Vaginal Native Tissue Repair for Posterior Compartment Prolapse: Long-Term Analysis of Sexual Function and Quality of Life in 151 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of vaginal native tissue repair for symptomatic rectocele and to evaluate the impact on quality of life (QoL) and sexual function. METHODS: One hundred fifty-one patients affected by rectocele stage II or higher according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System were enrolled. Patients underwent vaginal native tissue repair. Postoperative assessments consisted in a clinical examination and assessment of posterior compartment symptoms and defecatory dysfunctions. These were conducted 1, 12, and 60 months after surgery. Patients completed the Prolapse Quality-of-Life questionnaire, the Pelvic Floor Disability Index, the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 64 (60-72) months. The median operative time was 55 (37-127) minutes, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 2 (2-4) days. No intraoperative complications occurred. At median follow-up, an objective cure rate of 88.2% was observed. Seventeen patients (11.3%) showed recurrent posterior vaginal descent stage II or higher. Defecatory dysfunctions, vaginal digitation, and vaginal bulge decreased significantly. The change of values of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life, Pelvic Floor Disability Index, and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire questionnaires has shown a significant improvement in the QoL after surgery. The percentage of patients regularly practicing sexual activity increased, and dyspareunia decreased after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal native tissue repair is a safe and effective procedure for symptomatic rectocele, with a low rate of complications, and improves pelvic organ prolapse-related symptoms, QoL, and sexual function.

Transperineal rectocele repair: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Transperineal rectocele repairs, either as isolated fascial repair or in combination with mesh augmentation, are hypothesized to reduce the risk of complications compared with alternative techniques. AIM: The aim of this study was to ascertain long-term success and complication rates following transperineal rectocele repairs. METHOD: A literature search of PubMed and Embase was performed using the terms 'transperineal rectocele', 'rectocele', 'transperineal' and 'repair'. Prospective studies, case series and retrospective case note analyses from 1 January 1994 to 1 December 2016 were included. Those that detailed outcomes of the transperineal approach or compared it to transanal/transvaginal approaches were included. The main outcome measures were reported complications and functional outcome scores. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included. Of 566 patients, 333 (58.8%) underwent a transperineal rectocele repair and 220 (41.2%) a transanal repair. Complications were identified in 27 (12.3%) of the 220 transanal repairs and in 41 (12.3%) of the 333 transperineal repairs. A significant complication following transperineal repair was noted in eight studies. There are not enough data to make a reliable comparison between mesh and non-mesh transperineal repairs or to compare biological and synthetic mesh use. LIMITATIONS: Outcome reporting differed between studies, precluding a full meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Transperineal rectocele repair offers an effective method of symptom improvement and appears to have a similar complication rate as transanal rectocele repair. Concomitant use of synthetic and biological mesh augmentation is becoming more common; however, high-quality comparative data are lacking, so a direct comparison between surgical approaches is not yet possible.

Native-tissue repair of isolated primary rectocele compared with nonabsorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated patient-reported outcomes and complications after treatment of isolated primary rectocele in routine health-care settings using native-tissue repair or nonabsorbable mesh. METHODS: We used prospective data from the Swedish National Register for Gynaecological Surgery and included 3988 women with a primary operation for rectocele between 2006 and 2014: 3908 women had native-tissue repair, 80 were operated with nonabsorbable mesh. No concurrent operations were performed. Pre- and perioperative data were collected from doctors and patients. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated 2 and 12 months after the operation. Only validated questionnaires were used. RESULTS: One year after native-tissue repair, 77.8 % (76.4-79.6) felt they were cured, which was defined as never or hardly ever feeling genital protrusion; 74.0 % (72.2-75.7) were very satisfied or satisfied, and 84 % (82.8-85.9) reported improvement of symptoms. After mesh repair, 89.8 % (77.8-96.6) felt cured, 69.2 % (54.9-81.3) were very satisfied or satisfied, and 86.0 % (72.1-94.7) felt improvement. No significant differences were found between groups. Organ damage was found in 16 (0.4 %) patients in the native-tissue repair group compared with one (1.3 %) patient in the mesh group [odds ratio (OR) 3.08; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.07-20.30]. The rate of de novo dyspareunia after native-tissue repair was 33.1 % (30.4-35.8), comparable with that after mesh repair. The reoperation rate was 1.1 % (0.8-1.5) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Most patients were cured and satisfied after native-tissue repair of the posterior vaginal wall, and the patient-reported outcomes were comparable with results after mesh repair. The risk of serious complications and reoperation were comparable between groups.

Effects of transvaginal repair of symptomatic rectocele on symptom-specific distress and impact on quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: To determine symptom-specific distress and quality-of-life impact outcomes among women who had undergone transvaginal repair of symptomatic rectocele. METHODS: Women who underwent transvaginal repair of symptomatic rectocele at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA, between April 2006 and June 2009 were included in a retrospective case series. Minimum follow-up was 1 year post-surgery. Women who underwent concomitant surgery, other than perineoplasty and/or midurethral sling, were excluded. End points were assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). RESULTS: Overall, 113 women underwent repair of symptomatic rectocele, of whom 69 (61.1%) completed preoperative questionnaires and 66 (58.4%) responded to follow-up questionnaires. Mean time from surgery was 31.2±11.2 months. PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores were significantly improved following surgery, with a median pre- and post-surgery difference of 35.4 (P<0.001) and 31.0 (P=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent transvaginal repair of symptomatic rectocele reported improvements in symptom-specific distress and impact on quality of life.

[Treatment of rectocele and rectal mucosal prolapse with mucosal flaps excision and with manual reconstruction]. / Trattamento del rettocele e del prolasso mucoso del retto con escissione a lembi della mucosa con sutura manuale (Tecnica di "Delorme interna" modificata).

BACKGROUND: Rectocele is defined as an erniation of the anterior rectal and vaginal wall in the vaginal lumen due to the loss of rectovaginal septum. Rectal mucosal prolapse was characterized by the protrusion of the mucosa alone in the rectal lumen. The Authors, herein, reported the results of a new surgical technique with the excision of one or more mucosal or muco-muscolar flaps and reconstruction with Sequential Transfixed Stitch Technique (STST) using a anal retractor designed by them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new surgical technique was applied to 40 consecutive patients with rectal mucosal prolapse and 20 with symptomatic rectocele of III degree assessed with proctological evaluation, digital examination of the anal canal, sphere test, defecography and total colonoscopy were submitted to STST. Patients with previous colorectal or pelvic surgery were excluded from the study. The quality of life was defined using a questionnaire before surgery, at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Data were evaluated according to the Agachan-Wexner score. RESULTS: The new technique was correctly performed in all the cases without early and late complications. The mean value was of 18.2 according to the Agachan-Wexner for patients with rectocele and 17.6 for rectal mucosal prolapse, both significantly improved score in comparison to pre-operatory condition (p<0.05). Surgical procedure with flaps excision and manual procedure of STST was judged satisfactory in 89% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of symptomatic rectocele and rectal mucosal prolapse with multiple excision of exceeding tissue flaps and the reconstruction with STST manually conducted showed optimal results for the surgical treatment of in our experience with a significant improvement of quality of life referred by the patients and absence of significant post-operative side effects.

Surgical repair of pelvic-floor prolapse: lessons learned from longitudinal follow-up of quality-of-life survey.

BACKGROUND: Scant evidence has been reported on the evaluation of quality-of-life (QOL) in patients who had undergone surgical treatment due to pelvic floor prolapse including cystocele. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of surgical intervention on patients' QOL before and after surgery. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2007, 135 patients (median age: 66.6 years) with pelvic floor prolapse including cystocele underwent bladder neck suspension with anterior/posterior colporrhaphy. The follow-up period was 39.6 months. Seventy-two patients (53 %) had urinary incontinence. The cystocele was graded as mild (grade 2), moderate (grade 3), and severe (grade 4) in 35, 60, and 40, respectively, according to the Baden-Walker classification. A urodynamic study was performed in 69 patients (51 %) who had obstructive symptoms with 100 ml or more of postvoid residual urine. Postoperative QOL was longitudinally assessed in 114 patients by scoring three disease-specific items (sensation of vaginal bulging, obstructive symptoms, urinary incontinence), and one overall health-related QOL (HR-QOL), and compared with corresponding baseline scores. RESULTS: A longitudinal study demonstrated that a significant improvement in these symptoms was sustained at a median follow-up of 62.2 months. HR-QOL was significantly associated with vitality assessed by SF 36 (p = 0.036). Multivariate analysis revealed that update urinary incontinence, pre-operative HR-QOL was independent prognostic factors for predicting postoperative patient's satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Although surgical repair of pelvic floor prolapse can achieve acceptable results with intermediate-term durability as well as improving the QOL, preoperative patients' HR-QOL may be considered in the decision making process for treatment.

Body image and sexuality in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of physical changes associated with pelvic organ prolapse on a woman's body image and how that may influence sexuality has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the implementation and utility of a body image questionnaire in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Two research questions were asked: (1) What is the impact of pelvic organ prolapse on women's body image and how does this affect their sexual health?, and (2) Does the Vaginal Changes Sexual and Body Esteem (VSBE) Scale show utility for use in assessing body image and sexual health in women with pelvic organ prolapse? METHOD: A qualitative design was used for this study. Telephone interviews were conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire and an adapted body image and sexuality questionnaire specific to genital body image. RESULTS: Thirteen women with pelvic organ prolapse completed the study. Eight women were classified as sexually active, and 5 women were not sexually active. Data showed women with pelvic organ prolapse, classified as sexually active, scored significantly lower on the VSBE scale than women who were not sexually active. There was a positive correlation between severity of prolapse and VSBE scores. CONCLUSION: The VSBE scale questionnaire showed utility and potential for demonstrating change in body image in women with pelvic organ prolapse. This tool may assist clinicians in a more thorough assessment of body image and sexuality in this population of women.

Patient reported and anatomical outcomes after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

AIM: Primary aim was to modify Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) to assess pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Arabic Muslim women. Secondary aim was to compare functional and anatomical outcomes of POP repair. METHODS: Questionnaire. A characteristic (prayer) was added to PFIQ. Linguistic validation of questionnaires was then done. Twenty cases were enrolled in a pilot study to test internal consistency and reliability. Subsequent study. Prospective study included women with symptomatic POP >or= stage II. History, examination by POP-Q, and administration of PFDI and PFIQ, were done before and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Questionnaire. Internal consistency of added question was good (Cronbach alpha = 0.78). Test-retest reliability of individual PFIQ items was variable. Subsequent Study. Between September 2004 and February 2007, 78 consecutive women were included. Cystocele, rectocele, and no site predominated in 74.4%, 17.9% and 7.7% of cases, respectively. Preoperatively 19.2%, 15.4% and 47.4% reported stress, urge, and mixed incontinence, respectively. Overall and individual urinary symptoms scores improved significantly after surgery. There were significant improvements in individual symptoms of constipation, splint to defecate and losing not well formed stools. Low self-esteem was most negative impact of prolapse on quality of life (QoL) followed by prayer. After surgery 90% of subjects had anatomical cure. After surgery, QoL issues are significantly related to anatomic location of prolapse as determined by POP-Q. CONCLUSIONS: Modified PFIQ and PFDI are suitable to assess POP among Muslim women. Postoperatively, many prolapse-related symptoms and QoL significantly improve after surgery on the short term with an anatomic cure rate of 90%.

Sexual function in women after rectocele repair with acellular porcine dermis graft vs site-specific rectovaginal fascia repair.

The objective of the study was to compare preoperative and postoperative sexual function between women undergoing rectocele repair with porcine dermis graft and women undergoing site-specific repair of rectovaginal fascia. A standardized, validated questionnaire (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire [PISQ]) was used to collect preoperative sexual function data from 100 patients with rectocele pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage 2 or greater. Fifty women underwent rectocele repair utilizing porcine dermis graft (group 1) and 50 women underwent a site-specific repair of the rectovaginal fascia (group 2). The same questionnaire was administered to all subjects 6 months after surgery. The two groups were similar in age, race, parity, prior hysterectomy, and postmenopausal hormone use. Preoperative sexual function scores were similar in the two groups (group 1 81.4+/-7.3 and group 2: 83.6+/-8.2, p=1.0). Six months after surgery, PISQ scores in group 1 significantly increased (score increase 19.9+/-2.2, p=0.01). The mean increase in PISQ scores for group 2 was 6.9+/-3.1 (p=0.08). When compared with group 2, subjects undergoing rectocele repair with porcine dermis graft scored significantly higher on the PISQ 6 months after surgery (group 1 101.3+/-6.4 and group 2 89.7+/-7.1, p=0.01). We conclude that rectocele repair using porcine dermis graft is associated with improved sexual functioning when compared with site-specific rectovaginal fascia repair.

[Quality of life, symptoms of dyschezia, and anatomy after correction of rectal motility disorder]. / Qualité de vie, symptômes de dyschésie et anatomie après correction d'un trouble de la statique rectale par voie basse.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the quality of life of patients suffering from dyschezia and its correlation with symptomatic complaints and anatomical abnormalities, before and after elective surgery for rectal static disorder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted using a general quality of life questionnaire (SF36) and a constipation specific score (PAC-QoL), a dyschezia symptom score, and defecography. RESULTS: Thirty-eight female dyschesic patients (mean age 54 years) underwent surgery for rectocele with (n=16) or without (n=14) internal rectal prolapse, an isolated internal rectal prolapse (n=3), or a total rectal prolapse (n=5). Preoperative quality of life was low, correlated with the intensity of dyschezia. Seven months after surgery, quality of life and dyschezia improved independently of the amplitude of the anatomical correction. More items improved in the constipation specific score than on the quality of life questionnaire; they were correlated with the course of dyschezia symptoms. Neither incontinence nor irritable bowel syndrome affected evolution of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: Surgery improved initially low quality of life and symptomatic complaints in patients with dyschezia and a rectal static disorder, independently of anatomic repair. Differences in changes observed in the PAC-QoL and SF36 suggest different fields of application.