Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 130
Filter
1.
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol ; 25: 249-264, 2020 Dec.
Article in English, Ukrainian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33361839

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the key environmental determinants that shape the response of the social environment tothe activities of nuclear power plants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The poll was conducted in the observation zone (OZ) of the South-Ukrainian NPP (SUNPP).A repetition-free probabilistic selection was used in the population survey. The sample of respondents from the population of the SUNPP OZ was 322 people with the sampling error of 5.4 % and confidence interval of 95.0%. An ordinal 5-point measurement scale was used to assess the quality of life and anxiety, and nominal measurement scaleswere used for other issues. All the age groups of population from 20 to 65 years were taken into account. The sociohygienic, sociological, statistical and mathematical research methods were applied in the process of work (relativevalues, averages, reliability of paired differences according to Student's t test). RESULTS: The level of perception of radiation risk by the population of the NPP OZ was the lowest among respondentsof satellite cities of Rivne NPP (RNPP) and SUNPP compared to the population of rural settlements and cities of theOZ. Storage and shipment of radioactive waste are the determinant among the factors that form an environmentalthreat to the population of OZ as a result of NPP activities. Social factors that determine the assessment of environmental safety of NPP activities are employment at the NPP, place of residence, gender, age, level of education of thepopulation, etc. The «Ch-image¼ of the ecological catastrophe formed in the population of Ukraine as a result of theChNPP accident , regardless of the place of residence on the territory of Ukraine, influences behavior, formation ofplans and assessments, especially in population living near the ionizing radiation sources. CONCLUSION: The current legislation governing the relationship between functioning NPPs and the communities inwhich they are located needs to be improved, guided by the basic principle of environmental public health - socialjustice, i.e. the human right to a healthy environment. It means that the settlements of the OZ (communities)receive funds to compensate for risk living in compliance with certain safety rules to maintain health. Legal regulation and constant awareness of population are the main directions for the formation of adequate assessments.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Nuclear Energy/ethics , Nuclear Power Plants/ethics , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Chemical Safety/methods , Chernobyl Nuclear Accident , Educational Status , Environment , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nuclear Power Plants/supply & distribution , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ukraine/epidemiology
2.
New Solut ; 28(2): 240-261, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409383

ABSTRACT

Radioactive materials for the medical, technological, and industrial sectors have been effectively regulated in the United States since as early as 1962. The steady increase in the exploration and production of shale gas in recent years has led to concerns about exposures to Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) and Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM) in oil and gas waste streams. This study applied policy surveillance methods to conduct a cross-sectional fifty-state survey of law and regulations of NORM and TENORM waste from oil and gas operations. Results indicated that seventeen states drafted express regulations to reduce exposure to oil and gas NORM and TENORM waste. States with active oil and gas drilling that lack regulations controlling exposure to NORM and TENORM may leave the public and workers susceptible to adverse health effects from radiation. The study concludes with recommendations in regard to regulating oil and gas NORM and TENORM waste.


Subject(s)
Hydraulic Fracking/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Natural Gas , Occupational Health , Refuse Disposal/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
3.
J Environ Radioact ; 178-179: 439-445, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28427815

ABSTRACT

For the first time, a system for specific consideration of radiological environmental protection has been applied in a major license application in Sweden. In 2011 the Swedish Nuclear Fuel & Waste Management Co. (SKB) submitted a license application for construction of a geological repository for spent nuclear fuel at the Forsmark site. The license application is supported by a post-closure safety assessment, which in accordance with regulatory requirements includes an assessment of environmental consequences. SKB's environmental risk assessment uses the freely available ERICA Tool. Environmental media activity concentrations needed as input to the tool are calculated by means of complex biosphere modelling based on site-specific information gathered from site investigations, as well as from supporting modelling studies and projections of future biosphere conditions in response to climate change and land rise due to glacial rebound. SKB's application is currently being reviewed by the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM). In addition to a traditional document review with an aim to determine whether SKB's models are relevant, correctly implemented and adequately parametrized, SSM has performed independent modelling in order to gain confidence in the robustness of SKB's assessment. Thus, SSM has used alternative stylized reference biosphere models to calculate environmental activity concentrations for use in subsequent exposure calculations. Secondly, an alternative dose model (RESRAD-BIOTA) is used to calculate doses to biota that are compared with SKB's calculations with the ERICA tool. SSM's experience from this review is that existing tools for environmental dose assessment are possible to use in order to show compliance with Swedish legislation. However, care is needed when site representative species are assessed with the aim to contrast them to generic reference organism. The alternative modelling of environmental concentrations resulted in much lower concentrations compared to SKB's results. However, SSM judges that SKB's in this part conservative approach is relevant for a screening assessment. SSM also concludes that there are big differences in dose rates calculated to different organisms depending on which tool that is used, although not systematically higher for either of them. Finally, independent regulatory modelling has proven valuable for SSM's review in gaining understanding and confidence in SKB's assessment presented in the license application.


Subject(s)
Environmental Policy , Licensure , Radioactive Waste/analysis , Conservation of Natural Resources , Forecasting , Radiation Monitoring , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Sweden
4.
J Environ Radioact ; 178-179: 446-452, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28341479

ABSTRACT

Several countries consider geological disposal facilities as the preferred option for spent nuclear fuel due to their potential to provide isolation from the surface environment on very long timescales. In 2011 the Swedish Nuclear Fuel & Waste Management Co. (SKB) submitted a license application for construction of a spent nuclear fuel repository. The disposal method involves disposing spent fuel in copper canisters with a cast iron insert at about 500 m depth in crystalline basement rock, and each canister is surrounded by a buffer of swelling bentonite clay. SKB's license application is supported by a post-closure safety assessment, SR-Site. SR-Site has been reviewed by the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) for five years. The main method for review of SKB's license application is document review, which is carried out by SSM's staff and supported by SSM's external experts. The review has proven a challenging task due to its broad scope, complexity and multidisciplinary nature. SSM and its predecessors have, for several decades, been developing independent models to support regulatory reviews of post-closure safety assessments for geological repositories. For the review of SR-Site, SSM has developed a modelling approach with a structured application of independent modelling activities, including replication modelling, use of alternative conceptual models and bounding calculations, to complement the traditional document review. This paper describes this scheme and its application to biosphere and dose assessment modelling. SSM's independent modelling has provided important insights regarding quality and reasonableness of SKB's rather complex biosphere modelling and has helped quantifying conservatisms and highlighting conceptual uncertainty.


Subject(s)
Models, Chemical , Radiation Dosage , Radioactive Waste/analysis , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Assessment , Sweden , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/methods
5.
In. Cuba. Universidad de Ciencias Médicas. Protección radiológica en la aplicación de las técnicas nucleares. La Habana, ECIMED, 2 ed; 2017. , ilus, tab.
Monography in Spanish | CUMED | ID: cum-70840
6.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 22(6): 1797-1811, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26695505

ABSTRACT

The nuclear community frequently refers to the concept of "future generations" when discussing the management of high-level radioactive waste. However, this notion is generally not defined. In this context, we have to assume a wide definition of the concept of future generations, conceived as people who will live after the contemporary people are dead. This definition embraces thus each generation following ours, without any restriction in time. The aim of this paper is to show that, in the debate about nuclear waste, this broad notion should be further specified and to clarify the related implications for nuclear waste management policies. Therefore, we provide an ethical analysis of different management strategies for high-level waste in the light of two principles, protection of future generations-based on safety and security-and respect for their choice. This analysis shows that high-level waste management options have different ethical impacts across future generations, depending on whether the memory of the waste and its location is lost, or not. We suggest taking this distinction into account by introducing the notions of "close future generations" and "remote future generations", which has important implications on nuclear waste management policies insofar as it stresses that a retrievable disposal has fewer benefits than usually assumed.


Subject(s)
Radioactive Waste/ethics , Social Responsibility , Waste Management/ethics , Waste Management/standards , Radioactive Waste/economics , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence
7.
J Radiol Prot ; 35(3): 571-96, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26160861

ABSTRACT

In compliance with the fundamentals of the government's policy in the field of nuclear and radiation safety approved by the President of the Russian Federation, Russia has developed a national program for decommissioning of its nuclear legacy. Under this program, the State Atomic Energy Corporation 'Rosatom' is carrying out remediation of a Site for Temporary Storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and radioactive waste (RW) at Andreeva Bay located in Northwest Russia. The short term plan includes implementation of the most critical stage of remediation, which involves the recovery of SNF from what have historically been poorly maintained storage facilities. SNF and RW are stored in non-standard conditions in tanks designed in some cases for other purposes. It is planned to transport recovered SNF to PA 'Mayak' in the southern Urals. This article analyses the current state of the radiation safety supervision of workers and the public in terms of the regulatory preparedness to implement effective supervision of radiation safety during radiation-hazardous operations. It presents the results of long-term radiation monitoring, which serve as informative indicators of the effectiveness of the site remediation and describes the evolving radiation situation. The state of radiation protection and health care service support for emergency preparedness is characterized by the need to further study the issues of the regulator-operator interactions to prevent and mitigate consequences of a radiological accident at the facility. Having in mind the continuing intensification of practical management activities related to SNF and RW in the whole of northwest Russia, it is reasonable to coordinate the activities of the supervision bodies within a strategic master plan. Arrangements for this master plan are discussed, including a proposed programme of actions to enhance the regulatory supervision in order to support accelerated mitigation of threats related to the nuclear legacy in the area.


Subject(s)
Nuclear Reactors/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/methods , Government Regulation , Humans , Industrial Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Russia , Safety Management/legislation & jurisprudence
8.
Phys Med ; 31(7): 726-32, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26099431

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We propose to summarize the advancements introduced by the new Directive 2013/59/Euratom concerning the concept of clearance, for which the radioactive medical waste represents a typical candidate. We also intend to spotlight disputable points in the regulatory scheme in force in Italy, as well to make a contribution to evaluate whether the practice of patients' urine storing, stated by it, can be regarded to be proper. METHODS: With directing our interest to radionuclides used in Nuclear Medicine, we first present an overview of how the clearance concept, and that of exemption closely related to it, have been developed from the previous Directive 96/29 to the new one; then we describe the implementation of these concepts in the Italian legislation. Subsequently we estimate the exposure due both to keeping the effluent on site and to direct discharging it to the environment. RESULTS: In line with a well established international consensus, the Directive 2013/59 drives simple and harmonized regulation of clearance. On the contrary, some complexity and lack of consistency can be found in the framework of the national legislation affecting the radioactive medical waste handling. In addition the practice of excreta storing is disputed not to be really beneficial. CONCLUSION: The opportunity should be taken to make the whole system of these requirements simpler and more consistent and effective when it is revised to transpose the new Directive.


Subject(s)
Hospitals , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Fresh Water/chemistry , Half-Life , Sewage/chemistry
9.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 164(1-2): 30-3, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25288821

ABSTRACT

Past development of processes and technologies using radioactive material led to construction of many facilities worldwide. Some of these facilities were built and operated before the regulatory infrastructure was in place to ensure adequate control of radioactive material during operation and decommissioning. In other cases, controls were in place but did not meet modern standards, leading to what is now considered to have been inadequate control. Accidents and other events have occurred resulting in loss of control of radioactive material and unplanned releases to the environment. The legacy from these circumstances is that many countries have areas or facilities at which abnormal radiation conditions exist at levels that give rise to concerns about environmental and human health of potential interest to regulatory authorities. Regulation of these legacy situations is complex. This paper examines the regulatory challenges associated with such legacy management and brings forward suggestions for finding the path from: legacy recognition; implementation, as necessary, of urgent mitigation measures; development of a longer-term management strategy, through to release from regulatory control.


Subject(s)
Government Regulation , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Safety Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Europe , Humans , Internationality , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence
10.
Fed Regist ; 79(227): 70085-90, 2014 Nov 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25423689

ABSTRACT

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is amending its regulations to waive the requirement of registration for persons who are authorized under United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission or Agreement State medical use licenses or permits and administer the drug product DaTscan(TM).


Subject(s)
Drug and Narcotic Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Iodine Radioisotopes , Nortropanes , Controlled Substances , Humans , Licensure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , State Government , United States
11.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 11(10): D147-56, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24856781

ABSTRACT

The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Atomic Power Plant that accompanied the Great East Japan Earthquake on March 11, 2011, released a large amount of radioactive material. To rehabilitate the contaminated areas, the government of Japan decided to carry out decontamination work and manage the waste resulting from decontamination. In the summer of 2013, the Ministry of the Environment planned to begin a full-scale process for waste disposal of contaminated soil and wastes removed as part of the decontamination work. The existing regulations were not developed to address such a large amount of contaminated wastes. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), therefore, had to amend the existing regulations for waste disposal workers. The amendment of the general regulation targeted the areas where the existing exposure situation overlaps the planned exposure situation. The MHLW established the demarcation lines between the two regulations to be applied in each situation. The amendment was also intended to establish provisions for the operation of waste disposal facilities that handle large amounts of contaminated materials. Deliberation concerning the regulation was conducted when the facilities were under design; hence, necessary adjustments should be made as needed during the operation of the facilities.


Subject(s)
Decontamination/standards , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/legislation & jurisprudence , Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Nuclear Power Plants/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioactive Fallout/analysis , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods , Humans , Japan , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/standards , Protective Devices , Radioactive Fallout/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Fallout/prevention & control , Refuse Disposal , Soil Pollutants, Radioactive/standards
12.
J Radiol Prot ; 34(1): 161-81, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24441764

ABSTRACT

A new radioactive substances regulatory regime came into effect across the UK on 1 October 2011, accompanied by Government and regulator's guidance. The legislation sets new activity thresholds for what is within its scope and for what is exempt from the permitting requirements. These thresholds are, for the first time, clearly based on the levels in the Basic Safety Standards Directive; distinguish between NORM industrial activities and practices; and are derived from different dose constraints. There are new exemption provisions for NORM, aqueous liquids and gaseous wastes.


Subject(s)
Radioactive Pollutants , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom
13.
J Environ Radioact ; 131: 110-8, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24268758

ABSTRACT

The Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority has been implementing a regulatory cooperation program in the Russian Federation for over 10 years, as part of the Norwegian government's Plan of Action for enhancing nuclear and radiation safety in northwest Russia. The overall long-term objective has been the enhancement of safety culture and includes a special focus on regulatory supervision of nuclear legacy sites. The initial project outputs included appropriate regulatory threat assessments, to determine the hazardous situations and activities which are most in need of enhanced regulatory supervision. In turn, this has led to the development of new and updated norms and standards, and related regulatory procedures, necessary to address the often abnormal conditions at legacy sites. This paper presents the experience gained within the above program with regard to radio-ecological characterization of Sites of Temporary Storage for spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste at Andreeva Bay and Gremikha in the Kola Peninsula in northwest Russia. Such characterization is necessary to support assessments of the current radiological situation and to support prospective assessments of its evolution. Both types of assessments contribute to regulatory supervision of the sites. Accordingly, they include assessments to support development of regulatory standards and guidance concerning: control of radiation exposures to workers during remediation operations; emergency preparedness and response; planned radionuclide releases to the environment; development of site restoration plans, and waste treatment and disposal. Examples of characterization work are presented which relate to terrestrial and marine environments at Andreeva Bay. The use of this data in assessments is illustrated by means of the visualization and assessment tool (DATAMAP) developed as part of the regulatory cooperation program, specifically to help control radiation exposure in operations and to support regulatory analysis of management options. For assessments of the current radiological situation, the types of data needed include information about the distribution of radionuclides in environmental media. For prognostic assessments, additional data are needed about the landscape features, on-shore and off-shore hydrology, geochemical properties of soils and sediments, and possible continuing source terms from continuing operations and on-site disposal. It is anticipated that shared international experience in legacy site characterization can be useful in the next steps. Although the output has been designed to support regulatory evaluation of these particular sites in northwest Russia, the methods and techniques are considered useful examples for application elsewhere, as well as providing relevant input to the International Atomic Energy Agency's international Working Forum for the Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites.


Subject(s)
Cesium Radioisotopes/analysis , Radioactive Pollutants/analysis , Radioactive Waste , Strontium Radioisotopes/analysis , Waste Management , Government Regulation , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Russia , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence
14.
Gig Sanit ; (3): 15-9, 2013.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24340572

ABSTRACT

Activities related to the rehabilitation of areas and facilities of the temporary storage of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste (SNF and RW) at Andreeva Bay and Gremikha on the Kola Peninsula and in the Primorsky Krai in the Russian Far East is an important component of the regulatory functions of the Federal Medical biological Agency (FMBA of Russia). Technical support to the FMBA of Russia in this activity is provided by A.L Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center Main research interests include evaluation of radiological threats to determine the priority directions of regulation, a detailed analysis of the radiation situation at areas, territories and in vicinity of temporary waste storage facilities, radiation control and environmental monitoring, the development of digital maps and geoinformation systems, project expertise in the field of rehabilitation of PVC including the management of SNF and RW Implementation of these natural, practical and theoretical works is completed by development a set of regulatory documents ensuring adherence to radiation safety for the stuff population and the environment, and the also documents governing the management of SNF and RW waste in the territories of PVC.


Subject(s)
Military Facilities/standards , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioactive Waste , Government Regulation , Military Hygiene , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/analysis , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/prevention & control , Russia
15.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 81: 255-60, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23582494

ABSTRACT

In 2011 the joint research project Metrology for Radioactive Waste Management (MetroRWM)(1) of the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP) started with a total duration of three years. Within this project, new metrological resources for the assessment of radioactive waste, including their calibration with new reference materials traceable to national standards will be developed. This paper gives a review on national, European and international strategies as basis for science-based metrological requirements in clearance and acceptance of radioactive waste.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/prevention & control , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/standards , Decontamination/legislation & jurisprudence , Decontamination/standards , Internationality
16.
Risk Anal ; 33(1): 2-14, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23311528

ABSTRACT

The U.S. government has the obligation of managing the high-level radioactive waste from its defense activities and also, under existing law, from civilian nuclear power generation. This obligation is not being met. The January 2012 Final Report from the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future provides commendable guidance but little that is new. The author, who served on the federal Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board from 1989 to 1994 and subsequently on the Board on Radioactive Waste Management of the National Research Council from 1994 to 1999, provides a perspective both on the Commission's recommendations and a potential path toward progress in meeting the federal obligation. By analogy to Sisyphus of Greek mythology, our nation needs to find a way to roll the rock to the top of the hill and have it stay there, rather than continuing to roll back down again.


Subject(s)
Radioactive Waste/analysis , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/standards , Geologic Sediments , Humans , United States
18.
Med Tr Prom Ekol ; (8): 8-12, 2012.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23088018

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a modification of the basic directions of state accounting and control of radioactive substances and radioactive waste products, whose implementation will significantly improve the efficiency of its operation at the regional level. Selected areas are designed to improve accounting and control system for the submission of the enterprises established by the reporting forms, the quality of the information contained in them, as well as structures of information and process for collecting, analyzing and data processing concerning radioactive substances and waste products.


Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Russia , Waste Management/methods , Waste Management/standards
19.
Ann ICRP ; 41(3-4): 352-67, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23089035

ABSTRACT

A survey programme was initiated several years ago with the aim of estimating the incidence of naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) exposure for workers in the oil and gas industry, gold mining, spas, and a tourist cavern in Argentina. This work presents the procedures, methods employed, and results to date from the survey, including protection and remedial actions recommended when deemed necessary. Radium isotope concentrations measured in some samples were well above the exemption values established by IAEA Standards. Elevated radon levels (above the action level established for workplaces) were detected in the gas facilities, the gold mine, and the tourist cavern. The pertinent authorities and the facilities were informed of the detected values in order to take actions to reduce concentrations. In terms of the spas, almost all values for geothermal waters were below the corresponding guidance levels. Some regulatory aspects for the management of NORM are suggested.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiation Monitoring , Radioactive Waste/analysis , Argentina , Environmental Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Humans , Industry , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Recreation
20.
J Radiol Prot ; 31(3): 309-17, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21865612

ABSTRACT

Over the past 50 years a comprehensive regulatory framework for radioactive substances in the UK has been progressively introduced, important initial milestones being the white paper Cmnd 884 and the Radioactive Substances Act 1960. During the 1970s and 1980s there were a succession of enquiries and white papers which developed from the growing awareness of the problems of the nuclear waste legacy. This was followed by a comprehensive policy white paper in 1995: Cm 2919. In 1990, 1993, 1995 and 2005 some aspects of the 1960 Act were updated. The most recent, and most radical, modernisation took place in 2010, when the Act was incorporated into the Environmental Permitting Regulations, in England and Wales. Currently a major review of the exemption orders and exclusion criteria under the radioactive substances legislation is close to completion, which will complete the current phase of modernisation of the regulatory framework.


Subject(s)
Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...