Dose-Dependent Effects of Ranolazine on Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced After Subacute Myocardial Infarction in Rabbits.

Ranolazine has been found to prevent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate its efficacy on VAs induced several days post-MI. For this purpose, 13 anesthetized rabbits underwent coronary artery ligation. Ten of these animals that survived AMI were reanesthetized 3 to 7 days later for electrophysiologic testing. An endocardial monophasic action potential combination catheter was placed in the right ventricle for simultaneous pacing and recording. Monophasic action potential duration, ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and VAs induced by programmed stimulation were assessed. Measurements were performed during control pacing, and following an intravenous infusion of either a low-dose ranolazine (2.4 mg/kg, R1) or a higher dose ranolazine (4.8 mg/kg cumulative dose, R2). During control stimulation, 2 animals developed primary ventricular fibrillation (VF), 6 sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT), and 2 nonsustained VT (nsVT). R1 did not prevent the appearance of VAs in any of the experiments; in contrast, it aggravated nsVT into sVT and complicated sVT termination in 2 of 6 animals. Sustained ventricular tachycardia cycle length and VERP were only slightly decreased after R1 (112 ± 5 vs 110 ± 6 ms and 101 ± 11 vs 98 ± 10 ms, respectively). R2 suppressed inducibility of control nsVT, VF, and sVT in 2 animals. In 4 animals with still inducible sVT, R2 significantly prolonged VT cycle length by 150 ± 23 ms (P < .01), and VERP by 120 ± 7 ms (P < .001) versus control. In conclusion, R2 exerted antiarrhythmic efficacy against subacute-MI VAs, whereas R1 rather aggravated than prevented these arrhythmias. Ventricular effective refractory period prolongation could partially explain the antiarrhythmic action of R2 in this rabbit model.

Digitalis Promotes Ventricular Arrhythmias in Flecainide- and Ranolazine-Pretreated Hearts.

A post hoc analysis of the PALLAS trial suggested life-threatening interactions of digitalis and dronedarone. Thus, there is concern about an interplay between digitalis and other drugs that influence cardiac electrophysiology. We therefore investigated the interaction between digitalis and flecainide or ranolazine. Twenty-five rabbit hearts were Langendorff-perfused and treated with flecainide (2 µM, 12 hearts) or ranolazine (10 µM, 13 hearts). Infusion of flecainide prolonged mean action potential duration [APD90, from 153 ms (interquartile range (IQR): 29.7 ms) to 159 ms (IQR: 24.9 ms, p = 0.04)] and effective refractory period [ERP, 170 ms (IQR: 40 ms) vs. 200 ms (IQR: 32.5 ms, p < 0.01)]. Administration of ranolazine prolonged APD90 [144 ms (IQR: 34.3 ms)) vs. 157 ms (IQR: 31.2 ms, p < 0.01)] and ERP [180 ms (IQR: 40 ms) vs. 200 ms (IQR: 30 ms, p < 0.01)]. Additional infusion of the digitalis glycoside ouabain (0.2 µM) abbreviated APD90 and ERP in both groups (flecainide: APD90: to 128 ms (IQR: 19 ms), ERP: to 170 ms (IQR: 20 ms), p < 0.01 each; ranolazine: APD90: to 141 ms (IQR: 40 ms), ERP: to 160 ms (IQR: 30 ms), p < 0.01 each). Ventricular vulnerability was assessed by a pacing protocol employing premature extra stimuli and burst stimulation. No proarrhythmic effect was observed with flecainide (1 vs. 3 episodes at baseline) or ranolazine (3 vs. 11 episodes at baseline). However, further infusion of ouabain had a proarrhythmic effect for both drugs (flecainide: 15 episodes, p = 0.04; ranolazine: 21 episodes, p = 0.09). Concomitant treatment of the sodium channel blockers flecainide or ranolazine with digitalis seems to be proarrhythmic. Abbreviation of repolarization and refractoriness that can facilitate re-entry was found as underlying mechanism.