Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(11): 925-39, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26486979

ABSTRACT

GLOBAL IMPORTANCE: The two feline retroviruses, feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukaemia virus (FeLV), are global and widespread, but differ in their potential to cause disease. VIRAL INFECTION - FIV: FIV, a lentivirus that shares many properties with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), can cause an acquired immune deficiency syndrome, which predisposes cats to other infections, stomatitis, neurological disorders and tumours. Although secondary infections are common, specific opportunistic infections or acquired immunodeficiency virus-defining infections, such as those that occur with HIV, are not commonly reported in FIV-infected cats. In most naturally infected cats, FIV does not cause a severe clinical syndrome; with appropriate care, FIV-infected cats can live many years before succumbing to conditions unrelated to their FIV infection. Thus, overall survival time is not necessarily shorter than in uninfected cats, and quality of life is usually high over many years or lifelong. VIRAL INFECTION - FELV: FeLV, an oncornavirus, is more pathogenic than FIV. Historically, it was considered to account for more disease-related deaths and clinical syndromes in cats than any other infectious agent. Recently, the prevalence and importance of FeLV have been decreasing, mainly because of testing and eradication programmes and the use of FeLV vaccines. Progressive FeLV infection can cause tumours, bone marrow suppression and immunosuppression, as well as neurological and other disorders, and leads to a decrease in life expectancy. However, with appropriate care, many FeLV-infected cats can also live several years with a good quality of life. PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: A decision regarding treatment or euthanasia should never be based solely on the presence or absence of a retrovirus infection. Antiviral chemotherapy is of increasing interest in veterinary medicine, but is still not used commonly. EVIDENCE BASE: This article reviews the current literature on antiviral chemotherapy in retrovirus-infected cats, focusing on drugs that are currently available on the market and, thus, could potentially be used in cats.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Feline Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Retroviridae Proteins, Oncogenic/therapeutic use , Vaccination/veterinary , Viral Vaccines/therapeutic use , Animals , Cats , Feline Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/diagnosis , Feline Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/pathology , Immunodeficiency Virus, Feline/isolation & purification , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
Vaccine ; 33(13): 1578-85, 2015 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25698488

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic vaccinations have a potential application in infections where no curative treatment is available. In contrast to HIV, efficacious vaccines for a cat retrovirus, feline leukemia virus (FeLV), are commercially available. However, the infection is still prevalent, and no effective treatment of the infection is known. By vaccinating persistently FeLV-infected cats and presenting FeLV antigens to the immune system of the host, e.g., in the form of recombinant and/or adjuvanted antigens, we intended to shift the balance toward an advantage of the host so that persistent infection could be overcome by the infected cat. Two commercially available FeLV vaccines efficacious in protecting naïve cats from FeLV infection were tested in six experimentally and persistently FeLV-infected cats: first, a canarypox-vectored vaccine, and second, an adjuvanted, recombinant envelope vaccine was repeatedly administered with the aim to stimulate the immune system. No beneficial effects on p27 antigen and plasma viral RNA loads, anti-FeLV antibodies, or life expectancy of the cats were detected. The cats were unable to overcome or decrease viremia. Some cats developed antibodies to FeLV antigens although not protective. Thus, we cannot recommend vaccinating persistently FeLV-infected cats as a means of improving their FeLV status, quality of life or life expectancy. We suggest testing of all cats for FeLV infection prior to FeLV vaccination.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases/therapy , Leukemia Virus, Feline/immunology , Retroviridae Infections/veterinary , Retroviridae Proteins, Oncogenic/therapeutic use , Tumor Virus Infections/veterinary , Vaccines, Synthetic/therapeutic use , Viral Vaccines/therapeutic use , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Cat Diseases/virology , Cats , Gene Products, gag/blood , Leukemia Virus, Feline/pathogenicity , Life Expectancy , Quality of Life , Retroviridae Infections/therapy , Retroviridae Infections/virology , Retroviridae Proteins, Oncogenic/administration & dosage , Tumor Virus Infections/therapy , Tumor Virus Infections/virology , Vaccination/veterinary , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Viral Load , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Viremia/therapy , Viremia/veterinary
3.
Vaccine ; 9(2): 89-96, 1991 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1647576

ABSTRACT

A recombinant retroviral subunit vaccine has been developed that successfully protects cats from infectious feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) challenge. The antigen used is a non-glycosylated protein derived from the envelope glycoprotein of FeLV subgroup A, expressed in Escherichia coli. This recombinant protein, rgp70D, includes the entire exterior envelope protein gp70, plus the first 34 amino acids from the transmembrane protein p15E. The vaccine consists of purified rgp70D absorbed on to aluminium hydroxide and used in conjunction with a novel saponin adjuvant. Cats immunized with this formulation developed a strong humoral immune response, including neutralizing and feline oncornavirus-associated cell membrane antigen antibodies. Vaccinated animals showed an anamnestic response upon intraperitoneal challenge with FeLV-A, and were protected from viral infection. In contrast, the control animals developed viraemia shortly after the challenge, which in most cases became chronic. Formulation of the same antigen with other widely used adjuvants elicited poor protective immune responses in cats.


Subject(s)
Leukemia Virus, Feline/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/therapeutic use , Viral Vaccines/therapeutic use , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/biosynthesis , Cats , Genetic Engineering , Leukemia Virus, Feline/genetics , Leukemia, Experimental/immunology , Leukemia, Experimental/prevention & control , Mice , Retroviridae Proteins, Oncogenic/genetics , Retroviridae Proteins, Oncogenic/immunology , Retroviridae Proteins, Oncogenic/isolation & purification , Retroviridae Proteins, Oncogenic/therapeutic use , Saponins/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...