Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 488
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e080603, 2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816058

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although adolescents make treatment gains in psychiatric residential treatment (RT), they experience significant difficulty adapting to the community and often do not sustain treatment gains long term. Their parents are often not provided with the necessary support or behaviour management skillset to bridge the gap between RT and home. Parent training, a gold standard behaviour management strategy, may be beneficial for parents of these youth and web-based parent training programmes may engage this difficult-to-reach population. This study focuses on a hybrid parent training programme that combines Parenting Wisely (PW), a web-based parent training with facilitated discussion groups (Parenting Wisely for Residential Treatment (PWRT)). This study aims to: (1) establish the feasibility and acceptability of PWRT, (2) evaluate whether PWRT engages target mechanisms (parental self-efficacy, parenting behaviours, social support, family function) and (3) determine the effects of PWRT on adolescent outcomes (internalising and externalising behaviours, placement restrictiveness). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this randomised control trial, parents (n=60) will be randomly assigned to PWRT or treatment as usual. Each week for 6 weeks, parents in the PWRT condition will complete two PW modules (20 min each) and attend one discussion group via Zoom (90 min). Adolescents (n=60) will not receive intervention; however, we will evaluate the feasibility of adolescent data collection for future studies. Data from parents and adolescents will be collected at baseline, post intervention (6 weeks post baseline) and 6 months post baseline to allow for a robust understanding of the longer-term effects of PWRT on treatment gain maintenance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board (protocol number 2022B0315). The outcomes of the study will be shared through presentations at both local and national conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to the families and organisations that helped to facilitate the project. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05764369 (V.1, December 2022).


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Parenting , Parents , Residential Treatment , Humans , Adolescent , Parents/psychology , Parents/education , Residential Treatment/methods , Parenting/psychology , Female , Male , Mental Disorders/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Social Support
2.
J Subst Use Addict Treat ; 161: 209315, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378078

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness training is effective in recovery from substance use disorders; however, adoption can be difficult due to environmental and personal distractions. Virtual reality (VR) may help overcome these challenges by providing an immersive environment for practicing mindfulness, but there is currently limited knowledge regarding patient and provider perceptions of VR-based tools. OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of VR mindfulness training for veterans in residential substance use treatment as well as potential benefits of VR mindfulness interventions in this population. We conducted a pilot feasibility/acceptability study as a first step toward conducting a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: The study recruited participants (N = 32) from a 30-day residential substance use program and collected both qualitative and quantitative feedback on the VR mindfulness intervention using a mixed-methods approach. Patients (n = 20) and providers (n = 12) rated the acceptability, usability, and satisfaction of the intervention. Using a within-subjects design, patients provided pre-post emotion ratings and reported on state mindfulness and VR presence after completing a single-session self-guided VR mindfulness intervention. Patients provided qualitative interview data on their overall impressions, while providers gave the same information via survey. RESULTS: Both patients and providers reported high satisfaction and confidence in the intervention. Moreover, within subjects t-tests showed that patients experienced significant reductions in negative affect and significant increases in positive affect from pre-post, along with high levels of state mindfulness and presence. Results of thematic analysis revealed that the intervention facilitated focused attention on the present moment, induced a state of calm and relaxation, and reduced negative thoughts and emotions. Participants requested improvements such as better integration of audiovisual elements, a more personalized and longer intervention, and more comfortable fitting headset. Finally, the intervention presented with several advantages compared to other mindfulness experiences including reduced distractions and a sense of safety and privacy. CONCLUSIONS: Self-guided VR mindfulness intervention is feasible and acceptable to patients and providers. VR mindfulness training provides an immersive experience that uplifts mood and reduces distractions. VR may provide a scaffolding tool to set the stage for deepening mindfulness skills. Results of the present study could inform further development and tailoring for future interventions.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Mindfulness , Residential Treatment , Substance-Related Disorders , Veterans , Virtual Reality , Humans , Mindfulness/methods , Veterans/psychology , Pilot Projects , Male , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Female , Residential Treatment/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy/methods
3.
Behav Ther ; 55(2): 391-400, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418048

ABSTRACT

Many adults with OCD experience residual symptoms following CBT, with or without medication. A potential target for enhancing treatment effectiveness is family accommodation (FA). This study examined (1) possible sociodemographic and clinical correlates of FA in adults presenting for intensive/residential treatment, and (2) temporal relationships between FA and OCD symptom severity during acute treatment and follow-up phases. Adult patients (N = 315) completed baseline measures of FA and OCD symptom severity at admission to IRT. Follow-up data were collected from a subset of participants (n = 111) at discharge, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up. Cross-lagged panel analysis showed that changes in OCD symptom severity from admission to discharge predicted changes in FA from discharge to 1-month follow-up. Increases in FA from discharge to 1-month follow-up predicted increases in OCD symptom severity from 1-month to 6-month follow-up. Female patients reported greater baseline FA from their family members than did males, and there were no significant differences in FA by relationship type or marital status. Contamination, Responsibility for Harm, and Symmetry/Incompleteness symptoms were each found to uniquely predict FA at admission. Results from this study provide support for the temporal precedence of FA reduction in OCD symptom improvement as adults transition home following residential treatment.


Subject(s)
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Male , Adult , Humans , Female , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Residential Treatment/methods , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs ; 85(3): 381-388, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206669

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to characterize the relationship between physical pain experienced at time of entry to residential treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs) and the frequency of treatment dropout. We hypothesized that both endorsement of recent pain and higher magnitude of endorsed pain intensity would be associated with higher dropout rates. We further hypothesized that these effects would be exacerbated among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). METHOD: Participants included 1,095 individuals in residential treatment for SUD. Data were collected within 24 hours of treatment entry. Analyses were conducted using logistic regression with dropout as the dependent variable. Dropout was operationally defined as leaving treatment against medical advice or being discharged from treatment because of use of substances. Pain (including endorsement and intensity) was the primary independent variable in all analyses. Analyses included demographic and affective covariates and included both main effects of OUD and interaction terms between OUD and pain. RESULTS: Pain endorsement was associated with greater frequency of dropout (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, p = .04). Higher levels of pain intensity predicted increased rates of dropout (OR = 1.13, p < .01). In contrast with our hypothesis, no interactions between OUD and pain were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the import of integrating pain monitoring and pain interventions as core components of treatment for SUD. Our findings are highly consistent with a growing literature recognizing the impact of pain across a constellation of important treatment outcomes and provide novel data strongly suggesting that pain predicts early cessation of treatment.


Subject(s)
Opioid-Related Disorders , Pain , Patient Dropouts , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Pain/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Residential Treatment/methods
5.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 255: 111081, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38211367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior reviews of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have found mixed support for residential level of care but are limited by methodology problems and the ethical concerns of randomizing patients with severe SUD to lower levels of care. METHODS: The present study is the first to use a large archival SUD residential sample with a matched comparison group and one-year follow-up period to examine the benefits of residential treatment provided to adults clinically assessed as warranting SUD residential care. We used propensity score matching in our sample (N = 6177) of veterans with a SUD who were screened and accepted for Veterans Affairs (VA) SUD residential treatment between January 1st, 2019 and June 30th, 2019. RESULTS: We found evidence that VA SUD residential treatment saves veteran lives with an average 66% all-cause mortality risk reduction during the study period (b = -1.09, exp(b) = 0.34, p <0.001). Medium-to-large residential pre- to post-treatment self-reported mental health and SUD symptom improvements (|SMDrobust| = 0.54-0.93) were sustained by one-year post-screening. These residential treatment improvements were significantly larger than estimated counterfactual outcomes across self-reported SUD and stress disorder symptoms at one-year post-screening (ps <0.001). We found mixed behavioral, service utilization, and other self-reported mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that VA SUD residential treatment is an effective level of care for veterans warranting residential care particularly for SUD symptom improvements and reductions in mortality risk.


Subject(s)
Substance-Related Disorders , Veterans , Adult , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Veterans/psychology , Residential Treatment/methods , Propensity Score , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy
6.
Child Abuse Negl ; 146: 106487, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37837713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Youth with severe emotional or behavioral issues who are involved with child welfare authorities are sometimes placed in intensive care services in a residential treatment program. Evidence-based psychotherapies are often used in residential treatments, but there is very little research on how to adapt psychotherapy for residential treatment. OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy (the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children) in a residential treatment program for children. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Staff (n = 20) at a residential facility in Calgary, Canada. METHODS: A combination of qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted before and after therapy to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data were analyzed and reported using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies. RESULTS: Modifications were made to the program including creating inclusive language, integrating relevant content targeting pediatric irritability, delivering sessions online for caregivers, and using additional staff to support youth to learn and practice the application of the content and behavioral interventions. Key barriers to implementation of the Unified Protocol included staff turnover and the difficulty of sustaining a critical mass of knowledge surrounding the Unified Protocol. The major facilitators to implementation were the perceived quality of the program and advantages of the program to children and their caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the feasibility and acceptability of providing transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapies for children in residential treatment and provides a template for how to implement evidence-based practice in residential treatment.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Residential Treatment , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Residential Treatment/methods , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Psychotherapy/methods , Qualitative Research , Focus Groups
7.
Subst Use Misuse ; 58(7): 930-938, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37014022

ABSTRACT

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are frequent concerns among healthcare providers serving military personnel and Veterans, and SUDs are also associated with high healthcare utilization. Problematic substance use is consistently associated with deficits in emotion regulation, and changes in emotional regulatory processes may be important factors during treatment and recovery. Methods: The present study examined emotion regulation and substance use risk and protective factors among Veterans seeking residential treatment for SUD within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Data were collected from 138 Veterans at pre-treatment and post-treatment to examine if changes in emotion regulation were associated with post-treatment outcomes. Results: Results indicated difficulties with emotion dysregulation at discharge predicted substance use risk factors, but not substance use protective factors, after controlling for scores at intake. Emotion regulation significantly improved throughout the course of treatment. Facets of emotion dysregulation at post-treatment, specifically difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior, lower emotional clarity, lower emotional awareness, and more impulse control difficulties, predicted future admission to withdrawal management services, but not future mental health engagement, mortality, or resumed use (positive urine drug screen). Conclusions: Emotion regulation skills may be valuable treatment components, as they are related to reduced substance use risk factors; however, the results of improved emotion regulation were mixed for other measures of treatment outcome.


Subject(s)
Substance-Related Disorders , Veterans , Humans , Residential Treatment/methods , Protective Factors , Emotions , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology
8.
Psychother Res ; 33(4): 442-454, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36314194

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Intensive residential treatment (IRT) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) includes frequent meetings with a cognitive-behavioral therapist. We examined whether this therapeutic working alliance relates to IRT outcomes. METHOD: Data came from a naturalistic sample of patients with OCD (n = 124) who received IRT at a specialty OCD clinic. Patients completed measures of OCD severity and well-being at admission and discharge. Both the patient and treating psychologist completed the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-SF). Alliance ratings were tested as predictors in models predicting outcomes (discharge scores adjusting for baseline and treatment duration) as well as logistic regression predicting treatment response (≥35% symptom reduction in OCD symptoms). RESULTS: Patient and clinician ratings of the quality of the alliance were weakly yet significantly correlated. Patient ratings of the alliance predicted outcomes, while therapist ratings did not. Moreover, greater discrepancy between patient and client ratings predicted worse outcomes. Patient ratings of the task dimension of the alliance uniquely related to responder status. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions of the working alliance, particularly as pertaining to agreement on therapeutic tasks, related to success with IRT for OCD. Further study is needed test interventions to improve task alliance as a strategy to enhance treatment.


Subject(s)
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Therapeutic Alliance , Humans , Residential Treatment/methods , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs ; 83(3): 383-391, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35590179

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether self-help group (SHG) attendance during treatment episodes in short-term residential programs increases treatment commitment among adults with substance use disorders (SUDs) in the United States. METHOD: This cross-sectional study used the 2018 Treatment Episode Data Set-Discharges (TEDS-D), made available by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The effect of SHG attendance frequency was examined on three outcomes: (a) treatment completion and (b) retention, analyzed by multivariable logistic regression models; and (c) time-to-dropout, estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Of the 75,252 discharges, 38% did not complete the planned treatment. SHG attendance frequency of eight times or more during the treatment episode had a significantly strong association with treatment completion and retention and time-to-dropout. Compared with individuals who did not attend any SHG, individuals attending SHG meetings eight or more times were more than three times as likely to complete treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 3.31, 95% CI [3.15, 3.49]). Similarly, SHG attendance frequency of eight or more times significantly reduced the dropout risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.32, 95% CI [0.31, 0.34]). Among discharges that dropped out, we found a positive dose-response relationship between SHG attendance frequency and retention. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a strong association between frequent SHG attendance of 8-30 times and improvement in treatment completion and retention, as well as a reduction in early dropout within short-term residential facilities for adults with SUDs. Expanding self-help options in short-term residential settings is warranted.


Subject(s)
Residential Treatment , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Residential Facilities , Residential Treatment/methods , Self-Help Groups , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Treatment Outcome , United States
10.
J Consult Clin Psychol ; 90(5): 413-426, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35404638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Moral reconation therapy (MRT) is a cognitive-behavioral intervention to reduce risk for criminal recidivism. Despite being implemented widely in correctional settings, there are no randomized controlled trials of MRT, and its effectiveness for reducing recidivism among justice-involved adults in noncorrectional settings is unknown. METHOD: In a pragmatic trial, 341 justice-involved patients (95.3% male; 57.8% White/non-Hispanic) admitted to one of three mental health residential treatment programs were randomly assigned to usual care (UC) or UC plus two MRT groups per week for 12 weeks. Follow-ups were conducted at 6- and 12-month postbaseline (71.3% and 74.8% retention, respectively). Primary outcomes were criminal thinking and criminal associates. Secondary outcomes were legal problem severity, days incarcerated in the past 30, rearrested/charged (per official records), substance use, and employment and family/social problems. The study design, analysis, and outcomes were preregistered (ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT02524171). RESULTS: Patients in both conditions improved over time on most outcomes. In intent-to-treat analyses, the rate of change in outcomes over time did not differ by condition, nor did the prevalence of being rearrested and charged within 1 year of baseline (UC = 20.2%, MRT = 24.9%; OR = 1.14; 95% CI [0.67, 1.94], p = .63). MRT engagement was low; 37% of those randomized to MRT received a minimum dose-that is, completed at least Step 3. In per-protocol analyses, this subgroup, relative to UC, improved more on criminal associates, days incarcerated, legal problem severity, and alcohol use severity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, MRT was not more effective than UC at reducing recidivism risk for patients in mental health residential treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Recidivism , Residential Treatment , Adult , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Morals , Recidivism/prevention & control , Recidivism/psychology , Residential Treatment/methods
11.
J Consult Clin Psychol ; 89(6): 551-562, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34264702

ABSTRACT

Though popular across many audiences, engagement with a service dog has undergone limited empirical evaluation as a complementary or alternative treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The present study took advantage of a service dog training intervention underway in a Department of Veterans Affairs residential PTSD treatment program to perform a within-subjects comparison of a range of phenotypic markers. The present report considers negative and positive affect, assessed throughout the day, contrasting weeks when participants were or were not accompanied by their service dog. Fifty-four veterans were studied for 2-6 weeks. Negative and positive affect were sampled five times per day using items from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Participants also wore a single-patch ECG/activity recorder and slept on beds recording sleep actigraphically. Linear mixed effects regression was employed to estimate the effect of the presence of service dog on momentary affect in the context of other presumable influences. Missing data were managed using methods applicable to random and nonrandom missingness. In this sample, the presence of a service dog was associated with reduced negative and increased positive affect, with both effects diminishing over time. Only negative affect was associated with time in residential treatment, and only positive affect was associated with concurrent heart rate, activity, and the interaction of activity and prior-night actigraphic sleep efficiency. These results concur with prior reports of reduced PTSD symptomology in association with the presence of a service dog, and with the distinct neurocircuitries underlying defensive and appetitive emotion and motivation. Limitations derive from the artificial environment and brief duration of study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Animal Assisted Therapy/methods , Residential Treatment/methods , Service Animals , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Affect , Animals , Dogs , Heart Rate , Humans , Inpatients , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Sleep
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(6): e2113637, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152417

ABSTRACT

Importance: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals, who have a gender identity that differs from their sex assigned at birth, are at increased risk of mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, self-injurious behavior, and suicidality, relative to cisgender peers. Objective: To examine mental health outcomes among TGD vs cisgender adolescents in residential treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study's longitudinal design was used to compare groups at treatment entry and discharge, and 1-month postdischarge follow-up. The setting was an adolescent acute residential treatment program for psychiatric disorders. Participants were TGD or cisgender adolescents enrolled in the treatment program. Statistical analysis was performed October 2019 to March 2021. Exposure: Adolescents participated in a 2-week acute residential treatment program for psychiatric disorders. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were depressive (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]) and anxiety (the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children [MASC]) symptoms, and emotional dysregulation (the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale [DERS]), measured at treatment entry and discharge, and postdischarge follow-up. Age of depression onset, suicidality, self-injury, and childhood trauma also were assessed at treatment entry. Results: Of 200 adolescent participants who completed treatment entry and discharge assessments, the mean (SD) age was 16.2 (1.5) years; 109 reported being assigned female at birth (54.5%), 35 were TGD (17.5%), and 66 (49.3%) completed 1-month follow-up. TGD participants had an earlier mean (SD) age of depression onset (TGD: 10.8 [2.4] years vs cisgender: 11.9 [2.3] years; difference: 1.07 years; 95% CI, 0.14-2.01 years; P = .02), higher mean (SD) suicidality scores (TGD: 44.4 [23.1] vs cisgender: 28.5 [25.4]; difference: 16.0; 95% CI, 6.4-25.5; P = .001), more self-injurious behavior (mean [SD] RBQ-A score for TGD: 3.1 [2.5] vs cisgender: 1.7 [1.9]; difference: 1.42; 95% CI, 0.69-2.21; P = .001) and more childhood trauma (eg, mean [SD] CTQ-SF score for emotional abuse in TGD: 12.7 [5.4] vs cisgender: 9.8 [4.7]; difference: 2.85; 95% CI, 1.06-4.64; P = .002). The TGD group also had higher symptom scores (CES-D mean difference: 7.69; 95% CI, 3.30 to 12.08; P < .001; MASC mean difference: 7.56; 95% CI, 0.46 to 14.66; P = .04; and DERS mean difference: 18.43; 95% CI, 8.39 to 28.47; P < .001). Symptom scores were significantly higher at entry vs discharge (CES-D mean difference, -12.16; 95% CI, -14.50 to -9.80; P < .001; MASC mean difference: -3.79; 95% CI, -6.16 to -1.42; P = .02; and DERS mean difference: -6.37; 95% CI, -10.80 to -1.94; P = .05) and follow-up (CES-D mean difference: -9.69; 95% CI, -13.0 to -6.42; P < .001; MASC mean difference: -6.92; 95% CI, -10.25 to -3.59; P < .001; and DERS mean difference: -12.47; 95% CI, -18.68 to -6.26; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found mental health disparities in TGD youth relative to cisgender youth, with worse scores observed across assessment time points. For all participants, primary clinical outcome measures were significantly lower at treatment discharge than at entry, with no significant differences between discharge and 1-month follow-up. Given the substantial degree of mental health disparities reported in TGD individuals, these findings warrant focused clinical attention to optimize treatment outcomes in gender minority populations.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Hospitals, Psychiatric/standards , Residential Treatment/standards , Transgender Persons/psychology , Adolescent , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Residential Treatment/methods , Residential Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Transgender Persons/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Addict Dis ; 39(1): 140-143, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33036545

ABSTRACT

Managing infection control of the Corona virus disease (Covid-19) could be very challenging for substance use disorder (SUD) residential treatment programs. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is providing guidelines for the public on how to reduce the risk of contracting Covid-19. The American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) provided specific guidelines to assist clinicians in the mitigation of Covid-19 infection in residential SUD facilities. Controlling an infection in a SUD residential setting is challenging because these facilities are not locked, and they are considered a subacute level of care. In this commentary the details of the infection mitigation plan in a SUD residential setting will be explained along with the outcome measure of this plan.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Program Development , Residential Treatment/methods , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy
14.
J Behav Health Serv Res ; 48(2): 213-239, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32495249

ABSTRACT

Despite its recognized value, there is a gap in the assessment of patient satisfaction among patients with substance use disorder (SUD) in rehabilitation. The study objective was to determine patient satisfaction dimensions relevant to individuals receiving residential rehabilitation for SUD. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the following: (1) adult males enrolled in the program and (2) counseling staff involved in the care of these individuals. A literature review formed the basis for interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed. Text data was analyzed using directed content analysis to identify dimensions relevant to patient satisfaction. Eighteen individuals participated, including 14 men with SUD and four staff. Content analysis of the interview transcripts resulted in five themes: (1) counselor (skill), (2) programmatic structure (adhering), (3) skill development (personal responsibility), (4) comparison to other programs, and (5) case management facilitation. These dimensions will be utilized to create a patient satisfaction tool specific to SUD rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Residential Treatment/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , United States
15.
Res Dev Disabil ; 108: 103813, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33271448

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) represent a particularly vulnerable group to the threats posed by COVID-19. However, they have not yet been given a voice on how their living conditions have been affected by COVID-19. AIMS: This study aims to report the impact on people with IDD of COVID-19 and the response measures applied in Spain during the lockdown. METHOD: Data on 582 individuals with IDD were collected through a survey. Seven open questions were included to capture the perspectives of people with IDD on COVID-19 and its consequences. Content analysis was performed to identify themes and categories across participant responses. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the relationship between reporting a specific category and participants' characteristics. RESULTS: Supports have been conditioned by the living context. People living in specific settings had fewer natural supports, while those living with their family relied heavily on it. Participants also lacked supports considered necessary. It is worth stressing that persons with IDD have also provided support to others. CONCLUSIONS: Although people with IDD have generally received the assistance they need during the lockdown, it must be ensured that appropriate supports are provided regardless of the context in which they live.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Caregivers , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Developmental Disabilities/psychology , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Residential Treatment/methods , Self Care , Social Isolation/psychology , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology , Family Health , Female , Humans , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Male , Psychosocial Support Systems , SARS-CoV-2 , Self Care/methods , Self Care/psychology , Self Concept , Spain
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(12): e2028499, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351083

ABSTRACT

Importance: Engaging adolescent boys and young men in preventing violence against women is a potentially impactful public health strategy. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based, gender-transformative program (ie, Manhood 2.0) on perpetration of gender-based violence by adolescent boys and young men. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this unblinded cluster randomized clinical trial, neighborhoods were designated as the unit of clustering (1:1 allocation). Three-month (ie, time point 2 [T2]) and 9-month (ie, time point 3 [T3]) follow-ups were conducted. The trial took place in 20 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, neighborhoods and 1 centrally located site with concentrated disadvantage. Pittsburgh-based adolescent boys and young men (ages 13 to 19 years) were recruited between July 27, 2015, and June 5, 2017, through youth-serving organizations and community-based alternatives to residential placement for juvenile justice-involved youth. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted from June 2018 to November 2019. Interventions: Manhood 2.0, an international program adapted for adolescent boys and young men in US urban communities, encourages these individuals to challenge gender norms that foster violence against women and unhealthy sexual relationships. Individuals in the control population received job-readiness training. Each program was 18 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in participant-level perpetration of sexual violence (SV) or adolescent relationship abuse (ARA) at T3. Results: Among 866 participants, 465 individuals (54%) enrolled in 11 intervention clusters and 401 individuals (46%) enrolled in 10 control clusters. In the intervention group, 325 participants (70%) were analyzed at T2 and 334 participants (72%) were analyzed at T3; in the control group, 262 participants (65%) were analyzed at T2 and 301 participants (75%) were analyzed at T3. Mean (SD) age was 15.5 (1.6) years; 609 participants (70%) self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, and 178 (20%) self-identified as Hispanic, multiracial, or other race/ethnicity other than White. Among individuals in the intervention group, 296 participants (64%) reported any SV or ARA perpetration at baseline, and 173 participants (52%) reported any SV or ARA perpetration at T3. Among individuals in the control group, 213 participants (53%) reported any SV or ARA perpetration at baseline, and 124 participants (41%) reported any SV or ARA perpetration at T3). The difference in reduction between groups was not significant. There was no evidence of an intervention effect for the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% CI, 0.86-2.01; P = .20). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings from this evaluation of a community-based gender-transformative program for adolescent boys and young men did not show a significant intervention effect in reducing SV or ARA perpetration between Manhood 2.0 and a job-readiness control program. Combining gender-transformative approaches with job-readiness programs may be relevant for violence prevention in low-resource urban settings. Attention to improving implementation and strategies to sustain such community-based efforts are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02427061.


Subject(s)
Intimate Partner Violence , Public Health/methods , Residential Treatment/methods , Sex Offenses , Adolescent , Efficiency, Organizational , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Intimate Partner Violence/prevention & control , Intimate Partner Violence/psychology , Male , Needs Assessment , Program Development , Sex Offenses/prevention & control , Sex Offenses/psychology , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Urban Population , Young Adult
17.
Bull Menninger Clin ; 84(Supplement A): 12-33, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33074022

ABSTRACT

Studies investigating the impact of depressive symptoms on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treatment have yielded mixed findings. The purpose of the study is to extend previous research, which primarily used outpatient samples, to determine whether depression affects OCD treatment outcome among patients receiving intensive residential treatment. OCD patients receiving residential treatment based primarily on exposure and response prevention (ERP) provided data regarding symptoms of depression and OCD at admission and discharge. Patients reported large and significant reductions in OCD symptoms over the course of treatment. Change in OCD symptoms was not significantly affected by depressive symptoms, including patients with severe depressive symptoms. Change in depressive symptoms over the course of treatment was, however, robustly related to change in OCD symptoms, especially among patients who began treatment with severe symptoms of depression. These findings suggest that cognitive-behavior therapy delivered in a residential treatment setting drastically reduces OCD symptoms regardless of depressive symptoms.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/complications , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/complications , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Psychotherapy/methods , Residential Treatment/methods , Adult , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Female , Humans , Implosive Therapy , Male , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Recreation Therapy , Treatment Outcome
18.
Child Abuse Negl ; 109: 104702, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891971

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many children and youth living in residential units have experienced multiple traumas that may result in challenging behaviors. Among a range of professional responses, staff may use restraint, seclusion and time-out to manage these behaviors. OBJECTIVE: To enhance our understanding of these restrictive interventions in residential units as a means of improving professional practices involving children and youth in out-of-home care. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Administrative data were used. Restrictive intervention data for 324 children and youth (29 units) over a 6-month period were extracted. METHODS: Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of children and youth with distinct restrictive intervention profiles. Children and youth in these profiles were compared on individual (age, sex, ethnic group, length of stay in unit, reasons for services) and environmental characteristics (unit type, type of services, specialized designation). RESULTS: Restrictive interventions, especially time-outs, were frequent (5136 interventions; 69% time-outs), yet approximately half of the sample did not experience any. Restraints, seclusions and time-outs differed in frequency, duration and reason for use. A two-profile model was favored for children and youth who were subjected to restrictive interventions (classification accuracy = 94%). Children and youth in these two profiles differed from each other, and from those not subjected to restrictive interventions, on numerous individual and environmental characteristics. CONCLUSION: The use of restrictive interventions is frequent, and attention should be paid to individual and environmental risk factors identified in this study (i.e., being a boy, non-Caucasian, taken into care for neglect, and having a longer stay in unit).


Subject(s)
Group Homes/statistics & numerical data , Patient Isolation/methods , Residential Treatment/methods , Restraint, Physical/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Isolation/psychology , Patient Isolation/statistics & numerical data , Quebec , Residential Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Restraint, Physical/psychology , Restraint, Physical/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
19.
Int J Eat Disord ; 53(10): 1647-1656, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32864806

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Eating disorder (ED) treatment outcomes are highly variable from beginning to end of treatment; however, little is known about differential trajectories during the course of treatment. This study sought to characterize heterogeneous patterns of ED treatment response during residential care. METHOD: Participants were adolescent girls and adult women (N = 360) receiving residential ED treatment for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, other specified feeding or eating disorder, unspecified feeding or eating disorder, or avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Self-report symptom assessments were completed at admission, discharge, and approximately weekly throughout the residential stay to assess curvilinear patterns of change. Latent growth mixture modeling was applied to identify subgroups of patients with similar treatment response trajectories. RESULTS: Three latent groups emerged, including gradual response (58.3%; steady improvements from admission to discharge), rapid response (23.9%; steep early improvements that were maintained through discharge), and low-symptom static response (17.8%; nearly nonclinical self-reported symptoms at admission that remained static through discharge). Groups differed on important clinical characteristics, such as body mass index, endorsement of compensatory behaviors, severity of global ED psychopathology at admission, and degree of symptom improvement by end of treatment. DISCUSSION: Patients follow heterogeneous response patterns in residential ED treatment, and these patterns are associated with differential treatment outcome. Future work should explore whether these trajectories are associated with differential outcomes at follow-up and whether tailoring clinical intervention to a patient's trajectory type can improve treatment response.


Subject(s)
Feeding and Eating Disorders/therapy , Psychopathology/methods , Residential Treatment/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 52(5): 472-481, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748709

ABSTRACT

Recent research highlighted the therapeutic potential of ayahuasca, a psychoactive plant brew used ritually in traditional Amazonian medicine (TAM). The present study evaluates the impact of integrating ayahuasca and TAM with psychotherapy on depression and anxiety in an inpatient addiction treatment program. Male patients (N = 31) were evaluated pre and post treatment using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, motivation, quality of life, spirituality, and treatment satisfaction were also measured and analyzed by means of two tailed t-test, one way ANOVA and Spearman test. From pre- to post-treatment, patients showed significant reductions in scores of anxiety (from 20.8 to 11.6, p < .002) and depression (from 18.7 to 7.5, p <.001). Similarly, patients showed higher scores of quality of life (p < .001) and spirituality (p < .001) upon discharge, which correlated with their reduction in scores of anxiety and depression. While future results will evaluate the efficacy of this treatment on measures of addiction at follow-up, the present results build upon previous research to bring further support to the use of Ayahuasca and Amazonian medicine in mental health treatments with a transpersonal focus.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Banisteriopsis , Depression/therapy , Medicine, Traditional/methods , Psychotherapy/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Adult , Ceremonial Behavior , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Pilot Projects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life , Residential Treatment/methods , Spirituality , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...