Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 125
Filter
1.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 51(2): 397-404, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777491

ABSTRACT

The United States has a longstanding history of using laws to define the scope of government involvement in controlling personal matters related to sex and sexuality. Although the government serves a valuable role in protecting and promoting public health, sexual and reproductive health is unduly impacted by social stigma in ways that other fields of medicine are not. Consequently, this care is often singled out by legislation that limits rather than protects this care. Health care professionals are uniquely positioned to advocate for legal protection of the patient-provider relationship and for access to essential health care, including abortion, contraception, and gender-affirming care.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Health , Sexual Health , Humans , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , United States , Health Services Accessibility , Social Stigma , Male , Pregnancy , Contraception
3.
JAMA ; 328(17): 1703-1704, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318125

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint proposes a solution to better safeguard reproductive health information in patient records that are now more complete owing to the interoperability of health information exchange networks.


Subject(s)
Health Information Interoperability , Reproductive Health , Supreme Court Decisions , Electronic Health Records , Reproduction , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Health/standards , Reproductive Health/trends , United States , Health Information Interoperability/standards , Health Information Interoperability/trends , Quality of Health Care/trends
5.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 157(1): 210-215, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35187657

ABSTRACT

International migration puts people's sexual and reproductive health (SRH), particularly those of women and children, at increased risk. However, many international migrants are denied access to timely and adequate SRH information, goods, and services by governments and/or service providers. This article reviews relevant international human rights treaties to argue that the barriers faced by migrants in accessing SRH care constitute violations of international law. It is well established that migrants are guaranteed access to SRH care as a part of their right to health, as well as the rights enjoyed by vulnerable populations. Increasingly, hindrance of migrants' access to SRH care is also recognized as a threat to their rights to life and equality with non-migrants. The case of Toussaint v Canada illustrates how governments may be held accountable by human rights treaty monitoring bodies when they fail to respect and fulfill migrants' right to SRH care.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Human Rights , International Cooperation , Reproductive Health , Sexual Health , Transients and Migrants , Child , Emigration and Immigration/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , International Cooperation/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Sexual Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Control, Formal , Transients and Migrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Vulnerable Populations/legislation & jurisprudence
8.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250976, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33914834

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Sustainable Development Goals, which are grounded in human rights, involve empowering women and girls and ensuring that everyone can access sexual and reproductive health and rights (Goal 5). This is the first systematic review reporting interventions involving rights-based approaches for sexual and reproductive health issues including gender-based violence, maternity, HIV and sexually transmitted infections in low and middle-income countries. AIMS: To describe the evidence on rights-based approaches to sexual and reproductive health in low and middle-income countries. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched until 9/1/2020. Inclusion criteria were: Study design: any interventional study.Population: females aged over 15 living in low and middle-income countries.Intervention: a "rights-based approach" (defined by the author) and/or interventions that the author explicitly stated related to "rights".Comparator: clusters in which no intervention or fewer components of an intervention were in place, or individuals not exposed to interventions, or exposed to fewer intervention components.Outcome: Sexual and reproductive health related outcomes. A narrative synthesis of included studies was undertaken, and outcomes mapped to identify evidence gaps. The systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019158950). RESULTS: Database searching identified 17,212 records, and 13,404 studies remained after de-duplication. Twenty-four studies were included after title and abstract, full-text and reference-list screening by two authors independently. Rights-based interventions were effective for some included outcomes, but evidence was of poor quality. Testing uptake for HIV and/or other sexually transmitted infections, condom use, and awareness of rights improved with intervention, but all relevant studies were at high, critical or serious risk of bias. No study included gender-based violence outcomes. CONCLUSION: Considerable risk of bias in all studies means results must be interpreted with caution. High-quality controlled studies are needed urgently in this area.


Subject(s)
Gender-Based Violence/prevention & control , Health Promotion/methods , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Developing Countries , Female , Human Rights , Humans , Pregnancy , Reproductive Health Services , Sexual Behavior , Young Adult
9.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 48(1): 11-29, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33573782

ABSTRACT

Reproductive health care is crucial to women's well-being and that of their families. State and federal laws restricting access to contraception and abortion in the United States are proliferating. Often the given rationales for these laws state or imply that access to contraception and abortion promote promiscuity, and/or that abortion is medically dangerous and causes a variety of adverse obstetric, medical, and psychological sequelae. These rationales lack scientific foundation. This article provides the evidence for the safety of abortion, for both women and girls, and encourages readers to advocate against restrictions.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Reproductive Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Women's Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Induced/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Contraception , Female , Gynecology , Humans , Obstetrics , Pregnancy , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
11.
Int J Equity Health ; 19(1): 111, 2020 07 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32635915

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses a critical concern in realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights through policies and programs - the relationship between power and accountability. We examine accountability strategies for sexual and reproductive health and rights through the lens of power so that we might better understand and assess their actual working. Power often derives from deep structural inequalities, but also seeps into norms and beliefs, into what we 'know' as truth, and what we believe about the world and about ourselves within it. Power legitimizes hierarchy and authority, and manufactures consent. Its capillary action causes it to spread into every corner and social extremity, but also sets up the possibility of challenge and contestation.Using illustrative examples, we show that in some contexts accountability strategies may confront and transform adverse power relationships. In other contexts, power relations may be more resistant to change, giving rise to contestation, accommodation, negotiation or even subversion of the goals of accountability strategies. This raises an important question about measurement. How is one to assess the achievements of accountability strategies, given the shifting sands on which they are implemented?We argue that power-focused realist evaluations are needed that address four sets of questions about: i) the dimensions and sources of power that an accountability strategy confronts; ii) how power is built into the artefacts of the strategy - its objectives, rules, procedures, financing methods inter alia; iii) what incentives, disincentives and norms for behavior are set up by the interplay of the above; and iv) their consequences for the outcomes of the accountability strategy. We illustrate this approach through examples of performance, social and legal accountability strategies.


Subject(s)
Health Equity/ethics , Health Equity/standards , Reproductive Health/ethics , Reproductive Health/standards , Sexual Health/ethics , Sexual Health/standards , Social Responsibility , Adult , Female , Health Equity/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Sexual Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Young Adult
12.
Rev. bioét. derecho ; (49): 59-75, jul. 2020.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-192094

ABSTRACT

Este artículo describe el discurso de actores relevantes sobre la noción y argumentos de la objeción de conciencia en el contexto del aborto en Chile. Los resultados dan cuenta de la complejidad para abordar esta temática. Hay actores que consideran la objeción de conciencia un derecho fundamental. Para otros, constituye un privilegio y una manifestación de desigualdad ante la ley. Los principales argumentos aluden a la libertad de conciencia y religión. Se considera contrastar la objeción de conciencia con el compromiso de conciencia, debiendo incorporarse la reflexión ética en la formación y capacitación de los equipos de salud. Deben generarse instancias de fiscalización y regulación, evitando vulnerar los derechos de las mujeres que puedan resultar afectadas por esta objeción


This article describes the discourse of relevant actors on the notion and arguments of conscientious objection to abortion in Chile. The results show the complexity of addressing this issue. There are actors who consider conscientious objection a fundamental right. For others, it constitutes a privilege and a manifestation of legal inequality. The main arguments refer to freedom of conscience and religion. It is considered to contrast conscientious objection with conscientious commitment, and ethical reflection should be incorporated into the education and training of health teams. Monitoring and regulatory instances must be created to avoid violating the rights of women who may be affected by this objection


Aquest article descriu el discurs d'actors rellevants sobre la noció I arguments de l'objecció de consciència en el context de l'avortament a Xile. Els resultats evidencien la complexitat per abordar aquesta temàtica. Hi ha actors que consideren l'objecció de consciència un dret fonamental. Per altres, constitueix un privilegi I una manifestació de desigualtat davant la llei. Els principals arguments al·ludeixen a la llibertat de consciència I religió. Es considera contrastar l'objecció de consciència amb el compromís de consciència, I s'ha d'incorporar la reflexió ètica a la formació I capacitació dels equips de salut. S'han de generar instàncies de fiscalització I regulació, evitant vulnerar els drets de les dones que puguin resultar afectades per aquesta objecció


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Abortion , Women's Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Conscience , Reproductive Health/ethics , Sexual Health/ethics , Chile , Women's Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Sexual Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics, Medical
13.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 25(4): 311-313, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32567960

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to reviews the history of China's population policy since 2011, and draw lessons from the Chinese experience in response to infertility. METHODS: Data from the Chinese infertility status survey report (2009) and national statistical yearbooks (2009-2019) are used to assess the severity of infertility and reproductive centers shortage in China. Lessons from China was informed by a review of existing literature. RESULTS: The proportion of couples suffering from infertility in China increased to 12.5% (166.8 million in 2009) from just 6.89% (86.6 million in 1988) two decades earlier, while the number of reproductive centers was one for every 3.1 million citizens. The total costs per live birth for medically assisted reproduction in Chinese public fertility clinics was 30,000 yuan in 2012. Among infertile couples, unemployed patients accounted for the largest proportion (21.9% in 2014). Currently in China, health regulations permit oocyte donation only from infertility patients who have 20 or more mature oocytes, of which at least 15 must be kept for their own treatment. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to integrate the reproductive health care of infertile people into the national public health service. In addition to relieving their economic burden, national policies should guide and support enterprises to guarantee employee medical leave for infertility. Growing numbers of bereaved older women who have lost their only child make it imperative to reconsider liberalizing the regulation of oocyte donation in China.


Subject(s)
Family Planning Policy , Infertility/epidemiology , Reproductive Health Services/trends , Reproductive Health/trends , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Asian People/history , Asian People/statistics & numerical data , China/epidemiology , Family Planning Policy/history , Female , Fertility Clinics/history , Fertility Clinics/legislation & jurisprudence , Fertility Clinics/statistics & numerical data , History, 21st Century , Humans , Infertility/ethnology , Infertility/history , Male , Oocyte Donation/history , Oocyte Donation/legislation & jurisprudence , Oocyte Donation/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Reproductive Health/history , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Health Services/history , Reproductive Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/history , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence
14.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0228142, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31971983

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of clinical providers and mothers on young women's ability to have confidential, candid reproductive health conversations with their providers. METHODS: We conducted 14 focus groups with 48 women aged 15-28 years (n = 9), and 32 reproductive healthcare workers (n = 5). Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analyzed using inductive coding and thematic analyses. We examined findings through the lens of paternalism, a theory that illustrates adults' role in children's autonomy and wellbeing. RESULTS: Mothers have a substantial impact on young women's health values, knowledge, and empowerment. Young women reported bringing information from their mothers into patient-provider health discussions. Clinical best practices included intermingled components of office policies, state laws, and clinical guidelines, which supported health workers' actions to have confidential conversations. There were variations in how health workers engaged young women in a confidential conversation within the exam room. CONCLUSIONS: Both young women and health workers benefit from situations in which health workers firmly ask the parent to leave the exam room for a private conversation with the patient. Young women reported this improves their comfort in asking the questions they need to make the best decision for themselves. Clinic leadership needs to ensure that confidentiality surrounding young women's reproductive health is uniform throughout their practice and integrated into patient flow.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Mothers , Reproductive Health/statistics & numerical data , Women's Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Communication , Confidentiality , Female , Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Privacy , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Women's Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Young Adult
15.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0227216, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31914156

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Mifepristone was approved for use in medical abortion by Health Canada in 2015. Approval was accompanied by regulations that prohibited pharmacist dispensing of the medication. Reproductive health advocates in Canada recognized this regulation would limit access to medical abortion and successfully worked to have this regulation removed in 2017. The purpose of this study was to assess the leadership involved in changing these regulations so that the success may be replicated by other groups advocating for health policy change. METHODS: This study involved a mixed methods instrumental design in the context of British Columbia, Canada. Our data collection included: a) interviews with seven key individuals, representing the organizations that worked in concert for change to Canadian mifepristone regulations, and b) document analysis of press articles, correspondence, briefing notes, and meeting minutes. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts of audio-recorded interviews. We identified strengths and weaknesses of the team dynamic using the Develop Coalitions, Achieve Results and Systems Transformation domains of the LEADS Framework. RESULTS: Our analysis of participant interviews indicates that autonomy, shared values, and clarity in communication were integral to the success of the group's work. Analysis using the LEADS Framework showed that individuals possessed many of the capabilities identified as being necessary for successful health policy leadership. A lack of post-project assessment was identified as a possible limitation and could be incorporated in future work to strengthen dynamics especially when a desired outcome is not achieved. Document analysis provided a clear time-line of the work completed and suggested that strong communication between team members was another key to success. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our analysis of the interviews and documents provide valuable insight into the workings of a successful group committed to a common goal. The existing collegial and trusting relationships between key stakeholders allowed for interdisciplinary collaboration, rapid mobilization, and identification of issues that facilitated successful Canadian global-first deregulation of mifepristone dispensing.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal , Abortion, Induced , Mifepristone , Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal/supply & distribution , Abortion, Induced/legislation & jurisprudence , British Columbia , Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Health Policy , Humans , Leadership , Mifepristone/supply & distribution , Pregnancy , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33561057

ABSTRACT

Aim: To present a protocol study directed at tackling gender discrimination against Roma girls by empowering their mattering so they can envision their own futures and choose motherhood only if-and when-they are ready. Background: Motherhood among Roma girls (RGM) in Europe impoverishes their lives, puts them at risk of poor physical and mental health and precipitates school dropouts. Overwhelming evidence affirms that the conditions of poverty and the social exclusionary processes they suffer have a very important explanatory weight in their sexual and reproductive decisions. Methods: Through a Community-based Participatory Action Research design, 20-25 Roma girls will be recruited in each one of the four impoverished communities in Bulgaria, Romania and Spain. Data collection and analysis: Desk review about scientific evidences and policies will be carried out to frame the problem. Narratives of Roma women as well as baseline and end line interviews of girl participants will be collected through both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Quantitative data will be gathered through reliable scales of mattering, socio-political agency, satisfaction with life and self. A narrative analysis of the qualitative information generated in the interviews will be carried out. Expected results: (1) uncover contextual and psychosocial patterns of girl-motherhood among Roma women; (2) build critical thinking among Roma girls to actively participate in all decisions affecting them and advocate for their own gender rights within their communities; and (3) empower Roma girls and their significant adults to critically evaluate their own initiatives and provide feedback to their relevant stakeholders. Conclusions: Roma girls will improve their educational aspirations and achievements and their social status while respecting and enhancing Roma values.


Subject(s)
Power, Psychological , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Rights , Roma/psychology , Social Justice , Adult , Community-Based Participatory Research , Ethnicity/psychology , Europe , Female , Health Equity , Health Promotion/methods , Health Services Research , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Social Stigma
18.
Malar J ; 18(1): 372, 2019 Nov 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31752868

ABSTRACT

Malaria in pregnancy (MiP) contributes to devastating maternal and neonatal outcomes. Coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) remains alarmingly low. Data was compiled from MiP programme reviews and performed a literature search on access to and determinants of IPTp. National malaria control and reproductive health (RH) policies may be discordant. Integration may improve coverage. Medication stock-outs are a persistent problem. Quality improvement programmes are often not standardized. Capacity building varies across countries. Community engagement efforts primarily focus on promotion of services. The majority of challenges can be addressed at country level to improve IPTp coverage.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Malaria/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Antimalarials/supply & distribution , Capacity Building/statistics & numerical data , Communicable Disease Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Community Participation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Pregnancy , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Young Adult
19.
Sex Reprod Health Matters ; 27(2): 1669338, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609191

ABSTRACT

This article discusses political setbacks related to sexual and reproductive health and rights that have occurred in Brazil in the last 5 years (2014-2018) resulting from the significant role played by Christian (Evangelical and Catholic) parliamentarians in the legislative branch. Political initiatives aimed at prohibiting the affirmation of sexual and reproductive rights, while also curtailing debate about sexuality and gender in schools and universities, have raised "moral panic" within some elements of Brazilian society. The discursive strategies used around so-called "gender ideology" stimulated the formation of civil organisations which promote morality based on right-wing political positions. For this study, we looked at official documents and bibliographic material to examine how issues related to abortion rights, health care in cases of sexual violence, the prevention of sexually transmitted infections and homosexual citizenship are currently being suppressed, compromising the defence and advancement of the sexual and reproductive rights of women and the LGBTI+ population. The results point to the steady weakening of public policies that had become law in the 1980s, a time of Brazilian re-democratisation after two decades of military dictatorship. A wide range of civil, political and social rights, which saw significant growth and consolidation over the last 20 years, were rolled back after the resurgence of the extreme right wing in the federal legislature, culminating in the election of the current president in October 2018. However, social movements have increased in strength in the last few decades, especially the black feminist and LGBTI+ rights movements. These movements continue to provide political resistance, striving to affirm and protect all sexual and reproductive rights achieved to date.


Subject(s)
Catholicism/psychology , Morals , Politics , Reproductive Health/ethics , Reproductive Rights/ethics , Reproductive Rights/psychology , Sexuality/psychology , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Rights/legislation & jurisprudence
20.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0223455, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31596892

ABSTRACT

Nigeria has a plural legal system in which various sources of law govern simultaneously. Inconsistent and conflicting legal frameworks can reinforce pre-existing health disparities in sexual and reproductive health (SRH). While previous studies indicate poor SRH outcomes for Nigerian women and girls, particularly in Northern states, the relationship between customary and religious law (CRL) and SRH has not been explored. We conducted a state-level ecological study to examine the relationship between CRL and SRH outcomes among women in 36 Nigerian states and the Federal Capital Territory of Abuja (n = 37), using publicly available Demographic and Health Survey data from 2013. Indicators were guided by published research and included contraception use among married women, total fertility rate, median age at first birth, receipt of antenatal care, delivery location, and comprehensive knowledge of HIV. To account for economic differences between states, crude linear regression models were compared to a multivariable model, adjusting for per capita GDP. All SRH outcomes, except comprehensive knowledge of HIV, were statistically significantly more negative in CRL states compared to non-CRL states, even after accounting for state-level GDP. In CRL states in 2013, compared to non-CRL states, the proportion of married women who used any method of contraception was 22.7 percentage points lower ([95% CI: -15.78 --29.64], p<0.001), a difference that persisted in a model adjusting for per capita GDP (b[adj] = -16.15, 95% CI: [-8.64 --23.66], p<0.001.). While this analysis of retrospective state-level data found robust associations between CRL and poor SRH outcomes, future research should incorporate prospective individual-level data to further elucidate these findings.


Subject(s)
Human Rights , Religion , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Sexual Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Contraception/psychology , Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Cultural Characteristics , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Nigeria , Reproductive Health/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Health/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...