Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 9.694
Filter
1.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(6): 549-559, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder require long-term antipsychotic treatment with antipsychotic medications, but poor medication adherence can lead to increased health care utilization and costs. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer potential therapeutic advantages in that they require less frequent dosing and improved medication adherence. South Carolina has the highest adoption of LAIs among US states, making it an ideal population for comparing the effectiveness of LAIs vs oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in treating schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of LAIs compared with OAPs on medication adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 1 claim for an LAI or OAP between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, aged 18 to 65, with at least 2 claims with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated using logistic regression adjusting for confounders and predictors of the outcome. We estimated the "average treatment effect on the treated" by employing PS-weighted t-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 3,531 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,537 (44.5%) treated with LAIs and 1,994 (56.5%) treated with OAPs. In PS-weighted analyses, the LAI cohort had a greater proportion of days covered than the OAP cohort with a 365-day fixed denominator (69% vs 64%; P < 0.0001), higher medication possession ratio with a variable denominator while on therapy (85% vs 80%; P < 0.0001), and higher persistence (82% vs 64%; P < 0.0001). The average number of inpatient visits and emergency department visits did not significantly differ between cohorts (0.28 hospitalizations, P = 0.90; 3.68 vs 2.96 emergency department visits, P = 0.19). The number of outpatient visits, including visits for medication administration, were greater in the LAI cohort (23.1 [SD 24.2]) vs OAP (16.9 [SD 21.2]; P < 0.0001); however, including the costs for medication administration visits, outpatient costs (per member) were approximately $2,500 lower in the LAI cohort (P < 0.0001). The number of pharmacy visits was greater in the OAP cohort (LAI 21.0 [SD 17.0] vs OAP 23.0 [SD 15.0]; P = 0.006). All-cause total costs were greater in the LAI cohort ($26,025 [SD $29,909]) vs the OAP cohort ($17,291 [SD $25,261]; P < 0.0001) and were driven by the difference in pharmaceutical costs (LAI $15,273 [SD $16,183] vs OAP $4,696 [SD $10,371]; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries, treatment with LAIs for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was associated with greater medication adherence rates. Patients using LAIs had higher drug costs and total costs, but lower outpatient and total nondrug costs compared with those using OAPs.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Delayed-Action Preparations , Medicaid , Medication Adherence , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Schizophrenia , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/economics , Male , Female , Adult , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , United States , Middle Aged , South Carolina , Administration, Oral , Young Adult , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Injections , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/economics
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 85(2)2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696137

ABSTRACT

Objective: To examine rates of clozapine use among people with psychotic disorders who experience specific indications for clozapine.Methods: Records data from 11 integrated health systems identified patients aged 18 years or older with recorded International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorder who experienced any of the 3 events between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, suggesting indications for clozapine: a diagnosis of self-harm injury or poisoning, suicidal ideation diagnosed or in response to standardized assessments, and hospitalization or emergency department (ED) care for psychotic disorder despite treatment with 2 or more antipsychotic medications. Prescription dispensing data identified all clozapine use prior to or in the 12 months following each indication event. Analyses were conducted with aggregate data from each health system; no individual data were shared.Results: A total of 7,648 patients with psychotic disorder diagnoses experienced at least 1 indication event. Among 1,097 experiencing a self-harm event, 32 (2.9%) had any prior clozapine use, and 10 (0.9%) initiated clozapine during the following 12 months. Among 6,396 with significant suicidal ideation, 238 (3.7%) had any prior clozapine use, and 70 (1.1%) initiated clozapine over 12 months. Among 881 with hospitalization or ED visit despite pharmacotherapy, 77 (8.7%) had any prior clozapine treatment, and 41 (4.7%) initiated clozapine over 12 months. Among those with significant suicidal ideation, rates of both prior clozapine treatment and subsequent initiation varied significantly by race and ethnicity, with rates among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients lower than among non Hispanic White patients.Conclusions: Initiating clozapine treatment is uncommon among people with psychotic disorders who experience events suggesting clozapine is indicated, with even lower rates among Black and Hispanic patients.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Male , Female , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Suicidal Ideation , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Young Adult , United States , Adolescent
3.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 11(6): 443-450, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Agranulocytosis is a life-threatening side-effect of clozapine, the only approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The long-term profile of this complication has not yet been well established. Here we aim to describe the risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis over the long term. METHODS: We used the entire population of Finland to identify people diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder between 1972 and 2014 and developed a Kaplan-Meier model of time to diagnosis of agranulocytosis during clozapine versus non-clozapine treatment over a 22-year observation period (1996 to 2017). Next, we developed a nested case-control model for agranulocytosis matching by sex, age, time since diagnosis, and being in the incident cohort on a 1 to 5 ratio. Various durations of use for clozapine and non-clozapine antipsychotic treatment were compared to the modal antipsychotic use duration, deriving adjusted odds ratios (aORs) in a multivariable regression model. Recurrence and lethality rates for clozapine-induced agranulocytosis were described. These data reflect on all individuals with lived experience of schizophrenia in Finland during the study time, although individuals with lived experience were not included in the design of the study. FINDINGS: We identified 61 769 people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (14 037 individuals treated with clozapine and 47 732 individuals treated with non-clozapine antipsychotics), with a mean age of 46·67 years (IQR 34·44-57·61), of whom 30 721 (49·7%) were female and 31 048 (50·3%) were male (data on ethnicity not available). Among those, 398 individuals were diagnosed with agranulocytosis (231 individuals treated with clozapine and 167 individuals treated with non-clozapine antipsychotics), representing a cumulative incidence of agranulocytosis for 1·37% (95% CI 0·58-3·16) on clozapine and 0·13% (0·04-0·23) on non-clozapine antipsychotics. In the case (n=398) versus control (n=1987) model, the risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis decreased steeply over time from an aOR of 36·01 (95% CI 16·79-77·22) for less than 6 months on clozapine to 4·38 (1·86-10·34) for clozapine use of 54 months or more. Only one of 3559 individuals starting clozapine died because of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. INTERPRETATION: The risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis decreases steeply over time but might be persistently greater than that of non-clozapine antipsychotics. This long-term risk excess seems small in absolute terms compared with the known magnitude of the advantages of clozapine in relevant outcomes, including life expectancy. Given the widespread underuse of clozapine, relaxing the long-term neutrophil monitoring could favour the advantages of long-term clozapine use, including greater life expectancy, without incurring the intolerable risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. FUNDING: Northwell Health and Sigrid Jusèlius Foundation.


Subject(s)
Agranulocytosis , Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Humans , Clozapine/adverse effects , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Agranulocytosis/chemically induced , Agranulocytosis/epidemiology , Finland/epidemiology , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
4.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 401, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811916

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Motor alterations and lowered physical activity are common in affective disorders. Previous research has indicated a link between depressive symptoms and declining muscle strength primarily focusing on the elderly but not younger individuals. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between mood and muscle strength in a sample of N = 73 young to middle-aged hospitalized patients (18-49 years, mean age 30.7 years) diagnosed with major depressive, bipolar and schizoaffective disorder, with a focus on moderating effects of psychopharmacotherapy. The study was carried out as a prospective observational study at a German psychiatric university hospital between September 2021 and March 2022. METHODS: Employing a standardized strength circuit consisting of computerized strength training devices, we measured the maximal muscle strength (Fmax) using three repetitions maximum across four muscle regions (abdomen, arm, back, leg) at three time points (t1-t3) over four weeks accompanied by psychometric testing (MADRS, BPRS, YRMS) and blood lipid profiling in a clinical setting. For analysis of psychopharmacotherapy, medication was split into activating (AM) and inhibiting (IM) medication and dosages were normalized by the respective WHO defined daily dose. RESULTS: While we observed a significant decrease of the MADRS score and increase of the relative total Fmax (rTFmax) in the first two weeks (t1-t2) but not later (both p < .001), we did not reveal a significant bivariate correlation between disease severity (MADRS) and muscle strength (rTFmax) at any of the timepoints. Individuals with longer disease history displayed reduced rTFmax (p = .048). IM was significantly associated with decreased rTFmax (p = .032). Regression models provide a more substantial effect of gender, age, and IM on muscle strength than the depressive episode itself (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study indicate that disease severity and muscle strength are not associated in young to middle-aged inpatients with affective disorders using a strength circuit as observational measurement. Future research will be needed to differentiate the effect of medication, gender, and age on muscle strength and to develop interventions for prevention of muscle weakness, especially in younger patients with chronic affective illnesses.


Subject(s)
Muscle Strength , Humans , Muscle Strength/drug effects , Muscle Strength/physiology , Male , Pilot Projects , Adult , Female , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Inpatients , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index
5.
Curr Opin Psychiatry ; 37(4): 320-330, 2024 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726815

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been an increasing focus on deprescribing in psychiatry recently, particularly of antipsychotic medication, with recognition that not all patients with psychotic disorders require lifelong medication. We summarize some empirical and theoretical papers, and examine case studies to provide instruction on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have found that slower tapering (over months or longer) of antipsychotics is associated with a lower relapse rate than quicker tapering (weeks). Case studies presented suggest that the process of reduction is associated with the precipitation or exacerbation of psychotic symptoms and that a slower process of reduction may minimize this effect. This may be because faster reductions cause greater disruption of homeostatic equilibria, provoking psychotic symptoms either as direct withdrawal symptoms or consequences of nonpsychotic withdrawal symptoms (e.g. insomnia) - although not all patients will experience withdrawal symptoms. This suggests that smaller dose reductions, especially at lower doses, made very gradually, may minimize the risk of psychotic symptoms. SUMMARY: Slower tapering of antipsychotics may provide time for adaptations made to the presence of the medications to resolve, thus reducing the disruption to homeostatic equilibrium caused by dose reduction, potentially reducing the risk of relapse. Exacerbation of psychotic symptoms on antipsychotic reduction may not represent evidence of the need for a higher dose of antipsychotic on a long-term basis but may indicate the need for more gradual reduction. Gradual reduction of antipsychotics, especially after long-term use in clinical practice is prudent.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Drug Tapering , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Deprescriptions
6.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 85(2)2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767930

ABSTRACT

Schizophrenia is a major mental illness that is managed with long-term antipsychotic medication as a standard of care. Antipsychotic medications, however, are associated with many subjective and objective adverse effects. These adverse effects have driven the study of risk-mitigation strategies such as targeted intermittent therapy and dose reduction and drug discontinuation. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of these strategies have been synthesized in meta-analysis; both strategies have been associated with no functional benefits and with an increased risk of relapse. The RCTs, however, have been criticized because, in many, patients were abruptly switched to the target dose or too rapidly tapered, thereby predisposing the RCT to failure of the intervention. Two important RCTs examined gradual individualized dose reduction and discontinuation. One, conducted in first-episode psychosis patients who were free from positive symptoms for 6 months, found that, at 18-month follow-up, dose reduction was associated with a higher risk of relapse (number needed to harm [NNH] = 5) and with no functional benefits. However, after return to routine clinical care, at a 7-year follow-up, the dose reduction group had better functional outcomes and similar clinical outcomes relative to the maintenance treatment group. The other RCT, conducted in patients with relapsing psychosis, found that, at a 2-year follow-up, dose reduction was associated with a higher risk of relapse (NNH = 5) and with no improvements in social, cognitive, quality of life, satisfaction, and other domains. Many large nationwide observational studies have found that antipsychotic discontinuation by patients with first-episode psychosis and schizophrenia is associated with increased relapse, rehospitalization, suicide mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. There is also the ethical matter that attempts to identify the few who may benefit from antipsychotic dose reduction and discontinuation may compromise the health and stability of the many who require long-term maintenance treatment.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Drug Tapering , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence
7.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 4307, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811567

ABSTRACT

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are sophisticated signaling machines able to simultaneously elicit multiple intracellular signaling pathways upon activation. Complete (in)activation of all pathways can be counterproductive for specific therapeutic applications. This is the case for the serotonin 2 A receptor (5-HT2AR), a prominent target for the treatment of schizophrenia. In this study, we elucidate the complex 5-HT2AR coupling signature in response to different signaling probes, and its physiological consequences by combining computational modeling, in vitro and in vivo experiments with human postmortem brain studies. We show how chemical modification of the endogenous agonist serotonin dramatically impacts the G protein coupling profile of the 5-HT2AR and the associated behavioral responses. Importantly, among these responses, we demonstrate that memory deficits are regulated by Gαq protein activation, whereas psychosis-related behavior is modulated through Gαi1 stimulation. These findings emphasize the complexity of GPCR pharmacology and physiology and open the path to designing improved therapeutics for the treatment of stchizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Memory Disorders , Psychotic Disorders , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A , Serotonin , Humans , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A/metabolism , Animals , Psychotic Disorders/metabolism , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Memory Disorders/metabolism , Serotonin/metabolism , Male , Signal Transduction , HEK293 Cells , Mice , Schizophrenia/metabolism , Brain/metabolism , Female , GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11/metabolism , GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11/genetics
8.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 190, 2024 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632633

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Significant elevation of creatine kinase levels (above three digits) and leucocytosis in the absence of muscle rigidity, tremors, or autonomic dysfunction can pose a real challenge in the context of antipsychotic treatment as an early herald of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: We present here two cases of adult male patients of Black British heritage, ages 51 years and 28 years, respectively. Both received a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and presented with massive increase of creatine kinase blood level after aripiprazole depot administration, one with pernicious increase associated with silent neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and the second with asymptomatic benign enzyme elevation. CONCLUSION: Though aripiprazole use is less likely to cause neuroleptic malignant syndrome, on rare occasions it can produce massive symptomatic or asymptomatic increase in serum creatine kinase enzyme levels, raising the need for close monitoring, especially at the initial doses of the drug.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Psychotic Disorders , Adult , Humans , Male , Aripiprazole , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/diagnosis , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/drug therapy , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome/etiology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Creatine Kinase
10.
Transl Psychiatry ; 14(1): 183, 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600117

ABSTRACT

Human connectome studies have provided abundant data consistent with the hypothesis that functional dysconnectivity is predominant in psychosis spectrum disorders. Converging lines of evidence also suggest an interaction between dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) cortical glutamate with higher-order functional brain networks (FC) such as the default mode (DMN), dorsal attention (DAN), and executive control networks (ECN) in healthy controls (HC) and this mechanism may be impaired in psychosis. Data from 70 antipsychotic-medication naïve first-episode psychosis (FEP) and 52 HC were analyzed. 3T Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) data were acquired from a voxel in the dACC and assessed correlations (positive FC) and anticorrelations (negative FC) of the DMN, DAN, and ECN. We then performed regressions to assess associations between glutamate + glutamine (Glx) with positive and negative FC of these same networks and compared them between groups. We found alterations in positive and negative FC in all networks (HC > FEP). A relationship between dACC Glx and positive and negative FC was found in both groups, but when comparing these relationships between groups, we found contrasting associations between these variables in FEP patients compared to HC. We demonstrated that both positive and negative FC in three higher-order resting state networks are already altered in antipsychotic-naïve FEP, underscoring the importance of also considering anticorrelations for optimal characterization of large-scale functional brain networks as these represent biological processes as well. Our data also adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the role of dACC cortical Glx as a mechanism underlying alterations in functional brain network connectivity. Overall, the implications for these findings are imperative as this particular mechanism may differ in untreated or chronic psychotic patients; therefore, understanding this mechanism prior to treatment could better inform clinicians.Clinical trial registration: Trajectories of Treatment Response as Window into the Heterogeneity of Psychosis: A Longitudinal Multimodal Imaging Study, NCT03442101 . Glutamate, Brain Connectivity and Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP), NCT02034253 .


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Connectome , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Brain , Glutamic Acid , Glutamine , Gyrus Cinguli/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Psychotic Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/pathology
11.
CNS Drugs ; 38(5): 333-347, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587586

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with the development of psychosis (PDP), including hallucinations and delusions, in more than half of the patient population. Optimal PD management must therefore involve considerations about both motor and non-motor symptoms. Often, clinicians fail to diagnosis psychosis in patients with PD and, when it is recognized, treat it suboptimally, despite the availability of multiple interventions. In this paper, we provide a summary of the current guidelines and clinical evidence for treating PDP with antipsychotics. We also provide recommendations for diagnosis and follow-up. Finally, an updated treatment algorithm for PDP that incorporates the use of pimavanserin, the only US FDA-approved drug for the treatment of PDP, was developed by extrapolating from a limited evidence base to bridge to clinical practice using expert opinion and experience. Because pimavanserin is only approved for the treatment of PDP in the US, in other parts of the world other recommendations and algorithms must be considered.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Parkinson Disease , Psychotic Disorders , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Hallucinations/complications , Hallucinations/drug therapy , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use
12.
J Psychopharmacol ; 38(4): 324-343, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38576151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may experience severe psychiatric symptoms, often unresponsive to conventional pharmacological therapies, highlighting the need for more effective alternatives. AIMS: This study aims to map and synthesize evidence on the use of clozapine as a therapeutic option for managing severe psychiatric symptomatology co-occurring with ASD. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review on multiple sources following the JBI guidelines. The search strategy was inclusive, targeting both peer-reviewed publications and gray literature presenting empirical data on the use of clozapine therapy for patients with ASD accompanied by comorbid psychiatric symptoms. Two independent evaluators performed the selection of studies, data extraction, and critical appraisal. RESULTS: The review included 46 studies, encompassing 122 ASD individuals who received clozapine therapy. The sources of evidence comprise 31 case reports, 8 case series, 6 retrospective observational studies, and 1 quasi-experimental prospective study. The tables present the findings along with a narrative summary. Clozapine treatment demonstrated benefits in four groups of severe and treatment-resistant psychiatric symptoms in ASD patients: disruptive behaviors, psychotic symptoms, catatonia, and mood symptoms. Although side effects were common, tolerability was generally satisfactory. However, severe adverse events, such as seizures, moderate neutropenia, and myocarditis, underscore the need for intensive clinical monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: While clozapine shows promise as a pharmacological intervention for severe psychopathologies in ASD, more rigorous clinical studies are required to elucidate its efficacy and safety in this population. The limited robustness of the evidence calls for caution, signaling an early research stage into this topic.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Clozapine , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Clozapine/adverse effects , Autism Spectrum Disorder/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy
13.
Br J Psychiatry ; 224(5): 164-169, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of people with clozapine-treated schizophrenia develop 'checking' compulsions, a phenomenon yet to be understood. AIMS: To use habit formation models developed in cognitive neuroscience to investigate the dynamic interplay between psychosis, clozapine dose and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS). METHOD: Using the anonymised electronic records of a cohort of clozapine-treated patients, including longitudinal assessments of OCS and psychosis, we performed longitudinal multi-level mediation and multi-level moderation analyses to explore associations of psychosis with obsessiveness and excessive checking. Classic bivariate correlation tests were used to assess clozapine load and checking compulsions. The influence of specific genetic variants was tested in a subsample. RESULTS: A total of 196 clozapine-treated individuals and 459 face-to-face assessments were included. We found significant OCS to be common (37.9%), with checking being the most prevalent symptom. In mediation models, psychosis severity mediated checking behaviour indirectly by inducing obsessions (r = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04-0.09; P < 0.001). No direct effect of psychosis on checking was identified (r = -0.28, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.03; P = 0.340). After psychosis remission (n = 65), checking compulsions correlated with both clozapine plasma levels (r = 0.35; P = 0.004) and dose (r = 0.38; P = 0.002). None of the glutamatergic and serotonergic genetic variants were found to moderate the effect of psychosis on obsession and compulsion (SLC6A4, SLC1A1 and HTR2C) survived the multiple comparisons correction. CONCLUSIONS: We elucidated different phases of the complex interplay of psychosis and compulsions, which may inform clinicians' therapeutic decisions.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant , Humans , Clozapine/adverse effects , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Longitudinal Studies , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant/genetics , Middle Aged , Compulsive Behavior/chemically induced , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/drug therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/chemically induced , Schizophrenia/drug therapy
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(14): e37730, 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579062

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Turner syndrome (TS) is a genetic disorder associated with partial or complete monosomy X abnormalities; some patients may have a higher risk of psychiatric symptoms. Catatonia is associated with a wide range of life-threatening complications with complex pathogenesis; However, It very rare for patients with TS to develop psychotic symptoms and eventually progress to catatonia. This case report describes the diagnostic and therapeutic course of catatonia-associated TS. PATIENT CONCERNS: In this study, we report the case of a patient with TS who initially developed sudden hallucinations, delusions, and emotional instability, followed by catatonia. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with: unspecified catatonia; TS. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment included administering a combination of esazolam injections and olanzapine tablets, placing a gastric tube and urinary catheter, and providing nutritional support. OUTCOMES: After treatment, the patient's hallucinations, delusions, and catatonia disappeared, with no residual sequelae, and social functioning returned to normal. LESSONS: For patients with TS who present with psychotic symptoms and catatonia, a comprehensive evaluation is necessary, and treatment with antipsychotics and benzodiazepines is effective.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Catatonia , Psychotic Disorders , Turner Syndrome , Humans , Catatonia/etiology , Catatonia/therapy , Catatonia/diagnosis , Turner Syndrome/complications , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Hallucinations/complications
16.
J Psychiatr Res ; 174: 1-7, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598974

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increased risk for somatic comorbidity in individuals with schizophrenia has been well established. In addition, psychiatric patients with somatic illnesses are more likely to have more psychiatric readmissions. Increased burden of treatment related to chronic somatic comorbidities may be associated with lower adherence to psychiatric medication. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 275 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. A general practitioner performed a complete physical health checkup for all participants, including a complete medical examination and laboratory tests. Patients' adherence, attitudes, insight, and side-effects were evaluated using the Attitudes toward Neuroleptic Treatment Scale. Overall symptomatology was measured using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Regression analysis was used to investigate interactions and associations among health beliefs, disease burden, and treatment adherence. Separate regression models were utilized to account for the complexity of health behavior and treatment adherence pathways. RESULTS: Patients' somatic comorbidity and health behavior were not associated with adherence or attitudes toward antipsychotic treatment. High dose of antipsychotics and obesity were related to the need for medical interventions, while a healthy diet reduced the risk. Higher BPRS score and older age were associated with having somatic symptoms. Somatic comorbidities had no negative effects on treatment adherence or attitudes. CONCLUSION: This study focuses on exploring possible associations between health beliefs and treatment adherence pathways in patients with psychotic disorders. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no evidence to support our health belief and diseases burden models and their associations.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Comorbidity , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Adult , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/therapy , Treatment Adherence and Compliance/statistics & numerical data
17.
Schizophr Res ; 267: 301-307, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder were at heightened risk for interruptions in psychiatric care during the coronavirus-19 (COVID 19) pandemic. There is limited work exploring the pandemic's impact on emergency department (ED) visit volume, use of restraint and parenteral medications, inpatient psychiatric (IP) hospitalization, and ED length of stay (LOS) among this population. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 2134 ED visits with a billing code for psychosis between March 1, 2019-February 28, 2021. We used Poisson regression analysis to compare ED visit volume between the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods. Restraint use, parenteral antipsychotic or benzodiazepine use, IP hospitalization, and ED LOS were compared between the two periods using chi-square tests and independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: Overall volume of psychosis-related ED visits during the pandemic did not differ significantly from the prior year. Rates of restraint use (16.2 % vs 11.6 %, p < .01), parenteral antipsychotic (22.6 % vs 14.9, p < .001), and parenteral benzodiazepine (22.3 % vs 16.3 %, p < .001) use were significantly higher during the pandemic. Fewer patients had an IP hospital disposition during the pandemic than the year prior (57.8 % vs. 61.9 %, p < .05). ED LOS was longer during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (28.37 h vs 20.26 h, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the volume of psychosis-related ED visits remained constant, restraint and parenteral medication use rates were significantly higher during the pandemic. ED LOS increased but fewer ED visits resulted in IP hospitalization. These findings underscore the importance of planning for increased acuity of psychosis ED presentations during public health emergencies.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitalization , Length of Stay , Psychotic Disorders , Restraint, Physical , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Male , Female , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Restraint, Physical/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/therapy , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Emergency Room Visits
19.
Psychiatry Res ; 336: 115895, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642423

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Differences in trial design may affect estimates of efficacy of psychotropic drugs. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate whether the use of Olanzapine (OLZ) as either investigational or control drug affects the observed efficacy of OLZ. METHODS: We performed a search for Randomized-Controlled Trials (RCTs) in which the efficacy of OLZ is assessed in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. We assessed overall efficacy of OLZ and performed subgroup analyses of studies with OLZ as intervention or comparator. Mixed-effect meta-regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 25 RCTs included, OLZ was considered as investigational drug or active control in 13 and 12 studies, respectively. The reduction of PANSS score was greater in trials in which OLZ was used as investigational drug. Multivariate meta-regression models showed that a higher PANSS score at baseline and trial duration were the main predictors of greater PANSS score reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Trials with OLZ used as investigational drug differ from those of trials with OLZ as comparator for baseline PANSS scores and study duration; these differences may produce differences in estimates of efficacy. As a consequence, the severity of illness at enrollment and trial duration should be carefully considered to ensure the reliability of indirect comparisons among antipsychotics.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Olanzapine , Psychotic Disorders , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Schizophrenia , Olanzapine/therapeutic use , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Research Design , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use
20.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(5): 347-358, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613254

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Antiseizure medication (ASM) add-on to clozapine may be efficient to target clozapine-resistant mood or psychotic symptoms or clozapine-related adverse drug reactions (ADR) such as seizures. We aimed to synthesize the information relevant for clinical practice on the risks and benefits of clozapine-ASM co-prescription. AREAS COVERED: Articles were identified with MEDLINE, Web of Sciences and PsycINFO search from inception through October 2023. The review was restricted to ASM with mood-stabilizing properties or with potential efficacy for resistant psychotic symptoms (valproate (VPA), lamotrigine, topiramate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine). EXPERT OPINION: VPA add-on to clozapine is associated with a high risk of serious ADR (myocarditis, neutropenia, pneumonia) mostly explained by complex time-dependent drug-drug interactions. The initial inhibitory effects on clozapine metabolism require slow titration to avoid immuno-allergic reactions. After the titration period, VPA has mainly inductive effects on clozapine metabolism that are more marked in smokers requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. Lamotrigine and topiramate add-on may be recommended as the first-line treatment for clozapine-related seizures, but there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy of this strategy for clozapine-resistant psychotic symptoms. Carbamazepine should not be co-prescribed with clozapine because of its potential for agranulocytosis and for inducing clozapine metabolism.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Drug Interactions , Drug Monitoring , Drug Therapy, Combination , Seizures , Humans , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Clozapine/adverse effects , Clozapine/administration & dosage , Drug Monitoring/methods , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Seizures/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...