridotomy was undertaken to repatriate silicone oil to the posterior segment. Despite normal intraocular pressure, acute corneal oedema occurred postiridotomy, resolving spontaneously over 2 weeks. Pupil block glaucoma secondary to silicone oil requires a management approach based on an understanding of silicone oil fluidics. Careful selection of inferior laser iridotomy site is critical to effectively reverse pupil block. Anterior migration of silicone oil in patients with pseudophakia is rare. We offer an hypothesis to explain unanticipated transient corneal oedema following silicone oil displacement from the anterior chamber. Clinicians must discuss the possibility of transient or permanent endothelial failure preoperatively in this patient group.

Improving visual outcomes by preserving outer retina morphology in eyes with resolved pseudophakic cystoid macular edema.

PURPOSE: To use ultra-high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) subclinical anatomic alterations to explain suboptimum vision despite pseudophakic cystoid macula edema (CME) resolution. SETTING: University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California, USA. DESIGN: Case study. METHODS: This study comprised patients who had cataract phacoemulsification surgery. Cases of resolved postoperative CME (diagnosed postoperatively by 1 month and resolved by 1 year) were included. Exclusion criteria included any other cause for decreased vision or compounding factors. Patients with a history of resolved pseudophakic CME were imaged using a purpose-built ultra-high-resolution OCT system with 4.5 µm axial resolution and an acquisition speed of 9 frames/sec (1000 A-scans/frame). The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was determined by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study standards. Statistical analysis was by the unpaired t test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The review identified 56 patients with a pseudophakic CME diagnosis at least 1 month postoperatively. Fifteen eyes (26.8%) had less than 20/20 CDVA despite resolution of CME; 7 participated. Four patients with 20/20 CDVA after resolution of pseudophakic CME participated. Eyes with reduced CDVA after macula edema showed ultra-high-resolution OCT evidence of blurring of outer segments of photoreceptors, while controls showed normal outer retina morphology (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent anatomic alteration of photoreceptors visualized by ultra-high-resolution OCT correlated with reduced CDVA in patients with pseudophakic CME compared with patients who had 20/20 CDVA after macula edema. This anatomic alteration in outer photoreceptor morphology is a plausible explanation for the reduced CDVA in this disease. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

[Pseudophakic retinal detachment: how to manage?]. / Décollement de rétine du pseudophaque : quelle prise en charge ?

INTRODUCTION: Retinal detachment, a common complication of cataract surgery, requires urgent surgical treatment. The external approach combining retinopexy with scleral buckling remains the gold standard in the surgical management of pseudophakic retinal detachment (RD) without marked proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), although intraocular surgery is currently preferred by most of the authors. The purpose of this study is to compare the anatomical and functional results obtained with both techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study compares the results of two techniques for treating pseudophakic retinal detachment: external surgery (group I), and vitrectomy with internal tamponade (group II). Ab-externo surgery was performed in 24 patients (24 eyes), while 22 patients (22 eyes) underwent primary vitrectomy. In order to make both groups comparable, we excluded recurrences of RD, vitreous hemorrhage and other media opacities, giant tears and initial grade C PVR. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Postoperative variables analyzed and compared were the rate of initial and final anatomical success, final visual acuity, and causes of failure of the initial surgery. RESULTS: The retina was reattached with a single operation in 21 eyes in group I (87.5%) and 19 eyes in group II (86.4%) (P=0.91). The causes of anatomical failure in both groups were proliferative vitreoretinopathy (4 cases) and secondary tears or tears not seen on initial examination (2 cases). For patients in group I, secondary surgery consisted of total vitrectomy with encircling buckle. Patients in group II underwent an additional vitrectomy (peeling of vitreoretinal proliferation, and silicone oil tamponade as necessary). After a mean follow-up of 12 months, the final examination noted a reattached retina in 23 eyes in group I (95.84%) and 21 eyes in group II (95.45%) (P=0.95). The final visual results were identical at comparable follow-up periods. Indeed, the final visual acuity was similar in the two groups with nearly 40% of patients having recovered visual acuity between 1/10 and 5/10 (P=0.98). CONCLUSION: With regard to surgical treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment, vitrectomy with internal tamponade provides anatomical and functional results comparable to those obtained with external surgery.

Theoretical image performance with customized aspheric and spherical IOLs - when do we get a benefit from customized aspheric design?

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Implantation of an artificial intraocular lens (IOL) during cataract surgery significantly changes the balance of aberrations in the eye. We demonstrate the theoretical superiority of customized aspheric IOL designs over standard spherical IOLs for different values of corneal curvature, asphericity and axial length. METHODS: For a selected set of corneal surfaces we calculated a best-fit equiconvex spherical IOL. In a second step we customized the IOL back surface to correct the wavefront aberrations of the cornea. Then we calculated a quadric approximation of the IOL back surface to retrieve the aspheric parameters of the customized lens in terms of radius of curvature and asphericity/conic constant. The optical performance of the three IOL models was monitored in terms of lateral ray spread (LRS) at retinal plane for variations of corneal curvatures, asphericity and axial lengths of the pseudophakic eye. RESULTS: The LRS of customized aspheric IOLs was significantly smaller compared to that of spherical IOLs (typically between 10 and 25 dB). For high aspheric coefficients the LRS increased with spherical IOLs. With aspheric IOLs LRS was higher for steep corneas paired with high aspheric coefficients, mostly due to the fitting error of the quadratic function. For several combinations of corneal curvature and aspheric coefficients the focal point of the aspheric IOL was up to 400 times smaller than the spherical one. CONCLUSION: This study appeals to the reader for the potential benefit of customized aspheric IOL design instead of the principle of a 'one size fits all' aspheric coefficient as used currently in clinical practice. A benefit with customized IOLs is less depending from the axial length and can be achieved with corneas of a moderate prolate aspheric shape with an equal or more negative Q value than the average of -0.22. Longer eyes seem to benefit less than short eyes.