Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20.003
Filter
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(8): 763-769, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712384

ABSTRACT

Veterinary practitioners and other personnel involved in the examination are exposed to ionizing radiation while performing portable radiographs on horses. An online survey was distributed to all Veterinary Council of Ireland-registered practices where the self-reported practice profile is at least 20% equine work. The survey contained questions relating to radiation safety training, protocols, personal dosimetry and lead protection usage, repeat exposures, sedation, and personnel roles during the examination. The aim of the survey was to document the current radiation safety practices of equine veterinary practitioners during portable radiography. The results showed that although adherence to guidance set out by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reasonably good, compliance rates can be improved. Personal dosemeter usage and repeat rate reduction could particularly benefit from further improvement. This is of the utmost importance in ensuring that occupational radiation exposure to veterinary practitioners is kept to an absolute minimum during their daily practice.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiation Protection , Ireland , Horses , Animals , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Radiography/statistics & numerical data , Radiography/standards , Radiography/adverse effects , Veterinarians , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/analysis
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(8): 779-790, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767288

ABSTRACT

Photon energy is higher than the (γ,n) threshold, allowing it to interact with the nuclei of materials with high z properties and liberate fast neutrons. This represents a potentially harmful source of radiation for humans and the environment. This study validated the Monte Carlo simulation, using the particle and heavy-ion transport code system (PHITS) on a TrueBeam 10-MV linear particle accelerator's head shielding model and then used this PHITS code to simulate a photo-neutron spectrum for the transport of the beam. The results showed that, when comparing the simulated to measured PDD and crosslines, 100% of the γ-indexes were <1 (γ3%/3mm) for both simulations, for both phase-space data source and a mono energy source. Neutron spectra were recorded in all parts of the TrueBeam's head, as well as photon neutron spectra at three points on the beamline.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Monte Carlo Method , Neutrons , Particle Accelerators , Photons , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Humans , Radiation Protection/methods , Heavy Ions , Radiation Dosage , Head/radiation effects , Radiometry/methods
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(8): 802-807, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773775

ABSTRACT

Interventional cardiology is characterized by high radiation exposure for both the patient and the operator. Adequate shielding and monitoring of the operator are fundamental to comply with radiation protection principles. In a previous work, the effect on the dose of the dosemeter position on the chest was studied. In this paper, the investigation has been completed, employing an anthropomorphic thorax phantom, equipped with arms. Although there are differences between the Monte Carlo simulations and the measurements, similar trends are observed, showing that the reduction in dose, due to the arms, is between 20 and 60%, compared with the situation without arms. For that reason, considering a dosemeter placed on the chest, the upper position, which is the least affected by the arms, should be preferred while the extreme lateral position, near the armpit, should be avoided.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Monte Carlo Method , Occupational Exposure , Phantoms, Imaging , Protective Clothing , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection , Humans , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Cardiology/methods , Medical Staff , Thorax/radiation effects
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(8): 745-754, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702838

ABSTRACT

This study analysed the occupational dose in Korean pressurized heavy-water reactors (PHWRs) and identified tasks involving high radiation exposure. The average individual dose was sufficiently low to be below the annual effective dose limit for radiation workers and is even lower than the dose limit for the general public. However, some workers received relatively higher doses than others. Furthermore, most PHWR workers are exposed to radiation during planned maintenance periods. In this study, the radiation dose was normalized (radiation dose per unit time) to determine the high-radiation-exposure tasks in Korean PHWRs. Consequently, end-fitting lapping, delayed neutron tube work and fuel channel fixed-end change tasks were identified as high-radiation-exposure tasks in Korean PHWRs. If appropriate radiation protection measures are prioritized for the identified high-dose exposure tasks, optimization of radiological protection will be effectively achieved by reducing the dose that is relatively higher than the average.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Humans , Republic of Korea , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Nuclear Reactors , Water
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(8): 770-778, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726990

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the dose reduction using gonad shielding (GS) during pelvic imaging. Three types of pelvic images (radiography, magnetic resonance and computed tomography) were fused to elucidate the three-dimensional relationship between the position of ovaries and GS. To estimate the dose received by the ovaries, the off-axis dose at any given depth was measured under two different imaging conditions using thermoluminescence dosemeters and a polymethyl methacrylate phantom. The mean ovarian depth was 8.4 cm. The mean estimated ovarian dose without an additional filter was 0.36 mGy without GS and 0.14 mGy with GS. The mean estimated ovarian dose with an additional filter was 0.24 mGy without GS and 0.10 mGy with GS. The efficacy of ovarian dose reduction should be evaluated based on the achieved ovarian dose, considering the ovarian depth and use of additional filtration, rather than the ovarian protection rate of GS.


Subject(s)
Ovary , Pelvis , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Female , Humans , Radiation Protection/methods , Ovary/radiation effects , Ovary/diagnostic imaging , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Gonads/radiation effects
6.
Med Phys ; 51(6): 4423-4433, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The newly available ZAP-X stereotactic radiosurgical system is designed for the treatment of intracranial lesions, with several unique features that include a self-shielding, gyroscopic gantry, wheel collimation, non-orthogonal kV imaging, short source-axis distance, and low-energy megavoltage beam. Systematic characterization of its radiation as well as other properties is imperative to ensure its safe and effective clinical application. PURPOSE: To accurately determine the radiation output of the ZAP-X with a special focus on the smaller diameter cones and an aim to provide useful recommendations on quantification of small field dosimetry. METHODS: Six different types of detectors were used to measure relative output factors at field sizes ranging from 4 to 25 mm, including the PTW microSilicon and microdiamond diodes, Exradin W2 plastic scintillator, Exradin A16 and A1SL ionization chambers, and the alanine dosimeter. The 25 mm cone served as the reference field size. Absolute dose was determined with both TG-51-based dosimetry using a calibrated PTW Semiflex ion chamber and measurements using alanine dosimeters. RESULTS: The average radiation output factors (maximum deviation from the average) measured with the microDiamond, microSilicon, and W2 detectors were: for the 4 mm cone, 0.741 (1.0%); for the 5 mm cone: 0.817 (1.0%); for the 7.5 mm cone: 0.908 (1.0%); for the 10 mm cone: 0.946 (0.4%); for the 12.5 mm cone: 0.964 (0.2%); for the 15 mm cone: 0.976 (0.1%); for the 20 mm cone: 0.990 (0.1%). For field sizes larger than 10 mm, the A1SL and A16 micro-chambers also yielded consistent output factors within 1.5% of those obtained using the microSilicon, microdiamond, and W2 detectors. The absolute dose measurement obtained with alanine was within 1.2%, consistent with combined uncertainties, compared to the PTW Semiflex chamber for the 25 mm reference cone. CONCLUSION: For field sizes less than 10 mm, the microSilicon diode, microDiamond detector, and W2 scintillator are suitable devices for accurate small field dosimetry of the ZAP-X system. For larger fields, the A1SL and A16 micro-chambers can also be used. Furthermore, alanine dosimetry can be an accurate verification of reference and absolute dose typically measured with ion chambers. Use of multiple suitable detectors and uncertainty analyses were recommended for reliable determination of small field radiation outputs.


Subject(s)
Radiometry , Radiosurgery , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Reference Standards
7.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776882
9.
Radiat Res ; 201(5): 369-370, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714320
10.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692267

ABSTRACT

The European as low as reasonably achievable(ALARA) network regularly organises workshops on topical issues in radiation protection (RP). The topic of the 20th workshop was: 'ALARA for interventional radiology (IR) and nuclear medicine (NM)'. The objective was to examine the challenges faced when applying the optimisation principle (ALARA) in IR and NM and to consider how ALARA could be better implemented for patient and staff exposures. This memorandum provides a synthesis of the workshop sessions, and recommendations coming from the working groups discussion. Parallels are drawn with the recommendations arising from the 13th EAN workshop on 'ALARA and the medical sector (2011)' to consider how the optimisation challenges in IR and NM have evolved over the past decade. Current levels of exposure are presented along with operational practice and the challenges and opportunities for improvement, both in monitoring and practice. Whilst RP challenges remain, the application of ALARA appears more established in IR compared with experiences reported in 2011. The application of ALARA to emerging technologies in the NM setting is in need of further development to ensure that RP is considered at all stages in the development process of new radiopharmaceuticals. Besides the obvious technical and operational aspects, the importance of education and training, human factors and broadly the RP 'culture' were deemed fundamental to the success of the application of ALARA and where further emphasis is needed. All concerned parties, medical physics experts (MPEs), radiation protection experts, clinical staff, manufacturers and regulators have a role to play in the application of ALARA and this is discussed in the memorandum. Many of the recommendations from the 13th EAN workshop remain applicable today and overlap with the recommendations arising from the 20th workshop. This should prompt attention given that the use of IR and the development of novel radiopharmaceuticals for NM is only anticipated to increase with time.


Subject(s)
Nuclear Medicine , Radiation Protection , Radiology, Interventional , Humans , Europe , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control
11.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752775
12.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701771

ABSTRACT

Given the new recommendations for occupational eye lens doses, various lead glasses have been used to reduce irradiation of interventional radiologists. However, the protection afforded by lead glasses over prescription glasses (thus over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been considered in detail. We used a phantom to compare the protective effects of such eyewear and regular eyewear of 0.07 mm lead-equivalent thickness. The shielding rates behind the eyewear and on the surface of the left eye of an anthropomorphic phantom were calculated. The left eye of the phantom was irradiated at various angles and the shielding effects were evaluated. We measured the radiation dose to the left side of the phantom using RPLDs attached to the left eye and to the surface/back of the left eyewear. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded good protection against x-rays from the left and below; the average shielding rates on the surface of the left eye ranged from 0.70-0.72. In clinical settings, scattered radiation is incident on physicians' eyes from the left and below, and through any gap in lead glasses. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded better protection than regular eyewear of the same lead-equivalent thickness at the irradiation angles of concern in clinical settings. Although clinical evaluation is needed, we suggest over-glasses-type Pb eyewear even for physicians who do not wear prescription glasses.


Subject(s)
Eye Protective Devices , Eyeglasses , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Humans , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Phantoms, Imaging , Eye/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control
13.
Radiography (Lond) ; 30(3): 1014-1020, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704978

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medical imaging examinations that make use of ionising radiation provide valuable information towards patient management. Literature suggests that there is a significant rise in the number of patient referrals for such examinations. The concept "individual patient radiation dose tracking" (IPRDT) is introduced to optimise radiation monitoring. Many countries across the globe explored and implemented methods to enhance and promote the justification and optimisation principles essential for patient radiation safety. In South Africa (SA), however, attention to IPRDT is limited. METHODS: A qualitative research design was employed. Radiographers in the Western Cape Province of SA were purposefully sampled for participation in one-on-one, semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was applied to the transcribed interview data. RESULTS: This paper presents a theme developed from the radiographer cohort of ten (10) participants. The theme: the need for creating awareness and implementing legislative support structures, was developed from the data, with the following supporting subthemes: 1) stakeholder awareness and 'buy-in' 2) continuous professional development and 3) mandated practice. CONCLUSION: This study provides findings that are of value for patient radiation safety in SA by giving a voice to local stakeholders. Other countries that are conducting similar research investigations toward the integration of an IPRDT model, method, or framework, may also benefit from these findings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The effective integration of IPRDT into the clinical environment requires unison amongst the relevant stakeholders and clarity on the various professionals' roles and responsibilities. The findings of this study furthermore suggest the involvement of regulatory organisations for the provision of a mandated form of practice at national and international levels.


Subject(s)
Qualitative Research , Radiation Dosage , Humans , South Africa , Patient Safety , Interviews as Topic , Male , Female , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , Radiation Protection
14.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722292

ABSTRACT

According to International Commission of Radiological Protection, the equivalent dose limit for the eye lens for occupational exposure is recommended to be 20 mSv yr-1, averaged over 5 years, with no single year above 50 mSv. Some studies reported the measurement of assistant's lens exposure in diagnostic computed tomography (CT) examinations, but further investigation is still required in the association between the lens dose for assistants and various dose parameters. Therefore, we measured the assistant's lens exposure using small optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters. The type of occupation, type of assistance, total scan time, total mAs, total scan length, and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded and analyzed in association with air kerma at the lens position. The assistance was classified into four types: 'assisted ventilation,' 'head holding,' 'body holding,' and 'raising patient's arm.' The air kerma of lens position was not significantly different for each assistance type (p< 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). Further, the lens doses for assistants correlated with DLP, but with various strengths of correlation with the assistance type and were influenced by the distance from the CT gantry. In conclusion, lens dose during assistance and DLP demonstrated the strongest correlation. 'Raising patient's arm' and 'head holding' exhibited stronger correlations, which required less table movement during the CT scan than 'assisted ventilation' and 'body holding'.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Humans , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Protection , Radiation Exposure/analysis
16.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 10(4)2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697045

ABSTRACT

Whole-body counters (WBC) are used in internal dosimetry forin vivomonitoring in radiation protection. The calibration processes of a WBC set-up include the measurement of a physical phantom filled with a certificate radioactive source that usually is referred to a standard set of individuals determined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The aim of this study was to develop an anthropomorphic and anthropometric female physical phantom for the calibration of the WBC systems. The reference female computational phantom of the ICRP, now called RFPID (Reference Female Phantom for Internal Dosimetry) was printed using PLA filament and with an empty interior. The goal is to use the RFPID to reduce the uncertainties associated within vivomonitoring system. The images which generated the phantom were manipulated using ImageJ®, Amide®, GIMP®and the 3D Slicer®software. RFPID was split into several parts and printed using a 3D printer in order to print the whole-body phantom. The newly printed physical phantom RFPID was successfully fabricated, and it is suitable to mimic human tissue, anatomically similar to a human body i.e., size, shape, material composition, and density.


Subject(s)
Phantoms, Imaging , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Whole-Body Counting , Humans , Female , Whole-Body Counting/methods , Calibration , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/instrumentation , Anthropometry
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10719, 2024 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729975

ABSTRACT

The shielding parameters can vary depending on the geometrical structure of the linear accelerators (LINAC), treatment techniques, and beam energies. Recently, the introduction of O-ring type linear accelerators is increasing. The objective of this study is to evaluate the shielding parameters of new type of linac using a dedicated program developed by us named ORSE (O-ring type Radiation therapy equipment Shielding Evaluation). The shielding evaluation was conducted for a total of four treatment rooms including Elekta Unity, Varian Halcyon, and Accuray Tomotherapy. The developed program possesses the capability to calculate transmitted dose, maximum treatable patient capacity, and shielding wall thickness based on patient data. The doses were measured for five days using glass dosimeters to compare with the results of program. The IMRT factors and use factors obtained from patient data showed differences of up to 65.0% and 33.8%, respectively, compared to safety management report. The shielding evaluation conducted in each treatment room showed that the transmitted dose at every location was below 1% of the dose limit. The results of program and measurements showed a maximum difference of 0.003 mSv/week in transmitted dose. The ORSE program allows for the shielding evaluation results to the clinical environment of each institution based on patient data.


Subject(s)
Particle Accelerators , Radiation Protection , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/methods , Humans , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Radiation Dosage
18.
J Gastroenterol ; 59(6): 437-441, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703187

ABSTRACT

Fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures, including gastrointestinal stenting, balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), are essential for diagnosis and treatment in gastroenterology. Such procedures involve radiation exposure that necessitates strict safety measures to protect patients, doctors, and medical staff. The April 2020 update to Japan's Ionizing Radiation Injury Prevention Regulations for occupational exposure reduced the lens exposure dose limit to approximately one-seventh of its previous level. This change highlights the need for improved safety protocols. Without adaptation, the sustainability of fluoroscopy-based endoscopic techniques could be at risk due to the potential to exceed these new limits. This review examines the current state of medical radiation exposure in the field of gastroenterology in Japan and discusses the findings of the REX-GI study.


Subject(s)
Gastroenterology , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Protection , Humans , Japan , Gastroenterology/methods , Gastroenterology/standards , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Fluoroscopy/methods , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage
19.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722296

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the occupational doses (eye lens, extremities and whole body) in paediatric cardiac interventional and diagnostic catheterization procedures performed in a paediatric reference hospital located in Recife, Pernambuco. For eye lens dosimetry, the results show that the left eye receives a higher dose than the right eye, and there is a small difference between the doses received during diagnostic (D) and therapeutic (T) procedures. The extrapolated annual values for the most exposed eye are close to the annual limit. For doses to the hands, it was observed that in a significant number of procedures (37 out of 45 therapeutic procedures, or 82%) at least one hand of the physician was exposed to the primary beam. During diagnostic procedures, the physician's hand was in the radiation field in 11 of the 17 catheterization procedures (65%). This resulted in a 10-fold increase in dose to the hands. The results underscore the need for optimization of radiation safety and continued efforts to engage staff in a radiation safety culture.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiation Dosage , Humans , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Child , Cardiac Catheterization , Radiation Protection , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Radiography, Interventional , Radiation Exposure/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...