Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 96(3): 340-343, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31550178

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The potential for individual radiosensitivity and radiosusceptibility testing, both in clinical practice and in systems of radiological protection, raises complex ethical considerations which must be addressed both in relation to the scientific research looking at the issues themselves, and in relation to any systems of safety and protection which are then proposed for introduction.Methods: This paper uses ethical principles for radiological protection derived by the ICRP together with other biomedical principles, to identify and evaluate some of the ethical issues associated with radiosensitivity testing.Results and conclusions: Although the evaluation is not exhaustive, it illustrates a range of different ethical aspects that would need to be considered, prior to making recommendations for how the field might better address these challenges in its future development.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Medical , Radiation Oncology/ethics , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Tolerance , Humans , International Cooperation , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Monitoring/ethics , Radiation, Ionizing , Risk Assessment
2.
Ann ICRP ; 47(1): 1-65, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29457463

ABSTRACT

Abstract ­: Despite a longstanding recognition that radiological protection is not only a matter of science, but also ethics, ICRP publications have rarely addressed the ethical foundations of the system of radiological protection explicitly. The purpose of this publication is to describe how the Commission has relied on ethical values, either intentionally or indirectly, in developing the system of radiological protection with the objective of presenting a coherent view of how ethics is part of this system. In so doing, it helps to clarify the inherent value judgements made in achieving the aim of the radiological protection system as underlined by the Commission in Publication 103. Although primarily addressed to the radiological protection community, this publication is also intended to address authorities, operators, workers, medical professionals, patients, the public, and its representatives (e.g. NGOs) acting in the interest of the protection of people and the environment. This publication provides the key steps concerning the scientific, ethical, and practical evolutions of the system of radiological protection since the first ICRP publication in 1928. It then describes the four core ethical values underpinning the present system: beneficence/ non-maleficence, prudence, justice, and dignity. It also discusses how these core ethical values relate to the principles of radiological protection, namely justification, optimisation, and limitation. The publication finally addresses key procedural values that are required for the practical implementation of the system, focusing on accountability, transparency, and inclusiveness. The Commission sees this publication as a founding document to be elaborated further in different situations and circumstances.


Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring/ethics , Radiation Protection/standards , Humans
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 144(1-4): 525-9, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21068015

ABSTRACT

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations for occupational exposed pregnant women do not imply necessarily the complete avoidance of work with radiation or radioactive materials. Instead, a careful review of the exposure conditions, once the pregnancy is declared, as part of the exercise of the ICRP optimisation principle (based in a teleological ethics point of view) is suggested. The dose limitation (following a deontological ethics point of view) of the fetus/embryo is, however, not clearly well established as happens in the case of workers or members of the public. Also, the justification of practices (to continue to work or not with radiation or radioactive materials) is not clearly addressed in most national or international recommendations. An analysis of this justification (bearing in mind both teleological and deontological ethics) is examined in this work having in mind the best interest of the child-to-be as well as other existing social and economical factors.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Environmental Exposure , Ethics, Medical , Female , Gamma Rays , Humans , Informed Consent , International Cooperation , Maternal Exposure , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/ethics , Radiation Protection/standards , Risk , X-Rays
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...