Re-hospital admission, morbidity and mortality rate in patients undergoing tunnelled catheter implantation for haemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the effort to increase the proportion of patients starting dialysis on native accesses, many of them are still dialyzed on tunnelled catheter. Catheter-related complications are often serious and responsible for re-hospital admission, high morbidity and mortality. Several multicenter trials have reported results in the use of tunnelled dialysis catheter (TDC). However, few single-center studies have been published to verify the outcome from real-world experience. This study presents our center's experience in managing such patients in the context of relevant literature. METHODS: Demographics and operative data were retrospectively collected from medical charts. A prospective follow-up was performed to investigate complications, number of re-hospitalizations and mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to evaluate catheter primary patency and patients' overall survival. RESULTS: Among a total 298 haemodialysis accesses interventions, 105 patients (56 men, 53.3% and 49 women, 46.7%) with a median age of 65 years (range 32-88 years) were included in the study. All insertions were successful with an optimal blood flow achieved during the first session of dialysis in all cases. A catheter-related complication was detected in 33.3% (n=35) patients (48.6% infections; 28.6% TDC dysfunction; 14.3% local complications; 5.7% accidental catheter retractions; 2.8% catheter migrations). At a median follow-up of 10.5±8.5 months, a total of 85 patients (80.9%) was re-hospitalized, in 28 cases (26.7%) for a catheter-related cause. The median catheter patency rate was 122 days. At the last follow-up, 39 patients (37.1%) were still dialyzed on catheter, 30(28.6%) were dialyzed on an arteriovenous fistula and 7(6.7%) received a kidney transplantation. Two patients (2%) were transferred to peritoneal dialysis and two patients (2%) recover from renal insufficiency. Mortality rate was 23.8% (25 patients). Causes of death were myocardial infarction (n=13, 52%), sepsis (n=9, 36%); one patient (4%) died from pneumonia, one (4%) from uremic encephalopathy and one (4%) from massive hematemesis. CONCLUSION: TDCs may represent the only possible access in some patients, however they are burned with a high rate of complications, re-hospital admission and mortality. Results from this institutional experience are in line with previously published literature data in terms of morbidity and mortality. The present results reiterate once more that TDC must be regarded as a temporary solution while permanent access creation should be prioritized. Strict surveillance should be held in patients having TDC for the early identification of complications allowing the prompt treatment and modifying the catheter insertion site whenever needed.

Current dialyzer classification in Japan and mortality risk in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Dialyzers are classified into five types based on their ß2-microglobulin clearance rate and albumin sieving coefficient: Ia, Ib, IIa, and IIb. In addition, a new classification system introduced a type S dialyzer. However, limited information is available regarding the impact of dialyzer type on patient outcomes. A cohort study was conducted using data from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry database. Total 181,804 patients on hemodialysis (HD) were included in the study, categorized into four groups (type Ia, IIa, IIb, and S). The associations between each group and two-year all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Furthermore, propensity score-matching analysis was performed. By the end of 2019, 34,185 patients on dialysis had died. After adjusting for all confounders, the risk for all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the type IIa, and S groups than in the type Ia group. These significant findings were consistent after propensity score matching. In conclusion, our findings suggest that super high-flux dialyzers, with a ß2-microglobulin clearance of ≥ 70 mL/min, may be beneficial for patients on HD, regardless of their albumin sieving coefficient. In addition, type S dialyzers may be beneficial for elderly and malnourished patients on dialysis.Trial registration number: UMIN000018641.

Superiority of high sensitivity cardiac troponin I over NT-proBNP and adiponectin for 7-year mortality in stable patients receiving haemodialysis.

Patients on haemodialysis (HD) have high mortality risk, and prognostic values of the major cardiovascular biomarkers cardiac troponin I (cTnI), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and adiponectin should be ascertained over longer follow-up periods using higher-sensitivity assays, which we undertook. In 221 HD patients, levels of high-sensitivity (hs)-cTnI, NT-proBNP, and adiponectin, were measured using high-sensitivity assays, and their associations with all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) were prospectively investigated for 7 years. Higher hs-cTnI and NT-proBNP levels were significant risk factors for ACM and CVM in the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses in a model including hs-cTnI and NT-proBNP identified log hs-cTnI, but not log NT-proBNP, as an independent risk factor for ACM (HR 2.12, P < 0.02) and CVM (HR 4.48, P < 0.0005). Stepwise analyses identified a high hs-cTnI tertile as a risk factor for ACM (HR 2.31, P < 0.01) and CVM (HR 6.70, P < 0.001). The addition of hs-cTnI to a model including age, CRP, DM, and NT-proBNP significantly improved the discrimination of ACM and CVM each over 7 years. Conclusively, hs-cTnI was superior to NT-proBNP and adiponectin in predicting ACM and CVM over 7 years in HD patients, suggesting the significance of baseline hs-cTnI measurements in long-term management.

Mortality of Peritoneal Dialysis versus Hemodialysis in Older Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal choice of dialysis modality remains contentious in older adults threatened by advanced age and high risk of comorbidities. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies to assess mortality risk between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) in older adults using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database from inception to June 1, 2022. The outcome of interest is all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-one eligible studies with >774,000 older patients were included. Pooled analysis showed that PD had a higher mortality rate than HD in older dialysis population (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10-1.25). When stratified by co-variables, our study showed an increased mortality risk of PD versus HD in older patients with diabetes mellitus or comorbidity who underwent longer dialysis duration (more than 3 years) or who started dialysis before 2010. However, definitive conclusions were constrained by significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: From the survival point of view, caution is needed to employ PD for long-term use in older populations with diabetes mellitus or comorbid conditions. However, a tailored treatment choice needs to take account of what matters to older adults at an individual level, especially in the context of limited survival improvements and loss of quality of life. Further research is still awaited to conclude this topic.

Japanese Study of the Effects of AMG (α1-Microglobulin) Reduction Rates on Survival (JAMREDS): A Protocol of a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in dialysis therapy have made it possible to remove middle molecules. Removal of small-middle molecules, such as ß2-microglobulin, can now be achieved with conventional hemodialysis (HD), and removal of large-middle molecules has become a target, particularly for α1-microglobulin (AMG, 33 kD). The AMG reduction rate has emerged as a target for improvement of various clinical symptoms, but the effects on prognosis have yet to be determined. The "Japanese study of the effects of AMG (α1-microglobulin) reduction rates on survival" (JAMREDS) was started in April 2020, with the goal of determining if the AMG reduction rate associates with the risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. METHODS: JAMREDS is a prospective observational study in patients on HD to examine the effects of: (1) AMG reduction rate on survival outcome and CVD events; (2) dialysis treatment modalities (HD, intermittent infusion hemodiafiltration(iHDF), pre/post-dilution online HDF) on survival and CVD events (based on AMG reduction rates with treatment mode); and (3) AMG reduction rates on survival and CVD events in patients undergoing each therapy (iHDF, pre/post-dilution online HDF). The number of planned subjects was 4,000 in preplanning. Data are collected using RED-Cap, which is an EDC system. A total of 9,930 patients were enrolled at the beginning of the study at 59 registered facilities. The JAMREDS observation period will continue until the end of 2023, after which the data will be cleaned and confirmed before analysis. CONCLUSION: This study may provide new evidence for the relationship between the amount of removed large-middle molecules (such as AMG) and the mortality and CVD risk. Comparisons with convection volumes will also be of interest.

Effect of a personalized nutritional intervention program on nutritional status, quality of life and mortality in hemodialysis patients / Efecto de un programa de intervención nutricional personalizado en el estado nutricional, calidad de vida y mortalidad en pacientes en hemodiálisis

Objective: dietary advice provided through a nutritional intervention program (NIP) is recommended by renal clinic guidelines to prevent or treat malnutrition, that could improve quality of life (QoL) and survival in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study set out to evaluate the effect of a personalized NIP on the nutritional status and its impact on QoL and mortality in dialyzed patients. Material and methods: this was a 12-month intervention study with regular follow-up in which nutritional parameters were measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. QoL was assessed by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life version 1.2 (KDQOL-SF) at baseline and at the end of the study. All dialyzed patients received individualized consultations with a trained dietitian. The content of the nutritional education program included a personalized meal plan and educational materials addressing nutrition to manage fluids, electrolytes, and vitamin D. Results: a total of 75 patients were included. After the NIP, visceral proteins, phosphorous, potassium and vitamin D levels had improved significantly (p < 0.001). The percentage of well-nourished patients increased by 30 % (p < 0.001). At the end of the study, the well-nourished patients had significantly improved scores on the general summary areas of the KDQOL-SF, reduced worry concerning fluid and dietary restrictions (p < 0.001), and the survival rate was 12 months longer (p < 0.01). Conclusion: the results of this study suggest that personalized NIP contributed to improved nutritional status, QoL and survival in HD patients. (AU)

Objetivo: el asesoramiento dietético proporcionado a través de un programa de intervención nutricional (PIN) es recomendado por las guías clínicas renales para prevenir o tratar la desnutrición, puediendo mejorar la calidad de vida (CV) y la supervivencia en pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de un PNI personalizado sobre el estado nutricional y su impacto en la calidad de vida y la mortalidad en pacientes dializados. Material y métodos: estudio de intervención de 12 meses de duración, con seguimiento periódico de los pacientes en el que se midieron los parámetros nutricionales al inicio, a los 6 y 12 meses. La CV fue evaluada por el cuestionario Kidney Disease Quality of Life versión 1.2 (KDQOL-SF) al inicio y al final del estudio. Todos los pacientes dializados recibieron consultas individualizadas con un dietista. El contenido del programa de educación nutricional incluyó un plan de alimentación personalizado y materiales educativos sobre nutrición para el manejo de fluidos, electrolitos y vitamina D. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 75 pacientes. Después del PIN, los niveles de proteínas viscerales, fósforo, potasio y vitamina D habían mejorado significativamente (p < 0,001). El porcentaje de pacientes bien nutridos aumentó un 30 % (p < 0,001). Al final del estudio, los pacientes bien nutridos mejoraron significativamente las puntuaciones en las áreas de resumen general del KDQOL-SF, redujeron la preocupación por las restricciones dietéticas y de líquidos (p < 0,001) y la tasa de supervivencia fue de 12 meses superior (p < 0,01). Conclusión: los resultados de este estudio sugieren que el PIN personalizado contribuyó a mejorar el estado nutricional, la calidad de vida y la supervivencia en pacientes en HD. (AU)

Estimating the association between systemic Interleukin-6 and mortality in the dialysis population. Re-analysis of the global fluid study, systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation, measured as circulating Interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease. However, this has not been convincingly demonstrated in a systematic review or a meta-analysis in the dialysis population. We provide such evidence, including a re-analysis of the GLOBAL Fluid Study. METHODS: Mortality in the GLOBAL fluid study was re-analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression with IL-6 levels as a covariate using a continuous non-logarithmic scale. Literature searches of the association of IL-6 levels with mortality were conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PyschINFO and CENTRAL. All studies were assessed for risk of bias using the QUIPS tool. To calculate a pooled effect size, studies were grouped by use of IL-6 scale and included in the meta-analysis if IL-6 was analysed as a continuous linear covariate, either per unit or per 10 pg/ml, in both unadjusted or adjusted for other patient characteristics (e.g. age, comorbidity) models. Funnel plot was used to identify potential publication bias. RESULTS: Of 1886 citations identified from the electronic search, 60 were included in the qualitative analyses, and 12 had sufficient information to proceed to meta-analysis after full paper screening. Random effects meta-analysis of 11 articles yielded a pooled hazard ratio (HR) per pg/ml of 1.03, (95% CI 1.01, 1.03), [Formula: see text]= 81%. When the analysis was confined to seven articles reporting a non-adjusted HR the result was similar: 1.03, per pg/ml (95% CI: 1.03, 1.06), [Formula: see text]=92%. Most of the heterogeneity could be attributed to three of the included studies. Publication bias could not be determined due to the limited number of studies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review confirms the adverse association between systemic IL-6 levels and survival in people treated with dialysis. The heterogeneity that we observed may reflect differences in study case mix. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO - CRD42020214198.

El acceso vascular en el paciente anciano en hemodiálisis: resultados y supervivencia / Vascular access in elderly hemodialysis patients: Results and surviva

Introducción: A pesar de los intentos de la iniciativa “fístula primero”, la realidad es que un porcentaje nada desdeñable de pacientes en hemodiálisis siguen dializándose a través de un catéter, y esto es especialmente relevante en los pacientes ancianos. Objetivos: Conocer y sintetizar la evidencia científica existente sobre los resultados del acceso vascular en el paciente anciano en hemodiálisis.Metodología: Se ha realizado una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus y WOS. Se utilizaron como descriptores los siguientes términos: Hemodiálisis (“Hemodialysis”), Acceso Vascular (“Vascular Access”) y Mortalidad (“Mortality”), combinándolos entre sí utilizando el operador booleano AND. Se incluyeron artículos cuya publicación estuviese comprendida entre 2017 y 2023 en inglés y español. Resultados: Se incluyeron 15 artículos: una revisión y diferentes estudios observacionales. Tras el análisis de estos, se ha evidenciado el incremento del uso de catéteres del paciente anciano, relacionándose con elevadas tasas de infecciones y peor supervivencia. El uso del catéter está relacionado con mayor comorbilidad y edad. Conclusión: La fístula arteriovenosa sigue siendo el acceso vascular de elección en todos los pacientes en hemodiálisis, sin embargo, el uso del catéter ha experimentado un aumento importante en los pacientes ancianos, debido posiblemente a menor esperanza de vida y comorbilidad asociada a estas personas. Este aumento de su utilización se ha relacionado con un aumento importante de la mortalidad. A pesar de ello, en el paciente mayor, no está claro si el aumento de la mortalidad se debe al catéter o a las características basales del paciente. (AU)

Introduction: Despite the efforts of the “fistula first” initiative, the reality is that a significant percentage of hemodialysis patients continue to receive dialysis through a catheter, and this is especially relevant in elderly patients. Objectives: To understand and synthesize the existing scientific evidence regarding vascular access outcomes in elderly hemodialysis patients.Methodology: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and WOS databases. The following terms were used as descriptors: “Hemodialysis”, “Vascular Access”, and “Mortality”, combined using the Boolean operator AND. Articles published between 2017 and 2023 in English and Spanish were included. Results: Fifteen articles were included: one review and various observational studies. Upon analysis, an increase in the use of catheters in elderly patients was observed, which was associated with high infection rates and worse survival outcomes. Catheter use was linked to higher comorbidity and older age.Conclusion: Arteriovenous fistula remains the preferred vascular access in all hemodialysis patients; however, the use of catheters has significantly increased in elderly patients, possibly due to lower life expectancy and associated comorbidities in this population. This increase in catheter utilization has been associated with a significant rise in mortality. Nevertheless, in older patients, it is not clear whether the increased mortality is attributable to the catheter itself or the baseline characteristics of the patient. (AU)

Vascular access type and mortality in elderly incident hemodialysis patients / Tipo de acceso vascular y mortalidad en pacientes ancianos en programa de hemodiálisis

Introduction: The ideal vascular access type for elderly hemodialysis (HD) patients remains debatable. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between patterns of vascular access use within the first year of HD and mortality in elderly patients. Methods: Single-center retrospective study of 99 incident HD patients aged≥80 years from January 2010 to May 2021. Patients were categorized according to their patterns of vascular access use within the first year of HD: central venous catheter (CVC) only, CVC to arteriovenous fistula (AVF), AVF to CVC, and AVF only. Baseline clinical data were compared among groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox's proportional hazards model. Results: When compared with CVC to AVF, mortality risk was significantly higher among CVC only patients and similar to AVF only group [HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.32–2.51)]. Ischemic heart disease [HR 1.74 (95% CI 1.02–2.96)], lower levels of albumin [HR 2.16 (95% CI 1.28–3.64)] and hemoglobin [HR 4.10(95% CI 1.69–9.92)], and higher levels of c-reactive protein [HR 1.87(95% CI 1.11–3.14)] were also associated with increased mortality risk in our cohort, p<0.05. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that placement of an AVF during the early stages of dialysis was associated with lower mortality compared to persistent CVC use among elderly patients. AVF placement appears to have a positive impact on survival outcomes, even in those who started dialysis with a CVC. (AU)

Introducción: El tipo de acceso vascular ideal para pacientes ancianos en hemodiálisis (HD) sigue siendo discutible. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la asociación entre los patrones de uso del acceso vascular en el primer año de HD y la mortalidad en pacientes ancianos. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico de 99 pacientes incidentes en HD con edades ≥80años desde enero de 2010 hasta mayo de 2021. Los pacientes fueron categorizados según sus patrones de uso del acceso vascular en el primer año de HD: catéter venoso central (CVC) solo, CVC a fístula arteriovenosa (FAV), FAV a CVC y FAV solamente. Los datos clínicos iniciales se compararon entre los grupos. Los resultados de supervivencia se analizaron mediante las curvas de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier y el modelo de riesgo proporcional de Cox. Resultados: En comparación con el CVC para la FAV, el riesgo de mortalidad fue significativamente mayor entre los pacientes que solo recibieron CVC y similar al grupo que solo utilizó FAV (HR: 0,93; IC95%: 0,32-2,51). Cardiopatía isquémica (HR: 1,74; IC95%: 1,02-2,96), niveles más bajos de albúmina (HR: 2,16; IC 95%: 1,28-3,64) y de hemoglobina (HR: 4,10; IC 95%: 1,69-9,92), y niveles más altos de proteína C reactiva (HR: 1,87; IC 95%: 1,11-3,14) también se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de mortalidad en nuestra cohorte (p<0,05). Conclusión: Nuestros hallazgos sugirieron que la colocación de una FAV durante las primeras etapas de la diálisis se asoció con una menor mortalidad en comparación con el uso persistente de CVC en pacientes ancianos. La colocación de una FAV parece tener un impacto positivo en los resultados de supervivencia, incluso en aquellos que comenzaron la diálisis con un CVC. (AU)

High facility-level serum potassium variability associated with mortality in hemodialysis patients: results from Chinese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

The role of facility-level serum potassium (sK+) variability (FL-SPV) in dialysis patients has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to evaluate the association between FL-SPV and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients using data from the China Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) 5. FL-SPV was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of baseline sK+ of all patients in each dialysis center. The mean and SD values of FL-SPV of all participants were calculated, and patients were divided into the high FL-SPV (>the mean value) and low FL-SPV (≤the mean value) groups. Totally, 1339 patients were included, with a mean FL-SPV of 0.800 mmol/L. Twenty-three centers with 656 patients were in the low FL-SPV group, and 22 centers with 683 patients were in the high FL-SPV group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that liver cirrhosis (OR = 4.682, 95% CI: 1.246-17.593), baseline sK+ (<3.5 vs. 3.5 ≤ sK+ < 5.5 mmol/L, OR = 2.394, 95% CI: 1.095-5.234; ≥5.5 vs. 3.5 ≤ sK+ < 5.5 mmol/L, OR = 1.451, 95% CI: 1.087-1.939), dialysis <3 times/week (OR = 1.472, 95% CI: 1.073-2.020), facility patients' number (OR = 1.088, 95% CI: 1.058-1.119), serum HCO3- level (OR = 0.952, 95% CI: 0.921-0.984), dialysis vintage (OR = 0.919, 95% CI: 0.888-0.950), other cardiovascular disease (OR = 0.508, 95% CI: 0.369-0.700), and using high-flux dialyzer (OR = 0.425, 95% CI: 0.250-0.724) were independently associated with high FL-SPV (all p < .05). After adjusting potential confounders, high FL-SPV was an independent risk factor for all-cause death (HR = 1.420, 95% CI: 1.044-1.933) and cardiovascular death (HR = 1.827, 95% CI: 1.188-2.810). Enhancing the management of sK+ of hemodialysis patients and reducing FL-SPV may improve patient survival.

Association between serum ß2-microglobulin levels and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in chinese patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between serum ß2-microglobulin (ß2M) levels and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) is inconclusive. Furthermore, no study has been performed in China on the significance of serum ß2M levels in MHD patients. Therefore, this study investigated the aforementioned association in MHD patients. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 521 MHD patients were followed at Dalian Municipal Central Hospital affiliated with Dalian University of Technology from December 2019 to December 2021. The serum ß2M levels were categorized into three tertiles, and the lowest tertile served as the reference group. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding patients with CVD at baseline. RESULTS: During the follow-up period of 21.4 ± 6.3 months, there were 106 all-cause deaths, of which 68 were caused by CVD. When excluding CVD patients at baseline, there were 66 incident CVEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the risk of all-cause and CVD mortality in the highest tertile of serum ß2M levels was significantly higher than that in the lowest tertile (P < 0.05), but not for the CVEs (P > 0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, serum ß2M levels were positively associated with the risk of all-cause (HR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.21-4.17) and CVD (HR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.19-5.43) mortality, and a linear trend was evident (P < 0.05). Besides, the results of sensitivity analysis were consistent with the main findings. However, we didn't observed the significant association between serum ß2M levels and CVEs (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The serum ß2M level may be a significant predictor of the risk of all-cause and CVD mortality in MHD patients. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Análisis de las complicaciones del acceso vascular en hemodiálisis. Una revisión sistemática / Analysis of complications of vascular access in hemodialysis: A systematic review

Introducción:El acceso vascular sigue siendo uno de los retos más importantes en todas las unidades de diálisis, por todas las complicaciones derivadas de su uso y el gran impacto en la mor-bimortalidad del enfermo renal. Los tres tipos de acceso vascu-lar más utilizados son la fístula arteriovenosa nativa, el injerto o fístula arteriovenosa protésica y el catéter venoso central. Objetivo: Analizar y evaluar la situación actual y la incidencia de las complicaciones relacionadas con los diferentes accesos vasculares en hemodiálisis. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS y SciELO. Se incluyeron todos los artículos originales de menos de 5 años de antigüe-dad en los que uno de sus objetivos fuera analizar la preva-lencia o incidencia de las complicaciones de cualquier acceso vascular en hemodiálisis en población adulta. Resultados: El número de artículos para el análisis fueron 15. De ellos, 14 fueron estudios observacionales y uno, un ensa-yo clínico multicéntrico. Se analizaron datos demográficos de los pacientes, la prevalencia de complicaciones entre todos los accesos vasculares y la incidencia de complicaciones se-gún fístula nativa/protésica/catéter venoso central.Conclusiones: La fístula arteriovenosa nativa es el acceso vas-cular de elección ya que tiene tasas de complicaciones muy bajas. De entre ellas, la trombosis, es la complicación con más incidencia. El uso de catéter venoso central todavía es muy habitual, pese a ser el acceso vascular que presenta mayores tasas de complicaciones como las infecciones y la bacteriemia, produciéndose en un 10%-17% de los pacientes portadores.(AU)

Introduction: Vascular access remains one of the most important challenges in all dialysis units due to the complications associated with its use and its significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of renal patients. The three most used types of vascular access are native arteriovenous fistula, graft or prosthetic arteriovenous fistula, and central venous catheter. Objective: To analyze and evaluate the current situation and incidence of complications related to different vascular accesses in hemodialysis. Methodology : A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and SciELO databases. All original articles published within the last 5 years that aimed to analyze the prevalence or incidence of complications related to any vascular access in hemodialysis in the adult population were included. Results: A total of 15 articles were included for analysis. Among them, 14 were observational studies, and one was a multicenter clinical trial. Demographic data of the patients, the prevalence of complications across all vascular accesses, and the incidence of complications for native fistula/prosthetic fistula/central venous catheter were analyzed. Conclusions: Native arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access due to its very low complication rates. Among the complications, thrombosis has the highest incidence. The use of central venous catheters is still common, despite having higher rates of complications such as infections and bacteremia, occurring in 10%-17% of the patients.(AU)

Medium Cut-Off versus Low-Flux Dialyzers in Hemodialysis Patients with COVID-19: Clinical Outcomes and Reduction in Interleukin-6.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused extensive morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hemodialysis (HD) patients are both vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and tend to suffer greater disease severity and mortality. This retrospective study aimed to compare medium cut-off (MCO) and low-flux (LF) membrane dialyzers in terms of interleukin-6 (IL-6) reduction, change in inflammatory state, intradialytic complications, and mortality in chronic HD patients with COVID-19. METHOD: HD patients with a confirmed COVID-19 infection were admitted to the hospital for 10-14 days and underwent HD at the COVID-HD unit. Choice of dialyzer membrane used (MCO vs. LF) depended on the primary nephrologist(s). We collected data on demographics, baseline characteristics, laboratory results, diagnosis, treatments, HD prescription, hemodynamic status during HD, and mortality at 14 and 28 days after. RESULTS: IL-6 reduction ratio (RR) in the MCO group was 9.7 (interquartile range, 71.1) percent, which was significantly higher than that of the LF group (RR, -45.7 [interquartile range, 70.2] percent). The incidence rate of intradialytic hypotension in the MCO group was 3.846 events per 100 dialysis hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.954-6.856), which was significantly lower than that of the LF group (9.057; 95% CI, 5.592-13.170). Overall, mortality was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The MCO membrane was more effective in removing IL-6 and was better tolerated than the LF membrane. Large, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the relative benefits of the MCO membrane, especially mortality. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our results suggest that the MCO membrane may be beneficial in chronic HD patients with COVID-19.

Association of Four Types of Vascular Access Including Arterial Superficialization with Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular access usage varies widely across countries. Previous studies have evaluated the association of clinical outcomes with the three types of vascular access, namely, arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG), and tunneled and cuffed central venous catheter (TC-CVC). However, little is known regarding the association between arterial superficialization (AS) and the mortality of patients. METHODS: A nationwide cohort study was conducted using data from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry (2006-2007). We included patients aged ≥20 years undergoing hemodialysis with a dialysis vintage ≥6 months. The exposures of interest were the four types of vascular access: AVF, AVG, AS, and TC-CVC. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the associations of vascular access types with 1-year all-cause and cause-specific mortality. RESULTS: A total of 183,490 maintenance hemodialysis patients were included: 90.7% with AVF, 6.9% with AVG, 2.0% with AS, and 0.4% with TC-CVC. During the 1-year follow-up period, 13,798 patients died. Compared to patients with AVF, those with AVG, AS, and TC-CVC had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality after adjustment for confounding factors: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) - 1.30 (1.20-1.41), 1.56 (1.39-1.76), and 2.15 (1.77-2.61), respectively. Similar results were obtained for infection-related and cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: This nationwide cohort study conducted in Japan suggested that AVF usage may have the lowest risk of all-cause mortality. The study also suggested that the usage of AS may be associated with better survival rates compared to those of TC-CVC in patients who are not suitable for AVF or AVG.

A new approach to predicting mortality in dialysis patients using sociodemographic features based on artificial intelligence.

One of the main problems that affect patients in dialysis therapy who are on the waiting list to receive a kidney transplant is predicting their survival time if they do not receive a transplant. This paper proposes a new approach to survival prediction based on artificial intelligence techniques combined with statistical methods to study the association between sociodemographic factors and patient survival on the waiting list if they do not receive a kidney transplant. This new approach consists of a first stage that uses the clustering techniques that are best suited to the data structure (K-Means, Mini Batch K-Means, Agglomerative Clustering and K-Modes) used to identify the risk profile of dialysis patients. Later, a new method called False Clustering Discovery Reduction is performed to determine the minimum number of populations to be studied, and whose mortality risk is statistically differentiable. This approach was applied to the OPTN medical dataset (n = 44,663). The procedure started from 11 initial clusters obtained with the Agglomerative technique, and was reduced to eight final risk populations, for which their Kaplan-Meier survival curves were provided. With this result, it is possible to make predictions regarding the survival time of a new patient who enters the waiting list if the sociodemographic profile of the patient is known. To do so, the predictive algorithm XGBoost is used, which allows the cluster to which it belongs to be predicted and the corresponding Kaplan-Meier curve to be associated with it. This prediction process is achieved with an overall Multi-class AUC of 99.08 %.

Sex disparities in mortality among patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis.

Females are known to have a better survival rate than males in the general population, but previous studies have shown that this superior survival is diminished in patients on dialysis. This study aimed to investigate the risk of mortality in relation to sex among Korean patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). A total of 4994 patients with kidney failure who were receiving dialysis were included for a prospective nationwide cohort study. Cox multivariate proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between sex and the risk of cause-specific mortality according to dialysis modality. During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the death rate per 100 person-years was 6.4 and 8.3 in females and males, respectively. The female-to-male mortality rate in patients on dialysis was 0.77, compared to 0.85 in the general population. In adjusted analyses, the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower for females than males in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.87, P < 0.001). No significant differences in the risk of cardiovascular and infection-related deaths were observed according to sex. The risk of mortality due to sudden death, cancer, other, or unknown causes was significantly lower for females than males in the entire population (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.78, P < 0.001), in patients on HD (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90, P = 0.003), and in patients on PD (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.70, P < 0.001). The survival advantage of females in the general population was maintained in Korean dialysis patients, which was attributed to a lower risk of noncardiovascular and noninfectious death.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00931970.

Diabetes acts on mortality in hemodialysis patients predicted by asymmetric dimethylarginine and inflammation.

BACKGROUND: The mortality rate of diabetic patients on dialysis is higher than that of non-diabetic patients. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and inflammation are strong predictors of death in hemodialysis. This study aimed to evaluate asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein interaction in predicting mortality in hemodialysis according to the presence or absence of diabetes. METHODS: Asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein were measured in 202 patients in maintenance hemodialysis assembled from 2011 to 2012 and followed for four years. Effect modification of C-reactive protein on the relationship between asymmetric dimethylarginine and all-cause mortality was investigated dividing the population into four categories according to the median of asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein levels were similar between diabetics and non-diabetics. Asymmetric dimethylarginine - median IQR µM - (1.95 1.75-2.54 versus 1.03 0.81-1.55 P=0.000) differed in non-diabetics with or without evolution to death (HR 2379 CI 1.36-3.68 P=0.000) and was similar in diabetics without or with evolution to death. Among non-diabetics, the category with higher asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein levels exhibited the highest mortality (69.0% P=0.000). No differences in mortality were seen in diabetics. A joint effect was found between asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein, explaining all-cause mortality (HR 15.21 CI 3.50-66.12 P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric dimethylarginine is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in non-diabetic patients in hemodialysis. Other risk factors may overlap asymmetric dimethylarginine in people with diabetes. Inflammation dramatically increases the risk of death associated with high plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine in hemodialysis.