Isolated spontaneous posterior interosseous nerve palsy: a review of aetiology and management.

Isolated posterior interosseous nerve palsy is an uncommon condition and its management is controversial. Existing literature is sparse and a treatment algorithm based on existing best evidence is absent. A comprehensive review was undertaken to elucidate the causes of spontaneous posterior interosseous nerve palsy and suggest a management strategy based on the current evidence. Posterior interosseous nerve palsy can be broadly categorized as compressive and non-compressive, and the existing evidence supports surgical intervention for compressive palsy. For posterior interosseous nerve pathology with no compressive lesion on imaging, conservative management should be tried first. Surgery is therefore reserved for compressive lesions and for failure of conservative management. The commonly performed operative procedures include decompression and neurolysis, neurorrhaphy and nerve grafting, and tendon transfers with or without nerve grafting performed as a salvage procedure. The prognosis is poorer in patients aged > 50 years, those with a delay to surgery, and those who have had long-standing compression with severe fascicular thinning.

Radial Nerve Palsy After Humeral Shaft Fractures: The Case for Early Exploration and a New Classification to Guide Treatment and Prognosis.

Radial nerve palsies are a common complication associated with humeral shaft fractures. The authors propose classifying these injuries into 4 types based on intraoperative findings: type 1 stretch/neuropraxia, type 2 incarcerated, type 3 partial transection, and type 4 complete transection. The initial management of radial nerve palsies associated with closed fractures of the humerus remains a controversial topic, with early exploration reserved for open fractures, fractures that cannot achieve an adequate closed reduction requiring fracture repair, fractures with associated vascular injuries, and polytrauma patients. Outside of these recommendations, expectant observation for spontaneous recovery is recommended.

Posterior interosseous neuropathy: Supinator syndrome vs fascicular radial neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the spatial pattern of lesion dispersion in posterior interosseous neuropathy syndrome (PINS) by high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography. METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. In 19 patients with PINS and 20 healthy controls, a standardized magnetic resonance neurography protocol at 3-tesla was performed with coverage of the upper arm and elbow (T2-weighted fat-saturated: echo time/repetition time 52/7,020 milliseconds, in-plane resolution 0.27 × 0.27 mm2). Lesion classification of the radial nerve trunk and its deep branch (which becomes the posterior interosseous nerve) was performed by visual rating and additional quantitative analysis of normalized T2 signal of radial nerve voxels. RESULTS: Of 19 patients with PINS, only 3 (16%) had a focal neuropathy at the entry of the radial nerve deep branch into the supinator muscle at elbow/forearm level. The other 16 (84%) had proximal radial nerve lesions at the upper arm level with a predominant lesion focus 8.3 ± 4.6 cm proximal to the humeroradial joint. Most of these lesions (75%) followed a specific somatotopic pattern, involving only those fascicles that would form the posterior interosseous nerve more distally. CONCLUSIONS: PINS is not necessarily caused by focal compression at the supinator muscle but is instead frequently a consequence of partial fascicular lesions of the radial nerve trunk at the upper arm level. Neuroimaging should be considered as a complementary diagnostic method in PINS.

Current approach to radial nerve paralysis.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify all potential points of radial nerve compression and other likely causes of radial nerve injury. 2. Accurately diagnose both surgical and nonsurgical causes of radial nerve paralysis. 3. Define a safe and effective approach to the surgical release and reconstruction of the radial nerve. Radial nerve paralysis, which can result from a complex humerus fracture, direct nerve trauma, compressive neuropathies, neuritis, or (rarely) from malignant tumor formation, has been reported throughout the literature, with some controversy regarding its diagnosis and management. The appropriate management of any radial nerve palsy depends primarily on an accurate determination of its cause, severity, duration, and level of involvement. The radial nerve can be injured as proximally as the brachial plexus or as distally as the posterior interosseous or radial sensory nerve. This article reviews the etiology, prognosis, and various treatments available for radial nerve paralysis. It also provides a new classification system and treatment algorithm to assist in the management of patients with radial nerve palsies, and it offers a simple, five-step approach to radial nerve release in the forearm.

Posterior interosseous syndrome revisited.

The question of how the supinator syndrome and the posterior interosseous syndrome are (or are not) related has not been well discussed in the literature. The anatomy of the radial nerve and its innervations is quite variable, as are the etiology, presentation, and clinical findings in the lesions of the posterior interosseous nerve. The present study was based on a retrospective review of the electrodiagnostic records of 12 patients with involvement of the deep radial nerve (posterior interosseous nerve) diagnosed at the EMG lab of New York University Medical Center from 1975 to 1983. Two-thirds of these patients had electrophysiologic abnormalities of the supinator muscle, and in the remainder, the supinator was not involved. All superficial radial nerves had normal evoked mode action potential amplitudes and latencies. We propose that the supinator syndrome is a special case of the posterior interosseous syndrome.