Recent progress on the discovery of P2Y14 receptor antagonists.

The P2Y14 receptor (P2Y14R), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), is activated by extracellular nucleotides. P2Y14R is involved in inflammatory, diabetes, immune processes and other related complications, and is therefore an attractive therapeutic target. As the three-dimensional structure of the P2Y14R has not yet been elucidated, homology modeling based on the crystallography of the closely related P2Y12R have been used in the structure-based design of P2Y14R ligands. Several P2Y14R antagonists with excellent potency and high subtype-selectivity have been discovered in recent years. In this review, development of novel small molecules as antagonists of P2Y14R was described.

Pharmacological inhibition of platelet reactivity. Clinical and pharmacodynamic effects.

Platelets play an important role in both normal hemostasis and pathological thrombus formation. The key role of platelets in thrombosis is highlighted by the clinical benefit of treatment with antiplatelet drugs. Aspirin, either alone or in combination with clopidogrel in high-risk patients, is the most widely used antiplatelet agent. However, there is an individual response to these agents that may reduce the cardiovascular protection in patients who achieve a lower antiplatelet effect. Recently, P2Y12 receptor antagonists more potent than clopidogrel (e.g., prasugrel and ticagrelor) have been approved for patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions; these drugs provide greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. However, the increased effectiveness of these treatments has underscored the importance of carefully balancing the risks of ischemia and bleeding to achieve the best clinical outcomes. The increased knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of platelet activation has prompted a search for novel pharmacological targets for the inhibition of platelet reactivity. This article reviews the molecular mechanisms of action and limitations of use of current and emerging antiplatelet agents for treatment of cardiovascular disease.

The discovery and development of prasugrel.

INTRODUCTION: Prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315) is a third-generation thienopyridine, which gained approval by the FDA in 2009 for its use in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. AREAS COVERED: This article focuses on the preclinical profile of prasugrel. Using published preclinical and clinical studies, the authors summarize the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of prasugrel and their distinguishing features in efficacy and safety. EXPERT OPINION: Prasugrel has a more rapid, more potent antiplatelet effect with less interindividual response variability when compared to clopidogrel. Those therapeutic advantages are attributed to features of its chemical structure that favor the metabolic conversion of prasugrel to its active metabolite. However, the increased risk of bleeding has been associated with a greater antiplatelet effect and dosing profile; this is especially the case in those patients who are at a higher risk of bleeding complications. It is therefore important for an optimal dosing strategy of prasugrel to be identified to provide a formulation that has the best balance for efficacy and safety.

A phase 1 study of prasugrel in patients with sickle cell disease: pharmacokinetics and effects on ex vivo platelet reactivity.

AIMS: Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist that inhibits ADP-mediated platelet activation and aggregation. Accordingly, it may be useful in reducing platelet-related ischaemia in sickle cell disease (SCD). Exposure to prasugrel's active metabolite (Pras-AM) and its antiplatelet activity in SCD have not been investigated. METHODS: Thirteen adult patients with SCD and an equal number of matched healthy control subjects were studied before and after 12 days of 5.0 or 7.5 mg day(-1) prasugrel treatment. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), impedance aggregometry (MEA), VerifyNow® P2Y12, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation and Plateletworks. Exposure to Pras-AM was also assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with SCD showed increased platelet reactivity vs. healthy control subjects with VerifyNow (408 vs. 323 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), respectively, P = 0.003) and MEA (106 vs. 77 area under the aggregation curve (AU.min), P = 0.002); lower platelet reactivity index with VASP flow cytometry (59 vs. 79% platelet reactivity index (PRI), P = 0.018); and no significant differences with LTA, VASP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or Plateletworks. Relative to baseline, prasugrel significantly reduced platelet reactivity by all assays in both populations (all P < 0.05). Prasugrel was well tolerated, with no bleeding-related events in patients with SCD. The mean concentration-time profiles of Pras-AM were comparable between healthy subjects and patients with SCD following a single 10 mg prasugrel dose and following the 12th dose of 7.5 or 5 mg prasugrel. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate that in response to prasugrel, patients with SCD and healthy subjects have similar degrees of platelet inhibition and exposure to Pras-AM, and provide a basis for further study of prasugrel in patients with SCD.

Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The effect of intensified platelet inhibition for patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who do not undergo revascularization has not been delineated. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized trial, in a primary analysis involving 7243 patients under the age of 75 years receiving aspirin, we evaluated up to 30 months of treatment with prasugrel (10 mg daily) versus clopidogrel (75 mg daily). In a secondary analysis involving 2083 patients 75 years of age or older, we evaluated 5 mg of prasugrel versus 75 mg of clopidogrel. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 17 months, the primary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke among patients under the age of 75 years occurred in 13.9% of the prasugrel group and 16.0% of the clopidogrel group (hazard ratio in the prasugrel group, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.05; P=0.21). Similar results were observed in the overall population. The prespecified analysis of multiple recurrent ischemic events (all components of the primary end point) suggested a lower risk for prasugrel among patients under the age of 75 years (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.00; P=0.04). Rates of severe and intracranial bleeding were similar in the two groups in all age groups. There was no significant between-group difference in the frequency of nonhemorrhagic serious adverse events, except for a higher frequency of heart failure in the clopidogrel group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation, prasugrel did not significantly reduce the frequency of the primary end point, as compared with clopidogrel, and similar risks of bleeding were observed. (Funded by Eli Lilly and Daiichi Sankyo; TRILOGY ACS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699998.).

Bleeding complications with the P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.

AIMS More intense platelet-directed therapy for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may increase bleeding risk. The aim of the current analysis was to determine the rate, clinical impact, and predictors of major and fatal bleeding complications in the PLATO study. METHODS AND RESULTS PLATO was a randomized, double-blind, active control international, phase 3 clinical trial in patients with acute ST elevation and non-ST-segment elevation ACS. A total of 18 624 patients were randomized to either ticagrelor, a non-thienopyridine, reversibly binding platelet P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, or clopidogrel in addition to aspirin. Patients randomized to ticagrelor and clopidogrel had similar rates of PLATO major bleeding (11.6 vs. 11.2%; P = 0.43), TIMI major bleeding (7.9 vs. 7.7%, P = 0.56) and GUSTO severe bleeding (2.9 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.22). Procedure-related bleeding rates were also similar. Non-CABG major bleeding (4.5 vs. 3.8%, P = 0.02) and non-procedure-related major bleeding (3.1 vs. 2.3%, P = 0.05) were more common in ticagrelor-treated patients, primarily after 30 days on treatment. Fatal bleeding and transfusion rates did not differ between groups. There were no significant interactions for major bleeding or combined minor plus major bleeding between treatment groups and age ≥75 years, weight <60 kg, region, chronic kidney disease, creatinine clearance <60 mL/min, aspirin dose >325 mg on the day of randomization, pre-randomization clopidogrel administration, or clopidogrel loading dose. CONCLUSION Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel was associated with similar total major bleeding but increased non-CABG and non-procedure-related major bleeding, primarily after 30 days on study drug treatment. Fatal bleeding was low and did not differ between groups.

Thienopyridines, but not elinogrel, result in off-target effects at the vessel wall that contribute to bleeding.

Clinical studies with clopidogrel or prasugrel show that although increased inhibition of P2Y(12) and platelet function improves efficacy, bleeding is also increased. Other preclinical and clinical studies have suggested a greater therapeutic index (TI) with reversible inhibitors and disproportionate effects of thienopyridines on bleeding at high doses. We used multiple in vivo (FeCl(3)-induced arterial thrombosis in mesenteric arteries, blood loss after tail transsection, and platelet deposition and wound closure time in a micropuncture model in mesenteric veins) and ex vivo (light transmittance aggregometry, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time) mouse models to 1) compare the TI of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and elinogrel, a reversible, competitive antagonist, with that in P2Y(12)(-/-) mice and 2) determine whether the bleeding consequences of the thienopyridines are attributed only to the inhibition of P2Y(12). Data indicated greater (elinogrel) and decreased (thienopyridines) TI compared with that in P2Y(12)(-/-) mice. The impaired TI associated with the thienopyridines was not attributed to non-P2Y(12) activities on platelet function or coagulation but was related to a direct effect at the vessel wall (inhibition of vascular tone). Further analysis showed that the prasugrel off-target effect was dose- and time-dependent and of a reversible nature. In conclusion, the TI of thienopyridines in the mouse may be decreased by P2Y(12)-independent off-target effects at the vessel wall, whereas that of elinogrel may be enhanced by the reversible, competitive nature of the antiplatelet agent.

Ticagrelor: a novel reversible oral antiplatelet agent.

The complex mechanism of platelet activation creates an optimal target for pharmacological treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Current antiplatelet medications that are used in addition to aspirin include the thienopyridines, clopidogrel and prasugrel, but there are several limitations to the use of these medications. Clopidogrel and prasugrel irreversibly bind to the P2Y12 receptor, creating a prolonged antiplatelet effect which can be undesirable when surgery is needed. Clopidogrel requires hepatic activation and produces variable platelet inhibition based on genetic polymorphisms. Prasugrel has more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel but carries with it an increased risk of serious bleeds. Ticagrelor is a drug in a new chemical class that reversibly binds the P2Y12 receptor and noncompetitively blocks adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet activation. It was specifically designed to address the limitations of the available antiplatelet agents while maintaining comparable or better antiplatelet effects. It does not require metabolic activation and demonstrates greater platelet inhibition, a faster offset of action and comparable bleeding risk compared to clopidogrel. The pivotal PLATO (The Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial in patients with an acute coronary syndrome demonstrated improved cardiovascular outcomes, including a reduction in myocardial infarctions and vascular events using ticagrelor as compared to clopidogrel with comparable rates of major bleeds. A puzzling finding from that trial was the lack of benefit with ticagrelor in patients enrolled from the United States, which has led to ticagrelor not being approved at this time in this country. The main adverse events with ticagrelor are bleeding and dyspnea, the latter of which is of unclear etiology and of unknown long-term clinical concern. In summary, ticagrelor is an exciting new oral antiplatelet drug that seems to be more efficacious than clopidogrel, with comparable safety. Whether issues of geographic disparities in response and the unusual side effect of dyspnea ultimately prove problematic has yet to be determined. Nonetheless, ticagrelor is a drug that has the potential to change the standard of care of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Oral antiplatelet agents in ACS: from pharmacology to clinical differences.

Antiplatelet agents play an essential role in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Numerous clinical trials have established the value of antiplatelet therapies for ACS. Aspirin (ASA), thienopyridines and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists comprise the major classes of antiplatelet therapies demonstrated to be of benefit in the treatment of ACS. Thienopyridines are a class of drugs that function via inhibition of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 platelet receptors. Currently, clopidogrel, a second generation thienopyridine, is the main drug of choice and the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is administered orally for the treatment of ACS. Recently, a third generation of thienopyridines has been introduced represented by prasugrel that has demonstrated promising results in ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A number of nonthienopyridine oral antiplatelet drugs are under development, and one of them, ticagrelor has already been tested in a major phase III clinical trial, PLATO, with the inclusion of a broad spectrum of patients with ACS. The present review aims to discuss the present knowledge about the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet treatment of patients with ACS.