Lopinavir cerebrospinal fluid steady-state trough concentrations in HIV-infected adults.

BACKGROUND: The central nervous system may act as a sanctuary site for viral replication in the setting of low antiretroviral penetration. Data on lopinavir cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) trough concentration (C(trough)) values have yet to be reported. OBJECTIVE: To describe lopinavir CSF C(trough) values and compare them with a measure of HIV susceptibility. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label design, HIV-infected adults whose regimen included lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100-mg soft-gel capsules twice daily for at least 4 weeks were enrolled. Each subject had 8 plasma lopinavir concentrations determined over a 12-hour dosing interval and 1 CSF lopinavir C(trough) value determined at the end of the study. Linear regression methods tested for associations between CSF or CSF to plasma concentration ratio and covariates including pharmacokinetic parameters and CSF protein. RESULTS: Ten patients (7 male; median [range] +/- SD age 45.3 +/- 2.8 y) completed the study. Median (intraquartile range [IQR]) lopinavir plasma 0- to 12-hour area under the curve (AUC(0-12)) and minimum concentrations were 71.3 h x microg/mL (48.4-87.6) and 3.82 microg/mL (2.76-5.34). Median (IQR) CSF C(trough), paired plasma concentration, and time since last dose were 11,200 pg/mL (6760-16,400), 5.42 microg/mL (3.88-5.85), and 9.9 hours (9.7-10.2), respectively. Median (IQR) CSF to plasma concentration ratio was 0.225% (0.194-0.324). Lopinavir CSF C(trough) was above the median 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) for wild-type HIV-1 (wtHIV-1) (1900 pg/mL) in all subjects. Lopinavir plasma AUC(0-12) (r(2) = 0.65; p = 0.009) and CSF protein (r(2) = 0.26; p = 0.006) were associated with lopinavir CSF concentration, while CSF protein (r(2) = 0.66; p = 0.008) was associated with CSF to plasma concentration ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Lopinavir CSF C(trough) was above the median IC(50) for wtHIV-1 replication in all patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100-mg soft-gel capsules twice daily.

Determination of lopinavir cerebral spinal fluid and plasma ultrafiltrate concentrations by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry.

A method for the determination of lopinavir (LPV) concentrations in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and plasma ultrafiltrate (UF) was developed and validated to analyze clinical specimens from patients receiving antiretroviral treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir. The CSF (400 microL sample volume) final calibration range for LPV was 0.313-25.0 ng/mL. The final calibration range for UF (50 microL sample volume) was 1.25-100 ng/mL. The samples were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction, concentrated, and analyzed using a reversed phase isocratic separation. Detection was achieved in positive mixed reaction monitoring mode on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Isolation of LPV through chromatographic separation and proper selection of calibration matrix were important factors in achieving accurate results. Plasma UF was found to be an equivalent calibration matrix to CSF whereas plasma matrix produced a positive bias in samples with unknown concentrations. Artificial CSF media prepared chemically were biased and less superior than UF. Sources of plasma for the UF did not affect accuracy. Several CSF sources were tested for specificity of the method and LPV concentrations were accurately produced with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source producing more accurate results than the electrospray source. The method successfully measured LPV concentrations in CSF that were previously undetectable by HPLC as well as UF from protein binding studies.

Lopinavir concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid exceed the 50% inhibitory concentration for HIV.

INTRODUCTION: Lopinavir (LPV) is highly bound to plasma proteins and is a substrate for active drugs transporters, which may greatly limit the access of LPV to the central nervous system (CNS). However, even low lopinavir concentrations may be sufficient to inhibit HIV replication. Prior anecdotal reports indicated that lopinavir concentrations were below detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). METHODS: LPV was measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry in 31 CSF-plasma pairs from 26 HIV-infected individuals who were taking LPV-containing antiretroviral regimens. The lower limit of quantification was 3.7 microg/l. RESULTS: Seven of the sample pairs had very low plasma (and CSF) LPV concentrations, with a mean estimated plasma trough of 274 microg/l (range, < 3.7 to 608; typical trough values approximately 4000 microg/l), suggesting poor recent adherence. In the remaining 24 sample pairs, the median LPV concentration was 5889 microg/l [interquartile range (IQR), 4805-9620] and all CSF samples had measurable LPV concentrations: median 17.0 microg/l (IQR, 12.1-22.7). The median CSF-plasma ratio was 0.23% (range, 0.12-0.75). All CSF concentrations in these samples were more than double the 50% inhibitory concentration for wild-type HIV virus. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with typical plasma levels of LPV, the drug is detectable in the CSF at concentrations that exceed those needed to inhibit HIV replication. Despite being > 98% bound to plasma proteins, LPV penetrates into the CNS and may contribute to the control of HIV in this potential reservoir.

Lopinavir/ritonavir combined with twice-daily 400 mg indinavir: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in blood, CSF and semen.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the steady-state blood plasma (BP), CSF and seminal plasma (SP) pharmacokinetics (PK) of twice-daily indinavir 400 mg and lopinavir/ritonavir. METHODS: Ten HIV-1-positive men on lopinavir/ritonavir participated in a PK study. PK sampling was performed before and 2 weeks after adding indinavir to lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimens. BP, CSF and SP RNA levels, CD4 counts and blood chemistry were checked at baseline and 2 weeks after indinavir. RESULTS: At baseline: lopinavir parameters (n=10) in BP were within expected levels. Median lopinavir trough concentrations (n=5) in CSF and SP were below the limit of detection (BLD) (i.e. <10 ng/mL) and 248 ng/mL (range 96-2777), respectively. After indinavir: lopinavir C(max), C(min) and AUC(0-12) increased by 9%, 46% and 20%, respectively (P<0.32, P<0.32 and P<0.20). In two of four men lopinavir concentrations in CSF were detectable at 27 and 29 ng/mL. Median SP lopinavir concentration was 655 ng/mL (20-2734). Median indinavir PK parameters were C(max) 3365 ng/mL (range 2130-5194), C(min) 293 ng/mL (14-766), T(max) 2.25 h (1-3), AUC(0-12) 22452 ng/mL.h (11243-33661), and t(1/2) 2.8 h (1.4-3.7). Median indinavir concentrations in CSF and SP were 39 ng/mL (21-86) and 592 ng/mL (96-983). Two of eight men who initially had detectable BP viral load (VL) became BLD (<50 copies/mL) after the addition of indinavir, and in 2/4 men with low-level viraemia in SP (BPVL BLD) their SPVL became BLD after addition of indinavir. CONCLUSIONS: Adding indinavir 400 mg twice daily to lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimens did not significantly alter the median lopinavir PK parameters. However, wide interpatient variability in lopinavir concentrations was seen. In contrast plasma indinavir levels were >80 ng/mL in seven of eight plasma samples, and all CSF and semen samples collected.

Differences in the detection of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors in non-blood compartments: clinical correlations.

PURPOSE: To study the presence of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), semen, and lymph nodes and to assess the correlations with residual viral replication in these compartments. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of sanctuary samples from 41 HIV-infected patients on stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens containing indinavir, nelfinavir, or lopinavir combined with ritonavir (lopinavir/r) and a longitudinal analysis of PI levels and HIV-1 RNA in plasma and CSF of 6 additional patients on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r monotherapy (3 cases each). Plasma, CSF, semen, and a lymph node (LN) biopsy were taken on the same day. Samples were assayed for PI concentrations, HIV-1 RNA levels, and, when detectable, sequencing of the reverse transcriptase and protease genes on seminal viral RNA. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional analysis, the CSF/plasma ratio was 0.14 for indinavir. Nelfinavir and lopinavir/r were consistently undetectable in CSF. The semen/plasma ratio was 1.9 for indinavir, 0.07 for nelfinavir, and 0.07 for lopinavir. The LN/plasma ratio was 2.07 for indinavir, 0.58 for nelfinavir, 0.21 for lopinavir, and 0.64 for ritonavir. Plasma HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in 28 patients and was detectable in 13 patients. HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in CSF samples when plasma RNA was undetectable. Three semen samples taken from patients with viremia <50 copies/mL showed detectable HIV-1 RNA with resistance mutations. HIV-1 RNA was detectable in all LNs, with no differences in patients on indinavir compared with those on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r. In the longitudinal analysis, HIV-1 RNA decreased in the plasma of the 6 patients on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r monotherapy, although CSF HIV-1 RNA decreased only in patients on lopinavir/r. CONCLUSION: Major differences exist between PIs in terms of detection in non-blood compartments. An undetectable PI level in CSF does not rule out drug activity in the brain for lopinavir/r, although this is not the case for nelfinavir. Poor penetration of PIs in semen in some patients can lead to double nucleoside therapy in this compartment. The persistence of HIV-1 RNA in LNs does not seem to be related to PI levels in this tissue.

Blood-cerebrospinal fluid and blood-brain barriers imaged by 18F-labeled metabolites of 18F-setoperone studied in humans using positron emission tomography.

18F-Setoperone, a sensitive radioligand for brain serotonin 5-HT2 receptor positron emission tomography studies, is metabolized into 18F-labeled metabolites, which participate in blood 18F radioactivity. Its main metabolite, identified as reduced 18F-setoperone, was synthesized and studied in humans to determine if 18F-labeled metabolites of 18F-setoperone (a) enter into the brain, (b) bind to the 5-HT2 receptor, and (c) explain the increase of 18F radioactivity in the free fraction in blood measured following 18F-setoperone injection. After reduced 18F-setoperone injection, the brain-to-blood 18F radioactivity concentration ratio (a) was low, at the beginning, indicating that this metabolite did not cross the blood-brain barrier; (b) was increased thereafter, with a higher radioactivity level in the choroid plexus than in brain tissue, suggesting a blood-CSF barrier crossing due to radioligand hydrophilicity; and (c) showed similar kinetics for cerebellum and frontal cortex, indicating that radioactive metabolites of 18F-setoperone did not bind to the 5-HT2 receptor. Because hydrophilic 18F-labeled metabolites of 18F-setoperone increased 18F radioactivity in the free fraction in blood, we quantified the relation between 18F-setoperone metabolism and free fraction kinetics in blood. A significant negative correlation was found between metabolism and free fraction rate constants in blood, showing it was possible to predict the 18F-setoperone metabolism rate using free fraction kinetics in blood. This will allow us to avoid the use of radio-TLC, a reference method that is difficult to use when multiple samples must be analyzed. A hydrophilic positron-emitter radioligand could also be used to study the blood-CSF barrier.