The Male Eyebrow and Eyelid: An Anthropometric Analysis of White Professional Models.

BACKGROUND: Surgical lift of eyebrows is one of the most efficient facial rejuvenation methods. Although the popularity of those procedures seems to be increasing among men, little is known about aesthetically pleasant male eyebrow shape and position. METHODS: Semiautomatic photogrammetric analysis of 300 professional White male models of assumed age (18 to 39 years old) was performed. The assessment was conducted in two sessions, using A.I.D. software. A set of linear, angular, and surface area morphometric parameters of the periorbital region was measured. RESULTS: A total of 600 periorbital regions were quantitatively evaluated. Statistical analysis showed high interrater reliability for all three types of measurements. The mean width of the eyebrow was found to be 47.28 ± 4.55 mm. The male eyebrow was flat and low-located, overlying the orbital rim. The apex was located at the lateral two-thirds of the brow's width. The vertical distance between the eyebrow's peak and the hairline was 51.3 ± 7.15 mm. In addition, averaged body contours were generated using the A.I.D. software, enabling graphic summarization of facial outline and periorbital contours of all analyzed subjects in the form of a single figure. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the aesthetic preferences of several leading modeling agencies, a concept of the ideal eyebrow for White men was created. The collected morphometric data on the periorbital region may guide the surgical rejuvenation attempts of achieving youthful and natural brow contours. It may also aid its reconstruction using hair transplant techniques.

Absorbable Suspension Sutures: Recommendations for Use in a Multimodal Nonsurgical Approach to Facial Rejuvenation.

BACKGROUND: Absorbable suspension sutures are an effective nonsurgical modality for correction of ptosis and tissue repositioning in the face and neck. The PLLA/PLGA suture is entirely absorbable and has a dual effect in that it both lifts tissues and induces collagenesis, thereby restoring contour. In clinical practice, nonsurgical modalities are rarely used in isolation, and combination treatments with fillers, neuromodulators, lipolysis, and energy-based devices are common. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to share the authors’ extensive experience in safely combing absorbable suspension sutures with other modalities in order to achieve optimal aesthetic outcomes for patients. The current work provides guidance to physicians who wish to incorporate absorbable suspension sutures into their aesthetics practice. METHODS: The authors discuss patient selection and expectation setting, rationale for selection and ordering of treatments, and optimal treatment spacing. Technologies discussed include fillers, neuromodulators, microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V), radiofrequency, lasers and intense pulsed-light (IPL), microneedling, and lipolysis. RESULTS: The authors share their approaches for combining nonsurgical techniques and present case studies illustrative of outcomes achievable through combination treatment with absorbable suspension sutures. The technical considerations for safely combining treatments such that optimal additive or synergistic benefit is reached for a particular patient are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: By combining nonsurgical modalities that address each of the four Rs (Repositioning tissue, Relaxation of hyperkinetic musculature, Resurfacing, and Revolumization),1 nonsurgical patient outcomes can be further improved. Absorbable suspension sutures represent a unique technology in that they are able to provide significant support to ptotic tissue in the face and neck. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(1):23-29. doi:10.36849/JDD.5684.

Polydioxanone Threads for Facial Rejuvenation: Analysis of Quality Variation in the Market.

BACKGROUND: Beside botulinum-toxin injections and hyaluronic acid fillers, thread lifts have established themselves as the third column of minimally invasive facial rejuvenation. Most commonly, barbed threads for this approach are made out of polydioxanone, a material known for decades from application in resorbable sutures. The clinical efficacy and the putative material safety of polydioxanone have fueled the popularity of thread lifts. METHODS: The present study highlights significant variation among six commercially available threads in microstructure, tensile strength, elasticity, anchoring capacity in human tissue, and biocompatibility. RESULTS: Despite their license to be marketed and sold in the European Union, some products performed significantly worse than others on material testing, and even displayed cytotoxic characteristics. CONCLUSION: The results of this study are highly relevant for clinicians and may be linked to various typical side effects of polydioxanone threads for facial rejuvenation.

Is oculofacial surgery complex or merely complicated?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is confusion in all of healthcare, including oculofacial surgery, as to what is 'complex' and what is 'merely complicated'. Although in common usage, these terms tend to be interchangeable, the distinction is more than trivial. A different and somewhat unfamiliar toolset is needed to successfully navigate complex problems. This review will explore a methodology for the physician to understand what is complex in oculofacial surgery, the tools needed to optimize performance in a complex healthcare system and successfully manage patients with complex diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: A specific understanding of complexity science in oculofacial surgery is only in its nascent beginnings at this point. Nevertheless, recent advances in closely related fields can provide concrete applications. The practice of oculofacial surgery is optimized within a healthcare network of supporting professionals. Moreover, a newer understanding of the 'complex' nature of disease common to oculofacial surgery, such as neoplasia and inflammation, will direct the physician to recognize the most appropriate therapies. SUMMARY: Oculofacial surgery, like all of medicine, is a fluid mixture of problems that are complex and those that are merely complicated. As a different toolset is needed to deal with each, physicians need to recognize these differences and acquire those tools.

Expert Consensus on Achieving Optimal Outcomes With Absorbable Suspension Suture Technology for Tissue Repositioning and Facial Recontouring.

A complete approach to facial rejuvenation includes restoration of the skin's surface, relaxation of muscles that contribute to hyperkinetic movement, revolumization, and repositioning/recontouring of descended tissues and fat pads. After receiving 510(k) clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015, the Silhouette InstaLift™ absorbable suspension suture became the only available non-surgical technique for repositioning of facial tissue. In January 2017, a consensus paper presented a review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of absorbable suspension sutures and provided information on treatment procedures. Since that time, the clinical experience of the authors has further shaped their treatment practices, highlighting the need for additional guidelines to support an optimal treatment approach. This update will expand upon the 2017 consensus paper on the safety and efficacy of absorbable suspension sutures and provide guidance for obtaining consistently high patient satisfaction with the procedure. Recommendations are based on the extensive clinical experience of expert physicians with absorbable suspension sutures over the past 2.5 years. Here, the authors provide guidance on full face assessment and treatment to support maximum benefit and provide patient selection and procedural recommendations. In addition, the authors stress the benefits of the dual mechanisms of action within the absorbable suspension suture: the immediate lift and volumizing over time that together lead to the outcome of recontouring. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(6):647-655.

Apparent Age is a Reliable Assessment Tool in 20 Facelift Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the literature is replete with favorable facelift results, there are few validated facial rejuvenation outcome measures. Apparent age (AA), a visual estimate of age by objective observers, has been utilized in several studies; although attractive, AA lacks validation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the reliability of AA, highlighting the importance of the exclusive use of validated outcome measures in future studies. METHODS: Ten blinded reviewers assessed pre- and postoperative photographs of 32 patients who underwent facelift. Each reviewer completed 3 surveys at 3-month intervals composed of 40 randomly ordered photos; totaling 1200 photographs assigned an AA. The intra-class correlation coefficient was classified as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor." The accuracy of assigned AA, agreement within 5 years, and reduction in AA were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean difference of preoperative true age from assigned AA was 2.74 ± 4.36 years. Forty-three percent of raters were within 5-years (±2.5) of the mean. Intra-rater reliability preoperatively and postoperatively were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.82-0.72) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.79-0.71), respectively. Inter-rater reliability preoperatively was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.99-0.96), while postoperatively was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.99-0.95). Mean AA reduction was 5.23 ± 2.81, with an intra-rater reliability 0.15 (95% CI, 0.03-0.34) and inter-rater reliability 0.65 (95% CI, 0.84-0.38). CONCLUSION: Using current statistical measures and analysis, AA is an acceptable tool for pre- and postoperative facial evaluation when assessed by a group of 10 reviewers. Therefore, apparent age represents a reliable and valid objective observer assigned measure for evaluation of facelift outcomes.

Expert Consensus on Absorbable Advanced Suspension Technology for Facial Tissue Repositioning and Volume Enhancement.

BACKGROUND: Signs of facial aging include wrinkles, loss of subcutaneous volume, decreased tone, texture, and sagging of the skin. The objective of this review is to determine whether facial suspension absorbable sutures are a safe and effective modality for facial rejuvenation.

METHOD: A group of US plastic surgeons and dermatologists who practice medical aesthetics convened to review evidence obtained from literature searches and to reach a consensus on clinical practice guidelines for the use of facial absorbable suspension sutures.

RESULTS: Currently, there are different types of lifting sutures available. Absorbable, facial suspension sutures allow for superior repositioning of tissue along a vector line together with the added benefit of volumization of the area. These benefits are for patients who have moderate facial aging and require treatment beyond the use of injectable products only.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with absorbable facial suspension sutures, when performed properly, is associated with minor and infrequent complications and offers a beneficial clinical alternative to traditional facial rejuvenation techniques.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(7):661-666.

Current Applications of Facial Volumization with Fillers.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article and watching the accompanying videos, the participant should be able to: 1. Assess patients seeking facial volumization and correlate volume deficiencies anatomically. 2. Identify appropriate fillers based on rheologic properties and anatomical needs. 3. Recognize poor candidates for facial volumization. 4. Recognize and treat filler-related side effects and complications. SUMMARY: Facial volumization is widely applied for minimally invasive facial rejuvenation both as a solitary means and in conjunction with surgical correction. Appropriate facial volumization is dependent on patient characteristics, consistent longitudinal anatomical changes, and qualities of fillers available. In this article, anatomical changes seen with aging are illustrated, appropriate techniques for facial volumization are described in the setting of correct filler selection, and potential complications are addressed.

The Development of Assessment Tools for Plastic Surgery Competencies.

BACKGROUND: Objective tools to assess procedural skills in plastic surgery residency training are currently lacking. There is an increasing need to address this deficit in order to meet today's training standards in North America. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this pilot study was to establish a methodology for determining the essential procedural steps for two plastic surgery procedures to assist resident training and assessment. METHODS: Following a literature review and needs assessment of resident training, the authors purposefully selected two procedures lacking robust assessment metrics (breast augmentation and facelift) and used a consensus process to complete a list of procedural steps for each. Using an online survey, plastic surgery Program Directors, Division Chiefs, and the Royal College Specialty Training Committee members in Canada were asked to indicate whether each step was considered essential or non-essential when assessing competence among graduating plastic surgery trainees. The Delphi methodology was used to obtain consensus among the panel. Panelist reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: A total of 17 steps for breast augmentation and 24 steps for facelift were deemed essential by consensus (Cronbach's alpha 0.87 and 0.85, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using the aforementioned technique, the essential procedural steps for two plastic surgery procedures were determined. Further work is required to develop assessment instruments based on these steps and to gather validity evidence in support of their use in surgical education.

Venous thromboembolism after facelift surgery under local anesthesia: results of a multicenter survey.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication of cosmetic surgery, and studies have suggested that the incidence is not insignificant in facelift surgery. Use of local anesthesia over general anesthesia and shorter operative times are probable contributing factors to lower VTE incidence. Because there have been no large-scale assessments of VTE in facelifts as such, we investigated VTE incidence and relevant factors in facelift surgeries performed under local anesthesia only. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter survey of facelift surgeons who utilize the American Society of Anesthesiologists level 1 oral anxiolysis and local diluted lidocaine anesthesia technique. Anonymous online surveys were sent to surgeons with questions regarding facelifts performed and VTE incidence over the previous 19 months. RESULTS: Seventy-seven surgeons (93 % response rate) completed the survey, with 74 eligible surgeons reporting at least one facelift. Respondents reported five VTE events, for an overall VTE incidence of 1 event in 5,844 surgeries. Surgeons who reported performing facelifts at high volumes (>500 facelifts in 19 months) had a significantly lower VTE incidence than lower-volume surgeons (p = 0.011). High-volume surgeons also reported a significantly lower average operative time (p = 0.016), but for surgeries that did or did not result in VTE, there was no significant difference between surgeon-reported average operative times. CONCLUSION: The low VTE incidence in this facelift series supports prior understanding that there is a low risk of VTE in surgery performed under local anesthesia and in surgery with shorter operative times. Limiting ancillary procedures to the face likely reduces operative time and likely also contributes to a lower VTE rate. The data further suggest that physicians performing facelifts more frequently tend to have shorter average operative times and overall lower VTE incidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Measuring outcomes that matter to face-lift patients: development and validation of FACE-Q appearance appraisal scales and adverse effects checklist for the lower face and neck.

BACKGROUND: The FACE-Q is a new patient-reported outcome instrument to evaluate a range of outcomes for patients undergoing any type of facial cosmetic operation, minimally invasive cosmetic procedure, or facial injectable. This article describes the development and validation of FACE-Q scales relevant to face-lift patients. METHODS: The FACE-Q was developed by following international guidelines for patient-reported outcome instrument development. For outcomes following a face lift, the authors developed five appearance appraisal scales (i.e., Satisfaction with Cheeks, Satisfaction with Lower Face and Jawline, Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds, Appraisal of Area Under the Chin, and Appraisal of the Neck) and an adverse effects checklist. A field test of these scales was performed in a sample of 225 face-lift patients, and were evaluated using both modern and traditional psychometric methods. RESULTS: The five FACE-Q appearance appraisal scales were found to be clinically meaningful, reliable, valid, and responsive to clinical change. These findings were supported by Rasch measurement theory analysis (e.g., overall chi-square values of p ≥ 0.18; Person Separation Index ≥ 0.88). Responsiveness analyses showed that patient scores for facial appearance improved significantly after treatment (p < 0.001); changes in scores were associated with moderate effect sizes (range effect size, 0.40 to 0.79; range standardized response mean, 0.37 to 0.69). Traditional psychometric statistics provided further support (e.g., Cronbach's alpha values ≥ 0.94) CONCLUSIONS:: The FACE-Q appearance appraisal scales are scientifically sound and clinically meaningful and can be used with the adverse effects checklist to measure patient-reported outcomes following a face lift.

Exploratory, randomized, controlled, phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant fibrin sealant VH S/D 4 S-Apr (ARTISS) in patients undergoing rhytidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Suction drains are commonly placed after rhytidectomy surgery to avoid seroma formation that may result from dead spaces between skin layers. Fibrin sealants promote tissue adherence by cross-linking with extracellular matrix proteins, which may reduce the dead space under skin flaps. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of the fibrin sealant (FS) VH S/D 4 s-apr (ARTISS; Baxter Healthcare Corp, Deerfield, Illinois), added to standard-of-care (SoC) treatment, on tissue plane adherence and local hemostasis in rhytidectomy patients. METHODS: In this phase 2, prospective, controlled, randomized, evaluator- and patient-blinded, multicenter study, 45 patients (of 56 possible enrollees) received SoC treatment on 1 side of the face and adjunctive FS VH S/D 4 s-apr treatment on the other side. Outcomes measures included visual assessments of ecchymosis (by blinded reviewers), grading of ecchymosis and edema, drainage volumes, occurrence of hematoma/seroma, safety evaluations, and patient-reported assessments of pain, numbness, and treatment preferences postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 55.1 years. Rates and grades of ecchymosis and edema were similar for the 2 treatments. The mean (SD) drainage volume 24 hours after surgery was 11.5 (13.7) mL from the FS VH S/D 4 s-apr-treated sides of the face and 26.8 (24.0) mL from the SoC-only sides (P < .0001). Patient assessments of pain, numbness, and preference favored treatment with FS VH S/D 4 s-apr. Adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant use of FS VH S/D 4 s-apr appears to be safe and results in lower drainage volumes than SoC treatment alone.

Blepharoplasty and periorbital surgical rejuvenation.

The periorbital region forms the epicenter of facial aging changes and receives highest attention from physicians and patients. The concern about visual function, clubbed with the need for hidden incisions, makes the periocular region a highly specialized surgical area, most appropriately handled by an ophthalmic plastic surgeon. The article provides an overview of cosmetic eyelid and facial surgery in the periocular region. Common aesthetic surgical procedures as well as ocular side-effects of commonly performed periocular injections are discussed from the dermatologist's point of view.

Midface lifting: current standards.

The most significant factor contributing to the overall change in the appearance of an individual's facial features over time is age. This process of gradual structural weakening of the face begins during the third decade and continues to worsen during the remainder of an individual's lifetime. Here, we discuss how the approach to midface rejuvenation has evolved over time owing to our increased understanding of the aging process. In addition, we discuss specific techniques that we use that have helped us achieve more natural and lasting results.

Rhytidectomy: principles and practice emphasizing safety.

There is an unprecedented acceptance of rhytidectomy by today's society. No longer limited to the affluent few, middle class citizens are devoting their expendable income to achieve a more youthful appearance that is natural and inconspicuous. Despite recent difficult economic times, the mindset of the working population continues to be welcoming of rhytidectomy as a way to achieve a refreshed look while expecting minimal downtime and morbidity. To achieve these results, the current literature has described an array of techniques; however, there is no consensus on a preferred method, which reflects limitations and advantages inherent to every style of face-lifting. Each individual patient will have specific needs, and it is key for the facial plastic surgeon to select a technique that can address those areas most affected by the aging process. Whichever method used, an emphasis on safety is of the utmost importance. A solid understanding of the relevant anatomy is imperative as is the awareness of how to best avoid complications. Rhytidectomy can be a challenging procedure, and although complications are fortunately rare, they can be cosmetically devastating and poorly accepted by the elective cosmetic patient. This article aims at providing a summary of the history, the anatomy, and the currently accepted methods in rhytidectomy, emphasizing principles and practices of safety.