Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 25(5): 1425-1446, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30357561

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to investigate radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging as a form of sociotechnical experimentation and the kinds of sociotechnical futures at stake in this experimentation. For this purpose, a detailed analysis of a publicly available promotional video by a tag producer for the fashion industry, a sector widely using RFID tags, was analysed in detail. The results of the study indicated that the sociotechnical imaginary of RFID tagging gravitates around the core value of perfect sociotechnical efficiency. This demands a high degree of readiness to engage in standardization efforts, which performs a specific materialized understanding of ethics by other means. Furthermore, the analysis points to the importance of considering the spatiotemporal dimensions in which RFID tags work when reflecting on how this technology matters to society. Finally, the analysis shows a tacit effort to keep RFID technology and thus any questions of responsible innovation confined to the shop floor. However, given the spreading of the use of RFIDs, much wider-ranging considerations are called for.


Subject(s)
Privacy , Radio Frequency Identification Device/ethics , Social Responsibility , Social Values , Spatio-Temporal Analysis , Clothing , Humans , Industry/ethics , Internet of Things , Video Recording
3.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 26(4): 370-6, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20923593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess empirically the social and ethical risks associated with implantable radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices. METHODS: Qualitative research included observational studies in twenty-three U.S. hospitals that have implemented new patient identification systems and eighty semi-structured interviews about the social and ethical implications of new patient identification systems, including RFID implants. RESULTS: The study identified three primary social and ethical risks associated with RFID implants: (i) unfair prioritization of patients based on their participation in the system, (ii) diminished trust of patients by care providers, and (iii) endangerment of patients who misunderstand the capabilities of the systems. CONCLUSIONS: RFID implants may aggravate inequalities in access to care without any clear health benefits. This research underscores the importance of critically evaluating new healthcare technologies from the perspective of both normative ethics and empirical ethics.


Subject(s)
Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Radio Frequency Identification Device/ethics , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Patient Identification Systems/ethics , Risk Assessment , United States
5.
Appetite ; 53(3): 322-31, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19631704

ABSTRACT

The implementation of traceability in the food supply chain has reinforced adoption of technologies with the ability to track forward and trace back product-related information. Based on the premise that these technologies can be used as a means to provide product-related information to consumers, this paper explores the perceived benefits and drawbacks of such technologies. The aim is to identify factors that influence consumers' perceptions of such technologies, and furthermore to advise the agri-food business on issues that they should consider prior to the implementation of such technologies in their production lines. For the purposes of the study, a focus group study was conducted across 12 European countries, while a set of four different technologies used as a means to provide traceability information to consumers was the focal point of the discussions in each focus group. Results show that the amount of and confidence in the information provided, perceived levels of convenience, impact on product quality and safety, impact on consumers' health and the environment, and potential consequences on ethical and privacy liberties constitute important factors influencing consumers' perceptions of technologies that provide traceability.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Electronic Data Processing , Food Technology/methods , Information Management/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Electronic Data Processing/ethics , Europe , Female , Fishes , Focus Groups , Food Labeling , Food Supply/instrumentation , Food Technology/ethics , Fruit , Humans , Information Management/ethics , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Privacy , Product Recalls and Withdrawals , Radio Frequency Identification Device/ethics , Safety
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...