Genito-urinary infectious adverse events related to sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

INTRODUCTION: Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are an emerging class of drugs with wide indications. Controversial evidence exists regarding the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and genital infections (GI) with SGLT2is paving way for undertaking this network meta-analysis and meta-regression study. METHODS: Data from randomized trials evaluating SGLT2is reporting the number of patients with UTI and GI were included. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were the effect estimates. Meta-regression analysis identified risk factors. Number needed to harm (NNH) was estimated. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four articles were included [UTI (213 studies; 150,140 participants) and GI (188 studies; 121,275 participants)]. An increased risk of UTI (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.16) and GI (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 3.1, 3.9) was observed. Men showed a lower risk of UTI (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.3) and GI (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.5). Meta-regression analyses revealed BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and duration of SGLT2i treatment for ≥6 months as risk factors. NNH was 16 for UTI and 25 for GI. CONCLUSION: SGLT2is increase the risk of UTI and GI that needs to be incorporated in the treatment guidelines with precautions in high-risk patients. PROSPECTIVE PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/5fwyk.

Comparative Genitourinary Safety of In-class Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors among Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The American Heart Association recommended sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, little is known about their real-world in-class comparative safety in patients with HFpEF. We aimed to assess the comparative safety of SGLT2i in the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome among patients with HFpEF. METHODS: This cohort study using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare supplemental databases (2012-2020) included patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of HFpEF who initiated SGLT2i therapy. Three pairwise comparison groups were established: cohort 1, dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin; cohort 2, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin; and cohort 3, dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the risk of UTI or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome in each cohort. RESULTS: The risk of the composite outcome did not significantly differ between canagliflozin and dapagliflozin (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-1.14) or between empagliflozin and canagliflozin (aHR 1.25; 95% CI 0.77-2.05). Similarly, there was no evidence of difference between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in this risk (aHR 0.76; 95% CI 0.48-1.21). The results of analyses separately assessing UTI or genital infection were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the risk of UTI or genital infection among patients with HFpEF who initiated canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are used for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). It is important to assess their comparative risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection among patients with HFpEF. We compared patients with HFpEF using SGLT2i in three pairwise groups: cohort 1, dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin; cohort 2, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin; and cohort 3, dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. We found that there was no significant difference in the risk of genitourinary infections including UTI or genital infections among dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin.

A multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study evaluating the safety of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice in China (DONATE).

BACKGROUND: There are few large-scale studies evaluating the safety of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin, in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. DONATE, a multicentre, single-arm, prospective, non-interventional study, is the first real-world study evaluating the safety of dapagliflozin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Between August 2017 and July 2020, patients with type 2 diabetes who had initiated dapagliflozin therapy and received ≥1 dose were prospectively recruited from 88 hospitals in China. Patients were subsequently followed up for 24 weeks; if patients discontinued dapagliflozin they were followed up for an additional 7 days after treatment discontinuation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with adverse events and serious adverse events, particularly key adverse events of special interest (AESI) including urinary tract infection, genital tract infection (typical symptoms with or without microbiological diagnosis) and hypoglycaemia (typical symptoms with or without blood glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L, or blood glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L without symptoms). Exploratory outcomes included the absolute change in metabolic parameters and the proportion of patients with other AESI including volume depletion, abnormal blood electrolytes, polyuria, renal impairment, diabetic ketoacidosis, hepatic impairment and haematuria. RESULTS: A total of 3000 patients were enrolled, of whom 2990 (99.7%) were included in the safety analysis set. Mean (SD) age was 52.6 (12.0) years, and 65.8% of patients were male. Mean (SD) duration of type 2 diabetes at enrolment was 8.4 (7.1) years. Mean (SD) treatment duration of dapagliflozin was 209.1 (157.6) days. Adverse events were reported in 35.4% (n = 1059) of patients during the 24-week follow-up period. Overall, 9.0% (n = 268) were related to treatment and 6.2% (n = 186) were serious. Urinary tract infection, genital tract infection and hypoglycaemia were reported in 2.3% (n = 70), 1.3% (n = 39) and 1.1% (n = 32) of patients, respectively. The proportion of patients with other AESI was also low: polyuria (0.7%; n = 21), volume depletion (0.3%; n = 9), renal impairment (0.3%; n = 8), hepatic impairment (0.2%; n = 7), haematuria (0.2%; n = 6) and diabetic ketoacidosis (0.1%; n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that once-daily dapagliflozin was well tolerated in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and the overall safety profile of dapagliflozin in clinical practice in China was consistent with that reported in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03156985. Registered on 16 May, 2017.

Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy with SGLT-2 Inhibitor, DPP-4 Inhibitor, and Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Type 2 diabetes poses significant pain, economic burden, and health risks. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with SGLT-2 inhibitor add-on to DPP-4 inhibitor plus metformin for type 2 diabetes treatment. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of triple therapy (SGLT-2 inhibitor + DPP-4 inhibitor + metformin) compared to dual therapy (DPP-4 inhibitor + metformin) in type 2 diabetes. The search covered the period from inception to December 2018. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of eight randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that compared to dual therapy with DPP-4 inhibitor add-on to metformin, triple therapy with SGLT-2 inhibitor add-on to DPP-4 inhibitor plus metformin was associated with greater reductions in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, body weight, and blood pressure (P < .05). However, the risk of genital tract infection was higher in the triple therapy group (OR = 4.43, 95% CI (2.26, 8.70), P < .0001), while there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events, hypoglycemia episodes, urinary tract infection, and fractures between the two groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Based on current evidence, triple therapy was found to significantly improve blood glucose, body weight, and blood pressure when compared to dual therapy. Safety indicators did not show significant differences, except for an increased risk of genital tract infection.

Five comparative cohorts to assess the risk of genital tract infections associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors initiation in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: To assess the association between SGLT-2 inhibitors initiation and genital tract infections (GTIs) among patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A population-based cohort study using administrative healthcare data from Alberta, Canada, and primary care data from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Among new metformin users, we identified new users of SGLT-2 inhibitors and five active comparator cohorts (new users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sulfonylureas (SU), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), thiazolidinediones (TZD) and insulin). The outcome of interest was a composite GTI outcome. In each cohort, we used high-dimensional propensity score matching to adjust for confounding and conditional Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard ratios (HR). We used random-effects meta-analysis to combine aggregate data across databases. RESULTS: The risk of GTI was higher for SGLT-2 inhibitors users compared with DPP4inhibitor users (pooled HR 2.68, 95% CI 2.19 3.28), SU users (3.29, 2.62-4.13), GLP1-RA users (2.51, 1.90-3.31), TZD users (4.17, 2.46-7.08) and insulin users (1.86, 1.27-2.73). CONCLUSION: In five comparative cohorts, SGLT-2 inhibitors initiation is associated with a higher risk of GTIs. These findings from real-world data are consistent with placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials.

Polypharmacology of clinical sodium glucose co-transport protein 2 inhibitors and relationship to suspected adverse drug reactions.

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a promising second-line treatment strategy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with a developing landscape of both beneficial cardio- and nephroprotective properties and emerging adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), genetic mycotic infections, and amputations among others. A national register study (MHRA Yellow Card, UK) was used to quantify the SGLT2i's suspected ADRs relative to their Rx rate (OpenPrescribing, UK). The polypharmacology profiles of SGLT2i were data-mined (ChEMBL) for the first time. The ADR reports (n = 3629) and prescribing numbers (Rx n = 5,813,325) for each SGLT2i in the United Kingdom (from launch date to the beginning December 2019) were determined. Empagliflozin possesses the most selective SGLT2/SGLT1 inhibition profile at ~2500-fold, ~10-fold more selective than cangliflozin (~260-fold). Canagliflozin was found to also inhibit CYP at clinically achievable concentrations. We find that for overall ADR rates, empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin and empagliflozin versus canagliflozin are statistically significant (χ2 , p < .05), while dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin is not. In terms of overall ADRs, there is a greater relative rate for canagliflozin > dapagliflozin > empagliflozin. For fatalities, there is a greater relative rate for dapagliflozin > canagliflozin > empagliflozin. An organ classification that resulted in a statistically significant difference between SGLT2i was suspected infection/infestation ADRs between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin. Our findings at this stage of SGLT2i usage in the United Kingdom suggest that empagliflozin, the most selective SGLT2i, had the lowest suspected ADR incident rate (relative to prescribing) and in all reported classes of ADRs identified including infections, amputations, and DKA.

Clinical Adverse Events Associated with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis Involving 10 Randomized Clinical Trials and 71 553 Individuals.

CONTEXT: SGLT2is are first-line antidiabetic agents with demonstrated cardiovascular benefits. Prior meta-analyses have examined adverse events (AEs) associated with these drugs in general, but such knowledge needs to be updated with the results of more recent trials. In addition, the occurrence of various AEs with different underlying diseases is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the occurrence of various AEs associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and to examine the level of risk of AEs in patients with different underlying diseases. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane library on January 31, 2021. Outcomes of interest included 4 overall safety outcomes (AEs) and 12 specified safety outcomes. Further analyses were performed on various subgroups, which were defined based on the status of diabetes mellitus (DM), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure, and by the dosage of SGLT2i (high dose vs low dose). RESULTS: Our analysis included 10 eligible studies with a total of 71 553 participants. The meta-analysis showed that SGLT2i led to increased risks of genital infection (risk ratio [RR] 3.56, 95% CI 2.84-4.46), urinary tract infection (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12), diabetic ketoacidosis (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.36-3.63), and volume depletion (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.23). However, the use of SGLT2i was associated with reduced risks of any serious AE (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.94), acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91), and hyperkalemia (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.99). Within the different subgroups, the risk of amputation was higher in patients with ASCVD than in those without (RR 1.44 vs 0.96, P = .066). CONCLUSION: The use of SGLT2is is generally safe. SGLT2is may be associated with increased risks of genital infection but are protective against AKI. Of note, the risk of amputation was higher in patients with ASCVD. The key to the safe use of SGLT2is lies in the identification of high-risk populations and close surveillance of patients after treatment.

Estimation of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor-related genital and urinary tract infections via electronic medical record-based common data model.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: In Korea, the side effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have not been clearly reported, aside from voluntary reporting. We aimed to develop detection algorithms for SGLT2i-related genital tract infections (GTIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) via a common data model (CDM), an electronic medical record-based database for supporting multi-hospital clinical research. We estimated the occurrence of GTIs and UTIs and-by assessing the status of each step of the algorithm-we also aimed to determine how clinicians responded to the SGLT2i-related GTIs and UTIs. METHODS: We targeted all patients who were prescribed SGLT2i at Catholic University Seoul St. Mary's Hospital and Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital from January 2014 to August 2018. We developed algorithms for detection of SGLT2i-related GTIs or UTIs that divided patients into "most likely," "possibly" or "less likely" categories of GTIs or UTIs. The numbers of patients at each step were extracted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 4253 patients received their first prescription of SGLT2i. According to the algorithm used in this study, the proportions of "most likely GTI" and "possibly GTI" were 0.9% (37 out of 4253) and 19.4% (826 out of 4253 patients), respectively. Similarly, the proportions of "most likely UTI" and "possibly UTI" were 0.9% (38 out of 4253) and 20.2% (858 out of 4253 patients), respectively. Compared to the various existing prospective studies, both GTIs and UTIs showed lower occurrence among patients who met "most likely" criteria and higher occurrence among those who met "possibly" criteria. When a GTI or UTI occurred or was suspected, the overall rate of discontinuing SGLT2i was 51.8% (1721 out of 3323). Despite a confirmed or suspected GTI and an UTI, 62.8% (1460 out of 2323) and 14.2% (142 out of 1000) of patients continued to take SGLT2i, respectively. The discontinuation rate for suspected GTIs was significantly lower than that for suspected UTIs (37.2% vs. 85.8%, p < 0.001). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In this study, although the GTIs appeared to have a similar occurrence as UTIs, however, the discontinuation rate of SGLT2i for suspected GTIs was relatively lower. Our study is novel in that we identified how the physicians approached SGLT2i-related GTIs or UTIs at each step in a real-world clinical practice setting. Although we could estimate SGLT2i-related GTIs and UTIs via CDM, we were limited in our ability to accurately detect mild drug side effects via CDM, which lacked data for operational definition.

Potential Safety Issues with Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, Particularly in People with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a major advance in the fields of diabetology, nephrology, and cardiology. The cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are likely largely independent of their glycaemic effects, and this understanding is central to the use of these agents in the high-risk population of people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. There are a number of potential safety issues associated with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors. These include the rare but serious risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and necrotising fasciitis of the perineum. The data regarding a possibly increased risk of lower limb amputation and fracture with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy are conflicting. This article aims to explore the potential safety issues associated with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors, with a particular focus on the safety of these drugs in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. We discuss strategies that clinicians can implement to minimise the risk of adverse effects including diabetic ketoacidosis and volume depletion. Risk mitigation strategies with respect to SGLT2 inhibitor-associated diabetic ketoacidosis are of particular importance during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Best practices for safe use of SGLT-2 inhibitors developed from an expert panel Delphi consensus process.

PURPOSE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have demonstrated glycemic efficacy and cardiovascular and renal benefits in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, they are also associated with serious adverse events (AEs), but little consensus exists for clinicians regarding AE management. This study aimed to develop a list of best practices for the safe use and monitoring of SGLT-2 inhibitors in people with T2DM. METHODS: A 15-member interprofessional panel was surveyed in a four-round Delphi process. Panelists were asked to comment on and rank statements regarding initial prescribing considerations and actions for minimizing and managing eight specific AEs and a broad category for other AEs. In the final round, panelists selected if the statements should be considered a best practice specific to SGLT-2 inhibitors, a best practice for general safe medication use in T2DM, or if the statement should not be considered as a best practice for safe medication use. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 36 best practice statements specific to SGLT-2 inhibitors and 24 statements as general best practices for safe medication use. Fifty-six percent of the best practice statements for SGLT-2 inhibitors related to managing and/or preventing hypotension, urinary tract infections, and genital infections. The general best practices for safe medication use primarily focused on medication histories, past medical history considerations, physical exam components, and patient education. CONCLUSION: A list of best practice statements was developed using the Delphi method, which can be utilized by clinicians to guide the safe use and monitoring of SGLT-2 inhibitors in people with T2DM.

Safety of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have a well-defined safety profile based on data obtained from numerous clinical trials, including cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) and postmarketing pharmacovigilance reporting. Adverse events including risk of genital mycotic infection and volume depletion-related events are consistent with the mechanism of action of this drug class. However, several emergent (albeit infrequent) serious safety issues have also been reported. In their respective CVOTs, the proportion of patients with reported diabetic ketoacidosis was similar in empagliflozin or canagliflozin compared with their placebo groups, but it was higher for dapagliflozin. Canagliflozin may be associated with an increased risk of bone fracture and lower limb amputation; however, data are inconclusive. There is no evidence linking SGLT2 inhibitors with an increased risk of cancer, but these agents, particularly dapagliflozin, should be used with caution in patients with hematuria or a history of bladder cancer. Postmarketing reports of acute kidney injury have occurred in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors, and cases identified in recent CVOTs occurred with similar frequency in SGLT2 inhibitor and placebo groups. Common adverse events associated with SGLT2 inhibitors (such as genital infections or volume depletion) are generally mild and manageable by patients or by primary care physicians, and the risk of rare events (such as ketoacidosis) can be minimized by appropriate patient selection and early recognition of symptoms. When selecting treatment, it is important that clinicians weigh the known risks of SGLT2 inhibitors against their proven benefits, including the reduction of adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes.

Long-term efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: 104-week VERTIS MET trial.

AIM: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 104-week Phase III, randomized double-blind study with a 26-week placebo-controlled period (Phase A) and a 78-week period (Phase B) where blinded glimepiride was added to non-rescued placebo participants with fasting fingerstick glucose ≥6.1 mmol/L. Results through week 104 are reported. RESULTS: Mean (standard error) change in HbA1c from baseline was -0.7% (0.07) and -1.0% (0.07) at week 52; -0.6% (0.08) and -0.9% (0.08) at week 104 for ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg. At week 52, 34.8% and 36.6% participants had HbA1c <7.0%, and 24.6% and 33.7% at week 104, for ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg. Ertugliflozin reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight and systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline through week 104. The incidence of female genital mycotic infections (GMIs) was higher with ertugliflozin, and symptomatic hypoglycaemia was lower for ertugliflozin versus placebo/glimepiride. Minimal bone mineral density (BMD) changes were observed, similar to placebo/glimepiride, except at total hip where reduction in BMD was greater with ertugliflozin 15 mg versus placebo/glimepiride: difference in least squares means (95% CI) -0.50% (-0.95, -0.04) at week 52 and -0.84% (-1.44, -0.24) at week 104. CONCLUSIONS: Ertugliflozin maintained improvements from baseline in HbA1c, FPG, body weight and SBP through week 104. Ertugliflozin was well tolerated, with non-clinically relevant changes in BMD. Compared with placebo/glimepiride, ertugliflozin increased female GMIs, but reduced the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02033889.

Comparative risk of genital infections associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.

The extent to which sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors increase the risk of genital infections in routine clinical care, compared with other antidiabetic medications, is not clear, or whether the increased risk is consistent across gender or age subgroups, within individual SGLT2 agents, or if it is more pronounced at a particular time after treatment initiation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using two US commercial claims databases (2013-2017). In the primary analysis, 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts of female and male subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating SGLT2 versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were created. The outcome was a composite of genital candidal infections, vaginitis or vulvovaginitis in women, and genital candidal infections, balanitis, balanoposthitis, phimosis or paraphimosis in men. Among propensity score-matched cohorts of 129 994 women and 156 074 men, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and excess risk per 1000 person-years for SGLT2 versus DPP-4 inhibitors was 2.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.64, 2.99) and 87.4 (95% CI, 79.1, 96.2) respectively for women, and was 2.68 (95% CI, 2.31, 3.11) and 11.9 (95% CI, 9.3-15.0) for men. Findings were similar in the SGLT2 inhibitor versus GLP-1 agonist comparison, more pronounced in the subgroup of patients aged ≥60 (HR, 4.45 [95% CI, 3.83-5.17] in women and 3.30 [95% CI, 2.56-4.25] in men), and no meaningful difference across individual SGLT2 inhibitors was identified. This increase in risk was evident in the first month of treatment initiation and remained elevated throughout the course of therapy. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with an approximately 3-fold increase in risk of genital infections.

The renoprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without prevalent kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) concerning kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with or without prevalent kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with SGLT2is versus placebo in patients with T2DM. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied for continuous variables, and the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% CI were used for dichotomous outcomes. Patients were categorized according to whether the baseline mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was less or was more than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . RESULTS: A total of 25 eligible studies with 43 721 participants were included. There was an initial and small decrease in eGFR during the early treatment period (WMD, -4.63; 95% CI, -6.08 to -3.19 mL/min/1.73 m2 ), which was noted at 1-6 weeks and gradually narrowed over time, with a decline in protection from eGFR in the long term (WMD, 3.82; 95% CI, 2.80-4.85 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). SGLT2is significantly delayed albuminuria progression (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.66-0.76), promoted albuminuria regression (RR,1.71; 95% CI, 1.54-1.90), improved the composite of ≥40% decrease in eGFR, in the need for renal-replacement and in death from renal causes (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49-0.66), and reduced all-cause mortality (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94). At the same time, they significantly increased the risk of genital infection (RR, 3.43; 95% CI, 2.87-4.10) vs placebo in patients with T2DM. Meta-regression analyses showed that eGFR-preservation effects were not significantly associated with basic patient characteristics (age, BMI, HbA1c, eGFR level), but were influenced by drug administration (treatment duration, type, dosage of SGLT2is). Subgroup analyses showed that the relative effects on renal outcomes of SGLT2is vs placebo were similar across eGFR subgroups (P heterogeneity >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2is slowed eGFR decline, lowered albuminuria progression, improved adverse renal endpoints and reduced all-cause mortality, but increased risk of genital infections vs placebo in patients with T2DM. The indication of consistent renal benefits across categories of baseline eGFR levels may allow additional individuals to benefit from SGLT2is therapy.

Dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.

OBJECTIVE: This analysis compared the efficacy and safety of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, dapagliflozin, and the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor, saxagliptin, both added on to metformin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis from a double-blind, randomized, 24-week clinical trial (NCT01606007) of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin. We compared the dapagliflozin 10 mg (n = 179) and saxagliptin 5 mg (n = 176) treatment arms. RESULTS: Dapagliflozin showed significantly greater mean reductions versus saxagliptin in HbA1c (difference versus saxagliptin [95% CI]: -0.32% [-0.54, -0.10]; p < 0.005), fasting plasma glucose (-0.98 [-1.42, -0.54] mmol/L; p < 0.0001), body weight (-2.39 [-3.08, -1.71] kg; p < 0.0001) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-3.89 [-6.15, -1.63] mmHg; p < 0.001). More dapagliflozintreated than saxagliptin-treated patients achieved the composite endpoint of HbA1c reduction ≥ 0.5%, weight loss ≥ 2 kg, SBP reduction ≥ 2 mmHg and no major/minor hypoglycemia (24% versus 7%). No major events of hypoglycemia were reported. More patients on dapagliflozin (6%) versus saxagliptin (0.6%) experienced genital infections. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin demonstrated greater glycemic efficacy than saxagliptin with additional benefits on weight and SBP, and the safety profile was consistent with previous studies.

Prostatitis, other genitourinary infections and prostate cancer risk: Influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? Results from the EPICAP study.

Epidemiological studies have suggested that prostatitis may increase the risk of prostate cancer due to chronic inflammation. We studied the association between several genitourinary infections and the risk of prostate cancer based on data from the EPICAP study. EPICAP is a population-based case-control study conducted in the département of Hérault, France, between 2012 and 2014. A total of 819 incident cases and 879 controls have been face to face interviewed using a standardized questionnaire gathering information on known or suspected risk factors of prostate cancer, and personal history of genitourinary infections: prostatitis, urethritis, orchi-epididymitis, and acute pyelonephritis. Odds Ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval were estimated using multivariate unconditional logistic regression. Overall, 139 (18%) cases and 98 (12%) controls reported having at least one personal history of genitourinary infections (OR = 1.64 [1.23-2.20]). The risk increased with the number of infections (p-trend < 0.05). The association was specifically observed with personal history of chronic prostatitis and acute pyelonephritis (OR = 2.95 [1.26-6.92] and OR = 2.66 [1.29-5.51], respectively) and in men who did not use any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 2.00 [1.37-2.91]). Our results reinforce the hypothesis that chronic inflammation, generated by a personal history of genitourinary infections, may play a role in prostate carcinogenesis.

Dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pooled analysis of safety data from phase IIb/III clinical trials.

AIM: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dapagliflozin, a highly selective sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Data were pooled from 13 placebo-controlled trials of up to 24 weeks' duration (dapagliflozin, n = 2360; placebo, n = 2295). Larger placebo-/comparator-controlled pools of 21 (≤208 weeks; dapagliflozin, n = 5936; control, n = 3403) and 30 trials (≥12 weeks; dapagliflozin, n = 9195; control, n = 4629) assessed the rare adverse events (AEs) of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and lower limb amputation, respectively. RESULTS: Over 24 weeks, the overall incidence of AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) was similar for dapagliflozin and placebo: 60.0% vs 55.7% and 5.1% vs 5.4%, respectively. Rates of hypoglycaemia, volume depletion AEs, urinary tract infections (UTIs) and fractures were balanced between the groups. Genital infections were more frequent with dapagliflozin (5.5%) vs placebo (0.6%) and renal function AEs occurred in 3.2% vs 1.8% of patients (the most common renal AE was decreased creatinine clearance: 1.1% vs 0.7%). In the 21-study pool, 1 SAE of DKA and 3 AEs of ketonuria/metabolic acidosis occurred with dapagliflozin vs none with control; estimated combined incidence for these events was 0.03% (95% confidence interval 0.010-0.089). In the 30-study pool, lower limb amputation occurred in 8 (0.1%) and 7 (0.2%) patients receiving dapagliflozin and control, respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence rates of AEs and SAEs were similar in the dapagliflozin and placebo/control groups, including the incidence of hypoglycaemia, volume depletion, fractures, UTIs, amputations and DKA. Genital infections were more frequent with dapagliflozin than placebo.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors moderate the risk of genitourinary tract infections associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.

Genitourinary tract infections (GUTIs) are the most common adverse event (AE) occurring during therapy with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. We evaluated whether dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors moderate the risk of GUTI during SGLT2 inhibitor therapy, using two approaches. First, we screened the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing the frequency of GUTIs in patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitor/SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapy vs those receiving an SGLT2 inhibitor only. In the five trials we retrieved, the pooled risk ratio for genital tract infections (GTIs) in patients on DPP-4 inhibitor/SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapy vs those on SGLT2 inhibitors alone was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.92). Second, we found that within the Food and Drug Administration AE Reporting System, the frequency of GUTIs among reports listing both SGLT2 and DPP-4 inhibitors as suspect or concomitant drugs was significantly lower than among reports listing SGLT2 inhibitors without DPP-4 inhibitors, with a proportional reporting ratio of 0.74 (95% CI 0.61-0.90). In conclusion, in RCTs and in a large pharmacovigilance database, combination therapy with a DPP-4 inhibitor appears to reduce the frequency of G(U)TIs associated with SGLT2 inhibitors.