Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 313(4): 245-253, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32620994

ABSTRACT

Hospital admission is often necessary for management of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), including wound care and pain control. No large-scale controlled studies examined the burden of hospitalization for PG. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence, predictors, outcomes, and costs of hospitalization for PG in United States adults. Data were analyzed from the 2002 to 2012 National Inpatient Sample, including a 20% representative sample of United States hospitalizations. The prevalence of hospitalization for PG increased between 2002 and 2012. Primary admission for PG was associated with age 40-59 years, female sex, black race/ethnicity, second-quartile household income, public or no insurance, and multiple chronic conditions. PG admissions were more likely at teaching and medium or large hospitals. Geometric-mean length and cost of hospitalization were higher in inpatients with vs. without a primary diagnosis of PG. The majority of inpatients with PG were classified with minor (64.4%) or moderate (25.7%) likelihood of dying, but moderate (52.5%) and major (28.7%) loss of function. PG was associated with numerous other health disorders. The limitation of this study is the lack of data on PG treatment. This study demonstrated a substantial and increasing inpatient burden of PG in the United States, with considerable disability and mortality risk, multiple comorbid health disorders, and costs.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Health Care Costs/trends , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Patient Admission/economics , Patient Admission/trends , Prevalence , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/economics , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 177(6): 1527-1536, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28391619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a painful, ulcerating skin disease with poor evidence for management. Prednisolone and ciclosporin are the most commonly used treatments, although not previously compared within a randomized controlled trial (RCT). OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness of ciclosporin and prednisolone-initiated treatment for patients with PG. METHODS: Quality of life (QoL, EuroQoL five dimensions three level questionnaire, EQ-5D-3L) and resource data were collected as part of the STOP GAP trial: a multicentre, parallel-group, observer-blind RCT. Within-trial analysis used bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with multiple imputation of missing data, informing a probabilistic assessment of incremental treatment cost-effectiveness from a health service perspective. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, when compared with prednisolone, ciclosporin was cost-effective due to a reduction in costs [net cost: -£1160; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2991 to 672] and improvement in QoL (net QALYs: 0·055; 95% CI 0·018-0·093). However, this finding appears driven by a minority of patients with large lesions (≥ 20 cm2 ) (net cost: -£5310; 95% CI -9729 to -891; net QALYs: 0·077; 95% CI 0·004-0·151). The incremental cost-effectiveness of ciclosporin for the majority of patients with smaller lesions was £23 374/QALY, although the estimate is imprecise: the probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of £20 000/QALY was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the clinical findings of the STOP GAP trial, patients with small lesions should receive treatment guided by the side-effect profiles of the drugs and patient preference - neither strategy is clearly a preferred use of National Health Service resources. However, ciclosporin-initiated treatment may be more cost-effective for patients with large lesions.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/economics , Dermatologic Agents/economics , Prednisolone/economics , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Facilities and Services Utilization , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Humans , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/drug therapy , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Single-Blind Method , State Medicine/economics , United Kingdom
4.
Trials ; 13: 51, 2012 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22540770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare inflammatory skin disorder characterised by painful and rapidly progressing skin ulceration. PG can be extremely difficult to treat and patients often require systemic immunosuppression. Recurrent lesions of PG are common, but the relative rarity of this condition means that there is a lack of published evidence regarding its treatment. A systematic review published in 2005 found no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) relating to the treatment of PG. Since this time, one small RCT has been published comparing infliximab to placebo, but none of the commonly used systemic treatments for PG have been formally assessed. The UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network's STOP GAP Trial has been designed to address this lack of trial evidence. METHODS: The objective is to assess whether oral ciclosporin is more effective than oral prednisolone for the treatment of PG. The trial design is a two-arm, observer-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial comparing ciclosporin (4 mg/kg/day) to prednisolone (0.75 mg/kg/day). A total of 140 participants are to be recruited over a period of 4 years, from up to 50 hospitals in the UK and Eire. Primary outcome of velocity of healing at 6 weeks is assessed blinded to treatment allocation (using digital images of the ulcers). Secondary outcomes include: (i) time to healing; (ii) global assessment of improvement; (iii) PG inflammation assessment scale score; (iv) self-reported pain; (v) health-related quality of life; (vi) time to recurrence; (vii) treatment failures; (viii) adverse reactions to study medications; and (ix) cost effectiveness/utility. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of PG (excluding granulomatous PG); measurable ulceration (that is, not pustular PG); and patients aged over 18 years old who are able to give informed consent are included in the trial. Randomisation is by computer generated code using permuted blocks of randomly varying size, stratified by lesion size, and presence or absence of underlying systemic disease (for example, rheumatoid arthritis).Patients who require topical therapy are asked to enter a parallel observational study (case series). If topical therapy fails and systemic therapy is required, participants are then considered for inclusion in the randomised trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials: ISRCTN35898459. Eudract No.2008-008291-14.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/drug therapy , Research Design , Administration, Oral , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Cyclosporine/economics , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Dermatologic Agents/economics , Drug Costs , Humans , Ireland , Patient Selection , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Prednisolone/adverse effects , Prednisolone/economics , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/economics , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/pathology , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , Wound Healing/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...