A Dynamic, Split-Luciferase-Based Mini-G Protein Sensor to Functionally Characterize Ligands at All Four Histamine Receptor Subtypes.

In drug discovery, assays with proximal readout are of great importance to study target-specific effects of potential drug candidates. In the field of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the determination of GPCR-G protein interactions and G protein activation by means of radiolabeled GTP analogs ([35S]GTPγS, [γ-32P]GTP) has widely been used for this purpose. Since we were repeatedly faced with insufficient quality of radiolabeled nucleotides, there was a requirement to implement a novel proximal functional assay for the routine characterization of putative histamine receptor ligands. We applied the split-NanoLuc to the four histamine receptor subtypes (H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R) and recently engineered minimal G (mini-G) proteins. Using this method, the functional response upon receptor activation was monitored in real-time and the four mini-G sensors were evaluated by investigating selected standard (inverse) agonists and antagonists. All potencies and efficacies of the studied ligands were in concordance with literature data. Further, we demonstrated a significant positive correlation of the signal amplitude and the mini-G protein expression level in the case of the H2R, but not for the H1R or the H3R. The pEC50 values of histamine obtained under different mini-G expression levels were consistent. Moreover, we obtained excellent dynamic ranges (Z' factor) and the signal spans were improved for all receptor subtypes in comparison to the previously performed [35S]GTPγS binding assay.

Histamine receptors mediate contraction of reticular groove smooth muscle of adult goats.

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of histamine and to characterise its receptor subtypes in reticular groove (RG) smooth muscle of adult goats. The studies were done using floor and lip regions of RG. We used tension experiments on smooth muscle of RG isolated from adult goat for functional characterisation of H1 and H2 receptors. Western blotting and immunohistochemistry experiments were conducted for molecular characterisation of these receptors. Histamine evoked concentration-dependent contraction of isolated RG circular and longitudinal smooth muscle preparation. Pyrilamine antagonised the action of histamine. Histamine did not induce any relaxant effect on RG preparations. Additionally, cimetidine did not produce any significant effect on histamine-induced response. Non-selective histaminic receptor antagonist cyproheptadine attenuated the contraction response to histamine in the smooth muscle. Molecular characterisation and localisation of H1 and H2 receptor proteins confirmed the presence of these receptors in RG. It is most likely that histamine-induced contractile effect in RG smooth muscle of goats is mediated by H1 histaminic receptors.

Histamine receptor expression in human renal tubules: a comparative pharmacological evaluation.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: The aim of this study is to evaluate the expression of the histamine receptors, particularly focusing on the H4R in human renal tubules. MATERIAL: The ex vivo evaluation was carried on specimens from human renal cortex. Primary and immortalized tubular epithelial cells (TECs) and the HK-2 cell line were used as in vitro models. TREATMENT: Cells were pretreated for 10 min with chlorpheniramine maleate 10 µM (H1R antagonist), ranitidine 10 µM (H2R antagonist), GSK189254 1 µM (H3R antagonist) or JNJ7777120 10 µM (H4R antagonist), and then exposed to histamine (3 pM-10 nM) for 30 min. METHODS: The ex vivo evaluation on specimens from human renal cortex was performed by immunohistochemistry. The expression of histamine receptors on primary and immortalized TECs and the HK-2 cell line was evaluated at both gene (RT-PCR) and protein (immunocytofluorescence) levels. The pharmacological analysis was performed by TR-FRET measurements of second messenger (IP3 and cAMP) production induced by histamine with or without the selective antagonists. RESULTS: Our data revealed the presence of all histamine receptors in human tubules; however, only TECs expressed all the receptors. Indeed, histamine elicited a sigmoid dose-response curve for IP3 production, shifted to the right by chlorpheniramine maleate, and elicited a double bell-shaped curve for cAMP production, partially suppressed by the selective H2R, H3R and H4R antagonists when each added alone, and completely ablated when combined together. CONCLUSIONS: Herein, we report the identification of all four histamine receptors in human renal tubules.

Antihistamine use in children.

This review provides an overview of the use of antihistamines in children. We discuss types of histamine receptors and their mechanism of action, absorption, onset and duration of action of first-generation and second-generation H(1)-antihistamines, as well as elimination of H(1)-antihistamines which has important implications for dosing in children. The rationale for the use of H(1)-antihistamines is explored for the relief of histamine-mediated symptoms in a variety of allergic conditions including: non-anaphylactic allergic reactions, atopic eczema (AE), allergic rhinitis (AR) and conjunctivitis, chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and whether they have a role in the management of intermittent and chronic cough, anaphylaxis, food protein-induced gastrointestinal allergy and asthma prevention. Second-generation H(1)-antihistamines are preferable to first-generation H(1)-antihistamines in the management of non-anaphylactic allergic reactions, AR, AE and CSU due to: their better safety profile, including minimal cognitive and antimuscarinic side effects and a longer duration of action. We offer some guidance as to the choices of H(1)-antihistamines available currently and their use in specific clinical settings. H(1)-antihistamine class, availability, licensing, age and dosing administration, recommended indications in allergic conditions and modalities of delivery for the 12 more commonly used H(1)-antihistamines in children are also tabulated.

Species-dependent activities of G-protein-coupled receptor ligands: lessons from histamine receptor orthologs.

Histamine is a biogenic amine that exerts its biological effects as a neurotransmitter and local mediator via four histamine receptor (HR) subtypes (H(x)Rs) - H(1)R, H(2)R, H(3)R, and H(4)R - belonging to the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). All four H(x)Rs exhibit pronounced differences in agonist and/or antagonist pharmacology among various species orthologs. The species differences constitute a problem for animal experiments and drug development. This problem applies to GPCRs with diverse ligands. Here, we summarize our current knowledge on H(x)R orthologs as a case study for species-dependent activity of GPCR ligands. We show that species-specific pharmacology also provides unique opportunities to study important aspects of GPCR pharmacology in general, including ligand-binding sites, the roles of extracellular domains in ligand binding and receptor activation, agonist-independent (constitutive) receptor activity, thermodynamics of ligand/receptor interaction, receptor-activation mechanisms, and ligand-specific receptor conformations.

Molecular and cellular analysis of human histamine receptor subtypes.

The human histamine receptors hH(1)R and hH(2)R constitute important drug targets, and hH(3)R and hH(4)R have substantial potential in this area. Considering the species-specificity of pharmacology of H(x)R orthologs, it is important to analyze hH(x)Rs. Here, we summarize current knowledge of hH(x)Rs endogenously expressed in human cells and hH(x)Rs recombinantly expressed in mammalian and insect cells. We present the advantages and disadvantages of the various systems. We also discuss problems associated with the use of hH(x)R antibodies, an issue of general relevance for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). There is much greater overlap in activity of 'selective' ligands for other hH(x)Rs than the cognate receptor subtype than generally appreciated. Studies with native and recombinant systems support the concept of ligand-specific receptor conformations, encompassing agonists and antagonists. It is emerging that for characterization of hH(x)R ligands, one cannot rely on a single test system and a single parameter. Rather, multiple systems and parameters have to be studied. Although such studies are time-consuming and expensive, ultimately, they will increase drug safety and efficacy.

Histamine in brain development.

The function of histamine in the adult central nervous system has been extensively studied, but data on its actions upon the developing nervous system are still scarce. Herein, we review the available information regarding the possible role for histamine in brain development. Some relevant findings are the existence of a transient histaminergic neuronal system during brain development, which includes serotonergic neurons in the midbrain and the rhombencephalon that coexpress histamine; the high levels of histamine found in several areas of the embryo nervous system at the neurogenic stage; the presence of histaminergic fibers and the expression of histamine receptors in various areas of the developing brain; and the neurogenic and proliferative effects on neural stem cells following histamine H(1) - and H(2) -receptor activation, respectively. Altogether, the reviewed information supports a significant role for histamine in brain development and the need for further research in this field.

Histamine receptor subtypes: a century of rational drug design.

Histamine plays an important role as neurotransmitter and chemical mediator in multiple physiological and pathophysiological processes in central and peripheral tissues. In the last century the extensive study of its actions in the human body, resulted in the identification of four G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes (H1R-H4R), mediating numerous effects. The successful application of H1R and H2R antagonists/inverse agonists in the treatment of allergic conditions and gastric ulcer proved that these two receptors are excellent drug targets. Ligands for H3R are currently in advanced stages of clinical development for a broad spectrum of mainly central diseases (e.g. narcolepsy, Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy and schizophrenia). Meanwhile, preclinical research in the H4R field, focused on inflammatory and immunological processes, led to the evaluation of the first H4R-targeting clinical candidates. Drug development for each histamine receptor subtype will be discussed with a special focus on H3R and H4R ligands.

Histamine and histamine receptors in pathogenesis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease associated with chronic inflammatory demyelination of the central nervous system (CNS). Due to disease complexity and heterogeneity, its pathogenesis remains unknown and despite extensive studies, specific effective treatments have not yet been developed. The factors behind the initiation of the inflammatory reactions in CNS have not been identified until now. MS is considered as a complex disease depending on genetic as well as environmental factors. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is the preferential experimental rodent model for MS. Histamine [2-(4-imidazole) ethylamine] is a ubiquitous inflammatory mediator of diverse physiological processes including neurotransmission, secretion of pituitary hormones, and regulation of the gastrointestinal and circulatory systems which can modulate immune responses. Histamine functions are mediated through four G-protein coupled receptors that are named H1-H4 receptor. Histamine is implicated as an important factor in pathophysiology of MS and EAE. It has been shown that histamine can change the permeability of blood brain barrier, which leads to elevation of infiltrated cells in CNS and neuroinflammation. In contrast, there are evidence that show the protective role of histamine in MS and its animal model, EAE. In this review, we try to clarify the role of histamine in pathogenesis of MS, as well as we evaluate the efficacy of histamine receptors agonists and antagonists in treatment of this disease.

Bayesian mixture modeling using a hybrid sampler with application to protein subfamily identification.

Predicting protein function is essential to advancing our knowledge of biological processes. This article is focused on discovering the functional diversification within a protein family. A Bayesian mixture approach is proposed to model a protein family as a mixture of profile hidden Markov models. For a given mixture size, a hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler comprising both Gibbs sampling steps and hierarchical clustering-based split/merge proposals is used to obtain posterior inference. Inference for mixture size concentrates on comparing the integrated likelihoods. The choice of priors is critical with respect to the performance of the procedure. Through simulation studies, we show that 2 priors that are based on independent data sets allow correct identification of the mixture size, both when the data are homogeneous and when the data are generated from a mixture. We illustrate our method using 2 sets of real protein sequences.

Presynaptic regulation of isolated neonatal rat carotid body type I cells by histamine.

The type I cells are the chemoreceptive elements of the carotid bodies and are critical in defining the ventilatory response to hypoxia and hypercapnia. Recent evidence has suggested that histamine is released by the carotid body in response to hypoxia and acts as an excitatory neurotransmitter. Here we use isolated neonatal rat type I cells to assess the presynaptic actions of histamine and define the receptor subtypes that mediate them. All four histamine receptor subtypes are expressed on the type I cells, however activation of these receptors with histamine or selective agonists caused no rise in intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) and histamine did not augment calcium entry or modulate macroscopic currents evoked in type I cells. Thus activation of histamine receptors on type I cells is unlikely to provide a presynaptic positive feedback mechanism during chemotransduction and any excitatory role attributed to the actions of histamine is likely to come from a postsynaptic effect on the carotid sinus nerve (CSN).

The histamine H receptor as a new target for treatment of canine inflammatory skin diseases.

Histamine is a well known mediator of allergic skin diseases and, with the discovery of the histamine H(4) receptor, the role of histamine is re-evaluated. There are only limited published data elucidating the role of the histamine H(4) receptor in dogs. Twelve beagles intradermally injected with histamine (0.25 micromol and 2.5 micromol/site) reacted with a classical wheal and flare reaction. None of the dogs showed signs of pruritus. The dogs reacted with a wheal and flare reaction after intradermal injection of histamine H(4) receptor agonist/H(3) receptor antagonist clobenpropit (0.1 micromol) and selective histamine H(4) receptor agonist VUF 8430 (1.5 micromol). Again, no scratching occurred in any of the dogs. The highly selective histamine H(4) receptor antagonist JNJ 7777120 reduced the histamine-induced wheal reaction in nine out of 12 dogs. To determine whether canine mast cells are susceptible to histamine H(4) receptor-mediated reactions, effects of clobenpropit and VUF 8430 were tested in canine mastocytoma cells (C2). Incubation with histamine H(4) receptor agonists (up to 10 micromol/L) induced a distinct calcium(2+) influx. C2 cells also responded with enhanced chemotaxis when stimulated with histamine, VUF 8430 and clobenpropit. Neither VUF 8430, nor clobenpropit (up to 10 micromol/L) led to a modulation of histamine concentration in supernatants of canine mastocytoma cells, whereas mastoparan, used as a positive control, enhanced histamine concentration in supernatants. For treatment of allergic skin diseases in dogs, a combination of H(1)R and H(4)R antagonists might be advantageous.

Histamine receptors in human detrusor smooth muscle cells: physiological properties and immunohistochemical representation of subtypes.

The potent inflammatory mediator histamine is released from activated mast cells in interstitial cystitis (IC). Here, we report on the histamine receptor subtypes involved in the intracellular calcium response of cultured smooth muscle cells (cSMC). Fura-2 was used to monitor the calcium response in cSMC, cultured from human detrusor biopsies. The distribution of histamine receptor subtypes was addressed by immunocytochemistry in situ and in vitro. Histamine stimulated a maximum of 92% of the cells (n=335), being more effective than carbachol (70%, n=920). HTMT (H1R-agonist), dimaprit (H2R) and MTH (H3R) lead to significant lower numbers of reacting cells (60, 48 and 54%). Histamine receptor immunoreactivity (H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R) was found in situ and in vitro. Histamine-induced calcium increase is mediated by distinct histamine receptors. Thus, pre-therapeutic evaluation of histamine receptor expression in IC patients may help to optimize therapy by using a patient-specific cocktail of subtype-specific histamine receptor antagonists.

Histamine excites noradrenergic neurons in locus coeruleus in rats.

Histamine is implicated in the control of many brain functions, in particular the control of arousal. Histaminergic neurons send dense projections through the entire brain, including the locus coeruleus (LC)--the main noradrenergic (NAergic) nucleus. In this study, we have examined the effect of bath-applied histamine on cells in the LC by single-unit recordings in slices and the expression of histamine receptors in this area by single-cell RT-PCR. Histamine (10 microM) increased the firing of NAergic cells to 130+/-9% of control, 100 microM to 256+/-58% of control. This excitation was unaffected by blocking synaptic transmission. Histamine-mediated excitation was blocked by an H1 receptor antagonist, mepyramine, in 78% of cells and by cimetidine, an H2 receptor antagonist, in 42% of cells, but not by the H3 receptor antagonist, thioperamide. RT-PCR revealed that mRNA for the H1 receptor was expressed in 77% of isolated LC neurons, mRNA for the H2 receptor in 41% of LC neurons and H3 receptors in 29%. These findings underline the coordination between aminergic systems and suggest that the arousal induced by the histamine system could involve excitation of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus.

Histamine receptors that influence blockage of the normal human nasal airway.

1. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms by which histamine causes nasal blockage. Histamine, 40-800 microg, intranasally into each nostril, induced significant blockage of the nasal airway in normal human subjects, as measured by acoustic rhinometry. 2. Oral pretreatment with cetirizine, 5-30 mg, the H1 antagonist, failed to reverse completely the nasal blockage induced by histamine, 400 microg. 3. Dimaprit, 50-200 microg, the H2 agonist, intranasally, caused nasal blockage, which was reversed by oral pretreatment with ranitidine, 75 mg, the H2 antagonist. 4. A combination of cetirizine, 20 mg, and ranitidine, 75 mg, caused greater inhibition of the nasal blockage caused by histamine, 400 microg, than cetirizine alone. In the presence of both antagonists, there was residual histamine-induced nasal blockage. 5. R-alpha-methylhistamine (R-alpha-MeH), 100-600 microg, the H3 agonist, intranasally, caused nasal blockage, which was not inhibited by either cetirizine or ranitidine. 6. Thioperamide, 700 microg, the H3 antagonist, intranasally, reversed the R-alpha-MeH-induced nasal blockage. Thioperamide alone had no significant action on the nasal blockage induced by histamine, 400 and 1000 microg, but, in the presence of cetirizine, 20 mg, thioperamide further reduced the histamine-induced nasal blockage. 7. Corynanthine, 2 mg, the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, administered intranasally, caused nasal blockage. 8. Corynanthine produced a greater increase in nasal blockage when in combination with bradykinin compared to its combination with R-alpha-MeH. 9. There appears to be a contribution of H1, H2 and H3 receptors to histamine-induced nasal blockage in normal human subjects. The sympathetic nervous system actively maintains nasal patency and we suggest that activation of nasal H3 receptors may downregulate sympathetic activity.

Immunohistochemical localization of histamine receptor subtypes in human inferior turbinates.

Histamine is an important chemical mediator in allergic rhinitis and plays an important role in eliciting the nasal symptoms of the disorder. However, the immunohistochemical localization of histamine receptor subtypes (H1R, H2R, H3R, and H4R) in human nasal mucosa is unknown. There are also no prior studies of H3R and H4R in human nasal mucosa. The objective of this study was to examine the distribution of histamine receptor subtypes in the human inferior turbinates by an immunohistochemical method. H1R was localized primarily in the epithelium, vessels, and nerves. H2R was localized primarily in the epithelium and the glands. H3R and H4R were clearly distributed on the nerves. In addition, H1R, H3R, and H4R were clearly localized on the same nerves. This result indicates that H1R, H3R, and H4R adjoin and regulate each other in the same nerves. All histamine receptor subtypes may play some role in patients with allergic rhinitis.

G-protein coupled receptors: SAR analyses of neurotransmitters and antagonists.

BACKGROUND: From the deductive point of view, neurotransmitter receptors can be divided into categories such as cholinergic (muscarinic, nicotinic), adrenergic (alpha- and beta-), dopaminergic, serotoninergic (5-HT1 approximately 5-HT5), and histaminergic (H1 and H2). Selective agonists and antagonists of each receptor subtype can have specific useful therapeutic applications. For understanding the molecular mechanisms of action, an inductive method of analysis is useful. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to examine the structure-activity relationships of agents acting on G-protein coupled receptors. METHOD: Representative sets of G-PCR agonists and antagonists were identified from the literature and Medline [P.M. Walsh (2003) Physicians' Desk Reference; M.J. O'Neil (2001) The Merck Index]. The molecular weight (MW), calculated logarithm of octanol/water partition coefficient (C log P) and molar refraction (CMR), dipole moment (DM), E(lumo) (the energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, a measure of the electron affinity of a molecule and its reactivity as an electrophile), E(homo) (the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital, related to the ionization potential of a molecule, and its reactivity as a nucleophile), and the total number of hydrogen bonds (H(b)) (donors and receptors), were chosen as molecular descriptors for SAR analyses. RESULTS: The data suggest that not only do neurotransmitters share common structural features but their receptors belong to the same ensemble of G-protein coupled receptor with seven to eight transmembrane domains with their resultant dipoles in an antiparallel configuration. Moreover, the analysis indicates that the receptor exists in a dynamic equilibrium between the closed state and the open state. The energy needed to open the closed state is provided by the hydrolysis of GTP. A composite 3-D parameter frame setting of all the neurotransmitter agonists and antagonists are presented using MW, Hb and mu as independent variables. CONCLUSION: It appears that all neurotransmitters examined in this study operate by a similar mechanism with the G-protein coupled receptors.

Affinity of cyamemazine, an anxiolytic antipsychotic drug, for human recombinant dopamine vs. serotonin receptor subtypes.

Animal studies indicate that the anxiolytic properties of the antipsychotic agent cyamemazine may result from blockade of serotonin 5-HT(2C) receptors and to a lesser extent from blockade of serotonin 5-HT(3) receptors. Here, we used human recombinant receptors to determine the relative affinity of cyamemazine for serotonin and dopamine receptor subtypes. In addition, cyamemazine was tested in other brain receptor types and subtypes which are considered to mediate central nervous systems effects of drugs. Hence, cyamemazine affinity was determined in human recombinant receptors expressed in CHO cells (hD(2), hD(3), and hD(4.4) receptors, h5-HT(1A), h5-HT(2A), h5-HT(2C), and h5-HT(7), and hM(1), hM(2), hM(3), hM(4), and hM(5) receptors), L-cells (hD(1) receptor), and HEK-293 cells (h5-HT(3) receptors) or natively present in N1E-115 cells (5-HT(3) receptors) or in rat cerebral cortex (non-specific alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors, H(3) histamine receptors), and guinea-pig cerebellum (H(1) central and H(2) histamine receptors) membranes. Similarly to atypical antipsychotics, cyamemazine exhibited high affinity for: (i) h5-HT(2A) receptors (K(i)=1.5+/-0.7 nM, mean+/-SEM, N=3) and this was four times higher than for hD(2) receptors (K(i)=5.8+/-0.8 nM), (ii) h5-HT(2C) receptors (K(i)=11.8+/-2.2nM), and (iii) 5-HT(7) receptors (K(i)=22 nM). Conversely, cyamemazine exhibited very low affinity for h5-HT(3) receptors (K(i)=2.9+/-0.4 microM). In conclusion, similarly to atypical antipsychotic agents, cyamemazine, possesses high affinity for h5-HT(2A), h5-HT(2C), and h5-HT(7) receptors, a feature which can explain its low propensity to cause extrapyramidal adverse reactions in clinical practice. The high affinity for h5-HT(2C) receptors, but not for h5-HT(3) receptors, can account for the anxiolytic activity of cyamemazine in human subjects.

Functional analysis of histamine receptor subtypes involved in endothelium-mediated relaxation of the human uterine artery.

1. This work was designed to introduce human uterine arteries as a new model for cardiovascular research. Advantages of this model include considerable availability of tissue because of the appearance of uterus myomatosus in post-menopausal women who undergo surgery and the chance to work on dysfunctional and healthy vessels. 2. Histamine evoked relaxation of the uterine artery that was prevented by removal of the endothelium or by the presence of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine. 3. Receptor antagonists for histamine H(1) (mepyramine) and H(2) (ranitidine) receptors increased the EC(50) of histamine by 112- and 67-fold, respectively. 4. Remarkably, isolated uterine arteries could be stored in incubators for 5 days without any change in contractility to phenylephrine and endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine and histamine. 5. Endothelial cells could be isolated and cultured in high purity, as demonstrated by histochemical staining of factor VIII, low CD45-RO for macrophages and no smooth muscle alpha-actin. In addition, cultured human uterine artery endothelial cells could be used for single cell Ca(2+) measurements. 6. In agreement with our findings in the intact vessel, histamine-initiated elevation of the intracellular free Ca(2+) concentration was reduced in the presence of mepyramine and ranitidine by 59 and 55%, respectively. 7. These data indicate that, in the human uterine artery, H(1) and H(2) receptors are involved in histamine-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation that is mediated by nitric oxide. 8. In addition, this vessel can be stored for possible virus-mediated gene expression for 5 days without any loss of reagibility. 9. Finally, endothelial cells can be isolated and cultured from the human uterine artery and maintain their reactivity to histamine in culture.