Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Comp Oncol ; 18(4): 607-614, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134560

ABSTRACT

Daily image guidance reduces inter-fractional variation in patient position for intracranial radiation therapy. However, the ability to detect and correct positioning errors is limited below a certain level. Because of these limitations, the accuracy achieved with a positioning system prior to image guidance may affect the error remaining after image guidance (the residual setup error). The objective of this study was to compare the setup accuracy achieved before and after megavoltage (MV) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance between two intracranial positioning systems. Equipment included a four degrees-of-freedom couch capable of 1 mm translational moves. Six dog cadavers were positioned 24 times as for clinical treatment in a head re-positioner (HPS), and the coordinates of five fiducial markers were measured before and after image-guided correction. The values obtained for the HPS were compared with those previously reported for the standard positioning system (SPS) used at this facility. The mean three-dimensional distance vector (3DDV) was lower for the HPS than for the SPS when no image guidance was used (P = .019). The mean 3DDV after MV guidance was lower for the HPS than for the SPS (P = .027), but not different after CBCT guidance (P = .231). The 95th percentiles of the 3DDV after MV and CBCT guidance were 2.1 and 2.9 mm, respectively, for the HPS, and 2.8 and 3.6 mm for the SPS. The setup error after MV guidance was lower for the positioning system that achieved a more accurate patient position before image guidance.


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/veterinary , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/veterinary , Dog Diseases/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/veterinary , Radiotherapy Setup Errors/veterinary , Animals , Brain Diseases/radiotherapy , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Dogs , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
2.
Vet Comp Oncol ; 15(1): 237-246, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26178594

ABSTRACT

Recent technical advancements in radiation therapy have allowed for improved targeting of tumours and sparing nearby normal tissues, while simultaneously decreasing the risk for medical errors by incorporating additional safety checks into electronic medical record keeping systems. The benefits of these new technologies, however, depends on their proper integration and use in the oncology clinic. Despite the advancement of technology for treatment delivery and medical record keeping, misadministration errors have a significant impact on patient care in veterinary oncology. The first part of this manuscript describes a medical incident that occurred at an academic veterinary referral hospital, in a dog receiving a combination of stereotactic radiation therapy and full-course intensity-modulated, image-guided radiation therapy. The second part of the report is a literature review, which explores misadministration errors and novel challenges which arise with the implementation of advancing technologies in veterinary radiation oncology.


Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/radiotherapy , Medical Errors/veterinary , Neoplasms/veterinary , Radiotherapy Setup Errors/veterinary , Animals , Dogs , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Dosage , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiosurgery/veterinary , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/veterinary , Schools, Veterinary , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/veterinary , Veterinary Medicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...