Brentuximab Vedotin Retreatment in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma or Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective United States Claims Analysis.

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) monotherapy (BV-M) and combination (BV-C) therapies are safe and effective for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). Although the sample sizes have been small (12-29 patients), in clinical studies, response rates of 53-88% have been reported for BV retreatment in patients with an initial BV response. We evaluated the real-world characteristics and treatment patterns of cHL/PTCL patients who received BV and were retreated in the United States. Symphony Health Patient Claims (11/2013-1/2022) were retrospectively analyzed to identify cHL/PTCL patients treated with BV and retreated with BV-M, BV-C, or non-BV therapy. Patient characteristics were described by retreatment, and predictors of BV-M retreatment were identified. Among the cHL and PTCL patients treated with BV (n = 6442 and 2472, respectively), 13% and 12%, respectively, were retreated with BV; the median times from initial BV to BV-M retreatment were 5 and 7 months, respectively; and the numbers of BV-M retreatment doses were 4 and 5, respectively. Among cHL patients, the predictors of BV-M retreatment were age (18-39 vs. ≥60 years), sex (women vs. men), and previous stem cell transplantation (yes vs. no). Among PTCL patients, the only predictor of BV-M retreatment was systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma subtype (yes vs. no). Real-world data support clinical study results suggesting earlier BV treatment be considered, as BV retreatment may be an option.

A critical analysis of the decreasing trends in tuberculosis cure indicators in Brazil, 2001-2022.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the temporal trend of tuberculosis cure indicators in Brazil. METHODS: An ecological time-series study using administrative data of reported cases of the disease nationwide between 2001 and 2022. We estimated cure indicators for each federative unit (FU) considering individuals with pulmonary tuberculosis, tuberculosis-HIV coinfection, and those in tuberculosis retreatment. We used regression models using joinpoint regression for trend analysis, reporting the annual percentage change and the average annual percentage change. RESULTS: For the three groups analyzed, we observed heterogeneity in the annual percentage change in the Brazilian FUs, with a predominance of significantly decreasing trends in the cure indicator in most FUs, especially at the end of the time series. When considering national indicators, an average annual percentage change of -0.97% (95% CI: -1.23 to -0.74) was identified for the cure of people with pulmonary tuberculosis, of -1.11% (95% CI: -1.42 to -0.85) for the cure of people with tuberculosis-HIV coinfection, and of -1.44% (95% CI: -1.62 to -1.31) for the cure of people in tuberculosis retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: The decreasing trends of cure indicators in Brazil are concerning and underscore a warning to public authorities, as it points to the possible occurrence of other treatment outcomes, such as treatment discontinuity and death. This finding contradicts current public health care policies and requires urgent strategies aiming to promote follow-up of patients during tuberculosis treatment in Brazil.

Frequency of apical periodontitis in root-filled teeth restored with post and core: A 5-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In conjunction with post placement in root-filled teeth with periapical healthy conditions, root canal retreatment may be performed to improve the seal of the root canal. Whether root canal retreatment for technical reasons (retreatments in teeth without apical periodontitis (AP)) results in lower frequency of AP is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there is a difference in frequency of AP between roots with root canals retreated for technical reasons, and roots with root canals not retreated before post placement, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Also, to examine changes in root filling quality following root canal retreatment for technical reasons. METHODS: This retrospective study included radiographs of 441 root-filled roots without periapical radiolucencies at baseline, scheduled for post and core treatment. Follow-up data for a minimum of 5 years were available for 305 roots (loss to follow-up 30.8%), 46 of which were retreated for technical reasons. Two calibrated observers assessed root filling sealing quality and length, respectively, and periapical status according to the Periapical Index. The main outcome of the study, AP, was used as the dependent variable and all analyses were performed at root level. RESULTS: The overall frequency of AP at follow-up was 13.8%. The difference in frequency of AP between retreated (4.3%) and nonretreated (15.4%) root canals was not statistically significant, p = .061. Analyses including only roots with preoperatively inadequate root filling quality showed a statistically significant difference (p = .017) between the two treatment groups (2.4% vs. 22.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Root canal retreatment for technical reasons before post and core placement significantly reduces the frequency of AP in roots with inadequate root filling quality.

Reinterventions After CoreValve/Evolut Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Data on valve reintervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are limited. OBJECTIVES: The authors compared the 5-year incidence of valve reintervention after self-expanding CoreValve/Evolut TAVR vs SAVR. METHODS: Pooled data from CoreValve and Evolut R/PRO (Medtronic) randomized trials and single-arm studies encompassed 5,925 TAVR (4,478 CoreValve and 1,447 Evolut R/PRO) and 1,832 SAVR patients. Reinterventions were categorized by indication, timing, and treatment. The cumulative incidence of reintervention was compared between TAVR vs SAVR, Evolut vs CoreValve, and Evolut vs SAVR. RESULTS: There were 99 reinterventions (80 TAVR and 19 SAVR). The cumulative incidence of reintervention through 5 years was higher with TAVR vs SAVR (2.2% vs 1.5%; P = 0.017), with differences observed early (≤1 year; adjusted subdistribution HR: 3.50; 95% CI: 1.53-8.02) but not from >1 to 5 years (adjusted subdistribution HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.48-2.28). The most common reason for reintervention was paravalvular regurgitation after TAVR and endocarditis after SAVR. Evolut had a significantly lower incidence of reintervention than CoreValve (0.9% vs 1.6%; P = 0.006) at 5 years with differences observed early (adjusted subdistribution HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12-0.73) but not from >1 to 5 years (adjusted subdistribution HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.21-1.74). The 5-year incidence of reintervention was similar for Evolut vs SAVR (0.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: A low incidence of reintervention was observed for CoreValve/Evolut R/PRO and SAVR through 5 years. Reintervention occurred most often at ≤1 year for TAVR and >1 year for SAVR. Most early reinterventions were with the first-generation CoreValve and managed percutaneously. Reinterventions were more common following CoreValve TAVR compared with Evolut TAVR or SAVR.

Long-term functional outcomes and surgical retreatment after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: A 10-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the 10-year functional outcomes (primary) and frequency and predictors of BPH surgical retreatment (secondary) after ThuLEP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing ThuLEP between 2010 and 2013 was performed. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 40 years, prostate volume (PV) ≥ 80 mL, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)-Total score ≥ 8 points. IPSS-Total score was the primary outcome, and BPH surgical retreatment rate was the secondary outcome. Paired t-test, McNemar test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of surgical retreatment. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients with a mean ±SD age of 63.9 ± 9.7 years and a PV of 115.6 ± 28.6 mL were included. Mean ±SD follow-up was 108.2 ± 29.6 months. IPSS-Total score was significantly improved at 1 year compared to baseline (23.3 ± 4.7 vs. 10.3 ± 3.8; p<0.001). It was similar after 5 years (10.5 ± 3.6 vs. 10.7 ± 5.0; p=0.161), with a significant worsening at 10 years (10.3 ±4.8 vs. 13.8 ±4.5; p=0.042) but remaining statistically and clinically better than baseline (13.8 ±4.5 vs. 22.1 ±4.3; p<0.001). After 10 years, 21 (5.9%) patients had undergone BPH reoperation. Baseline PV (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.41; p<0.001) and time from BPH surgery (adjusted OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15-1.43; p<0.001) were predictors of BPH surgical retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: ThuLEP is associated with optimal functional outcomes and a low frequency of BPH surgical retreatment in the long-term. Baseline PV and time from surgery were predictors of BPH reoperation.

[Clear aligner in orthodontic retreatment].

Improper diagnosis and design, misusing orthodontic technique, relapse after orthodontic treatment, and poor patient compliance may lead to treatment failure, requiring orthodontic retreatment. While in such cases, patients usually have already had their teeth extracted, or are with periodontal, joint, and other dental problems, which often require multidisciplinary treatment. The retreatment of orthodontic patients is difficult, and the treatment options are limited. The characteristics of clear aligner treatment, such as comfortable and beautiful appearance, high degree of digital precision, and personalized tooth arrangement to simulate the final outcome, make it popular in the orthodontic retreatment. This article discusses and summarizes the details of orthodontic design, case monitoring, and the application of clear aligner in orthodontic retreatment of failed cases. Before starting treatment, the difficulty assessment tool (clear aligner treatment complexity assessment tool) can be used to evaluate the difficulty of clear aligner treatment. Orthodontists are recommended to treat orthodontic patients with clear aligners within their ability to avoid treatment failure. The key to the success of the extraction case treatment with clear aligner is to make the correct diagnosis and select the right cases. In the treatment planning, attention should be paid to the restoration of anterior tooth torque, making good use of molar distalization to obtain the space, vertical control, and improving posterior tooth relationship. Proper selection of cases and reasonable design in clear aligner treatment are expected to obtain tooth alignment, good intercuspation, normal overbite and overjet, periodontal health, parallel roots, and to achieve the goal of aesthetic, functional, stable, and healthy orthodontic treatment.

Managing Endodontic Complications: The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Flare-ups.

At its core, endodontics is a specialty centered on saving patients' teeth. Nonsurgical root canal therapy and nonsurgical retreatment, arguably the "bread and butter" of endodontics, not only facilitate the preservation of the natural dentition, but in many cases, alleviate pain. Most patients arrive for endodontic treatment expecting symptom relief. A small percentage of these patients, however, experience just the opposite. Within 48 to 72 hours, these select patients experience worsening symptoms, including swelling and pain, and may wonder what mishaps may have occurred during their treatment. These symptom exacerbations are referred to as endodontic flare-ups and are well-documented in the literature. In most cases their occurrence does not reflect a lack of practitioner judgment or skill, but rather a biologic event resulting from a shift in the delicate balance of the bacterial communities and inflammatory events at the periapex. This article reviews the pathophysiology and treatment of endodontic flare-ups, thereby informing patient communication strategies surrounding these events, to preserve both the teeth in question as well as patient relationships.

Effectiveness and Safety of Retreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE in Patients with Progressive Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Real-World Study in the United States.

Advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are associated with a poor prognosis. A regimen of 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to improve both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced NETs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the United States to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of additional cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with progressive NETs. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of adults with advanced NETs. The patients had undergone initial treatment with up to 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE and, after disease progression and a period of at least 6 mo since the end of the initial treatment, were retreated with at least 1 additional cycle at a single center (2010-2020). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were evaluated descriptively. Response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1; toxicity was defined using criteria from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to evaluate PFS and OS. Results: Of the 31 patients who received 177Lu-DOTATATE retreatment, 61% were male and 94% were White. Overall, patients received a median of 6 cycles (4 initial cycles and 2 retreatment cycles), and the mean administered activity was 41.9 GBq. Two patients also went on to receive additional retreatment (1 and 2 cycles, individually) after a second period of at least 6 mo and progression after retreatment. Best responses of partial response and stable disease were observed in 35% and 65% of patients after the initial treatment and 23% and 45% of patients after retreatment, respectively. The median PFS after the initial treatment was 20.2 mo and after retreatment was 9.6 mo. The median OS after the initial treatment was 42.6 mo and after retreatment was 12.6 mo. Hematologic parameters decreased significantly during both the initial treatment and retreatment but recovered such that there was little difference between the values before the initial treatment and before the retreatment. Clinically significant hematotoxicity occurred in 1 and 3 patients after the initial treatment and retreatment, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 nephrotoxicity was observed. Conclusion: Retreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE after progression appeared to be well tolerated and offered disease control in patients with progressive NETs after initial 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment.

Comparing reactivation and retreatment for three doses of bevacizumab in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE: To determine timing and rates of reactivation and retreatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after treatment with either 0.125 mg, 0.250 mg, or 0.500 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). METHODS: Retrospective data, including demographic information, past medical history, and ROP characteristics were analyzed for babies with type 1 ROP treated with IVB at Riley Hospital for Children for the perioed 2014-2021. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients met inclusion criteria: 29 patients received 0.125 mg of IVB; 39, 0.250 mg; and 16, 0.500 mg. Of the 84, 67 (80%) had additional laser treatment because of late reactivation (n = 52) or persistent avascular retina (PAR) (n = 15). Subsequent laser treatment was more common with lower doses: 0.125 mg (n = 27 [93%]); 0.250 mg (n = 31 [80%]); 0.500 mg (n = 9 [57%]) (P = 0.012). There was no difference between groups with regard to reason for subsequent laser treatment (reactivation vs PAR). The 0.125 mg group required retreatment because of reactivation 3.8 weeks sooner than the other dosing groups (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes comparing three doses of IVB for severe ROP showed a difference in the timing of secondary treatment, with the lower dosing group requiring laser for reactivation earlier.

Retreatment with HBV siRNA Results in Additional Reduction in HBV Antigenemia and Immune Stimulation in the AAV-HBV Mouse Model.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment with siRNAs that target HBV has demonstrated robust declines in HBV antigens. This effect is also observed in the AAV-HBV mouse model, which was used to investigate if two cycles of GalNAc-HBV-siRNA treatment could induce deeper declines in HBsAg levels or prevent rebound, and to provide insights into the liver immune microenvironment. METHODS: C57Bl/6 mice were transduced with one of two different titers of AAV-HBV for 28 days, resulting in stable levels of HBsAg of about 103 or 105 IU/mL. Mice were treated for 12 weeks (four doses q3wk) per cycle with 3 mg/kg of siRNA-targeting HBV or an irrelevant sequence either once (single treatment) or twice (retreatment) with an 8-week treatment pause in between. Blood was collected to evaluate viral parameters. Nine weeks after the last treatment, liver samples were collected to perform phenotyping, bulk RNA-sequencing, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Independent of HBsAg baseline levels, treatment with HBV-siRNA induced a rapid decline in HBsAg levels, which then plateaued before gradually rebounding 12 weeks after treatment stopped. A second cycle of HBV-siRNA treatment induced a further decline in HBsAg levels in serum and the liver, reaching undetectable levels and preventing rebound when baseline levels were 103 IU/mL. This was accompanied with a significant increase in inflammatory macrophages in the liver and significant upregulation of regulatory T-cells and T-cells expressing immune checkpoint receptors. CONCLUSIONS: Retreatment induced an additional decline in HBsAg levels, reaching undetectable levels when baseline HBsAg levels were 3log10 or less. This correlated with T-cell activation and upregulation of Trem2.

Salvage therapies including retreatment with BCMA-directed approaches after BCMA CAR-T relapses for multiple myeloma.

ABSTRACT: For patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with a relapse after B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), optimal salvage treatment strategies remain unclear. BCMA-directed CAR-T and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are now commercially available, and the outcomes for retreatment with BCMA-directed approaches are not well studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of 68 patients with relapsed disease after BCMA-directed CAR-T to evaluate outcomes and responses to salvage therapies. With a median follow-up of 13.5 months, median overall survival from time of relapse until death was 18 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2 to not reached [NR]). Fifty-eight patients received subsequent myeloma-directed therapies, with a total of 265 lines of therapy (LOTs). The overall response rate for firstline salvage therapy was 41% (95% CI, 28-55). Among all LOTs, high response rates were observed among those receiving another BCMA-directed CAR-T (89%), BCMA-directed BsAbs (60%), CD38-directed combinations (80% when combined with BsAb; 50% when combined with immunomodulatory drugs and/or proteasome inhibitors), and alkylator-combinations (50% overall; 69% with high-dose alkylators). Thirty-four patients received at least 1 line of salvage BCMA-directed therapy; median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.9 to NR), 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.4 to NR), and 1 month (95% CI, 0.9 to NR) with median duration of response (DOR) of 8 months, 4.4 months, and 2.8 months for subsequent BCMA-directed CAR-T, BsAb, and belantamab mafadotin, respectively. Retreatment with BCMA-directed CAR-T and BsAbs can be effective salvage options after BCMA-directed CAR-T relapse; however, DORs appear limited, and further studies with new combinations and alternative targets are warranted.

Incidence of Middle Mesial Canals in Mandibular Molars during Root Canal Treatment and Nonsurgical Retreatment.

INTRODUCTION: Large-scale clinical studies on the incidence of middle mesial canals (MMCs) in nonsurgical root canal treatment (RCT) and retreatment of mandibular molars are lacking. The primary aim of this observational study was to determine the incidence of MMCs in mandibular first and second molars that received RCT or nonsurgical retreatment (NSRetx). The secondary aim was to determine factors associated with incidence of MMCs. METHODS: Included were 3018 mandibular molars that received RCT (n = 1624) or NSRetx (n = 1394) by 3 endodontists in a private practice. Demographic and procedural data were collected. Bivariate and multivariable (Poisson regression model) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Incidence of MMCs was 8.8% (n = 267). Although the bivariate analysis showed that NSRetx was significantly associated with incidence of MMCs, this association did not reach the threshold for statistical significance after controlling for all covariates (P = .07). Multivariable analysis on the entire cohort showed that incidence of MMCs was significantly associated with younger age (risk ratio [RR] = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.06), male gender (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.85), preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.17-1.89), and first molar (RR = 2.30; 95% CI:1.74-3.05). Subgroup multivariable analyses revealed that incidence of MMCs was associated with male gender only in the RCT group (RR = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.55-3.30) but not in the NSRetx group (RR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82, 1.50); and with preoperative CBCT only in the NSRetx group (RR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.28, 2.50) but not in the RCT group (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.71, 1.69). Associations with younger age and first molar remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Overall incidence of MMCs was 8.8%. Incidence of MMCs was significantly higher in younger patients and in mandibular first molars but was not associated with the type of treatment.

Further Interventions after Root Canal Treatment Are Most Common in Molars and Teeth Restored with Direct Restorations: A 10-11-Year Follow-Up of the Adult Swedish Population.

INTRODUCTION: The aims were to investigate 1) the frequency of nonsurgical retreatment, root-end surgery, extraction, and further restorative treatment during a follow-up of 10-11 years after root filling and compare the frequencies according to tooth group and type of coronal restoration and 2) the timing of nonsurgical retreatment, root-end surgery, and extraction. METHODS: Data were collected from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency's register. A search for treatment codes identified teeth root filled in 2009 and the type of coronal restoration (direct, indirect, and unspecified) registered within 6 months of root filling. The root-filled teeth were followed 10-11 years, and further interventions were recorded. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In 2009, root fillings were registered for 215,611 individuals/teeth. Nonsurgical retreatment, root-end surgery, and extraction were undertaken in 3.5%, 1.4%, and 20% teeth, respectively. The frequency of further interventions varied with respect to tooth group and type of coronal restoration, but only slightly for endodontic retreatments. Further interventions, except for root-end surgery, were registered more often for molars and directly restored teeth (P < .001). The majority of endodontic retreatments were undertaken within 4 years, while extractions were evenly distributed over 10-11 years. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency numbers of nonsurgical retreatment and root-end surgery were low, despite 1 in 5 root-filled teeth registered as extracted. Further interventions were most common in molars and directly restored teeth. Endodontic retreatments were performed more often during the first 4 years.

Clinical and Radiographic Failure of Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment and Retreatment Using Single-cone Technique With Calcium Silicate-based Sealers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic failure of nonsurgical endodontic treatment and retreatment for mature permanent teeth with or without apical periodontitis using the single-cone (SC) obturation technique with calcium silicate-based bio-ceramic (CSBC) sealers and to compare these failure rates to other sealer materials and obturation techniques. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and gray literature up to March 2023. Two reviewers assessed the eligibility of the included studies. Eligible studies were critically appraised for risk of bias and quality of evidence. Subsequently, a meta-analysis of pooled data was conducted utilizing the RevMan software (P < .05) to evaluate the failure rate of non-surgical root canal therapy using CSBC sealers and SC obturation procedures. Separately, another analysis was conducted to compare those results with the outcome of nonsurgical root canal therapy using alternative obturation materials and methods. RESULTS: Five studies were included. The pooled failure rate for nonsurgical endodontic treatment and retreatment combined using CSBC sealers and SC obturation technique was 6.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) = (3%-12%), I2 = 46%]. A second analysis was conducted on the 3 included clinical trials to compare the outcomes of the intervention (CSBC sealers and SC obturation technique) and control groups (other sealers and other obturation techniques). This analysis found no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding clinical and radiographic failure of endodontic treatment and retreatment [Risk ratio = 0.71, 95% CI = (0.33, 1.51), I2 = 0]. This difference was also not statistically significant when the failure rate of primary root canal treatment and retreatment were separately analyzed [Combined Risk ratio of primary root canal treatment = 0.94, 95% CI = (0.46, 1.93), I2 = 0%; Combined Risk ratio of retreatment = 0.21, 95% CI = (0.001, 75.46), I2 = 0%]. CONCLUSIONS: The overall results of this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that the SC obturation technique with CSBC sealer provides similar results compared to other obturation materials and techniques in facilitating the healing of apical periodontitis.

Expert consensus on difficulty assessment of endodontic therapy.

Endodontic diseases are a kind of chronic infectious oral disease. Common endodontic treatment concepts are based on the removal of inflamed or necrotic pulp tissue and the replacement by gutta-percha. However, it is very essential for endodontic treatment to debride the root canal system and prevent the root canal system from bacterial reinfection after root canal therapy (RCT). Recent research, encompassing bacterial etiology and advanced imaging techniques, contributes to our understanding of the root canal system's anatomy intricacies and the technique sensitivity of RCT. Success in RCT hinges on factors like patients, infection severity, root canal anatomy, and treatment techniques. Therefore, improving disease management is a key issue to combat endodontic diseases and cure periapical lesions. The clinical difficulty assessment system of RCT is established based on patient conditions, tooth conditions, root canal configuration, and root canal needing retreatment, and emphasizes pre-treatment risk assessment for optimal outcomes. The findings suggest that the presence of risk factors may correlate with the challenge of achieving the high standard required for RCT. These insights contribute not only to improve education but also aid practitioners in treatment planning and referral decision-making within the field of endodontics.

Reprint of: The Effect of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Obturation Levels on the Outcome of Endodontic Retreatment: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: No clinical studies have examined the effect of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) obturation levels on the outcome of endodontic retreatment. This retrospective study examined treatment outcomes in three cohorts that compared overfilling, flush filling, and underfilling after orthograde retreatment using MTA. METHODS: Two hundred fifty patients with 264 teeth diagnosed with previously treated root canals and apical periodontitis retreated in a private endodontic practice were included. All teeth received MTA obturation and the extent of the final filling level was measured in relation to the major apical foramen. After 6-month follow-ups, all nonhealing cases were treated surgically. After 24- to 72-month reviews, the effect of preoperative lesion size and the degree of MTA obturation level were assessed. Multiple linear regression and time-to-event analysis using Stata 17 software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX) were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Within the three cohorts, 99 out of 108 overfilled teeth (91.7%), 90 out of 103 flush fills (87.4%), and 10 out of 53 underfilled teeth (18.9%) healed and were successfully retreated without surgery at 48-months. When surgical outcomes were included, the combined healed proportion was 93.2%. Preoperative lesion size was found to be an important predictor for retreatment nonhealing. A 1-mm increase in lesion size at baseline resulted in an estimated 11% (95% CI 1.04, 1.18)-38% (95% CI 1.22, 1.58) increase in the risk of surgery. Compared to overfilling and flush filling, underfilling was associated with an approximately three-fold increase in requiring surgery and characterized by delayed healing. CONCLUSION: MTA obturation is a viable retreatment option for teeth with nonhealing endodontic treatment. MTA overfills or flush fillings do not adversely affect healing outcomes. However, MTA underfilling increases the chances for nonhealing and surgical intervention.

Efficacy and safety of daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone versus daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in daratumumab-naïve relapsed multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to analyze the safety and efficacy of DPd versus DKd in daratumumab naïve RRMM patients treated in real-world practice. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients with RRMM were included in the analysis; 128 patients received DPd, and 59 patients received DKd. A vast majority (80%) of patients had lenalidomide refractory disease and nearly 50% had bortezomib refractory disease. The overall response and complete response rates were 76% and 34% in the DPd group versus 80% and 51% in the DKd group, respectively. With a median follow up of 36 months for the entire patient population, median PFS and OS in the DPd versus DKd groups were 12, 12, 37, and 35 months, respectively. The most common grade 3+ adverse events in the DPd versus DKd groups were neutropenia (32% vs. 7%), anemia (14% vs. 10%), thrombocytopenia (13% vs. 15%), and cardiovascular events (4% vs. 15%), respectively. Both DPd and DKd appeared to be a safe and effective treatment options for RRMM. CONCLUSIONS: While there were more cytopenias associated with DPd and more cardiovascular side effects with DKd, there were no significant differences in the survival outcomes with these two regimens.