Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(8): e0009705, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34424895

ABSTRACT

The Government of Rwanda reported an outbreak of Rift Valley fever (RVF) in the Eastern Province in 2018. To respond to the outbreak, vaccination and education campaigns about the disease were carried out. Because RVF cases continue to be detected in Rwanda and the disease impacts livelihoods and health, accurate knowledge and communication are imperative. The objectives of this study were to evaluate knowledge and risk perceptions of RVF transmission among livestock farmers in Nyagatare District, Eastern Province, Rwanda, and to compare RVF knowledge, risk perceptions, and farming practices between male and female livestock farmers. This cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted in selected sectors of Nyagatare District in the Eastern Province of Rwanda in June 2019. A 34-question survey was used to ask about demographics, livestock ownership, risk perceptions about zoonotic diseases and livestock management, RVF knowledge, preferred communication sources and information sharing strategies, and protective strategies for RVF mitigation while working with livestock. Livestock farmers were interviewed at three milk collection centers, two village meeting points, a farm cooperative meeting, and during door-to-door visits in villages. In total, 123 livestock farmers were interviewed. The survey found that most livestock farmers lacked knowledge about epizootic and zoonotic transmission of RVF, more male livestock farmers were familiar with RVF and risk mitigation strategies, and female livestock farmers are not viewed as reliable sources of information. Additionally, most livestock farmers had not vaccinated their animals against RVF despite past vaccination campaigns. Radio was the most popular communication channel. These findings show that RVF knowledge and information sharing are inadequate among livestock farmers in Eastern Province. Therefore, vaccination and education campaigns may need to be reevaluated within the context of these trends in order to prepare for future RVF outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Farmers/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Rift Valley Fever/psychology , Viral Zoonoses/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Communication , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Information Dissemination , Livestock/growth & development , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Rift Valley Fever/virology , Rift Valley fever virus/physiology , Rwanda , Viral Zoonoses/virology , Young Adult
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 11(3): e0005405, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28273071

ABSTRACT

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is an emerging mosquito-borne viral hemorrhagic fever in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, affecting humans and livestock. For spread of infectious diseases, including RVF, knowledge, attitude and practices play an important role, and the understanding of the influence of behavior is crucial to improve prevention and control efforts. The objective of the study was to assess RVF exposure, in a multiethnic region in Kenya known to experience RVF outbreaks, from the behavior perspective. We investigated how communities in Isiolo County, Kenya were affected, in relation to their knowledge, attitude and practices, by the RVF outbreak of 2006/2007. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 698 households selected randomly from three different ethnic communities. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire regarding knowledge, attitudes and practices that could affect the spread of RVF. In addition, information was collected from the communities regarding the number of humans and livestock affected during the RVF outbreak. This study found that better knowledge about a specific disease does not always translate to better practices to avoid exposure to the disease. However, the high knowledge, attitude and practice score measured as a single index of the Maasai community may explain why they were less affected, compared to other investigated communities (Borana and Turkana), by RVF during the 2006/2007 outbreak. We conclude that RVF exposure in Isiolo County, Kenya during the outbreak was likely determined by the behavioral differences of different resident community groups. We then recommend that strategies to combat RVF should take into consideration behavioral differences among communities.


Subject(s)
Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure , Ethnicity , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Rift Valley Fever/epidemiology , Rift Valley Fever/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Rift Valley Fever/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Epidemiol Infect ; 145(7): 1304-1319, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28162129

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to assess the awareness of cattle abortions due to brucellosis, Rift Valley fever (RVF) and leptospirosis, and to compare frequencies of reported abortions in communities living at the periphery of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area in southeastern Zimbabwe. Three study sites were selected based on the type of livestock-wildlife interface: porous livestock-wildlife interface (unrestricted); non-porous livestock-wildlife interface (restricted by fencing); and livestock-wildlife non-interface (totally absent or control). Respondents randomly selected from a list of potential cattle farmers (N = 379) distributed at porous (40·1%), non-interface (35·5%) and non-porous (26·4%), were interviewed using a combined close- and open-ended questionnaire. Focus group discussions were conducted with 10-12 members of each community. More abortions in the last 5 years were reported from the porous interface (52%) and a significantly higher per cent of respondents from the porous interface (P < 0·05) perceived wildlife as playing a role in livestock abortions compared with the other interface types. The odds of reporting abortions in cattle were higher in large herd sizes (odds ratio (OR) = 2·6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·5-4·3), porous (OR = 1·9; 95% CI 1·0-3·5) and non-porous interface (OR = 2·2; 95% CI 1·1-4·3) compared with livestock-wildlife non-interface areas. About 21·6% of the respondents knew brucellosis as a cause of abortion, compared with RVF (9·8%) and leptospirosis (3·7%). These results explain to some extent, the existence of human/wildlife conflict in the studied livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zimbabwe, which militates against biodiversity conservation efforts. The low awareness of zoonoses means the public is at risk of contracting some of these infections. Thus, further studies should focus on livestock-wildlife interface areas to assess if the increased rates of abortions reported in cattle may be due to exposure to wildlife or other factors. The government of Zimbabwe needs to launch educational programmes on public health awareness in these remote areas at the periphery of transfrontier conservation areas where livestock-wildlife interface exists to help mitigate the morbidity and mortality of people from some of the known zoonotic diseases.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Veterinary/psychology , Brucellosis/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Leptospirosis/psychology , Rift Valley Fever/psychology , Zoonoses/psychology , Abortion, Veterinary/epidemiology , Abortion, Veterinary/etiology , Abortion, Veterinary/microbiology , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Animals, Wild , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Cattle Diseases/psychology , Disease Notification , Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Goat Diseases/microbiology , Goat Diseases/psychology , Goats , Humans , Leptospirosis/epidemiology , Leptospirosis/microbiology , Prevalence , Rift Valley Fever/epidemiology , Rift Valley Fever/microbiology , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Sheep Diseases/psychology , Zimbabwe/epidemiology , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/microbiology
4.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 11(2): e0005383, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28207905

ABSTRACT

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a viral mosquito-borne disease with the potential for global expansion, causes hemorrhagic fever, and has a high case fatality rate in young animals and in humans. Using a cross-sectional community-based study design, we investigated the knowledge, attitudes and practices of people living in small village in Sudan with respect to RVF outbreaks. A special One Health questionnaire was developed to compile data from 235 heads of household concerning their knowledge, attitudes, and practices with regard to controlling RVF. Although the 2007 RVF outbreak in Sudan had negatively affected the participants' food availability and livestock income, the participants did not fully understand how to identify RVF symptoms and risk factors for both humans and livestock. For example, the participants mistakenly believed that avoiding livestock that had suffered spontaneous abortions was the least important risk factor for RVF. Although the majority noticed an increase in mosquito population during the 2007 RVF outbreak, few used impregnated bed nets as preventive measures. The community was reluctant to notify the authorities about RVF suspicion in livestock, a sentinel for human RVF infection. Almost all the respondents stressed that they would not receive any compensation for their dead livestock if they notified the authorities. In addition, the participants believed that controlling RVF outbreaks was mainly the responsibility of human health authorities rather than veterinary authorities. The majority of the participants were aware that RVF could spread from one region to another within the country. Participants received most their information about RVF from social networks and the mass media, rather than the health system or veterinarians. Because the perceived role of the community in controlling RVF was fragmented, the probability of RVF spread increased.


Subject(s)
Rift Valley Fever/prevention & control , Rift Valley Fever/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Culicidae/physiology , Culicidae/virology , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Insect Vectors/physiology , Insect Vectors/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Rift Valley Fever/epidemiology , Rift Valley Fever/transmission , Rift Valley fever virus/genetics , Rift Valley fever virus/isolation & purification , Rift Valley fever virus/physiology , Risk Factors , Sudan/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 9(11): e0004239, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26566218

ABSTRACT

Outbreaks of Rift Valley fever (RVF), a mosquito-borne viral zoonosis, have previously been associated with unusually heavy rainfall and extensive flooding. The disease is a serious public health problem in Africa and the Middle East, and is a potential global health threat. In Kenya, outbreaks of the disease have disproportionately affected impoverished pastoralist communities. This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding RVF among the pastoralists of North Eastern Kenya, and to establish the determinants of KAP on RVF. A cross-sectional study involving 392 pastoralists living in Ijara district (Masalani and Ijara wards) was carried out using an interview questionnaire. All respondents interviewed (100%) had heard about RVF disease. They recognized that the disease is dangerous (99%), and had a positive attitude towards vaccination of animals (77%). However, few respondents knew that abortion (11%) and high mortality of young animals (10%) were key signs of RVF in animals. Very few (4%) use any form of protection when handling sick animals to avoid infection. Significant factors associated with knowledge were being in a household with a history of RVF infection (OR = 1.262, 95% CI = 1.099-1.447), having more livestock (OR = 1.285, 95% CI = 1.175-1.404) and the place of residence, Masalani (OR = 0.526, 95% CI = 0.480-0.576). Overall knowledge score on RVF was found to be a significant predictor of good preventive practice of the disease (OR = 1.073, 95% CI = 1.047-1.101). Despite the positive attitude that pastoralist communities have towards the prevention of RVF, there exist gaps in knowledge and good practices on the disease. Therefore there is need for public health education to address these gaps, and to identify and facilitate the removal of barriers to behavioural change related to the prevention of RVF.


Subject(s)
Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Occupational Exposure , Rift Valley Fever/prevention & control , Rift Valley Fever/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Kenya , Male , Middle Aged , Rift Valley Fever/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...