[Thrombolysis treatment and multi- disciplinary management of central retinal artery occlusion in comparison with traditional ophthalmological treatment options]. / Arteria centralis retinae elzáródás thrombolysiskezelése és multidiszciplináris ellátása a hagyományos szemészeti kezelési formákkal összehasonlítva.

Background and purpose:

The management of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) has long been conservative therapy with limited efficacy carried out in ophthalmology departments together with etiolo­gi­cal investigations lacking a standardised protocol. However, CRAO is analogous to ischemic central nervous system stroke and is associated with increased stroke risk, thus, systemic thrombolysis treatment and multidisciplinary management can be beneficial. Since May 2022, at Semmelweis University CRAO patients diagnosed within 4.5 hours are given intravenous thrombolysis therapy and undergo etiologic workup based on current stroke protocols. Here we report our experience with the multidisciplinary, protocol-based management of CRAO in comparison with former non-protocol based ophthalmological conservative treatment.

We reviewed CRAO patients’ data treated conservatively and with paracentesis within 6 hours at the Department of Ophthalmology between 2013 and 2022 including changes in visual acuity, neurolo­gical and cardiovascular findings compared to those in the thrombolysis project. 

Of the 78 patients receiving non-protocol care, visual improvement was seen in 37% with natural course, 47% with conservative treatment and 47% with paracentesis. Four patients had significant carotid stenosis (2 underwent endarterectomy), 1 carotid dissection, 6 cardioembolism and 1 giant cell arteritis. Of the 4 patients within 4,5 hours, 3 gave their consent to the clinical trial and were treated with thrombolysis and underwent a full etiological assessment. 
2 pa­tients had improved visual acuity, 2 pa­tients had significant carotid stenosis and underwent endarterectomy, 1 patient was started on anticoagulation for newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation.

CRAO patients presenting within 4,5 hours are rare and more patients are needed in our study to establish the efficacy of thrombolysis. However uniform protocollized evaluation helps identifying embolic sources thus, avoiding further and potentially more serious thromboembolic events.

Association of Occlusive Retinal Vasculitis With Intravitreal Faricimab.

This case report describes a patient with attenuation of retinal arterioles and veins associated with 2 blot hemorrhages and pallor of the inferotemporal retina without emboli.

Superselective Arterial Hyaluronidase Thrombolysis is an Effective Treatment for Hyaluronic Acid-Induced Retinal Artery Occlusion: Study in a Rabbit Model.

BACKGROUND: There are serious complications associated with hyaluronic acid (HA) facial injections, including vision impairment due to retinal artery ischemia. In this study, we put forth a clinically relevant model of retinal ischemia and reperfusion in rabbit. We used this to verify the efficacy of hyaluronidase intra-artery thrombolysis in the treatment of hyaluronic acid-induced retinal artery occlusion. METHODS: Retinal artery ischemia was induced by injecting HA into the ophthalmic artery (OA) of adult chinchilla rabbit, and reperfusion was achieved by intra-artery thrombolysis therapy with hyaluronidase following 60 min and 4 h of occlusion. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were used to evaluate blood flow in the retina. Electroretinogram (ERG), hematoxylin and eosin staining and transmission electron microscope were used to evaluate the structure and function of the retina after ischemia and reperfusion following 60 min and 4 h of occlusion. RESULTS: DSA and FFA images confirmed occlusion of the ophthalmic and central retinal arteries, as well as reperfusion after hyaluronidase thrombolysis. ERG indicated retinal dysfunction following ischemia, and thrombolysis partially rescued its impairment following 4 h of occlusion. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and TUNEL staining revealed ischemia-induced histological damages in the retina at different time windows, and hyaluronidase thrombolysis partially mitigated these damages. CONCLUSIONS: We report a method to establish a HA-induced retinal artery occlusion animal model. Hyaluronidase intra-artery thrombolysis was used to recanalize the embolized OA at different time points. Using our method, we achieved retinal reperfusion, and an improvement was observed in the visual function of rabbits after hyaluronidase thrombolysis following 4 h of occlusion. We believe that hyaluronidase intra-artery thrombolysis is an effective method to treat HA-induced retinal artery occlusion in clinic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

IV Thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion - Real-world experience from a comprehensive stroke center.

OBJECTIVES: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a stroke of the retina potentially amenable to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We aimed to determine feasibility of an emergency treatment protocol and risk profile of IVT for CRAO in a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study including patients with acute CRAO admitted to a CSC over 4 years. Patients are offered IVT if they present with acute vision loss of ≤ 20/200 in the affected eye, have no other cause of vision loss (incorporating a dilated ophthalmologic exam), and meet criteria akin to acute ischemic stroke. We collected socio-demographic data, triage data, time from onset to presentation, IVT candidacy, and rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH)- or extracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: 36 patients presented within the study period, mean (standard deviation (SD)) age of 70.7 (10), 52 % female, and median time (Q1, Q3) to ED presentation of 13.5 (4.3, 18.8) h. Patients within 4.5 h from onset presented more commonly directly to our ED (66.6 % vs 37.1 %, p = 0.1). Nine patients (25 %) presented within the 4.5 h window. Of those eligible, 7 (77 %) received IVT. There were no events of intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that IVT for acute CRAO is feasible. We found a high rate of treatment with IVT of those eligible. However, because 75 % of patients presented outside the treatment window, continued educational efforts are needed to improve rapid triage to emergency departments to facilitate evaluation for possible candidacy with IVT.

Network Meta-Analysis of Different Thrombolytic Strategies for the Treatment of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.

PURPOSE: Intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolytic strategies have been used to treat central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO); however, previous meta-analyses evaluated the efficacy of these two thrombolytic strategies separately but did not compare them. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of different thrombolytic methods for treating CRAO. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfangdata to identify relevant studies published before 1 January 2023. We used the "network" command in STATA 14.0 software to perform network meta-analysis. In addition, we calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) to rank all currently available thrombolytic strategies. RESULTS: We included 12 studies in the final data analysis. Results suggested that, compared with standard treatment (ST), intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IVtPA) (OR, 5.78; 95% CI, 2.07 to 16.11) and intra-arterial urokinase (IAUK) (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.10 to 7.02) and intra-arterial tPA (IAtPA) (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.04 to 5.77) achieved better visual improvement. The differences in visual improvement among IVtPA, IAUK, and IAtPA are insignificant. Furthermore, compared with ST, administration of IVtPA within 4.5 hours of CRAO onset (OR, 8.87; 95% CI, 3.35 to 23.48) rather than administration after 4.5 hours of onset (OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 0.81 to 11.70) achieved better visual improvement. In addition, compared to ST, all available thrombolytic strategies we evaluated were associated with a higher risk of adverse events, but these strategies did not differ. Based on the results of SUCRA, IVtPA had the highest ranking probability in visual improvement (91.9%) but had a relatively lower ranking probability of adverse events (60.1%). CONCLUSION: Both intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolytic strategies are effective for treating CRAO, but SUCRA results show that IVtPA may be the optimal strategy for treating CRAO. Furthermore, based on the results of subgroup analysis, we further speculate that IVtPA injection within 4.5 hours of the onset of CRAO should be the optimal thrombolytic option for treating CRAO. However, due to the limitations of all eligible studies, more studies are still required in the future to validate our findings.

Thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion: An individual participant-level meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether thrombolysis improves outcomes in non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (naCRAO) is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the rate of visual recovery after intra-venous thrombolysis (IVT) or intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or urokinase among patients with naCRAO and explore the parameters affecting the final visual acuity (VA). AIM: We systematically searched six databases. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and VA of ⩾20/100 were used to quantify visual recovery. To explore the role of other factors on visual recovery, we defined two models for studies with aggregated data (designs 1 and 2) and 16 models for individual participant data (IPD, models 1-16). SUMMARY OF REVIEW: We included data from 771 patients out of 72 publications in nine languages. Visual improvement for ⩾0.3 logMAR was reported in 74.3% of patients who received IVT-tPA within 4.5 h (CI: 60.9-86.0%; unadjusted rate: 73.2%) and 60.0% of those who received IAT-tPA within 24 h (CI: 49.1-70.5%; unadjusted rate: 59.6%). VA of ⩾20/100 was observed among 39.0% of patients after IVT-tPA within 4.5 h and 21.9% of those with IAT-tPA within 24 h. IPD models highlighted the association between improved visual outcomes and VA at presentation, at least 2 weeks follow-up before reporting the final VA, antiplatelet therapy, and shorter symptom onset to thrombolysis window. CONCLUSION: Early thrombolytic therapy with tPA is associated with enhanced visual recovery in naCRAO. Future studies should refine the optimum time window for thrombolysis in naCRAO.

A case series on treatment of central and branch retinal artery occlusion with intravenous tenecteplase: Tenecteplase for retinal artery occlusions.

OBJECTIVES: Central and branch retinal artery occlusions are disabling ischemic strokes of the retina for which established acute treatments are lacking. This is the first published report of the use of intravenous tenecteplase (TNK) for retinal artery occlusion, in which we describe the clinical course of four patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and one patient with branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were retrospectively recruited to the study from two stroke centers. Clinical course was determined from review of electronic medical records. The primary outcomes of interest were short and long term complications as well as visual acuity at presentation and at any subsequent follow up. RESULTS: There were no hemorrhagic complications. None of the four patients with CRAO experienced functional visual recovery (defined as improvement to 20/100 or better). The patient with BRAO had functional visual recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous TNK may be a safe and reasonable treatment for CRAO and BRAO.

Improved visual outcomes of central retinal artery occlusion with local intra-arterial fibrinolysis beyond the conventional time window.

Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) is a promising therapeutic option for CRAO. However, the narrow time window of 6 h has greatly limited the application of LIF. In this study, we explored the efficacy of LIF beyond the conventional time windows and compared the result with conservative therapy. This prospective study included 179 CRAO patients with baseline visual acuity (VA) ≤ 20/400 treated at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The mean time from vision loss to presentation was 5.5 days. 58 patients received conventional standard therapy (CST) alone.121 patients underwent LIF. Main outcome was VA improvement ≥ 0.3 logMAR. Secondary outcome was a favorable VA outcome of 20/200 or better. Logistic regressions were performed to identify predictors of visual improvement. 43% patients in the LIF group experienced VA improvement versus 19% with CST (P = 0.002). LIF was associated with 4.0-fold higher likelihood of visual improvement compared to CST (P = 0.001). Poor baseline VA (light perception or no light perception) and shortened prothrombin time (PT) were associated with greater chance of visual improvement with LIF. However, LIF showed no significant advantage over CST for favorable VA outcomes. No major complications occurred. LIF beyond the therapeutic time window improved vision in functionally blind CRAO patients and showed better efficacy when compared with CST. PT may be a potential predictor of visual outcome after LIF. Our findings could complement existing time-based treatment guidelines and potentially allow for personalized decisions on the use of LIF beyond time windows.

Long-term outcomes of intravenous fibrinolysis in central retinal artery occlusion.

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an ophthalmologic emergency that can lead to irreversible loss of vision. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has been used experimentally for its treatment. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of emergency IVT on CRAO and its impact on visual acuity outcomes. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with CRAO. A total of 46 patients with CRAO were analysed; 16 patients received IVT treatment (IVT group) while 30 did not (no-IVT group). Seven patients from the IVT group received IVT early, within 4.5 hours (h) after the onset of symptoms (early-IVT), and 9 patients received it beyond this timeframe (late-IVT). The median time-to-hospital was 8.5 h: 3 h for the IVT group and 24 h for the no-IVT group. The median time-to-treatment was 5 h. The median outcome of visual acuity was 0.05 in the early-IVT, 0.025 in the late-IVT, and 0.01 in the no-IVT group. Among patients who received IVT early, 86% exhibited significant visual improvement. This improvement was four-fold greater compared to all other groups (p = 0.040), including the late-IVT (p = 0.011) and no-IVT groups (p = 0.023). No complications of the treatment were reported. Our study confirms that the administration of IVT treatment for CRAO within the 4.5-h time window is both safe and effective.

Hemorrhagic retinal arterial macroaneurysm combined with branch retinal artery occlusion treated with intravitreal conbercept injection: A case report.

RATIONALE: Branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) is a rare complication of retinal arterial macroaneurysm (RAM), a low-incidence ocular disease. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 75-year-old woman presented with a chief complaint of blurred vision. DIAGNOSES: The patient for 4 days received a diagnosis of RAM combined with BRAO. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with two successive intravitreal conbercept injections. OUTCOMES: The patient's best-corrected visual acuity improved, and the RAM diminished. LESSONS: Administration of conbercept injection might be an effective treatment for complex RAM with BRAO.

Retinal stroke: research models, targets and experimental drugs.

INTRODUCTION: Retinal artery occlusion (RAO), often caused by a microembolus and resulting in inner retinal ischemia, could be considered as the retinal analog to cerebral stroke. Although several therapeutic targets have been suggested in animal models of retinal ischemia and several potential treatments have been evaluated on small series of patients, central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is still rarely treatable in clinical practice. AREAS COVERED: Here, we review several animal models of RAO, including increased intraocular pressure, laser, vasoconstriction, embolization and clamp. We also review the pathogenic mechanisms that contribute to cell death cascades during ischemia, and the therapeutic strategies targeting these events. These strategies aim to restore blood flow by fibrinolysis, increase the oxygen or glucose supply, decrease the energy demands, restrict ionic leak fluxes or reduce the detrimental effects of glutamate, calcium and free radicals. The current literature suggests that tPA treatment could be effective for CRAO. EXPERT OPINION: Eye care professionals must make a rapid and accurate diagnosis and immediately refer patients with acute retinal stroke to specialized centers. CRAO management should also be facilitated by developing local networks to encourage collaboration among ophthalmologists, retina specialists and stroke neurologists.

Statin Treatment on Cardiovascular Risk After Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Historical Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a major cause of acute visual loss and patients with RAO have an increased risk for subsequent cardiovascular events. However, there is little evidence of whether the use of statins is associated with the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with RAO. We investigated whether statin treatment in patients with RAO is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events. METHODS: This study was a historical cohort study with nested case-control analysis. Using the nationwide health insurance claims database in Korea, we retrospectively established a cohort of newly diagnosed RAO patients without prior cardiovascular events between January 2008 and March 2020. We defined the case group as those who had cardiovascular events (stroke or myocardial infarction) and the control group as RAO patients without primary outcome matched by sex, age, comorbidities, and duration of follow-up (1:2 incidence density sampling). Conditional logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Among 13,843 patients newly diagnosed with RAO, 1030 patients had cardiovascular events (mean follow-up period of 6.4 ± 3.7 years). A total of 957 cases were matched to 1914 controls. Throughout the study period, the proportion of patients taking statin was less than half. Statin treatment after RAO was associated with a low risk of cardiovascular events (adjusted OR, 0.637; 95% CI 0.520-0.780; P < 0.001). A longer duration of statin exposure was associated with a lower cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed RAO, treatment with statins, particularly long-term use, was associated with a low risk of future cardiovascular events.

Safety and effectiveness of IV Thrombolysis in retinal artery occlusion: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) may lead to irreversible blindness. For acute RAO, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) can be considered as treatment. However, due to the rarity of RAO, data about IVT safety and effectiveness is limited. METHODS: From the multicenter database ThRombolysis for Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP), we retrospectively analyzed visual acuity (VA) at baseline and within 3 months in IVT and non-IVT treated RAO patients. Primary outcome was difference of VA between baseline and follow up (∆VA). Secondary outcomes were rates of visual recovery (defined as improvement of VA ⩾ 0.3 logMAR), and safety (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to ECASS II criteria, asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and major extracranial bleeding). Statistical analysis was performed using parametric tests and a linear regression model adjusted for age, sex and baseline VA. RESULTS: We screened 200 patients with acute RAO and included 47 IVT and 34 non-IVT patients with complete information about recovery of vision. Visual Acuity at follow up significantly improved compared to baseline in IVT patients (∆VA 0.5 ± 0.8, p < 0.001) and non-IVT patients (∆VA 0.40 ± 1.1, p < 0.05). No significant differences in ∆VA and visual recovery rate were found between groups at follow up. Two asymptomatic ICH (4%) and one (2%) major extracranial bleeding (intraocular bleeding) occurred in the IVT group, while no bleeding events were reported in the non-IVT group. CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-life data from the largest cohort of IVT treated RAO patients published so far. While there is no evidence for superiority of IVT compared to conservative treatment, bleeding rates were low. A randomized controlled trial and standardized outcome assessments in RAO patients are justified to assess the net benefit of IVT in RAO.

Visual Recovery in 2 Cases of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Treated With Prompt Intra-ophthalmic Artery Fibrinolysis.

BACKGROUND: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) rapidly produces inner retinal ischemia and irreversible vision loss. Although many therapeutic interventions have been proposed, no interventions have proven effective in restoring vision in large randomized controlled trials and final visual outcome in most patients is very poor. METHODS: Retrospective case series. RESULTS: We describe 2 cases of CRAO occurring after uncomplicated cataract surgery under topical anesthesia and rapidly diagnosed. Both had very severe vision loss at presentation with dramatic improvement after intra-ophthalmic artery fibrinolysis administered 2.75 and 5.5 hours after symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: Sudden monocular vision loss is an ophthalmologic emergency as CRAO must be ruled out and if diagnosed, rapid intervention should be performed. Devastating vision loss can be prevented if interventional neuroradiology is trained and available on a 24-hour basis for administration of local intra-arterial thrombolysis.