Functional Outcome and Sexual-Related Quality of Life After Transperineal Versus Transvaginal Repair of Anterior Rectocele: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Methods of treatment of rectocele include transperineal, transvaginal, and transanal approaches and ventral rectopexy. OBJECTIVE: The present randomized study aimed to compare the outcome of transperineal repair and transvaginal repair of anterior rectocele. DESIGN: This is a randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: This study was conducted at the Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult female patients with anterior rectocele reporting obstructed defecation syndrome were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Anterior rectocele was surgically treated via a transperineal or transvaginal approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in constipation, operation time, hospital stay, complications, changes in anal pressures, and improvement in sexual-related quality of life was assessed by use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, and the incidence of dyspareunia postoperatively was assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-four female patients of a mean age of 43.5 years were entered into the trial. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the operation time. Patients undergoing transperineal repair had significantly longer hospital stays than those undergoing transvaginal repair (2.4 vs 2.1 days, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding postoperative complications and recurrence of rectocele. Significant decrease in the constipation scores was recorded in both groups at 6 and 12 months after surgery. The decrease in the constipation scores after transvaginal repair was significantly higher than after transperineal repair at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Although resting and squeeze anal pressures were significantly increased at 12 months after transperineal repair, they did not show significant change after transvaginal repair. Improvement in sexual-related quality of life was significantly higher in the transvaginal repair group than in the transperineal repair group at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Dyspareunia improved after transvaginal repair and worsened after transperineal repair, yet this change was insignificant. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study comprising a relatively small number of patients. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal repair of rectocele achieved better improvement in constipation and sexual-related quality of life than transperineal repair. Changes in dyspareunia after both techniques were not significant. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B148. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03801291. RESULTADO FUNCIONAL Y CALIDAD DE VIDA RELACIONADA CON EL SEXO DESPUÉS DE LA REPARACIÓN TRANSPERINEAL VERSUS TRANSVAGINAL DEL RECTOCELE ANTERIOR: UN ENSAYO CLÍNICO ALEATORIZADO: Los métodos de tratamiento del rectocele incluyen los abordajes transperineal, transvaginal y transanal y la rectopexia ventral.El objetivo del presente estudio aleatorizado fue comparar el resultado de la reparación transperineal y la reparación transvaginal del rectocele anterior.Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, simple ciego.Unidad de Cirugía Colorrectal, Hospital Universitario de Mansoura.Pacientes mujeres adultas con rectocele anterior que se quejan de síndrome de defecación obstruida.Tratamiento quirúrgico del rectocele anterior mediante abordaje transperineal o transvaginal.Mejora en el estreñimiento, tiempo de operación, estancia hospitalaria, complicaciones, cambios en la presión anal, mejoría en la calidad de vida relacionada con el sexo evaluada por el cuestionario PISQ-12 e incidencia de dispareunia postoperatoria.Sesenta y cuatro pacientes de sexo femenino de una edad media de 43.5 años ingresaron al ensayo. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos con respecto al tiempo de operación. La reparación transperineal tuvo una estancia hospitalaria significativamente más prolongada que la reparación transvaginal (2.4 Vs 2.1 días, p = 0.03). No hubo diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos con respecto a las complicaciones postoperatorias y la recurrencia del rectocele. Se registró una disminución significativa en las puntuaciones de estreñimiento en ambos grupos a los 6 y 12 meses después de la cirugía. La disminución en las puntuaciones de estreñimiento después de la reparación transvaginal fue significativamente mayor que después de la reparación transperineal a los 6 y 12 meses después de la operación. Aunque las presiones anales de reposo y compresión aumentaron significativamente a los 12 meses después de la reparación transperineal, no mostraron cambios significativos después de la reparación transvaginal. La mejora en la calidad de vida relacionada con el sexo fue significativamente mayor en la reparación transvaginal que en el grupo de reparación transperineal a los 6 y 12 meses después de la cirugía. La dispareunia mejoró después de la reparación transvaginal y empeoró después de la reparación transperineal, sin embargo, este cambio fue insignificante.Estudio de un solo centro que comprende un número relativamente pequeño de pacientes.La reparación transvaginal del rectocele logró una mejoría en el estreñimiento y la calidad de vida relacionada con el sexo que la reparación transperineal. Los cambios en la dispareunia después de ambas técnicas no fueron significativos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B148.Ensayos clínicos. Identificador del gobierno: NCT03801291.

Descent and hypermobility of the rectum in women with obstructed defecation symptoms.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstructed defecation symptoms (ODS) are common in women; however, the key underlying anatomic factors remain poorly understood. We investigated rectal mobility and support defects in women with and without ODS using pelvic floor ultrasound and MR defecography. METHODS: This prospective case-control study categorized subjects based on questions 7, 8 and 14 on the PFDI-20, which asks about obstructed defecation symptoms. All subjects underwent an interview, examination and pelvic floor ultrasound, and a subset of 16 subjects underwent MR defecography. The cul de sac-to-anorectal junction distance at rest and during maximum strain was measured on ultrasound and MRI images. The 'compression ratio' was calculated by dividing the change in rectovaginal septum length by its rest length to quantify rectal folding and hypermobility during dynamic imaging and to correlate with ODS. RESULTS: Sixty-two women were recruited, 32 cases and 30 controls. There were no statistically significant differences in age, parity, BMI or stage of rectocele between groups. A threshold analysis indicated the risk of ODS was 32 times greater (OR 32.5, 95% CI 4.8-217.1, p = 0.0003) among women with a high compression ratio (≥ 14) compared with those with a low compression ratio (< 14) after controlling for age, BMI, parity, stool type and BM frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Female ODS are associated with distinct alterations in rectal mobility and support that can be clearly observed on dynamic ultrasound. The defects in rectal support were quantifiable using a compression ratio metric, and these defects strongly predicted the likelihood of symptoms; interestingly, the presence or degree of rectocele defects played no role. These findings may provide new insight into the anatomic factors underlying female ODS.

Motion of the vaginal apex during strain and defecation.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Although the main function of the suspensory ligaments of the vaginal apex is to prevent its descent toward the vaginal introitus, there remains limited information regarding its normal physiological motion. This study was aimed at quantifying the motion of the non-prolapsed vaginal apex during strain and defecation maneuvers. METHODS: This study represents a sub-analysis of a parent study that was aimed at evaluating rectal mobility with regard to obstructed defecation symptoms. Patients with normal apical vaginal support who had undergone MR defecography were entered into the study. For each patient, midsagittal images at rest, maximum strain, and maximum evacuation were utilized. The location of the cervicovaginal junction, S4-S5 intervertebral disc, sacral promontory, and hymen were identified. Vectors were calculated from each of these landmarks to the vaginal apex to compare vector angles and magnitudes across subjects. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included in this study. At rest, the vagina extends from the hymen, which is inferior and posterior to the inferior symphysis pubis, to the vaginal apex at an angle of 45.2° ± 14.5° relative to the pubococcygeal line. This angle became more acute with strain and even more so during maximum evacuation (14.1° ± 9.0°, p < 0.001). Differences in the vector magnitude, although not statistically significant, showed a trend indicating shorter lengths with maximum evacuation. CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal apex is a highly mobile structure demonstrating significantly more mobility during defecation compared with strain. The data obtained contradict the general perception that the vaginal apex is relatively fixed within the pelvis of normally supported women.

Transanal repair of rectocele: prospective assessment of functional outcome and quality of life.

AIM: This study aimed to assess the functional outcome of transanal repair of rectocele using patient symptom scores and quality of life (QOL) instruments. METHOD: Patients who underwent transanal repair for symptomatic rectocele between February 2012 and August 2017 were included. This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A standard questionnaire including the Constipation Scoring System (CSS), the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) and QOL instruments [Patient Assessment of Constipation (PAC)-QOL, Fecal Incontinence QOL Scale, Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)] was administered before and after the operation. Physiological assessment and proctography were performed before and after the operation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. The median follow-up was 36 (6-72) months. Postoperative proctography showed a reduction in rectocele size [34 mm (14-52 mm) vs 10 mm (0-28 mm), P < 0.0001]. Physiological assessment showed no significant postoperative changes. Constipation was improved in 15/21 patients (71%) at 1 year and 14/20 patients (70%) at the mid-term follow-up. The CSS score reduced at 3 months [12 (8-12) vs 6 (1-12), P < 0.0001] and remained significantly reduced over time until the mid-term follow-up. Faecal incontinence was improved in two-thirds patients at 1 year. Four patients developed new-onset faecal incontinence. All the PAC-QOL scale scores significantly improved over time until 1 year, while two of the eight SF-36 scale scores showed significant postoperative improvement. CONCLUSION: Transanal repair for rectocele improves constipation and constipation-specific QOL.

Long-term comparison of physiologic anorectal changes and recurrence between transanal repair and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy in rectocele.

BACKGROUND: Rectocele is often associated with chronic constipation. Various surgical techniques have been described to repair rectoceles, but the results vary. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of transanal repair (TAR) and transanal repair with posterior colporrhaphy (TAR + PC). METHODS: While 44 patients underwent TAR, 49 patients underwent TAR + PC for surgical repair of rectocele. Patients were followed up 3 months post-surgery for anorectal physiological changes. From the entire cohort of patients who underwent the surgical repair, 22 patients who underwent TAR and 25 patients who underwent TAR + PC agreed to participate in the 3-year post-treatment check-up. RESULTS: Out of the 22 patients who underwent TAR, 3 patients (13.6%) scored more than 15 on the constipation scoring system (CSS), while 1 out of 25 patients who underwent TAR + PC scored more than 15 on the CSS 3 months post-treatment, which is considered as recurrence (p = 0.237). With 7 patients from the TAR group (31.8%) and 2 patients from the TAR + PC group (8.0%) showing recurrence of rectocele at 3-year post-treatment follow-up, this study found that TAR + PC had a much lower rate of recurrence than TAR. Furthermore, TAR + PC was found to be more effective than TAR in terms of rectal sensation, sensory threshold (p = 0.001), and early defecation urge (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: TAR + PC can help alleviate some symptoms by restoring the rectal sensation and improving the rectovaginal septum. It can be inferred that the addition of a simple treatment method can lead to a lower rate of recurrence.

Value of colpo-cysto-entero defecography to predict the post operative results in patients with obstructed defecation.

INTRODUCTION: The conventional video colpo-cysto entero defecography describing the morpho- functional imaging features, physiological and pathological of the recto-anal region and pelvic floor . It represents the gold standard examination for the identification and staging of morphological and functional disorders of the recto-anal region and pelvic floor in evacuation dysfunctions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 to January 2013 88 patients underwent STARR procedure for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) caused by single rectocele or internal rectal intussusception. We retrospectively analyzed the collected data,in particular we reviewed the defecography results before surgery. RESULTS: At defecography imaging , 30 patients (34 %) had an anal canal opening between 0 and 5 seconds, 44 (50 %) between 6 and 10 seconds and 14 patients (16 %) over 10 seconds at defecography imaging. The defecography showed an enterocele in 30 patients (34 %) The enterocele was functional in 25 (28,4 %) and stable in 5 (5,6 %) patients. 53 patients have a II° rectocele (60,2 %) and 35 patients a III° rectocele (39,7 %). The average preoperative ODS score was 14 . The average ODS score revaluated at 1 year was 3.1, 4.3 at 3 years an 6,4 after 5 years. The improvement of the ODS score was lower in the subgroup of patients presenting a slow opening of the anal canal (> 10 sec): 7.5 at one year, 9.1 at 3 years and 11 after 5 years follow-up. Also in the subgroup of patients with stable enterocele (5,6 %) the improvement was less evident: 6.7 at 1 year, 8 at 3 years and 9.7 after 5 years follow-up. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We have observed that a coexistence of a long opening time of the anal canal and / or the presence of a stable enterocele are factors that significantly reduce the effectiveness of the surgery leading over time to ODS score values close to those present before surgery. In the fisrt case we suggest a pre and post-operative perineal physiotherapy, in the second case a Dougla's platsy KEY WORDS: Defecography, Obstructed defecation syndrome, Rectocele, Recto-anal prolapse.

Clinical and physiological risk factors for fecal incontinence in chronically constipated women.

BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence (FI) and chronic constipation (CC) are disabling symptoms that cause a significant public health problem. The pathophysiology of combined constipation and FI is not fully understood. Our aim was to delineate the clinical, physiological and anatomical factors that may contribute to the association of FI and CC. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in a pelvic floor unit in a tertiary medical center. Consecutive female patients diagnosed with CC were included, and further divided into two groups according to the co-occurrence of FI. Demographic characteristics, anorectal physiology (obtained by manometry) and pelvic anatomical pathology (as assessed by dynamic pelvic ultrasound) were recorded and subsequently compared. RESULTS: A total of 267 women were included in the study. Of those, 62 patients (23%) had an associated FI (CCFI). The CCFI group had higher body mass index (BMI) levels and a trend toward younger average age as compared to the group without FI (CCNFI). The number of vaginal and instrumental deliveries was similar in both groups. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were significantly lower in the CCFI group (64 ± 21 vs 48 ± 18, p = 0.004 and 141 ± 136.2 vs. 97.5 ± 38.6, p = 0.02, respectively). Rectal sensation abnormalities were common, but did not differ between both groups. Dyssynergic defecation and rectocele were more common in the CCNFI group (68% vs. 51%, p = 0.04 and 39% vs. 24%, p = 0/045, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower anal pressures and higher BMI were found among women with coexisting FI and CC. Pelvic floor anatomical and functional abnormalities are common in women diagnosed with CC and FI, but dyssynergia and diagnosis of significant rectocele, which cause obstructed defecation, were more common in the CCNFI group.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: defecography should be a first-line diagnostic modality in patients with refractory constipation.

BACKGROUND: Defecography is considered the reference standard for the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy and function in patients with a refractory evacuation disorder. However, the overlap of radiologically significant findings seen in patients with chronic constipation (CC) and healthy volunteers is poorly defined. AIM: To systematically review rates of structural and functional abnormalities diagnosed by barium defecography and/or magnetic resonance imaging defecography (MRID) in patients with symptoms of CC and in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Electronic searches of major databases were performed without date restrictions. RESULTS: From a total of 1760 records identified, 175 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 63 studies were included providing data on outcomes of 7519 barium defecographies and 668 MRIDs in patients with CC, and 225 barium defecographies and 50 MRIDs in healthy volunteers. Pathological high-grade (Oxford III and IV) intussuscepta and large (>4 cm) rectoceles were diagnosed in 23.7% (95% CI: 16.8-31.4) and 15.9% (10.4-22.2) of patients, respectively. Enterocele and perineal descent were observed in 16.8% (12.7-21.4) and 44.4% (36.2-52.7) of patients, respectively. Barium defecography detected more intussuscepta than MRID (OR: 1.52 [1.12-2.14]; P = 0.009]). Normative data for both barium defecography and MRID structural and functional parameters were limited, particularly for MRID (only one eligible study). CONCLUSIONS: Pathological structural abnormalities, as well as functional abnormalities, are common in patients with chronic constipation. Since structural abnormalities cannot be evaluated using nonimaging test modalities (balloon expulsion and anorectal manometry), defecography should be considered the first-line diagnostic test if resources allow.

Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support.

BACKGROUND: Prolapse of the anterior and posterior vaginal walls has been generally associated with apical descent and levator ani muscle defects. However, the relative contributions of these factors to the pathophysiology of descent in the different vaginal compartments is not well understood. Furthermore, symptoms uniquely associated with prolapse in these compartments have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to compare the associations between the following: (1) apical support, (2) levator ani muscles, and (3) pelvic floor symptoms in women with posterior-predominant prolapse, anterior-predominant prolapse, and normal support. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study with 2 case arms: 60 women with posterior prolapse, 90 with anterior prolapse, and a referent control arm with 103 asymptomatic subjects with normal support, determined from pelvic organ prolapse quantification examinations. Levator muscle defects were graded from magnetic resonance imaging. Vaginal closure forces above resting were measured with an instrumented speculum during maximal contraction. Pelvic floor symptoms were measured via the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form. RESULTS: Mean point C location in controls was -6.9 cm [1.5] (mean [standard deviation]); and was higher in posterior prolapse (-4.7 cm [2.7], 2.2 cm below controls) than the anterior prolapse group (-1.2 cm [4.1]; 5.6 cm below controls, P < .001 for all comparisons). Normal-appearing muscles (ie, muscle without a visible defect) occurred at similar frequencies in posterior prolapse (45%) and controls (51%, P = .43) but less often in anterior prolapse (28%, P ≤ .03 for pairwise comparisons). Major levator ani defects occurred at similar rates in women with posterior (33%) and anterior prolapse (42%, P = .27) but less often in controls (16%, P ≤ .012 for both pairwise comparisons). Similarly, there were significant differences in generated vaginal closure forces across the 3 groups, with the prolapse groups generating weaker closure forces than the control group (P = .004), but the differences between the 2 prolapse groups were not significant after controlling for prolapse size (P = .43). Pelvic floor symptoms were more severe for the posterior (mean Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory score, 129) and anterior prolapse groups (score, 128) than the controls (score, 40.2, P < .001 for both comparisons); the difference between the 2 prolapse groups was not significant (P = .83). CONCLUSION: Posterior-predominant prolapse involves an almost 3-fold less apical descent below normal than anterior-predominant vaginal prolapse. Levator ani defects and muscle impairment also have a lower impact. Pelvic floor symptoms reflect the presence and size of prolapse more than the predominant lax vaginal compartment.

The association between a positive lactulose methane breath test and rectocele in constipated patients

Objectives: Rectocele with constipation might be related to methane (CH4) producing intestinal bacteria. We investigated the breath CH4 levels and the clinical characteristics of colorectal motility in constipated patients with rectocele. Methods: A database of consecutive female outpatients was reviewed for the evaluation of constipation according to the Rome III criteria. The patients underwent the lactulose CH4 breath test (LMBT), colon marker study, anorectal manometry, defecography and bowel symptom questionnaire. The profiles of the lactulose breath test (LBT) in 33 patients with rectocele (with size ≥ 2 cm) and 26 patients with functional constipation (FC) were compared with the breath test results of 30 healthy control subjects. Results: The mean size of rectocele was 3.52 ± 1.06 cm. The rate of a positive LMBT (LMBT+) was significantly higher in patients with rectocele (33.3%) than in those with FC (23.1%) or healthy controls (6.7%) (p = 0.04). Breath CH4 concentration was positively correlated with rectosigmoid colon transit time in rectocele patients (γ = 0.481, p < 0.01). A maximum high pressure zone pressure > 155 mmHg was a significant independent factor of LMBT+ in rectocele patients (OR = 8.93, 95% CI = 1.14-71.4, p = 0.04). Conclusions: LMBT+ might be expected in constipated patients with rectocele. Moreover, increased rectosigmoid colonic transit or high anorectal pressure might be associated with CH4 breath levels. Breath CH4 could be an important therapeutic target for managing constipated patients with rectocele (AU)

No disponible

Clinical outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation syndrome at 10-year follow-up.

AIM: The long-term efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for surgical management of obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) has not been evaluated. Therefore, we investigated the long-term efficacy (> 10 years) of STARR for treatment of ODS related to rectocele or rectal intussusception and the factors that predict treatment outcome. METHOD: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted on prospectively collected data. Seventy-four consecutive patients who underwent STARR for ODS between January 2005 and December 2006 in two Italian hospitals were included. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients [66 women; median age 61 (29-77) years] underwent STARR for ODS. No serious postoperative complications were recorded. Ten years postoperatively, 60 (81%) patients completed the expected follow-up. Twenty-three patients (38%) reported persistent perineal pain and 13 (22%) experienced the urge to defaecate. ODS symptoms recurred in 24 (40%) patients after 10 years. At the 10-year follow-up, 35% of patients were very satisfied and 28% would recommend STARR and undergo the same procedure again if necessary. In contrast, 21% of patients would not select STARR again. Previous uro-gynaecological or rectal surgery and high constipation scores were identified as risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled transanal rectal resection significantly improves the symptoms of ODS in the short term. In the long term STARR is less effective, however.

Anal Sphincters Evaluation by Endoanal Ultrasound in Obstructed Defecation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate anal sphincter abnormalities detected by endoanal ultrasound in obstructed defecation due to rectocele and rectal intussusception. METHODS: The retrospective analysis includes 45 patients with obstructed defecation syndrome due to rectocele and/or rectal intussusception with or without fecal incontinence, and submitted to endoanal ultrasound. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent (n = 42) were women (mean age of 63 ± 12 years), and 47% (n = 21) of the patients had fecal incontinence. In total, 29% (n = 13) had a previous anorectal surgery, and 93% (n = 39) of the women had a previous vaginal delivery. An isolated rectal intussusception was diagnosed in 20% (n = 9) of the patients, an isolated rectocele in 24% (n = 11), and rectal intussusception and rectocele in 56% (n = 25). Thirty-six percent of patients had anal sphincter lacerations (n = 16): 12% (n = 2) had only internal laceration, 69% (n = 11) had only external laceration, and 19% (n = 3) had both. Two patients had a thinner internal anal sphincter with 0.9 and 1.2 mm, respectively. In total, 25% of the patients without fecal incontinence had an occult anal sphincter laceration, and all were women with an external sphincter laceration in the anterior quadrant and a previous vaginal delivery. In patients with obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence, 48% had sphincter lacerations. Previous anorectal surgery was a predictor of anal sphincter laceration (odds ratio [OR] 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.214-18.971; P = .025), but fecal incontinence (OR 2.7; 95% CI = 0.774-9.613; P = .119) and previous vaginal delivery (OR 1.250; 95% CI = 0.104-15.011; P = .860) were not. CONCLUSIONS: Endoanal ultrasound should be considered in obstructed defecation with or without fecal incontinence, especially if surgical correction is planned.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation in patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities-a Chinese pilot study.

AIM: As laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) gained increasing popularity in the past decade, studies from non-western area remain rare. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LVR for obstructed defecation (OD) in Chinese patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities. METHODS: A series of 19 consecutive patients is presented undergoing LVR for OD. All patients showed various forms of pelvic structural abnormalities which were verified by dynamic defecography exam. Data was prospectively recorded and the functional outcomes were evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL). RESULTS: Pelvic structural abnormalities of the 19 patients included external rectal prolapse (ER) in 10.5% (2/19), high grade internal rectal prolapse (IR) in 57.8% (11/19), rectocele in 52.6% (10/19), enterocele in 15.7% (3/19), cystocele/vaginal prolapse in 15.7 (3/19), descending perineum (DP) in 63.5% (12/19). 89.4% patients (17/19) showed at least two co-existed abnormalities and 15.7% (3/19) showed multicompartmental abnormalities. The mean follow-up was 9 months (range 1-18). No mesh-related complication was observed. At last available follow-up (LAFU), improvement of OD symptom was observed in 15 (78.9%) patients, the mean scores of CCCS decreased from 17 to 10 (p < 0.05), all four subsets of PAC-QoL scores improved, and three of them (physical discomfort, worries and concerns, satisfaction) showed statistical significance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy appears to be a safe and effective procedure for obstructed defecation in Chinese patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities in short-term follow-up.

Transvaginal Mesh and Transanal Resection to Treat Outlet Obstruction Constipation Caused by Rectocele.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the curative effect of transvaginal mesh repair (TVMR) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in treating outlet obstruction constipation caused by rectocele. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who had outlet obstruction constipation caused by rectocele were retrospectively analyzed and 39 patients were enrolled the study. Patients were assigned to either the TVMR or STARR group. Postoperative factors such as complications, pain, recurrence rate, and operative time were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Total effective rate was 100% in both groups. No long-term chronic pain occurred and discomfort rate of tenesmus was higher in the STARR group than in the TVMR group. Postoperative defecography showed that the rectocele depth was significantly reduced, and the prolapse of the rectal mucosa and the lower rectal capacity was also decreased. Four cases had mesh exposure in the TVMR group and 2 cases in the STARR group had anastomotic bleeding after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS For outlet obstruction constipation caused by rectocele, TVMR and STARR both obtained satisfactory results. Although TVMR is complex with longer operative time and hospitalization period, its long-term effect is better than that of STARR.

Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations that can be used as guidance for standardized approach regarding indications, patient preparation, sequences acquisition, interpretation and reporting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis and grading of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). METHODS: The technique included critical literature between 1993 and 2013 and expert consensus about MRI protocols by the pelvic floor-imaging working group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) from one Egyptian and seven European institutions. Data collection and analysis were achieved in 5 consecutive steps. Eighty-two items were scored to be eligible for further analysis and scaling. Agreement of at least 80 % was defined as consensus finding. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 88 % of 82 items. Recommended reporting template should include two main sections for measurements and grading. The pubococcygeal line (PCL) is recommended as the reference line to measure pelvic organ prolapse. The recommended grading scheme is the "Rule of three" for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), while a rectocele and ARJ descent each has its specific grading system. CONCLUSION: This literature review and expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidance for MR imaging and reporting of PFD. KEY POINTS: • These recommendations highlight the most important prerequisites to obtain a diagnostic PFD-MRI. • Static, dynamic and evacuation sequences should be generally performed for PFD evaluation. • The recommendations were constructed through consensus among 13 radiologists from 8 institutions.

Intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown how initial cervix location and cervical support resistance to traction, which we term "apical support stiffness," compare in women with different patterns of pelvic organ support. Defining a normal range of apical support stiffness is important to better understand the pathophysiology of apical support loss. OBJECTIVE: The aims of our study were to determine whether: (1) women with normal apical support on clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification, but with vaginal wall prolapse (cystocele and/or rectocele), have the same intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness as women with normal pelvic support; and (2) all women with apical prolapse have abnormal intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness. A third objective was to identify clinical and biomechanical factors independently associated with clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point C. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an observational study of women with a full spectrum of pelvic organ support scheduled to undergo gynecologic surgery. All women underwent a preoperative clinic examination, including Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification. Cervix starting location and the resistance (stiffness) of its supports to being moved steadily in the direction of a traction force that increased from 0-18 N was measured intraoperatively using a computer-controlled servoactuator device. Women were divided into 3 groups for analysis according to their pelvic support as classified using the clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification: (1) "normal/normal" was women with normal apical (C < -5 cm) and vaginal (Ba and Bp < 0 cm) support; (2) normal/prolapse had normal apical support (C < -5 cm) but prolapse of the anterior or posterior vaginal walls (Ba and/or Bp ≥ 0 cm); and (3) prolapse/prolapse had both apical and vaginal wall prolapse (C > -5 cm and Ba and/or Bp ≥ 0 cm). Demographics, intraoperative cervix locations, and apical support stiffness values were then compared. Normal range of cervix location during clinic examination and operative testing was defined by the total range of values observed in the normal/normal group. The proportion of women in each group with cervix locations within and outside the normal range was determined. Linear regression was performed to identify variables independently associated with clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point C. RESULTS: In all, 52 women were included: 14 in the normal/normal group, 11 in the normal/prolapse group, and 27 in the prolapse/prolapse group. At 1 N of traction force in the operating room, 50% of women in the normal/prolapse group had cervix locations outside the normal range while 10% had apical support stiffness outside the normal range. Of women in the prolapse/prolapse group, 81% had cervix locations outside the normal range and 8% had apical support stiffness outside the normal range. Similar results for cervix locations were observed at 18 N of traction force; however the proportion of women with apical support stiffness outside the normal range increased to 50% in the normal/prolapse group and 59% in the prolapse/prolapse group. The prolapse/prolapse group had statistically lower apical support stiffness compared to the normal/normal group with increased traction from 1-18 N (0.47 ± 0.18 N/mm vs 0.63 ± 0.20 N/mm, P = .006), but all other comparisons were nonsignificant. After controlling for age, parity, body mass index, and apical support stiffness, cervix location at 1 N traction force remained an independent predictor of clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point C, but only in the prolapse/prolapse group. CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of women with cystocele and/or rectocele but normal apical support in the clinic had cervix locations outside the normal range under intraoperative traction, while 19% of women with uterine prolapse had normal apical support. Identifying women whose apical support falls outside a defined normal range may be a more accurate way to identify those who truly need a hysterectomy and/or an apical support procedure and to spare those who do not.

Comparison of dynamic magnetic resonance defaecography with rectal contrast and conventional defaecography for posterior pelvic floor compartment prolapse.

AIM: This study compared the diagnostic capabilities of dynamic magnetic resonance defaecography (D-MRI) with conventional defaecography (CD, reference standard) in patients with symptoms of prolapse of the posterior compartment of the pelvic floor. METHOD: Forty-five consecutive patients underwent CD and D-MRI. Outcome measures were the presence or absence of rectocele, enterocele, intussusception, rectal prolapse and the descent of the anorectal junction on straining, measured in millimetres. Cohen's Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the positive and negative likelihood ratio of D-MRI were compared with CD. Cohen's Kappa and Pearson's correlation coefficient were calculated and regression analysis was performed to determine inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were available for analysis. D-MRI underreported rectocele formation with a difference in prevalence (CD 77.8% vs D-MRI 55.6%), mean protrusion (26.4 vs 22.7 mm, P = 0.039) and 11 false negative results, giving a low sensitivity of 0.62 and a NPV of 0.31. For the diagnosis of enterocele, D-MRI was inferior to CD, with five false negative results, giving a low sensitivity of 0.17 and high specificity (1.0) and PPV (1.0). Nine false positive intussusceptions were seen on D-MRI with only two missed. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of D-MRI for diagnosing rectocele and enterocele is less than that of CD. D-MRI, however, appears superior to CD in identifying intussusception. D-MRI and CD are complementary imaging techniques in the evaluation of patients with symptoms of prolapse of the posterior compartment.

Integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound in pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction.

AIM: Imaging for pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction includes defaecation proctography. Integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound (transvaginal, transperineal, endoanal) may be an alternative. This study assesses ultrasound accuracy for the detection of rectocele, intussusception, enterocele and dyssynergy compared with defaecation proctography, and determines if ultrasound can predict symptoms and findings on proctography. Treatment is examined. METHOD: Images of 323 women who underwent integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound and defaecation proctography between 2011 and 2014 were blindly reviewed. The size and grade of rectocele, enterocele, intussusception and dyssynergy were noted on both, using proctography as the gold standard. Barium trapping in a rectocele or a functionally significant enterocele was noted on proctography. Demographics and Obstructive Defaecation Symptom scores were collated. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of ultrasound was 73% for rectocele, 79% for intussusception and 91% for enterocele. The negative predictive value for dyssynergy was 99%. Agreement was moderate for rectocele and intussusception, good for enterocele and fair for dyssynergy. The majority of rectoceles that required surgery (59/61) and caused barium trapping (85/89) were detected on ultrasound. A rectocele seen on both transvaginal and transperineal scanning was more likely to require surgery than if seen with only one mode (P = 0.0001). If there was intussusception on ultrasound the patient was more likely to have surgery (P = 0.03). An enterocele visualized on ultrasound was likely to be functionally significant on proctography (P = 0.02). There was, however, no association between findings on imaging and symptoms. CONCLUSION: Integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound provides a useful screening tool for women with defaecatory dysfunction such that defaecatory imaging can avoided in some.

Correlation Between Echodefecography and 3-Dimensional Vaginal Ultrasonography in the Detection of Perineal Descent in Women With Constipation Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Defecography is an established method of evaluating dynamic anorectal dysfunction, but conventional defecography does not allow for visualization of anatomic structures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the use of dynamic 3-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography for evaluating perineal descent in comparison with echodefecography (3-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography) and to study the relationship between perineal descent and symptoms and anatomic/functional abnormalities of the pelvic floor. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a large university tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive female patients were eligible if they had pelvic floor dysfunction, obstructed defecation symptoms, and a score >6 on the Cleveland Clinic Florida Constipation Scale. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient underwent both echodefecography and dynamic 3-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography to evaluate posterior pelvic floor dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Normal perineal descent was defined on echodefecography as puborectalis muscle displacement ≤2.5 cm; excessive perineal descent was defined as displacement >2.5 cm. RESULTS: Of 61 women, 29 (48%) had normal perineal descent; 32 (52%) had excessive perineal descent. Endovaginal ultrasonography identified 27 of the 29 patients in the normal group as having anorectal junction displacement ≤1 cm (mean = 0.6 cm; range, 0.1-1.0 cm) and a mean anorectal junction position of 0.6 cm (range, 0-2.3 cm) above the symphysis pubis during the Valsalva maneuver and correctly identified 30 of the 32 patients in the excessive perineal descent group. The κ statistic showed almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86) between the 2 methods for categorization into the normal and excessive perineal descent groups. Perineal descent was not related to fecal or urinary incontinence or anatomic and functional factors (sphincter defects, pubovisceral muscle defects, levator hiatus area, grade II or III rectocele, intussusception, or anismus). LIMITATIONS: The study did not include a control group without symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography is a reliable technique for assessment of perineal descent. Using this technique, excessive perineal descent can be defined as displacement of the anorectal junction >1 cm and/or its position below the symphysis pubis on Valsalva maneuver.

Transverse incision transvaginal rectocele repair combined with levatorplasty and biological graft insertion: technical details and case series outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is twofold: first, to detail our operative approach to rectocele repair, and second, to report on the outcomes. METHODS: Transverse incision transvaginal rectocele repair combined with levatorplasty and biological graft placement is detailed using hand-drawn sketches and intraoperative photographs. All patients with symptoms of functional constipation and non-emptying rectocele operated on from May 2007 to March 2013 at our institution were enrolled in this study. Data from a prospectively maintained database were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes were studied using a validated 31-point obstructed defecation (OD) scoring system. Follow-up was 1 year. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients underwent the procedure. The mean age of patients was 55 years (range 28-79 years). The OD severity score improved from the preoperative mean of 21.6 to postoperative mean of 5.5 (p = 0.001). Three out of four patients with initial symptoms of dyspareunia (75%) reported significant improvement in dyspareunia, while 2 out of 19 patients without initial symptoms of dyspareunia (11%) reported mild dyspareunia following the repair. One patient (4%) required operative drainage of a hematoma. Another patient (4%) developed symptomatic recurrence which was confirmed radiologically. CONCLUSIONS: In properly selected patients, the technique described leads to significant improvement in symptoms of OD and low recurrence without an increased rate of dyspareunia.