A phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of atacicept for treatment of IgA nephropathy.

Atacicept is a first-in-class, dual anti-B-cell Activation Factor-A Proliferation-Inducing Ligand fusion protein in clinical evaluation for treatment of IgA nephropathy. To compare efficacy and safety of atacicept versus placebo in patients with IgAN, this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b clinical trial ORIGIN enrolled 116 individuals with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy. Participants were randomized to atacicept 150, 75, or 25 mg versus placebo once weekly for up to 36 weeks. Primary and key secondary endpoints were changes in urine protein creatinine ratio based on 24-hour urine collection at weeks 24 and 36, respectively, in the combined atacicept 150 mg and 75 mg group versus placebo. The primary endpoint was met at week 24 as the mean urine protein creatinine ratio was reduced from baseline by 31% in the combined atacicept group versus 8% with placebo, resulting in a significant 25% reduction with atacicept versus placebo. At week 36, the key secondary endpoint was met as the mean urine protein creatinine ratio reduced from baseline by 34% in the combined atacicept group versus a 2% increase with placebo, resulting in a significant 35% reduction with atacicept versus placebo. The reduction in proteinuria was accompanied by stabilization in endpoint eGFR with atacicept compared to a decline with placebo at week 36, resulting in significant between-group geometric mean difference of 11%, approximating an absolute difference of 5.7 mL/min/1.73m2. Endpoint galactose deficient IgA1 levels significantly decreased from baseline by 60% versus placebo. The safety profile of atacicept was like placebo. Thus, our results provide evidence to support a pivotal, phase 3 study of atacicept in IgA nephropathy.

Treatment patterns and outcomes among adults with immune thrombocytopenia receiving pharmaceutical second-line therapies: a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among individuals with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) receiving second-line therapies (rituximab, romiplostim, or eltrombopag). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative claims database (January 2013-May 2020) among continuously enrolled patients ≥18 years prescribed second-line ITP therapies. The index date was the date of the first claim of the study medications. Treatment patterns and outcomes were measured during the 12-month follow-up period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare treatment patterns and bleeding risk outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients were included (rituximab, N = 285; romiplostim, N = 212; eltrombopag, N = 198). After IPTW, all baseline covariates were balanced. Compared to eltrombopag, patients in the rituximab cohort were 57% more likely to receive other ITP therapies (systematic corticosteroids or third-line therapies) during the follow-up period (odds ratio [OR] = 1.571, p = .030). There was no significant difference in the odds of receiving a different second-line therapy or experiencing a bleeding-related episode among three groups (p > .050). Patients in the romiplostim cohort were 69% more likely to receive rescue therapy compared to those in the rituximab cohort (OR = 1.688, p = .025). CONCLUSION: Patients with ITP receiving rituximab were more likely to need other ITP therapies but did not experience higher risk of bleeding compared to those receiving eltrombopag or romiplostim. Benefits, risks, cost-effectiveness, and patient preference should all be considered in optimizing second-line therapy for ITP.

[Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-A Novel Therapeutic Approach for Autoimmune Disease].

Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) is involved in recycling of IgG. Recycling begins with IgG-uptake into the cell through pinocytosis. Subsequently, IgG binds to FcRn in acidic vesicles, which results in the recycling of the FcRn-IgG complex to cell surface, and the release of IgG in blood with neutral pH. Whereas IgG unbound to FcRn is not recycled and thus degraded in lysosomes. Therefore, FcRn plays a critical role in maintaining IgG levels in the blood. Recently, FcRn has been considered a therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases caused by IgG autoantibodies, and FcRn inhibitors are developed as therapeutic agents for the diseases. As one example, the administration of an FcRn inhibitor, efgartigimod, reduced IgG and anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody levels in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), and improved Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living score in the phase III trial. In 2022, Efgartigimod Alfa was approved for the treatment of gMG (only when treatment with steroids or non-steroidal immunosuppressive drugs do not lead to sufficient response), regardless of antibody status in Japan. Since FcRn inhibitors have just begun to be used in clinical practice, it is important to accumulate real-world data regarding their efficacy and safety. (Received August 21, 2023; Accepted October 6, 2023; Published February 1, 2024).

The problem of immune thrombocytopenia refractory to both eltrombopag and romiplostim.

Immune thrombocytopenia refractory to multiple thrombopoietin receptor agonists remains a challenging clinical problem. This commentary discusses and contextualizes the recent report on this entity from Moulis and colleagues, and how to move forward with these patients. Commentary on: Moulis et al. Difficult-to-treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults: Prevalence and burden. Results from the CARMEN-France Registry. Br J Haematol 2024;204:1476-1482.

Face validity of the Kids' ITP Tools (KIT) in the era of thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

The Kids' ITP Tools (KIT) is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The aim of this study was to update this previously validated tool to align with changes in clinical practice, specifically, treatment with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). Children aged 1-18 with ITP and/or their families were recruited to participate in interviews to review the KIT. Twenty-six interviews were conducted. Based on interview data from children and families, current guidelines, and expert opinion, five changes were made to the KIT in order to improve its face validity.

Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: Evaluation of romiplostim for treatment of thrombocytopenia at a large academic medical center.

Romiplostim is indicated for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), though is often used off-label for other indications such as chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) and thrombocytopenia post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although romiplostim is FDA approved at a starting dose of 1 mcg/kg, it is often initiated at 2-4 mcg/kg depending on the severity of thrombocytopenia in clinical practice. Given the limited data, but interest in higher doses of romiplostim for indications other than ITP, we aimed to assess our inpatient romiplostim utilization at NYU Langone Health.This was a single-center, retrospective review of 84 adult patients from January 2019 to July 2021. The top three indications were ITP (51, 60.7%), CIT (13, 15.5%), and HSCT (10, 11.9%). The median initial romiplostim dose was 3.8 mcg/kg (range, 0.9-10.8). 51% of patients achieved a platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L by the end of week 1 of therapy. For patients achieving goal platelets by the end of week 1, the median dose of romiplostim was 2.4 mcg/kg (range, 0.9-10.8). There was 1 episode of thrombosis and 1 episode of stroke.We found that higher than FDA-recommended initial doses should be considered to achieve a platelet response. It appears to be safe to initiate romiplostim as higher doses, and to increase doses by greater increments than 1 mcg/kg in order to achieve a platelet response. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in off-label indications and should evaluate clinical outcomes such as bleeding and need for transfusions.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Versus FcRn Inhibition in Autoimmune Disease.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE or PLEX) is used in a broad range of autoimmune diseases, with the goal of removing autoantibodies from the circulation. A newer approach for the selective removal of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies is the use of therapeutic molecules targeting the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). FcRn regulates IgG recycling, and its inhibition results in a marked decrease in circulating autoantibodies of the IgG subtype. The difference between FcRn inhibition and PLEX is often questioned. With anti-FcRn monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and fragments only recently entering this space, limited data are available regarding long-term efficacy and safety. However, the biology of FcRn is well understood, and mounting evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and potential differences among compounds in development is available, allowing us to compare against nonselective plasma protein depletion methods such as PLEX. FcRn inhibitors may have distinct advantages and disadvantages over PLEX in certain scenarios. Use of PLEX is preferred over FcRn inhibition where removal of antibodies other than IgG or when concomitant repletion of missing plasma proteins is needed for therapeutic benefit. Also, FcRn targeting has not yet been studied for use in acute flares or crisis states of IgG-mediated diseases. Compared with PLEX, FcRn inhibition is associated with less invasive access requirements, more specific removal of IgG versus other immunoglobulins without a broad impact on circulating proteins, and any impacts on other therapeutic drug levels are restricted to other mAbs. In addition, the degree of IgG reduction is similar with FcRn inhibitors compared with that afforded by PLEX. Here we describe the scientific literature regarding the use of PLEX and FcRn inhibitors in autoimmune diseases and provide an expert discussion around the potential benefits of these options in varying clinical conditions and scenarios.

Romiplostim use for thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case series from a single center in Qatar.

Thrombocytopenia is a common and serious complication that can occur following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and it contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. The mechanisms of post-HSCT thrombocytopenia are multifactorial and complex. There are no clear consensus and guidelines for managing thrombocytopenia post-HSCT. Recently, there has been promising use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), particularly eltrombopag and romiplostim, as treatments for post-HSCT thrombocytopenia. Notably, that this indication is considered off-label, and data in this use are limited. Based on the existing body of evidence, romiplostim emerges as a safe and effective option for individuals with transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia after HSCT. In this context, we present a summary of our experience at a single center, where romiplostim was used in the management of post-HSCT thrombocytopenia due to poor graft function. Notably, all four cases responded positively to romiplostim treatment, and no significant adverse events were observed.

Efficacy and safety of the neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor efgartigimod in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ADVANCE IV): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disorder mediated partly by platelet autoantibodies, resulting in thrombocytopenia, bleeding, and constitutional symptoms. Efgartigimod, a first-in-class novel human IgG1 Fc fragment, binds the neonatal Fc receptor with high affinity and thus reduces serum IgG concentrations, including autoantibodies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in adults with persistent and chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia. METHODS: This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 24-week study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous efgartigimod in adults aged 18 years or older with chronic or persistent primary immune thrombocytopenia who had an average platelet count of less than 30 000, had responded to at least one previous immune thrombocytopenia therapy, and were on a concurrent therapy at baseline or had received at least a second previous immune thrombocytopenia therapy. The study took place in 71 participating sites from Asia, Europe, and North America. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously for the first 4 weeks, after which the dosing schedule could be altered to once per week or every other week depending on the patients' platelet count. The primary endpoint, evaluated in the chronic population, was sustained platelet count response (≥50 × 109 for at least 4 of the last 6 weeks). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04188379) and is completed. FINDINGS: A total of 205 patients were screened from Dec 9, 2019, to Feb 3, 2022, and 131 (86 in the efgartigimod group; 45 in the placebo group) were randomly assigned. These patients represented a population with long-term disease who had a mean time since diagnosis of 10·6 years and 67% (88/131) of whom had received at least three previous immune thrombocytopenia treatments. 22% (17/78) of patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia receiving efgartigimod reached the primary endpoint compared with 5% (2/40) of those receiving placebo (p=0·032; adjusted difference in response, 16% [95% CI 2·6-26·4]). The median number of weeks of disease control in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia was 2·0 (IQR 0·0-11·0) for efgartigimod versus 0·0 (0·0-1·0) for placebo (p=0·0009). Efgartigimod was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. The most common adverse events of interest in both groups were headache (16% in efgartigimod and 13% in placebo), haematuria (16% in efgartigimod and 16% in placebo), and petechiae (15% in efgartigimod and 27% in placebo). INTERPRETATION: Efgartigimod significantly increased sustained platelet count responses compared with placebo in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, including those who had received multiple previous immune thrombocytopenia therapies. Upon completion of the ADVANCE IV study, patients could enroll in the ongoing open-label extension. Subcutaneous efgartigimod is currently being evaluated in patients with immune thrombocytopenia in the ADVANCE SC+ trial. FUNDING: argenx.

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

The introduction of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) led to a paradigm shift in the management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, TPO-RAs are not approved for use during pregnancy due to the absence of evidence and concerns for possible effects on the fetus due to their expected transplacental transfer. This comprehensive review examines the safety and efficacy of TPO-RA in 45 pregnancies of women with ITP (romiplostim n = 22; eltrombopag n = 21; both in the same pregnancy n = 2). Mothers experienced failure of the median of three treatment lines during pregnancy prior to TPO-RA administration. A platelet response (>30 × 109 /L) was seen in 86.7% of cases (including a complete response >100 × 109 /L in 66.7%) and was similar between eltrombopag and romiplostim (87.0% and 83.3%, p = 0.99). The maternal safety profile was favourable, with no thromboembolic events encountered. Neonatal thrombocytopenia was noted in one third of cases, with one case of ICH grade 3, and neonatal thrombocytosis was observed in three cases. No other neonatal adverse events attributable to TPO-RAs were seen. This review suggests that the use of TPO-RA during pregnancy is associated with a high response rate and appears safe. Nevertheless, TPO-RA should not be routinely used in pregnancy and should be avoided in the first trimester until further evidence is accumulated.

Patient preferences and experiences regarding thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for immune thrombocytopenia in The Netherlands (TRAPeze Netherlands study).

OBJECTIVE: Identify patient experience and preference towards thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the Netherlands. METHODS: The Thrombopoietin-Receptor Agonist Patient experience (TRAPeze) survey used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit patient preferences and a patient burden survey (PBS) to evaluate the clinical and social impact of ITP. TRAPeze collected responses from 6th October to 19th November 2021. RESULTS: Seventy-six respondents completed the DCE: treatment preference appeared to be driven by method of administration (odds ratio [OR] 4.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.88-6.52), frequency of dosing (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.86-2.92) and drug-food interactions (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.54-2.37). Respondents preferred therapies delivered orally over subcutaneous injection (OR 4.22; 95% CI 2.76-6.46), dosed once weekly over once daily (OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.58-3.54) and without food restrictions over with restrictions (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.52-2.38). Sixty-nine respondents completed the DCE and PBS (mean [range] age 53 [19-83] years, 65% female). Seven incomplete PBS responses were excluded from analysis. Respondents were currently, or most recently, receiving eltrombopag (n = 43) or romiplostim (n = 26), of which 30% (n = 21/69) had previously received another TPO-RA. Loss (29%, n = 6/21) and lack (29%, n = 6/21) of response were the most common reasons for switching TPO-RA. Only 28% (n = 18/65) of respondents felt their TPO-RA increased energy levels. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred therapies delivered orally, dosed less frequently and without food restrictions. QoL of ITP patients on TPO-RAs can be improved; the burden analyses presented can inform future efforts towards this.

Combining thrombopoietin receptor agonists with immunosuppressive drugs in adult patients with multirefractory immune thrombocytopenia, an update on the French experience.

Combining drugs could be an effective option for treating multirefractory ITP, that is, patients not responding to rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) and splenectomy. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study including multirefractory ITP patients who received a combination of a TPO-RA and an immunosuppressive drug. We included 39 patients (67% women, median age 59 years [range 21-96]), with a median ITP duration of 57 months [3-393] and a median platelet count at initiation of 10 × 109 /L [1-35]. The combination regimen was given for a median duration of 12 months [1-103] and included eltrombopag (51%) or romiplostim (49%), associated with mycophenolate mofetil (54%), azathioprine (36%), cyclophosphamide (5%), cyclosporin (3%) or everolimus (3%). Overall, 30 patients (77%) achieved at least a response (platelet count ≥30 × 109 /L and at least doubling baseline during at least 3 months), including 24 complete responses (platelet count >100 × 109 /L during at least 3 months) with a median time to response of 30 days [7-270] and a median duration of response of 15 months [4-63]. Severe adverse event related to ITP treatment was observed in 31%. In conclusion, this study confirms that some patients with multirefractory ITP can achieve long lasting response with this combination.

Emerging data on thrombopoietin receptor agonists for management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of cancer treatment, frequently leading to reduced relative dose intensity, and is associated with reduced survival. Given the lack of FDA-approved therapies for CIT, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have received significant attention for treatment and prevention of CIT. AREAS COVERED: This review will summarize the development of prior agents for treatment of CIT, discuss the existing literature investigating the use of TPO-RAs in CIT primarily in patients with solid tumor malignancies, and offer insights on the future direction of TPO-RAs and other therapeutics for CIT. EXPERT OPINION: In alignment with NCCN guidelines, we recommend that patients with CIT participate in a clinical trial for consideration of TPO-RA treatment or consider off-label use of romiplostim when participation in clinical trials is not possible. The literature to date supports the use of TPO-RAs for treatment of persistent CIT. Further data is needed to describe the long-term efficacy, safety, and prescribing practices of TPO-RAs in a diverse patient population with a variety of tumor types and chemotherapy regimens in addition to exploring the underlying biology of CIT.

Prolonged response after TPO-RA discontinuation in primary ITP: results of a prospective multicenter study.

Sustained response off treatment (SROT) after thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) discontinuation has been reported in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This prospective multicenter interventional study enrolled adults with persistent or chronic primary ITP and complete response (CR) on TPO-RAs. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving SROT (platelet count >30 × 109/L and no bleeding) at week 24 (W24) with no other ITP-specific medications. Secondary end points included the proportion of sustained CR off-treatment (SCROT, platelet count >100 × 109/L and no bleeding) and SROT at W52, bleeding events, and pattern of response to a new course of TPO-RAs. We included 48 patients with a median age of 58.5 years; 30 of 48 had chronic ITP at TPO-RA initiation. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 27 of 48 achieved SROT, 15 of 48 achieved SCROT at W24; 25 of 48 achieved SROT, and 14 of 48 achieved SCROT at W52. No severe bleeding episode occurred in patients who relapsed. Among patients rechallenged with TPO-RA, 11 of 12 achieved CR. We found no significant clinical predictors of SROT at W24. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed enrichment of a tumor necrosis factor α signaling via NF-κB signature in CD8+ T cells of patients with no sustained response after TPO-RA discontinuation, which was further confirmed by a significant overexpression of CD69 on CD8+ T cells at baseline in these patients as compared with those achieving SCROT/SROT. Our results strongly support a strategy based on progressive tapering and discontinuation of TPO-RAs for patients with chronic ITP who achieved a stable CR on treatment. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03119974.

Use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in adults with immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and Central European expert consensus.

There are currently three thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) approved in Europe for treating patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): romiplostim (Nplate®), eltrombopag (Revolade®), and avatrombopag (Doptelet®). However, comparative clinical data between these TPO-RAs are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to perform a literature review and seek expert opinion on the relevance and strength of the evidence concerning the use of TPO-RAs in adults with ITP. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Embase within the last 10 years and until June 20, 2022. A total of 478 unique articles were retrieved and reviewed for relevance. The expert consensus panel comprised ITP senior hematologists from eight countries across Central Europe. The modified Delphi method, consisting of two survey rounds, a teleconference and email correspondence, was used to reach consensus. Forty articles met the relevancy criteria and are included as supporting evidence, including five meta-analyses analyzing all three European-licensed TPO-RAs and comprising a total of 31 unique randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Consensus was reached on seven statements for the second-line use of TPO-RAs in the management of adult ITP patients. In addition, the expert panel discussed TPO-RA treatment in chronic ITP patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 and ITP patients in the first-line setting but failed to reach consensus. This work will facilitate informed decision-making for healthcare providers treating adult ITP patients with TPO-RAs. However, further studies are needed on the use of TPO-RAs in the first-line setting and specific patient populations.

Efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim in Indian patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: A multicentric retrospective study.

Context and Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim in Indian patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Settings and Design: Multicentre, retrospective observational study. Methods and Material: Patients with chronic ITP who received biosimilar romiplostim from July 2019 to March 2020 across 3 major hospitals in Guwahati, India, were included. The study outcomes were the platelet response (platelet count > 50 × 109/L), time to first response, number of dose-limiting events, and the median effective dose. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive. Results: Of 32 patients included in this analysis, majority (59.4%) were females. The mean (SD) age was 40.37 (15.79) years, and mean age at ITP diagnosis was 38.53 years. The median number of romiplostim doses were 27.5 (range: 10-42) over a period of 10 months; median romiplostim dose used was 4.2 µg/kg (range: 2.8-5 µg/kg). Platelet response was achieved as early as after one week in 9 (28.12%) patients, which continued to increase to 24 (75%) patients after the second, 30 (93.75%) patients after the third and all 32 (100%) patients after four weeks of romiplostim administration. The median platelet count was 161 × 109/L. Dose reduction was done in a total of 21 patients. Thrombocytosis (46.88%), elevated liver enzymes (15.63%) and myalgia (15.63%) were the most common adverse events. Conclusions: Biosimilar romiplostim was effective in achieving and maintaining platelet response without any new safety concerns in Indian adult patients with chronic ITP. The median effective dose of romiplostim required in our patients was lower as compared with the standard prescribed dose.