Fluoroless Ureteroscopy: Experience in More Than 100 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Ureteroscopy is becoming the primary treatment for ureteral stones. As a standard of care, ureteroscopy is performed under the supervision of fluoroscopy. Recent advances in endourological technology make the need for fluoroscopy questionable. OBJECTIVES: To summarize our experience with a no-fluoroscopy technique for selected cases of ureteral stones. METHODS: Patients were considered suitable for fluoroless ureteroscopy if they had one or two non-impacted stones, in any location in the ureter, 5-10 mm size, with a normal contralateral renal unit and no urinary tract infection. Procedures were performed using rigid scopes, nitinol baskets/forceps for stone retrieval, and Holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. Stents were placed per surgeon's decision. RESULTS: During an 18-month period, 103 patients underwent fluoroless ureteroscopy. In 94 patients stones were removed successfully. In six, the stones were pushed to the kidney and treated successfully on a separate session by shock wave lithotripsy. In three patients no stone was found in the ureter. In five patients, miniature perforations in the ureter were noted and an indwelling double J stent was placed. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroless ureteroscopy resulted in a high rate of success. We believe that in selected cases it can be used with minimal adverse events.

Executive Summary: Screening for Lung Cancer: Chest Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose chest CT screening for lung cancer has become a standard of care in the United States, in large part because of the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Additional evidence supporting the net benefit of low-dose chest CT screening for lung cancer, and increased experience in minimizing the potential harms, has accumulated since the prior iteration of these guidelines. Here, we update the evidence base for the benefit, harms, and implementation of low-dose chest CT screening. We use the updated evidence base to provide recommendations where the evidence allows, and statements based on experience and expert consensus where it does not. METHODS: Approved panelists reviewed previously developed key questions using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format to address the benefit and harms of low-dose CT screening, and key areas of program implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on a quarterly basis since the time of the previous guideline publication. Reference lists from relevant retrievals were searched, and additional papers were added. Retrieved references were reviewed for relevance by two panel members. The quality of the evidence was assessed for each critical or important outcome of interest using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analyses were performed where appropriate. Important clinical questions were addressed based on the evidence developed from the systematic literature review. Graded recommendations and ungraded statements were drafted, voted on, and revised until consensus was reached. RESULTS: The systematic literature review identified 75 additional studies that informed the response to the 12 key questions that were developed. Additional clinical questions were addressed resulting in seven graded recommendations and nine ungraded consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that low-dose CT screening for lung cancer can result in a favorable balance of benefit and harms. The selection of screen-eligible individuals, the quality of imaging and image interpretation, the management of screen-detected findings, and the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions can impact this balance.

Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose chest CT screening for lung cancer has become a standard of care in the United States, in large part because of the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Additional evidence supporting the net benefit of low-dose chest CT screening for lung cancer, and increased experience in minimizing the potential harms, has accumulated since the prior iteration of these guidelines. Here, we update the evidence base for the benefit, harms, and implementation of low-dose chest CT screening. We use the updated evidence base to provide recommendations where the evidence allows, and statements based on experience and expert consensus where it does not. METHODS: Approved panelists reviewed previously developed key questions using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format to address the benefit and harms of low-dose CT screening, and key areas of program implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on a quarterly basis since the time of the previous guideline publication. Reference lists from relevant retrievals were searched, and additional papers were added. Retrieved references were reviewed for relevance by two panel members. The quality of the evidence was assessed for each critical or important outcome of interest using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Meta-analyses were performed when enough evidence was available. Important clinical questions were addressed based on the evidence developed from the systematic literature review. Graded recommendations and ungraded statements were drafted, voted on, and revised until consensus was reached. RESULTS: The systematic literature review identified 75 additional studies that informed the response to the 12 key questions that were developed. Additional clinical questions were addressed resulting in seven graded recommendations and nine ungraded consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that low-dose CT screening for lung cancer can result in a favorable balance of benefit and harms. The selection of screen-eligible individuals, the quality of imaging and image interpretation, the management of screen-detected findings, and the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions can impact this balance.

Radiation Reduction Strategies in Pediatric Orthopaedics.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric orthopaedic patients have the potential for significant radiation exposure from the use of imaging studies, such as computed tomography and bone scintigraphy. With the potential for long-term treatment, such as is required for scoliosis or osteogenesis imperfecta, patients are at even greater risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. DISCUSSION: Although an association between radiation and cancer risk is evident, causation is difficult to prove because comorbidities or genetic predispositions may play a role in the higher baseline rates of malignancy later in life. Efforts have been made over the years to reduce exposure using more modern imaging techniques and simple radiation reduction strategies. Educational efforts and clinical practice guidelines are decreasing the rate of computed tomography scan use in pediatrics. Although considerable work is being done on the development of radiation-free imaging modalities, imaging that uses ionizing radiation will, in the near term, be necessary in specific circumstances to provide optimal care to pediatric orthopaedic patients. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the ionizing radiation exposure associated with commonly used tests as well as radiation-reduction strategies is essential for the optimal and safe care of pediatric orthopaedic patients.

The role of computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize current literature evidence on the role of computed tomography (CT) scan in the diagnosis and assessment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent guidelines on the use of CT scans in COVID-19 vary between countries. However, the consensus is that it should not be used as the first line; a notion supported by the WHO. Currently, several investigations are being used including reverse transcription PCR testing, chest radiographs, and ultrasound scans, and CT scans. They are ideally performed later during the disease process as the sensitivity and specificity are highest by that time. Typical COVID-19 features on CT scans vary but include vascular enlargement, ground-glass opacities, and ground glass opacification together with consolidation. SUMMARY: Since COVID-19 was declared as a global pandemic, there was a push towards identifying appropriate diagnostic tests that are both reliable and effective. There is a general agreement that CT scans have a high sensitivity but low specificity in diagnosing COVID-19. However, the quality of available studies is not optimal, so this must always be interpreted with the clinical context in mind. Clinicians must aim to weigh up the practicalities and drawbacks of CT scans when considering their use for a patient. The ease and speed of use of CT scans must be balanced with their high radiation doses, and infection control considerations.

A Standardized Protocol for Cervical Spine Evaluation in Children Reduces Imaging Utilization: A Pilot Study of the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries (CSI) have the potential to cause severe morbidity in children. Multiple imaging studies are used during evaluation of CSIs but come at a cost, both financially and in radiation exposure. To reduce resource utilization and radiation exposure, we implemented the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group (PCSCWG) standardized protocol (SP) for evaluating CSIs in children. METHODS: Children below 18 years old presenting with concern for CSI at a level 1 pediatric trauma center were reviewed before (July 2015 to May 2016) and after (November 2017 to June 2018) protocol implementation. Demographics, injuries, and imaging utilization were extracted. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients cleared with clinical exam, and the proportion undergoing x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance image. The secondary outcome was the estimated difference in imaging charges based on the annual reduction in radiographic studies. RESULTS: During the study 359 children were evaluated for CSIs (248 pre-SP, 111 post-SP). Patients were similar with respect to age, injury severity score, and mechanism of injury. Protocol adherence was 87.4%. The prevalence of CSI was similar in the preprotocol and postprotocol cohorts (2.8% vs. 1.8%, P=0.567). Children treated after protocol implementation were significantly more likely to be cleared by clinical exam (15.3% vs. 43.2%, P<0.001). Significantly fewer children had x-rays (70.2% vs. 55.0%, P=0.005) and computed tomography scans (14.5% vs. 5.4%, P=0.013) in the postprotocol period. There was no difference in the utilization of magnetic resonance image (6.9% vs. 7.2%, P=0.904) or the proportion of children discharged with a cervical collar (10.1% vs. 12.6%, P=0.476). No patients in either group were found to have a previously undiagnosed injury at follow-up. The reduction in radiographic studies translates to an estimated annual reduction in imaging charges of $396,476. CONCLUSIONS: The PCSCWG protocol for evaluating CSIs reduced the number of radiographic studies performed and estimated imaging charges while reliably identifying CSIs.

Diagnostic Imaging and Outcomes for Nonobstetric Surgery During Pregnancy.

A surgical disease occurring during pregnancy can present a diagnostic dilemma due to the desire to make a timely and accurate diagnosis within the constraints of limiting radiation exposure to the fetus. However, required diagnostic imaging should be pursued when indicated and attempts made to minimize the radiation dose by utilizing abdominal shielding and low-dose protocols when feasible. When surgery is indicated due to disease processes, treatment should not be altered or delayed due to pregnancy as the evidence for adverse pregnancy outcomes including early pregnancy loss and preterm delivery are overall of low quality due to substantial confounding by the disease process itself.

A New Simplified Biplanar (0-90°) Fluoroscopic Puncture Technique for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Reducing Fluoroscopy Without Ultrasound. Initial Experience and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To present our simplified biplanar fluoroscopic puncture technique, its reduction in the fluoroscopic screening time as well as outcomes and the initial experience for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 136 patients operated with our simplified 0-90° puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy between 2015 and 2018. All patients were classified by stone complexity with Guy´s nephrolithometric stone score. The stone-free rate was evaluated by nonenhanced computerized tomography, and residual stones were defined as fragments ≥2 mm. Complications were divided according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were operated with our puncture technique; 121 patients were performed in supine and 15 in the prone position. Fifty-one were men, and 85 were women with an overall mean age of 44.36 ± 13.23 years. The overall stone-free rate was 62.5%, and 83.8 % after an ancillary procedure. The mean fluoroscopy screening time was 69.47 ± 7.1 and 6 ± 4.1 seconds for the total surgical procedure and the percutaneous puncture, respectively. Complications were present in 25.7%, and no grade IV and V complications were present. CONCLUSION: Our first case series with the 0-90° simplified fluoroscopic puncture technique shows a similar stone-free rate and safety profile but a low fluoroscopic screening time compared to the most common previously reported fluoroscopic puncture techniques non-focused on low radiation protocols. Further studies are required to evaluate the reproducibility, external validation, and the learning curve of our simplified 0-90° technique.

Behaviour and knowledge skill levels of orthopedic surgeons about radiation safety and fluoroscopy use: A survey analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the behaviour and knowledge skill levels of Turkish orthopedic surgeons about fluoroscopy usage and radiation safety. METHODS: The questionnaire, consisting of nineteen questions, was sent to orthopaedic surgeons and requested by a total of 323 surgeons online. The questions were about personal information, training and behaviours related to radiation and fluoroscopy usage, and the use of protective equipment. RESULTS: A total of 277 individuals completed the questionnaire. The answers of 180 surgeons whose working duration was more than 1 year and also who participated in at least one fluoroscopy requiring operation per week, were analysed. 22 (12%) participants answered that they were trained on fluoroscopy usage. Sixty people (33.3%) reported that they did not use any protective equipment regularly. The most commonly used protection methods were lead aprons 123 (68.3%). Thyroid protectors were used by 92 participants (52.1%). There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing the use of protective equipment according to the academic title. Only 19 (10.6%) of the surgeons noted that they used dosimeter regularly, and 15 (83.3%) of them reported that they controlled their dosimeters. CONCLUSION: In this study, Orthopedic surgeons were found not to be adequately trained about use and risks of fluoroscopy and also not to be equipped about methods for preventing radiation damage.

CT scans to exclude spine fractures in children after negative radiographs may lead to increase in future cancer risk.

INTRODUCTION: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend computed tomography (CT) scanning for children who fulfill the criteria of significant mechanism or focal spinal pathology. Resulting radiation might subsequently increase the risk of cancer. METHODS: Children with spinal CT scans and radiographs from August 2015 to July 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were obtained from the formal radiology reports and case notes. The radiation exposure and risk of cancer were estimated. RESULTS: Thirty-five children had spine CT scans, and 757 spine radiographs were undertaken. Nine (25%) children had their spines scanned as a part of trauma series due to a severe mechanism of injury. Two patients (6%) had abnormalities in their radiographs prior to CT scans, and the rest were obtained to exclude injuries with negative radiographs. The mean radiation dose from CT scan was 20.3 (SD: 11.3) mSV. The relative risk of missing a spine fracture in a child with a normal radiograph was not statistically significant (RR1.14 95% CI 0.3-4.3 and P = 0.8), and the NNT for detecting a spine fracture with a normal radiograph with further CT scan was 56. The mean lifetime additional cancer risk with CT scan in this group was 0.37%. A significant (P < 0.0001) positive correlation between the radiation dose and increased cancer risk was found. CONCLUSION: Children with clinically suspected spinal fracture in the absence of red flag signs/symptoms and negative radiographs might be considered for alternative assessments or investigations to reduce the risk of CT-related radiation hazards.

Chest CT Scan at Radiation Dose of a Posteroanterior and Lateral Chest Radiograph Series: A Proof of Principle in Lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Given the rising utilization of medical imaging and the risks of radiation, there is increased interest in reducing radiation exposure. The objective of this study was to evaluate, as a proof of principle, CT scans performed at radiation doses equivalent to that of a posteroanterior and lateral chest radiograph series in the cystic lung disease lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM). METHODS: From November 2016 to May 2018, 105 consecutive subjects with LAM received chest CT scans at standard and ultra-low radiation doses. Standard and ultra-low-dose images, respectively, were reconstructed with routine iterative and newer model-based iterative reconstruction. LAM severity can be quantified as cyst score (percentage of lung occupied by cysts), an ideal benchmark for validating CT scans performed at a reduced dose compared with a standard dose. Cyst scores were quantified using semi-automated software and evaluated by linear correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Overall, ultra-low-dose CT scans represented a 96% dose reduction, with a median dose equivalent to 1 vs 22 posteroanterior and lateral chest radiograph series (0.14 mSv; 5th-95th percentile, 0.10-0.20 vs standard dose 3.4 mSv; 5th-95th percentile, 1.5-7.4; P < .0001). The mean difference in cyst scores between ultra-low- and standard-dose CT scans was 1.1% ± 2.0%, with a relative difference in cyst score of 11%. Linear correlation coefficient was excellent at 0.97 (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In LAM chest CT scan at substantial radiation reduction to doses equivalent to that of a posteroanterior and lateral chest radiograph series provides cyst score quantification similar to that of standard-dose CT scan. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; Nos.: NCT00001465 and NCT00001532; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

[Experience With Different Single-Stage Selective Arterial Catheterization Procedures During X-Ray Endovascular Interventions to Reduce a Radiation Dose for Patients].

Objective: To evaluate the impact of single-stage selective arterial catheterizations during X-ray endovascular interventions to reduce obtained radiation doses in the treatment of patients. Material and Methods: X-ray endovascular interventions were carried out in the operating room equipped with a flat detector digital angiography system (Axiom Artis dTA, Siemens Medical System). The impact of single-stage selective arterial catheterization procedures was analyzed during endovascular interventions for coronary heart disease and uterine myomas on the time course of changes in the collective effective radiation doses for patients in the period 2013 to 2015. Results: Analysis of the findings showed that single-stage selective coronary angiography using a universal (multipurpose) radial coronary catheter and single-stage X-ray endovascular uterine artery embolization techniques could reduce collective effective doses for patients from 5.86 persons-Sv in 2013 to 1.6 persons-Sv in 2015. Conclusion: Different single-stage selective catheterization procedures used during endovascular interventions into the coronary and uterine arteries can reduce radiation doses for patients.

[Comparison of a Radiation Dose During Standard Digital Radiography, Tomosynthesis, and Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography in an Experimental Study of Pediatric Anthropomorphic Phantom].

Objective: To compare a radiation dose obtained during standard digital radiography, tomosynthesis, and multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). Material and Methods: Life-size full body pediatric anthropomorphic mannequin phantom was examined with a Fujifilm FDR Ac Selerate 200 X-ray diagnostic apparatus and a Toshiba Aquilion Prime 64 computed scanner using the Piranha dosimetry equipment, as well as Gammex planar target, for comparison of the resolution of the apparatus. The effective radiation doses were calculated for different anatomical regions with the formulas specified in the methodical instructions, using the coefficients K and Kd. Results: The tables and graphs comparing the radiation dose when using different radiation diagnostic techniques were presented. The resolution of standard digital radiography versus that of tomosynthesis was analyzed. Fluctuations of the doses obtained were associated with the difference in the volume of irradiated tissue and in the presence of the doses in the irradiated volume of organs with high radiosensitivity. Optimal physical and technical parameters of photography were proposed, which could reduce a dose load on the patient, without significantly losing the quality of films. Conclusion: The effective doses of tomosynthesis were significantly higher than those of standard digital radiography (p < 0.05) while those of (MSCT) were above those of both X-ray and tomosynthesis, and the resolution of the latter was slightly lower.

Radiation Exposure and Contrast Agent Reduction During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Ongoing Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the patient radiation exposure and contrast agent variation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures resulting from technological improvements. METHODS: TAVI procedures from January 2008 to July 2015 were analyzed in three different time periods: 1st period, when the angiography was equipped with an image intensifier technology; 2nd period, starting with the installation of a new angiography system with flat-panel detector (FPD) technology; and 3rd period, starting with the systematic use of preprocedural multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to individualize optimal fluoroscopic projections for the aortic prosthesis implantation. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in contrast volume (198 ± 99 mL vs 139 ± 74 mL; P<.001), kerma area product (211 ± 135 Gy•cm² vs 147 ± 120 Gy•cm²; P<.001) and effective dose (42 ± 27 mSv vs 29 ± 24 mSv; P<.001) between the 1st and 2nd periods, respectively. The reduction continued between the 2nd and 3rd periods for contrast volume (139 ± 74 mL vs 110 ± 61 mL; P<.001), kerma area product (147 ± 120 Gy•cm² vs 111 ± 69 Gy•cm²; P<.001), and effective dose (29 ± 24 mSv vs 22 ± 11 mSv; P<.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the appropriate use of FPD technology and preprocedural MDCT to individualize fluoroscopic implant projections for TAVI temporally reduced the amount of radiation and contrast agent administered over time.

Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (IONSYS(®)) can be Safely used in the Hospital Environment with X-Rays, Computerized Tomography and Radiofrequency Identification Devices.

INTRODUCTION: Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (fentanyl ITS, IONSYS(®)) is a patient-controlled analgesia system used for the management of acute postoperative pain, designed to be utilized in a hospital setting. The objective of the two studies was to determine if fentanyl ITS could be safely used with X-rays, computerized tomography (CT) scans and radiofrequency identification (RFID) devices. METHODS: The ITS system has two components: controller and drug unit; the studies utilized ITS systems without fentanyl, referred to as the ITS Placebo system. The first study evaluated the effect of X-radiation on the operation of an ITS Placebo system. Five ITS Placebo systems were exposed to X-rays (20 and 200 mSv total radiation dose-the 200 mSv radiation dose represents a tenfold higher exposure than in clinical practice) while operating in the Ready Mode and five were exposed while operating in the Dose Mode. The second study evaluated the effect of RFID (worst-case scenario of direct contact with an RFID transmitter) on the operation of an ITS Placebo system. During these tests, observations of the user interface and measurements of output voltage confirmed proper function throughout all operational modes (Ready Mode, Dose Mode, End-of-Use Mode, and End-of-Life Mode). RESULTS: The ITS Placebo system met all specifications and no functional anomalies were observed during and following X-ray exposure at two radiation dose levels or exposure at six different combinations of RFID frequencies and field strengths. CONCLUSION: The performance of the ITS system was unaffected by X-ray exposure levels well beyond those associated with diagnostic X-rays and CT scans, and by exposure to radiofrequency field strengths typically generated by RFID devices. These results provide added confidence to clinicians that the fentanyl ITS system does not need to be removed during diagnostic X-rays and CT scans and can also be utilized in close proximity to RFID devices. FUNDING: The studies and writing of this manuscript were supported financially by The Medicines Company.

[Comparative survey of radiation doses to patients in computed tomography in a federal hospital].

OBJECTIVE: to analyze radiation exposure due to computed tomography (CT) of brain, chest, abdomen and pelvis in a large multi-field federal hospital and feasibility of low-dose CT-examinations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed using data from electronic patient records and PACS from a single multi-field hospital. Data were obtained from 1626 records of patients (794 men, 832 women; age range 17-93) scanned with 3 MDCT during one year. CT-examinations of good quality were selected, volumetric CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP) were collected for each of them. The effective doses (ED) were calculated using the normalized coefficients according to Russian Guidance. RESULTS. Number and structure of CT-examinations for the years 2012-2014 in a multi-field hospital were analyzed. The mean effective dose (M ± m) values with/without contrast medium (respectively), according to anatomical areas were as follows: brain--2.34 ± 0.03/3, 52 ± 0.23, chest--4.83 ± 0.11/11.02 ± 0.82, abdomen-pelvis--9.81 ± 0.40/36.6 ± 1.17, chest-abdomen-pelvis - 12.41 ± 0.79/35.63 ± 1.81 mSv. CONCLUSION. Results of this study give an example of CT dose values and distribution in a multi-field hospital. They are compa- rable with reference levels published of other authors. This expe- rience should be expanded for creation of CT national reference values and for co-operation with international initiatives (EUROSAFE projects).

Reduction of Fluoroscopic Exposure Using a New Fluoroscopy Integrating Technology in a 3D-Mapping System During Pulmonary Vein Isolation With a Circular Multipolar Irrigated Catheter.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). With increasing numbers of PVI procedures, demand arises to reduce the cumulative fluoroscopic radiation exposure for both the physician and the patient. New technologies are emerging to address this issue. Here, we report our first experiences with a new fluoroscopy integrating technology in addition to a current 3D-mapping system. The new fluoroscopy integrating system (FIS) with 3D-mapping was used prospectively in 15 patients with AF. Control PVI cases (n = 37) were collected retrospectively as a complete series. Total procedure time (skin to skin), fluoroscopic time, and dose-area-product (DAP) data were analyzed. All PVI procedures were performed by one experienced physician using a commercially available circular multipolar irrigated ablation catheter. All PVI procedures were successfully undertaken without major complications. Baseline characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences. In the group using the FIS, the fluoroscopic time and DAP were significantly reduced from 571 ± 187 seconds versus 1011 ± 527 seconds (P = 0.0029) and 4342 ± 2073 cGycm(2) versus 6208 ± 3314 cGycm(2) (P = 0.049), respectively. Mean procedure time was not significantly affected and was 114 ± 31 minutes versus 104 ± 24 minutes (P = 0.23) by the FIS.The use of the new FIS with the current 3D-mapping system enables a significant reduction of the total fluoroscopy time and DAP compared to the previous combination of 3D-mapping system plus normal fluoroscopy during PVI utilizing a circular multipolar irrigated ablation catheter. However, the concomitant total procedure time is not affected. Thus, the new system reduces the radiation exposure for both the physicians and patients.

A safety radiation marker in the cardiac catheterization lab.

OBJECTIVE: Nowadays, in order to deal with cardiovascular disease, coronary angiography (CRA) is the best tool and gold standard for diagnosis and assessment. CRA inevitably exposes both patient and operator to radiation. The purpose of this study was to calculate the radiation exposure in association with the radiation absorbed by interventional cardiologists, in order to estimate a safety radiation marker in the catheterization laboratory. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 794 successive patients undergoing CRA and in three interventional cardiologists the following parameters were examined: radioscopy duration, radiation exposure during fluoroscopy, total radiation exposure and the number of stents per procedure. Every interventional cardiologist was exposed to 562,936 µGym2 of total radiation during CRA procedures, to 833,371 µGym2 during elective CRA + percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures and to 328,250 µGym2 during primary CRA + PCI. Hence, the total amount of radiation that every angiographer was exposed to amounted to 1,724,557.5 µGym2 (median values). During the same period, the average radiation that every angiographer absorbed was 15,253 while the average dose of radiation absorbed during one procedure was 0.06 mSv for each operator. Therefore, the ratio between radiation exposure and the radiation finally absorbed by every operator was 113:1 µGym2/mSv. CONCLUSIONS: The present study, indicating the ratio above, offers a safety marker in order to realistically estimate the dose absorbed by interventional cardiologists, suggesting a specified number of permitted procedures and an effective level of radiation use protection tools.